Why is Earlier and More Aggressive Treatment of T2 Diabetes Better?

Similar documents
ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

Diabete: terapia nei pazienti a rischio cardiovascolare

Glucose and CV disease

T2 Diabetes in Sep-16. Stephen Leow Disclosures. Why do we treat diabetes? Agenda. Targets

Glucose Control: Does it lower CV risk?

The Burden of the Diabetic Heart

A Fork in the Road: Navigating Through New Terrain

Navigating the New Options for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes

Obesity, Insulin Resistance, Metabolic Syndrome, and the Natural History of Type 2 Diabetes

ADVANCE post trial ObservatioNal Study

Initiating Insulin in Primary Care for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Dr Manish Khanolkar, Diabetologist, Auckland Diabetes Centre

Glucose Control and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

Prevention of complications: are we winning or losing the battle. Naveed Sattar Professor of Metabolic Medicine

Macrovascular Residual Risk. What risk remains after LDL-C management and intensive therapy?

Diabetes Mellitus: A Cardiovascular Disease

The Diabetes Link to Heart Disease

What s the Goal? Individualizing Glycemic Targets. Matthew Freeby M.D. December 3 rd, 2016

Cardiovascular Complications of Diabetes

Diabetes Mellitus: Implications of New Clinical Trials and New Medications

Update on Diabetes. Ketan Dhatariya. Why it s Not Just About Glucose Lowering Any More. Consultant in Diabetes NNUH

Preventive Cardiology Scientific evidence

American Academy of Insurance Medicine

Cardiovascular Management of a Patient with Diabetes

Diabetes new challenges, new agents, new order

Complications of Diabetes: Screening and Prevention

Treatment to reduce cardiovascular risk: multifactorial management

01/09/2017. Outline. SGLT 2 inhibitor? Diabetes Patients: Complex and Heterogeneous. Association between diabetes and cardiovascular events

Metformin should be considered in all patients with type 2 diabetes unless contra-indicated

Update on CVD and Microvascular Complications in T2D

Eugene Barrett M.D., Ph.D. University of Virginia 6/18/2007. Diagnosis and what is it Glucose Tolerance Categories FPG

Soo LIM, MD, PHD Internal Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Cedars Sinai Diabetes. Michael A. Weber

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

Complications of Diabetes: Screening and Prevention. Dr Martin McIntyre Consultant Physician Royal Alexandra Hospital Paisley

Diabetes Guidelines in View of Recent Clinical Trials Are They Still Applicable?

Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes

Hanyang University Guri Hospital Chang Beom Lee

Blood Pressure Treatment Goals

Diabetes: Staying Two Steps Ahead. The prevalence of diabetes is increasing. What causes Type 2 diabetes?

Microvascular Complications in Diabetes:

Evidence-Based Glucose Management in Type 2 Diabetes

Mr Rab Burtun. Dr David Kim. 8:30-10:30 WS #2: Diabetes Basic 11:00-13:00 WS #9: Diabetes Basic (Repeated)

Update on Diabetes Cardiovascular Outcome Trials

Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Evidence-Based Drivers

Can We Reduce Heart Failure by Treating Diabetes? CVOT Data on SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1Receptor Agonists

04-Sep-17. INERTIA a failure to initiate or modify treatment in a timely manner in people whose health is likely to improve with this modification

The target blood pressure in patients with diabetes is <130 mm Hg

Complications of Diabetes mellitus. Dr Bill Young 16 March 2015

Alia Gilani Health Inequalities Pharmacist

LATE BREAKING STUDIES IN DM AND CAD. Will this change the guidelines?

Position statement of the Australian Diabetes Society: individualisation of glycated haemoglobin targets for adults with diabetes mellitus

Sanofi Announces Results of ORIGIN, the World s Longest and Largest Randomised Clinical Trial in Insulin in Pre- and Early Diabetes

Ischemic Heart and Cerebrovascular Disease. Harold E. Lebovitz, MD, FACE Kathmandu November 2010

ACCORD, ADVANCE & VADT. Now what do I do in my practice?

How to Reduce CVD Complications in Diabetes?

Glycemic control a matter of life and death

Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk Management Denise M. Kolanczyk, PharmD, BCPS-AQ Cardiology

Dr Tahseen A. Chowdhury Royal London Hospital. New Guidelines in Diabetes: NICE or Nasty?

CV Risk Management in Diabetes Mellitus

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. A Fork in the Road: Navigating Through New Terrain. Diabetes Standards of Care Then and Now

Optimizing risk assessment of total cardiovascular risk What are the tools? Lars Rydén Professor Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden

Diabetes Day for Primary Care Clinicians Advances in Diabetes Care

The Flozins Quest for Clarity?

