Methods to Improve Nutrient Use Efficiency in Rice

Similar documents
If you want a copy of this presentation, or an archive of my papers on nitrogen fertilizer additives, my is:

Nitrogen additives: What is what, and do they work?

Comparison of Ammonia Volatilization from Surface Applied Fertilizers on High, Neutral, and Low ph Soils

Nitrogen Additives and Amendments. 24 th Annual Soil & Soil Water Workshop

Nitrogen Extenders for Nitrogen Fertilizers. Dave Franzen North Dakota State University

Improving the Efficiency of Soil and Foliar Nitrogen Fertilization with a Urease Inhibitor

Wednesday February 12, 2014 Managing P and Zn

Amounts, and Yield Effects

Nitrogen Studies in Corn and Wheat. Joel Ransom NDSU Extension Agronomist

Developing your Fertilizer Management Program. Outline. 2/6/2018. Other factors Species Correct site Weather Weed control. Soil physical properties

Improvement of Nitrogen Fertilizer Efficiency with Nitrification Inhibitors in Lowland Rice

Nitrogen. Cotton Fertility. Glen Harris University of Georgia (Tifton) Sulfur. Phosphorous

Ammonia Volatilization from Urea, Mechanisms, Magnitude, and Management

Improving the Efficiency of Foliar Fertilization with Urea using Urease Inhibitors. Derrick Oosterhuis and Eduardo Kawakami University of Arkansas

Get on Board! BENEFITS:

Solub Ammonium Stabilized Water Soluble Fertilizer

Chemistry and Commercial Fertilizers

Potash Phosphate Nitrogen

ADVANCING CORN YIELDS. Sulf-N Ammonium Sulfate

COMPARISON OF IMPREGNATED DRY FERTILIZER WITH S AND ZN BLENDS FOR CORN AND SOYBEANS

Using Tissue and Soil Tests Together Helps Make Better Decisions. John Lee Soil Scientist AGVISE Northwood, ND

Management Practices to Minimize Urea Volatilization

Urea fertilizer supplies N to a majority of agricultural

Chapter 1: Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management

New Technologies: Products and Additives

GOLF ENVIRO SYSTEMS, INC. Spring Educational Seminar February 22 & 23, 2006

Larry Stein, Texas A & M AgriLife Extension Service. Nitrogen fertilization materials, rates and timing

Enhanced efficiency nitrogen fertilizers: the What, When & Where. Tai McClellan Maaz Nitrogen Director, IPNI

Effect of Mixed Urease Inhibitors on N Losses From Surface-applied Urea

Soil Composition. Air

DOMOGRAN 45 ACTIVATING YOUR NUTRIENT POTENTIAL THE NITROGEN-SULFUR FERTILIZER FROM LEUNA

USE OF OCEANGROWN PRODUCTS TO INCREASE CROP YIELD AND ESSENTIAL NUTRIENT CONTENT. Dave Franzen, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

Soybean Nutrient Profile

Importance of fertigation scheduling

IPADS Soil Fertility Management 4 NITROGEN

Fertilizer Proper Selection and Use. J.B. Sartain University of Florida Gainesville, FL

Agronomy 365 Exam I Spring 2002

FACT SHEET. Understanding Cation Exchange Capacity and % Base Saturation

Influence of Stabilized Urea Nitrogen on Turfgrass Performance and Nitrogen Volatilization Bill Kreuser, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln

DuraTec. Partly Coated Fertilizer Unique Double Nitrogen Technology Immediate and long-term effect Environmentally friendly COMPO EXPERT

Strategies for meeting the N requirement of modern wheat varieties for both yield and protein with new fertilizers and fertilizer additives

Soils and Soil Fertility Management

Nutrient management irrigated corn. Jim Camberato

Wheat Update September 2017 ARKANSAS WHEAT PERFORMANCE TRIALS AND VARIETY SELECTION. Methods

4R Nutrient Stewardship : New Mexico Specifics. Robert Flynn, Extension Agronomist Extension Plant Sciences

in a uniquely natural way.

Sulf-N Ammonium Sulfate PRODUCT GUIDE

SOILS AND PLANT NUTRITION

in a uniquely natural way.

