Lymphadenectomy in Invasive Bladder Cancer: Knowns and Unknowns Seth P. Lerner, MD, FACS Professor of Urology Beth and Dave Swalm Chair in Urologic

Similar documents
Open Radical Cystectomy Tips and Tricks in Males and Females

Lymph node dissection: how much is enough?

The Rationale for Immunotherapy as an Adjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced BC

Should the primary be treated in patients with metastatic disease? Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer

Ode to a node Lymph node dissec3on in prostate and bladder cancer

Neoadjuvant vs. Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Lymph Node Positive Bladder Cancer Treated With Radical Cystectomy and Lymphadenectomy: Effect of the Level of Node Positivity

Early radical cystectomy in NMIBC Marko Babjuk

346

BCG Unresponsive Disease A Roadmap for Drug Development and Integra;on of Novel Therapies

Presentation with lymphadenopathy

Invasive Bladder Transitional Cell Carcinoma OBJECTIVES

Lymphadenectomy in RCC: Yes, No, Clinical Trial?

Role and extension of lymph node dissection in kidney, bladder and prostate cancer. Omar Ghanem (PGY3 ) Moderator: Dr A. Noujem 30 th March 2017

Management of High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Seth P. Lerner, MD, FACS

When to Integrate Surgery for Metatstatic Urothelial Cancers

Presentation with lymphadenopathy

Disclosures. The Importance of Pathology? Pathologic, Morphologic and Clinical Features. Pathologic Reproducibility

Alicia K. Morgans, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Hematology/Oncology Vanderbilt University Medical Center January 24, 2015

Optimal sequencing in treatment muscle invasive bladder cancer : oncologists. Phichai Chansriwong, MD Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Lymphadenectomy with Cystectomy: Is It Necessary

Radical Prostatectomy: Management of the Primary From Localized to Oligometasta:c Disease

UROTHELIAL CELL CANCER

Radical Cystectomy in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer: Oncological Outcome and Survival Predictors

EUROPEAN UROLOGY 60 (2011)

The Role of Surgery in Metastatic Bladder Cancer. Maurizio Brausi Chairman ESOU Modena, ITALY

Radical Cystectomy for Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Without Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Therapy: Long-Term Results in 1100 Patients

Extent of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Cystectomy: Is Bigger Better?

A Fourteen-Year Review of Radical Cystectomy for Transitional Cell Carcinoma Demonstrating the Usefulness of the Concept of Lymph Node Density

Highlighting Clinical Trials Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Conclusions. Keywords

Why Do Axillary Dissection? Nodal Treatment and Survival NSABP B04. Revisiting Axillary Dissection for SN Positive Patients

Does skip metastasis or other lymph node parameters have additional effects on survival of patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer?

Implications of ACOSOG Z11 for Clinical Practice: Surgical Perspective

Debate: Adjuvant vs. Neoadjuvant Therapy for Urothelial Cancer

BJUI. 35% had lymph node involvement at radical cystectomy or subsequent recurrence within the dissection template.

Implications of ACOSOG Z11 for Clinical Practice: Surgical Perspective

RCC in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs): Diagnosis and Management

Bladder Sparing Treatment of Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

The Role of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer

MUSCLE - INVASIVE AND METASTATIC BLADDER CANCER

The Depth of Tumor Invasion is Superior to 8 th AJCC/UICC Staging System to Predict Patients Outcome in Radical Cystectomy.

The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Dissection

Surgical Issues in Melanoma

M D..,., M. M P.. P H., H, F. F A.. A C..S..

Sang Eun Lee, Hakmin Lee, Hyun Hwan Sung, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee, Han-Yong Choi, Byong Chang Jeong

Determining the Optimal Surgical Approach to Esophageal Cancer

Debate: Whole pelvic RT for high risk prostate cancer??

Collection of Recorded Radiotherapy Seminars

Does the Extent of Lymphadenectomy in Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer Influence Disease-Free Survival? A Prospective Single-Center Study

Management of high risk early cervical cancer - a view of surgeon Dan DY Kim, M.D., Ph.D.

Index. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 14 (2005) Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with pt0 Bladder Cancer after Radical Cystectomy: A Single-institute Experience

Oncotype DX testing in node-positive disease

The Royal Marsden. Surgery for Gastric and GE Junction Cancer: primary palliative when and where? William Allum Consultant Surgeon

Surgeons Perspective: LN as a Draining Pattern. Jose A. Karam, MD, FACS Associate Professor Department of Urology

Muscle Invasive Urothelial Cancer April 2018 Ralph de Vere White, M.D. Emeritus Director, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center Associate Dean for

Ureteroscopy Is Indicated in every patient with suspected Upper Tract Urothelial Tumor

The Predictors of Local Recurrence after Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Invasive Bladder Cancer

Radical Cystectomy Often Too Late? Yes, But...