Management of Type 2 Diabetes Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials Tom Blevins MD Texas Diabetes and Endocrinology Austin, Texas

Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents

Update on Cardiovascular Outcome Trials in Diabetes. Rury R. Holman, FMedSci NIHR Senior Investigator 11 th February 2013

Oral Hypoglycemics and Risk of Adverse Cardiac Events: A Summary of the Controversy

Comprehensive Diabetes Treatment

A factorial randomized trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

Welcome and Introduction

Disclosures. Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk Management. Learning Objectives. Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Diabetes and the Heart

CONTROLLO GLICEMICO E RISCHIO CARDIOVASCOLARE. AGOSTINO CONSOLI DMSI - Università d Annunzio CHIETI ITALY. sul Paziente ad alto rischio CV*

Why Do We Care About Prediabetes?

Gli endpoint micro-vascolari nei trial di outcome cardiovascolare

Educational and behavioral interventions hitherto published

Epidemiology of Diabetes, Impaired Glucose Homeostasis and Cardiovascular Risk. Eberhard Standl

Microvascular Disease in Type 1 Diabetes

Current Updates & Challenges In Managing Diabetes in CVD

Medical therapy advances London/Manchester RCP February/June 2016

Cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: the impact of preventative therapies

Du gusts is megl che one. Edoardo Mannucci

Current Diabetes Care for Internists:2011

The Metabolic Syndrome: Is It A Valid Concept? YES

La lezione dei trials di safety cardiovascolare. Edoardo Mannucci

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

CANVAS Program Independent commentary

An Update on Guidelines and Evidence of the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

SCIENTIFIC STUDY REPORT

Barriers to Achieving A1C Targets: Clinical Inertia and Hypoglycemia. KM Pantalone Endocrinology

Diabetes. Health Care Disparities: Medical Evidence. A Constellation of Complications. Every 24 hours.

Practical Diabetes. Nic Crook. (and don t use so many charts) Kuirau Specialists 1239 Ranolf Street Rotorua. Rotorua Hospital Private Bag 3023 Rotorua

Diabetic Nephropathy. Objectives:

Systematically Assessing the Promise of Type 2 Diabetes Remission

10/27/2011. Challenges in Anti-diabetic Global Drug Development A Shift from Surrogate to Outcome Trials. Disclaimer

Quick Reference Guide

Diabetes is a metabolic disorder primarily

Intensification after basal insulin in type 2 diabetes

Long-Term Care Updates

Diabetes Mellitus Aeromedical Considerations. Aviation Medicine Seminar Bucharest, Romania. 11 th to 15 th November 2013

Transcription:

Blood glucose (mmol/l) Why is Earlier and More Aggressive Treatment of T2 Diabetes Better? Disclosures Dr Kennedy has provided CME, been on advisory boards or received travel or conference support from: Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Takeda, Boehringer-Ingelheim and Merck. Clinical Associate Professor Mark Kennedy Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne Chair, Primary Care Diabetes Society of Australia Medical Director, Northern Bay Health Overview Diabetes natural history and complications Glycaemic control early in T2DM is critical to reduce risk for diabetes-related outcomes Also targeting risk factors such as hypertension and dyslipidaemia brings additional benefits Primary care is the ideal place manage early, uncomplicated diabetes and thus have significant impact on the long term trajectory of the disease T2DM is associated with serious complications 2- to 4-fold increase in cardiovascular mortality Retinopathy and stroke Leading cause of blindness in adults Cardiovascular Disease 8/ individuals with diabetes die from CV events Nephropathy Neuropathy Leading cause of end-stage renal disease Leading cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputations 19.4 16.7 13.9 11.1 8.3.6 2.8 Natural history of T2DM Progressive deterioration of β-cell consists of both presumed irreversible component (loss of β-cell mass) and reversible glucotoxicity effect caused by hyperglycaemia on β-cell secretory capacity Glycaemia and Vascular Risk Relationship between glucose levels and vascular risk factors well established Hyperglycaemia may negatively impact myocardium before the diagnosis of T2DM 1 retinopathy can develop as early as 7 years before diagnosis of T2DM 2 Microalbuminuria in up to 7% of patients at diagnosis of T2DM 3 Adapted from: 1. Kendall DM et al. Am J Med 9;122(6 Suppl):S37. 1. Selvin et al., Circulation, 1(16), 1374 1382. (14); 2. Fong et al., Diabetes Care, 27(), 2 23. (4); 3. Adler et al., Kidney International, 63(1), 22 232. (3) 1

