School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

Similar documents
School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

Assistant Superintendent of Business &

May 15, Dear Parents and Community Members:

DISTRICT LETTERHEAD. REVISED TEMPLATE (Letter Sent on District s Letterhead) School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

Providing Highly-Valued Service Through Leadership, Innovation, and Collaboration

22932 Woodward Ave., Ferndale, MI School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

MACOMB MONTESSORI ACADEMY School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter - REVISED

August 10, School Name Reason(s) for not making AYP Key actions underway to address the issues McKinley Adult and Alternative Education Center

ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2555 S. State Street Ann Arbor, MI www. a2schools.org Pioneer High School Annual Education Report (AER)!

School / District Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

Providing Highly-Valued Service Through Leadership, Innovation, and Collaboration. July 30, Dear Parents and Community Members:

Warren Consolidated Schools

adin Aadin Arts/Rg Disadvantaged ARn English Language 04 All Students % 67,7% 72.7% 0% 72.7% 18.2% Arts I Reading

ESSA Accountability Alignment

Jackson Public Schools

Annual Report on Curriculum, Instruction, and Student Achievement. Canby Public Schools, ISD 891. Systems Accountability. Approved October 14, 2014

These materials are Copyright NCHAM (National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management). All rights reserved. They may be reproduced

Hawaii School for the Deaf & the Blind

Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind

the Deaf and the Blind

ACTION PLAN: REGULAR PROGRAMS AND ADDITIONAL STRATEGIES

Arkansas Association of the Deaf High School Scholarship Program

Hawaii School for the Deaf & the Blind

Commissioner s Update on A F Accountability Model OVERVIEW OF CURRENT WORK-IN-PROGRESS

July 2018 Submission Formatting Information

Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind

Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services Preliminary Data for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in Colorado s Public Schools

Exiting Data Formatting Information

July 2019 Submission Formatting Information

Principal, Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program Class Code: 1450 Work Days: 220

School Consultation Project Application

December 1 Child Count Formatting Information

Total Elementary School Middle School High School Confidence Level = 95% Total Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column %

2016 Student Success Key Performance Indicators

Response to the Language Equality and Acquisition for Deaf Kids (LEAD-K) Task Force Report

Back to Table of Contents. Page 1 of 12 4/25/2017

College of Education and Human Services Exceptional Student & Deaf Education Course Descriptions

A Cross-validation of easycbm Mathematics Cut Scores in. Oregon: Technical Report # Daniel Anderson. Julie Alonzo.

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMES

ADEA Survey of Dental School Seniors, 2015 Graduating Class Tables Report

Grossmont College 2016 Student Success Key Performance Indicators

CASE HISTORY (ADULT) Date form completed:

ATHLETIC TRAINING, MA

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Specialty Endorsement. Application. RICB HIV Specialty Endorsement Application June

H 7978 SUBSTITUTE A ======== LC005519/SUB A ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

LAMAR UNIVERSITY. Mini-Profile A MEMBER OF THE TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM BEAUMONT, TEXAS OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH & REPORTING

The Oral Health Workforce & Access to Dental Care

Deaths in Hawaii Due to Major Cardiovascular Disease

RESPONSE TO THE LANGUAGE EQUALITY AND ACQUISITION FOR DEAF KIDS (LEAD K) TASK FORCE REPORT

PARTICIPATION APPLICATION and AGREEMENT for CULINARY SCHOOL PROGRAM

State Summary Table 1 Child Care Workers/ Educators. Teachers 3 Assistant Teachers 4 Directors FCCH Providers

New Mexico TEAM Professional Development Module: Deaf-blindness

No Child Left Behind and the Testing of Deaf Students

Deaf Studies Program

2016 Pharmacist Re-Licensure Survey Instrument

Preferred contact: home phone cell work phone. Gender: Male Female

GLS Grantee Meeting 2018

STATE SUMMARY Gallaudet Research Institute * 800 Florida Avenue, NE * Washington, DC * ext 5575 Page 1 of 12

