Eleven blackberry cultivar trial and varietal specific susceptibility to certain pathogens: Report to NABG Research Foundation

Similar documents
Fusarium wilt of strawberry. Tom Gordon

APPLE (Malus domestica Stayman Winesap, Idared, Granny Smith ) K. S. Yoder, A. E. Cochran II,

Efficacy of Selected Acaricides on Spider Mites in Corn 2011

Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri Kuwayama) and citrus greening disease: Understanding the vector-pathogen interaction for disease management

Etiology and Management of Limb Dieback of Figs in California

Cedar-apple rust; Gymnosporangium juniperi-virginianae and J.K. Repass

AP249 Biological control of apple powdery mildew. Shane Dullahide Queensland Department of Primary Industries

Section 5: Wheat Scab Research

SMALL FRUIT DISEASES (Commercial)

Canker diseases of grapevine

In-depth studies initiated: Results:

Update from Israel on the Polyphagous Shot Hole Borer and its Fusarium fungal symbiont

Codling moth (CM) is becoming an increasing problem

San Jose Scale Management in North Carolina Peaches. Jim Walgenbach Dept. Entomology NC State University Mt Hort Crop Res & Ext Ctr Mills River, NC

Thermo-Therapy and Use of Biofungicides and Fungicides for Management of Internal Discoloration of Horseradish Roots

Insecticide Efficacy for Pecan Aphids. Larry Blackwell 1 Brad Lewis 1,2 Tiffany Johnson 1 1 New Mexico State University 2 New Mexico Dept.

Predicting Pest Activity with Degree-Day Models

REPORT TO THE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE OREGON PROCESSED VEGETABLE COMMISSION December 2010 Project Title: Management of Fusarium

Tree and Shrub Disease

Annual Report Prepared for the California Pear Board

The Efficacy of Spraying Organic Fungicides to Control Fusarium Head Blight Infection in Spring Wheat

Introduction to Pecan Diseases and General Management

Auburn University Study

Managing Spider Mites in Almonds. David Haviland Entomology Farm Advisor UC Cooperative Extension, Kern Co.

Cucurbit Downy Mildew Early Warning Scouting Program Project Report October 2007

Arkansas Fruit and Nut News Volume 5, Issue 6, 13 July 2015

EFFICACY OF NEW PESTICIDES AGAINST SIXSPOTTED MITE EOTETRANYCHUS SEXMACULATUS (RILEY) (ACARI: TETRANYCHIDAE) ON AVOCADOS

Crop Disease Management Row Crop Short Course March 1 st, 2018

Wheat Update September 2017 ARKANSAS WHEAT PERFORMANCE TRIALS AND VARIETY SELECTION. Methods

Possible climate change impact on occurrence of Aspergillus flavus on spelt wheat in Serbia

Pest Management in Organic Soybeans-Paul Hunter and Wayne Wangness Farms-2002

Scheduling copper applications and management of greasy spot and alternaria brown spot

Drought Irrigation Strategies For Pistachio. David A. Goldhamer Robert H. Beede

2018 Peach Insect Management Update. Jim Walgenbach Dept Entomology & Plant Pathology MHCREC, Mills River, NC

Grafting cucumbers for resistance to Fusarium wilt in Australia. Jonathan Lidbetter, Len Tesoriero and Joshua Jarvis

STALK COLD TOLERANCE OF COMMERCIAL SUGARCANE VARIETIES DURING THE HARVEST SEASON

Insect Management in Mississippi Pecans

Plant Pathology Fact Sheet

Section 2: Barley Scab Research

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

In vitro inhibition of potato fungal pathogens using isothiocyanates

Insecticides Labeled for Control of Bean Leaf Beetle, Mexican Bean Beetle, and Green Cloverworm. Amount product per acre

Outbreak of European brown rot on Montmorency tart cherry

Seed Treatment Products

Insect Management in Blueberries

Survey of grape powdery and downy mildew sensitivity to commonly used fungicides,

Control of Codling Moth and Other Pear Arthropods with Novaluron Evaluation of Novaluron for Phytotoxicity to Pear and Apple 2004

Section 4: Milling and Baking Quality

CONTROL OF SPIDER MITES IN APPLE AND TART CHERRY WITH ACARICIDES. Diane G. Alston Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT

Nutrient Management in Subtropical Tree Crops. The avocado model

Reducing russeting of organically grown Elstar to increase quality

EAR AND KERNEL ROTS. When to look for: Mid-August to October (and during storage)

P.J. Cotty, Page NO.1 of 8.

