Similar documents
CCES. Couple's Premium Report.


Relationship Questionnaire

I know you believe you understand what you think I said; but, I am not sure you realize what you heard is not what I meant.

SIGNS of HEALTHY & UNHEALTHY BOUNDARIES in RELATIONSHIPS. Trusting no-one - trusting anyone - black & white thinking

Learn how to more effectively communicate with others. This will be a fun and informative workshop! Sponsored by

Cambridge Public Schools SEL Benchmarks K-12

Peer Support Meeting COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES

What is effective communication?

IMPROVING INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS. Facilitator: Ms. Vu Viet Hang (M.Ed)

Overview. Agenda Topics

Caring For A Loved One With Dementia. Communicating with your Loved One

Real Love Vs Fantasy How to Keep Romantic Love Alive. with Dr. Lisa Firestone

Emotional Intelligence of dealing with People and Situations. Instructor Bill Friel City of Ormond Beach

SATISFACTION, DISTORTION, AND RELATIONSHIP DYNAMICS

USING ASSERTIVENESS TO COMMUNICATE ABOUT SEX

P.I.E.C.E.S. Dementia Care Series Approach September, 2011

COACHING I 7. CORE COMPETENCIES

PROBLEM SOLVING DIALOGUE

Professional Coach Training Session Evaluation #1

Communication Tools. Paul Deslauriers

Evolve Your Relationships Transform Your World

THE ART & SCIENCE OF COUPLES THERAPY

Effective communication can have a significant effect on client satisfaction.

Introduction to Crisis Intervention and the Role of Communication

UNDERSTANDING YOUR COUPLE CHECKUP RESULTS

Elements of Communication

Conflict Management & Emotional Intelligence:

Assertive Communication

6th grade ICR GHOST pre-activity

Connecting to the Guest. Dr. John L. Avella Ed.D Cal State Monterey Bay

REASON FOR REFLECTING

Conversations Without Words: Using Nonverbal Communication to Improve the Patient-Caregiver Relationship

WHAT IS SOFT SKILLS:

Communicating with hearing aid users. Advice on contributing to successful communication

GOT ANGER? PRACTICAL ANGER MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR DAILY LIVING

Lidia Smirnov Counselling

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Communication Tips for Serving Individuals With Dementia. Begin

Elementary Standards Illinois Standards for Social-Emotional Learning: Grades 1-5

Giving and Receiving Feedback for Performance Improvement

Open Table Nashville s Guide to De-Escalation

When Your Partner s Actions Seem Selfish, Inconsiderate, Immature, Inappropriate, or Bad in Some Other Way

Motivational Interviewing in Healthcare. Presented by: Christy Dauner, OTR

Communication (Journal)

Loving-Kindness Meditation

Communicating with Patients/Clients Who Know More Than They Can Say

10/17/2017. Causes of Dementia Alzheimer's Disease Vascular Dementia Diffuse Lewy Body Disease Alcoholic Dementia Fronto-Temporal Dementia Others

Listening Skills. The Social Work Skills Workbook 6th edition By Barry R. Cournoyer copyright 2011,2008 Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

INTERPERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS

Value of emotional intelligence in veterinary practice teams

1. Fun. 2. Commitment

Workshop 1 will help you to identify the impact of non verbal communication and developing positive body language habits

The Leader as a Communicator

Conflict Resolution Skills

Evaluating you relationships

Psychological needs. Motivation & Emotion. Psychological needs & implicit motives. Reading: Reeve (2015) Ch 6

behaviors How to respond when dementia causes unpredictable behaviors

ASDAH December MEANT FOR EACH OTHER: MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING AND THE HEALTH AT EVERY SIZE PRINCIPLES

Positive couple agreement happens when both you and your partner answer in a healthy direction.

Safeguarding adults: mediation and family group conferences: Information for people who use services

Seniors Helping Seniors September 7 & 12, 2016 Amy Abrams, MSW/MPH Education & Outreach Manager Alzheimer s San Diego

Ten Tips For Communicating With A Person Suffering From Chronic Pain

Sample Report. Sample Report Report. Fa c i l i tat or s (05/13) 180

Validation Techniques in a Real World By Alisa Tagg, BA ACC/EDU AC-BC CADDCT CDP CDCS NAAP President

Nonverbal Communication. CHS 446 Communication Skills for the Healthcare Professional Mohammed S. Alnaif, Ph.D.