Melanoma Patients and the Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Procedure: An Oncologic Surgeon s Perspective

Alberto Briganti, M.D., PhD

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on patients with pathological Stage T3b and/or lymph node metastatic bladder cancer after radical cystectomy

Review Article Lymphadenectomy in Management of Invasive Bladder Cancer

Translating Evidence into Practice: Primary Cutaneous Melanoma Guidelines. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Nodal staging and lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical cystectomy

ESGO-ESTRO-ESP Cervical Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines Management of early stages: algorithms focusing on the histological data

BC G Unresponsive Non- Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

editoriale Optimal lymph node dissection for T3-T4 lower rectal cancer, the so-called high risk group: the Japanese experience Introduction

Immunotherapy in the Adjuvant Setting for Melanoma: What You Need to Know

Results of the ACOSOG Z0011 Trial

Paul F. Schellhammer, M.D. Eastern Virginia Medical School Urology of Virginia Norfolk, Virginia

SLN Mapping in Cervical Cancer. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, USA

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Other Tumours: Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Other Tumours. Methodology. Results. Key Questions to Consider

MUSCLE-INVASIVE AND METASTATIC BLADDER CANCER

Radiotherapy Implications of ACOSOG Z-11 for Clinical Practice. Julia White, MD Professor of Radiation Oncology Medical College of Wisconsin

GUIDELINES ON PROSTATE CANCER

Current Experience with Intrapelvic/Intraureteral Irrigation/Ablative Therapy

Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup Cervix Cancer Research Network. The SHAPE Trial

Management of Vulvar Cancer: How to Handle Close Margins?

Is Hepatic Resection Needed in the Patients with Peritoneal Side T2 Gallbladder Cancer?

Clinical Outcome of Reconstruction With Tissue Expanders for Patients With Breast Cancer and Mastectomy

Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder Histopathology

Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Primary and Recurrent TCC 4/10/2010. Two major consequences: Strategies: High-Risk NMI TCC

GUIDELINES ON NON-MUSCLE- INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER

COLON AND RECTAL CANCER

How much colon should be resected?

Trimodality Therapy for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Adjuvant and Salvage Radiation for Prostate Cancer. Savita Dandapani, MD, PhD

Laparoscopic Surgery. The Da Vinci Robot. Limits of Laparoscopy. What Robotics Offers. Robotic Urologic Surgery: A New Era in Patient Care

Mini J.Elnaggar M.D. Radiation Oncology Ochsner Medical Center 9/23/2016. Background

Minimal Invasive Approach ro radical cystectomy: Results of the European multicentric study

Update on SLN and Melanoma: DECOG and MSLT-II. Gordon H. Hafner, MD, FACS

Approaches to Surgical Treatment of Gastric Cancer. Byrne Lee, MD FACS Chief, Mixed Tumor Surgery Service

Urinary Bladder Cancer

Development and external validation of nomograms predicting disease-free and cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy

Staging and Grading Last Updated Friday, 14 November 2008

Advances in gastric cancer: How to approach localised disease?

L approccio alle stazioni linfonodali in presentazione di malattia ed all eventuale recidiva nodale: il punto di vista dell urologo

Transcription:

Lymphadenectomy in Invasive Bladder Cancer: Knowns and Unknowns Seth P. Lerner, MD, FACS Professor of Urology Beth and Dave Swalm Chair in Urologic Oncology Scott Department of Urology Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Disclosures Clinical trials Endo, FKD, JBL (SWOG), Roche/Genentech (SWOG), Urogen, Viventia Consultant Archiano Therapeutics, UroGen, Vaxiion Advisory Board mir Scientific, QED Therapeutics, UroGen MSD Korea, Dava Oncology speaker honoraria

Learning Objectives To describe the anatomy of and stage specific association of lymph node metastasis To describe the evidence supporting the anatomic extent of bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy To understand status of current Phase III clinical trials of extended vs. standard PLND

TNM Staging Invasive Cancer (AJCC 8 th Edition 2018) Pelvic Node Staging N1 single node in true pelvis includes perivesical N2 multiple nodes in true pelvis True pelvis includes external and internal iliac, obturator and presacral nodes N3 lymph node metastasis in common iliac nodes >12 nodes for adequate staging N1,N2 N3 N3 N1,N2

AJCC Revisions Paner, et al Eur Urol 73:560, 2018

Disease-Specific Survival According to pn Stage at Cystectomy Probability of event-free survival 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 N3 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 132 144 156 168 180 192 N1 N2 Time since cystectomy (months) N0 True pelvis N1 single node 2cm N2 single node >2 5cm; Mult nodes none >5cm N3 node > 5cm Common iliac or above M1 6

Vazina, et al J Urol 171:1830, 2004

Prospective LN Mapping 290 patients eplnd in all Prospective mapping IMA 6 centers Unilateral tumor Crossover common Positive nodes common in extended template Leissner, et al J Urol 171;139, 2004