Fungicide control of Apple Scab 2014 field trial

Nutritional and Sensory Analysis of Raspberry Varieties Grown in Northern Nevada

Evaluation of Assail for the Control of Early Season Cotton Aphids in Upland Cotton COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT 2001

Tomato Spray Program and Other Disease Control News. Steve Bost Extension Plant Pathologist University of Tennessee

2007 Powdery Mildew of Cantaloupe Fungicide Trial

Host resistance for managing soilborne diseases in strawberry production

Methods and Materials:

Hands-on identification of vegetable diseases: Roses

A Study of Codling Moth.Abundance As Influenced by Crop Failures

Impact of High Glucosinolate Mustard Soil Amendments on Black Bean Yield 2014

Integrated Disease Management Based on Cultivar Susceptibility

Foothill Farm and Orchard News Issue #2 October, 2001

PLUM CURCULIO: MANAGEMENT ASSUMPTIONS

Recommendations for Ambrosia Beetle and Laurel Wilt Pathogen Control

BMSB impact on vegetable and field crops in the Mid- Atlantic and research plans for 2011

Fusarium stalk rot of sorghum in the Northern region. By Lisa Keller and Malcolm Ryley, Agri-Science Qld, DEEDI, 203 Tor St Toowoomba

Fusarium root rot of soybean occurrence, impact, and relationship with soybean cyst nematode

Tailoring an IPM program for Florida Pomegranates

Nut Crop Nutrition Understanding the Principles to Optimize the Practices.

INFLUENCE OF PLANT PARTS ON IN VITRO DRY MATTER DISAPPEARANCE OF FORAGE SORGHUM SILAGES. J. White and K.K. Bolsen

Spotted wing drosophila in North Carolina 2013 Update

Title of Project Identifying Marketable Attributes in Arkansas Fresh-Market Blackberries

Lewis Mite, Thrips and Lygus Research Update

Pear Scab in Oregon Symptoms, disease cycle and management

PSB FIELD ASSAYS. 1 Trial No. 23 Ref no: IPL/KHA/SH/PPX/54 2 Product PS Bacteria 2 % A.S. 3 Crop Name Sorghum

Vegetable and Fruit Disease Update

Navel Orangeworm Control: Looking Back, Looking Forward. David Doll UCCE Merced County

GAINES COUNTY IPM NEWSLETTER Manda G. Cattaneo, Extension Agent - IPM 101 S. Main RM B-8. Seminole, TX 79360

Citrus Disease ID and Control. Ben Faber UC Cooperative Extension

Agronomic In-Service Training

Control of Occasional Insect Pests in Organic Blueberries. Oscar E. Liburd. Entomology and Nematology Department University of Florida

Mite Management Strategy and Miticide Resistance

Relationship of leaf and fruit transpiration rates to the incidence of spongy tissue disorder in two mango (Mangifera indica L.

Rice Stink Bug Control with Selected Insecticides

2012 Evaluation of Insecticides for Lygus Bug Control in Blackeye Cowpeas

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CARBON SOURCES ON THE GROWTH OF DIFFERENT ISOLATES OF FUSARIUM OXYSPORUM f. sp. CUBENSE IN DIFFERENT MEDIA

THRIPS EFFICACY TRIALS IN SOUTH GEORGIA. J. D. Griffin, J.R. Ruberson, R.J. Ottens and P.M. Roberts Dept. of Entomology, Univ. of Georgia Tifton GA

Mathematical models are a powerful method to understand and control the spread of Huanglongbing

Potato virus Y. Positive sense RNA virus Potyviridae. Transmitted by several aphid species in a non-persistent, non-circulative manner

Investigation into the etiology of decline of Raywood ash in Northern California

EVALUATION OF NEW AND EXISTING INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF WALNUT HUSK FLY 2012

Managing Flea Beetles in Canola Julie Soroka

Eggplant, Pepper, and Tomato. Early Blight. Identification and Life Cycle. Plant Response and Damage

Volume XII, Number 17 September 18, Silver Scurf and Black Dot Development on Fresh Marketed Russet Norkotah Tubers in Storage

Certificate of Mold Analysis

PERFORMANCE OF VARIETY MN1 IN MALAWI

Transcription:

Eleven blackberry cultivar trial and varietal specific susceptibility to certain pathogens: Report to NABG Research Foundation Part 1; Blackberry cultivar performance trial David Ouellette, Brian Lawrence and Juan Carlos Melgar, Clemson University Summary. Horticultural performance of eleven blackberry cultivars, including two primocane-fruiting cultivars was evaluated over three years after planting. Bloom dates were affected by annual environmental conditions although the bloom period was similar among years. Natchez had the highest yield per plant, followed by Navaho, Von, and Osage, although yield declined over the three years of the study for Natchez and remained fairly consistent for Osage. Primocane-fruiting cultivars had very low yields except in year two (first year in production), with Prime-Ark Traveler having the lowest yield per plant among all cultivars. Narrative. A blackberry cultivar trial was planted in 2015 at the Clemson University s Musser Fruit Research Center (MFRC), in Seneca SC. This trial comprised the following eleven cultivars: Prime-Ark Freedom, Prime-Ark Traveler, Arapaho, Natchez, Osage, Ouachita, Navaho, Von, Apache, Triple Crown and Chester. Plants were grown in a two-wire system, and there were 15 plants per cultivar, with three replications of five plants per cultivar in a randomized complete block design. In-row plant spacing was three feet. Bloom and harvest dates, and fruit yield and weight were recorded over three years. 50% bloom ocurred between April 5 and May 10 in 2016 and April 4 and May 11 in 2017 (Table 1). In 2018, spring temperatures fluctuated remarkably with cycles of warm and cold weather that caused a delay of bloom and harvest dates of one week and up to ten days for some cultivars (Table 1). All cultivars went from 50% to 90% bloom in a period of 3-8 days, independently of the year. Table 1. 50% and 90% bloom dates for 11 blackberry cultivars (2016-2018) 50% 90% 50% 90% 50% 90% Prime-Ark Freedom 5-Apr 8-Apr 4-Apr 9-Apr 13-Apr 18-Apr Prime-Ark Traveler 14-Apr 19-Apr 11-Apr 17-Apr 16-Apr 24-Apr Arapaho 18-Apr 20-Apr 15-Apr 20-Apr 27-Apr 2-May Natchez 14-Apr 19-Apr 13-Apr 16-Apr 25-Apr 1-May Osage 14-Apr 21-Apr 11-Apr 19-Apr 25-Apr 1-May Ouachita 20-Apr 25-Apr 20-Apr 25-Apr 30-Apr 4-May Navaho 26-Apr 29-Apr 24-Apr 28-Apr 4-May 9-May Von 25-Apr 28-Apr 25-Apr 28-Apr 6-May 11-May Apache 21-Apr 25-Apr 20-Apr 22-Apr 4-May 8-May Triple Crown 10-May 12-May 1-May 5-May 16-May 20-May Chester 10-May 13-May 8-May 11-May 22-May 30-May The first crop was produced in 2016. Harvest season of the floricane fruit started on May 13, with Prime- Ark Freedom being the first cultivar producing fruit, and finished on August 11 with Apache and Chester being the last ones in being harvested (Table 2). Overall, the harvest season lasted between four

and six weeks for most cultivars, with a shorter season for the cultivars producing fruit in May and a longer season for those harvested in June and July. The length of the harvesting season increased in 2017 and 2018 (second and third year, respectively), with most cultivars producing blackberries over six to eight weeks (Table 2). Primocane fruit was also harvested from Prime-Ark Freedom and Prime-Ark Traveler between July and August in 2016, and between May and Jun (Table 3). Table 2. First and last date of harvest of floricane fruit from 11 blackberry cultivars (2016-2018) First Last First Last First Last Prime-Ark Freedom 13-May 13-Jun 19-May 26-Jun 25-May 22-Jun Prime-Ark Traveler 19-May 16-Jun 22-May 5-Jul 25-May 18-Jul Arapaho 25-May 21-Jun 22-May 5-Jul 25-May 11-Jul Natchez 27-May 28-Jun 22-May 13-Jul 25-May 18-Jul Osage 31-May 6-Jul 25-May 25-Jul 29-May 24-Jul Ouachita 6-Jun 13-Jul 29-May 25-Jul 4-Jun 25-Jul Navaho 9-Jun 13-Jul 5-Jun 9-Aug 8-Jun 14-Aug Von 13-Jun 3-Aug 19-Jun 15-Aug 12-Jun 14-Aug Apache 16-Jun 11-Aug 8-Jun 9-Aug 15-Jun 1-Aug Triple Crown 24-Jun 3-Aug 22-Jun 9-Aug 19-Jun 8-Aug Chester 1-Jul 11-Aug 5-Jul 22-Aug 3-Jul 29-Aug Table 3. First and last date of harvest of primocane fruit from Prime-Ark cultivars (2016-2018) First Last First Last First Last Prime-Ark Freedom 7-Jul 11-Aug 5-Jul 9-Aug 11-Jul 8-Aug Prime-Ark Traveler 13-Jul 11-Aug 18-Jul 22-Aug 18-Jul 29-Aug Cultivars such as Prime-Ark Freedom, Prime-Ark Traveler, Arapaho, Natchez, and Apache had their highest yield in 2016 (Table 4). Afterwards, yield steadily declined through the years. Osage also had its highest yield in 2016 although was fairly consistent from year to year, and yield was still the highest among all varieties in 2018. Prime-Ark Freedom had some freeze damage in 2017 and was not very productive in 2018 either. Prime-Ark Traveler was planted three weeks later than the other cultivars and this contributed to its low yield in 2016. Severe tip dieback in years 2017 and 2018 reduced yield in these two years (see second part of the narrative on blackberry primocane tip dieback). Natchez had the highest accumulated yield among all cultivars over the three years of the study, followed by Navaho and Von. Table 5 shows estimated fruit yield per acre based on the yield per plant.

