Sonoma County Five Year Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health (MCAH) Needs Assessment Survey of Health Care & Human Service Professionals, March 2009

Similar documents
Sonoma County Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health. Annual Report for FY

Santa Barbara 2015 Title V Community Assessment Maternal Child & Adolescent Health. Presented by Sandra Copley, MCAH Director

Oral Health Care in California: State of the State. Dissemination Workshop August 4,2011

MATERNAL, CHILD, AND ADOLESCENT HEALTH PROGRAMS

Center for Oral Health. Engagement in Oral Health Work for Vulnerable Populations May 4, 2016

An Entry Point For Dental Care

Building a Community Dental Health Network 75% Cavity Free 5 Year Olds by 2020 UCSF DPH 175-February 28,2017

Butte County Maternal Wellness Workgroup

Health System Members of the Milwaukee Health Care Partnership

Maternal Emotional Wellness Resource Guide

Community Health Needs Assessment for the Greater Brockton CHNA

Priority Area: 1 Access to Oral Health Care

Oral Health Assessment Handbook

2014 Butte County BUTTE COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT

STATES BEST PRACTICES IN IMPROVING STATE ORAL HEALTH PROGRAM WORKFORCE CAPACITY

Exploring Denti-Cal Provider Reimbursement and its Impact on Access to Dental Care for California s Children

Community Health Needs Assessment: Implementation Plan

Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme, the United Nations Population Fund and the United Nations Office for Project Services

Dental Public Health Activities & Practices

Perinatal Substance Use: Evidence for Current Practice. Karen Clemmer, MCAH Coordinator, Sonoma County

Partnerships and collaboration for a strong primary health care system

California. Maternal and Child Health Block Grant 2018

2012 Assessment of St. Lucie County s Social, Health, and Public Safety Services

517 Individuals 23 Families

Dental Health Disparities: What Can We Do in Alameda County?

Franklin County The Health of Our Communities

5 Public Health Challenges

Oklahoma City-County WELLNESS SCORE: occhd.org

Wellness Foundation Conference September 25, 2013 Nancy Frappier Wellness Center Coordinator Homeless Prenatal Program San Francisco, CA

Development of a Community Wide Health Care Plan for Uninsured and Underinsured Manatee County Residents

Snapshot 2016 COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT

LPHA Contractor: Wright County Health Department. LPHA Administrator/Director or Designee: Tracy Hardcastle. Report Prepared By:

Community Action Partnership of Sonoma County Healthy Tomorrows Final Report

Preconception Health in North Carolina. February 13, 2012 Perinatal Health Committee Child Fatality Task Force

Washtenaw Coordinated Funding. Investment Summary

Rockford Health Council

Chapter 7 Health: Health and Access To Care

Washington County Community Health Needs Assessment August 2014

Prince George s County Health Department Health Report Findings

USING SECRET SHOPPER SURVEYS TO ASSESS AND IMPROVE ACCESS TO REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES: THE SAN FRANCISCO EXPERIENCE

Payment Innovation and Health Center Dental Programs: Case Studies from Three States

Dear Friend of SAY, Together, we are making a difference. Matt Martin, Executive Director

CHAPTER 14 ORAL HEALTH AND ORAL CARE IN ADULTS

Maine s Safe Families Partnership Initiative

Working Towards Addressing Women s Health Disparities in Arizona

County Health Rankings Baldwin County 2016 Graphics of County Health Rankings Include All Counties In the North Central Health District

Nutrition & Physical Activity Profile Worksheets

Moving Towards a Continuum of Services. Plumas County Alcohol & Drug Strategic Planning Process DRAFT PLAN

Rebecca King, DDS, MPH NC State Dental Director Section Chief, Oral Health Section

Clark County Community Health Status Assessment

HealtheCNY Indicator List by Data Source

County Health Rankings Monroe County 2016

Annual Report. Fiscal Year 2010 July 1, 2009 June 30, Dorchester County Health Department

Advancing Health Equity: Building Capacity on the Neighborhood Level

Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme, the United Nations Population Fund and the United Nations Office for Project Services

Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive

County Community Risk Profile: Spokane County

Why Are We Concerned About Adolescents Particularly Adolescent Girls and Young Women and HIV?