STATE SUMMARY Gallaudet Research Institute * 800 Florida Avenue, NE * Washington, DC * ext 5575 Page 1 of 12

STATE SUMMARY Gallaudet Research Institute * 800 Florida Avenue, NE * Washington, DC * ext 5575 Page 1 of 12

Job Description: Special Education Teacher of Deaf and Hard of Hearing

Midwest University. Global Perspective Inventory Study Abroad Form Report

WHY THE OPPORTUNITY/ACHIEVEMENT GAPS ARE SO PERSISTENT AND WHAT WE CAN DO TO CLOSE THEM

Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training Results (2009)

980 North Jefferson Street, Jacksonville, Florida T TDD Toll Free

Minnesota s Alcohol and Drug Counselor Workforce,

Personal Information. Full Name: Address: Primary Phone: Yes No Provider Yes No. Alternate Phone: Yes No Provider Yes No

Demographics and Health Data

Evaluators Perspectives on Research on Evaluation

Center for Health Disparities Research

INDEPENDENT EDUCATIONAL EVALUATIONS

Add Graduate Certificate in Deafness Rehabilitation (UTK Notification)

Arts and Entertainment. Ecology. Technology. History and Deaf Culture

Short-Term Strategic Plan : Creating Conditions to be Ready for Transformation

Midwest University. Global Perspective Inventory New Student Report

Chapter 3 - Deaf-Blindness

Texas A&M University Texarkana. Global Perspective Inventory General Form Report

Class of 2021 Sophomore Parent Counselor Meeting December 5th, 2018

Please remember these are minimum requirements and do not guarantee acceptance into the program.

Intensive Training. Early Childhood Intensive Training K-12 Intensive Training Building Your Future Intensive Training

New Mexico TEAM Professional Development Module: Autism

Enrolment Policy. Holy Trinity SNS

Diabetes - Deaths African Americans and Latinos are more likely to die from diabetes than other Contra Costa residents.

Enclosure B Description of Community Program Planning (CPP) and Local Review Processes PEI Statewide Program Funding Request

THE HEALTH OF CHINESE AMERICANS: 1970 TO TODAY PRESENTED BY KATHY KO CHIN, PRESIDENT AND CEO ASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN HEALTH FORUM

S.O.S. Suicide Prevention Program

Diagnostic Medical Sonography

TEACHERS OF STUDENTS WHO ARE DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING:

Monitoring Weight Status among Women of Reproductive Age. Renato Littaua, DVM, MPVM Healthy Weight and Pregnancy Webinar January 31, 2012.

Instructions: Please respond to each question as accurately as possible. There may be questions where you may indicate more than one response.

MAKING TRANSITION HAPPEN!

Demographics and Health Data

1.2. Please refer to our submission dated 27 February for further background information about NDCS.

STATE BOARD OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES CURRICULUM PROGRAM APPLICATION (New to the System) Pitt Community College Breast Sonography (Certificate) (C45xxx)

Survey of Dentists in Delaware

Pawnee Public Schools. Wellness Policy

HELP MAKE YOUR EVENTS MORE ACCESSIBLE TO PEOPLE WHO ARE HARD OF HEARING OR DEAF

Project Goal(s) and Objectives What is a goal? What is an objective? Measurable Objectives

Frequently asked questions Deaf Education Postgraduate Diploma / MEd

Transcription:

Lincoln Elementary Sam Skeels, Principal 158 S. Scott St Adrian, MI 49221 Phone: 517-265-8544 School (AER) Cover Letter April 29, 2017 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the (AER) which provides key information on the 2016-2017 educational progress for Lincoln Elementary School. The AER addresses the complex reporting information required by federal and state laws. The school s report contains information about student assessment, accountability and teacher quality. If you have any questions about the AER, please contact Sam Skeels, Principal for assistance. The AER is available for you to review electronically by visiting the following web site www.theadrianmaples.com or you may review a copy in our main office at your child s school. The state has identified some schools with the status of Reward, Focus or Priority. A Reward school is one that is outperforming other schools in achievement, growth, or is performing better than other schools with a similar student population. A Focus school is one that has a large achievement gap in 30% of its student achievement scores. A Priority school is one whose achievement and growth is in the lowest 5% of all schools in the state. For 2016-2017, LINCOLN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL did not make any of the following labels: Reward, Priority, or Focus School. While we are pleased to have reached this important goal, we are continuously working to improve. We appreciate the continued support of parents, staff and our community in this effor

Lincoln Elementary is a proud, authorized school for the International Baccalaureate (IB) World School, in the Primary Years Programme. International Baccalaureate represents a standard of excellence in schools round the world. Process of Assigning Pupils to School Lincoln Elementary, as part of the Adrian Public School System, participates in a school of choice cooperative agreement with other schools in the county in accordance with Sections 105 and 105c of the State School Aid Act. School of Choice applications are handled through the board office and are handled individually based upon available spots at every grade level. This process is delineated below. Status of School Improvement Plan Lincoln Elementary School s Improvement Plan aligns with the district s Strategic Plan that includes literacy, with both reading and writing, and math. This process is continually evaluated and revised to meet current student needs. We are in the 3rd year of the school improvement plan. During the 2016-2017 school year, our School Improvement Team met periodically to review our School Improvement Plan and goals established for our building. For 2016-2017, our focus continued in the content areas of Reading, Writing, and Math. On a periodic basis, we met to analyze our achievement data to determine progress made toward the achievement of building goals and increased student academic achievement, with a focus on the bottom 30% of learners. During the 2016-2017 academic year, our building worked to increase our students Literacy proficiency by concentration on Reading for accuracy, comprehension, and detail. In writing, our teachers worked with students on writing with elaboration on specific details and staying on topic. Additionally, our district teachers will continue to work with Instructional Coaches to improve instructional strategies and delivery. Our Math curriculum, Engage NY, provides a structured, information-building base for students that will increase their understanding of more complex Mathematical concepts during their academic careers. The district adopted Atlas Rubicon, which is the K-12 curriculum warehouse for Adrian Public Schools. PBIS was introduced to the building in the 2016-2017 school year 2016-17 Specialized Schools The students of Adrian Public Schools receive special education services through the Lenawee Intermediate School (LISD). In addition to the specialized schools, students receive diagnostic testing, school psychology, school social work, physical and occupational therapy, career technical education, special needs training and speech pathology services. The Lenawee Intermediate School provides educational services to students from birth through age 26 who have severe handicaps. with severe physical, mental, emotional or sensory impairments may receive their educational program at a classroom operated by the LISD. from Adrian Public Schools

attended LISD classroom programs during the 2016-17 school year. The LISD operates the Laura Haviland Program for elementary, middle and high school students with severe emotional and behavioral impairments. 11 students from Adrian Public Schools attended Laura Haviland during the 2016-17 school year. In cooperation with the Lenawee County Probate Court, the LISD operates the juvenile education program housed at the Maurice Spear Campus. LISD operates special education classrooms in local districts including classrooms for students with physical or other health impairments and hearing impairments in Madison; and classrooms for students with cognitive impairments in Tecumseh and Adrian. from Adrian Public Schools attended these programs during the 2016-17 school year. The LISD PREP Academy provides educational programs for teen parents from Lenawee County. During the student's instructional program, childcare support is provided. from Adrian Public Schools attended the LISD PREP Academy during the 2016-17 school year. The LISD TECH Center offers career technical education programs for high school juniors and seniors. 163 students from Adrian Public Schools attended the LISD TECH Center or participated in the co-op/work experience program during 2016-17. This equals 33% of the junior and senior population for this school district. The most recent follow-up of LISD TECH Center students (a 2017 study of 2016 graduates) showed 67.5% were continuing their education. Of those continuing their education, 86.0% were continuing in a field related to their LISD TECH Center program. In addition, 98.6% were working (full-time or part-time) with 1.7% reporting they were unemployed/seeking employment. Of those working full-time, 72.7% were in a field related to their LISD TECH Center program. Local districts operate special education classrooms open to students from other districts. Adrian Public Schools) placed students at JC/LISD academy, Severe Multi Impaired Program at Porter Center, 12 at Cognitive Impaired Program at Sutton Elementary, at Madison Hearing and Impaired program students during the 2015-16 school year. The students of Adrian Public Schools receive special education services through the Lenawee Intermediate School (LISD). In addition to the specialized schools, students receive diagnostic testing, school psychology, school social work, physical and occupational therapy, career technical education, special needs training and speech pathology services. Adrian Public Schools, Prairie Elementary houses the Lower and Upper Cognitive Impaired Programs for elementary students for Adrian Public Schools. In 2016-

