Supplementary Data. Supplementary Table S2. Antiretroviral Therapies Taken with Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir

Similar documents
Antiretroviral Dosing in Renal Impairment

Real Life Experience of Dolutegravir and Lamivudine Dual Therapy As a Switching Regimen in HIVTR Cohort

Antiviral treatment in Unique Populations

Slide 1 Will DAA drug interactions matter in the future? David Back. David Back University of Liverpool UK. University of Liverpool June 2015

Comprehensive Guideline Summary

HIV and the Central Nervous System Impact of Drug Distribution Scott L. Letendre, MD. Professor of Medicine University of California, San Diego

The use of antiretroviral agents during pregnancy in Canada and compliance with North-American guidelines

ARVs on an Empty Stomach: Food Interaction Studies in a resource Limited Setting

The ART of Managing Drug-Drug Interactions in Patients with HIV

HIV-HCV coinfection. Mark Sulkowski, MD Professor of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, Maryland

Effects of cobicistat on tenofovir exposure and its long-term tolerability: is it time to rethink at TAF trials?

Continuing Education for Pharmacy Technicians

Pharmacological considerations on the use of ARVs in pregnancy

Starting and Switching ART: 2016

Simplifying HIV Treatment Now and in the Future

HIV Treatment: New and Veteran Drugs Classes

The impact of antiretroviral drugs on renal function

STRIBILD (aka. The Quad Pill)

HIV - Therapy Principles

ART and Prevention: What do we know?

Physiologically-Based Simulation of Daclatasvir Pharmacokinetics With Antiretroviral Inducers and Inhibitors of Cytochrome P450 and Drug Transporters

Clinical skills building - HIV drug resistance

COMPETING INTEREST OF FINANCIAL VALUE

Vitamin D Deficiency in HIV: A Shadow on Long-Term Management?

Selecting an Initial Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Regimen

ART: The New, The Old and The Ugly

Third Agent Advantages Disadvantages. Component Tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) 300/200 mg (coformulated with EFV as Atripla) 1 tab once daily

Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)

HIV Treatment: State of the Art 2013

Medication Errors Focus on the HIV-Infected Patient

PHARMACOKINETICS OF ANTIRETROVIRAL AND ANTI-HCV AGENTS

Important new concerns or changes to the current ones will be included in updates of Symtuza's RMP.

Antiretroviral Therapy: What to Start

COMPREHENSIVE ANTIRETROVIRAL TABLE: ADULT DOSING, DOSAGE FORM MODIFICATIONS, ADVERSE REACTIONS and INTERACTION POTENTIAL

POST-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS, PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS, & TREATMENT OF HIV

HIV 101. Applications of Antiretroviral Therapy

Supplementary Appendix

Switching antiretroviral therapy to safer strategies based on integrase inhibitors

ACTHIV 2018: A State-of-the-Science Conference for Frontline Health Professionals

Antiretroviral Drugs

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Cases from the Clinic(ians): Case-Based Panel Discussion

SA HIV Clinicians Society Adult ART guidelines

Supplementary Online Content

Switching ARV Regimens: Managing Toxicity and Improving Tolerability; Switches & Class-Sparing Approaches

Susan L. Koletar, MD

Didactic Series. Switching Regimens in the Setting of Virologic Suppression

TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL HIV AMBULATORY CARE ROTATION

SINGLE. Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects

BHIVA antiretroviral treatment guidelines 2015

HIV Management Update 2015

Supplementary information

ANTIRETROVIRAL TREATMENTS (Part 1of

TDF containing ART: Efficacy and Safety. Dr Lloyd B. Mulenga Adult Infectious Diseases Centre University Teaching Hospital Lusaka, Zambia

Pediatric HIV Infection and the Medical Management of Pregnant Women infected with HIV. Ernesto Parra, M.D., M.P.H.

COMPREHENSIVE ANTIRETROVIRAL TABLE: ADULT DOSING**, DOSAGE FORM MODIFICATIONS, ADVERSE REACTIONS and INTERACTION POTENTIAL

HIV Drugs and the HIV Lifecycle

Emtricitabine/ tenofovir alafenamide (HIV infection)

12th European AIDS Conference / EACS ARV Therapies and Therapeutic Strategies A CME Newsletter

FOCUS ON HIV. By Christine Elliott, BScPhm, RPh

Protease Inhibitors and Renal Function in Patients with HIV Infection: a Systematic Review

Acute kidney injury KDIGO stage 2 to 3 in HIV-positive patients treated with cart a case series over 11 years in a cohort of 1,153 patients

Differences in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rates (GFR) in Efavirenz (EFV) or Tenofovir (TDF)-treated Adults in ESS40006

A Changing Landscape: New and Pipeline HIV Therapies

What's new in the WHO ART guidelines How did markets react?