By the end of this educational encounter the nurse will be able to:

Counseling Skills (I) Attending and Listening. Mr. Lema, Isaac Clinical Psychologist (MSc) 18 th December 2015

How to Interact with Adults with Communication Difficulties

Exploring YOUR inner-self through Vocal Profiling

- Conduct effective follow up visits when missing children return home ensuring intelligence is shared with appropriate partners.

The Satisfaction in the doctor-patient relationship: the communication assessment

Assertive Communication/Conflict Resolution In Dealing With Different People. Stephanie Bellin Employer Services Trainer

WHEN WE RE NOT GETTING ALONG FEELINGS, THOUGHTS AND BEHAVIORS

C. Identify gender differences in communication. 9. Men and women communicate in different ways, primarily because of socialization and status.

Samantha Wright. September 03, 2003

10/9/2015 EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE

CHAPTER THIRTEEN Managing Communication

SPORT PSYCHOLOGY. Effective Communication and Dealing with Athletes with Low Self-Esteem

50 WAYS TO EFFECTIVELY DEAL WITH CONFLICT. By Carol Dysart & Sandra Davis

If you have a boring relationship, it means you re not being intimate enough.

SEXUALITY Information for Patients and Families

CAP Lung Cancer Medical Writers Circle

Soul of leadership workshop. Patricia E. Molina, MD, PhD What I learned

Client Care Counseling Critique Assignment Osteoporosis

54 Emotional Intelligence Competencies

4/9/2012. Work/ School/ Love/ Kids. What do we do when something is missing? It s empty? Building a Calling.

Emotional Intelligence

Module 2 Mentalizing

Interviewing Victims: Key Issues and Challenges

THE TRUST EDGE. TRUST is. THE TRUST EDGE is the gained when others confidently believe in you.

IT S A WONDER WE UNDERSTAND EACH OTHER AT ALL!

Changes to your behaviour

GROUP REPORT. Insert Personalized Title SAMPLE. Assessments Completed Between: December 18, 2013 and December 20, 2013

Personal Listening Profile Facilitator Report

mike jay August 23, 2006 (Online)

Building Resilience through Authentic Relationships Maggie Hartzler, LISW CTP School Based Therapist

Comparison Report For Kathryn Petersen Working with Martin Gilmore

U3C1L2 Appreciating Diversity through Winning Colors. What You Will Learn to Do. Linked Core Abilities

5 Quick Tips for Improving Your Emotional Intelligence. and Increasing Your Success in All Areas of Your Life

Transcription:

www.psychwest.com/ccestest.html Powered by PSYCHWEST, Clinical & Forensic Psychology Couple's Couple s Communicative Evaluation Scale Craig West, Psy.D. Copyright 2009, PSYCHWEST, Clinical & Forensic Psychology, All Rights Reserved (No copy via print or in electronic form is allowed without written permission.)

