Hartman Value Profile Self

Similar documents
Hartman Value Profile Self

Hartman Value Profile Sales

Personal Talent Skills Inventory

TTI Personal Talent Skills Inventory Coaching Report

TTI Personal Talent Skills Inventory Emotional Intelligence Version

Sample User. The DISC Report. Style: Communicator. Wednesday, March 1, , PeopleKeys, Inc. Page 1 / 15

The Six 80:20 Critical Performance Elements. for Kelly Sample

POLI 100M: Poli-cal Psychology. Lecture 2: Individual Differences Taylor N. Carlson

Based on the Social Styles model by Dr. Tony Alessandra Personalized Social Style Report for: Sample Report

THE CUSTOMER SERVICE ATTRIBUTE INDEX

Psych 101: Ten Tips to Improve Shooters Mental Fitness in Practice & Competition Mark & Sally Stevens

THE EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE ATTRIBUTE INDEX

REACHING RECOVERY CONSULTATION TOOL BOX

The Attribute Index - Leadership

ONLINE TRAINING TEXAS STATEWIDE LEADERSHIP FOR AUTISM TRAINING

The Attentional and Interpersonal Style (TAIS) Inventory: Measuring the Building Blocks of Performance

POLI 100M: Poli-cal Psychology. Lecture 3: Poli-cal Par-cipa-on and Vo-ng Taylor N. Carlson

Pathways to Empowerment: Mid Term Review, Ghana

Behavioral EQ MULTI-RATER PROFILE. Prepared for: By: Session: 22 Jul Madeline Bertrand. Sample Organization

Behavioral Ac-va-on for Depression. What is Behavioral Ac-va-on? What is Behavioral Ac-va-on? 2/4/

Week 3: Exploring Reactivity

Missouri SBIRT. Grant Highlights:

Conceptualisa-on and Treatment of Low Self-Esteem

THE LEADERSHIP/MANAGEMENT ATTRIBUTE INDEX

Exploring YOUR inner-self through Vocal Profiling

And Can It Be... to know why am I here and what is life all about?

The McQuaig Word Survey

Working with an Interpreter QUICK GUIDE. your Clients. What is Interpreta on? Common Terms Arranging for an interpreter Fee schedule

Information Booklet. Revised and updated January Wilkinson Street : Sheffield : S10 2GJ.

Con nued Professional Development (CPD) Scheme

Successful School- based Asthma Programs

The Conference That Counts! March, 2018

2015 Keynote Speaker Dina Tyler. Dina Tyler, Director of the Bay Area Mandala Project and co-founder of the Bay Area Hearing Voices Network.

Emotional Quotient. Andrew Doe. Test Job Acme Acme Test Slogan Acme Company N. Pacesetter Way

Development. summary. Sam Sample. Emotional Intelligence Profile. Wednesday 5 April 2017 General Working Population (sample size 1634) Sam Sample

CAN T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?

chapter 1 chapter 2 chapter 3 chapter 4

Pragma-c Deficit. Pragma-c deficit characteris-cs. Pragma-cs deficit causes 01/08/2016

Don't Let Codependent Behavior Spoil Your Christmas

The. DISCstyles Behavioral Report

TTI Success Insights Emotional Quotient Version

OVERCOMING THE PERFORMANCE FEARS OF TRACK AND FIELD ATHLETES. Ralph Vernacchia, Ph.D.

POLI 100M: Poli-cal Psychology. Lecture 10: Implicit A;tudes and Race Taylor N. Carlson

People. Overcoming Negativity in the workplace. Positive VS Negative. Habits of Negative People. They... Habits of Positive People

Occupa onal Performance Academy 2016 Workshop Catalog

Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function BRIEF. Interpretive Report. Developed by SAMPLE

BEING A LEADER and LEADERSHIP

Emotional-Social Intelligence Index

UNDERSTANDING CORRELATION

The world is facing a cri cal health care problem: in the

THE INTEGRITY PROFILING SYSTEM

Crea%ng the Persuasive Speech. Chapter 14

Bouncing back from setbacks

Lumus360 Psychometric Profile Pat Sample

BIRKMAN REPORT THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR: JOHN Q. PUBLIC (D00112) ANDREW DEMO (G526VC) DATE PRINTED February

