The Window for Fibrinolysis. Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD Leuven, Belgium

Similar documents
Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD Leuven, Belgium

Current Advances and Best Practices in Acute STEMI Management A pharmacoinvasive approach

Pharmaco-Invasive Approach for STEMI

STREAM - ONE YEAR MORTALITY STRATEGIC REPERFUSION EARLY AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. STREAM 1Y AHA 2013 P Sinnaeve

The Strategic Reperfusion Early After STEMI study Implications for clinical practice

SHOULD A REGIONAL STEMI CENTRE ONLY OFFER PRIMARY PCI?

Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Is it beneficial to patients?

Critics of Thrombolytics: Is Pre-Hospital Clot-busting Actually a Bad Thing? David Persse, MD Houston Fire Department EMS

PPCI in STEMI. ESC at the 22nd Annual Conference of the Saudi Heart Association February 21th, 2011

Thrombolysis in Cardiology to whom? Professor Steen D. Kristensen, MD, DMSc, FESC Department of Cardiology

ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs)

Recommendations for criteria for STEMI systems of care: A focus on pharmacoinvasive strategies

New Insights on Reperfusion Choices Implications of STREAM. Paul W Armstrong MD

Management of STEMI in era of Reperfusion. Eagles Peter Moyer, MD, MPH Medical Director Boston EMS, Fire and Police

Transfer in D2B. Scott D Friedman, MD FACC Medical Director, Cardiology Services Shore Health System of Maryland. The Problem

Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction

The Role of DHMC as an ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Receiving Center in a Regional STEMI Care Network:

PHARMACO-INVASIVE STRATEGY COMPARED WITH PPCI: DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOMES OF THE STREAM TRIAL

STEMI 2014 YAHYA KIWAN. Consultant Cardiologist Head Of Cardiology Belhoul Specialty Hospital

Myocardial Infarction In Dr.Yahya Kiwan

Clinical Seminar. Which Diabetic Patient is a Candidate for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - European Perspective

The Need for Rescue PCI after Failed Fibrinolysis: Who, When and Why.

Patient Transfer. Mark de Belder The James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough

Improving the Outcomes of

Acute Coronary Syndrome

DISCUSSION QUESTION - 1

Controversies on Primary angioplasty in STEMI

2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Update on the management of STEMI. Elliot Rapaport, M.D. San Francisco, CA December 14, 2007

Decision for fibrinolysis or primary PCI in the prehospital phase

Updated and Guideline Based Treatment of Patients with STEMI

Management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction Update 2009 Late comers: which options?

Guideline for STEMI. Reperfusion at a PCI-Capable Hospital

Acute Coronary Syndrome: Interventional Strategy

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in China: Where are we?

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Lecture fees: AstraZeneca, Ely Lilly, Merck.

NEBRASKA STEMI CONFERENCE 2015 Dr. Doug Kosmicki. 2013, American Heart Association

Thrombolysis, adjunctive pharmacology and interventions

REFERRAL HOSPITAL. The Importance of Door In Door Out Time DIDO

Regional STEMI Transfer Systems: the Mayo and NC RACE Experiences

REVIEW OF FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY IN STEMI

Patient and System Time Delay

The role of pre hospital thrombolysis. Aaron Frimerman Hillel Yaffe Medical Center Hadera Israel

Level One STEMI Connecting the Dots changing Points of Care into Systems of Care

STEMI update. Vijay Krishnamoorthy M.D. Interventional Cardiology

Improving STEMI outcomes in Denmark. Michael Rahbek Schmidt, MD, PhD. Aarhus University Hospital Skejby Denmark

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Cardiovascular Health Nova Scotia Update to Antiplatelet Sections of the Nova Scotia Guidelines for Acute Coronary Syndromes, 2008.

STEMI AND MULTIVESSEL CORONARY DISEASE

Optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy for patients treated in STEMI network

Management of Cardiogenic shock. Prof. Christian JM Vrints

Acute Coronary Syndromes

ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction- Focus Emergency Care

Pathophysiology of ACS

ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI): Optimal Antiplatelet and Anti-thrombotic Therapy in the Emergency Department

ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (STEMI): DECREASING THE TIME TO TREATMENT IN THE ED

I have no financial relationships to disclose

A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

Update on Antithrombotic Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Nova Scotia Guidelines for Acute Coronary Syndromes (Updating the 2008 Antiplatelet Section of the Guidelines)

Effect of upstream clopidogrel treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI

What is new in the Treatment of STEMI? Malcolm R. Bell, MBBS Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN

Antithrombotic Therapy in ACS Pretreatment in STEMI. Christian W. Hamm Kerckhoff Heart & Thorax Center Bad Nauheim Germany

