SAFE AT DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS AND USE PATTERNS. Polycarbonate beverage containers. Typical migration level less than 0,005mg/kg (5ppb)

Similar documents
BPA-based materials, such as polycarbonate and epoxy resins, have a huge socioeconomic

FAQs on bisphenol A in consumer products

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

Opinion. of the Scientific Committee on Food

DANIEL R. DOERGE U.S. Food and Drug Administration National Center for Toxicological Research Jefferson, AR

BISPHENOL A (BPA) RISK MANAGEMENT APPROACH: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR BPA-HEALTH COMPONENT DECEMBER, 2018 HEALTH CANADA.

FOOD CONTACT COATINGS --- A MANUFACTURER S PERSPECTIVE

In a Plastic World. Facilitator Instructions contributed by Meghan McNamara. Reflection. Skill:

Endocrine active substances in toys

The EFSA Journal (2005) 217, 1-5

The Exposure Matrix Project

The North American Metal Packaging Alliance

Current state of play on FCMs, including the risk assessment Eric Barthélémy, EFSA FCM team

RISK ASSESSMENT OF PRIMARY PACKAGING MATERIALS FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PLASTICS

1, 2, 3-Trichloropropane (TCP): Assessment of Risks from Drinking Water

Poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), also called perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)

Nicolucci C. (1), Rossi S. (2), Catapane M. (1), Introduction:

Chapter 2 Food Additive Intake Assessment An-Najah National university

DEVELOPMENT OF THE CHROMIUM PUBLIC HEALTH GOAL

Question. Question. Explanation: Explanation: Suggestion: Suggestion:

The terms used in these Directives are consistent with those defined by the Committee.

Regarding Establishment of a Uniform Limit in a Positive List System concerning Agricultural Chemicals Residues in Food etc.

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

Bisphenol A in Drinking Water

Impact of Melamine Pet Food Contamination on the Meat Industry

Glass Packaging Issues with PET. Key Features Inert and chemically inactive Pure and safe

C ONSUMPTION F OOD U SAGE F ACTORS AND PACKAGING. Summary of a Workshop held in July Organised by ILSI Europe Packaging Material Task Force

endocrine disruptors?

On-site visit August 2014 Department of Science Service Thailand

Date: 8 March Risk assessment of health hazards from epoxidised soybean oil (ESBO) migrated from lids used on glass containers of baby food

Bisphenol A (BPA) in Plastics and Possible Human Health Effects

Infant TDS. Results of the ANSES study on dietary exposure of children under 3 years of age to chemical substances

Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR)

Determination of Bisphenol A in Milk Powder using a Chromolith HighResolution RP-18 endcapped column

Modelling migration from plastics

Status of Activities on BPA

PACKAGING MIGRATION AND HARMFUL ELEMENT COMPLIANCES. By : Mr. Dilip Singh National Manager SGS India Pvt. Ltd.

Module 34: Legal aspects, ADI and GRAS status of food additives

European public MRL assessment report (EPMAR)

JOINT FOOD-CHAIN BRIEFING ON MAXIMUM RESIDUE LEVELS FOR PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS (PESTICIDES)

Provisional Translation Original: Japanese

DANIEL R. DOERGE U.S. Food and Drug Administration National Center for Toxicological Research Jefferson, AR

Rapid Analysis of Bisphenols A, B, and E in Baby Food and Infant Formula Using ACQUITY UPLC with the Xevo TQD

Surveillance and official control of food contact materials in Cyprus The case of Bisphenol A

Nutrition Labeling Standard Setting & Publicity

What are ENDROCRINE DISRUPTORS?

L 113/18 EN Official Journal of the European Union COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2017/752 of 28 April 2017 amending and correcting Regulation (

Ongoing activities in Risk-Benefit Assessment of Foods in Europe

Beverages in nutrition

Product Liability Update

Evaluation of an in-feed appetite suppressant as a. means to manipulate feed intake of pigs

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Ongoing review of legislation on cadmium in food in the EU: Background and current state of play

Can Coatings Primer and Safety Assessment: Communicating Evidence of Absence

Rethink Your Drink Core Presentation Teens / Adults ( years)

Migration and Exposure Considerations Jessica Cooper, PhD

Think Pink, Live Green: Protect Your Breast Health for Women and Girls. Keynote Speaker: Dr. Marisa Weiss, Founder and President, Breastcancer.

Archived Content. This content was archived on June 24, 2013.

Questions and Answers on Dioxins and PCBs

Sustainable Nutrition. Anne Roulin R&D Sustainability Manager Nestlé

POLICY BOARD POLICY OF THE WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES WELLNESS

Comprehensive analysis of the total migrate from can coatings: Solvents vs. simulants vs. foods

Impact of FCN772 for Future Food Packaging Applications with UV/EB Technology & The Real-Life Converting Practice

March 2016 THE PROPOSAL IS SUBMITTED BY: International Association of Color Manufacturers (IACM) & Natural Food Colour Association (NATCOL)

Frequently Asked Questions

The regulatory landscape. The now and the not yet

Juice Board Week 2 Activity Description What Would Your Doctor Recommend?

