Received 18 December 2008/Returned for modification 9 February 2009/Accepted 9 April 2009

Similar documents
Received 31 March 2009/Returned for modification 26 May 2009/Accepted 22 June 2009

Isolates from a Phase 3 Clinical Trial. of Medicine and College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, Wayne, Pennsylvania ,

Received 26 July 2006/Returned for modification 10 October 2006/Accepted 16 October 2006

Received 13 September 2006/Returned for modification 6 November 2006/Accepted 26 December 2006

Received 21 July 2008/Accepted 3 September 2008

Received 12 December 2010/Returned for modification 5 January 2011/Accepted 16 March 2011

on November 3, 2018 by guest

Table 1. Antifungal Breakpoints for Candida. 2,3. Agent S SDD or I R. Fluconazole < 8.0 mg/ml mg/ml. > 64 mg/ml.

Received 25 September 2006/Returned for modification 4 December 2006/Accepted 26 December 2006

Voriconazole. Voriconazole VRCZ ITCZ

Comparison of microdilution method and E-test procedure in susceptibility testing of caspofungin against Candida non-albicans species

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

Interlaboratory Comparison of Results of Susceptibility Testing with Caspofungin against Candida and Aspergillus Species

Antifungal susceptibility testing: Which method and when?

on December 11, 2018 by guest

1* 1. Vijaya S. Rajmane, Shivaji T. Mohite

METHODS: MINIMAL INHIBITORY AND FUNGICIDAL CONCENTRATION AND TIME-KILLING STUDIES. Gobernado b. Fe, Valencia 46009, Spain.

Rapid Antifungal Susceptibility Determination for Yeast Isolates by Use of Etest Performed Directly on Blood Samples from Patients with Fungemia

Interpretive Breakpoints for Fluconazole and Candida Revisited: a Blueprint for the Future of Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

on December 9, 2018 by guest

Japan Antifungal Surveillance Program (1):

Multilaboratory Testing of Two-Drug Combinations of Antifungals against Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Candida parapsilosis

AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 21 March 2011 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi: /aac

Received 4 August 2010/Returned for modification 23 October 2010/Accepted 19 November 2010

Antifungal Resistance in Asia: Mechanisms, Epidemiology, and Consequences

Echinocandin Susceptibility Testing of Candida Isolates Collected during a 1-Year Period in Sweden

Received 22 November 2007/Returned for modification 29 December 2007/Accepted 12 January 2008

Update zu EUCAST 2012 Cornelia Lass-Flörl

Received 5 August 2004/Accepted 26 September 2004

Research Article In Vitro Susceptibility of Candida Species to Four Antifungal Agents Assessed by the Reference Broth Microdilution Method

Antifungal Activity of Voriconazole on Local Isolates: an In-vitro Study

Antifungal susceptibility profiles of Candida isolates from a prospective survey of invasive fungal infections in Italian intensive care units

Interlaboratory variability of caspofungin MICs for Candida spp. using CLSI and EUCAST methods: Should the clinical laboratory be testing this agent?

EUCAST-AFST Available breakpoints 2012

The incidence of invasive fungal infections

About the Editor Gerri S. Hall, Ph.D.

Received 12 May 2010/Returned for modification 24 June 2010/Accepted 6 July 2010

Amphotericin B, antifungal susceptibility, bloodstream infections, Candida spp., posaconazole, sus-

This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.

Echinocandin and triazole antifungal susceptibility profiles of opportunistic yeast and mould clinical

Received 7 March 2002/Returned for modification 16 April 2002/Accepted 13 June 2002

Antifungal Pharmacotherapy

In Vitro Susceptibility of Invasive Isolates of Candida spp. to Anidulafungin, Caspofungin, and Micafungin: Six Years of Global Surveillance

FKS Mutant Candida glabrata: Risk Factors and Outcomes in Patients With Candidemia

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida Isolates from the Candida Surveillance Study

Antifungal Pharmacodynamics A Strategy to Optimize Efficacy

Sensitivity of Candida albicans isolates to caspofungin comparison of microdilution method and E-test procedure

Received 29 October 2009/Returned for modification 4 January 2010/Accepted 9 February 2010

Received 6 October 2010/Returned for modification 26 December 2010/Accepted 7 January 2011

The Evolving Role of Antifungal Susceptibility Testing. Gregory A. Eschenauer and Peggy L. Carver

Candida albicans 426 (64.0 ) C. albicans non-albicans

Fluconazole Susceptibility Profile of Candida isolates Recovered from Patients Specimens Admitted to Yazd Central Laboratory

ANA ESPINEL-INGROFF* Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia

your lab focus susceptibility testing of yeasts and moulds as well as the clinical implications of in vitro antifungal testing.