Protein and Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer and Variation of Plant Tissue Analysis in Wheat

Terms used to describe levels of nutrient elements in plants

IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF FOLIAR FERTILIZATION WITH UREA USING UREASE INHIBITORS. Derrick Oosterhuis and Eduardo Kawakami University of Arkansas

Agronomy 354 Quiz 1, January 20, Name (-5 points if not written legibly))

Evaluation of Leading Urease Inhibitors Added to Nitrogen Fertilisers (NBPT and Maleic-Itaconic Co-Polymers)

Objectives: 1. Determine the effect of nitrogen and potassium applications on sugar beet root yield and quality.

Fertilization Programming

Nutrient Management for Texas High Plains Cotton Production

Plants, soil, and nutrients. Created in partnership with Alex Lindsey, Ph.D., The Ohio State University

STUDY ON MANURES AND FERTILIZERS

The following is a brief description of the symptoms of some of the most common nutrient deficiencies in soybeans. Nutrient deficiency symptoms

STUDY ON MANURES AND FERTILIZERS

Cultivar Specific Nitrogen Management Profiles For Irrigated Process Varieties Inkster, ND 2009

AGRITOPIC April 2017 SOIL ACIDITY

AGVISE Laboratories Established 1976

Nutrient Management for Texas High Plains Cotton Production

Essential plant nutrients. Classification of essential plant nutrients

TNPSC Chemistry Study Material Fertilizers

Sulphur blends A manageable solution for enhancing yields

Interpreting Soil Tests for Efficient Plant Growth and Water Use

Fertility Management for Corn on Corn Systems Kyle Freeman. The Mosaic Company

INTERPRETATION GUIDE TO SOIL TEST REPORTS

Nutrient Recommendations Agronomic Crops Last Updated 12/1/16. Grain Corn. Crop Highlights Target ph: 6.0

Potassium and Phosphorus as Plant Nutrients. Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients. Potassium is required in large amounts by many crops

Research Report Forage Sorghum Hybrid Yield and Quality at Maricopa, AZ, 2015

Correction of Zinc Deficiency in Avocado

Biosolids Nutrien Management an Soil Testing. Craig Cogger, Soil Scientis WSU Puyallup

S. Ananthacumaraswamy and L. S. K. Hettiarachchi (Tea Research Institute of Sri Lanka, Talawakelle, Sri Lanka)

15. Mixed fertilizers sources preparations- their compatibility advantages

Plant Food. Nitrogen (N)

Effectiveness on Soil and Foliar Applied Micronutrient Mixes

Sulphur Fertilizer Effect on Crop Development & Quality

SOIL TEST INTERPRETATION JIM FASCHING Technical Field Representative

Nutrient Management in Ornamental Production

Understanding ph management and plant nutrition Part 3: Fertilizers

FERTIGATION 24 FERTIGATION WITH DRIPPERS

Lecture 26. Other Phosphate Fertilizers Part 2

A New Innovation in Plant Nutrients

Soil Testing and Interpretation

Recent soybean fertility studies. R. Jay Goos and Hannah Ohm Department of Soil Science North Dakota State University

WHAT ARE FERTILIZERS

Markus Braaten. Elston D. Solberg. Director of Agri-Knowledge Agri-Trend. US Director of Agri-Knowledge Agri-Trend USA

1101 S Winchester Blvd., Ste. G 173 San Jose, CA (408) (408) fax Page 1 of 2

nitrogen Advanced technology management TECHNOLOGY PAST THE POINT OF NUTRITION to increase N efficiencies through improved agronomics & handling

May 2008 AG/Soils/ pr Understanding Your Soil Test Report Grant E. Cardon Jan Kotuby-Amacher Pam Hole Rich Koenig General Information

Effects of the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl)phosphorothioic triamide in low concentrations on ammonia volatilization and evolution of mineral nitrogen

Interpreting Plant Tissue and Soil Sample Analysis

Plant, Soil, and Nutrients

PRACTICE EXAM 3 (from fall 1999)

MU Cropping Systems Rice Research Review. Matthew Rhine University of Missouri

Transcription:

Methods to Improve Nutrient Use Efficiency in Rice Timothy W. Walker, Ph. D. Associate Agronomist 662 822 2291 6R 2/Room 4 Tuesday 11:10 11:56 Wednesday 10:10 10:56

Nitrogen Use Efficiency NUE = Grain yield (lb/acre) Nitrogen applied (lb/acre)

Nitrogen Use Efficiency Yield Genetics Management Variety Selection Breeding Agronomic Pest

Nitrogen Use Efficiency N Rate Decrease N Rate Maintain N Rate Account for Soil Supply Account for Plant Need Prevent Loss N ST*R (U of A) Rate Response Chlorophyll Plant Area Board Sensorbased Ammonia Nitrate Agrotain Water Water Nitrification Inhibitors

Nitrogen Use Efficiency Maintain N Rate Prevent Loss Ammonia Nitrate Agrotain Water Water Nitrification Inhibitors

Urea s Reaction Produces NH 3 Gas 2 NH 3 ammonia gas on soil surface or in flood -H 2 O & CO 2 CO(NH 2 ) 2 (NH 4 ) 2 CO 3 2 NH 4 + + 2 OH - urea urease (ph ~ alkaline) ammonium salt in soil Note: Urea s reaction in soil initially is alkaline and increases soil ph causing ammonia volatilization loss if not incorporated in soil quickly. Slide borrowed from R. Norman

Ammonia Volatilization of Urea Applied to a Conventional Tilled and a Stale-Seedbed Silt loam soil (RREC, 2001) [N source LSD0.05 = 3.1% of applied N] Volatilization (% of applied N) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Ammonia Volatilization Ends at ~10 Days 0 5 10 15 20 25 Griggs etal., 2007; SSSAJ Time (days) Stale-Seedbed Conventional Till Slide borrowed from R. Norman

Ammonia Volatilization Losses (Clay soil) Ammonia Volatilization of 15 N-labeled Urea and Ammonium Sulfate From a Perry Clay Soil 14 Days before Flooding (SEREC, 2000) Volatilization (% of applied N) 30 25 20 15 10 5 Ammonium Sulfate Flood Urea Ammonium Sulfate Urea 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Griggs et al., 2007; SSSAJ Time (days) Slide borrowed from R. Norman

9500 9000 y = 520.4x + 6697.5 a Yield (lb/a) 8500 8000 7500 7000 i a-d e-h 1238 lbs 15 % a-d d-h a-e 581 lbs 7 % a-c Urea Agrotain-Urea Linear (Urea) 6500 6000 5500 5000 10 DPF 7 DPF 4 DPF 1 DPF Rice Research Station fertility and Agronomy Project Application time (Days Prior to Flooding)

NH4 N loss (% of total applied) 25 20 15 10 5 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 Time (days) Urea AS Urea AS Super U Agrotain Urea Rice Research Station fertility and Agronomy Project

9000 (Urease inhibitor only) (Urease and nitrification inhibitors) 8500 a-d c-g a-d b-f a-e b-f a-c a-c 8000 Yield (lb/a) 7500 7000 6500 Agrotain-Urea Super-U 6000 5500 5000 10 DPF 7 DPF 4 DPF 1 DPF Application time (Days Prior to Flooding) Rice Research Station fertility and Agronomy Project

Ammonia Volatilization 12 10 NH3 Volatilization Loss % of applied 8 6 4 2 urea ams agrotain 0 0 5 10 15 20 Days Data from Tunica clay. Dillon and Walker, unpublished

Urea vs Agrotain lb/acre 8800 Source x Timing (P = 0.0024) LSD = 453 8600 8566 8400 8361 8224 8200 8000 7806 7800 LSD = 7 8269 8500 8599 8452 Agrotain Urea 7600 7400 10 7 4 1

Urea vs Agrotain 8000 7800 Source x Timing (P = 0.0024) LSD = 361 7818 7860 LSD = 7 7710 7600 7586 7400 7200 7420 7155 Agrotain Urea 7000 6800 10 7 2

Agrotain vs Super U 8700 8600 8500 8400 8300 8200 8100 8000 7900 7800 7700 Source x Timing (P = 0.0024) LSD = 453 8566 LSD = 7 8599 8488 8331 8224 8269 8113 8056 10 7 4 1 Agrotain Super U