2017 school years, the program enrolled an average of 19 students in this program. To Access a Copy of the Core Curriculum Our core curriculum follows the Michigan Common Core State Standards. Teachers are working to develop deep understanding of the Common Core State Standards. A copy of the core curriculum is available for your review in the Lincoln Elementary School Office. Michigan s Common Core State Standards can be viewed on the Michigan Department of Education s website. You can view the curriculum at our Lincoln Elementary s office or on this website: https://theadrianmaples-public.rubiconatlas.org Student Achievement - % of students scoring advanced or proficient Math State Results Results School Results 2014-2015 48.8% 41.6% 55.3% 2015-2016 45.2% 40.9% 35.8% 2016-2017 46.8% 35.70% 39.0% Math State Results Results School Results 2014-2015 41.4% 22.4% 17.7% 2015-2016 44% 23.4% 22.2% 2016-2017 42.6% 29% 14.5% State Results Results School Results 2014-2015 50.1% 43.5% 63.8% 2015-2016 46% 44.4% 52.9% 2016-2017 44.10%.6% 50.0% State Results Results School Results 2014-2015 46.6% 29.7% 19.6% 2015-2016 46.3% 29.4% 37.8% 2016-2017 44% 40.20% 45.0% Parent Teacher Conference Data Fall 2015 Fall 2015 Spring 2016 Spring 2016 # Attending = 292 % Attending = 99 # Attending = 287 % Attending = 98 Fall 2016 Fall 2016 Spring 2017 Spring 2017 # Attending = 336 % Attending = 99 # Attending = 333 % Attending = 98

In Closing, being a part of the largest district in the county, Lincoln students have access to a wide variety of educational opportunities. LINCOLN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL is proud to be authorized as an International Baccalaureate (IB) Primary Years Programme (PYP) World School! Lincoln elementary is the only school in Lenawee County to be authorized as an IB PYP World School. Lincoln is known for its high student retention rate and as a popular school of choice. This is due in part to the low teacher turnover, a high percentage of parent involvement, and heavy emphasis on building and sustaining caring and positive relationships. Most of our students walk to school with some coming from the Schools of Choice option. Please feel free to stop by LINCOLN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL if you would like to discuss this report and the accompanying data. Sincerely, Sam Skeels, Principal

M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not All 2015-16 46.0% 44.4% 52.9% 22.1% 30.9% 25.0% 22.1% All 2016-17 44.1%.6% 60.0% 36.0% 24.0% 22.0% 18.0% Asian 2016-17 63.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Black or African 2015-16 20.0% 30.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Black or African 2016-17 19.9% 16.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Hispanic of Any Race 2015-16 33.5% 34.4% 35.3% 29.4% 5.9% 35.3% 29.4% Hispanic of Any Race 2016-17 32.0% 35.2% 40.0% 10.0% 30.0% 40.0% 20.0% Two or More Races 2015-16 42.9% 50.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Two or More Races 2016-17 41.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 White 2015-16 53.9% 48.6% 60.9% 21.7% 39.1% 21.7% 17.4% White 2016-17 51.7% 43.9% 66.7% 42.4% 24.2% 12.1% 21.2% Female 2015-16 49.5% 49.5% 71.9% 40.6% 31.3% 12.5% 15.6% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 1 of 24