Couple's Communicative Evaluation Scale (CCES) A Couple's Relationship Checkup and Couple's Communication Enrichment Program (CCEP)! by PSYCHWEST, Clinical & Forensic Psychology Congratulations on completing the Couple's Communicative Evaluation Scale (CCES), a Couple's Relationship Checkup and Couple's Communication Enrichment Program (CCEP). The core foundation of the Couple's Communicative Evaluation Scale is based on the assumption that communication weaknesses and distress within a relationship go hand in hand. That is, as positive communication interactions between partners become more negative, couples will experience more distress within their relationship. The Couple's Communicative Evaluation Scale is designed to measure both communicative impairment and varying satisfaction among couples. It is a validated and researched test which identifies individual communication patterns between partners. The CCES should be viewed as a diagnostic tool for monitoring your relationship. You take your car in for an oil change every 3 months to ensure that it is in working order. Why not do the same for yourself? Make sure your relationship is well adjusted, and maintained. Give your relationship the attention it needs to flourish. Your CCES results are not permanent or unchangeable. These results indicate where your relationship is today. Understanding your communication patterns and making the effort to build on your strengths and make changes where needed will alter the scores and your satisfaction with each other. If you have concerns regarding your relationship or would like to explore ways to increase your intimacy, the Couple's Communication Program (CCEP) may be the next step you're looking for. Taking the time to reflect on and enhance your relationship is an important part of growing as a couple. The Couple's Communication Enrichment Program (CCEP) is designed to assist you and your partner in identifying your communication strengths and weaknesses. It is also intended to identify strategies that will enhance your communication with one another; therefore, increasing your sense of intimacy and feelings of being appreciated. The CCEP program guides couples in nurturing one another and their relationship. It also asserts that if you and your partner communicate in loving ways and learn how to handle issues in a way that fosters the other, your relationship will flourish. The resulting profile scores from the CCES can be used by professionals working with couples in all stages of their relationship. Professionals who have comprehensive knowledge of the CCES and the CCEP are known as CCES Analysts and Intimate Communication Specialists (ICS). Intimate Communication Specialists use the initial results from the CCES to provide an actual starting point for couples therapy. They use your results to personally develop a Couple's Communication Enrichment Program unique to your particular needs. The process encourages honesty and active engagement g in the program's process. The CCES may be taken at different stages of the program to determine what progress has been made and what aspects of communication needs to be addressed further. The CCES results and the CCEP continue to provide ways to new, positive, loving and successful communication exchanges. Therefore, as your communication with each other improves throughout the steps of the program, you will see your satisfaction with one another increase. If you have concerns regarding your CCES scores or would like to explore ways to increase your intimacy, you may contact an Intimate Communication Specialist/CCES Analyst who can give you professional feedback and assistance. To find an Intimate Communication Specialist/CCES Analyst in your area visit www.psychwest.com. We hope the results found here will assist you in your endeavor to create a loving, harmonious relationship. We wish you much success! Thank You, Craig West, Psy.D. Clinical/Forensic Psychologist Director of the CCES and CCEP Intimate Communication Specialist and CCES Analyst For Professionals Would you like to learn how to become an Intimate Communication Specialist and CCES Analyst? Click Here For Couples Are you looking for an Intimate Communication Specialist/CCES Analyst who can assist you in the exploration of your relationship? Are you looking for romantic and fun ideas that will boost intimacy? Click Here Click Here

Couple's Communicative Evaluation Scale (CCES) Summary Page (Level) Level 1 = MINIMAL DIFFICULTIES VERY SATISFIED 1A and 1B = Self perception of own communication 2 = MILD DIFFICULTIES SATISFIED 2A and 2B = Self perception of partner's communication 3 = MODERATE DIFFICULTIES DISSATISFIED 3A and 3B = Self perception of couple's communication 4 = SEVERE DIFFICULTIES VERY DISSATISFIED 4A and 4B = Couple's perception of self's (Partner 1 or 2) communication 5 = PROFOUND DIFFICULTIES EXTREMELY DISSATISFIED 5A/B= Overall Couple's Communication Name: 1: Aimee Spiore Name: 2: Mike Spiore Partner #1 ID# 1058 Partner #2 ID# 1058B 1: Aimee Spiore 2: Mike Spiore 2: Mike Spiore 1: Aimee Spiore Couple's Communication T Score 1A 2A 3A 4A 1B 2B 3B 4B 5A/B Form 5A/B MECHANICAL - VERBAL SUBSCALE 3 4 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 EMOTIONAL- VERBAL SUBSCALE 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 VERBAL SCALE SCORE 3 4 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 68 MECHANICAL - NONVERBAL SUBSCALE 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 EMOTIONAL - NONVERBAL SUBSCALE 3 4 4 4 2 4 3 3 3 NONVERBAL SCALE SCORE 3 4 3 3 2 4 3 3 3 73 MECHANICAL - ATTENDING SUBSCALE 3 4 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 EMOTIONAL - ATTENDING SUBSCALE 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 3 3 LEVEL 1 / ATTENDING 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 3 3 MECHANICAL - INTERPRETATION SUBSCALE 3 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 EMOTIONAL - INTERPRETATION SUBSCALE 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 LEVEL 2 / INTERPRETATION 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 LISTENING SCALE SCORE 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 66 OVERALL COMMUNICATION SCORE 3 4 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 69 CRITICAL SCALE SCORE 3 4 3 3 2 4 3 3 3 74 Validity Profile Missed DEVIANT SUBSCALE FOR PARTNER #1 VALID INTERPRET Aimee Spiore 0 DEVIANT SUBSCALE FOR PARTNER #2 VALID INTERPRET INTERPRET DEVIANT SCALE SCORE VALID INTERPRET CONSISTENCY SUBSCALE FOR PARTNER #1 VALID INTERPRET CONSISTENCY SUBSCALE FOR PARTNER #2 VALID INTERPRET Mike Spiore 0 CONSISTENCY SCALE SCORE VALID INTERPRET INTERPRET COMBINED SUBSCALE FOR PARTNER #1 VALID INTERPRET COMBINED SUBSCALE FOR PARTNER #2 VALID INTERPRET COMBINED SCALE SCORE VALID INTERPRET Agreement Level Overall Couple 1: Aimee Spiore 2: Mike Spiore Couple's Verbal Agreement Level GOOD AGREEMENT GOOD AGREEMENT POOR AGREEMENT Couple's Nonverbal Agreement Level GOOD AGREEMENT FAIR AGREEMENT POOR AGREEMENT Couple's Listening Agreement Level GOOD AGREEMENT FAIR AGREEMENT FAIR AGREEMENT Couple's Overall Agreement Level GOOD AGREEMENT GOOD AGREEMENT POOR AGREEMENT

