Management of Cardiogenic shock. Prof. Christian JM Vrints

Similar documents
DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Intraaortic Balloon Counterpulsation- Supportive Data for a Role in Cardiogenic Shock ( Be Still My Friend )

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock The Cardiologist s view ACCA Masterclass 2017

Cardiogenic Shock. Carlos Cafri,, MD

What is new in the Treatment of STEMI? Malcolm R. Bell, MBBS Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN

How to do Primary Angioplasty. - Patients with Cardiogenic Shock

Rationale for Prophylactic Support During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction & Cardiogenic Shock. - What Should We Do?

Bridging With Percutaneous Devices: Tandem Heart and Impella

Οξύ στεφανιαίο σύνδρομο και καρδιογενής καταπληξία. Επεμβατική προσέγγιση. Σωτήριος Πατσιλινάκος Κωνσταντοπούλειο Γ.Ν. Ν. Ιωνίας

STEMI AND MULTIVESSEL CORONARY DISEASE

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

IABP SHOCK II trial:

A Future for the IABP in Cardiogenic Shock? Holger Thiele Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care) University of Lübeck, Germany

STEMI and Cardiogenic Shock. The rules and solution. Dave Kettles St Dominics and Frere Hospitals East London ZA

Counterpulsation. John N. Nanas, MD, PhD. Professor and Head, 3 rd Cardiology Dept, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Approach to Multi Vessel disease with STEMI

The Case for Multivessel Revascularization in Shock

PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK

Cindy L. Grines MD FACC FSCAI

Cardiogenic shock: Current management

Assist Devices in STEMI- Intra-aortic Balloon Pump

Emergency surgery in acute coronary syndrome

The Window for Fibrinolysis. Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD Leuven, Belgium

Circulatory Support: From IABP to LVAD

The development of cardiogenic shock portends an extremely poor prognosis. Cardiogenic Shock: A Lethal Complication of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Updated and Guideline Based Treatment of Patients with STEMI

Why we need a consensus document on cardiogenic shock? ACCA Masterclass 2017

Can Angiographic Complete Revascularization Improve Outcomes for Patients with Decreased LV Function? NO!

Controversies In STEMI Management

CULPRIT-SHOCK: A Randomized Trial of Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock. Holger Thiele, MD on behalf of the CULPRIT-SHOCK Investigators

Rationale for Left Ventricular Support During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

A case of post myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture CHRISTOFOROS KOBOROZOS, MD

Cardiogenic Shock. Dr. JPS Henriques. Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam The Netherlands

PPCI in STEMI. ESC at the 22nd Annual Conference of the Saudi Heart Association February 21th, 2011

Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock. 24 th Annual San Diego Heart Failure Symposium Ryan R Reeves, MD FSCAI

CARDIOGENIC SHOCK. Antonio Pesenti. Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo Monza (MI)

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Definition. Low-cardiac-output state resulting in life threatening end-organ hypoperfusion. Criteria: MAP 30 mm Hg lower than baseline)

Management of Cardiogenic Shock. Dr Stephen Pettit, Consultant Cardiologist

Current Advances and Best Practices in Acute STEMI Management A pharmacoinvasive approach

Clinical Seminar. Which Diabetic Patient is a Candidate for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - European Perspective

What do the guidelines say?

Mild Hypothermia in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction the Randomized SHOCK-COOL Trial

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME PCI IN THE ELDERLY

Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction

The majority of patients with cardiomyopathy

2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Recovering Hearts. Saving Lives.

STEMI update. Vijay Krishnamoorthy M.D. Interventional Cardiology

Pharmaco-Invasive Approach for STEMI

Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support for treatment and prevention of hemodynamic instability Engström, A.E.

How to approach non-infarct related artery disease in patients with STEMI in a limited resource setting

Management of Acute Shock and Right Ventricular Failure

Cardiogenic Shock and Initiatives to Reduce Mortality

Ischemic Heart Disease Interventional Treatment

New Horizons in Cardiogenic Shock. Timothy D. Henry, MD Director of Cardiology Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute

Ischemic Heart Disease Interventional Treatment

Unprotected LM intervention

Culprit PCI vs MultiVessel PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Target vessel only revascularization versus complet revascularization in non culprit lesions in acute myocardial infarction treated by primary PCI

Cath Lab Essentials : LV Assist Devices for Hemodynamic Support (IABP, Impella, Tandem Heart, ECMO)

Low cardiac output & Mechanical Support นายแพทย อรรถภ ม ส ศ ภอรรถ ศ ลยศาสตร ห วใจและทรวงอก โรงพยาบาล ราชว ถ

STEMI Stents What next? Arshad Khan - HNE Clinical Research Fellow. Supervisors: Prof Boyle and Attia.

