Indolent mucoid carcinoma of stomach

Similar documents
Muco-epidermoid tumours of the anal canal

Gastric Cancer Histopathology Reporting Proforma

Serotonin- and Somatostatin-Positive Goblet Cell Carcinoid of the Duodenum

Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach Clinicopathological

In-situ and invasive carcinoma of the colon in patients with ulcerative colitis

Abstracting Upper GI Cancer Incidence and Treatment Data Quiz 1 Multiple Primary and Histologies Case 1 Final Pathology:

Gastroenterology Tutorial

Basaloid carcinoma of the anal canal

Surface carcinoma of the stomach

Goseki histological grading of gastric cancer is an important predictor of outcome

Mixed glandular and squamous-cell carcinoma

Pre-operative assessment of patients for cytoreduction and HIPEC

GOBLET CELL CARCINOID. Hanlin L. Wang, MD, PhD University of California Los Angeles

GOBLET CELL CARCINOID

Imaging in gastric cancer

Oat-cell carcinoma of the oesophagus: a recently recognized entity

Gastrointestinal pathology 2018 lecture 4. Dr Heyam Awad FRCPath

COLON AND RECTUM SOLID TUMOR RULES ABSTRACTORS TRAINING

Colon and Rectum: 2018 Solid Tumor Rules

Greater Manchester & Cheshire Guidelines for Pathology Reporting for Oesophageal and Gastric Malignancy

Tumours of the Oesophagus & Gastro-Oesophageal Junction Histopathology Reporting Proforma

Case Scenario 1. The patient has now completed his neoadjuvant chemoradiation and has been cleared for surgery.

Greater Manchester and Cheshire HPB Unit Guidelines for the Assessment & Management of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disease Chapter 14

Anatomic and pathological aspects in the pathology of malignant gastric tumors

Perforated duodenal ulcer in Reading from 1950 to 1959

Cancer of the Stomach

Polyps in general: is a descriptive term of forming a mass that is exophytic & polypoid.

Small Intestine. Protocol revision date: January 2005 Based on AJCC/UICC TNM, 6 th edition

Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer

Formula One Study. Assessment criteria of pathological parameters. Ver.2. UK Japan Joint Study for Risk Factors of Lymph Node

Long survival after carcinoma of the stomach

The Incidence and Significance of Villous Change in Adenomatous Polyps

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer in Young Patients

Histopathology: gastritis and peptic ulceration

MULTIPLE PRIMARY CANCERS: PRIMARY MALIGNANT LYMPHOMAS AND CARCINOMAS OF THE INTESTINAL TRACT IN THE SAME PATIENT

polyps of the colon and rectum

Upper GIT IV Gastric cancer

Primary enteric adenocarcinoma with predominantly signet ring features of the lung: A case report with clinicopathological and molecular findings

Histological appearances of the gastric mucosa

National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit New Patient Registration sheet Patients with Oesophageal High Grade Glandular Dysplasia

Metastatic mechanism of spermatic cord tumor from stomach cancer

Gastric Carcinoma in Young Adults. Hitoshi Katai, Mitsuru Sasako, Takeshi Sano and Keiichi Maruyama

J of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci/ eissn , pissn / Vol. 3/ Issue 24/June 16, 2014 Page 6628

Specialist Referral Service Willows Information Sheets. Cancer in cats and dogs: Assessment of the patient

Clinicopathological and prognostic differences between mucinous gastric carcinoma and signet-ring cell carcinoma

Rectal biopsy as an aid to cancer control in ulcerative colitis

Intrarenal Extension. sinus

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome with metastasizing duodenal carcinoma

Adenocarcinoma of gastro-esophageal junction - Case report

DOCTORAL THESIS (SUMMARY)

Joseph Misdraji, M.D. GI pathology Unit Massachusetts General Hospital

Stage 4 gastric adenocarcinoma icd 10

University Journal of Pre and Para Clinical Sciences

Case Scenario year-old white male presented to personal physician with dyspepsia with reflux.

Lymph node audit on Ivor-Lewis Oesophagogastrectomy specimens - November 2013 to October 2014.

Objectives. Atypical Glandular Cells. Atypical Endocervical Cells. Reactive Endocervical Cells

RECONSTRUCTION OF THE CARDIA AND FUNDUS OF THE STOMACH

The surface mucous cells and the cardiac and pyloric glands secrete mucus which protects the stomach from self-digestion.