M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not Female 2016-17 47.7%.2% 65.5% 34.5% 31.0% 20.7% 13.8% Male 2015-16 42.6% 40.0% 36.1% 5.6% 30.6% 36.1% 27.8% Male 2016-17 40.7% 39.2% 52.4%.1% 14.3% 23.8% 23.8% Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged 2015-16 31.1% 40.5% 52.4% 16.7% 35.7% 23.8% 23.8% 2016-17 29.1% 33.3% 54.8% 25.8% 29.0% 29.0% 16.1% English Learners 2015-16 31.9% 7.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 With 2015-16 20.7% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 27.3% 72.7% With 2016-17 19.6% 24.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 All 2015-16 46.3% 29.4% 37.8% 22.2% 15.6% 26.7% 35.6% All 2016-17 44.2% 40.2% 44.8% 23.9% 20.9% 26.9% 28.4% Black or African 2015-16 20.4% 15.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Hispanic of Any Race 2015-16 34.4% 20.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 2 of 24

M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not Hispanic of Any Race 2016-17 32.7% 29.6% 25.0% 18.8% 6.3% 37.5% 37.5% Two or More Races 2015-16 43.6%.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Two or More Races 2016-17 40.1% 45.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 White 2015-16 53.9% 34.8% 42.9% 25.0% 17.9% 39.3% 17.9% White 2016-17 51.5% 43.4% 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 22.9% 27.1% Female 2015-16 50.9% 24.3% 47.1% 23.5% 23.5% 17.6% 35.3% Female 2016-17 48.6% 45.0% 62.5% 43.8% 18.8% 21.9% 15.6% Male 2015-16 41.8% 33.6% 32.1% 21.4% 10.7% 32.1% 35.7% Male 2016-17 39.9% 35.8% 28.6% 5.7% 22.9% 31.4% 40.0% Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged 2015-16 30.8% 25.4% 29.4% 11.8% 17.6% 26.5% 44.1% 2016-17 28.6%.5% 45.9% 18.9% 27.0% 21.6% 32.4% English Learners 2015-16 24.3% 7.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 English Learners 2016-17 22.9% 18.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 3 of 24

M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not With 2015-16 17.5% 3.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 With 2016-17 15.8% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 60.0% All 2015-16 45.2% 40.9% 35.8% 3.0% 32.8% 44.8% 19.4% All 2016-17 46.8% 35.7%.8% 8.2% 30.6%.8% 22.4% Asian 2016-17 73.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Black or African 2015-16 17.9% 20.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Black or African 2016-17 20.6% 25.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Hispanic of Any Race 2015-16 31.6% 30.5% 31.3% 6.3% 25.0% 56.3% 12.5% Hispanic of Any Race 2016-17 33.6% 31.0% 30.0% 0.0% 30.0% 40.0% 30.0% Two or More Races 2015-16 40.8% 55.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Two or More Races 2016-17 41.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 White 2015-16 53.2% 44.3% 37.0% 2.2% 34.8% 43.5% 19.6% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 4 of 24

M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not White 2016-17 54.8% 41.2% 40.6% 12.5% 28.1% 40.6% 18.8% Female 2015-16 43.7% 43.5% 41.9% 6.5% 35.5%.7% 19.4% Female 2016-17 45.0% 31.8% 31.0% 3.4% 27.6% 44.8% 24.1% Male 2015-16 46.6%.7% 30.6% 0.0% 30.6% 50.0% 19.4% Male 2016-17 48.5% 40.2% 50.0% 15.0% 35.0% 30.0% 20.0% Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged 2015-16 30.1% 33.8% 36.6% 2.4% 34.1% 43.9% 19.5% 2016-17 31.5% 32.4% 32.3% 3.2% 29.0% 41.9% 25.8% English Learners 2015-16 37.8% 7.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 With 2015-16 21.4% 10.8% 20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% With 2016-17 23.4% 32.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 All 2015-16 44.0% 23.4% 22.2% 2.2% 20.0% 44.4% 33.3% All 2016-17 42.0% 29.6% 14.9% 1.5% 13.4% 46.3%.8% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 5 of 24