Cardiovascular Health Nova Scotia Update to Antiplatelet Sections of the Nova Scotia Guidelines for Acute Coronary Syndromes, 2008.

MANAGEMENT OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK

Management of new-onset AF: Initial rate control treatment

Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Is it beneficial to patients?

TREATMENT OF HIGHER RISK PATIENTS INTRODUCTION TO PROTECTED PCI WITH IMPELLA. IMP v4

LM stenting - Cypher

Who is the high risk patient?

Guideline compliance, utilization trends

University of Leipzig Heart Center

Cardiogenic Shock in Acute MI

2010 ACLS Guidelines. Primary goals of therapy for patients

Nova Scotia Guidelines for Acute Coronary Syndromes (Updating the 2008 Antiplatelet Section of the Guidelines)

Li Xu 1, MD, Hao Sun 1, MD, Le-Feng Wang 1, MD, Xin-Chun Yang 1, MD, Kui-Bao Li 1, MD, Da-Peng Zhang 1, MD, Hong-Shi Wang 1, MD, Wei-Ming Li 1, MD

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

Introduction to Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support

presenters 2010 Sameh Sabet Ain Shams University

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Cindy Baker, MD FACC Director Peripheral Vascular Interventions Division of Cardiovascular Medicine

Update on the management of STEMI. Elliot Rapaport, M.D. San Francisco, CA December 14, 2007

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Sonny Achtchi, DO

Management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction Update 2009 Late comers: which options?

Guideline for STEMI. Reperfusion at a PCI-Capable Hospital

Continuing Medical Education Post-Test

CHRONIC HEART FAILURE : WHAT ELSE COULD WE OFFER TO OUR PATIENTS? Cardiac Rehabilitation Society of Thailand

Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Timing of Surgery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Transfer in D2B. Scott D Friedman, MD FACC Medical Director, Cardiology Services Shore Health System of Maryland. The Problem

This House believes that experience and size is not relevant

PUMP FAILURE COMPLICATING AMI: ISCHAEMIC VSR

Alex versus Xience Registry Preliminary report

'Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndromes: perioperative strategies to improve outcome'

FFR in Multivessel Disease

HOW TO PERFORM LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSISTANCE IN THE CATHLAB. Andreas Baumbach, MD FESC FRCP Bristol Heart Institute University Hospitals Bristol UK

Factors Associated with In-hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Myocardial Infarction In Dr.Yahya Kiwan

Is Cangrelor hype or hope in STEMI primary PCI?

Transcription:

Management of Cardiogenic shock Prof. Christian JM Vrints

none conflicts

Management of Cardiogenic Shock Incidence and trends Importance of early revascularization Multivessel disease Left main disease

Incidence & Causes Cardiogenic Shock NRMI registry 1995-2004 Cardiogenic shock occurs in 8.6% of the acute MI patients On admission: 29% During hospitalization: 71% A Babaev et al. JAMA. 2005;294(4):448-454 LV dysfunctionµ 78,5 SHOCK trial otherµ 6,7 Pericardial Tamponadeµ 1,4 Right Ventricular Acute Shockµ Mitral 2,8 Regurgitationµ Ventricular 6,9 Septal Defectµ 3,9 JS Hochman et al. N Engl J Med 1999;341:625-34

Ten-Year Trends in the Incidence and Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock - AMIS Plus Registry RV Jeger et al. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:618-626

Cardiogenic Shock Spiral Acute Myocardial Infarction LV-Dysfunction systolic diastolic Inotropes/ Vasopressors Cardiac Output Stroke volume LVEDP Lung edema Mechanical Support: IABP/LVAD Reperfusion: PCI/CABG Peripheral Perfusion Vasoconstriction Fluid retention Hypotension Coronaryperfusion Ischemia Hypoxia Progressive LV-Dysfunction Death Thiele et al. Eur Heart J 2010;31:1828-1835

