Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of the Digoxin-Amiodarone Interaction

Similar documents
BASIC PHARMACOKINETICS

PHA5128 Dose Optimization II Case Study I Spring 2013

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Transplant Proc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 April 6.

Effect of multiple doses of losartan on the pharmacokinetics

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Pharmacokinetics Overview

Basic Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics: An Integrated Textbook with Computer Simulations

Comparative Study of Different Digoxin Treatment Regimens in Egyptian Hospitals. For Partial Fulfillment of Master Degree in Pharmaceutical Sciences

PHA 5128 CASE STUDY 5 (Digoxin, Cyclosporine, and Methotrexate) Spring 2007

Drug Dosing in Renal Insufficiency. Coralie Therese D. Dimacali, MD College of Medicine University of the Philippines Manila

Flecainide pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers: the influence of urinary ph

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Transplant Proc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 September 22.

Stability of thyroxine and triiodothyronine in

Section 5.2: Pharmacokinetic properties

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Tamer Barakat. Abdul Aziz ALShamali. Abdul Aziz ALShamali

Pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen in man. I. Free and total

PHA Second Exam Fall On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid in doing this assignment.

Metformin Associated Lactic Acidosis. Jun-Ki Park 9/6/11

TDM. Measurement techniques used to determine cyclosporine level include:

Basic Concepts of TDM

Adjusting phenytoin dosage in complex patients: how to win friends and influence patient outcomes

Renal Impairment From Dettli to Guideline: What can we learn?

dronedarone, 400mg, film-coated tablets (Multaq ) SMC No. (636/10) Sanofi-aventis Ltd

PHA Second Exam. Fall On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid in doing this assignment.

PHARMACOKINETICS OF DRUG ABSORPTION

DBC s panel of thyroid hormone immunoassays is now more comprehensive with the new Reverse T3 ELISA kit. Test Your Hormones

Lippincott Questions Pharmacology

Excretion of Drugs. Prof. Hanan Hagar Pharmacology Unit Medical College

1. If the MTC is 100 ng/ml and the MEC is 0.12 ng/ml, which of the following dosing regimen(s) are in the therapeutic window?

Rate-Dependent Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine, Procainamide and Amiodarone on Intraventricular Conduction

Evaluation of the Cockroft Gault, Jelliffe and Wright formulae in estimating renal function in elderly cancer patients

General Principles of Pharmacology and Toxicology

PHA First Exam. Fall 2004

PHA 5127 FINAL EXAM FALL On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid in doing this assignment.

N-monodesmethyldiltiazem is the predominant metabolite of

General Principles of Pharmacology and Toxicology

PHA Final Exam Fall 2006

The comparative effects of verapamil and a new dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker on digoxin pharmacokinetics

PHA Case Studies V (Answers)

PHA First Exam Fall 2003

Basic Pharmacokinetic Principles Stephen P. Roush, Pharm.D. Clinical Coordinator, Department of Pharmacy

PHA Final Exam. Fall On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid in doing this assignment.

PHA Second Exam. Fall On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid in doing this assignment.

IDEXX Catalyst One Chemistry Analyzer for In-house Measurement of Total Thyroxine (TT 4 ) Concentration in Serum from Dogs and Cats

Pharmacokinetics of propofol when given by intravenous

TDM of Digoxin. Use of Digoxin Serum Concentrations to Alter Dosages

TDM Lecture 7 5 th Stage. TDM of Digoxin. Uses: Digoxin is usually used in heart failure associated and atrial fibrillation.

The potentiation of acenocoumarol anticoagulant effect by amiodarone

Effect of Amiodarone on Serum Triiodothyronine, Reverse Triiodothyronine, Thyroxin, and Thyrotropin

Pharmacokinetics I. Dr. M.Mothilal Assistant professor

C OBJECTIVES. Basic Pharmacokinetics LESSON. After completing Lesson 2, you should be able to:

DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF DIURETIC RESISTANCE. Jules B. Puschett, M.D.