Couple's Communicative Evaluation Scale (CCES) (Percentage Score) Level 1 = MINIMAL DIFFICULTIES VERY SATISFIED 1A and 1B = Self perception of own communication 2 = MILD DIFFICULTIES SATISFIED 2A and 2B = Self perception of partner's communication 3 = MODERATE DIFFICULTIES DISSATISFIED 3A and 3B = Self perception of couple's communication 4 = SEVERE DIFFICULTIES VERY DISSATISFIED 4A and 4B = Couple's perception of self's (Partner 1 or 2) communication 5 = PROFOUND DIFFICULTIES EXTREMELY DISSATISFIED 5A/B= Overall Couple's Communication Name: 1: Aimee Spiore Name: 2: Mike Spiore Partner #1 ID# 1058 Partner #2 ID# 1058B 1: Aimee Spiore 2: Mike Spiore 2: Mike Spiore 1: Aimee Spiore Couple's Communication 1A 2A 3A 4A 1B 2B 3B 4B 5A/B MECHANICAL - VERBAL SUBSCALE 58% 78% 68% 60% 42% 62% 52% 60% 60% EMOTIONAL- VERBAL SUBSCALE 54% 83% 68% 60% 52% 67% 60% 68% 64% VERBAL SCALE SCORE 56% 81% 68% 60% 47% 64% 56% 64% 62% MECHANICAL - NONVERBAL SUBSCALE 62% 70% 66% 65% 50% 68% 59% 60% 62% EMOTIONAL - NONVERBAL SUBSCALE 68% 74% 71% 73% 44% 78% 61% 59% 66% NONVERBAL SCALE SCORE 65% 72% 69% 69% 47% 73% 60% 59% 64% MECHANICAL - ATTENDING SUBSCALE 56% 76% 66% 62% 44% 68% 56% 60% 61% EMOTIONAL - ATTENDING SUBSCALE 64% 86% 75% 66% 50% 69% 60% 68% 67% LEVEL 1 / ATTENDING 60% 81% 70% 64% 47% 68% 58% 64% 64% MECHANICAL - INTERPRETATION SUBSCALE 60% 83% 71% 72% 54% 84% 69% 69% 70% EMOTIONAL - INTERPRETATION SUBSCALE 53% 76% 64% 60% 64% 67% 66% 70% 65% LEVEL 2 / INTERPRETATION 56% 79% 68% 66% 59% 76% 68% 69% 68% LISTENING SCALE SCORE 59% 80% 69% 65% 52% 71% 62% 66% 66% OVERALL COMMUNICATION SCORE 60% 78% 69% 65% 49% 70% 59% 64% 64% CRITICAL SCALE SCORE 36% 58% 47% 43% 28% 51% 40% 43% 43%

Form 5A/B Couple's Overall Score Form 5A/B Couple's Overall Score 100% Extremely Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 80% 62% 64% 66% 64% Dissatisfied Satisfied 60% 40% 43% Very Satisfied 20% Verbal Nonverbal Listening Overall Critical

Perception of Couple's Communication 100% Extremely Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 80% Dissatisfied 60% Satisfied Very Satisfied 40% 20% Verbal Nonverbal Listening Overall Critical Form 3A 1: Aimee Spiore (View of Couple) 68% 69% 69% 69% 47% Form 3B 2: Mike Spiore (View of Couple) 56% 60% 62% 59% 40% Couple's View of Self 100% Extremely Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 80% Dissatisfied 60% Satisfied Very Satisfied 40% 20% Verbal Nonverbal Listening Overall Critical Form 4A 1: Aimee Spiore 60% 69% 65% 65% 43% Form 4B 2: Mike Spiore 64% 59% 66% 64% 43%