Patient characteristics Intervention Comparison Length of followup

Systems of Care to Improve Timeliness of Reperfusion Therapy for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction During Off Hours

Tailoring adjunctive antithrombotic therapy to reperfusion strategy in STEMI

Sanford Chest Pain Network: Improving Rural STEMI Outcomes

ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction- Latest AHA recommendations

PCI Strategies After Fibrinolytic Therapy

Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Mode of admission and its effect on quality indicators in Belgian STEMI patients

At the most severe end of the spectrum of acute coronary syndromes is ST-segment

Learning Objectives. Epidemiology of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Sonny Achtchi, DO

STEMI ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Lessons from BMC2-PCI

Timing of Surgery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 35, No. 4, by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /00/$20.

ACTION Registry GWTG Research and Publications Update

A Report From the Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI-2)

Thrombus Aspiration before PCI: Routine Mandatory. Professor Clinical Cardiology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam

ESC 2012: Klinisch relevante Neuigkeiten beim ACS

STEMI: Newer Aspects in Pharmacological Treatment

4. Which survey program does your facility use to get your program designated by the state?

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Rescue PCI Versus a Conservative Approach for Failed Fibrinolysis in Patients with STEMI

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

Optimal antithrombotic therapy:

UPDATE ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES. Dr. Wayne Tymchak April 7, 2017

Cardiogenic Shock. Carlos Cafri,, MD

Acute Coronary syndrome

Subsequent management and therapies

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is the consequence of

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Cindy Baker, MD FACC Director Peripheral Vascular Interventions Division of Cardiovascular Medicine

STEMI Presentation and Case Discussion. Case #1

Clinical Case. Management of ACS Based on ACC/AHA & ESC Guidelines. Clinical Case 4/22/12. UA/NSTEMI: Definition

Primary PCI State of the Art. A/Prof Michael Nguyen Fremantle Hospital/Fiona Stanley Hospital Perth Australia JCR Meeting Busan 2014

Earlier reperfusion in patients with ST-elevation Myocardial infarction by use of helicopter

Pre Hospital and Initial Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Transcription:

The Window for Fibrinolysis Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD Leuven, Belgium

ESC STEMI Guidelines : December 2008

Reperfusion Therapy: Fibrinolytic Therapy Recommendations Class LOE In the absence of contraindications and if primary PCI cannot be performed within the recommended time I A A fibrin-specific agent should be given I B Pre-hospital initiation of fibrinolytic therapy IIa B

Reperfusion Therapy Recommendations Class LOE Indicated in all pts with chest pain/discomfort of < 12 h and with persistent ST-segment elevation or (presumed) new LBBB I A Should be considered if there is clinical and/or ECG evidence of ongoing ischaemia if symptoms started > 12 h before IIa C Reperfusion (PCI) in stable pts presenting > 12 h to 24 h after symptom onset IIb B PCI of totally occluded infarct artery in stable pts > 24 h after symptom onset without signs of ischaemia III B

ESC 2008 STEMI Guidelines Reperfusion Strategies

Absolute Benefitt per 1,000 Treated Patients The Importance of Time to Treatment A Meta-analysis of 50,246 Pts in placebo controlled trials of Lytic Therapy 80 60 40 20 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Boersma E, et al. Lancet. 1996; 348: 771-5 Time to Treatment 11/5/2010

Myocardial Reperfusion by PPCI assessed by CMR Infarct Size Edema Myoc. Salvage MVO Time to reperfusion from sympton onset: <90 90-150 150-360 <360 min Francone et al.jacc 2009;54:2145 11/5/2010

30-Day Mortality of STEMI Patients by % Treated Within Recommended Delays and % Receiving Reperfusion With PPCI Lambert, L. et al. JAMA 2010;303:2148-2155.

PCI Related Delay (DB-DN) Where PCI and Fibrinolytic Mortality Are Equal (Min) PCI vs. Lysis: Importance of Presentation Delay and Baseline Characteristics Data from NRMI 2,3 and 4 Registries 180 168 179 10.614 148 120 60 0 20.424 9.812 107 NonAnt MI 65+ YRS Ant MI 65+ YRS 3.739 41.774 NonAnt MI <65 YRS 103 16.119 58 43 40 19.517 Ant MI <65 YRS 5.296 0-120 121+ Prehospital Delay (min) Pinto et al. Circulation, 2006

ACC/AHA STEMI Guidelines : November 2009 11/5/2010

Transport of Patients with STEMI and Initial Reperfusion Treatment Onset of symptoms of STEMI GOALS 5 min 8 min 9-1-1 EMS dispatch EMS Transport EMS on scene Encourage 12-lead ECGs Consider pre-hospital fibrinolytic if capable and EMS to needle within 30 min Patient EMS Pre-hospital fibrinolysis EMS to needle 30 min Dispatch 1 min Golden Hour = 1 st 60 min EMS transport EMS-to-balloon 90 min Patient self-transport Hospital door-to-balloon 90 min Total ischaemic time: within 120 min Hospital fibrinolysis: Door to needle 30 min Not PCI capable Interhospital transfer PCI capable Antman, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:671-719. Antman, et al. Circulation 2004;110: 588-636.

