April 23, Roger Dynamic SoundField & Roger Focus. Can You Decipher This? The challenges of understanding

Similar documents
Roger TM Plug in, turn on and teach. Dynamic SoundField

Roger Dynamic SoundField A new era in classroom amplification

Roger TM. Learning without limits. SoundField for education

Roger TM. for Education Bridging the understanding gap

Roger Dynamic SoundField. A new era in classroom amplification

A new era in classroom amplification

June AudioLounge. Helping adults (& teenagers) hear better in noise

Radio Aid Systems. 14 School &

A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification

Roger TM at work. Focus on work rather than on hearing

Flying to the Moon on Radio Waves: Optimizing Outcomes with RF Technologies. Jace Wolfe, Ph.D., CCC-A

For hearing instruments. 25/04/2015 Assistive Listening Devices - Leuven

1/29/2016. FM: It s Not Just For Kids. Agenda. Introduction Why FM and What Is It? Solution Approach Research Current Products

Roger at work. Bridging the understanding gap

solutions to keep kids and teens connected Guide for Roger TM Life is on Bridging the understanding gap

Phonak Wireless Communication Portfolio Product information

Slide 38. Slide 39. Slide 40. Connectivity. Connectivity. Natural Connectivity with the T-Mic 2. What you will learn today

Phonak Wireless Communication Portfolio Product information

HAT Process: Determining HAT for a Student

FM SYSTEMS. with the FONIX 6500-CX Hearing Aid Analyzer. (Requires software version 4.20 or above) FRYE ELECTRONICS, INC.

Evaluation of Speech Recognition with Personal FM and Classroom Audio Distribution Systems

Lindsay De Souza M.Cl.Sc AUD Candidate University of Western Ontario: School of Communication Sciences and Disorders

Hear Better With FM. Get more from everyday situations. Life is on

Phonak Wireless Communication Portfolio Product information

Personal Listening Solutions. Featuring... Digisystem.

An innovative and cost effective approach to wireless remote microphones in schools

Testing FM Systems on the 7000 Hearing Aid Test System

Wireless Technology - Improving Signal to Noise Ratio for Children in Challenging Situations

Connevans.info. DeafEquipment.co.uk. This product may be purchased from Connevans Limited secure online store at

The effect of wearing conventional and level-dependent hearing protectors on speech production in noise and quiet

Roger TM in challenging listening situations. Hear better in noise and over distance

Carefree connectivity

Carefree connectivity

Tune in on life with SCOLAbuddy. A new fm receiver from Widex

Classroom acoustics for vocal health of elementary school teachers

Phonak Naida TM V70 The power solution of choice

CLASSROOM AMPLIFICATION: WHO CARES? AND WHY SHOULD WE? James Blair and Jeffery Larsen Utah State University ASHA, San Diego, 2011

FM for Cochlear Implants Chapter 13. Effects of Accessory-Mixing Ratio on Performance with Personal FM and Cochlear Implants

Phonak pediatric solutions. Because a child is not a small adult

Power hearing solutions Access to more of life s conversations

Speaker s Notes: AB is dedicated to helping people with hearing loss hear their best. Partnering with Phonak has allowed AB to offer unique

Amigo Star. Insert photos matching the introduction paragraph of the literature review

Assistive Listening Technology: in the workplace and on campus

Solutions for better hearing. audifon innovative, creative, inspired

Erin C. Schafer 1 Maggie Hill 1. University of North Texas Departments of Speech and Hearing Sciences 1 & Department Educational Psychology 2

Phonak pediatric solutions Because a child is not a small adult

Phonak pediatric solutions

Speaker s Notes: AB is dedicated to helping people with hearing loss hear their best. Partnering with Phonak has allowed AB to offer unique

Section 5 - The use of personal FM systems with soundfield systems

Topics in Amplification CONNECTIVITY COMMUNICATION WITHOUT LIMITS

The first choice for design and function.