Amiodarone Prescribing and Monitoring: Back to the Future

ance of the sugar, until at plasma levels of 140 mgm. per cent the creatinine/sugar clearance ratio

Variation in drug responses & Drug-Drug Interactions

Full title of guideline INTRAVENOUS VANCOMYCIN PRESCRIBING AND MONITORING GUIDELINE FOR ADULT PATIENTS. control

Comparison of Serum Cystatin C and Creatinine Levels to Evaluate Early Renal Function after Kidney Transplantation

Digoxin And Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Heart Failure: Does Serum Digoxin Concentration Matter?

General renal pathophysiology

Individual Study Table Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume: Page:

PHARMACODYNAMICS OF CARDIAC GLYCOSIDES

Comparison of Three Whole Blood Creatinine Methods for Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Before Radiographic Contrast Administration

StRs and CT doctors in haematology. September Folinic acid dose modified.

Chapter 12 DRUG THERAPY 2001 Dennis A. Noe

Pharmacokinetics and allometric scaling of levormeloxifene, a selective oestrogen receptor modulator

R. B. VAUGHAN. M.B., B.S., Ph.D. Clinical Research Department, Pfizer Limited tion of the indanyl ester. Serum levels were also

The NGAL Turbidimetric Immunoassay Reagent Kit

PHA 5128 Spring 2000 Final Exam

man of the effects of diabetes and of insulin on the maximum ability of the tubules to reabsorb glucose.

Supporting Materials for a 31-Day Study of Cobalt(II)chloride Ingestion in Humans: Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Effects

PRODUCT MONOGRAPH. Digoxin Tablets C.S.D mg, mg, 0.25 mg. Cardiotonic Glycoside

PRODUCT MONOGRAPH. DIGOXIN INJECTION, C.S.D. Digoxin Injection, C.S.D., 0.25 mg/ml

Atrial Fibrillation: Rate vs. Rhythm. Michael Curley, MD Cardiac Electrophysiology

Multiple IV Bolus Dose Administration

1.2 Synonyms There are several synonyms e.g. diaminomethanal, but in a medical context, this substance is always referred to as urea.

AXITAB-CV TAB. COMPOSITION :

BIOPHARMACEUTICS and CLINICAL PHARMACY

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES, ST AUGUSTINE

The kidney. (Pseudo) Practical questions. The kidneys are all about keeping the body s homeostasis. for questions Ella

Excretion Data for Cefazolin and Cephalothin After Intravenous and Intramuscular Administration in Humans

Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics

Radioimmunoassay of serum digoxin in relation to digoxin intoxication

Impaired glucose tolerance and growth hormone in chronic liver disease

Assessment of glomerular filtration rate in healthy subjects and normoalbuminuric diabetic patients: validity of a new (MDRD) prediction equation

Renal Disease and PK/PD. Anjay Rastogi MD PhD Division of Nephrology

Vancomycin Pharmacokinetics in Normal and Morbidly Obese Subjects

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARATERISTICS HYPERIUM. I.N.N. : Rilmenidine

Mouse/Rat THYROXINE (T4) ELISA Catalog No (96 Tests)

Clinical pharmacokinetics of meropenem after the first and tenth intramuscular administration

Disposition of metronidazole and its effects on sulphasalazine

pharmacokinetics and tolerability of rizatriptan in healthy

Cambridge CB2 3EG. ['25I]L-thyroxine. Experiments were performed after 24 hr had elapsed.

Triiodothyronine (T3) ELISA

Neither activated charcoal nor whole bowel irrigation (WBI) is indicated in the routine management of acute or chronic lithium toxicity.

SIFROL â. Contraindications Hypersensitivity to pramipexole or any other component of the product.

Keywords: bolus i.v. injection, inulin clearance, kinetic analysis

RADIOIMMUNOASSAY OF THYROID RELATED HORMONES AND TSH IN PRIMARY HYPERTHYROIDISM

PHA Final Exam. Fall On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid in doing this assignment.