The Real World 11/5/2010

Cumulative Time-to-Balloon Intervals in OTTAWA Le May M et al. N Engl J Med 2008;358:231-240

% of patients Time delays in Transfer Patients for Primary PCI 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 33.2 21.8 15.9 13.6 7.8 4.4 3.0 0.3 <1 1 to <2 2 to <3 3 to <4 4 to <5 5 to <6 6 to <7 >=7 Total Door-to-Balloon Time (Hours) Nallamothu et al. Circulation, 2005

MINNESOTA Study: First Door-to-Balloon % Henry, T. D. et al. Circulation 2007;116:721-728 Zone 1 : < 60 miles Zone 2 : 60-210 miles Copyright 2007 American Heart Association

MAYO STUDY : Door-to-balloon and door-to-needle times for group A (PCI-hospital), group B (regional hospital transfer for PCI), and group C (regional hospital fibrinolysis) Copyright 2007 American Heart Association Ting, H. H. et al. Circulation 2007;116:729-736

Mortality Estimates for 6209 Danish Patients With STEMI Treated With Primary PCI Terkelsen, C. J. et al. JAMA 2010;304:763-771.

Two Different Strategies Facilitated PCI: pharmacological reperfusion treatment delivered prior to a planned PCI in order to bridge the PCI-related time delay Pharmacoinvasive strategy: intravenous fibrinolytic treatment, followed by coronary angiography on an urgent basis if lytic therapy failed (rescue PCI) or later to determine long-term treatment (PCI, CABG, medical).

A Conservative vs Invasive Transfer Appraoch DANAMI-2: benefits of PPCI even in transfer patients Rescue PCI: 1.8% Any Revasc: 17% 10% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% DANAMI-2: Results Death P=0.35 Lytic Recurrent MI P<0.001 Primary PCI Stroke P=0.15 CAPTIM: lower mortality with PHT up to 5 years Rescue PCI: 26% Any Revasc: 72% 10% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% CAPTIM: 30-day & one-year result PHT PCI 30-d One year Death P=NS N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 733-42 Bonnefoy et al. Lancet 2002 & AHA 2002

Comparison of key results from DANAMI-2 and CAPTIM Results DANAMI-2 Trial CAPTIM Trial In-hospital fibrinolysis (n = 562) Transfer to PPCI (n = 567) Prehospital fibrinolysis (n = 419) Transfer to PPCI (n = 419) Median age (years) 64 62 58 58 Median time to fibrinolysis (min) Median time to PCI (min) 169 107 224 190 Rescue PCI (%) 1.8 26 Reinfarction (%) 6.2 1.9 3.7 1.7 17 72 Elective revascularization (%) 30-day all-cause mortality (%) All-cause mortality at follow-up* (%) Cardiac mortality at follow-up* (%) 8.5 6.5 3.8 4.8 33.3 26.7 9.7 12.6 16.4 12.8 *In the first 30-days. Follow-up was 5 years in the CAPTIM Trial and 7.8 years in the DANAMI-2 Trial. Abbreviations: CAPTIM, comparison of primary angioplasty and pre-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction; DANAMI, Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction; NA, not applicable; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Red-Zone II (90-120mins) Blue-Zone I (<90 mins) Zone 1 Protocol Aspirin 325 mg Clopidogrel 600mg UFH Beta-blocker PCI

Protocol focus: Simple Fast Reduce variability Red-Zone II (90-120mins) Blue-Zone I (<90 mins) Zone 2 Protocol Aspirin 325 mg Clopidogrel 600mg UFH TNK ½ dose Beta-blocker PCI

Time to reperfusion segments (min) Symptoms to hospital In door out door Door to fibrinolytic Transport Door to balloon Total reperfusion PCI Hosp 103 (60, 232) NA Zone 1 (<60 miles) 88 (47, 195) 49 (36, 67) Zone 2 (60-210 miles) 88 (44,185) 61 (48, 83) NA NA 29 NA 64 (44, 84) 171 (118, 318) 22 (16, 31) 95 (81, 117) 195 (142, 305) 35 (26, 48) 121 (101, 151) 218 (165, 329) P value 0.008/ 0.002 <0.001/ <0.001 <0.001/ <0.001