Violence Prevention: Rethinking the Standard of Care for Family Planning

Jefferson Healthcare Rural Health Dental Clinic

SAN FRANCISCO PERINATAL & NEWBORN PERTUSSIS AND FLU COLLABORATIVE

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 2 METHODOLOGY Appendix 1 Comparison of Peer Counties... 6

CANNABIS IN ONTARIO S COMMUNITIES

Health of the City & Community Health Improvement Planning. Raynard Washington, PhD, MPH Chief Epidemiologist

5/26/2016 BEXAR TAB REMEMBERS TRANSLATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD ABOUT THE BEXAR TAB BEXAR COUNTY TAB: CHALLENGES & SUCCESSES

Washington State Collaborative Oral Health Improvement Plan

2014 PRC Community Health Needs Assessment

Marie Stopes International A human rights-based approach to reduce preventable maternal mortality and morbidity

PHACS County Profile Report for Searcy County. Presented by: Arkansas Center for Health Disparities and Arkansas Prevention Research Center

Pediatric Oral Health in North Dakota

2014 Healthy Community Study Executive Summary

RURAL HEALTH CARE. Lanis L. Hicks Professor Department of Health Management and Informatics. October 9, 2002

UCLA OB/GYN Clinic offers women. a comfortable, caring and confidential

WASHINGTON STATE COMPARISONS TO: KITSAP COUNTY CORE PUBLIC HEALTH INDICATORS May 2015

Community Health Status Assessment

Triple P Shasta County

Connecticut Office of Rural Health

2018 Community Health Assessment

Innovative Interprofessional Pediatric Dentistry Curriculum & Infant Oral Care Program Address Disparities in Oral Health

Summary of the Health Needs in Rugby Borough

Major Grants FY18 Total: $1,469,000

Shawnda Schroeder, PhD and Nathan Fix, MPH

Jefferson County School Based Health Centers Participation Report

Oral Health Matters The forgotten part of overall health

Overview of CARE Programs in Malawi

Contemporary Maternal-Newborn Nursing: 8 Edition Test Bank Ladewig

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Coalition C/o American Public Health Association 800 I Street NW Washington, DC,

BARBARA AVED ASSOCIATES

Florida Department of Health: Oral Health Workforce

Mike Plunkett DDS MPH OHSU School of Dentistry

Somerset County Community Health Needs Assessment August 2014

Hampshire Local Welfare Assistance

Needs Assessment of People Living with HIV in the Boston EMA. Needs Resources and Allocations Committee March 10 th, 2016

ISSUE BRIEF: ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE Crawford County

STD/HIV Program Update

OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK. for the Global Strategy for Women s, Children s and Adolescents Health

Plan for a Healthier Allegheny. June 30, 2016

Prince Albert Parkland Regional Health Authority Immunization coverage

Transcription:

Reported profession of those completing the MCAH Needs Assessment Profession Survey N % Total responses 149 100% Other Health Care Professional (HCP) 44 29.5% Social worker 25 16.8% PHN 15 10.1% Psychologist/MFT 14 9.4% Health educator 12 8.1% RN 10 6.7% Advocate 9 6.0% MD/DO 7 4.7% Registered dietician 5 3.4% Certified nurse midwife 4 2.7% Nurse practitioner/pa 3 2.0% Licensed nurse midwife 1 0.7% A total of 149 people responded to the MCAH Needs Assessment Professional Survey via survey monkey. Sub analyses were conducted by profession and region of work/practice for those categories with responses of 7 or more. Reported place of work of those completing the MCAH Needs Assessment Professional Survey Place of work N % Total responses 155 100% Public Health 29 18.7% Human Services Agency 26 16.8% Community Based Organization 25 16.1% Other 23 14.8% Clinic 22 14.2% Private practice 13 8.4% Hospital 9 5.8% Youth Development 8 5.2% Place of work: The highest proportion of respondents work in public health. There were 155 responses for 149 respondents indicated that some individuals selected multiple places of work. 1