CARCINOMA OF THE STOMACH A CLINICAL STUDY

Disorders of Cell Growth & Neoplasia. Histopathology Lab

WHY CANCER IS NOT RECOGNIZED EARLY'

Rectal Cancer Cookbook Update. A. JOURET-MOURIN with the collaboration of A Hoorens,P Demetter, G De Hertogh,C Cuvelier and C Sempoux

Disclosures. Outline. What IS tumor budding?? Tumor Budding in Colorectal Carcinoma: What, Why, and How. I have nothing to disclose

CT EVALUATION OF GASTRIC LESIONS:

Central Poorly Differentiated Adenocarcinoma of the Maxilla: Report of a Case

Basement membrane in lobule.

Ileo-rectal anastomosis for Crohn's disease of

Prostate Pathology: Prostate Carcinoma, variants and Gleason Grading (Part 1)

Peritoneal Involvement in Stage II Colon Cancer

Maram Abdaljaleel, MD Dermatopathologist and Neuropathologist University of Jordan, School of Medicine

Large Colorectal Adenomas An Approach to Pathologic Evaluation

duodenal ulcer by vagotomy and gastric drainage operation

Pathology of Treated GI Neoplasia

Case: The patient is a 24 year- old female who was found to have multiple mural nodules within the antrum. Solid and cystic components were noted on

THE SPREAD OF RECTAL CANCER AND ITS EFFECT

Histopathogenesis of intestinal metaplasia: minute

came from a carcinoma and in 12 from a sarcoma. Ninety lesions were intrapulmonary and the as the chest wall and pleura. Details of the primary

Differences in the mode of the extension of gastric

Primary mucinous adenocarcinoma developing in an ileostomy stoma

DOCTORAL THESIS SUMMARY

Oesophagus and Stomach update dysplasia and early cancer

GASTRIC CANCER DR AMIR ASHRAFI

Thyroid pathology Practical part

The Pathology Museum

Case Report Five-Year Survival after Surgery for Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Stomach

COLLECTING CANCER DATA: STOMACH AND ESOPHAGUS

Tagawa, Yutaka; Kawahara, Katsunobu. Citation Acta medica Nagasakiensia. 1991, 36

Exfoliative cytology of diffuse mesothelioma

Question: If in a particular case, there is doubt about the correct T, N or M category, what do you do?

Update on staging colorectal carcinoma, the 8 th edition AJCC. General overview of staging. When is staging required? 11/1/2017

Hereditary Gastric Cancer

Epithelial tumors. Dr. F.F. Khuzin, PhD Dr. M.O. Mavlikeev

International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research

Gastrointestinal pathology 2018 lecture 2. Dr Heyam Awad FRCPath

Characteristics of intramural metastasis in gastric cancer. Tatsuya Hashimoto Kuniyoshi Arai Yuichi Yamashita Yoshiaki Iwasaki Tsunekazu

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF COLON AND RECTAL CANCERS IN SENTINEL LYMPH NODE MAPPING

SMALL BOWEL ADENOCARCINOMA. Dr. C. Jeske

Malignant colorectal polyps: venous invasion and

Upper GI Malignancies Imaging Guidelines for the Management of Gastric, Oesophageal & Pancreatic Cancers 2012

S rectal polyps that show atypia, adenocarcinoma,

Transcription:

J. clin. Path., 1974, 27, 536-541 Indolent mucoid carcinoma of stomach W. L. BRANDER', P. R. G. NEEDHAM, AND A. D. MORGAN From the Department of Histopathology, Westminster Medical School, London synopsis In a review of 574 cases of gastric carcinoma, 50 (8'7 Y.) proved to be mucoid using defined microscopic criteria. Three histological types were recognized: pure signet-ring cell carcinoma (three cases); tumour of mixed pattern (41 cases); and an easily recognized, well differentiated type (six cases). This last group pursued an indolent course and had a mean survival time of nine years compared with mean survival times in the other two groups of five and 18 months respectively. Carcinoma of the stomach arises from mucussecreting cells of normal gastric mucosa or from areas of intestinal metaplasia (Morson and Dawson, 1972). Many tumours secrete mucus, which may be intracellular (the so-called 'signet-ring' appearance) or extracellular in which the tumour cells are suspended in abundant pools of mucus. Such growths are often bulky (see fig 1) and may present a semitranslucent, glistening appearance when cut across, which has been variously termed mucoid, colloid, mucinous, or gelatinous, and indiscriminate usage by different authors has led to some confusion. Morson and Dawson (1972) use the term 'well differentiated colloid carcinoma' to denote that type of growth with predominantly extracellular mucin, and 'poorly differentiated' for the signet-ring variety. Fisher and Hoerr (1954) apply 'mucinous' to the former type and 'colloid' to the latter. Stout (1953) regards the terms as synonymous, pointing out that no one has defined how mucinous a tumour must be to justify its inclusion in a special category; what is more important, he sees no virtue in such a subdivision. In the series of cases reviewed here we define our histological criteria for the term 'mucoid' and present evidence that a small but distinct group of highly differentiated mucoid carcinomas of the stomach pursue an indolent course and have a prognosis considerably better than the average gastric cancer. Histological Classification of Mucoid Carcinoma The histological sections of 574 cases of carcinoma of the stomach, either biopsied (17 cases) or resected 'Present address: Department of Pathology, Guy's Hospital Medical School, London SE1 9RT. Received for publication 24 April 1974. (557 cases) at the Westminster and Gordon Hospitals between 1939 and 1970 were reviewed and in the first instance separated into mucoid and non-mucoid groups. The criterion for inclusion in the mucoid group was that 50% or more of the bulk of the tumour represented in the sections was epithelial mucus, either intracellular or extracellular. This arbitrary criterion was chosen because it was felt that, while some tumours which might be called 'mucoid' would be excluded, all those which conformed to this standard would be worthy of the title 'mucoid' whatever criteria were adopted. Three categories were recognized: 1 Pure signet ring type, in which the mucus is wholly intracellular displacing the nucleus to one side of the cell (fig 2). 2 A pure 'well differentiated' mucoid carcinoma in which the whole of the primary and its metastases consist of lakes of extracellular mucus in which the tumour cells float singly or in groups (fig 3). Individual cells may be bloated with mucus in the general form of a signet-ring cell but they tend to be larger than those of (1) and often appear degenerate, with ill defined cell and nuclear membranes and pyknotic nuclei (fig 4). Epithelial structures may be formed consisting of tubules or ribbons of very well differentiated cells (fig 5), each structure or group of structures separated from other tumour cells by the extracellular mucus. The groups of tubular formations are never large. The advancing edge of the tumour is rounded or 'pushing' as described by Monafo, Krause, and Medina (1962) and consists of mucus often containing very few tumour cells (fig 6). 3 A mixed pattern which may include areas like (1) or (2) mingled with other histological patterns either anaplastic or variably differentiated glandular 536

Fig 1 Frr+* T'r+ r-rc---t Ilt-ili i - t... f- is 4 3 2 ":!,r V :..._ i 2 '1 3 =M =_I3; t----- -_ I t L.-±- -.--.4 1 - ---5. % 4t, k*, Ift. J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.27.7.536 on 1 July 1974. Downloaded from http://jcp.bmj.com/ Fig 2 Fig 1 Mucoid carcinoma destroying gastric muscle and extending to cut duodenal end ofspecimen (left). The patient survived gastrectomy for nine years (case 1). Actual size. Fig 2 Pure 'signet-ring' carcinoma. H.E. x 225. Fig 3 Well differentiated mucoid carcinoma composed largely of extracellular mucus. The clinical course was indolent (case 4). HE x 30. on 11 March 2019 by guest. Protected by copyright.

538 Fig 4 High-power view of tumour seen in fig 3, with tumour cells floating in mucus showing some of the cytological appearances described in the text. HE x 500. types. A few tumours in this group conform in large part to the pattern of (2) (well differentiated mucoid carcinoma) but include a focus, either in the primary or in a lymph node metastasis, which is more cellular and contains little or no mucus (fig 7). The stromal reaction was also noted (Inokuchi, Inotsuka, Furusawa, Soejima, and Ikeda, 1967). The extent and spread of each tumour at the time of operation was taken into account and correlated with the survival time of the patient. In calculating mean survival times patients dying within three months of operation were excluded, as in most cases early death is a result of surgical complications rather than the disease (Hawley, Westerholm, and Morson, 1970). Results Of 574 gastric carcinomas reviewed, 50 (8-7 %) were W. L. Brander, P. R. G. Needham, and A. D. Morgan Fig 5 Lymph-node metastasis from tumour shown in figs 3 and 4, showing abundant extracellular mucin, and an incomplete acinus lined by highly differentiated tumour cells. HE x 125. classified as mucoid. Forty-one of these were of mixed pattern, six well differentiated and only three of pure signet-ring type. The age at operation and sex of the patient are shown in table I. Treatment in 49 of the 50 cases was by partial or total gastrectomy; one of the signet-ring tumours was found to be inoperable and was merely biopsied. Type of Tumour Age at Sex No. of Operation Cases M F Signet ring 51-80 3 0 3 (mean 65 9) Mixed 37-83 24 17 41 (mean 62-8) Well differentiated 45-76 6 0 6 mucoid (mean 58) Table I Age and sex distribution of50 cases of mucoid carcinoma