Prevalence (%) Prevalence (%) Primary composite endpoint* (%) Effect of HbA 1c on complications in the UKPDS 6 Myocardial infarction Microvascular disease.% 6.% 7.% 8.% 9.%.% retinopathy even in early stages of T2DM Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Diabetes Prevention Program cohort 7.9 IFG + IGT *Mean duration 3.1 years 12.6 Recent onset type 2 DM* More than 12% of people with recent-onset T2DM may already have diabetic retinopathy Adapted from: Stratton IM et al. BMJ ;32: 12. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Diabet Med7;24:137 44. Early Intensive Insulin Use Intensive Insulin therapy for 2-3 weeks after diagnosis Improves β-cell function and insulin resistance Can induce drug-free remission drug-free remission in 46% at 12 months Remission rates higher when insulin used compared to oral agents suggesting perhaps additional benefits of early Insulin, antilipolytic, anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptic effects Kramer et al. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, Volume 1, Issue 1, 13, Pp 28-34 STENO-2: multifactorial management significantly reduces risk of CV events in T2DM 1 8 7 6 N = 16 Primary composite endpoint: conventional therapy (44%) and intensive therapy (24%) P =.7 Conventional therapy Intensive therapy 1 6 8 2 3 4 7 9 Time of follow-up (years) 3% risk reduction (Intensive vs. Conventional Therapy) P =.1 *Death from CV causes, non-fatal MI, CABG, PCI, non-fatal stroke, amputation, or surgery for peripheral atherosclerotic artery disease. CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention. Adapted from: 1. Gaede P et al. N Engl J Med 3;348:383 93. 2. Gaede P, et al. N Engl J Med 8;38:8 91. Intensive therapy involved behaviour modification and pharmacological therapy targeting hyperglycaemia, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and microalbuminuria, with secondary prevention of CV disease with aspirin 1 Sustained benefit for CV events also observed in the intensive management group over an additional. years 2 STENO-2: Multifactorial management reduces the risk of microvascular complications in T2DM Relative risk of development or progression of microvascular complications with intensive management (n=8) vs conventional therapy (n=8) Variable Relative Risk p value Nephropathy.39 (.17-.87).3 Retinopathy.42 (.21-.86).2 Autonomic neuropathy Peripheral neuropathy.37 (.18-.79).2 1.9 (.4-2.22).66 Intensive multifactorial management over a mean follow-up of 7.8 years was associated with significant reductions in risk of development or progression of nephropathy, retinopathy and autonomic neuropathy vs conventional therapy Gaede P, et al. N Engl J Med. 3;348:383-93... Intensive therapy better 1. 1. 2. 2. Conventional therapy better Steno-2 21 year follow up After original 7.8 years of intensified, multifactorial, target-driven treatment of type 2 diabetes with microalbuminuria At 21.2 years of follow-up: CVD events more than double in conventional treatment group Extra 7.9 years of life in intensive treatment group Matched by time free from incident CVD Reduced Microvascular complications: Autonomic neuropathy, Nephropathy Retinopathy and blindness 2

HbA 1c (%) Percentage decrease in relative risk Australian Diabetes Society HbA 1c targets Individualized Glycemic Targets: Why? Populations HbA 1c % SI units General 7% 3 mmol/l Diabetes of short duration and no clinical CVD Requiring lifestyle modification ± metformin 6.% 42 mmol/l Requiring any antidiabetic agents other than metformin or insulin 6.% 48 mmol/l Requiring insulin 7.% 3 mmol/l Pregnancy or planning pregnancy 6% 42 mmol/l Diabetes of longer duration or clinical CVD (any therapy) 7.% 3 mmol/l Recurrent severe hypoglycaemia or hypoglycaemia unawareness (any therapy) Major comorbidities likely to limit life expectancy (any therapy) 8.% 64 mmol/l Symptomatic therapy of hypoglycaemia UKPDS post-trial follow-up: differences in HbA 1c not maintained after RCT ceased Intervention trial Post-trial monitoring Pts followed for years Conventional Sulphonylurea-insulin 9 8 7 6 Legacy Effect of Earlier Glucose Control After median 8. years post-trial follow-up Aggregate Endpoint 1997 7 Any diabetes related endpoint RRR: 12% 9% P:.29. Microvascular disease RRR: 2% 24% P:.99.1 Myocardial infarction RRR: 16% % P:.2.14 All-cause mortality RRR: 6% 13% P:.44.7 3 6 9 12 Time from randomisation (years) Post-trial monitoring annual follow-up 1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998;32:837-. 2. Holman RR, et al. N Engl J Med 8;39:77-89. Holman R, et al. N Engl J Med 8;39. UKPDS hypertension sub-study: tight BP control reduces complications in T2DM Diabetes-related deaths 32% risk reduction P <.2 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 Microvascular disease 37% risk reduction P <.1 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 44% risk reduction P =.13 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 Less tight control: mean BP 4/87 mmhg Tight control with captopril or atenolol: mean BP 144/82 mmhg Targets for T2D A 1% reduction in HbA 1c and a sustained diastolic BP <8 mmhg Adapted from: UKPDS Group. BMJ 1998;317:73 13. Adapted from Stratton IM, et al. UKPDS 3. BMJ ; 321: 412. corresponding to a 1% decrease in HbA 1C 21% Observational analysis of HbA 1c decrease from UKPDS study data 21% All cause mortality 14% Myocardial infarction 14% Lower extremity amputation or fatal peripheral vascular disease *P =.3; P <.1 12% * Peripheral vascular disease 43% Any diabetesrelated endpoint Diabetesrelated death Microvascular disease 37% Cataract extraction 19% 3