WIDEXPRESS. no.30. Background

Providing Effective Communication Access

Automatic and directional for kids Scientific background and implementation of pediatric optimized automatic functions

When dedicated power hearing technology brings you closer, life is on. Phonak Naída TM

Cochlear True Wireless Accessories Experience True Wireless Freedom

CROS System Initial Fit Protocol

ELECTROACOUSTIC EVALUATION OF THE RESOUND UNITE MINI MICROPHONE WITH OTOMETRICS AURICAL HIT

Presenter. Community Outreach Specialist Center for Sight & Hearing

Everything you need to stay connected

Best Practice Protocols

Phonak Fast Facts. Audéo B-Direct

ELECTROACOUSTIC EVALUATION OF THE RESOUND MULTI MIC WITH OTOMETRICS AURICAL HIT

Can You Hear Me Now?

Accessing the "Far World": A New Age of Connectivity for Hearing Aids by George Lindley, PhD, AuD

Serving the Student with Cochlear Implants and Hearing Assistance Technologies (HAT)

Testing FM Systems with FONIX FP40 Analyzers

Muse Wireless CROS System

When dedicated power hearing technology brings you closer, life is on. Phonak Naída B

What you need to know about student s hearing technology for classroom listening. Why DO students with hearing loss need classroom hearing technology?

Listen Only. Dual. CutOff. FM Radio. New! Dual Pro. FM Radio CutOff Listen Only. the complete hearing protector

When dedicated power hearing technology brings you closer, life is on. Phonak Naída TM

Auditory Processing. Teach Inclusive Chapter 4, March Catherine Silcock, Speech Pathologist

Expanded Cochlear Implant Candidacy Guidelines and Technology Advances

MedRx HLS Plus. An Instructional Guide to operating the Hearing Loss Simulator and Master Hearing Aid. Hearing Loss Simulator

BRING ON BINAURAL VOICESTREAM TECHNOLOGY The Best Technology for Hearing with Both Ears

Hear better at work. Life is on.

Carol De Filippo. Viet Nam Teacher Education Institute June 2010

Op#mizing Hearing Performance with a Wireless Remote Microphone Audio Streaming Accessory

International Bureau for Audiophonology

Product Model #:ASTRO Digital Spectra Consolette W7 Models (Local Control)

Special Services. Deaf & Hard of Hearing. Presentation for SEAC March 20, 2013

Evaluation of Speech Recognition in Noise with Cochlear Implants and Dynamic FM DOI: /jaaa

Amigo FM made easy - inside and. outside the classroom

HOW TO USE THE SHURE MXA910 CEILING ARRAY MICROPHONE FOR VOICE LIFT

How to use mycontrol App 2.0. Rebecca Herbig, AuD

Frequently asked questions to Oticon ConnectClip

The Benefits and Challenges of Amplification in Classrooms.

Implants. Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Presentation Tips. Becoming Familiar with Cochlear. Implants

Marvel technology by Phonak

Phonak Naída TM. Product information

Connevans.info. DeafEquipment.co.uk. This product may be purchased from Connevans Limited secure online store at

HEARING LOSS TECHNOLOGY

NAIP philosophy and approach to the effective use, set up and evaluation of personal radio systems with cochlear implants.

Validation Studies. How well does this work??? Speech perception (e.g., Erber & Witt 1977) Early Development... History of the DSL Method

DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY IN THE CLASSROOM. Deakin University CRICOS Provider Code: 00113B

EHDI in Michigan. Introduction. EHDI Goals and Communication Options. Review of EHDI Goals. Effects of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS)

Date: April 19, 2017 Name of Product: Cisco Spark Board Contact for more information:

Roger for young children. When your child can hear more words, life is on

Transcription:

Roger Dynamic SoundField & Roger Focus Lindsay Roberts, Au.D. Pediatric and School Specialist PA, WV, OH, IN, MI, KY & TN Can You Decipher This? The challenges of understanding Meaningful education requires that children can hear their teachers well Children with hearing loss face challenges in classrooms, which can be very noisy Extensive studies* have shown that hearing instruments alone are often not enough and that intelligent solutions are needed FM has been the typical solution *Proceedings ACCESS (2003) & Proceedings ACCESS 2 (2008) 1