Transcription:

108 JACC Vol. 5. No. I Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of the Digoxin-Amiodarone Interaction PAUL E. FENSTER, MD, FACC, NEAL W. WHITE, JR., MD, CHRISTINE D. HANSON, RN Tucson, Arizona Amiodarone is known to raise serum digoxin levels. This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic basis of this interaction in 10 normal subjects. The pharmacokinetic variables for digoxin were determined after a 1.0 mg intravenous dose of digoxin in each subject, before and after oral amiodarone, 400 mg daily for 3 weeks. During amiodarone administration, systemic clearance of digoxin was reduced from 234 ± 72 ml/min (mean ± standard deviation) to 172 ± 33 ml/min (p < 0.01). This was due to reductions in both renal clearance (from 105 ± 39 to 84 ± 15 ml/min) (p < 0.05) and nonrenal clearance (from 130 ± 38 to 88 ± 20 ml/min) (p < 0.01). Digoxin half-life of elimination was prolonged from 34 ± 13 to 40 ± 16 hours (p < 0.05). Digoxirl volume of distribution was not significantly changed. Amiodarone caused a three- to fivefoldincrease in setum reverse triiodothyronine levels, but changes in thyroid function were not quantitatively related to the changes in digoxin pharmacokinetics. These alterations in digoxin pharmacokinetics produced by amiodarone explain the increase in serum digoxin level that has been observed when this drug combination has been used clinically. (J Am Coli CardioI1985;5:108-12) Numerous drugs are known to alter the pharmacokinetic behavior of digoxin. Amiodarone has been found to raise serum digoxin concentrations (1-5); however, there is little infomiation regarding the mechanism and clinical significance of this interaction. This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic nature of the digoxin-amiodarone interaction. Methods Study subjects. Ten normal adult volunteers entered and completed the study. After a thorough review ofthe possible risks associated with amiodarone administration, the protocol was approved by the Human Subjects Committee of the University of Arizona. Informed written consent was obtained from each subject before enrollment. In addition, permission to use amiodarone in normal human volunteers was secured through an Investigational New Drug application to the Food and Drug Administration. All subjects were men aged 21 to 36 years. All had unremarkable med- From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Arizona. This work was done during Dr. Fenster's tenure as a Clinician-Scientist of the American Heart Association. Dallas, Texas. It was supported by a Grant-In-Aid from the American Heart Association, Arizona Affiliate, Phoenix, Arizona. This study was presented in part at the 33rd Annual Scientific Session of the American College of Cardiology, Dallas, Texas, March 1984. Manuscript received May 22, 1984; revised manuscript received July 16. 1984, accepted July 31, 1984. Address for reprints: Paul E. Fenster, MD, Cardiology Section. University Hospital, Tucson, Arizona 85724. 1985 by the American College of Cardiology ical histories, normal findings on physical examination, normal hemoglobin concentration andnormal thyroid, liver and renal chemistry values. Thyroid studies included measurement of total thyroxine, free thyroxine index, triiodothyronine resin uptake, free triiodothyronine and reverse triiodothyronine. No subject was taking any medication at the time of enrollment in the study. Protocol. In each subject, the pharmacokinetic behavior of digoxin after a single 1.0 mg intravenous dose was determined twice. First, digoxin was administered alone; the second digoxin dose was given after 3 weeks of oral amiodarohe. Digoxin (Lanoxin) was given as an intravenous infusioh into an arm vein over 10 minutes. Blood samples were drawn from the contralateral arm at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes and at 2, 3. 4, 6, 8, 24, 32, 48, 56, 72, 80, 96, 104 and 120 hours after the dose. Serum was separated and stored frozen at - 20 DC until assayed. Complete 24 hour urine collections were obtained daily for 5 days after the dose. Urine volumes were measured, and an aliquot was stored frozen until assayed. Subjects were then given oral amiodarone (Cordarone, Labaz), 400 mg daily. After 21 to 25 days of amiodarone administration, the 1.0 mg intravenous digoxin dose was repeated, and blood and urine samples were collected according to the same schedule as after the first digoxin dose. Amiodarone was continued for 5 days after this digoxin dose. Amiodarone is known to produce hyper- or hypothyroidism. Alterations in thyroid function affect digoxin pharmacokinetics. Therefore, during the fourth week of amio- 0735-1097/85/$3.30