Lymph Node Drainage of the Bladder Extended PLND resected 92% of all primary lymphatic landing sites; Standard PLND resected 81% Roth, et al Eur Urol 57:205, 2010

Rationale for Extended PLND Standard LND includes external/internal iliac and obturator lymph nodes Identifies 95% of N1; skip metastases rare Extended LND includes presacral, CI and distal aorta/ivc nodes increases node yield by 34-40% 36-43% of P3,P4N+ have node metastasis above CI bifurcation 10

Post-cystectomy survival Re-analysis of SWOG 8710 Chemotherapy Surgical margins was status more and likely number to of beneficial nodes value removed if patients were independently received a highquality associated surgery with by an local experienced pelvic recurrence surgeon Herr, HW et al, J Clin Oncol; 22:2781 2004

Abdollah, et al BJUI 109:1147, 2011 The Cost of Omitting a PLND SEER 17 1988-2006 Ca-specific mortality Overall mortality

Christodouleas JP, et al Cancer 2014 LND and Local Control

Does a More Extensive LND Improve Survival? SEER 1988-1996 1 1923 patients Improved survival with high number of nodes especially for patients with Stage III and IV SEER17 (1988-2003) 2 1260 pts node pos More LN removed associated with lower mortality 1 Konety et al J Urol 169:946, 2003 2 Wright, et al Cancer 11:2401, 2008

What is the Surgical Standard for Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and Radical Cystectomy? YES? Roth, et al Eur urol 57:205, 2010 15

Extent of LND and Survival Pancreatic Head Cancer (Surgery 138:618, 2005) Early closure after interim analysis showed increased morbidity and decreased survival with extended LND Esophogeal Cancer (Ann Surg 246:992, 2007) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection - No survival benefit 16

Extent of LND and Survival Esophogeal Cancer (JAMA Surg 151:32, 2016) Extent of lymphadenectomy did not influence 5-year all-cause or disease-specific survival Gastric Cancer (NEJM 359:453, 2008) No difference in RFS and OS Non-significant increase in morbidity w/extended LND No Level I Evidence Supporting Extended LND 17

Technical University of Munich Limited versus extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: survival results from a prospective, randomized trial (LEA - AUO AB 25/02, NCT01215071) Jürgen E Gschwend, Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich, Germany MM Heck, J Lehmann, H Rübben, P Albers, A Heidenreich, P de Geeter, JM Wolff, D Frohneberg, T Schnöller, T Kälble, M Stöckle, A Stenzl, M Müller, U-B Liehr, M Truss, S Roth, J Leissner and M Retz on behalf of the Association of Urologic Oncology (AUO), German Cancer Society Presented by: Jürgen E. Gschwend

LEA - AUO AB 25/02, NCT01215071

Gschwend, et al Eur Urol epub 10/15/18 LEA - AUO AB 25/02, NCT01215071

LEA Trial Conclusions Negative trial for primary endpoint RFS in control arm 62% better than assumption of 50% Included T1 Standard LND was limited no dissection below obturator nerve No neoadjuvant chemotherapy Post-hoc unplanned analysis T2 possible benefit Lerner, Svatek Eur Urol epub 1/4/19

Schema SWOG S-1011 T2-T4a Urothelial ca Radical Cystectomy Neoadjuvant Ctx allowed R A N D O M I Z E Standard PLND External/internal iliac, obturator nodes Extended LND Standard + CI, pre sacral, distal IVC and aorta pt3-4n0, ptanyn+ Adjuvant Chemotherapy Powered to detect 10% improvement in 3 yr DFS from 55-65%

Sample Size Based on PFS Sample size of 564 patients (282 per arm) Total planned accrual 620 (10% drop out) 85% power to detect a 28% reduction in the hazard rate of progression or death (HR 0.72) Status: Opened August, 2011 Accural: 659 reg; 620 randomized Completed February 2017

Comparison LEA and SWOG LEA S-1011 Eligibility T1-T4a T2-T4a Neoadjuvant chemo Not allowed Allowed (56%) Planned randomized 400 564 Registered (n) 438 659 Randomized (n) 433 620 Drop out/ineligible 71 (16.4%) Assume 10% ineligible ITT 362 Estimate 576 LND control arm Limited Standard eplnd IMA Aorta bifurcation IMA Primary endpoint RFS at 5 years PFS at 3 years Effect size 15% (50 65%) 10% improvement (55 65%) Power 90% 85% Hazard ratio 0.80 (final result) 0.72

Summary AUA Guidelines (2016): Radical cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for surgically curable nonmetastatic (M0) disease External and internal iliac and obturator nodes A thorough PLND contributes significantly to local control Extending the proximal limits of PLND increases the number of nodes identified and maximizes sensitivity for detection of node metastases Randomized trials of extended vs. standard PLND are required to demonstrate improved progression free and overall survival