A history of firsts for the classroom 2013 2007 The first to use adaptive digital wirelesstransmissionat 2.4 GHz 2003 Dynamic FM The first adaptive FM system 2000 Multi-frequency FM The first frequency-flexible FM system MLx The first universal ear-level FM receiver 1996 MicroLink The first miniaturized ear-level FM receiver Have You Met Roger? Bridging the understanding gap with Roger Roger is the new digital standard that uses 2.4 GHz technology. It bridges the understanding gap, in noise and over distance, by wirelessly transmitting the speaker s voice directly to the listener. 2

Why the name Roger? Roger comes from aviation It means message received and understood What is Roger? Roger is a new digital wireless technology standard that replaces FM Allows for low delay and reliable long-range broadcast to miniature, low-power receivers Operates on 2.4 GHz band (ISM), with intelligent adaptive protocols Audio bandwidth up to 7300 Hz Privacy is guaranteed Roger Dynamic SoundField Classroom noise is not only a problem for students with hearing difficulties. It can also make understanding the teacher difficult for children with normal hearing APD ADHD Autism second language learners Roger Dynamic SoundField offers the same stunning sound quality as today s Dynamic SoundField system, but it is now also compatible with Roger ear-level receivers Guaranteeing all children can enjoy Roger levels of speech intelligibility. 3

Roger DigiMaster 5000 Adaptive behavior One DigiMaster 5000 per classroom Microphones: Roger inspiro or Roger inspiro SoundField Options: Roger DynaMic, Roger AudioHub For normal-sized classrooms : 100 m 2 / 1076 ft² and more Floor stand or wall mounted 12-loudspeaker array Audio input Roger DigiMaster 5000 placement Ideal position Roger DigiMaster 7000 15 loudspeakers in an array Adaptive behavior Up to Two DigiMaster 7000s per room Microphones: Roger inspiro or Roger inspiro SoundField Options: Roger DynaMic, Roger AudioHub For larger rooms up to 300 m 2 / 3230 ft² Floor stand or wall mounted Audio input 4

Roger DigiMaster 7000 placement Ideal positioning Roger inspiro Roger inspiro - recommended classroom solution FM Roger SoundField Digimaster x Audiohub DynaMic Dynamic SoundField - Overview Phonak - life is on 5

Dynamic or Adaptive Wireless Technology Benefits for students Improved sentence recognition ability Increased student attention, interaction and participation Quicker acquisition of reading, writing and numeracy skills Easier deciphering of language in early learning years Better understanding of teacher for non-native speakers Expanded seating options for students with attention deficit issues Benefits for teachers 100% of teachers identified a decrease in vocal strain and fatigue as a key personal benefit of using a soundfield amplification system Teacher absences due to vocal strain and voice fatigue decreased from 15% percent to an average of 2-3% in one year (MARRS, 2005b) Aids class instruction and management Fewer discipline problems through improved voice-control of students Less stress Improved in-class mobility 6

What teachers say about Roger Dynamic SoundField When I forget to turn it on the students are quick to remind me. I think Roger Dynamic SoundField is the best system I have had the opportunity to use in my 20 years of teaching. Sarah Daoust, elementary school teacher, Michigan, USA. Roger SoundField Research Dynamic SoundField research overview Topic Researcher Place More information in Teacher benefits Brent Tustin New Zealand Field Study News Performance Felix Goldbeck Switzerland Field Study News Clickers Debi Vickers London Publication Acoustics Bradford Barackus London Publication submitted Performance & FM Jace Wolfe Oklahoma Presentation, publication expected 7