FENSTERET AL. 109 darone administration. additional bloodsamples wereobtained for measurement of free triiodothyronine, reverse triiodothyronine, total thyroxine and free thyroxine index. Analytical methods. Digoxin serum and urine concentrations were determined in all samples by radioimmunoassay with a solid phase technique (Clinical Assay. Travenol). The coefficient of variation for this assay was 5.2% at 0,75 ng/ml, 4.7% at 1.4 ng/ml and 4,5% at 3.8 ng/m\. With this assay. serum concentrations of digoxin were reliably measured to a minimum of 0,15 ng/m\. Serum samples from each subjectcontaining amiodarone but no digoxin were assayed for digoxin, In no case did the assay falsely detect digoxin in these samples. Total thyroxine determinations were performed by a competitive binding radioimmunoassay method (GAMMA COAT, Clinical Assays, Cambridge). Triiodothyronine resin uptake was measured by the inorganic adsorbent method (TRITAB. Nuclear Medical Laboratories). Free thyroxine index is a mathematical calculation, which is the product of total thyroxine and triiodothyronine resin uptake divided by the mean normal triiodothyronineresin uptake. Free triiodothyronine determinations were made by dialysis, utilizing incubation at 37 for 16 to 18 hours. and subsequent measurement by radioimmunoassay (Nichols Institute). Reverse triiodothyronine was measured by the PEG method utilizing radioimmunoassay technique and competitive inhibition with antibody produced in rabbits (Serono Laboratories. Inc.). Serum and urine samples were assayedfor creatinine by a modification of the Technicon Autoanalyzer adaptation of the method of Folin and Wu (6). Data analysis. For each digoxin injection in each subject, digoxin serum concentration versus time data were individually fit to a multiexponential equation by means of a nonlinear regression computer program. All data were fit to two or three exponential terms, The most appropriate equation was determined using a statistical test of significance (7), The pharmacokinetic variables of half-life, systemic clearance. apparent volume of distribution and area under the serum concentration versus time curve were calculated from the coefficients and exponents of the fitted curves using standard methods (8), Renal clearance of digoxin was calculated by dividing the amount eliminated in the urine during the 5 days after intravenous injection by the area under the curve for the same period, Digoxin nonrenal clearance was calculated as the difference between systemic clearance and renal clearance. Creatinine clearances were calculated by dividing the amount eliminated in the urine in 24 hours by the serum concentration at the midpoint of the collection period, Statistical methods. Statistical comparisons of the pharmacokinetic variables of digoxin in the absence and presence of amiodarone were made using Student's paired t test. Results Digoxin pharmacokinetics after amiodarone. Table I summarizes the pharmacokinetic values obtained in each subject after each digoxin injection, Figure 1 shows the time course of digoxin serum concentrations after intravenous administration alone, and then with concurrent oral amiodarone administration in one subject. In the presence of amiodarone, systemic clearance of digoxin in the 10subjects was reduced 26%, from 234 ± 72 milmin (mean ± standard deviation) to 172 ± 33 mllmin (p < 0.01). Only two subjects (Cases 8 and 10) failed to show a substantial reduction in digoxin systemic clearance, After the addition of amiodarone, digoxin renal clearance was reduced 20%, from Table 1. Pharmacokinetic Variables for Digoxin Alone and in the Presence of Amiodarone in 10 Normal Subjects Systemic Clearance (ml/min l Renal Clearance (ml/rnin) Nonrenal Clearance (rnl/minl Volume of Distribution (liters/kg) Elimination Half-Life (hours) Case D D+A D D+A D D+A D D+A D D+A 256 189 118 93 138 96 7.1 8.8 21 36 2 374 206 193 106 181 100 10.4 6.6 21 24 3 253 128 114 59 139 69 12.4 7.1 38 44 4 241 200 99 91 142 109 7.1 5.5 23 22 5 322 211 127 92 195 119 9.0 6.8 22 25 6 213 191 96 96 1\7 95 15.6 18.7 58 77 7 189 149 61 71 128 78 9.9 9.4 39 47 8 137 137 55 71 82 66 6.2 5.9 35 33 9 190 126 101 70 89 56 12.0 7.4 51 47 10 167 181 81 88 86 93 7.5 9.4 35 41 Mean 234 172 105 84 130 88 9.7 8.6 34 40 ±SD 72 33 39 15 38 20 3.0 3.8 13 16 P <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 NS <0.05 D = digoxin alone; D + A = digoxin with concurrent amiodarone.

