CARPENTERWORM MOTH. Insect Pest Management in Hybrid Poplars Series FS256E

Similar documents
Cydia pomonella. Do You Know? Hosts. Orchard IPM Series HG/Orchard/08 Codling Moth. by Diane G. Alston and Michael E. Reding Adult Codling Moth

Ambrosia Beetle Decline of Apricot and Plum in Michigan. Bill Shane

Tree Fruit IPM Advisory: June 20 th, 2006

Arkansas Fruit and Nut News Volume 5, Issue 6, 13 July 2015

Codling moth (CM) is becoming an increasing problem

Predicting Pest Activity with Degree-Day Models

Using pear ester to monitor codling moth in sex pheromone treated orchards

Response of adult male Zeuzera pyrina (Lep: Zeuzeridae) to different pheromone traps in walnut orchards of four isolated regions of Iran

Saskatoon fruitinfesting

Pheromone Based Mating Disruption

Making codling moth mating disruption work in Michigan: Adopting an area-wide approach to managing codling moth in Michigan apple production

PLUM CURCULIO: MANAGEMENT ASSUMPTIONS

Developing a First Detector Network for Utah. Cooperative A g Pest Sur vey Coordinator

Control of the European pepper moth using biological control

The Benefits of Insecticide Use: Walnuts

Biological Control of Two Avocado Pests Amorbia cuneana and omnivorous looper on avocado can be controlled by parasite

Advanced IPM for UT Tree Fruit

CODLING MOTH & LEAFROLLER PHEROMONE MATING DISRUPTANT KEEP OUT OF THE REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION FIRST AID STATEMENT

How to keep apple fruit worm-free Celeste Welty, Extension Entomologist, Ohio State University January 2009

Kern County Vegetable Crops

Gypsy Moth Background Information

Case Study: As the Worm Turns Speciation and the Apple Fly Maggot Introduction: Task: Final Product:

Field Identification Guide

EFFECT OF LARVAL PHOTOPERIOD ON MATING AND REPRODUCTIVE DIAPAUSE IN SEASONAL FORMS OF ANAEA ANDRIA (NYMPHALIDAE)

The Mediterranean Fruit Fly in Central America

ONGOING PROJECT REPORT YEAR 1/3 WTFRC Project # CH

Pear Scab in Oregon Symptoms, disease cycle and management

I N S E C T S FIRST FLIGHT IN THIS ISSUE... F R U I T J O U R N A L May 7, 2012 VOLUME 21, No. 9 Geneva, NY

Irradiation Quarantine Treatments for Deciduous Tree Fruits

Apple Pest Management in the West: Strategies to Deal with Inevitable Change

Development of the Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) on Douglas-fir Foliage

Determining Impact of Third Generation Codling Moth, and Emergence Pattern of Overwintered Moths

[fll ~ft:

Contract Administrator : Carolyn Yager,

Scarlet-Bodied Wasp Moth, Cosmosoma myrodora (Dyar) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) 1

SCAFFOLDS Fruit Journal, Geneva, NY Volume 20, No. 16 Update on Pest Management and Crop Development July 5, 2011

Putting Sterile Insect Technique into the Modern IPM Toolbox: Over 20 years of successful area-wide integrated pest management in Canadian pome fruit

The wheat stem sawfly a nursery tale from the shortgrass prairie

Fruit & Nut Notes Serving Solano & Yolo Counties! June Issue 5

Enhancing Biological Control to Stabilize Western Orchard IPM Systems

Project Title: Monitoring leafrollers and codling moth with one non-pheromone lure. PI: Alan Knight Co-PI: Jay Brunner

Integrated Pest Management Successes

Integrated Pest Management Successes

TF223. Dr Robert Saville East Malling Research

The use of the pheromone mating disruption method against fruit moths in private allotments

Seasonal Population Trends of Avocado Worm Pests

Shin-Etsu products: technical aspects Mating disruption control strategy in Italy

Mediterranean fruit fly

HopGuard II Section 18 Approved for Kansas

Invasive Species Update

CONTROL OF GYPSY MOTHS

From the. The Latest News from the California Avocado Industry. CAC s 40th year Read more on page 20

Update from Israel on the Polyphagous Shot Hole Borer and its Fusarium fungal symbiont