Prime-Ark Freedom had the greater fruit weight among all cultivars (Table 6). Independently of yield, fruit weight was very consistent for Prime-Ark Freedom over the three years of study. This was not the case for other cultivars such as Osage, Ouachita, Von and Triple Crown, as these cultivars showed a declining fruit weight throughout the study, even for cultivars that had similar yield between different years. Table 4. Fruit yield (lb/plant) of 11 blackberry cultivars for the first three years of production Accumulated yield Prime-Ark Freedom 22.1+0.8 z 2.5+4.6 6.6+0.6 37.2 Prime-Ark Traveler 10.8+0.9 7.2+3.7 4.9+1.4 28.9 Arapaho 20.4 7.9 7.2 35.5 Natchez 26.6 15.2 11.5 53.3 Osage 16.1 12.6 13.4 42.1 Ouachita 14.2 14.3 7.6 36.1 Navaho 15.9 20.9 11.0 47.8 Von 15.6 20.6 10.6 46.8 Apache 17.2 8.9 4.0 30.1 Triple Crown 13.0 18.6 6.1 37.7 Chester 5.9 26.3 9.1 41.3 z Values for Prime-Ark Freedom and Prime-Ark Traveler include yield from floricane (first value) and primocane (second value) fruit

Table 5. Estimated yield (lb/acre) of 11 blackberry cultivars for the first three years of production Accumulated yield Prime-Ark Freedom 15,344 4,745 4,451 24,540 Prime-Ark Traveler 7,783 7,297 3,287 18,367 Arapaho 13,649 5,246 4,835 23,748 Natchez 17,806 10,156 7,709 35,671 Osage 10,804 8,461 8,977 28,242 Ouachita 9,537 9,611 5,071 24,219 Navaho 10,672 14,018 7,385 32,075 Von 10,421 13,793 7,090 31,304 Apache 11,541 5,994 2,712 20,247 Triple Crown 8,711 12,480 4,098 25,289 Chester 3,921 17,615 6,117 27,653 Table 6. Average fruit weight of 11 blackberry cultivars (2016-2018) Prime-Ark Freedom 9.7/11.6 9.7/10.6 9.8/7.8 Prime-Ark Traveler 7.1/5.3 5.9/5.2 6.2/4.2 Arapaho 5.8 5.3 5.3 Natchez 8.4 6.9 7.1 Osage 6.0 5.7 5.3 Ouachita 6.8 6.2 5.9 Navaho 5.5 5.3 5.0 Von 6.2 5.5 5. Apache 7.7 8.0 7.4 Triple Crown 7.8 6.7 6.6 Chester 4.8 5.3 4.7

Part 2; Blackberry primocane tip dieback: Potential causes and cultivars affected Mengjun Hu and Guido Schnabel, Clemson University Summary. Severe tip dieback was observed in 2016 in a cultivar trial block on Prime-Ark Traveler blackberry cultivar at the Musser Fruit Research Center (MFRC), Seneca, SC and in other locations, including one more location in SC and one in VA. Secondary pathogens such as Alternaria and Fusarium were consistently isolated from affected tissue and controlled experiments did establish a cultivar-specific sensitivity of canes to these pathogens. Mites and thrips were observed that year in all locations sampled and an increase in insecticide applications and establishment of mite control at MFRC resulted in no tip dieback symptoms the following year. We hypothesize that the secondary pathogens were enabled to do damage in 2016 as a consequence of insect and/or mite damage. This research establishes the importance of insect and mite management to control tip dieback of some blackberry cultivars. Narrative. Tip dieback was first observed in years prior on the blackberry cultivar Arapaho (http://ucanr.edu/blogs/blogcore/postdetail.cfm?postnum=8030), and was believed to be of physiological cause based on an interaction between the cultivar and cooler climates. Recently, similar primocane tip dieback was observed on blackberry cultivars grown at the Musser Fruit Research Center (MFRC) in Seneca, South Carolina. Heavily affected cultivars include Prime-Ark Traveler, Arapaho, and Osage. Fruit workers in Virginia, Arkansas, and Pennsylvania also reported the same issue on Prime- Ark cultivars. The symptoms usually contain 2 to 4 inches of wilt, followed by a blackening of the tip. The issue seems to be only restricted to the top 4 or 5 inches (Fig. 1). The incidence of tip dieback at the MFRC varied between cultivars (Table 1). Most frequently affected was Prime-Ark Traveler (Table 1), but other cultivars including Apache, Arapaho, Osage, Ouachita, and Prime-Ark Freedom were also affected. However, Chester and Navaho seemed unaffected. During 2016 very few insecticide applications were made and no miticides were applied. No tip dieback was observed in the same trial in 2017. Fig. 1. Primocane tip dieback. Fig. 2. Fungal spores obtained from dieback samples (Photo by Lauren Darnell).