(Partner #1) View of Self Vs. Partner's View Extremely Dissatisfied 100% Very Dissatisfied 80% Dissatisfied 60% Satisfied 40% Very Satisfied 20% Verbal Nonverbal Listening Overall Critical Form 1A 1: Aimee Spiore (View of Self) 56% 65% 59% 60% 36% Form 2B 2: Mike Spiore (View of Partner) 64% 73% 71% 70% 51% (Partner #2) View of Self Vs. Partner's View Extremely Dissatisfied 100% Very Dissatisfied 80% Dissatisfied 60% Satisfied Very Satisfied 40% 20% Verbal Nonverbal Listening Overall Critical Form 1B 2: Mike Spiore (View of Self) 47% 47% 52% 49% 28% Form 2A 1: Aimee Spiore (View of Partner) 81% 72% 80% 78% 58%

REPORT INTERPRETATION - Couple's Perception Regarding Overall Communication Aimee Spiore & Mike Spiore Overall Communication Scale Score This section of the CCES is the overall score based on the combined questions answered by both individuals. This score is used to analyze the couple's overall communication pattern. Overall, this couple views their communication as poor. They feel that, generally, they have some moderate difficulty communicating their thoughts and feelings to one another. They are acknowledging that they have some significant difficulties in the way they communicate. Although at times they may feel content and happy as a couple, more often than not they feel distress within the relationship. Some guidance could assist the couple in communicating better given their significant communication patterns overall. Their satisfaction with one another is poor and they likely exhibit fights that are not typically seen between satisfied couples. They are currently deemed to be at a moderate risk of separation or divorce and some guidance and support in assisting their interaction with one another would be helpful and recommended. Verbal Scale Score This section of the CCES is the overall verbal score based on the combined questions answered by both individuals. This score is used to analyze the couple's overall ability to communicate verbally. The Overall Verbal Scale Score indicates that this couple, more often than not, may say things that are hurtful and that they have trouble communicating or stating their needs effectively to one another. The things they say to each other likely creates distress between them. Mechanical-Verbal Subscale The Mechanical-Verbal Subscale Score indicates that this couple may have moderate difficulty communicating words in a positive way. Examining their sentence structure should reveal that they may articulate their needs inappropriately some of the time and their verbal communication style sometimes lends to a fairly negative interaction. They may be able to accurately state positive things about one another at times, although there appears to be moderate difficulties in this area. Their satisfaction level in this area is likely low. Emotional-Verbal Subscale The Emotional-Verbal Subscale Score indicates that this couple sometimes says things to one another that do not feel good and are communicated verbally with negative emotions. Their ability to say things to one another with sincere emotions appears to be impaired and contributes to a poor communication interaction. Their ability to communicate verbally with positive emotions does appear to be moderately impaired at this time. Nonverbal Scale Score This section of the CCES is the overall nonverbal score based on the combined questions answered by both individuals. This score is used to analyze the couple's overall ability to communicate nonverbally. The Overall Nonverbal Scale Score indicates that this couple does not use nonverbal gestures adequately and has difficulty creating feelings of safety with one another. They may demonstrate affection by the things they do at times, although it is likely to be inconsistent and/or harsh. They may do the small things (e.g., opening the car door, hugging) that contribute to good nonverbal communication, although it may also be limited at times or their actions are performed without feelings of genuineness. They are likely inconsistent in doing things that demonstrate their love to one another and they may be dissatisfied in this area. Some moderate support might assist in enhancing this couple's nonverbal interaction so that they are able to demonstrate their love and desire for one another in a more caring and gentle fashion.