Latest soundfield research by Jace Wolfe Compare Dynamic SoundField versus a fixed-gain, soundfield system utilizing four loudspeakers strategically placed in the classroom In quiet and in noise With normal hearing listeners and listeners with a hearing loss Children and adults Comparisons: Dynamic SoundField Dynamic SoundField + Personal FM Fixed-gain, multi-loudspeaker soundfield Fixed-gain, multi-loudspeaker soundfield + Personal FM Personal FM alone Main inclusion criteria Normal hearing children 5 to 13 years old No reported history of language, processing, or attention disorders Normal hearing adults 18 to 50 years old No history of significant otologic disorders Children with hearing loss 5 to 13 years old Four-frequency pure tone average between 35-75 db HL Full-time hearing aid users At least 60% correct on age-appropriate monosyllabic word recognition test Spoken language aptitude within one year of chronological age Subjects 15 Children with Hearing Loss 6-13 years old Mean Age: 9.5 years old 4FPTA Range: 35 to 68.75 db 15 Children with Normal Hearing 5-12 years old Mean Age: 8 years old 10 Adults with Normal Hearing 18-48 years old Mean Age: 34 years old 8

Mean Hearing Loss N = 15 Subjects wore a variety of behind-the-ear hearing aids. Audio Enhancement Elite II Classroom Audio Distribution System Tear Drop Infrared Mic Audio Enhancement Elite II 30 Watt Receiver/Amplifier Infrared Dome Sensor Four WS09 Wall-mounted loudspeakers Classroom Setup: dimensions Nose 8 in HINT Noise 22 ft, 4 in 18 ft 15 ft, 5 in schematic diagram 9

Background noise levels Classroom noise was presented from the four loudspeakers in the corners of the room Nose Tested in: HINT Noise Quiet & Noise at 50 db(a) L1 55 db(a) 60 db(a) 65 db(a) LEVEL: L1 = L2 70 db(a) 75 db(a) L2 Positioning of loudspeakers Phonak DigiMaster 5000 Nose HINT Noise AE Elite II AE Elite II Presentation level of HINT sentences HINT sentences presented at 85 db(a) to microphonenose HINT HINT sentence level at the subject was 64 db(a) L1 L2 10

Gain settings The output of Nose the Phonak DigiMaster 5000 was set to the automatic default setting. HINT The gain of the Elite II was set to provide an equivalent level in quiet at the subject location. LEVEL: L1 = L2 This resulted in the HINT sentences being presented at 68 db(a) at the subject location. L2 Test Conditions No soundfield or personal FM Roger Dynamic SoundField alone Audio Enhancement Elite II alone Roger Dynamic SoundField + Personal FM Roger inspiro to DigiMaster 5000 and Personal FM Audio Enhancement Elite II + Personal FM Roger inspiro connected to audio output port of Elite II Personal FM alone Roger inspiro to personal FM Results: speech recognition without soundfield or personal FM % Correct Noise Level (dba) 11

Results Adults understand speech in noise better than children Children with normal hearing understand speech in noise better than children with hearing loss The difference between groups becomes greater at higher noise levels All groups experience more trouble in noise (60, 65, 70, & 75 db(a)). Performance became progressively poorer from 60 to 75 db(a) Normal hearing adults with soundfield % Correct Noise Level (dba) Results Soundfield improve adults speech recognition in noise at noise levels of 65, 70, and 75 db(a) Roger Dynamic SoundField provided better speech recognition in noise than Audio Enhancement Elite II system at 70 and 75 db(a) 12

Normal Hearing Children with soundfield % Correct Noise Level (dba) Results Soundfield improves speech recognition in noise of children with normal hearing at noise levels of 60, 65, 70, and 75 db(a) Roger Dynamic SoundField provided better speech recognition in noise than Audio Enhancement Elite II system at 70 and 75 db(a) Children with hearing loss No soundfield % Correct Noise Level (dba) 13

Results Soundfield improves speech recognition in noise of children with hearing loss at noise levels of 60, 65, 70, and 75 db(a) Roger Dynamic Soundfield provided better speech recognition in noise than Audio Enhancement Elite II system at 70 and 75 db(a) Soundfield performance across groups % Correct Noise Level (dba) Soundfield Soundfield + Personal FM No soundfield nor personal FM 14