Project: Date: Presented by: Siegel HR

2017 MEMORY LOSS CONFERENCE

Workplace Report. for the Myers Briggs Type Indicator Instrument. This report includes:

White Supremacy Culture perfectionism antidotes sense of urgency

mike jay August 23, 2006 (Online)

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

VISA to (W)hole Personal Leadership

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE TEST-R

WASHINGTON SERVICE CORPS SERVES Institute

SAMPLE. Behavioral EQ SELF-PERCEPTION PROFILE. Prepared for: By: Session: 23 Jul Lars Dupont. Sample Organization

Sleep Study Rehearsal Guide... preparing people with intellectual and developmental disabilities I/DD) to successfully complete a Sleep Study

A Helping Model of Problem Solving

Top-50 Mental Gym Workouts

XIV. Bina onal Health Week. Health is Movement. October 4-18, General Report

Let s start with some ques ons

Comparison Report For Kathryn Petersen Working with Martin Gilmore

M A N A G E R ENHANCED. Multi-Rater SOCIAL STYLE. Profile. Prepared for: By: Session: Lars Dupont. Sample Organization

2/5/2014. BIOMARKERS AND PROSTATE CANCER Can new biomarkers improve clinical decision making? Samir Bidnur PGY Feb

POSITION STATEMENT DRIVING AND OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNOEA (OSA) 2018

Samantha Wright. September 03, 2003

PARENTS CENTRES NZ INC NATIONAL SUPPORT TEAM PARENTS CENTRES NZ INC BOARD KIWIPARENT PARENTS CENTRES NZ INC ADVISORS

GAINING INSIGHT INTO YOURSELF. Insight... understanding yourself and others. INSIGHT Inventory

For Banks. Results Report. For: Sample Bank. Name: Sample, Jane Date Completed: 09/26/14 Position Applied For:: Supervisor Location: Main

Pa ent and Family Advisory Group Annual Report

Developing Resilience. Hugh Russell.

Myers-Briggs: Understanding Personality Type and Communication

I'll add this task to my work queue and do it no later than the next media inquiry I field.

Overall: about 257,000 (23%) Saskatchewan residents had at least one of five chronic diseases: asthma,

USING ASSERTIVENESS TO COMMUNICATE ABOUT SEX

Converting change fatigue into workplace success

Managing the Inferen-al Possibili-es of Open Government Data. Solon Barocas and Arvind Narayanan Princeton University

TRACOM Sneak Peek. Excerpts from CONCEPTS GUIDE

City of Cleveland Mental Health Response Advisory Committee 2015 Report January 29, 2016

Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (EIQ16)

DISORDERS TASTE PERCEPTION AND SENSORY SENSITIVITY: RELATIONSHIP TO FEEDING PROBLEMS IN BOYS WITH BARTH SYNDROME

REPORT ON EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE QUESTIONNAIRE: GENERAL

S.A.F.E.T.Y. TM Profile for Joe Bloggs. Joe Bloggs. Apr / 13

Leadership Beyond Reason

THE 5-MINUTE PERSONALITY TEST L O G B

The Power Of Self-Belief

White Supremacy Culture

Candidate: Joanne Sample Company: Abc Chemicals Job Title: Chief Quality Assurance Date: Jan. 29, 2017

Developing Yourself to Your Highest Potential

The Strengths Workshop. Steps to Living Your Callings. I am: Add Your Favorite Strengths. Overcoming Overload By Living Your Strengths.