Mechanical-Nonverbal Subscale The Mechanical-Nonverbal Subscale Score indicates that this couple most likely uses nonverbal gestures inadequately that may not always create feelings of safety with one another. They likely demonstrate difficulty displaying affection by the things they do (e.g., opening the car door, hugging) which contributes to poor nonverbal communication. Overall, they appear to have moderate difficulty in this area. Emotional-Nonverbal Subscale The Emotional-Nonverbal Subscale Score indicates that this couple may lack some positive feelings and may dislike doing things for or with one another at times. The moderate persistency and intensity warrants attention to assist the couple in doing things for one another without the negative emotional baggage associated with the nonverbal gestures. They likely demonstrate with moderate dissatisfaction. Listening Scale This section of the CCES is the overall listening score based on the combined questions answered by both individuals. This score is used to analyze the couple's overall ability to communicate by actively listening and correctly understanding each other's communication. The Overall Listening Scale Score indicates that this couple most likely demonstrates with moderately poor listening skills. They make attempts when communicating, although they sometimes fall short when trying to focus on each other. They likely do not attempt to ask for clarification to make sure there are no misunderstandings or their skill in doing so without feelings of frustration and anger is likely impaired. They may not completely respect each other's views and find it fairly difficult to listen to what the other partner is saying. They sometimes misunderstand each other's needs, especially during an argument. Some guidance and expertise in developing better listening skills is recommended. Level 1 / Attending Mechanical-Attending Subscale The Mechanical-Attending Scale Score indicates that this couple likely demonstrates with moderate difficulty taking in information given by their partner. They demonstrate with moderately poor attending skills when the their partner is trying to convey an important message and may have trouble listening without interrupting. They may have moderate difficulty paying attention to each other's nonverbal cues. This is an area that needs to be developed further. They may sometimes feel like they are not hearing one another and this lack of feeling heard and paid attention to likely creates discord amongst themselves. Emotional-Attending Subscale The Emotional-Attending Scale Score indicates that this couple is likely unable to take in information given by their partner with positive feelings as often as would be recommended. They may sometimes be able to listen with compassion, demonstrate good eye contact and appear soft, warm and sincere when listening to each other; however, listening with compassion at other times is likely to be a struggle for them. They are likely to demonstrate with a moderate impairment in displaying appropriate emotions when listening to their partner, especially when serious matters are being discussed. They likely feel some defensiveness and may have difficulty remaining calm when their partner is communicating to them. Level 2 / Interpretation Mechanical-Interpretation Subscale The Mechanical-Interpretation Scale Score indicates that this couple is having significant difficulty accurately and correctly interpreting the meaning behind their partner's words and actions. They feel like they sometimes misunderstand each other and may have lost touch with one another. They sometimes feel understood, but demonstrate a limited capacity in asking for clarification. They have difficulty maintaining a solid relationship built on understanding and trust and may lack an ability to validate what their partner is saying or doing so that misunderstandings are minimized. They likely have a very poor skill set when interpreting ti their partner's words and actions, thus decreasing each partner's trust t that t they are understood. d

Emotional-Interpretation Subscale The Emotional-Interpretation Scale Score indicates that this couple is likely having moderate difficulty accurately and correctly interpreting the feelings behind their partner's words and actions. They feel like they sometimes understand each other and are not in touch with how their partner feels and the reasons behind those feelings. They sometimes feel understood and they likely have limited skills in knowing how to ask for clarification about how their partner is feeling. They have a moderate impairment in maintaining a solid relationship built on understanding and may sometimes lack an ability to validate what the other is feeling so that misunderstandings are minimized. They likely have undeveloped skills when interpreting their partner's feelings, thus decreasing each partner's trust that they are understood. Critical Scale Score This section of the CCES is the overall critical score based on the combined questions answered by both individuals. This score is used to analyze the couple's overall ability to communicate without using the more extreme negative styles of communication which would place them at a substantially higher risk of damaging the relationship. The Overall Critical Scale Score indicates that this couple sometimes communicates in critically negative ways that places them at high risk for ongoing problems. Overall, they demonstrate moderate difficulty communicating respectfully and may find themselves communicating in demeaning or aggressive ways towards each other. They sometimes demonstrate an inability to work well within the relationship and communicate effectively. As a couple they are reporting problems communicating to one another in a respectful way and are likely unable to resolve many problems together without using critically negative communication. Some domestic violence patterns are likely to be present such as shoving or pushing or they are at risk for becoming aggressive with each other. They likely feel the strain in the way they communicate, and may have some feelings of giving up. Alcohol consumption and/or drug use may be increasing their negative interaction with each other and a further evaluation is recommended to determine if substance use is contributing to their poor communication style. You have reached the end of this report! Thank you so much for allowing us to serve you. If we can be of any further assistance please contact us by visiting www.psychwest.com.