110 FENSTER ET AL. Figure 1. Semilogarithmic plot of the serum concentration of digoxin as a function of time after the intravenous administration of digoxin alone (.) and during concurrent amiodarone treatment (0) in one subject. - E -C).s co ~ c ~ c 8 E ~ c ' C) is 30.0 20.0 10.0 5.0 2.0 1.0 0.5 0.2 0Q" - 0-_ 0 ----..Q..... Q... --. Digoxin alone o - - 0 Digoxin + amiodarone - -...0-0-_ -0- ---.P 0.1+---,----r--r---,...----.---r--r---.---r--r---r-..., 105 ± 39 to 84 ± 15 ml/min (p < 0.05). In four of the subjects, however, there was either no change or a slight increase in digoxin renal clearance. Amiodarone produced a 32% reduction in digoxin nonrenal clearance, from 130 ± 38 to 88 ± 20 mllmin (p < 0.01). The reduction in digoxin nonrenal clearance was observed in 9 of the 10 subjects. Digoxin elimination half-life was prolonged after amiodarone in seven subjects. For the whole group, the prolongation from 34 to 40 hours was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The mean digoxin volume of distribution was not significantly altered by amiodarone administration. Creatinine clearance was measured on the first and fifth days after each digoxin dose. There was no significant change in creatinine clearance either within or between treatment periods. For the group, the mean creatinine clearance was 112 ± 19 mllmin after the first digoxin dose and 113 ± 18 mllmin after the second digoxin dose. Thyroid function after amiodarone. Table 2 summarizes the thyroid function data obtained in each subject before and after 3 weeks of amiodarone therapy. Despite the low dose of amiodarone, each subject had a substantial increase in serum reverse triiodothyronine levels. The serum Table 2. Thyroid Function Before and After 3 Weeks of Amiodarone in 10 Normal Subjects Reverse Free Triiodothy- Triiodothy- Total Free ronine* roninet Thyroxinej Thyroxine (pg/ml) (pg/dl) (ll-g%l100 ml) Index Case C A C A C A C A I 244 638 339 194 8.6 5.3 8.0 7.4 2 85 246 292 226 7.0 7.7 7.1 8.1 3 127 532 317 239 8.3 8.0 9.6 8.6 4 159 459 275 222 6.6 7.4 8.0 8.3 5 100 573 270 193 5.7 6.5 6.4 9.5 6 125 429 271 241 8.0 8.6 7.8 7.8 7 102 417 246 195 7.2 7.6 8.2 6.9 8 99 392 274 159 7.0 6.8 9.0 6.8 9 227 711 238 293 7.8 6.7 8.6 7.4 10 121 561 346 294 8.9 7.4 8.3 9.3 Mean 139 496 287 226 7.5 7.2 8.1 8.0 ±SD 55 135 37 44 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 P <0.001 <0.001 NS NS *Normal range 80 to 350 pg/ml; t normal range 230 to 660 pg/dl; :j:normal range 4.5 to 11.5 Il-g%/IOO ml; normal range 3.75 to 13.4. A = after3 weeks of amiodarone; C = control, before amiodarone.