Transcription:

Hartman Value Profile Self An Evalua on of Thinking Styles Based on Wayne Carpenter's research and extensions of the Hartman Value Profile Report for: Sample Report Date: 12/16/2016

Table of Contents Thinking Science... 3 Thinking Style Dimensions... 4 Thinking Clarity and A en on... 5 World Thinking Style... 6 Self Thinking Style... 7 Overview of Your Thinking Style... 8 Communica ng Your Thinking Styles... 9 Priori zed Strengths... 10 Priori zed Development... 11 Ac on Plan... 12 2

Thinking Science The Hartman Value Profile (HVP) assessment is not a psychological, intelligence, or ap tude test. Unlike many self report assessments, this assessment objec vely captures your thinking pa ern. This thinking style report documents your brain's natural selec on process when making decisions. Understanding the ability to process informa on is directly linked to strengths and poten al blocks to performance. Thinking and mental processing ability, like musical talent or sports talent, can be learned and improved. Some talents can be great assets in some situa ons, but can become a hindrance in other situa ons. 3

Thinking Style Dimensions Your thinking ability is reflected in how you access your talents, skills, and a tudes across the core thinking style dimensions. Your overall thinking style is a result of the blend of your world and self thinking processes. This sec on of the report defines the three core world and self dimensions. The three core thinking dimensions of People, Task, and Systems are exhibited as follows: People (Intui ve Thinking) is measured by assessing Empathy and Self Esteem Task (Prac cal Thinking) is measured by assessing Prac cal Judgment and Role Awareness Systems (Conceptual Thinking) is measured using Systems Judgment and Self Direc on The table below provides a defini on for each of these dimensions. Core Dimensions World Dimensions Self Dimensions PEOPLE Intui ve Thinking Empathy Ability to see, understand, appreciate, and value others. Ability to relate easily to and make intui ve judgments about others. Self Esteem Ability to see, understand, appreciate, and accept one's worth as a unique individual. TASKS Prac cal Thinking Prac cal Judgment Ability to see, understand, appreciate the prac cal, func onal worth of material things. Ability to execute tasks and opera onal ac vi es to a ain short-term results. Role Awareness Ability to see and understand one's func onal worth, one's social or job role, and one's place in the world. SYSTEMS Conceptual Thinking System Judgment Ability to see, understand, and appreciate the need for systems, order, structure and standards. Ap tude for conceptual, strategic thinking and planning to a ain long-term results, big picture thinking. Self Direc on/future View Ability to see and understand one's sense of mission and commitment to inner ideas. Ability to be percep ve about self concept and purpose. 4

Thinking Clarity and A en on Clarity Clarity is a measure of your natural ability to see and understand each value dimension. The greater your clarity the more accuracy and precision you have in the judgments that are made in that dimension. Each level of clarity has its own strengths and limita ons. Crystal Clear: The ability to be very insigh ul, to dis nguish differences both good and bad, and to be sensi ve to all aspects of the dimension. Clear: The ability to be in touch with key aspects of the dimension but to overlook some aspects due to allowing some informa on in and filtering other informa on out. Visible: The ability to be in touch with and dis nguish some specific aspects of a dimension clearly but overlook or not see other aspects due to selec ve filtering. Transi on: Indicates the value dimension in ques on is likely to result in inaccurate or inconsistent decision making leading to mistakes in judgment. Unconven onal (World Dimension Only): The classifica on of unconven onal represents 'out-of-the-box' thinking or mindset. It indicates your natural ability to see things and respond to them in ways which others overlook because you think differently than others A en on A en on is a measure of your natural ability to a end to, or pay a en on to, specific informa on to make a decision. Like clarity, a en veness or ina en veness can be a strength or a limita on depending on the demands of the environment and degree of balance with the other dimensions. Over A en ve: Having a bias toward the dimension and a tendency to place a great deal of importance on the dimension. A en ve: Having a balanced and generally posi ve view of the dimension and the ability to pay a en on to the dimension without losing perspec ve of other dimensions. Cau ous: Exhibi ng cau on and skep cism regarding the dimension. Tending not to focus or rely too much on the dimension to make decisions. Ina en ve: Filtering out the dimension or not seeing the importance of it. Tending to be cri cal and undervalue the dimension. (Note: good clarity may reduce some effects of ina en veness.) The following two pages show your clarity and a en on scores for the three World Thinking Style Dimensions and the three Self Thinking Style Dimensions. Note that the direc on of the bar indicates the focus of your a en on. The statements under each bar indicate the your general strengths and limita ons for the dimension. 5