Cardiogenic Shock Spiral Acute Myocardial Infarction LV-Dysfunction systolic diastolic Inotropes/ Vasopressors + + SIRS Cardiac Output Stroke volume LVEDP Lung edema Mechanical Support: IABP/LVAD Reperfusion: PCI/CABG + Bleeding/ Transfusion + enos inos NO Peroxynitrite IL-6 TNF-α Peripheral Perfusion Vasoconstriction Fluid retention Hypotension Coronaryperfusion Ischemia Hypoxia Progressive LV-Dysfunction SVR Pro-Inflammation Catecholamine sensitivity Contractility Death SIRS: Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Thiele et al. Eur Heart J 2010;31:1828-1835

Management of Cardiogenic Shock Incidence and trends Importance of early revascularization Multivessel disease Left main disease

What do the guidelines recommend? ESC STEMI Guidelines 2008 Primary PCI Class level Preferred treatment if performed by an experienced team as soon as possible after FMC I A Time from FMC to balloon inflation should be <2 h in any case and <90 min in patients presenting early (e.g.,2 h) with large infarct and low bleeding risk Indicated for patients in shock and those with contraindications to fibrinolytic therapy irrespective of time delay I B I B F Van de Werf et al. Eur Heart J 2008; 29, 2909 2945

The SHOCK Trial has been the most important study for management guidelines in patients with cardiogenic shock JS Hochman et al. N Engl J Med 1999;341:625-34

Survival % Early Revascularization and 1 Year Survival-SHOCK trial Medical therapy 60 50 40 30 20 Revascularization p=0.11 p=0.03 p=0.03 54 44 50 47 37 34 13% absolute increase in 1 year survival in patients assigned to early revascularization number needed to treat of <8 patients to save 1 life 10 0 30 days 6 months 1 year JS Hochman et al. JAMA. 2001;285:190-192

SHOCK trial: CABG vs. PCI PCI (%) CABG (%) p-value -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Diabetes 26.9 48.9 0.02 LMCA 13.0 41.3 0.001 3 vessel disease 60.3 80.4 0.03 coronary jeopardy score 7.1±3.2 9.9±2.3 0.0001 HD White et al. Circulation. 2005;112:1992-2001.

SHOCK trial : important limitations! No randomization between PCI or CABG: selection bias undoubtedly influenced results Old fashioned PCI methods: Low use of coronary stents SHOCK: 37% SHOCK registry: 24% Low use of IIb IIIa antagonists: SHOCK: 69% SHOCK registry: 7% No use of bivalirudin or DES No thrombus aspiration

Influence of Stenting and IIb/IIIa Inhibition (ACC-NCDR) LW Klein et al. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:35 41

Decreasing in-hospital mortality with increasing rates of early PCI in patients with cardiogenic shock STEMI registry Germany % 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 72,2 early PCI 67,7 mortality 56,1 46,4 1994-96 1997-98 1999-00 2001-02 2007-08 38,1 U Zeymer et al. ESC Congress Barcelona 2009

What to do in multivessel disease & cardiogenic shock?

Many good reasons not to perform urgent CABG in cardiogenic shock STEMI = a clinical storm worst setting for performing a CABG Increased risks for complications: ~prothrombotic & inflammatory milieu in the early phase of acute MI: aggravation of SIRS lesion severity in nonculprit vessels is frequently overestimated ~diffuse coronary vasoconstriction

Eur Heart Journal 2011 32, 396 403

Multivessel PCI during STEMI is associated with higher short- and long-term mortality HORIZONS-AMI 1 Meta-Analysis 2 1-time multivessel PCI Staged multivessel PCI Multivessel vs. Staged PCI Culprit vs. Staged PCI Culprit vs. Multivessel PCI 30 day mortality 0.1 1 10 100 Odds Ratio 1. R Kornowski et al. JACC 2011;58:704 11 2. PJ Vlaar et al. JACC 2011;58:692-703

What do the guidelines recommend? ESC - myocardial revascularization 2010 Emergency angiography and revascularization of all critically narrowed arteries by PCI/CABG as appropriate is indicated in patients in cardiogenic shock. Class of recommendation : Level of evidence: Evidence : SHOCK trial I B W Wijns et al. 2010

SHOCK trial: angiographic & PCI findings Multivessel disease 81% PCI of infarct related artery only 87% Complete revascularization 23% HD White et al. Circulation. 2005;112:1992-2001.