Foothill Farm and Orchard News Issue #2 October, 2001

AAll s well that ends well; still the fine s the crown; Whate er the course, the end is the renown. WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, All s Well That Ends Well

Application of synthetic sex pheromone for management of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, in cabbage

PHEROMONE-BASED CODLING MOTH AND NAVEL ORANGEWORM MANAGEMENT IN WALNUTS

ACTION PLAN. for. CUELURE ATTRACTED FRUIT FLIES including the Melon Fly Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett)

Romanian Journal of Plant Protection Vol. 1(2008)

San Jose Scale Management in North Carolina Peaches. Jim Walgenbach Dept. Entomology NC State University Mt Hort Crop Res & Ext Ctr Mills River, NC

Population Dynamics of Three Species of Genus Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) in BARI, Chakwal (Punjab)

Codling Moth Management: Yesterday and Today

Pheromone-Based Tools for Management of the Invasive Brown Marmorated Stink Bug in Specialty Crops

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

African Entomology 17(2): (2009) *To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Integrated Pest Management for Home Gardeners and Landscape Professionals. Figure 1. Adult codling moth.

Control of Codling Moth and Other Pear Arthropods with Novaluron Evaluation of Novaluron for Phytotoxicity to Pear and Apple 2004

scaffolds I N S E C T S ONCE AROUND THE BARK IN THIS ISSUE... F R U I T J O U R N A L Update on Pest Management and Crop Development

Invasive Ambrosia Beetle Conference The Situation in California August 14, 2012 PUBLIC MEETING

Volume 21, Number 10. June 4, Contents. Current degree day accumulations. Upcoming pest events. Current degree day accumulations

Kusagikamemushi in Japan

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

FIELD OBSER V A TIONS OF MA TINGS BETWEEN FEMALE LIMENITIS ARCHIPPUS AND MALE L. ARTHEMIS SUBSPECIES (NYMPHALIDAE)

The (COSHH) Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations may apply to the use of this product at work.

Effectiveness of entomopathogenic nematodes in the control of Cydia pomonella larvae in Northern Italy

Tree Fruit Pest Advisory

Ambrosia Beetle Control and Understanding How and Why they Attack Certain Plants

Developing a Management Strategy for Little Cherry Disease

Reduced rates of pheromone applications for control of codling moth (Cydia pomonella) in pear and walnut orchards

DNA and morphometric diagnostics for apple and snowberry maggot flies

2018 Peach Insect Management Update. Jim Walgenbach Dept Entomology & Plant Pathology MHCREC, Mills River, NC

Tree Fruit Pest Advisory

Larval survival and development of the peach fruit moth, Carposina sasakii (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae), in picked and unpicked apple fruits

AUGMENTATION IN ORCHARDS: IMPROVING THE EFFICACY OF TRICHOGRAMMA INUNDATION

The Benefits of Insecticide Use: Pears

Managing Flea Beetles in Canola Julie Soroka

MANITOBA HEALTH, HEALTHY LIVING & SENIORS WEEKLY WEST NILE VIRUS SURVEILLANCE REPORT (WEEK 31)

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

Biopesticide-based products and strategies for control of tree pests. Professor Tariq M. Butt

Insecticide Options for Successful Management of Emerald Ash Borer

Hervé Quénin, Pierre Laur Calliope SAS Arysta Lifescience Corporation

Mimosa Webworm in Honeylocust:

ACEP National H1N1 Preparedness Survey Results

USING AEROSOL PHEROMONE PUFFERS FOR AREA-WIDE SUPPRESSION OF CODLING MOTH IN WALNUTS: YEAR SIX

2012 Medicaid and Partnership Chart

Efficacy of CpGV on Oriental Fruit Moth (Cydia molesta): myth or reality?