ACCEPTED JCM REVISED. In Vitro Susceptibility of Invasive Isolates of Candida spp. to Anidulafungin, Caspofungin, and

Triazole Cross-Resistance among Candida spp.: Case Report, Occurrence among Bloodstream Isolates, and Implications for Antifungal Therapy

Available online at journal homepage:

In Vivo Efficacy of Anidulafungin and Caspofungin against Candida glabrata and Association with In Vitro Potency in the Presence of Sera

Micafungin and Candida spp. Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints. Version February 2013

Candida auris: an Emerging Hospital Infection

BSI. Candida auris: A globally emerging multidrug-resistant yeast 5/19/2017. First report of C. auris from Japan in 2009

JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 3 February 2010 J. Clin. Microbiol. doi: /jcm

Candidemia epidemiology and susceptibility profile in the largest Brazilian teaching hospital complex

Identification and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species isolated from bloodstream infections in Konya, Turkey

Rapid Species Identification and Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida Isolated from Different Hospital Acquired Infections by VITEK 2 System

Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, 1 and The JONES Group/JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, 2 Iowa

Antifungal drug resistance mechanisms in pathogenic fungi: from bench to bedside

Received 1 December 2009/Accepted 26 January 2010

Susceptibilities to amphotericin B and fluconazole of Candida species in Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance of Yeasts 2006

An Update in the Management of Candidiasis

Species distribution and antifungal susceptibility of bloodstream fungal isolates in paediatric patients in Mexico: a nationwide surveillance study

Use of the VITEK 2 system to identify and test the antifungal susceptibility of clinically relevant yeast species

New triazoles and echinocandins: mode of action, in vitro activity and mechanisms of resistance

Received 25 March 2008/Returned for modification 12 May 2008/Accepted 15 June 2008

Epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility of candidemia isolates of non-albicans Candida species from cancer patients

Candidemia: New Sentinel Surveillance in the 7-County Metro

on March 29, 2019 by guest

Species distribution and fluconazole susceptibility of Candida clinical isolates in a medical center in 2002

Department of Medical Mycology and Parasitology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran 3

Evaluation of aminocandin and caspofungin against Candida glabrata including isolates with reduced caspofungin susceptibility

National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases AR Lab Network Candida Testing

9/18/2018. Invasive Candidiasis. AR Lab Network Candida Testing. Most Common Healthcare Associated Bloodstream Infection in the United States?

The antifungal susceptibilities of oral Candida spp isolates from HIV-infected patients

MANAGEMENT OF HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED FUNGAL INFECTIONS

Ana Espinel-Ingroff 1, Elizabeth Johnson 2, Hans Hockey 3 and Peter Troke 4 *

Use of Antifungal Drugs in the Year 2006"

Candida spp. in vitro susceptibility profile to four antifungal agents. Resistance surveillance study in Venezuelan strains

glabrata, Candida bracarensis and Candida nivariensis evaluated by time-kill studies

Laboratory evaluation for determining posaconazole susceptibility of fungi isolated in denture stomatitis

Received 12 May 2009/Returned for modification 22 June 2009/Accepted 12 August 2009

ACCEPTED DIFFERENTIAL FUNGICIDAL ACTIVITY OF AMPHOTERICIN B AND VORICONAZOLE AGAINST ASPERGILLUS SPECIES DETERMINED BY MICROBROTH METHODOLOGY

Review. Ana Espinel-Ingroff

In Vitro and In Vivo Antifungal Activities of T-2307, a Novel Arylamidine

Potato Dextrose Agar Antifungal Susceptibility Testing for Yeasts and Molds: Evaluation of Phosphate Effect on Antifungal Activity of CMT-3

Antifungal Susceptibility of Bloodstream Candida Isolates in Pediatric Patients

Epidemiology and Outcomes of Candidaemia among Adult Patients Admitted at Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM): A 5-Year Review