Indolent mucoid carcinoma of stomach Fig 6 Fig 7 Fig 6 Mucoid carcinoma of indolent type showing masses of extracellular mucin indenting gastric muscle. Similar tumour tissue extended to cut end ofspecimen (case 3). HE x 30. Fig 7 Mucoid carcinoma of 'mixed' type, with much extracellular mucus in some areas but showing transition to a more cellular growth pattern. HE x 125. The largest group of patients, those with mucoid carcinoma of mixed pattern, had a mean survival of 18 months, and even excluding those cases with distant metastases at the time of operation this period could be extended to 21 months only. The three cases of signet-ring pattern had a mean survival of five months. These figures are in contrast with the six cases of well differentiated mucoid carcinoma where the mean survival was nine years, even including those with lymph-node involvement (see table I1). The length of the preoperative case history in these cases did not differ significantly from that of other groups, and varied from four months to several years. The stromal Case Age at Operation Extent of Spread Survival after Operation Cause of Death (years) Through Stomach Lymph Node Wall Involvement 1 49 + - 9 Local recurrence, postoperative septicaemia 2 70 + + 9 Pneumonia; no clinical recurrence 3 76 + Tumour in cut end 8 Pneumonia; no tumour found of specimen 4 45 + + 15 Local recurrence; carcinomatosis 5 50 - - 10 + Lost to follow up - 6 58 + - 3 Local recurrence; carcinomatosis Table II Follow up of six cases of well differentiated mucoid tumour 539

540 reaction varied from tumour to tumour and from one area to another within the same tumour but was never sufficiently intense to be remarkable. CASE REPORTS Case I Mr A.S. presented, aged 48, with a four months' history of epigastric discomfort. Barium meals disclosed a mass in the pyloric antrum of the stomach (see fig 1) and he underwent a partial gastrectomy on 17 August 1939. Histology showed a well differentiated mucoid carcinoma which had penetrated the muscle coats but did not involve local lymph nodes. He remained well until November 1948 when he was found to have a recurrence of the tumour. This was resected but he died of septicaemia one week later. At necropsy there was tumour in abdominal lymph nodes only. Case 2 Mr F.L. presented, aged 70, with eight months' history of diarrhoea and occasional vomiting. He was found to have a gastric carcinoma and a Billroth I gastrectomy was performed on 24 June 1952. The tumour was in the pyloric antrum and proved to be a well differentiated mucoid carcinoma involving local lymph nodes. He remained well and clinically free from recurrence until his death from pneumonia in his eightieth year. A necropsy was not performed. Case 3 Mr G.V. presented at the age of 76 with a four-month history of epigastric discomfort. At a Billroth I gastrectomy on 27 October 1973 a mucoid tumour was found in the pyloric antrum (fig 6). Lymph nodes were not examined but the sections showed tumour extending to the cut end of the duodenum. In spite of this incomplete excision he remained well for over eight years, dying at the age of 84 from bronchopneumonia. At necropsy there was no evidence of tumour. Case 4 Mr K.H. presented, aged 45, with a long history of epigastric discomfort, having noticed a mass in his abdomen. A carcinoma arising from the lesser curve was excised by partial gastrectomy on 23 July 1957. This mucoid tumour involved local lymph nodes. He remained well until 1972 when he developed a local recurrence (confirmed by biopsy at laparotomy) from which he died 15 years and 7 months after his first operation. There was no necropsy. Case S Mr F.G. presented with many years' history of W. L. Brander, P. R. G. Needham, and A. D. Morgan dysphagia at the age of 50. On 19 February 1958 a carcinoma of the pylorus was resected by a Billroth I gastrectomy at another hospital. The tumour was confined within the muscle coats and local lymph nodes were not invaded. He continued to be followed and in 1965 the gastrectomy was revised because of a postgastrectomy syndrome. Biopsies were taken and there was no evidence of recurrent tumour. He was last seen in 1968 ten years after resection of the carcinoma and was well. He has since been lost to follow up. Case 6 Mr E.C., aged 58, presented with a four months' history of vomiting and retrosternal pain and more recently the onset of dysphagia. A barium meal showed a mass at the lower end of the oesophagus extending into the stomach. A partial gastrectomy and oesophagectomy was performed on 22 November 1968 but a few months later his symptoms recurred. He was found to have a stricture at the oesophago-gastric anastomosis and this was dilated on several occasions but no biopsies were taken. He remained reasonably well until three years later when he began to lose weight and his condition slowly deteriorated until he died from carcinomatosis three years and six months after resection. There was no necropsy. Discussion It is widely reported that mucoid carcinoma of the stomach has a poor prognosis (Hoerr, Hazard, and Bailey, 1966; Morson and Dawson, 1972) and that the microscopic appearances are of little value in assisting prognosis (Brookes, Waterhouse, and Powell, 1965; Morson and Dawson, 1972). In this series, however, we have defined a small but easily recognizable group of well differentiated mucoid carcinomas which pursue an indolent course. Willis (1967) records a case of a 'bulky gelatinous adenocarcinoma' of the pylorus in a man aged 65, who lived for seven and a half years after a laparotomy at which the tumour was considered inoperable, but he does not specifically link the microscopic appearances with the long survival. It is important to note that these well differentiated mucoid tumours constitute only 1% of resected carcinomas and 12% of mucoid carcinomas. The pathologist must be careful not to include tumours with a mixed histological pattern, for in our series we encountered three cases in which most of the tumour was of well differentiated mucoid pattern but in which there was a small area, either in the primary or in one of the lymph nodes, which was more cellular, contained less mucus, and showed a