Management of Selected Pests in Walnuts

FRUIT IPM UPDATE #11

Volume XII, Number 14 August 6, Late Blight Management in the Columbia Basin. Updates on Potato Psyllid and Zebra Chip (ZC)

Exposure to Ecdysone Agonist-Treated Surfaces Negatively Affects Reproduction and Orientation in Adult Moths

Transcription:

CARPENTERWORM MOTH Insect Pest Management in Hybrid Poplars Series By Eugene R. Hannon, Staff Entomologist, Fresno County Department of Agriculture, Fresno, California. R. Andrew Rodstrom, GreenWood Resources, Portland, Oregon. J.M. Chong, Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. John J. Brown, Department of Entomology, Washington State University FS256E FS256E Page 1 ext.wsu.edu

Carpenterworm Moth Prionoxystus robiniae (Peck) (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) Introduction Range Carpenterworm moths (Figure 1) have a nationwide range, excluding New England and the northern central Great Plains states. Carpenterworms are major pests of hybrid poplars in eastern Oregon and Washington. Larvae burrow into the boles of trees, weakening them and destroying heartwood. The objective of this pest sheet is to convey to professional pest managers a means to monitor moth populations and to suggest a male-trapout strategy to control the population. Taxonomy Prionoxystus robiniae is an endemic North American species that is widely distributed throughout US and Canada (Solomon and Hay 1974). Prionoxystus robiniae is not the only Cossidae that attacks poplar. Acossus centerensis (Lintner) is named the poplar carpenterworm and can be found from Maine west to Montana, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, and Colorado in the US, and from Quebec west to Alberta in Canada (Carolin 1977; University of Alberta 2016). Another species, Acossus populi (Wik) is called the aspen carpenterworm and is found from coast to coast (Baker 1972). Zeuzera pyrina (L.), the leopard moth, is an invasive species from Massachusetts to Pennsylvania that has been in the US since 1909 (Howard and Crittenden 1909) and attacks poplar (Baker 1972). Two burrowing Lepidoptera pests of poplar have the same species name: robiniae. These are the western poplar clearwing moth, Paranthrene robiniae, and the carpenterworm moth, Prionoxystus robiniae. Hosts Prionoxystus robiniae feeds on a variety of deciduous trees; including oak (Quercus), birch (Betula), ash (Fraxinus), black locust (Robinia), elm (Ulmus), maple (Acer), willow (Salix), cottonwood (Populus), pecan (Carya), and less commonly on fruit trees such as cherry (Prunus), peach (Prunus), apricot (Prunus), and pear (Pyrus) (Solomon and Hay 1974; Solomon 1988). Prionoxystus robiniae are primarily found in older, often previously damaged trees (USDA 1989). Figure 1. Adult female carpenterworm moth. (Photo by E.R. Hannon.) Life Stages After hatching, larvae quickly grow and can reach a size of 2.5 cm within a month (Solomon 1967b). Burrowing galleries during larval development are the damaging portion of the life cycle. The larvae bore into the heartwood of the tree, pushing frass and detritus out of the entrance hole. The tunnels are formed in an upward direction and are enlarged steadily as the larva grows. Larvae have a minimum of seven instars, but can go through up to 30 instars (Solomon 1988). Unlike most Lepidoptera, P. robiniae larvae may undergo stationary molts until the correct environmental conditions trigger pupation. The larvae pupate near the gallery exit, and the pupal exuvia may be found protruding from the exit hole. This species overwinters as larvae in various instars. Larvae reach full length after seven instars (Solomon 1973). At room temperature (24 C) the pupal period lasts 11 20 days (Forschler and Nordin 1989). In the southern states, one to two years are required for the P. robiniae to go through its life cycle, while in the northern states it requires two to four years (USDA 1989). Sexual dimorphism exists (Figure 2). FS256E Page 2 ext.wsu.edu