Update on Candida Infection Nov. 2010

Transcription:

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, June 2009, p. 1942 1946 Vol. 47, No. 6 0095-1137/09/$08.00 0 doi:10.1128/jcm.02434-08 Copyright 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Activity of Contemporary Antifungal Agents, Including the Novel Echinocandin Anidulafungin, Tested against Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., and Aspergillus spp.: Report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2006 to 2007) Shawn A. Messer, 1 * Gary J. Moet, 1 Jeffrey T. Kirby, 1 and Ronald N. Jones 1,2 JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, 1 and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 2 Received 18 December 2008/Returned for modification 9 February 2009/Accepted 9 April 2009 Results from the SENTRY international fungal surveillance program for 2006 to 2007 are presented. A total of 1,448 Candida sp., 49 Aspergillus fumigatus, and 33 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates were obtained from infected sterile-site sources in patients on five continents. Reference susceptibility was determined for anidulafungin, caspofungin, 5-flucytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B by CLSI methods. The implementation of standardized antifungal testing methods for Candida spp. and Cryptococcus spp.(1, 2) and the recent development of testing methods for the filamentous fungi (3, 4) have facilitated the generation of meaningful data to detect and assess resistance to the current clinical armamentarium of antifungal agents. The use of these methods in global longitudinal surveillance programs has been useful in detecting emerging, rarely encountered yeast or mold organisms displaying decreased susceptibility to contemporary antifungal compounds (12, 16) and for monitoring the distribution of yeast and mold species with innate resistance profiles. We summarize here the results of the global SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2006 to 2007) comparing the activities of eight currently marketed antifungal agents tested against clinical isolates from North America, Europe, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region, with susceptibilities interpreted by using established CLSI breakpoint criteria, where available (1, 3). The collection of yeasts included Candida albicans (771 isolates), C. parapsilosis (238 isolates), C. glabrata (202 isolates), C. tropicalis (157 isolates), C. krusei (29 isolates), C. lusitaniae (14 isolates), C. guilliermondii (9 isolates), C. dubliniensis (7 isolates), C. famata (6 isolates), C. kefyr (5 isolates), and C. pelliculosa (4 isolates). The collection also included C. neoformans (33 isolates), and of the 61 molds, only Aspergillus fumigatus (49 isolates) is represented. All yeast and mold isolates were identified at the participating medical centers by the established methods in use at each institution. Isolates were requested to be from bloodstream infections, taken in consecutive order, and limited to one isolate per patient. The rates of occurrence in participating laboratories could then be detected * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Molecular Epidemiology and Fungus Testing Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242. Phone: (319) 335-8172. Fax: (319) 335-6880. E-mail: messers@healthcare.uiowa.edu. Published ahead of print on 22 April 2009. by a prevalence mode. Confirmation of species identification was performed at the central reference laboratory by using Vitek (biomérieux, St. Louis, MO) and by conventional reference methods (5, 17). Anidulafungin (4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14; Eraxis package insert [Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, 2007]), voriconazole (Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY), amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, and 5-flucytosine (5-FC) (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) were obtained as standard powders. Caspofungin (Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ), and posaconazole (Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ) were prepared according to CLSI guidelines at TREK Diagnostics (Cleveland, OH) (1, 3). The final concentration ranges were as follows: anidulafungin, 0.001 to 32 g/ml; caspofungin, 0.008 to 16 g/ml; amphotericin B, 0.12 to 8 g/ml; 5-FC, 0.5 to 64 g/ml; fluconazole, 0.5 to 64 g/ml; itraconazole, 0.015 to 2 g/ml; posaconazole, 0.06 to 8 g/ml; voriconazole, 0.06 to 8 g/ml. The dilution scheme was selected to maximize capture of the MIC 50 (MIC for 50% of the strains tested) and MIC 90 for wild-type and resistant mutant populations and varied by agent. Further, the ranges of newer or investigational agents were expanded in order to identify populations resistant to these newer agents. Micafungin powder was not yet available from the manufacturer at the commencement of testing. The absence of micafungin in comparison with the other available echinocandins is a limitation of this study. Broth microdilution testing for yeasts followed standardized procedures described in the CLSI M27-A3 reference method (1, 2). All of the filamentous fungi were tested under conditions described for the CLSI M38-A2 reference method (3, 4). Quality control isolates C. krusei ATCC 6258, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019, and C. tropicalis ATCC 750 from the American Type Culture Collection were used as recommended (CLSI), and all results were observed within previously published ranges (1 3, 4, 7). All panels were incubated in enclosed, humid containers at 35 C and visualized with a reading mirror at 24 h (echinocandins) and 1942