Certain fungi may have been involved in the occurrence of the observed dieback. We found signs of pathogens in form of spores on the symptomatic cane tips from the MFRC and from tissue obtained from an experimental block at Virginia Tech. Spores observed varied in size and shape (Fig. 2), indicating that several different fungi were involved. We conducted fungal isolations and sequenced the ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Regions 1 and 2 to identify the pathogens to the genus level (Table 2). Results indicated consistent presence of Alternaria and Fusarium species as well as occasional isolations of Botryosphaeria, Pestalotiopsis, and Phomopsis (Table 2). Cultivar susceptibility to the pathogens consistently isolated in 2016 was investigated by inoculating detached primocane tips. Similar to our field observation, Prime-Ark Traveler was one of most susceptible cultivars in this assay. Navaho, Osage, and Von were also highly susceptible to Alternaria (Table 3). The experiment was repeated in 2017, however, no symptoms were recorded on any of the cultivars inoculated with the same Alternaria isolate. Inoculations with Fusarium conducted in 2017 also did not yield symptoms (data not shown). Table 1 Incidence of tip dieback on different blackberry cultivars a. Tip dieback incidence Cultivars Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Mean Apache 25 35 15 25 ± 8.2 Arapaho 25 50 15 30 ± 14.7 Chester 0 0 0 0 Natchez 0 0 0 0 Navaho 10 10 15 11.7 ± 2.4 Osage 20 25 50 31.7 ± 13.1 Ouachita 10 40 30 26.7 ± 12.5 Prime-Ark Traveler 65 70 80 71.7 ± 6.2 Prime-Ark Freedom 40 15 15 23.3 ± 11.8 Triple Crown 5 5 0 3.3 ± 2.4 Von 55 5 0 20 ± 24.8 a Data based on 20 primocanes of each of 3 replicates of each cultivar. Table 2 Plant pathogens isolated from symptomatic tips a Fungi VA SC location 1 SC location 2 Alternaria x x x Botryosphaeria x x - Fusarium x x x Pestalotiopsis x x - Phomopsis x - - a fungi were identified by ITS sequencing; x indicates the presence of the pathogen. It is still unclear what caused the tip dieback in 2016 at the MFRC, Virginia, and other locations. Entomologists at University of Arkansas have found that broad mites were associated with terminal and lateral damages on Prime-Ark cultivars. Such damage may have provided a gateway into the plant tissue for the otherwise weak cane pathogens Alternaria and Fusarium. According to the MFRC spray records, no miticides were used on the blackberries with dieback symptoms in 2016 and broad mites were observed. In contrast, the insecticide Delegate was applied in 14 day intervals in 2017 together with a single miticide application (Acramite) when mites flared up. The management of thrips (Delegate) and mites (Acramite) may therefore be responsible for the lack of tip dieback in 2017.

Table 3 Symptom expression (%) and lesion length (cm) of detached primocanes collected in 2016 and 2017 after inoculation with an Alternaria isolate collected in 2016 2016 2017 Cultivar Symptom expression Lesion length Symptom expression Lesion length Apache 40 3.8 0 0 Arapaho 50 3.3 0 0 Chester 12.5 0.6 0 0 Natchez 0 0 0 0 Navaho 100 4.5 0 0 Osage 80 4.6 0 0 Ouachita 8.3 1.0 0 0 Prime-Ark Freedom 50 4.6 0 0 Prime-Ark Traveler 90 5.1 0 0 Triple Crown 20 1.25 0 0 Von 80 4.8 0 0