M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not Black or African 2015-16 15.1% 7.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Hispanic of Any Race 2015-16 30.6% 20.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Hispanic of Any Race 2016-17 29.1% 18.5% 6.3% 0.0% 6.3% 37.5% 56.3% Two or More Races 2015-16 39.1% 15.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Two or More Races 2016-17 36.4% 40.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 White 2015-16 52.3% 27.3% 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 53.6% 21.4% White 2016-17 49.7% 31.9% 18.8% 2.1% 16.7% 45.8% 35.4% Female 2015-16 42.1% 12.1% 11.8% 0.0% 11.8% 52.9% 35.3% Female 2016-17 39.6% 26.4% 15.6% 3.1% 12.5% 53.1% 31.3% Male 2015-16 45.8% 32.6% 28.6% 3.6% 25.0% 39.3% 32.1% Male 2016-17 44.2% 32.5% 14.3% 0.0% 14.3% 40.0% 45.7% Economically Disadvantaged 2015-16 27.9% 20.8% 14.7% 0.0% 14.7% 44.1% 41.2% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 6 of 24

M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not Economically Disadvantaged 2016-17 25.8% 23.6% 8.1% 0.0% 8.1% 45.9% 45.9% English Learners 2015-16 27.4% 6.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 English Learners 2016-17 25.5% 8.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 With 2015-16 19.2% 9.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 With 2016-17 16.7% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% All 2015-16 14.7% 9.7% 15.9% 4.5% 11.4% 29.5% 54.5% All 2016-17 14.6% 10.4% 1.5% 0.0% 1.5% 29.9% 68.7% Black or African 2015-16 2.4% 0.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Hispanic of Any Race 2015-16 6.6% 6.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Hispanic of Any Race 2016-17 6.7% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% Two or More Races 2015-16 12.5% 8.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Two or More Races 2016-17 13.0% 20.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 7 of 24

M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not White 2015-16 18.4% 12.2% 17.9% 3.6% 14.3% 32.1% 50.0% White 2016-17 18.2% 11.1% 2.1% 0.0% 2.1% 31.3% 66.7% Female 2015-16 13.0% 3.8% 17.6% 5.9% 11.8% 17.6% 64.7% Female 2016-17 12.6% 5.5% 3.1% 0.0% 3.1% 37.5% 59.4% Male 2015-16 16.4% 14.6% 14.8% 3.7% 11.1% 37.0% 48.1% Male 2016-17 16.5% 15.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.9% 77.1% Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged 2015-16 6.6% 6.8% 6.1% 0.0% 6.1% 30.3% 63.6% 2016-17 6.8% 8.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 27.0% 73.0% English Learners 2015-16 2.9% 0.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 English Learners 2016-17 4.3% 0.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 With 2015-16 5.3% 3.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 With 2016-17 5.3% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 8 of 24

SAT Location Name School Year Subject Student Group Mean SAT Score Benchmark Met or Exceeded % Met or Exceeded Did Not Meet % Did Not Meet Number Assessed No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 9 of 24

MI-Access Functional Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Surpassed Attained Emerging No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 10 of 24

MI-Access Supported Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Surpassed Attained Emerging No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 11 of 24

MI-Access Participation Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Surpassed Attained Emerging No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 12 of 24

Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Subject State Tested Total State Tested Total * School Tested Total School ** All 98.6% 49.5% 99.5%.2% 100.0% 50.9% All 98.7% 39.1% 99.5% 25.4% 99.2% 25.2% All 97.9% 24.9% 99.4% 16.8% 100.0% 1.5% All Social Studies 97.8% 33.7% 99.1% 24.2% N/A N/A Bottom 30% N/A 3.8% N/A 0.0% N/A 0.0% Bottom 30% N/A 1.5% N/A 0.0% N/A 0.0% Bottom 30% N/A 0.4% N/A 0.0% N/A <30 Bottom 30% Social Studies N/A 0.6% N/A 0.0% N/A N/A Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native 97.6% 40.5% <30 <30 N/A N/A 97.8% 28.8% <30 <30 N/A N/A 96.8% 19.1% <30 <30 N/A N/A Social Studies 96.4% 28.9% <30 <30 N/A N/A Asian 99.1% 70.5% <30 <30 <30 <30 Asian 99.3% 68.9% <30 <30 <30 <30 Asian 99.1% 41.4% <30 <30 N/A N/A Asian Social Studies 98.9% 51.9% <30 <30 N/A N/A Black or African Black or African Black or African Black or African Hispanic of Any Race Hispanic of Any Race 97.6% 25.0% 100.0% 23.1% <30 <30 97.5% 14.2% 100.0% 11.5% <30 <30 96.0% 7.0% 100.0% 3.3% N/A N/A Social Studies 95.9% 11.2% 100.0% 6.5% N/A N/A 98.6% 36.9% 100.0% 29.6% <30 <30 98.7% 25.1% 100.0% 15.6% <30 <30 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 13 of 24

Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Subject State Tested Total State Tested Total * School Tested Total School ** Hispanic of Any Race Hispanic of Any Race Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races Two or More Races Two or More Races Two or More Races 97.7% 13.5% 100.0% 9.5% <30 <30 Social Studies 97.8% 21.1% 99.5% 16.0% N/A N/A 97.7% 54.8% <30 <30 N/A N/A 98.1% 43.4% <30 <30 N/A N/A 97.6% 28.3% <30 <30 N/A N/A Social Studies 98.1%.8% <30 <30 N/A N/A 98.7% 46.6% 97.9% 32.2% <30 <30 98.6% 35.1% 97.9% 26.4% <30 <30 97.7% 21.9% 96.4% 16.0% <30 <30 Social Studies 97.7% 29.7% 94.6% 18.2% N/A N/A White 98.9% 56.1% 99.3% 44.9% 100.0% 56.3% White 99.0% 45.6% 99.3% 31.3% 98.8% 27.9% White 98.4% 29.7% 99.5% 21.9% 100.0% 2.1% White Social Studies 98.3% 39.7% 99.2% 30.6% N/A N/A Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged 98.2% 33.5% 99.5% 32.0% 100.0% 49.3% 98.3% 23.3% 99.6% 19.4% 100.0% 19.4% 97.2% 13.0% 99.8% 11.4% 100.0% 0.0% Social Studies 97.0% 18.3% 99.3% 16.3% N/A N/A A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 14 of 24

Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Subject State Tested Total State Tested Total * School Tested Total School ** English Learners English Learners English Learners English Learners With With With With 98.6% 24.0% 100.0% 12.5% <30 <30 99.0% 23.0% 100.0% 18.1% <30 <30 98.4% 5.0% 100.0% 2.9% <30 <30 Social Studies 98.2% 7.8% 100.0% 16.7% N/A N/A 97.5% 26.0% 98.7% 16.3% <30 <30 97.9% 20.7% 99.6% 11.1% <30 <30 96.9% 15.8% 99.0% 10.2% <30 <30 Social Studies 95.9% 14.2% 97.9% 13.3% N/A N/A A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 15 of 24