World Thinking Style Empathy (PEOPLE) - Ability to see, understand, appreciate, and value others. Ability to relate easily to and make intui ve judgments about others. Prac cal Judgment (TASKS) - Ability to see, understand, appreciate the prac cal, func onal worth of material things. Ability to execute tasks and opera onal ac vi es to a ain short-term results. System Judgment (SYSTEMS) - Ability to see, understand, and appreciate the need for systems, order, structure and standards. Ap tude for conceptual, strategic thinking and planning to a ain long-term results, big picture thinking. How you understand and value the impact your decisions will have on other people and the importance you assign to others as you make choices. Crystal Clear - You are a keenly percep ve individual who has an excellent capacity to make sound judgments about others. You are an intui ve, feeling person but you tend to relate in a cau ously discrete manner. Moreover, you are likely to open up more readily to those who meet your biases and expecta ons and can become overly cri cal of and impa ent with others especially when they do not measure up. How you understand and value results oriented, compara ve choices and the importance you assign to results as you make decisions. Unconven onal - You are a very unconven onal, non-conformist thinker who tends to see prac cal, concrete values in pa erns which others, because of a more tradi onal way of thinking, are likely to miss. You tend to be somewhat skep cal and hesitant in your thinking about prac cal ma ers and can develop a 'chip on the shoulder' a tude when things do not work out as planned. How you understand and value structure and rules and the importance you assign to the rules as you make choices. Visible - You are an individualist who will tend to overtly or covertly get things done in your own unique, crea ve, and original way. Your individualism can generate an overly skep cal and cau ous a tude which can lead to a 'chip on the shoulder' a tude when things do not work out as you expect. You may also become a reac ve or retroac ve thinker focusing on crises as they occur. 6

Self Thinking Style Self Esteem - Ability to see, understand, appreciate, and accept one's worth as a unique individual. Role Awareness - Ability to see and understand one's func onal worth, one's social or job role, and one's place in the world. Self Direc on/future View - Ability to see and understand one's sense of mission and commitment to inner ideas. Ability to be percep ve about self concept and purpose. How you currently understand and value yourself. Clear - You have a very good capacity for seeing and apprecia ng your inner self worth; however, you tend to feel that others do not give you sufficient credit for your accomplishments. You may develop feelings of self pity which can create a strong feeling that you must do more than others to be recognized and appreciated by them. How you understand and value your current role(s) in life. Clear - You have the ability to understand your social/role image but are currently in social/role transi on feeling doubts and ques ons about your social/role image or role performance. You are uncertain about what type of image or role can or will meet your expecta ons and, as a consequence, can feel frustra on and dissa sfac on. Your ac ons may shi from confidence to a lack of confidence in your current situa on. How you understand and value your future and the importance you place on your view for how that future ought to be. Clear - You are a very goal directed person who has the ability to realis cally see and set your self goals. You also have the ability to be a persistent individual who is likely to stay on target once your direc on is set. This sense of persistence, however, can turn into a stubborn insistence that your way is right regardless of current circumstances. 7

Thinking Style The following page(s) provide a general overview of your Thinking Style. Problem Solving You are great with short term problem solving and will be highly crea ve in the solu ons you seek and approaches you take. You will struggle with long term plans and being consistent as you may approach things differently every me. It may be difficult for you to s ck to a problem solving plan of ac on. You may have difficulty working in teams and will need to keep an open mind to others thoughts and opinions. Strengths Will be a prac cal problem-solver and use natural common sense thinking, but can also be inven ve and novel with ideas and methods Can focus on results and have a sense of urgency to make things happen Can iden fy immediate issues and organize your decisions around concrete goals to solve immediate problems Will communicate a strong sense of individualism and independence Can handle ques ons and problems in a prac cal and novel way Will focus conversa on around prac cal, concrete, and common sense ideas Areas for Development Can be too results and now-oriented, genera ng a lack of pa ence for dealing with other people s issues and concerns, especially those that you see as unnecessary May become forceful and compe ve in how you impose your ideas on other people, poten ally making them feel uncomfortable or pushed Tendency to overlook the non-verbal signals of others Can be impa ent and ina en ve to other people s needs and interests Can view conversa on as a compe on, responding aggressively in the defense of your ideas, regardless of the consequences You may underes mate the impact of your decisions on others and overes mate your ability to deal with other people s objec ons Can develop reac ve thinking and nega ve a tudes, especially when things do not work out as planned Sugges ons for Improvement Develop pa ence as a listener for other people s need and interests Develop an openness and pa ence for other people s ques ons and concerns Overcome personal biases and expecta ons Take me to develop trust and respect from other people Learn when to back off and allow other people me to decide Think through promises to make sure they can be kept 8