Results Personal FM better than no FM at all noise levels. Personal FM better than soundfield at 60, 65, 70, and 75 db(a) Roger Dynamic SoundField + Personal FM Personal FM alone No soundfield nor personal FM No difference in performance between soundfield + personal FM versus personal FM alone Children with Hearing Loss Soundfield + FM Personal FM No soundfield nor personal FM % Correct Noise Level (dba) 15

Results Roger Dynamic SoundField + personal FM and personal FM alone are both better than Audio Enhancement soundfield + personal FM at 60, 65, 70, and 75 db(a) Children with hearing loss Soundfield vs. soundfield + Personal FM What to do? No soundfield nor personal FM % Correct Noise Level (dba) Possible causes of decreased speech understanding Loss of adaptive (Dynamic) signal Loss of noise pre-processing at inspiro Insufficient input from audio output of the other CAD to inspiro Antenna in FM inspiro AAA guideline states: 5.2.3. Coupled ADS and Personal FM Verification Because of potential undesirable variation when interfacing a classroom ADS and personal FM System, the connection of the personal FM Transmitter to the audio output of the ADS is not recommended. The teacher should wear two microphones, one for the personal FM Receivers(s) and one for the ADS (parallel signal processing). Alternatively, the teacher may wear a transmitter that directly serves, both the personal FM Receivers(s) worn by the student(s) and an FM Receiver that provides input to the ADS (sequential signal processing). 16

Good News Children with Hearing Loss vs. Gold Standard % Correct Noise Level (dba) Conclusions/Clinical Implications Adults understand speech in noise better than children. Children with NH understand speech in noise better than children with HL. Soundfield improves speech recognition in noise for all subjects Dynamic SoundField provides better speech recognition in noise than fixed-gain soundfield Personal FM provides the largest improvement in speech recognition in noise. Phonak Dynamic SoundField + Personal FM provides better performance in noise than AE Elite II + Personal FM. Little to no speech recognition in noise improvement with Phonak Dynamic SoundField + Personal FM vs. Personal FM alone. But soundfield may improve classroom acoustics in real world. Roger Focus Because every child deserves the chance to focus 17

Roger Focus Unilateral hearing loss Minimal hearing loss Auditory processing disorder ADHD Autism Dyslexia Zero hassle and full compatability Turn on Connect Go! Focus on fun 18

Roger Pen Easily access other talkers in the classroom Student can have control of microphone Focus on flexibility Roger Microphones and Focus Educational Microphones Roger Pen Roger Clip-On Mic Receiver Roger Focus (02) Roger Pen in detail Mic mode Connect On/Off Bluetooth for smart phone connection 19

The Roger Pen features an accelerometer An accelerometer is a small mechanical and electronic component that measures accelerations in three dimensions (X, Y and Z) The accelerometer continuously informs the Roger Pen about its orientation with respect to the direction of gravity to choose a microphone mode automatically It also tells the Roger Pen when it is accidentally dropped Smart phones use accelerometers for instance to rotate pictures to avoid they are ever displayed upside down Automatically chooses microphone mode Lanyard - Useful for listening to one single talker (teacher) Conference - Place flat on the table to listen to several talkers (group work) Interview - Point in the direction of the talker (students asking questions) Listening to Multimedia via the Audio Cable or docking station Instant broadcasting of audio signal when audio is played Microphones are muted Use audio cable to plug into headphone jack of computer Connect docking station to smart board, media, etc. 20

Roger Clip-On Mic in detail Connect On/Off Maximum performance: Roger Focus evidence Speech-in-noise testing revealed an average improvement of 53% with Roger Focus compared to no device 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% no device Roger Focus 30% 20% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 N=15 BKB-SIN, -5dB SNR noise at 65dBSPL Note: with the exception of subjects 3 and 9 all individual scores showed significant improvement Subjects 2, 4, 12, and 14 scored 0% without any device and almost 100% with Roger Focus. 21