JACC Vol. 5. No. I January 1 9~ 5 : 1U8-12 FENSTER ET AL. DIGOXIN AMIODARONE INTERACTION 111 concentration of free triiodothyronine decreased in eight subjects, and fell below normal values in six of these eight. We found no consistent changes in total thyroxine or free thyroxine index. No subject developed any clinical manifestation of abnormal thyroid function. No subject experienced any significant adverse reaction to either digoxin or amiodarone. Discussion Previous study. Several reports document a rise in serum digoxin concentration when amiodarone is added to longterm oral digoxin therapy. Moysey et al. (I) noted an average increase of 69% in plasma digoxin concentrations when amiodarone, 600 mg daily, was added to long-term digoxin treatment in seven patients. Four patients developed symptoms compatible with digoxin toxicity. In two additional patients, plasma digoxin concentrations increased after maintenance amiodarone was increased from 200 to 600 mg daily. Furlanello et al. (2) found a linear correlation between plasma amiodarone levels and plasma digoxin or beta methyldigoxin levels in 33 patients on long-term treatment with both drugs. None of their patients developed toxic plasma digoxin levels or signs of digitalis toxicity. Nademanee et al. (3) found that amiodarone, 600 to 1,800 mg daily for at least 2 weeks, increased plasma digoxin levels in all 20 patients studied on long-term treatment with both drug s. During combination treatment, two patients developed sinus arrest, seven had gastrointestinal side effects and five had neurotoxicity. Similarly, Oetgen et al. (4) reported an increase in serum digoxin levels in 22 patients, from 1.0 ± 0.4 ng/ml before amiodarone to 1.9 ± 0.8 ng/ml after 7 weeks on amiodarone. In contrast, Achilli er al. (5) found no effect of amiodaronc, 200 mg twice daily, on digoxin serum concentrations in five patients treated with this combination. Pharmacokinetic basis ofinteraction. We have investigated the pharmacokinetic basis of this interaction. Arniodarone raises serum digoxin levels by reducing digoxin systemic clearance. This is due to reduction in both the renal and nonrenal clearances of digoxin. Digoxin volume of distribution is essentially unchanged. The observed prolongation of digoxin elimination half-life is the necessary consequence of the reduction in digoxin systemic clearance in the absence of a change in volume of distribution. In the absence of changes in bioavailability and volume of distribution, a 26% reduction in clearance should produce approximately a 33% increa se in mean steady state digoxin levels. Previou s investigators (1,3,4) reported even greater percent increases in digoxin trough levels after the addition of amiodarone. This may indicate that the magnitude of the interaction is dependent on the dose or serum concentration of amiodarone. In the reports of Nademanee and Moyscy and their coworkers (1,3), the daily dose of amiodarone was at least 600 mg, compared with 400 mg in this study. Furthermore, these clinical reports are based on findings in patients receiving long-term oral digoxin therapy. The effects of amiodarone on digoxin pharmacokinetics may be enhanced in patients with reduced cardiac output or impaired renal funct ion compared with normal volunteers. It is also possible that amiodarone increases the absorption of orally administered digoxin. We observed considerable interindividual variation in the magnitude of the amiodarone effect on digoxin pharmacokinetics. This could possibly be due to the interindividual variability in amiodarone pharmacokinetic s, but we do not have amiodarone serum levels available for comparison in our subjects. The digoxin-amiodarone interaction is complex. The decrease in digoxin renal clearance is not due to a change in glomerular filtration rate, since creatinine clearance did not change. However, digoxin is also eliminated by tubular secretion (9), and amiodarone, like quinidine (10) and spironolactone (9), may affect this process. Amiodarone also reduce s digoxin nonrenal clearance. This probably indicates a decrease in digoxin excretion or biotransformation in either the liver or the gut. Role of changes in thyroid function. Any of these effects of amiodarone may be due to a direct action of the drug or may be mediated in part by an alteration in thyroid function. Digoxin metabolism and elimination are altered in clinical hypo- and hyperthyroidism (11). Amiodarone inhibits peripheral deiodination of thyroxine to triiodothyronine, resulting in increa sed production of reverse triiodoth yronine. The changes in thyroid chemistry values observed in our subjects are in agreement with those reported by Burger et al. (12) in normal volunteers receiving the same dose of amiodarone. Although we found substantial increases in reverse triiodothyronine levels and decreases in free triiodothyronine levels with amiodarone, no patient had any clinic al manifestation of altered thyroid function. We found no consistent relation between the magnitude of change in rever se triiodothyronine level. or any other variable of thyroid function, and the magnitude of change in any of the pharmacokinetic variables. The antiarrhythmic and electrophysiologic effects of amiodarone have been predicted from reverse triiodothyronine levels (13). The effect of amiodarone on digoxin pharmacokinetics does not appear to be quantitatively related to changes in thyroid chemistry values. Conclusions. Amiodarone reduce s digoxin renal and nonrenal clearances and prolongs digoxin elimination halflife. The clinical consequences of this interaction are not fully defined at present. However, to reduce the risk of digitalis toxicity. we recommend that serum digoxin levels be monitored after initiation of amiodarone therapy. Our data indicate that to maintain a stable serum digoxin concentration, the dose of digoxin should be decreased by approximately one-fourth after initiating amiodarone.