Testing the Mechanism Product Evaluation Agrotainis the only urease inhibitor recommended in Arkansas. Other products unproven to inhibit NH 3 loss include Nutrisphere N Zone Extend Upgrade

Lab Evaluation Upgrade Urea Agrotain Urea Upgrade Urea Cumulative NH 3 Loss (% of applied N fertilizer) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 Time (days) Source: Norman and Roberts (unpublished data)

Lab Evaluation N Zone Cumulative NH 3 Loss (% of applied N fertilizer) 64 56 48 40 32 24 16 8 0 Urea Agrotain Urea N Zone Urea 0 5 10 15 Time (days) Source: Norman and Roberts (unpublished data)

Lab Evaluation Nutrisphere Cumulative NH 3 Loss (% of applied N fertilizer) 64 56 48 40 32 24 16 8 0 Urea Agrotain+Urea Nutrisphere+Urea Ammonium Sulfate 0 5 10 15 Time (days) Source: Franzen et al. (2011, in press) J. Plant Nutr. 0.25% Nutrisphere added

Lab Evaluation Extend Urea Agrotain Urea Extend Urea Cumulative NH 3 Loss (% of applied N fertilizer) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 Time (days) Source: Norman and Roberts (unpublished data)

Nitrification/Denitrification Nitrosomonas 2NH 4+ + 3O 2 2NO 2 + 2H 2 O + 4H + Nitrobacter 2NO 2 + O 2 2NO 3 Permanent Flood NO 3 + H 2 O NO, N 2 O, N 2 (gases)

Nitrogen Stabilizers 180 170 160 164 150 bu/ac 140 137 60 130 131 120 120 110 100 113 10 DBF 2 DBF

Urea Conversion to NO 3 NH 4 remaining (% of initial) 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 Time (days) Dulaney F13S F14 Walker CircleH LA Davis

Urea Conversion to NO 3 Soil A K T 1/2 R 2 % d 1 d Unit less LA 106.3244 (8.6832) 0.1046 (0.0187) 6.6 0.945 F13S 98.1749 (5.0216) 0.0840 (0.0095) 8.3 0.971 Dulaney 92.3076 (8.0813) 0.0708 (0.0139) 9.8 0.910 Davis 101.8352 (7.4631) 0.1353 (0.0218) 5.1 0.961 CircleH 103.3625 (7.8772) 0.1447 (0.0242) 4.8 0.960 F14 105.0458 (7.1418) 0.1573 (0.0236) 4.4 0.970 Walker 96.3323 (5.5211) 0.1672 (0.0212) 4.1 0.977

Nitrification Rate of Urea 120 Nitrification of Urea in two Soils 100 % urea-n as NO3-N 80 60 40 20 Calhoun soil Dewitt soil 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Unpublished data: Golden et al. (2009) Slide borrowed from R. Norman

Grain Yield 8400 8200 8000 7800 7600 7400 7200 7000 Source x Timing (P = 0.0024) 8235 8218 7467 LSD = 7 8071 8041 8069 7994 7642 7858 43% Urea ENTEC Super U Agrotain Data collected at DREC 2010 Sharkey clay soil LSD = 421 2DBF 10DBF

Nitrification Inhibitor Nutrisphere Soil Inorganic N (ppm) 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 NO3 N NH4 N Source: Franzen et al. (2011, in press) J. Plant Nutr. 90 lb urea N/acre; LSD0.05 (8.4 ppm for NO 3 and 4.5 ppm for NH 4 ) Data from Hazelton, North Dakota)

Sensor based

1 NUE Fixed = 35% NUE Sensor = 38% $ Fixed = $447 $ Sensor = $446

Commercially Available Active Sensors Photo courtesty of B. Tubana

Rice Info on the Web www.rice.msstate.edu

Dr. Dustin Harrell Dr. Brenda Tubana Mr. Kevin Dillon Mr. Paxton Fitts Dr. Rick Norman Dr. Nathan Slaton Dr. Bobby Golden Dr. Trent Roberts Special Thanks

Special Thanks