VOL. 47, 2009 NOTES 1943 TABLE 1. In vitro antifungal agent susceptibilities of Candida and Cryptococcus isolates collected by the SENTRY Program in 2006 to 2007 Species (no. of isolates) and drug MIC 50 /MIC 90 ( g/ml) MIC range ( g/ml) % by category a S SDD R b All Candida spp. (1,448) c Anidulafungin 0.03/1 0.002 4 99.0 1.0 Caspofungin 0.12/0.5 0.03 16 99.8 0.2 Amphotericin B 0.5/1 0.12 2 99.6 0.4 5-FC 0.5/1 0.5 64 95.9 (2.2) 1.9 Fluconazole 0.5/8 0.5 64 93.4 4.7 1.9 Itraconazole 0.06/0.5 0.015 2 67.9 20.6 11.5 Posaconazole 0.06/1 0.06 8 Voriconazole 0.06/0.5 0.06 8 98.3 0.8 0.9 C. albicans (771) Anidulafungin 0.015/0.06 0.002 1 100.0 0.0 Caspofungin 0.12/0.25 0.03 1 100.0 0.0 Amphotericin B 0.5/1 0.12 1 100.0 0.0 5-FC 0.5/1 0.5 64 97.9 (0.1) 2.0 Fluconazole 0.5/ 0.5 0.5 16 99.7 0.3 0.0 Itraconazole 0.03/0.06 0.015 1 97.7 2.0 0.3 Posaconazole 0.06/0.12 0.06 1 Voriconazole 0.06/ 0.06 0.06 0.25 100.0 0.0 0.0 C. parapsilosis (238) Anidulafungin 2/2 0.03 4 95.4 4.6 Caspofungin 0.5/1 0.06 4 99.6 0.4 Amphotericin B 1/1 0.25 1 99.6 0.4 5-FC 0.5/ 0.5 0.5 64 98.7 (0.0) 1.3 Fluconazole 1/4 0.5 32 96.6 3.4 0.0 Itraconazole 0.25/0.5 0.015 2 40.8 57.1 2.1 Posaconazole 0.12/0.25 0.06 1 Voriconazole 0.06/0.12 0.06 2 99.6 0.4 0.0 C. glabrata (202) Anidulafungin 0.015/0.12 0.015 1 100.0 0.0 Caspofungin 0.25/0.25 0.06 2 100.0 0.0 Amphotericin B 1/1 0.12 1 100.0 0.0 5-FC 0.5/ 0.5 0.5 100.0 (0.0) 0.0 Fluconazole 8/64 0.5 64 74.3 15.3 10.4 Itraconazole 1/ 2 0.015 2 3.5 26.7 69.8 Posaconazole 1/4 0.06 8 Voriconazole 0.25/1 0.06 8 90.1 3.5 6.4 C. tropicalis (157) Anidulafungin 0.03/0.06 0.008 0.5 100.0 0.0 Caspofungin 0.12/0.5 0.06 2 100.0 0.0 Amphotericin B 1/1 0.12 2 98.1 1.9 5-FC 0.5/ 0.5 0.5 64 94.9 (0.6) 4.5 Fluconazole 0.5/1 0.5 32 99.4 0.6 0.0 Itraconazole 0.12/0.5 0.03 2 65.6 30.6 3.8 Posaconazole 0.12/0.25 0.06 8 Voriconazole 0.06/ 0.06 0.06 0.5 98.1 0.6 1.3 C. krusei (29) Anidulafungin 0.06/0.5 0.03 2 100.0 0.0 Caspofungin 0.5/1 0.25 4 96.6 3.4 d Amphotericin B 1/1 0.25 2 93.1 6.9 5-FC 16/16 4 32 3.4 (93.2) 3.4 Fluconazole 32/64 8 64 3.5 79.3 17.2 Itraconazole 0.5/1 0.25 2 0.0 79.3 20.7 Posaconazole 0.5/1 0.06 1 Voriconazole 0.25/1 0.12 2 93.1 6.9 0.0 C. lusitaniae (14) Anidulafungin 0.25/0.5 0.12 0.5 100.0 0.0 Caspofungin 0.5/0.5 0.25 1 100.0 0.0 Amphotericin B 0.5/0.5 0.12 0.5 100.0 0.0 5-FC 0.5/ 0.5 0.5 100.0 (0.0) 0.0 Fluconazole 0.5/1 0.5 32 92.9 7.1 0.0 Continued on following page