Females have a much larger wingspan (6 8.5 cm) than males (4.3 6 cm), and the hind wings of males are orange with a black outer border. Sexual dimorphism also occurs in larvae (Figure 3); mature male larvae weigh 1.50 ± 0.03 g, while female larvae weigh 5.10 ± 0.08 g (Hannon 2006). Females usually mate once but can mate up to four times, and males are capable of mating several times (Solomon and Neel 1973). Male and female P. robiniae moths live only four to five days as adults (Forschler and Nordin 1989). Figure 2. The larger female carpenterworm moth on the left and the smaller male carpenterworm moth on the right. Note the orange hind wings on the male moth. (Photo by J. Brown.) Life History The egg stage lasts 11 13 days at 22 26.6 C (Solomon 1967a). Larval development time in the laboratory (24 C), from hatch to eclosion, was approximately 300 days (Forschler and Nordin 1989). When reared at 20.6 C under laboratory conditions, the length of time between egg and adult took 330 days for males and 349 days for females (Hannon 2006). P. robiniae takes two to four years to develop in northern climates, but can complete its development in a single year in the southern part of its range (Hay 1968; Solomon and Hay 1974). Females completing development in one year have a smaller clutch size than those developing in two years, with approximately 500 eggs being laid for the former group compared to 800 eggs for the latter (Solomon and Neel 1974). Under field conditions in the interior Pacific Northwest, wild P. robiniae require two years to complete their life cycle (Hannon 2006). In eastern Oregon and eastern Washington there is only one flight per year. Adults emerge between late April and early August, with the main emergence peak occurring in late June. The females mate shortly after emerging and live only a few days. Egg deposition occurs where mating takes place and studies indicate that they prefer rough bark (Solomon and Neel 1973). The greatest percentage of eggs laid is during the first day (Solomon and Neel 1974). Eggs are laid in several different clutches (2 6) and may contain anywhere between 100 200 eggs per clutch (Solomon and Neel 1974). Larvae (Figure 3) are easily sexed (Leppla et al. 1979). Prionoxystus robiniae have a 1:1 sex ratio (Forschler and Nordin 1989), though long-term studies in populations that have both one- and two-year life cycles indicate that the sex ratio can be 5:1 (male: female) the first year and 1:2 (male: female) the second year (Solomon 1976). Figure 3. Female ultimate instar larva on the left is much larger than the male larva on the right. (Photo by E.R. Hannon.) Damage Larvae cause damage by boring into the wood, which results in discoloration and weakening of the trunk. The tree is weakened structurally by the large tunnels in the heartwood, and may snap off during windy conditions. Other insects and pathogens may gain entrance to the tree through the holes made by larvae and further weaken the tree. In trees grown for lumber, the quality of the resulting lumber is degraded by tunnels (Figures 4 and 5). In the southern United States, P. robiniae ranks among the most damaging species to oak timber production (Donely 1974; Morris 1977). In addition to the galleries, wood surrounding these galleries is often stained (Solomon and Toole 1971) and downgraded for paper pulp purposes. Figure 4. Larval galleries in heavily infested bole of poplar tree. (Photo by E.R. Hannon.) FS256E Page 3 ext.wsu.edu

Monitoring The sex pheromone of the female carpenterworm moth is a 9:1 ratio of Z3-E5-tetradodecenyl acetate and E3-E5- tetradodecenyl acetate (Solomon et al. 1972; Doolittle and Solomon 1986). The adult male P. robiniae flight season can be monitored by using bucket traps baited with 1 mg of synthetic sex pheromone, plus a toxicant strip (dichlorvos) in the bucket to kill captured moths (Hannon 2006). Figure 5. Gallery with a female carpenterworm larva (Photo by J. Brown) life. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Biological Control Two species of entomophagous nematodes (Steinernema carpocapsae Weise and S. feltiae Bovien) have been reported to be effective control agents (Forschler and Nordin 1988) of P. robiniae larvae. Nematodes can be injected directly into the galleries. An ichneumonid parasitoid has been found attacking P. robiniae larvae in the interior Pacific Northwest, but the degree of suppression by this wasp is uncertain at this time. We formally submitted our parasitoid specimens to be identified by Dr. Robert W. Carlson, an ichneumonid specialist at the Smithsonian Institution/USDA. Dr. Carlson identified digital photographs of our adult specimens as Lissonota sp. In 1915, Rohwer described a parasitoid species reared from P. robiniae in Virginia, and originally this species was designated Amersibia prionoxysti Rohwer. It was later moved into the genus Lissonota (Carlson 1979). It is likely that our specimens are Lissonota prionoxysti (Rohwer). There have been two reported hymenopterous parasitoids of P. robiniae. These are L. prionoxysti (Rohwer) and Pterocormus devinctor (Say) (updated species reference within Solomon [1995] citing Carlson [1979]). At this point we do not know the distribution of these species. Thus, we do not know whether P. devinctor could occur in the plantations in Oregon and whether or not our specimens of L. prionoxysti are common in our area. The Hymenoptera catalog (Carlson 1979) only mentions their location as Virginia. We do know that this parasitoid species is also found in eastern Kentucky, where Hay and Morris (1970) reported that L. prionoxysti reduced carpenterworm moth emergence by 12%. Accumulated degree-day (ADD) calculations were made using two different methods to estimate the first male trap catch (i.e., biofix) and for peak trap catch during the flight season at the hybrid poplar plantations near Boardman, OR. The first degreeday calculating method used simple averaging: (max + min)/2 10 C, where max and min are the daily maximum and minimum temperature and 10 C was the lower developmental threshold temperature. The second calculating method used the single sine-wave method (Baskerville and Emin 1969). For both methods, a lower developmental threshold of 10 C, as reported by Solomon and Neel (1972), was used. No upper threshold was used for either method as this information is unknown, but temperatures within the tree never exceeded 25 C (Hannon 2006). For the biofix calculations, ADD accumulations were initiated on January 1, as Solomon and Neel (1972) noted this start date gives the lowest variation between years and thus the greatest predictability. To obtain ADD values for the peak flight season, ADD accumulations were reset to zero at the biofix and allowed to once again accumulate. Solomon and Neel (1972) found the first adult emergence to occur at 610±31 F (~321±88 C) degree-day heat units in the state of Mississippi using the simple averaging method. Management Carpenterworm larvae feed within the non-living heartwood of the trees, so systemic insecticides are ineffective. Contact insecticides would have to target the adult moth population that flies between May through July, and, even if successful in one year, the effort would need to be repeated two more years because of the multiple year life cycle. FS256E Page 4 ext.wsu.edu

