SUMMARY RECORD OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH. (Section GM Food & Feed and Environmental Risk)

Similar documents
Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH SECTION ON GENERAL FOOD LAW. Summary Record of Meeting of 15 July 2009

STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH SECTION ON GENERAL FOOD LAW. Summary Record of Meeting of 30 April 2012

DECISIONS. (Only the Dutch and French texts are authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)

SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 10 DECEMBER 2012 (Section General Food Law)

STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH SECTION ON GENERAL FOOD LAW Summary Record of Meeting of 25 June 2007

SUMMARY RECORD OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD ON DECEMBER 2009 IN BRUSSELS (Section Animal Nutrition)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 23 APRIL 2014

All member States were represented, except Bulgaria and Czech Republic

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

(SECTION ON GENERAL FOOD LAW)

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 7 September 2009 (OR. en) 11261/09 Interinstitutional File: 2008/0002 (COD) DENLEG 51 CODEC 893

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2015

STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH. Section on General Food Law. Summary Record of 6th meeting July 18th 2003

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 09 JUNE 2015

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU).../... of XXX

Council of the European Union Brussels, 27 March 2017 (OR. en)

REPORT OF EFSA. European Food Safety Authority 2. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

Working Document prepared by the Commission services - does not prejudice the Commission's final decision 3/2/2014 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

Delegations will find attached document D051559/03.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 23 SEPTEMBER 2015

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX

European Union legislation on Food additives, Food enzymes, Extractions solvents and Food flavourings

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX. authorising certain health claims made on foods and referring to children's development and health

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER. Note

Laura Beatriz Herrero Montarelo, Maria Dolores Gómez Vázquez and Victorio José Teruel Muñoz

TECHNICAL REPORT OF EFSA

The legal basis of this draft Regulation is Art. 11 (4) of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2204.

13267/11 PM/tl 1 DG I

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 13 JUNE 2014

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of XXX

(Text with EEA relevance)

DIRECTIVE 2004/24/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 31 March 2004

13480/12 PM/ns 1 DG B 4B

SUMMARY RECORD OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 16 NOVEMBER (Section Animal Health and Welfare)

Feed Additive Approval An Industry View. Dr Heidi Burrows Regulatory manager

BASF Plant Science Amflora Facts. Content

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 07 MARCH 2017

Delegations will find attached document D042445/02.

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

TECHNICAL REPORT OF EFSA

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

HEALTH & CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 March 2015 (OR. en)

Feedback from the Member States questionnaire

WELCOME AND APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE...

SUMMARY RECORD OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD ON FEBRUARY 2012 IN BRUSSELS (Animal Nutrition Section)

Official Journal of the European Union

Practical guidance for applicants on the submission of applications on food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings

Official Journal of the European Union REGULATIONS

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

EU food policy: public health beyond the internal market

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX. establishing mitigation measures and benchmark levels for the reduction of the presence of acrylamide in food

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX. establishing mitigation measures and benchmark levels for the reduction of the presence of acrylamide in food

Delegations will find attached document D048379/05.

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament. Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee ( 3 ),

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 08 MARCH MARCH 2016

Regulation (EU) No 1169/ Future work on food information to consumers

(Text with EEA relevance)

HEALTH & CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH Section Animal Health and Welfare AGENDA

(Text with EEA relevance)

Good Laboratory Practice. EU-Serbia screening meeting Brussels, 19 June 2014

(Text with EEA relevance) (2014/798/EU)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Delegations will find attached document D056135/03.

REASONED OPINION. European Food Safety Authority 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

Update from the European Commission s Working Group meeting on health claims, 31 March 2015

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

Response to: Concept paper of 9 February 2011 submitted for public consultation by the European Commission on the

Food Legislation. Janet Worrell July 2014

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

(Text with EEA relevance)

on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning food additives authorized for use in foodstuffs intended for human consumption

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. PHARMACEUTICAL COMMITTEE 21 October 2015

(Text with EEA relevance)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 16 JUNE JUNE 2014

The Nutrition (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018

Official Journal of the European Union

WORKING DOCUMENT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION SERVICES

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION DECISION. of 18-XII-2007

HEALTH & CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

L 32/44 Official Journal of the European Union

Delegations will find attached document D055983/01.