Reported region of work/practice of those completing the MCAH Needs Assessment Professional Survey Area work/practice N % Total responses 319 100% Central 127 39.8% Northern 46 14.4% Southern 53 16.6% West 48 15.0% East 45 14.1% Regionally: There were 319 responses for 149 respondents indicating that many participants work in more than one region of the county. Reported number of client/family contacts/month of those completing The MCAH Needs Assessment Professional Survey Clienty/family contacts per month N % Total responses 148 100% Supervise staff that provides direct services 24 16.2% 1 to 50 65 43.9% 101 to 500 23 15.5% 51 to 100 22 14.9% >500 4 2.7% Do not provide client services 10 6.8% 2

Priority issues by weighted score*, MCAH Needs Assessment Professional Survey Children living in poverty Perinatal exposure to AOD Mental health in youth Early and adequate prenatal care Teen births Intimate partner violence Teen alcohol use and binge drinking Gang involvement Oral health Childhood iron deficiency anemia Low birth weight Non fatal injury hospitalizations (ages 0 14) Childhood immunizations *Score weighted by rank 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 weighted score Responses were summed for each issue by rank (highest, second highest, third highest) and weighted to produce a score. (Highest ranked issues were weighted highest and third highest weighted lowest). Children living in poverty received the greatest score of those issues presented. 3

Perception of identified strengths of those completing the MCAH Needs Assessment Professional Survey Santa Rosa Family Residence Program increases primary care in the community Sonoma County programs ensure access to Medi Cal and other economic assistance programs Existing home visiting programs improve access to essential services Promotores and community health workers help meet the needs of the underserved Families have ways to learn about and be linked to MCAH services Local coalitions are working to fulfill the health care needs of population Community clinics provide care to vulnerable women, children and adolescents Families w/greatest risk receive services c SD D A SA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Number of responses This graphic shows the relative perception of identified strengths. While it is important to know who agrees or disagrees with the information, it is also interesting to see the degree of agreement or disagreement. Most respondents agreed with the above statements but strong agreement (and low disagreement) was seen most for SR Family residency program, home visiting program, and community clinics. Conversely, there was a high degree of disagreement (even thought the majority of respondents agreed) that families have ways to learn about and be linked to MCAH services and families with greatest risk receive services. 4

Perception of identified weaknesses of those completing the MCAH Needs Assessment Professional Survey Few mental health services are available to MCAH populations Non fluoridated water contributes to dental caries Poor access to dental care for MCAH populations SD D A SA Alternative health care modalities are not well integrated Few school based health services exist Lack of coordination among agencies leads to duplication and gaps in services Medi cal reimbursement is low resulting in reduced access to health care services Poor coordination exists between agencies that serve MCAH populations Chronic illness prevention for children and adolescents is considered a low priority Lack of comprehensive services limits promotion of preconception health Public health data is limited and difficult to access 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Number of responses Again, while most respondents agreed with the above statements, a strong degree of agreement was indicated for few mental health services, poor access to dental care, and low Medi Cal reimbursement. Issues that received a higher rate of disagreement include statements about poor coordination with agencies that serve MCAH populations, data limitations and access, and chronic illness prevention as a low priority. 5