The cost of producing enough synthetic sex pheromone prohibits a mating disruption strategy, but sex pheromones can also be used to trap out males of a pest species. Theoretically, this would have the same effect as mating disruption; mating is either delayed (Knight 1997; Vickers 1997) or prevented when fewer males are in the area. Carpenterworm moths eclose and mate in June and July. Males can be captured in bucket traps baited with 1 mg of synthetic sex pheromone. Two publications have reported success in using a mass trapping strategy to control Cossidae (carpenterworm moth family). Faccioli et al. (1993) had success controlling Cossus cossus L., a pest of apple and forest in Europe, by placing ten pheromone baited traps per hectare (four/acre) in infested plantations. Hegazi et al. (2009) reported that a mass trapping effort caused a 90% decrease in active galleries of the leopard moth (Zeuzera pyrina L.), another Cossidae attacking olive trees (and poplar), and resulted in a significant increase in olive fruit production. In eastern Oregon, 270 acre units were targeted for a carpenterworm male moth trap-out effort in 2010 2011. During two years of trapping out male carpenterworm moths, populations of P. robiniae were significantly reduced in both the treated fields and in untreated adjacent fields. Furthermore, populations of this pest were suppressed for at least three years in treated fields even after the trap-out effort had stopped, though in the untreated adjacent fields the populations did not remain suppressed (Rodstrom 2013). Acknowledgements This research was supported by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) Competitive Grant no. 2011-68005- 30407 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA). References Baker, W.L. 1972. Eastern Forest Insects. USDA-FS, Misc. Publ. #1175 Vol. 116-1200, page 388. Baskerville, G.L., and P. Emin. 1969. Rapid Estimation of Heat Unit Accumulation from Maximum and Minimum Temperatures. Ecology 50: 514 517. Carlson, R.W. 1979. Ichneumonidae, Stephanidae, Evanioidae, Trigonaloidea. In Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico: Vol. 1., Symphyta and Apocrita (Parasitica), K.V. Krombein, P.D. Hurd, Jr., D.R. Smith, and B.D. Banks, eds. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press: 315 741. Carolin, V.M. 1977. Western Forest Insects. Volume 1339. Page 132. Donely, D.D. 1974. Woodborer Losses in Appalachian Oak. Southern Lumberman 229: 115 116. Doolittle, R.E., W.L. Roelofs, J.D. Solomon, R.T. Carde, and M. Beroza. 1976. (Z,E)- 3,5- Tetradecadien-1-ol Acetate Sex Attractant for the Carpenterworm Moth, Prionoxystus robiniae (Peck) (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 2: 399 410. Doolittle, R.E., and J.D. Solomon. 1986. Stereoselective Synthesis of (Z, E) 3,5- Tetradecadienyl Acetate: Sex Attractant for Carpenterworm Moth, Prionoxystus robiniae (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) and Effect of Isomers and Monounsaturated Acetates on Its Attractiveness. Journal of Chemical Ecology 12: 619 634. Faccioli, G., E. Pasqualini, and P. Baronia. 1993. Optimal Trap Density in Cossus cossus (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) Mass- Trapping. Journal of Economic Entomology 86: 850 853. Forschler, B.T., and G.L. Nordin. 1988. Suppression of Carpenterworm, Prionoxystus robiniae (Lepidoptera: Cossidae), with the Entomophagous Nematodes, Steinernema feltiae and Steinernema bibionis. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 61: 396 400. Forschler, B.T., and G.L. Nordin. 1989. Techniques for Rearing the Wood Borers Prionoxystus robiniae Lepidoptera Cossidae and Paranthrene dollii Lepidoptera Sesiidae. Florida Entomologist 72: 224 226. Hannon, E.R. 2006. Developing an IPM Program to Control the Carpenterworm Moth and Poplar-and-Willow Borer in Irrigated Hybrid Poplars. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Entomology, Washington State University. Hay, C.J. 1968. Frass of Some Wood-Boring Insects in Living Oak (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae; Lepidoptera: Cossidae and Aegeriidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 61: 255 258. Hay, C.J., and R.C. Morris 1970. Carpenterworm. Forest Pest Leaflet 64. Washington, DC: US. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. FS256E Page 5 ext.wsu.edu