Patients presenting between 2003 and 2009 Total STEMI N=2,228* ANW N=521 Zone 1 N=992 Zone 2 N=715 PPCI N=521 PPCI N=964 PhInv N=28 PPCI N=144 PhInv N=571 PPCI N=1,485 PhInv N=599 *Excluding no culprits. Patients presented between 2003 and 2009

Baseline characteristics PPCI Ph-Inv P value Age 62.4 ± 14.1 63.3 ± 13.2 0.18 Patients 75 yrs 343 (23.1) 138 (24.0) 0.98 Male 1088 (73.3) 452 (75.5) 0.30 Hyperlipidaemia 820 (57.1) 327 (56.8) 0.88 Hypertension 850 (57.6) 329 (55.1) 0.29 Diabetes 233 (15.8) 101 (16.9) 0.53 Current smoking 593 (40.3) 242 (40.7) 0.87 History of MI 276 (18.7) 114 (10.0) 0.84 History of CABG 91 (6.2) 33 (5.5) 0.58 History of PCI 297 (20.1) 107 (17.9) 0.24

Clinical characteristics Cardiogenic shock before PCI Cardiac arrest before PCI PPCI Ph-Inv P value 155 (10.4) 49 (8.2) 0.12 137 (9.2) 39 (6.5) 0.044 Out of hosp cardiac arrest 79 (5.3) 24 (4.0) 0.21 Anterior MI 499 (33.8) 211 (35.4) 0.48 Killip Class 2-4 223 (15.0) 86 (14.4) 0.70 LBBB 38 (2.6) 9 (1.5) 0.14

Percentage of patients Pre-PCI patency P<0.001 Ph- Inv PPCI

Results PCI Hosp PPCI N=496 Zone 1 (<60) PPCI N=1,005 Zone 2 (60-210) Ph-Inv N=606 P value PCI Hosp vs. Zone 2 D2B time Mortality hospital Mortality 30 day Re-ischaemia 30 days Major Bleeding Stroke 30 days 64 (44, 84) 95 (81, 117) 123 (102, 151) <0.0001 5.0% 4.4% 5.5% 0.76 5.7% 5.2% 5.8% 0.93 3.0% 0.9% 1.0% 0.014 1.4% 0.7% 1.2% 0.71 1.2% 0.5% 1.0% 0.73

Survival probability Kaplan-Meier survival 1.00 One-year survival 0.75 PPCI Ph-Inv 0.5 0.25 P=NS 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 Days since presentation

Cath lab hospital ambulance STrategic Reperfusion Early After MI Patients presenting with STEMI <3 hrs from onset of symptoms that cannot reliably undergo primary PCI <60 min Group A Group B <75 years: TNK Routine ASA Clopidogrel: LD 300 mg + 75 mg QD Enoxaparin: 30 mg IV + 1 mg/kg SC Q12h Diagnostic angiography + PCI / stent, if indicated > 6 hrs / < 24 hrs 75 years: 1/2TNK Routine ASA Clopidogrel: 75 mg QD Enoxaparin: 0.75mg/kg SC Q12h ECG at 90 min: ST resolution 50% YES NO Rescue angiography + PCI / stent immediately ASA, No lytic Antiplatelet and anticoagulation treatment according to local standards Standard angiography + PCI / stent immediately Ambulance cath lab

2009 ACC/AHA New or Modified Recommendations for Triage and Transfer for PCI Class IIa. It is reasonable for high-risk patients who receive fibrinolytic therapy as primary reperfusion therapy at a non PCI-capable facility to be transferred as soon as possible to a PCI-capable facility where PCI can be performed either when needed or as a pharmacoinvasive strategy. Consideration should be given to initiating a preparatory antithrombotic (anticoagulant plus antiplatelet) regimen before and during patient transfer to the catheterization laboratory.(level of Evidence: B) 11/5/2010

2009 ACC/AHA New or Modified Recommendations for Triage and Transfer for PCI Class IIb. Patients who are not at high risk who receive fibrinolytic therapy as primary reperfusion therapy at a non PCI-capable facility may be considered for transfer as soon as possible to a PCI-capable facility where PCI can be performed either when needed or as a pharmacoinvasive strategy. Consideration should be given to initiating a preparatory antithrombotic (anticoagulant plus antiplatelet) regimen before and during patient transfer to the catheterization laboratory. (Level of Evidence: C) 11/5/2010

Polls at the TCT Website (October 12,2010) 11/5/2010

Conclusions The Window forfibrinolysis Outside the window of primary PCI Whether it should be given up to 12h after onset of infarction is debatable (if primay PCI is not available) Inter-hospital transport of STEMI patients for primary PCI remains major issue 11/5/2010

11/5/2010

Mortality Rates in Control and Treatment Groups for Each Prehospital Thrombolytic Trial Morrison, L. J. et al. JAMA 2000;283:2686-2692.