Criteria for Oral PrEP

Updates to the HHS Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents Living with HIV Updated October 17, 2017

Single Pill Combinations Versus Generics: Prescribing Practices in a New Healthcare Era

What next? Francois Venter. ART new drugs, new studies. Wits Reproductive Health & HIV Institute

Susan L. Koletar, MD

Hepatitis C Virus Management

Antiretroviral Treatment 2014

Second-Line Therapy NORTHWEST AIDS EDUCATION AND TRAINING CENTER

HIV/AIDS Prenatal Care for HIV+ Mothers. 1. Algorithm for Prenatal Screening & Care (Antepartum)

HIV Pharmacology 101ish - 202ish: New HIV Clinicians Workshop

INTERGRASE INHIBITORS- WHAT S NEW?

Optimizing 2 nd and 3 rd Line Antiretroviral Therapy in Children and Adolescents

Module Summary of Product Characteristics

Appropriate Use & Safety Edits

Unmet needs and challenges of current ART in South Africa. Michelle Moorhouse 21 Nov 2015

Department of General Medicine, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo; and 2

Clinical Commissioning Policy: Use of cobicistat (Tybost ) as a booster in treatment of HIV positive adults and adolescents

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Forecasting pipeline ARVs. Joseph Perriëns Sandeep Juneja Aastha Gupta

Disclosures. Update on HIV Drug Therapy: A Case based Discussion. Case # 1: Dr. Grant has received grant support from BMS, Gilead, Janssen, and Viiv

Global Prevalence of HBV, HCV, HIV

Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors on the Horizon

HIV Treatment Evolution. Kimberly Y. Smith MD MPH Vice President and Head, Global Research and Medical Strategy Viiv Healthcare

Introduction to HIV Drug Resistance. Kevin L. Ard, MD, MPH Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School

DTG Versus LPV/r in Second Line (DAWNING): Outcomes by WHO- Recommended NRTI Backbone

treatment passport 1

Renal Transporters- pathophysiology of drug - induced renal disorders. Lisa Harris, Pharmacist, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, 2015 November

WESTERN CAPE ART GUIDELINES PRESENTATION 2013

HIV Diagnosis and Management 2015 Update. Faria Farhat, MD MedStar Washington Hospital Center

Kimberly Adkison, 1 Lesley Kahl, 1 Elizabeth Blair, 1 Kostas Angelis, 2 Herta Crauwels, 3 Maria Nascimento, 1 Michael Aboud 1

Case # 1. Case #1 (cont d)

The BATAR Study Boosted Atazanavir Truvada vs. Atazanavir Raltegravir

HIV for the Non-ID Pharmacist

ACTHIV 2018: A State-of-the-Science Conference for Frontline Health Professionals

Persistent low level viraemia on third line ART

Transcription:

Supplementary Data Statistical Analysis Due to the limited number of patients with acute kidney injury and concern for model overfitting, covariates included in multivariable logistic regression analyses were limited to main effects for baseline measures. Covariate selection was driven by available knowledge and biological plausibility of potential confounders, taking into consideration the hypothesis of interest. Tests for statistical interactions between covariates were not done. Before implementation of any specific statistical analysis for serum levels of creatinine (SCr) and creatinine clearance (CrCl), all assumptions were assessed (i.e., normality and homogeneity of variance). SCr required a natural logarithm transformation before analysis to help ensure statistical assumptions were not violated. Repeated-measures analyses for SCr and CrCl were performed with a mean model through the SAS MIXED Procedure (version 9.4) providing separate estimates of the mean by time on study (baseline, 1 to <4weeks,4to<8weeks,8to<12 weeks, 12 24 weeks, and >24 weeks) and treatment group [tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or non-tdf]. A compound-symmetric variance covariance form in repeated measurements was assumed for each outcome and robust estimates of the standard errors of parameters were used to perform statistical tests and construct 95% confidence intervals. 1 The model-based means are unbiased with unbalanced and missing data, so long as the missing data are noninformative (missing at random). Specific statistical tests were done within the framework of the mixed-effects linear model. After analysis of the ln-transformed SCr outcome, the mean and 95% confidence intervals were back transformed to the usual arithmetic scale and reported as geometric mean along with the 95% confidence intervals. Reference 1. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL: Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994. Supplementary Table S1. Nephrotoxic Medications and Medication Classes Antimicrobial agents Acyclovir Aminoglycosides, systemic Amphotericin B deoxycholate, liposomal, and lipid complex formulations Beta-lactams Foscarnet Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim Valacyclovir Vancomycin Antineoplastic agents Cisplatin Methotrexate Cardiovascular agents Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors Angiotensin II receptor blockers Loop diuretics Thiazide diuretics Other Allopurinol Contrast dye Cyclosporine Lithium Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents Tacrolimus Supplementary Table S2. Antiretroviral Therapies Taken with Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir TDF (n = 86) Non-TDF (n = 31) ART administered with LDV/SOF, n (%) Darunavir/ritonavir 22 (25.6) 13 (41.9) Atazanavir/ritonavir 15 (17.4) 7 (22.6) Atazanavir 0 (0) 1 (3.2) Lopinavir/ritonavir 4 (4.7) 3 (9.7) Efavirenz 24 (27.9) 2 (6.5) Rilpivirine 10 (11.6) 0 (0) Etravirine 1 (1.2) 1 (3.2) Nevirapine 1 (1.2) 0 (0) Dolutegravir 9 (10.5) 8 (25.8) Raltegravir 13 (15.1) 9 (29) Elvitegravir/cobicistat 1 (1.2) 0 (0) Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 86 (100) 0 (0) Abacavir 6 (7) 20 (64.5) Emtricitabine 75 (87.2) 2 (6.5) Lamivudine 5 (5.8) 24 (77.4) Zidovudine 1 (1.2) 3 (9.7) Didanosine 0 (0) 1 (3.2) Maraviroc 1 (1.2) 0 (0) ART, antiretroviral therapy; LDV, ledipasvir; SOF, sofosbuvir; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Supplementary Table S3. Nephrotoxic Medication and Medication Class Use According to Study Group from Start of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Therapy Through 48 Weeks After Completing Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Therapy Medication/medication class a TDF, n (%), n = 86 Non-TDF, n (%), n = 31 ACEi/ARB 27 (31.4) 14 (45.2) Acyclovir/valacyclovir 11 (12.8) 2 (6.5) Allopurinol 1 (1.2) 2 (6.5) Beta-lactam antibiotics 14 (16.3) 6 (19.4) Contrast, intravenous 16 (18.6) 4 (12.9) Loop diuretics 2 (2.3) 1 (3.2) NSAID 50 (58.1) 19 (61.3) Sulfonamide antibiotics 10 (11.6) 3 (9.7) Thiazide diuretics 17 (19.8) 9 (29) Vancomycin, intravenous 2 (2.3) 1 (3.2) a Receipt of medication was determined based upon retrospective chart review of the electronic medical records available at the study site. ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Supplementary Table S4. Baseline Laboratories Assessing for Proximal Renal Tubule Dysfunction TDF (n = 87) Non-TDF (n = 31) Serum potassium, meq/l, mean (SD) 4.1 (0.43) 4.1 (0.41) Serum bicarbonate, meq/l, mean (SD) 28.7 (3.1) 27.6 (2.9) Serum phosphorus, mg/dl, median (IQR) (n) 3.1 (2.4 3.4) (26) 3.6 (3 3.8) (9) Glycosuria 250 mg/dl, n/total (%) 0/40 (0) 2/19 (10.5) Proteinuria 100 mg/dl, n/total (%) 4/40 (10) 4/19 (21.1) IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation.

Supplementary Table S5. Summary of Study Patients with Acute Kidney Injury That Did Not Resolve by the End of the Study Period Baseline demographic A 34-year-old black male, no comorbid conditions A 54-year-old black male, A 35-year-old black male, A 59-year-old black male, A 61-year-old black male, A 47-year-old black male, A 52-year-old black male, A 52-year-old black male, A 61-year-old black male, Antiretroviral therapy LDV/SOF treatment duration, weeks Baseline SCr, mg/dl (CrCl, ml/min) Maximum SCr, mg/dl (CrCl, ml/min) Last recorded SCr for study period a, mg/dl (CrCl, ml/min) Time, days, between LDV/SOF initiation and AKI Time, days, between LDV/SOF initiation and last recorded SCr for study period a DTG, TDF/FTC 12 1.1 (114) 1.4 (89) 1.4 (89) 8 218 DRV/r, TDF/FTC 12 1 (85) 1.3 (65) 1.3 (65) b 298 298 ATV/r, TDF/FTC 12 0.8 (>120) 1.2 (95) 1.2 (95) 66 314 DRV/r, ABC, 3TC 12 2 (46) 2.4 (38) 2.4 (38) b 316 316 DRV/r, ABC/3TC 8 c 0.9 (91) 1.3 (63) 1.2 (69) 29 286 EFV, ABC/3TC 12 1.7 (43) 2.2 (33) 2.2 (33) 47 257 ABC/3TC, RAL 12 1 (>120) 1.4 (90) 1.3 (97) 30 274 ATV/r, ABC/3TC 12 3.1 (27) 5.4 (15) 5.4 (15) 46 179 ABC, 3TC, DTG 12 1.3 (48) 1.6 (39) 1.6 (39) b 354 354 a Study period was defined as the day of initiating LDV/SOF therapy through 48 weeks after completing LDV/SOF therapy. b This was the first documented AKI for the patient during the study period. c Intended 12 weeks of LDV/SOF, but patient only received 8 weeks of therapy. 3TC, lamivudine; ABC, abacavir; AKI, acute kidney injury; ATV, atazanavir; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CrCl, creatinine clearance; DRV, darunavir; DTG, dolutegravir; EFV, efavirenz; FTC, emtricitabine;, hypertension; r, ritonavir; RAL, raltegravir; SCr, serum creatinine.