Hegazi, E., W.E. Khafagi, M. Konstantopoulou, D. Raptopoulos, H. Tawfik, G.M. Abd El-Aziz, S.M. Abd El- Rahman, A. Atwa, E. Aggamy, and S. Showeil. 2009. Efficient Mass-Trapping Method as an Alternative Tactic for Suppressing Populations of Leopard Moth (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 102: 809 818. Howard, L.O., and F.H. Crittenden. 1909. The Leopard Moth. USDA Department of Entomology, Circular #109. Knight, A.L. 1997. Delay of Mating of Coddling Moth in Pheromone Disrupted Orchards. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 20: 203 206. Leppla, N.C., J.D. Solomon, and W.J. Pons. 1979. Sexing Carpenterworm Larvae. Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society 14: 145 148. Morris, R.C. 1977. Insect-Caused Degrade in Hardwood Lumber. Southern Lumberman 234: 19 20. Rodstrom, R.A. 2013. Epigeal Insect Communities and Novel Pest Management Strategies in Pacific Northwest Hybrid Poplar Plantations. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Entomology, Washington State University. Rohwer, S.A. 1915. Amersibia prionoxysti. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 49: 224. Solomon, J.D. 1967a. Carpenterworm Oviposition. Journal of Economic Entomology 60: 309. Solomon, J.D. 1967b. Rearing the Carpenterworm, Prionoxystus robiniae, in the Forest (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 60: 283 285. Solomon, J.D. 1973. Instars in the Carpenterworm, Prionoxystus robiniae. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 66: 1258 1260. Solomon, J.D. 1976. Sex Ratio of the Carpenterworm Moth ( Prionoxystus robiniae) (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). The Canadian Entomologist 108: 317 318. Solomon, J.D. 1988. Influence of Host on Larval Survival, Feeding Habits, and Adult Fecundity of the Carpenterworm (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 81: 834 839. FS256E Page 6 ext.wsu.edu

Use pesticides with care. Apply them only to plants, animals, or sites as listed on the label. When mixing and applying pesticides, follow all label precautions to protect yourself and others around you. It is a violation of the law to disregard label directions. If pesticides are spilled on skin or clothing, remove clothing and wash skin thoroughly. Store pesticides in their original containers and keep them out of the reach of children, pets, and livestock. Copyright 2017 Washington State University WSU Extension bulletins contain material written and produced for public distribution. Alternate formats of our educational materials are available upon request for persons with disabilities. Please contact Washington State University Extension for more information. Issued by Washington State University Extension and the U.S. Department of Agriculture in furtherance of the Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914. Extension programs and policies are consistent with federal and state laws and regulations on nondiscrimination regarding race, sex, religion, age, color, creed, and national or ethnic origin; physical, mental, or sensory disability; marital status or sexual orientation; and status as a Vietnam-era or disabled veteran. Evidence of noncompliance may be reported through your local WSU Extension office. Trade names have been used to simplify information; no endorsement is intended. Published April 2017. FS256E Page 7 ext.wsu.edu