Recommended Logistics Pre-hospital triage/care: EMS unique telephone number tele-consultation Ambulance Networks: 12-ECG recorder/defibrillator staff able to provide basic and advanced life support implementation of a network of hospitals with different levels of technology connected by an efficient ambulance service using the same protocol Targets: < 10 min ECG transmission < 5 min tele-consultation < 120 min to first balloon inflation < 30 min start fibrinolytic therapy

All RCT Importance of PCI-related Delay Data from Randomized Trials Betriu and Masotti Mortality equipose: 110 min Am J Card 2005;95:100-101 Fibrin-specific Nallomothu, Antman and Bates Mortality equipose : 62 min Am J Cardiol 2004;94:772-774 SK Nallomothu, Antman and Bates Mortality equipose : >170 min Am J Cardiol 2004;94:772-774

Odds of Death with Fibrinolysis Fibrinolysis Better PCI Better Estimated Treatment Effect PCI vs. Lysis: Importance of PCI-related Delay in NRMI 2,3,4 Registries Estimated Treatment Effect and 95% Confidence Intervals Conditional on PCI Related Delay (DB-DN)(min) After Adjusting for Covariates 2.0 1.5 1.25 1.0 0.8 0.5 60 75 90 105 114 120 135 150 165 180 PCI Related Delay (DB-DN) (min) Pinto et al. Circulation, 2006

Pre-hospital Management Symptoms compatible with STEMI Pre-hospital diagnosis, triage, care EMS GP/cardiologist Self-decision Ambulance Private transportation *PCI-capable-hospital = 7/24 service! PCI-capable* hospital Transfer if PCI possible < 2h < Non-PCI-capable hospital EMS: Emergency Medical System; STEMI: Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction; GP: General Practitioner; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention Thick arrows: preferred patient flow; dotted line: to be avoided

Percent Dead in Days 0-35 Mortality and the Use of Fibrinolytics According to Age 30 Fibrinolytic Control 25 24.3 25.3 20 15 13.5 16.1 10 5 3.4 4.6 7.2 8.9 0 Age (years) Benefit per 1000: 95% CI: 2 P: <55 55-64 65-74 75+ 11 SD 3 (5 to 17) =0.0002 FTT Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1994;343:311-322. 18 SD 4 (10 to 25) <0.00001 27 SD 5 (16 to 37) <0.00001 10 SD 13 (-16 to 36) NS

CAPTIM: 5 Year Survival Prehospital Thrombolysis vs Primary PCI <2 hrs HR 0.50 (95% CI, 0.25 0.97); P = 0.04 >2 hrs Bonnefoy, E. et al. Eur Heart J 2009 30:1598-1606

Rate of Ischemic Events at the Available Follow-up Time from Fibrinolysis to Routine Early PCI (hr) 1.6 2.3 3.7 3.9 16.7 2.7

Impact of PCI-related delay on Mortality Benefit from Primary PCI All patients 180 min Low risk no relationship Medium risk 92 min High risk 131 min De Luca et al;am J Em Med 2009;27:712-719 11/5/2010

Reperfusion Therapy: Important Time Lines Onset of STEMI FMC Start lytic Reperfusion Onset of STEMI FMC PCI-related delay Reperfusion Balloon Sheath Patient-dependent (Organization-dependent) Organization-dependent FMC:First Medical Contact or First Diagnostic ECG

Polls at the TCT Website 11/5/2010

Absolute Reduction in 35-Day Mortality Versus Delay From Symptom Onset to Randomization in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation or LBBB 40 3,000 Absolute benefit per 1,000 patients with ST-segment elevation or LBBB allocated fibrinolytic therapy ( 1 SD) 30 20 10 14,000 12,000 9,000 7,000 0 0 6 12 18 24 From Symptom Onset to Randomization (hours) Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists (FTT) Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1994;343:311-322. 11/5/2010

100 Relationship Between Myocardial Salvage and Survival 80 Mortality reduction (%) % 60 40 20 Modifying factors Collaterals Ischemic preconditioning MVO 2 0 Hours Extent of salvage (% of area at risk) 1 3 6 12 24 Treatment objectives Time to treatment is critical Gersh B. JAMA 2005 Opening the IRA (PCI > lysis)