Perception of identified strengths by reported profession, Sonoma County MCAH Needs Assessment 2009 Total Advocate Health educator MD/DO RN PHN Social worker Psychologist Other_HCP Strengths SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D Families w/greatest risk receive services 55% 45% 88% 13% 73% 27% 57% 43% 70% 30% 33% 67% 54% 46% 43% 57% 53% 47% Community clinics provide care to vulnerable women, children and adolescents 86% 14% 100% 0% 82% 18% 86% 14% 90% 10% 93% 7% 76% 24% 71% 29% 91% 9% Local coalitions are working to fulfill the health care needs of population 82% 18% 86% 14% 64% 36% 57% 43% 78% 22% 86% 14% 88% 13% 86% 14% 83% 18% Families have ways to learn about and be linked to MCAH services 55% 45% 86% 14% 60% 40% 20% 80% 70% 30% 57% 43% 54% 46% 54% 46% 43% 58% Promotores and community health workers help meet the needs of the underserved 84% 16% 71% 29% 100% 0% 67% 33% 90% 10% 80% 20% 100% 0% 86% 14% 75% 25% Existing home visiting programs improve access to essential services 91% 9% 75% 25% 100% 0% 83% 17% 80% 20% 93% 7% 92% 8% 92% 8% 95% 5% Sonoma County programs ensure access to Medi Cal and other economic assistance programs 75% 25% 88% 13% 91% 9% 33% 67% 90% 10% 80% 20% 72% 28% 77% 23% 71% 29% Santa Rosa Family Residence Program increases primary care in the community 90% 10% 83% 17% 100% 0% 83% 17% 78% 22% 100% 0% 92% 8% 89% 11% 86% 14% Perception of community strengths was aggregated into strongly agree/agree (SA/A) and strongly disagree/disagree (SD/D) and stratified by profession. Highlighted in yellow are the areas where SA/A and SD/D were similar. Highlighted in blue are areas where SA/A is less than SD/D (professional probably does not think this is a strength for the community). While existing home visiting programs and SR Family Residency program had a high rate of overall agreement, agreement rates varied by profession. 6

Perception of identified strengths by region of work/practice, Sonoma County MCAH Needs Assessment 2009 Total Central North South East West Strengths SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D Families w/greatest risk receive services 55% 45% 57% 43% 60% 40% 62% 38% 66% 34% 62% 38% Community clinics provide care to vulnerable women, children and adolescents 86% 14% 85% 15% 85% 15% 85% 15% 84% 16% 85% 15% Local coalitions are working to fulfill the health care needs of population 82% 18% 82% 18% 80% 20% 81% 19% 81% 19% 85% 15% Families have ways to learn about and be linked to MCAH services 55% 45% 54% 46% 50% 50% 53% 47% 57% 43% 59% 41% Promotores and community health workers help meet the needs of the underserved 84% 16% 85% 15% 85% 15% 88% 12% 87% 13% 85% 15% Existing home visiting programs improve access to essential services 91% 9% 90% 10% 98% 2% 94% 6% 98% 2% 98% 2% Sonoma County programs ensure access to Medi Cal and other economic assistance programs 75% 25% 77% 23% 78% 22% 74% 26% 76% 24% 72% 28% Santa Rosa Family Residence Program increases primary care in the community 90% 10% 89% 11% 95% 5% 98% 2% 98% 3% 98% 2% In general, there was less of a discrepancy about community strengths by region where professional works/practices than by profession. Still, the strengths families with greatest risk receive services and families have a way to learn about and be linked to services received a relatively similar proportion of agrees to disagrees. Existing home visiting programs and SR Family residency strengths had a high degree of agreement across all regions. 7

Perception of identified weaknesses by reported profession, Sonoma County MCAH Needs Assessment 2009 Total Advocate Health educator MD/DO RN PHN Social worker Psychologist Other_HCP Weaknesses SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D Public health data is limited and difficult to access 69% 31% 86% 14% 60% 40% 67% 33% 71% 29% 53% 47% 62% 38% 88% 13% 79% 21% Lack of comprehensive services limits promotion of preconception health 82% 18% 86% 14% 63% 38% 100% 0% 80% 20% 80% 20% 79% 21% 63% 38% 92% 8% Chronic illness prevention for children and adolescents is considered a low priority 70% 30% 71% 29% 73% 27% 83% 17% 75% 25% 87% 13% 52% 48% 89% 11% 76% 24% Poor coordination exists between agencies that serve MCAH populations 61% 39% 43% 57% 63% 38% 67% 33% 56% 44% 64% 36% 70% 30% 67% 33% 64% 36% Medi cal reimbursement is low resulting in reduced access to health care services 96% 4% 88% 13% 100% 0% 100% 0% 90% 10% 100% 0% 96% 4% 91% 9% 95% 5% Lack of coordination among agencies leads to duplication and gaps in services 79% 21% 71% 29% 73% 27% 100% 0% 56% 44% 93% 7% 84% 16% 80% 20% 77% 23% Few school based health services exist 93% 7% 71% 29% 100% 0% 100% 0% 90% 10% 93% 7% 96% 4% 67% 33% 100% 0% Alternative health care modalities are not well integrated 94% 6% 71% 29% 100% 0% 100% 0% 78% 22% 100% 0% 95% 5% 91% 9% 95% 5% Poor access to dental care for MCAH populations 92% 8% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 89% 11% 87% 13% 100% 0% 89% 11% 85% 15% Non fluoridated water contributes to dental caries 76% 24% 100% 0% 78% 22% 100% 0% 50% 50% 86% 14% 79% 21% 75% 25% 74% 26% Few mental health services are available to MCAH populations 93% 7% 88% 13% 100% 0% 100% 0% 89% 11% 92% 8% 96% 4% 92% 8% 92% 8% In general, there was a consensus of agreement about identified weaknesses in the community. Nurses (RN and PHN) were more likely to disagree about issues identified as community weaknesses, possibly because they work in public health and are more aware of service/resource availability. Reimbursement rates for Medi Cal received the highest rate of agreement for all possible community weaknesses. The lowest rates of agreement were for poor coordination between agencies that serve MCAH populations. 8