PGEU GPUE. Pharmaceutical Group of European Union Groupement Pharmaceutique de l Union Européenne

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

DIRECTIVES. (Text with EEA relevance)

Council of the European Union Brussels, 14 February 2017 (OR. en)

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX. amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels of lead in certain foodstuffs

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

SANCO/10616/2009 rev. 7 ( )

Transcription:

SUMMARY RECORD OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 19 APRIL 2007 (Section GM Food & Feed and Environmental Risk) President for items 1-3: Dorothée André President for item 3A: Bernard Van Goethem All Member States were present. 1. Examination and possible opinion on a draft Commission Decision authorising the placing on the market of food and feed produced from genetically modified sugar beet H7-1 (KM-ØØØH71-4) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council. A draft Commission Decision authorising the placing on the market of food and feed produced from genetically modified sugar beet H7-1 (KM-ØØØH71-4) under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed was submitted to the Committee for an opinion. As for points 2 and 3 of the agenda, it was underlined that the procedure leading to the draft authorisation had been improved. In particular, the EFSA opinion includes a new annex explaining how each comment provided by the Member States was taken into account. The Committee did not deliver an opinion on the draft authorisation Decision since there was not a qualified majority. 16 Member States voted in favour of the draft Decision; 8 voted against and 2 abstained. The Chairman indicated that the Commission would be invited to submit a proposal to the Council in accordance with the Regulatory procedure. Written declaration from Greece Vote Against presented. More specific, the comments made by the Geek Competent Authorities during the consultation period were not answered adequately by EFSA, in particular the comments related to molecular characterization of this GM event. 1

Monitoring Plan According to the provisions of annex VII of directive 2001/18/EC, we believe that a monitoring plan that takes into consideration the accidental spillage is missing from the dossier. Also the secondary products are difficult to be monitored. regarding the use of food for human consumption should be added to the dossier. The secondary products are difficult to be monitored 2. Examination and possible opinion on a draft Commission Decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize 1507xNK603 (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6) under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council. 3. Examination and possible opinion on a draft Commission Decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize NK603xMON810 (MON-ØØ6Ø3-6xMON-ØØ81Ø-6) under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Two draft Commission decisions authorising the placing on the market of genetically modified maize with stacked events under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed were presented to the Committee. A Commission representative clarified that the scope of these two authorisations was covering the grains of genetically modified maize that may be used for food or feed production or for other uses designated in the draft Decision as "other products for the same uses as any other maize" (e.g. production of oil for biodiesel). These products are falling within the definition of "GMO for food use" or "GMO for feed use" of Regulation 1829/2003 on GM Food and Feed. Several delegations indicated that they were in a position to support these two draft authorisations but that they would welcome further technical discussions on the implementation of the control of the labelling threshold of 0.9% in case of stacked events. Other delegations indicated that, depending on these discussions, they could also support these decisions. It was also agreed that certain aspects of the environmental monitoring plans should be reviewed. The Committee agreed to proceed with these discussions in view to harmonise the implementation of the legislation and to review the environmental monitoring plans. Against this background, the votes were postponed to the next meeting of the Standing Committee. 2

Declaration of Greece 1507 x NK603 presented. Toxicology We insist that an additional 90-day feeding study in rats with whole GM plants of the hybrid in question should be carried out to further complete its safety assessment. The fact that studies for each of the parental line (1507, NK603) have been carried out and therefore additional subchronic toxicity studies with 1507xNK603-maize is not considered as necessary cannot be regarded as appropriate. Compositional analysis The compositional data of 1507xNK603 and the traditional control maize demonstrated statistically significant differences for many nutrients (fatty acids, vitamins and minerals) across locations. It is necessary to include a comparison table of proteins, fat, vitamins, minerals, etc. to show these differences and determine their significance. Moreover, we consider that additional samples for further analysis, harvested from different field experiments are necessary in order to ensure the equivalence of the GM food / feed with the traditional maize. Molecular Characterization A detailed description of the insertion site including sequence data of the inserted material and of the flanking regions, in order to avoid rearrangements has not been conducted for the hybrid in question. Field Trials Field trials should cover more than one representative growing season and multiple geographical locations representative of various climatic conditions to provide useful information on the protein levels of CRY1, PAT and CP4 EPSPS throughout the growth and development of the maize. The file on the 1507xNK603 maize includes data on field trials that were conducted only in three regions of Chile (Buin, Linderos and Viluco) for one growing season (2002-2003). However, field trials have already been performed in France (2003) and Spain (2003, 2004) according to the submitted application. We believe that these data should be provided. Moreover, data on field trials conducted in at least one more growing season should be provided as well. Greece is of the opinion that still the environmental risk assessment can not be regarded as sufficient. 3