112 FENSTER ET AL. January 1985: 108-12 References 1. Moysey 10, Jaggarao NSV, Grundy EN, Chamberlain DA. Amiodarone increasesplasmadigoxin concentrations. Br MooJ 198I;282:272. 2. FurlaneIlo F, Inama G, Ferrari M, et ai. Another type of interaction between blood levels of digitalis and anti-arrhythmic drugs: digoxin and amiodarone. G Ital Cardiol 1981;11:1725-8. 3. Nademanee K, Kannan R, Hendrickson J, Ookhtens M, Kay I, Singh B. Amiodarone-digoxin interaction: clinical significance, time course of development, potential pharmacokinetic mechanisms and therapeutic implications. J Am CoIl CardioI1984;4:1I1-6. 4. Oetgen WJ, Sobol SM, Tri TB, Heydom WH, Davia JE, Rakita L. Amiodarone-digoxin interaction: clinical and experimental observations (abstr). Circulation 1982;66(suppl 11):11-382. 5. AchilIi A, Giacci M, Capezzuto A, DeLuca F, Guerra R, Serra N. Digoxin-quinidine and digoxin-amiodarone interactions. Effects on bloodlevelsof the cardioactiveglycoside. G Ita!Card1011981;11:918-25. 6. Folin 0, Wu H. A system of blood analysis. J BioI Chem 1919;38:81-110. 7. Boxenbaum HG, Riegelman S, Elashoff RM. Statistical estimations in pharmacokinetics. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1974;2:123-48. 8. Gibaldi M, Perrier D. Pharmacokinetics. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1975:45-96. 9. Steiness E. Renal tubular secretion of digoxin. Circulation 1974;50:103-7. 10. Hager WD, Fenster P, Mayersohn M, et ai. Digoxin-quinidine interaction: pharmacokinetic evaluation. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1238-41. II. Doherty JE, Perkins WHo Digoxin metabolism in hypo- and hyperthyroidism: studies with tritiated digoxin in thyroid disease. Ann Intern Med 1966;64:489-507. 12. Burger A, Dinichert P, Nicod P, Jenny M, Lemarchand-Beraud T, Vallotton MB. Effect of amiodarone on serum triiodothyronine, reverse triiodothyronine, thyroxin, and thyrotropin. J Clin Invest 1976;58:255-9. 13. Nademanee K, Singh B, Hendrickson JA, Reed AW, Melmed S, Hershman J. Pharmacokinetic significance of serum reverse triiodothyronine levels during amiodarone treatment: a potential method for monitoring chronic drug therapy. Circulation 1982;66:202-11.