In the ACCORD trial, intensive therapy resulted in more deaths at 3. years but patients in UKPDS and ACCORD had different baseline characteristics UKPDS ACCORD Age 3.3 62 Median HbA1c 7.8 8.1 Median duration of diabetes Newly diagnosed years Previous cardiovascular event (exclusion criteria) 3.2% ACCORD patients had: a longer history of T2DM and a higher rate of previous cardiovascular events compared to UKPDS patients ACCORD N Engl J Med 8;38:24-9 UKPDS Group. Lancet1998;32:837 83. ACCORD N Engl J Med 8;38:24-9 ORIGIN Trial Patients with prior CVD or at high CV risk and either prediabetes or diabetes Insulin glargine vs standard therapy for 6.2 years Results: Reduced incident diabetes in those starting with prediabetes No decrease in composite outcome of CV death, non-fatal MI and non-fatal CVA Intensive glucose control on microvascular outcomes in T2DM Four trials (ACCORD, ADVANCE, UKPDS, and VADT). 27 49 participants. Median yr follow-up 9% mean HbA1c % less kidney events 13% less eye events No reduction for nerve events NNT 63 73T2DM patients to prevent one kidney or eye event 9% reduction in major cardiovascular events No reduction in all-cause mortality Increase in severe hypoglycaemia Sophia Zoungas, et al. Effects of intensive glucose control on microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a metaanalysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 17; : 431 37 ADVANCE, VADT and ACCORD Long-term benefits of intensive glycaemic control on microvascular outcomes in ADVANCE and VADT But no significant reduction in the risk of macrovascular outcomes with intensive control in first 3..6 years of follow-up. Improvements in CV outcomes apparent after an additional ~ years in ACCORD and ~ years in VADT, similar to UKPDS, but not after 6 years of follow-up in ADVANCE ACCORD BP and lipid normalization also did not results in event reduction LOOK AHEAD no benefit of lifestyle change and weight loss Above interventions started too late so intervention should be early HbA 1c reduction and cardiovascular events in T2D Danish database 2472 adults with new T2DM. Median age 62. years Large decrease HbA 1c within 6 months of metformin initiation followed for 2.6 years Lower risk of cardiovascular events and CVD death in T2DM Less comorbidities Less need for preventive medications Svensson et al, Diabetes Care Jun 17, (6) 8-87 4

Delay in treatment intensification increases risks of cardiovascular events in T2DM Retrospective cohort study in UK of,477 T2DM patients diagnosed from 199 with follow-up data available until 12 Median follow-up.3 years In those newly diagnosed: 22% remained under poor glycaemic control over 2 years 26% never received treatment intensification Delay in treatment intensification by 1 year for those with poor glycaemic control: Increased the risk of MI, HF, stroke by >% Paul, et al., Cardiovasc Diabetol 14:. () Take-home messages Microvascular complications of diabetes may already be present at time of diabetes diagnosis Glycaemic control early in T2DM is critical to reduce risk for diabetesrelated outcomes Simultaneously targeting risk factors such as hypertension and dyslipidaemia brings additional benefits Having practice systems in place to detect diabetes early and regularly review control of CVD risk factors especially when newly diagnosed can bring benefits over decades Primary care is the ideal place manage early, uncomplicated diabetes and thus have significant impact on the long term trajectory of the disease