Approaches for the determination of NIAS as a part of Safety-By-Design

Application Note No. 119/2013 Determination of bisphenol A in preserved food SpeedExtractor E-916: Determination of bisphenol A in preserved food

Addressing Public Health and Environmental Risks

DAFNE EDUCATOR PROGRAMME PEER SUPPORT: LEARNING OUTCOMES

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) 2, 3

Opinion of the. Scientific Committee on Food. on Potential risks from organotin compounds used as catalysts in silicone-coated baking papers

Chemical food safety in the U.S. analysis of FDA s scientific basis for assessing chemical risk. Tom Neltner October 9, 2014

Comments from PlasticsEurope

The Great Food Conundrum: Health vs Sustainability

Maximum Residue Limits

Maria Teresa Scardigli Executive Director International Stevia Council. Stevia 2012 Conference 12 April 2012, London - UK

Nestlé global commitment to sodium reduction

Canada s Food Supply: A Preliminary Examination of Changes,

Chemical Transparency lessons learned

The Italian approach to the safety assessment of coatings intended for food contact application

Draft of Sanitation Standards for General Foods

Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food on an additional list of monomers and additives for food contact materials (adopted the 18 September 1998)

Part 2. Chemical and physical aspects

UV/EB-curing printing inks

Xenoestrogens. Ingrid Naiman Institute for Invisible Epidemics

Why we can be confident that low-calorie sweeteners are safe?

Contribution of Drinking Water to Dietary Requirements of Essential Metals

Screening Level Health Risk Assessment of PCCD/PCDF Contamination Da Nang Airbase Case Study

Food Valuation: Understanding the value of donated food. March 2018

Assessing Risks of Exposure to Allergens from Foods

All Member States were represented except Cyprus and Lithuania.

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX

Official Journal of the European Union REGULATIONS

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR A TIERED APPROACH TO RISK RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION

Assessing Risks for Inhalation and Ingestion of Pollutants

Outline: risk assessment. What kind of environmental risks do we commonly consider? 11/19/2013. Why do we need chemical risk assessment?

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) 2,3

Transcription:

SAFE AT DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS AND USE PATTERNS There are many different polycarbonate and epoxy products, with different use patterns and exposure situations. This is reflected in different migration patterns, which regulators consider in their safety assessment. The typical migration levels and exposure scenarios are correlated with different body weights. Comparing the results with the defined safe limits, expressed as Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI), the message remains the same: products made from materials based on BPA are safe for their intended uses. Polycarbonate utensils Typical migration level less than 0,001mg/kg (1ppb) Required consumption amount to reach the TDI: 600kg/day at 60 kg bw Canned food/beverage Polycarbonate beverage containers Typical migration level less than 0,005mg/kg (5ppb) Required consumption amount to reach the TDI: 120l/day at 60kg bw Typical migration level less than TDI 0,02mg/kg (20ppb) Required consumption amount to reach the TDI: 30kg/day at 60kg bw I-M PC Science 05 05.05

SAFE LIMIT OF EXPOSURE TO BPA INCLUDES LARGE SAFETY MARGIN Migration of BPA from polycarbonate utensils is extremely low, typically less than 1 ppb* (0,001 mg/kg). Throughout a whole lifetime it is impossible to consume sufficient amounts of food or beverage in contact with polycarbonate utensils to even reach the limit of BPA established as safe by European and international authorities. This safe limit (TDI**) has been defined at 0,01 mg/kg bodyweight/day over a lifetime. 60 kg: average adult bodyweight **Tolerable Daily Intake *based on PIRA study on migration of Bisphenol A from Polycarbonate Plastics Food Contact Materials and Articles, June 2003 600 kg of food For example: One would have to eat at least 10 times their own bodyweight of food in contact with polycarbonate utensils - every day during one s life - only to reach the safety limit. Clearly impossible. I-M PC Science 05.1 05.05

SAFE LIMIT OF EXPOSURE TO BPA INCLUDES LARGE SAFETY MARGIN Migration of BPA from polycarbonate beverage containers is extremely low, typically less than 5 ppb* (0,005 mg/kg). Throughout a whole lifetime it is impossible to consume sufficient amounts of PC-stored beverage to even reach the limit of BPA established as safe by European and international authorities. This safe limit (TDI**) has been defined at 0,01 mg/kg bodyweight/day over a lifetime. 60 kg: average adult bodyweight * Biles et al., Determination of bisphenol-a in reusable polycarbonate food-contact plastics and migration to food simulating liquids,1997, J. Agris. Food Chem. 45, 3541-3544 ** Tolerable Daily Intake 120 l of water For example: One would have to drink at least 120l of water from polycarbonate water bottles every day during one s life - only to reach the safety limit. Clearly impossible. I-M PC Science 05.2 05.05

SAFE LIMIT OF EXPOSURE TO BPA INCLUDES LARGE SAFETY MARGIN Migration of BPA from canned food/beverage is extremely low, typically less than 20 ppb* (0,02 mg/kg). Throughout a whole lifetime it is impossible to consume sufficient amounts of canned food or beverage to even reach the limit of BPA established as safe by European and international authorities. This safe limit (TDI**) has been defined at 0,01 mg/kg bodyweight/day over a lifetime. 60 kg: average adult bodyweight **Tolerable Daily Intake 30 kg of canned food: 60 cans per day For example: One would have to eat at least 30 kg of canned food every day during one s life - only to reach the safety limit. Clearly impossible. I-M ERC Science 05.3 05.05