1944 NOTES J. CLIN. MICROBIOL. TABLE 1 Continued Species (no. of isolates) and drug MIC 50 /MIC 90 ( g/ml) MIC range ( g/ml) % by category a S SDD R b Itraconazole 0.12/0.5 0.03 1 64.3 M28.6 7.1 Posaconazole 0.06/0.12 0.06 0.25 Voriconazole 0.06/ 0.06 0.06 0.25 100.0 0.0 0.0 C. neoformans (33) Anidulafungin 32/ 32 8 32 Caspofungin 16/16 4 16 Amphotericin B 0.25/0.25 0.12 0.5 5-FC 4/8 2 16 Fluconazole 4/8 1 32 Itraconazole 0.06/0.25 0.015 0.25 Posaconazole 0.06/0.12 0.06 0.5 Voriconazole 0.06/0.12 0.06 0.5 a The breakpoint criteria used are those of the CLSI (2008). When testing amphotericin B, a susceptibility breakpoint of 1 g/ml was used. Each value in parentheses is the percent intermediate (CLSI, 2008), and a dash indicates that there is no established breakpoint. b There is no resistant category for echinocandins. The CLSI interpretive guidelines state that strains with echinocandin MICs of 2.0 g/ml are susceptible. MICs of 2.0 g/ml result in classification as not susceptible. c Data are not shown for C. dubliniensis (seven isolates), C. famata (six isolates), C. guilliermondii (nine isolates), C. kefyr (five isolates), C. pelliculosa (four isolates), and four Candida sp. isolates plus two unspecified isolates. d Represents a single isolate. 48 h (all other agents). The MICs of anidulafungin, caspofungin, 5-FC, fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole were read as the lowest concentration at which a significant decrease in turbidity ( 50%) was discerned compared to that of the growth control. Amphotericin B MICs were determined as the lowest concentration at which no visible growth was detected (1). The interpretive breakpoints for susceptibility to anidulafungin and caspofungin (susceptible [S], 2 mg/liter; nonsusceptible [NS], 2 mg/liter), fluconazole (S, 8 mg/liter; susceptible dose dependent [SDD], 16 to 32 mg/liter; resistant [R], 64 mg/liter), 5-FC (S, 4 mg/liter; intermediate [I], 8 to 16 mg/liter; R, 32 mg/liter), itraconazole (S, 0.125 mg/liter; SDD, 0.25 to 0.5 mg/liter; R, 1 mg/liter), and voriconazole S, 1 mg/liter; SDD, 2 mg/liter; R, 4 mg/liter) were those published by the CLSI (2). Interpretive criteria for amphotericin B and posaconazole have not been established, but for comparison, isolates inhibited by amphotericin B at 1 g/ml were considered susceptible. Mold testing panels were aerobically incubated at 35 C in an enclosed container and visualized with a reading mirror at 24 h (echinocandins) and 48 h (all other agents) under a biosafety hood. MICs of amphotericin B, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole were determined as the concentration at which no discernible growth was detected. MICs of 5-FC were determined as the lowest concentration at which a prominent decrease in growth ( 50%) was visualized compared to the growth control (3, 4). As described for anidulafungin (10) and caspofungin (11), minimal effective concentrations (MECs) were determined as the lowest concentration at which a pronounced morphological change from filamentous growth to nonfilamentous growth was observed. The rank order of the 1,448 Candida sp. isolates collected during the 2006 to 2007 SENTRY Program surveillance period (Table 1) from all geographic regions was C. albicans (53.2%) C. parapsilosis (16.4%), C. glabrata (13.9%), C. tropicalis (10.8%), C. krusei (2.0%), and other Candida spp. (3.5%). The species distribution was consistent with Candida spp. collected in prior SENTRY Program monitoring periods (1997 to 1999, 2003) (8, 9, 13). The antifungal activities (MIC 50 s and MIC 90 s, percent categorical interpretation) of the eight compounds tested against Candida spp. and C. neoformans are summarized in Table 1. The CLSI has not established breakpoints for agents in use against C. neoformans. However, posaconazole demonstrated the greatest activity (MIC 90, 0.12 g/ml) against this species. A. fumigatus was the most common (80.3%) of the Aspergillus spp. tested (Table 2). The agents most active against Aspergillus spp. included anidulafungin (MEC 90, 0.008 g/ml), caspofungin (MEC 90, 0.12 g/ml), and posaconazole (MIC 90, 0.5 g/ml). An analysis of Candida species by continent of origin is summarized in Table 3 (APAC region data not shown). Among the four most common Candida species reported, those from North America and Europe had the same rank order (C. albicans C. glabrata C. parapsilosis C. tropicalis), which represents a shift in European species distribution from that in the previous SENTRY Program report (8, 9, 13). C. glabrata rose in prevalence rank from third to second in Europe, and TABLE 2. Activities of seven antifungal agents against 49 A. fumigatus strains collected by the SENTRY Program in 2006 to 2007 Agent MIC 50 /MIC 90 ( g/ml) MIC range ( g/ml) % of isolates inhibited by 1 g/ml a Anidulafungin 0.004/0.008 0.001 0.008 100.0 Caspofungin 0.12/0.12 0.008 0.12 100.0 Amphotericin B 2/2 0.12 2 71.4 5-FC 64/ 64 8 64 0.0 Itraconazole 1/1 0.25 1 100.0 Posaconazole 0.5/0.5 0.06 0.5 100.0 Voriconazole 0.5/1 0.25 1 100.0 a Breakpoint criteria have not been established by the CLSI (2008). For comparison, the percent inhibited by 1 g/ml was used (3).