regarding the use of food for human consumption should be added to the dossier. Products are difficult to be monitored. Quantification and Labelling Problems will arise with the labelling (the 0.9% threshold is not applicable) and the quantification of the hybrid in question. The lack of event specific method for the direct detection of the hybrid leads to over - estimation or sub - estimation of the percentage of the GM DNA. On the other hand the simultaneous detection of both events in a single seed is not considered to be a practical solution. Finally Greece is of the opinion that the paragraphs 2c και ANEX b3 must be clarified further otherwise be removed from the text because are not covered by the scope of the Reg 1829/2003 (art 1 and 15). NK603 x MON810 presented. More specific: Toxicology We insist that an additional 90-day feeding study in rats with whole GM plants of the hybrid in question should be carried out to further complete its safety assessment. The fact that studies for each of the parental lines (MON810, NK603) have been carried out and therefore additional subchronic toxicity studies with NK603 x MON810-maize is not considered as necessary cannot be regarded as appropriate (taking also into consideration the results of the subchronic toxicological studies in rats of the ΜΟΝ863xMON810xNK603 hybrid). Molecular Characterization According to the Technical Dossier, only southern blot experiments have been performed to conclude that the structure and organization of the inserts found in NK603xMON810 maize are equivalent to those present in NK603 and MON810 maize respectively. However, we would like to know which experimental data prove that the flanking sequences of the two inserts in the hybrid NK603xMON810 are the same as in the two parental lines. Field Trials Field trials in different climatic conditions provide useful information on the protein levels of cry1ab and cp4 epsps throughout the growth and development of the maize. The file on the NK603xMON810 maize includes data on field trials that were conducted at three sites in France during one growing season (2000). The mean level of the CP4 EPSPS protein across all sites in forage samples from the NK603xMON810 and the single-trait NK603 4

transgenic maize hybrid was comparable. However, a sound variability of the expression level of this protein within NK603 and NK603xMON810 is observed. Therefore, an explanation for the wide range of values for the CP4 EPSPS levels and the resulted high standard deviation should be provided. Given that field trials have already conducted in USA, the data on the CP4 EPSPS expression levels would be useful. Monitoring Plan According to the provisions of annex VII of directive 2001/18/EC, a monitoring plan that takes into consideration the accidental spillage is missing from the dossier. regarding the use of food for human consumption should be added to the dossier. Quantification and Labelling. Problems will arise with the labelling (the 0.9% threshold is not applicable) and the quantification of the hybrid in question. The lack of event specific method for the direct detection of the hybrid leads to over - estimation or sub - estimation of the percentage of the GM DNA. On the other hand the simultaneous detection of both events in a single seed is not considered to be a practical solution. Finally Greece is of the opinion that the paragraphs 2c και ANEX b3 must be clarified further otherwise be removed from the text because are not covered by the scope of the Reg 1829/2003 (art 1 and 15). 3A. Opinion on a draft Commission Decision amending for the second time Decision 2007/31/EC laying down transitional measures as regards the dispatch of certain products of the meat and milk sectors covered by Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council from Bulgaria to other Member States (Item related to the SCFCAH section on Controls and Import Conditions) The Commission proposed to amend and extend the establishment's list of Decision 2007/31/EC based on the favourable results of the last FVO mission. With the support of the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO), Bulgaria carried out an assessment of all processing establishments in those sectors. In that context, Bulgaria has requested the addition of certain establishments listed in the Annex to Decision 2007/31/EC. Bulgarian authorities have given guarantees that these establishments are now fully in compliance with EU requirements. For the sake of clarity, it was appropriate to replace the original list of Decision 2007/31/EC by the Annex to this Decision. Vote: unanimous in favour 5