CONSUMING EXTERNAL ESTROGENS IS PART OF THE NORMAL DIET 150 g of carrots contain at least the same amount of estrogen-like compounds as 30 kg of canned food*. Equal amount of estrogen-like compounds Throughout a lifetime it is normal to consume phytoestrogens with the regular diet at amounts that largely exceed the amount of estrogen-like compounds one could ever realistically consume via canned food or beverage. Migration of BPA from food or beverage packaging materials is extremely low, typically less than 20 ppb** (0,02 mg/kg). 0,15 kg of carrots contain 0,6 mg of phytoestrogen*** 30 kg of canned food contain 0,6 mg* of estrogen-like compounds (excluding any phytoestrogen from the food) * calculation based on typically measured BPA migration I-M ERC Science 05.4 05.05

PUTTING PPB INTO PERSPECTIVE: EXPOSURE TO BPA IS CLOSE TO ZERO Sophisticated scientific analytical methods are able to detect BPA at extremely low levels - down to low ppb (parts per billion): one part in a billion parts, i.e. 0.000 000 001 That is equivalent to 380 mm on the way to the moon, or one drop of water in an Olympic-size swimming pool, or 1 second in 32 years 380 mm I-M PC/ERC Science 06 05.04

CONSUMING EXTERNAL ESTROGENS IS PART OF THE NORMAL DIET It is impossible for consumers to be exposed to the BPA limit established as safe by European and international authorities. BPA ingestion from trace migration of packaging into food or beverages: 0,002 mg* in a meal of 200 g ingestion of estrogen-like compounds from natural ingredients: 0,8 mg** in a meal of 200 g 10 ppb 1 ppb = 0,001 mg/kg 4000 ppb In studies with laboratory animals which were exposed to extremely high levels of BPA (impossible to achieve outside a laboratory), very weak estrogen-like effects were seen. The potency of these effects is similar to the effects of naturally occurring estrogenlike substances in some vegetables and food stuffs like soy beans, carrots, garlic or coffee. this value does not constitute a health risk for children as shown in the assessment of the SCF* *reference via web-sourcing: SCF/CS/PM/3936 Final Carrots contain 400 times more estrogen-like compounds **IFST, October 2001, www.ifst.org/hottop34.htm, based on figure 1, Cassidy 1999 I-M PC/ERC Science 07.1 05.05

CONSUMING EXTERNAL ESTROGENS IS PART OF THE NORMAL DIET It is impossible for consumers to be exposed to the BPA limit established as safe by European and international authorities. BPA ingestion from trace migration of utensils into food or beverages: 0,0002 mg* in a meal of 200 g ingestion of estrogen-like compounds from natural ingredients: 0,8 mg*** in a meal of 200 g 1 ppb 1 ppb = 0,001 mg/kg 4000 ppb this value does not constitute a health risk as shown in the assessment of the SCF** *based on PIRA study on migration of Bisphenol A from Polycarbonate Plastics Food Contact Materials and Articles, June 2003 **reference via web-sourcing: SCF/CS/PM/3936 Final Carrots contain 400 times more estrogen-like compounds ***IFST, October 2001, www.ifst.org/hottop34.htm, based on figure 1, Cassidy 1999 I-M PC/ERC Science 07.2 05.05

CONSUMING EXTERNAL ESTROGENS IS PART OF THE NORMAL DIET It is impossible for consumers to be exposed to the BPA limit established as safe by European and international authorities. BPA ingestion from trace migration of can coating into the food or beverage: 0,004 mg* in a meal of 200 g 20 ppb ingestion of estrogen-like compounds from natural ingredients: 0,8 mg*** in a meal of 200 g 1 ppb = 0,001 mg/kg 4000 ppb this value does not constitute a health risk as shown in the assessment of the SCF** *based on PIRA study on migration of Bisphenol A from Can Coatings; Goodson, Summerfield, Cooper; Food Additives and Contaminants, 2002, Vol. No. 8, 794-802 **reference via web-sourcing: SCF/CS/PM/3936 Final ***IFST, October 2001, www.ifst.org/hottop34.htm, based on figure 1, Cassidy 1999 I-M PC/ERC Science 07.3 12.03

BPA MIGRATION RATES FROM CANS HAVE BEEN MINIMIZED Over the past 10-15 years, industry has continuously worked to reduce migration, incl. BPA: With advanced technology and innovative processing, BPA migration rates have been reduced by more than 90%. However, they always fully complied with the regulatory limits. Today, the measured levels are far below the safety limits, typically less than 20 ppb. 80 ppb 60 ppb 50 ppb 40 ppb 30 ppb 20 ppb 10 ppb 1990: official EU migration safety limit: 3000 ppb Typically measured: 80 times lower 2002: revised future EU migration safety limit: 600 ppb Typically measured: 30 times lower 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 I-M ERC Science 08 12.03