VOL. 47, 2009 NOTES 1945 TABLE 3. In vitro antifungal agent susceptibilities of Candida isolates collected by the SENTRY Program in 2006 to 2007 Species (no. tested) No. (%) of isolates or MIC 50/90 in g/ml (% susceptible) a North America Europe Latin America All Candida spp. 726 (50.1) 429 (29.6) 274 (18.9) Anidulafungin 0.03/2 (98.9) 0.03/1 (99.3) 0.03/1 (98.5) Caspofungin 0.12/0.5 (99.7) 0.12/0.5 (100.0) 0.12/0.5 (99.6) Amphotericin B 0.5/1 (99.9) 0.5/1 (99.5) 1/1 (98.9) 5-FC 0.5/ 0.5 (95.7) 0.5/ 0.5 (95.3) 0.5/ 0.5 (97.1) Fluconazole 0.5/8 (91.3) 0.5/8 (94.4) 0.5/2 (97.1) Itraconazole 0.06/1 (64.9) 0.06/1 (72.3) 0.06/0.5 (68.6) Posaconazole 0.06/1 0.06/1 0.06/0.25 Voriconazole 0.06/0.25 (97.9) 0.06/0.25 (98.4) 0.06/ 0.06 (99.3) C. albicans 377 (48.9) 260 (33.7) 126 (16.3) Anidulafungin 0.015/0.06 (100.0) 0.015/0.06 (100.0) 0.015/0.06 (100.0) Caspofungin 0.12/0.25 (100.0) 0.12/0.25 (100.0) 0.12/0.25 (100.0) Amphotericin B 0.5/1 (100.0) 0.5/1 (100.0) 0.5/1 (100.0) 5-FC 0.5/ 0.5 (96.8) 0.5/ 0.5 (98.8) 0.5/ 0.5 (99.2) Fluconazole 0.5/ 0.5 (99.5) 0.5/ 0.5 (100.0) 0.5/ 0.5(100.0) Itraconazole 0.03/0.12 (97.3) 0.03/0.06 (98.1) 0.03/0.12 (97.6) Posaconazole 0.06/0.12 0.06/ 0.06 0.06/0.12 Voriconazole 0.06/ 0.06 (100.0) 0.06/ 0.06 (100.0) 0.06/ 0.06 (100.0) C. parapsilosis 122 (51.3) 53 (22.3) 60 (25.2) Anidulafungin 2/2 (93.4) 2/2 (94.3) 1/2 (98.3) Caspofungin 0.5/1 (99.2) 0.5/1 (100.0) 0.5/1 (100.0) Amphotericin B 1/1 (100.0) 1/1 (100.0) 1/1 (100.0) 5-FC 0.5/ 0.5 (99.2) 0.5/ 0.5 (100.0) 0.5/ 0.5 (96.7) Fluconazole 1/4 (95.9) 1/2 (100.0) 1/4 (95.0) Itraconazole 0.25/0.5 (43.4) 0.25/0.25 (43.4) 0.25/0.5 (30.0) Posaconazole 0.12/0.25 0.12/0.25 0.12/0.25 Voriconazole 0.06/0.12 (100.0) 0.06/ 0.06(100.0) 0.06/0.12 (98.3) C. glabrata 133 (65.8) 57 (28.2) 11 (0.05) Anidulafungin 0.06/0.12 (100.0) 0.06/0.12 (100.0) 0.06/0.12 (100.0) Caspofungin 0.12/0.25 (100.0) 0.25/0.25 (100.0) 0.25/0.5 (100.0) Amphotericin B 1/1 (100.0) 1/1 (100.0) 1/1 (100.0) 5-FC 0.5/ 0.5 (100.0) 0.5/ 0.5 (100.0) 0.5/ 0.5 (100.0) Fluconazole 8/ 64 (71.4) 