Indolent mucoid carcinoma ofstomach more diffuse type of infiltration (fig 7). In practice only a few histological tissue blocks are necessary to reveal this type of mixed pattern. In this series the maximum number of blocks taken was six. However, without a prospective study it is impossible to make specific recommendations on the point, and we can only say that with our material it was remarkably easy to recognize the indolent, well differentiated mucoid carcinoma. We wish to thank the surgeons of the Westminster and Gordon Hospitals for permission to study these cases. We are grateful to the Department of Medical Photography for help in preparing figure 1. References Brookes, V. S., Waterhouse, J. A. H., and Powell, D. J. (1965). 541 Carcinoma of the stomach: a 10-year survey of results and of factors affecting prognosis. Brit. med. J., 1, 1577-1583. Fisher, E. R., and Hoerr, S. 0. (1955). The practical value of histopathological classification of gastric carcinoma: an appraisal based on 100 consecutive cases. Cancer (Philad.), 8, 389-395. Hawley, P. R., Westerholm, P., and Morson, B. C. (1970). Pathology and prognosis of carcinoma of the stomach. Brit. J. Surg., 57, 877-883. Hoerr, S. O., Hazard, J. B., and Bailey, D. (1966). Prognosis in carcinoma of the stomach in relation to the microscopic type. Surg. Gynec. Obstet., 122, 485-494. Inokuchi, K., Inutsuka, S., Furusawa, M., Soejima, K., and Ikeda, T. (1967). Stromal reaction around tumor and metastasis and prognosis after curative gastrectomy for carcinoma of the stomach. Cancer (Philad.), 20, 1924-1929. Monafo, W. W., Jr., Krause, G. L., Jr., and Medina, J. G. (1962). Carcinoma of the stomach. Morphological characteristics affectingsurvival. Arch. Surg., 85, 754-763. Morson, B. C., and Dawson, I. M. P. (1972). Gastrointestinal Pathology. Blackwell, Oxford. Stout, A. P. (1953). Atlas of Tumour Pathology, Sect. VI, Fasc. 21, Tumours of Stomach, pp. 65-67. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington D.C. Willis, R. A. (1967). Pathology oftumours. 4th ed., p. 396. Butterworth, London. J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.27.7.536 on 1 July 1974. Downloaded from http://jcp.bmj.com/ on 11 March 2019 by guest. Protected by copyright.