Perception of identified weaknesses by region of work/practice, Sonoma County MCAH Needs Assessment 2009 Total Central North South East West Weaknesses SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D SA/A SD/D Public health data is limited and difficult to access 69% 31% 70% 30% 72% 28% 68% 32% 74% 26% 62% 38% Lack of comprehensive services limits promotion of preconception health 82% 18% 84% 16% 79% 21% 78% 22% 77% 23% 74% 26% Chronic illness prevention for children and adolescents is considered a low priority 70% 30% 74% 26% 76% 24% 68% 32% 66% 34% 67% 33% Poor coordination exists between agencies that serve MCAH populations 61% 39% 62% 38% 66% 34% 61% 39% 62% 38% 62% 38% Medi cal reimbursement is low resulting in reduced access to health care services 96% 4% 96% 4% 95% 5% 96% 4% 95% 5% 91% 9% Lack of coordination among agencies leads to duplication and gaps in services 79% 21% 77% 23% 83% 17% 71% 29% 73% 27% 80% 20% Few school based health services exist 93% 7% 92% 8% 95% 5% 94% 6% 95% 5% 93% 7% Alternative health care modalities are not well integrated 94% 6% 92% 8% 95% 5% 93% 7% 95% 5% 93% 7% Poor access to dental care for MCAH populations 92% 8% 92% 8% 93% 7% 94% 6% 90% 10% 93% 7% Non fluoridated water contributes to dental caries 76% 24% 73% 27% 75% 25% 72% 28% 68% 32% 71% 29% Few mental health services are available to MCAH populations 93% 7% 93% 7% 98% 2% 92% 8% 95% 5% 93% 7% Across regions in the county, there was a consensus of agreement about identified weaknesses in the county. In every region, Medi Cal reimbursement received > 90% agreement rate. The lowest rates of agreement were for poor coordination between agencies that serve MCAH populations. 9

Top three priority issues by rank and reported profession, Sonoma County MCAH Needs Assessment 2009 Health Priority Issues Total Advocate educator MD/Do RN PHN Social worker Psychologist Other_HCP Early and adequate prenatal care 2 3 3 3 Perinatal exposure to AOD 2 3 2 1 1 3 2 Low birth weight 2 Children living in poverty 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 1 Mental health in youth 3 2 1 3 1 2 Teen births 2 2 Teen alcohol use and binge drinking 2 Other 2 In general, children living in poverty was the leading priority indicated by professionals. This problem was among the top three for all professionals who responded to the survey. Perinatal exposure to AOD and mental health in youth were also leading issues for the majority of respondents. Top three priority issues by rank and region of work/practice, Sonoma County MCAH Needs Assessment 2009 Priority Issues Total Central North South East West Early and adequate prenatal care 3 2 Intimate partner violence Perinatal exposure to AOD 2 2 2 2 3 3 Children living in poverty 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mental health in youth 3 3 3 2 2 2 Teen births 3 By region, the leading priority was overwhelmingly children living in poverty followed by perinatal exposure to AOD and mental health in youth. 10