8/16 (78.9) 4/16 (81.8) Itraconazole 1/ 2 (2.3) 1/ 2 (5.3) 1/2 (9.1) Posaconazole 1/4 1/4 0.5/1 Voriconazole 0.25/2 (88.7) 0.25/1 (93.0) 0.12/0.5 (90.9) C. tropicalis 53 (33.7) 36 (22.9) 62 (39.5) Anidulafungin 0.03/0.06 (100.0) 0.03/0.6 (100.0) 0.03/0.06 (100.0) Caspofungin 0.12/0.5 (100.0) 0.12/0.25 (100.0) 0.12/0.5 (100.0) Amphotericin B 1/1 (100.0) 1/1 (100.0) 1/1 (95.2) 5-FC 0.5/ 0.5 (96.2) 0.5/ 0.5 (91.7) 0.5/ 0.5 (95.2) Fluconazole 0.5/1 (100.0) 0.5/1 (97.2) 0.5/ 0.5 (100.0) Itraconazole 0.12/0.5 (62.3) 0.12/0.5 (72.2) 0.12/0.5 (66.1) Posaconazole 0.12/0.25 0.06/0.25 0.12/0.25 Voriconazole 0.06/ 0.06 (100.0) 0.06/ 0.06 (100.0) 0.06/ 0.06 (100.0) a The breakpoint criteria used are those of the CLSI (2008). When testing amphotericin B, a susceptibility breakpoint of 1 g/ml was used. No results are shown for categories with 10 isolates. the C. parapsilosis rank order dropped to third. The impact of the more frequent occurrence of C. glabrata in Europe has yet to be clarified, and further longitudinal surveillance to detect sustained trends in species distribution and antifungal susceptibility appears warranted. Shifts in species distribution were also observed in Latin America and the APAC region, where the 2006 to 2007 rank order of Candida spp. was C. albicans C. tropicalis C. parapsilosis C. glabrata. Among the 19 Candida isolates from the APAC region, no more than 8 were of one species (C. albicans). These yeasts had susceptibility rates ranging from 73.7% (itraconazole) to 100% (anidulafungin, caspofungin, amphotericin B, 5-FC). This report extends the longitudinal global surveillance results for yeast and mold species collected from bloodstream and sterile body site infections and closely monitors developments in species occurrences with antifungal susceptibility processed by established CLSI reference methods (1 3, 4, 15). As the use of routine antifungal testing by commercial or reference procedures remains a practice performed by a distinct minority of clinical laboratories (15), the use of national or