Supplementary Table S6. Univariable Logistic Regression of Risk Factors Potentially Associated with Acute Kidney Injury Among Patients Coinfected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Hepatitis C Virus Risk factor Incidence of AKI, n/total (%) OR 95% CI p Treatment TDF 13/86 (15) Reference <.001 Non-TDF 19/31 (61) 8.89 3.50 22.60 Age, years 55 15/62 (24) Reference.67 <55 17/55 (31) 1.40 0.62 2.71 Sex Male 23/92 (25) Reference.28 Female 9/25 (36) 1.69 0.66 4.33 Race (n = 113) White 2/14 (14) Reference.34 a Black 30/99 (30) 2.61 0.55 12.38 CD4 count <500 17/60 (28) Reference.81 500 15/57 (26) 0.90 0.40 2.04 Use of boosted HIV PI No 12/53 (23) Reference.30 Yes 20/64 (31) 1.55 0.68 3.57 Chronic kidney disease No 20/94 (21) Reference.004 Yes 12/23 (52) 4.04 1.55 10.50 Hypertension No 9/47 (19) Reference.11 Yes 23/70 (33) 2.07 0.86 4.99 Diabetes mellitus No 29/100 (29) Reference.40 a Yes 3/17 (18) 0.53 0.14 1.96 Proteinuria (n = 59) No 18/51 (35) Reference 1.00 a Yes 3/8 (38) 1.10 0.24 5.14 Use of other nephrotoxic agents ACEi/ARB No 19/76 (25) Reference.44 Yes 13/41 (32) 1.39 0.60 3.22 Acyclovir/valacyclovir No 29/104 (28) Reference 1.00 a Yes 3/13 (23) 0.78 0.20 3.02 Beta-lactam No 25/97 (26) Reference.40 Yes 7/20 (35) 0.55 0.56 4.32 Contrast, intravenous No 25/97 (26) Reference.40 Yes 7/20 (35) 1.55 0.56 4.32 NSAID No 12/48 (25) Reference.64 Yes 20/69 (29) 1.22 0.53 2.82 Sulfonamide No 28/104 (27) Reference.75 a Yes 4/13 (31) 1.21 0.34 4.23 Thiazide diuretic No 26/91 (29) Reference.58 Yes 6/26 (23) 0.75 0.27 2.08 a Fisher s exact test. CI, confidence interval; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; OR, odds ratio; PI, protease inhibitor.

Supplementary Table S7. Multivariable Logistic Regression of Creatinine Clearance Per 10 ml/min Decrease and Its Potential Association with Acute Kidney Injury Among Patients Coinfected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Hepatitis C Virus Factor AKI No AKI Adjusted OR 95% CI p All patients, n (%) 32 (27) 85 (73) Treatment (non-tdf/tdf) a, n/total (%) 19/32 (59) 12/85 (14) 7.36 2.77 19.52 <.001 CrCl, ml/min, mean (SD) 72.6 (25.2) 85.3 (21.6) 1.14 0.92 1.41.24 a n (%) where the numerator of the fraction is the at risk category (i.e., the number of patients treated with non-tdf ART). Supplementary Table S8. Multivariable Logistic Regression of Serum Creatinine Per 0.1 mg/dl Increase and Its Potential Association with Acute Kidney Injury Among Patients Coinfected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Hepatitis C Virus Factor AKI No AKI Adjusted OR 95% CI p All patients, n (%) 32 (27) 85 (73) Treatment (non-tdf/tdf) a, n/total (%) 19/32 (59) 12/85 (14) 7.60 2.90 19.91 <.001 SCr, mg/dl, mean (SD) 1.20 (0.44) 1.04 (0.25) 1.10 0.93 1.29.27 a n (%) where the numerator of the fraction is the at risk category (i.e., the number of patients treated with non-tdf ART).