STEMI with MVD & cardiogenic shock: single or multivessel PCI? In hospital outcomes shock pts. National Cardiovascular Data Registry Odds ratios mortality 1 vessel PCI Multivessel PCI Patients 2654 433 p value Death 27.8% 36.5% <0.01 Death in lab 2.7% 5.8% 0.25 Stroke 1.5% 2.6% 0.18 Bleeding 12.5% 13.8% 0.44 Renal failure 7.1% 9.7% 0.03 Multi- vs. 1-vessel PCI MA Cavender et al. Am J Cardiol 2009;104: 507-513

STEMI with MVD & cardiogenic shock: single or multivessel PCI? EHS-PCI registry T Bauer et al. Am J Cardiol 2012 in press.

Cardiogenic Shock: CABG or PCI for Left Main Disease? SHOCK trial & registry PCI procedural details Multivessel PCI 11.1% Stenting 28.4% IIB-IIIA used 6.6% Patients turned down by the surgeons? MS Lee et al. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:29-34

GRACE registry: unprotected left main revascularization in ACS Cumulative mortality In-hospital death PCI CABG 20 10 PCI conservative CABG % 50 40 30 20 10 P=0.001 11 5,4 40 P=0.71 30 P=0.01 13 5 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Days since admission 0 all pts. n=1797 SCD or Shock n=59 STEMI or LBBB n=627 G Montalescot et al. Eur Heart J 2009; 30;2308-2317

GRACE registry: unprotected left main revascularization in ACS Temporal trends in GRACE score severity (A) and type of revascularization (B) Timing of revascularization G Montalescot et al. Eur Heart J 2009; 30;2308-2317

PCI for Left Main Disease in Acute MI Period Patients n Cardiogenic shock (%) Stents used (%) IIb-IIIa Used (%) Early Mortality (%) SHOCK 1993-1998 85 100 28.4 6.6 84 Late Mortality (%) (follow up) G De Luca et al. 1990-2001 24 63 58 21 63 0.5 (37±23 months) SW Lee et al. 1997-2002 18 78 100 67 44 0 (39±22 months) MS Lee et al. 2002-2004 62 24 100 35 8 19 (586±431 days) CH Tan et al. 2003-2005 16 69 100 0 46 0 (420 days) SB Prasad et al. 2004-2007 62 62 96 54 35 0.6 (26±12 months) Pappalardo A et al. 2005-2008 48 45 100 (61% DES) GB Pedrazzini et al. 2005-2010 348 12 100 (78% DES) 52 21 32 (CS) 10.5 (1 year) 32 11 NA G De Luca et al. Am J Cardiol 2003;91:235-238 SW Lee et al. Int J Cardiol 2004;97:73-76 MS Lee et al. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:29-34 CH Tan et al. Int J Cardiol 2008;126:224-228 SB Prassad et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;73:301-307 A Pappalardo et al. JACC Intv. 2011;4;618-626 GB Pedrazzini et al. JACC Intv 2011;4;627-633

Meta-analysis of IABP in STEMI : should we change the guidelines? Cardiogenic shock patients Beneficial effect of IABP with thrombolysis IABP pts younger IABP pts more rescue PCI No IABP in the sickest Detrimental effect of IABP with ppci IABP in transferred pts IABP in sickest pts KD Sjauw et al. Eur Heart J (2009) 30: 459-468

BCIS-1: Elective Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation During High-Risk PCI Divaka Perera et al. JAMA. 2010;304(8):867-874

IABP SHOCK II: No survival benefit of balloon pump in AMI with shock H Thiele, U Zeymer et al. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1287-96.

Treatment Algorithm for Cardiogenic Shock Acute MI & Cardiogenic Shock Fluids for optimal preload Vasopressors - Inotropes Early Revascularization 1 2 vessel disease Moderate 3 vessel disease Left main disease Severe 3 vessel disease PCI infarct related artery CABG Acute multivessel PCI Staged multivessel PCI Staged CABG - MCS HTX + Weaning