1946 NOTES J. CLIN. MICROBIOL. global antifungal surveillance networks clearly is a necessity to guide formulary choices (8, 9, 12, 13, 16). We thank K. Mellen, T. R. Fritsche, H. S. Sader, and A. Fuhrmeister for significant contributions to study analysis, technical support, and manuscript preparation. This work was funded by a grant from Pfizer, Inc. REFERENCES 1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. M27-A3 reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard, third edition. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. 2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. M27-S3 reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; third informational supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. 3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. M38-A2 reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard, second edition. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. 4. Espinel-Ingroff, A., A. Fothergill, M. A. Ghannoum, E. Manavathu, L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, M. A. Pfaller, M. G. Rinaldi, W. A. Schell, and T. J. Walsh. 2007. Quality control and reference guidelines for CLSI broth microdilution method (M38-A document) for susceptibility testing of anidulafungin against molds. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:2180 2182. 5. Hazen, K. C., and S. A. Howell. 2007. Candida, Cryptococcus, and other yeasts of medical importance, p. 1762 1788. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. L. Landry, and M. A. Pfaller (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 9th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. 6. Jones, R. N., J. T. Kirby, S. A. Messer, and D. J. Sheehan. 2007. Development of anidulafungin for disk diffusion susceptibility testing against Candida spp. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 58:371 374. 7. Krisher, K., S. Brown, and M. Traczewski. 2004. Quality control parameters for broth microdilution tests of anidulafungin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:490. 8. Messer, S. A., R. N. Jones, and T. R. Fritsche. 2006. International surveillance of Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp.: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2003). J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:1782 1787. 9. Messer, S. A., J. T. Kirby, H. S. Sader, T. R. Fritsche, and R. N. Jones. 2004. Initial results from a longitudinal international surveillance programme for anidulafungin (2003). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 54:1051 1056. 10. Odabasi, Z., V. L. Paetznick, J. R. Rodriguez, E. Chen, and L. Ostrosky- Zeichner. 2004. In vitro activity of anidulafungin against selected clinically important mold isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1912 1915. 11. Odds, F. C., M. Motyl, R. Andrade, J. Bille, E. Canton, M. Cuenca-Estrella, A. Davidson, C. Durussel, D. Ellis, E. Foraker, A. W. Fothergill, M. A. Ghannoum, R. A. Giacobbe, M. Gobernado, R. Handke, M. Laverdiere, W. Lee-Yang, W. G. Merz, L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, J. Peman, S. Perea, J. R. Perfect, M. A. Pfaller, L. Proia, J. H. Rex, M. G. Rinaldi, J. L. Rodriguez- Tudela, W. A. Schell, C. Shields, D. A. Sutton, P. E. Verweij, and D. W. Warnock. 2004. Interlaboratory comparison of results of susceptibility testing with caspofungin against Candida and Aspergillus species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:3475 3482. 12. Pfaller, M. A., L. Boyken, R. J. Hollis, S. A. Messer, S. Tendolkar, and D. J. Diekema. 2005. In vitro activities of anidulafungin against more than 2,500 clinical isolates of Candida spp., including 315 isolates resistant to fluconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:5425 5427. 13. Pfaller, M. A., D. J. Diekema, R. N. Jones, H. S. Sader, A. C. Fluit, R. J. Hollis, and S. A. Messer. 2001. International surveillance of bloodstream infections due to Candida species: frequency of occurrence and in vitro susceptibilities to fluconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole of isolates collected from 1997 through 1999 in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3254 3259. 14. Pfaller, M. A., D. J. Diekema, L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, J. H. Rex, B. D. Alexander, D. Andes, S. D. Brown, V. Chaturvedi, M. A. Ghannoum, C. C. Knapp, D. J. Sheehan, and T. J. Walsh. 2008. Correlation of MIC with outcome for Candida species tested against caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin: analysis and proposal for interpretive MIC breakpoints. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:2620 2629. 15. Pfaller, M. A., and R. N. Jones. 2006. Performance accuracy of antibacterial and antifungal susceptibility test methods: report from the College of American Pathologists Microbiology Surveys Program (2001-2003). Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 130:767 778. 16. Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, L. Boyken, C. Rice, S. Tendolkar, R. J. Hollis, and D. J. Diekema. 2008. In vitro survey of triazole cross-resistance among more than 700 clinical isolates of Aspergillus species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:2568 2572. 17. Verweij, P. E., and M. E. Brandt. 2007. Aspergillus, Fusarium, and other opportunistic moniliaceous fungi, p. 1802 1838. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. L. Landry, and M. A. Pfaller (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 9th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.