Communica ng Your Thinking Styles Now that we've iden fied your individual thinking style, you can use this informa on to make more informed and more balanced decisions. A significant challenge exists in communica ng with others effec vely if they don't think the same way we do. This page outlines some strengths and limita ons of core communica on based on your thinking abili es to build awareness and help you communicate be er with others. CORE COMMUNICATION STRENGTHS Being Fair And Consistent Treats others fairly and consistently Coopera ng And Sharing Maintains a posi ve, suppor ve a tude Willing to listen to opposing viewpoints Listening, Delega ng And Developing Gives feedback in a posi ve manner Makes certain that each person knows what is expected CORE COMMUNICATION LIMITATIONS Being Fair And Consistent Do not always see problems from all perspec ves May have difficulty dealing with conflic ng issues Coopera ng And Sharing Likely to underes mate the value of coopera on and sharing Likely to be too cri cal ideas and input from others Listening, Delega ng And Developing Is not always clear or direct in their communica ons Have difficulty assigning tasks clearly or specifically 9

Priori zed Strengths The following two pages contain descrip ons of your specific strengths based on your unique thinking style pa ern. Your top strengths are listed in order with your greatest strength first. Persistence Strong personal commitment to stay on track and complete goals and tasks regardless of what happens. Insight Into Others Keen insight into others combined with cau ously discrete a tudes generates cau ous op mism about others. A tude Toward Others Cau ously discrete a tude that stays in touch with the posi ve and nega ve poten al of others. Intui ve Insight Very Good ability for relying on intui ve insight and inner 'gut' feelings for iden fying and solving problems. Self Assessment The ability to realis cally see and understand how to u lize personal strengths in situa ons. Self Control The ability to maintain composure in difficult prospec ng, interview, or closing situa ons. Sensi vity To Others Very Good understanding and acceptance of others generates cau ously discrete but fair treatment of others. 10

Priori zed Development This sec on contains descrip ons of your poten al limita ons based on your unique thinking style pa ern. Your top limita ons are listed in order with your most significant limita on first. Seeing Poten al Problems Lack of balance or focus in their thinking can lead them to overlook crucial issues. Health/Tension Index Inner directed, self-directed thinking can generate anxiety frustra on and despair. A en on To Policies & Procedures Unconven onal, spontaneous prac cal thinking leads them to challenge standards simply for the sake of the challenge. Results Oriented Unconven onal, cau ous thinking can create an inconsistent focus on results and immediate circumstances. Short Range Planning Natural skep cism can cause you to discount the need for planning especially on a day-to-day, tac cal basis. Conceptual Organiza on A tendency to discount the need for order and structure can cause your thinking to become disorganized and confused. A en on To Concrete Detail Pays a en on only to what is important to them, to their agenda and priori es. 11

Ac on Plan Please use the informa on from your Thinking Style Report to consider and complete the following ac on plan. 1. Based on your assessment results, what new insights do you have in regard to your Thinking Style? 2. What do you feel are your greatest strengths related to your Thinking Style? 3. What poten al limita ons and biases have you iden fied in rela on to your Thinking Style? 4. Based on what you have learned about your Thinking Style, what are three things you are going to do differently to op mize your performance in the future? 12