Accountability Details Graduation Data Student Group Statewide School All 79.65% 78.68% N/A Indian or Alaska Native 66.57% 100.00% N/A Asian 90.20% 92.86% N/A Black or African 67.36% 56.25% N/A Hispanic of Any Race 72.60% 78.21% N/A Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 77.68% N/A N/A Two or More Races 73.67% 100.00% N/A White 83.% 79.45% N/A Female 83.46% N/A N/A Male 76.04% N/A N/A Economically Disadvantaged 67.10% 70.25% N/A English Learners 72.11% 63.16% N/A With 55.35% 48.00% N/A Bottom 30% N/A N/A N/A * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 16 of 24

Accountability Details Attendance Data Student Group Statewide School All 84.41% 84.24% 87.70% * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 17 of 24

Accountability Index Data School Name Proficiency Index Value Growth Index Value Graduation Rate Index Value EL Progress Index Value School Quality/Student Success Index Value General Participation Index Value EL Participation Index Value Overall Index Value Lincoln Elementary School 68.84 50.97 N/A N/A 88.76 100.00 N/A 65.47 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 18 of 24

Teacher Quality - Qualification Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School Other B.A. M.A. P.H.D. 0 7 13 0 Professional Qualifications are defined by the State and may include information such as the degrees of public school teachers (e.g., percentage of teachers with Bachelors Degrees or Masters Degrees) or the percentage of fully certified teachers Teacher Quality - Class School Aggregate High-Poverty Schools Low-Poverty Schools age of Core Academic Subject Elementary and Secondary School Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers 0.0% N/A N/A Teacher Quality - Provisional Certification age of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School with Emergency or Provisional Certification 20.0% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 19 of 24

NAEP Grade 4 Math of below Basic Basic Advanced All 100 25 39 28 7 Male Female 50 50 25 25 39 42 28 26 7 6 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 48 43 1 40 12 42 36 17 39 2 13 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 65 17 8 5 &#8225 4 17 55 39 9 24 41 36 43 21 37 34 9 15 42 26 8 1 4 28 12 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 11 89 59 21 28 40 11 30 2 8 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 8 92 41 24 40 39 16 29 2 8 Reporting Standards not met. Note: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education s. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2017 Achievement. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 20 of 24

NAEP Grade 8 Math of below Basic Basic Advanced All 100 33 35 22 9 Male Female 51 49 35 32 34 37 21 23 10 7 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 41 58 1 52 20 32 13 29 2 13 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 71 15 7 4 1 3 26 67 48 13 40 24 36 23 27 8 12 27 16 10 1 3 6 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 46 58 45 20 37 15 29 3 13 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 6 94 75 31 23 26 2 24 # 9 Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education s. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2017 Achievement. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 21 of 24

NAEP Grade 4 Reading of below Basic Basic Advanced All 100 33 35 22 9 Male Female 51 49 35 32 34 37 21 23 10 7 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 41 58 1 52 20 32 13 29 2 13 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 71 15 7 4 1 3 26 67 48 13 40 24 36 23 27 8 12 27 16 10 1 3 6 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 46 58 45 20 37 15 29 3 13 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 6 94 75 31 23 36 2 24 # 9 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education s, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2017 Reading Assessment. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 22 of 24

NAEP Grade 8 Reading of below Basic Basic Advanced All 100 33 35 22 9 Male Female 51 49 35 32 34 37 21 23 10 7 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 41 58 1 52 20 32 13 29 2 13 Race/Ethnicity White Black or Afican Hispanic Asian/Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Indian or Alaska Native Two or More Races 71 15 7 4 1 3 26 67 48 13 40 24 36 23 27 8 12 27 16 10 1 3 6 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 46 58 45 20 37 15 29 3 13 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 6 94 75 31 23 36 2 24 # 9 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education s, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2017 Reading Assessment. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 23 of 24

NAEP Participation Data Grade Subject Participation Rate for with Standard Error Participation Rate for Limited English Standard Error 4 Math Reading 81 82 2.7 3.3 94 90 2.7 3.4 8 Math Reading 85 84 2.4 2.4 86 92 3.2 1.9 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 24 of 24