Supplementary Material

Similar documents
The Synthesis of [14c]Starch from [14~]~ucrose in Isolated Wheat Grains is Dependent upon the Activity of Soluble Starch Synthase

Journal of Agricultural Science Vol. 3, No. 3; September 2011

Large phenotypic variability for stem cell wall (CW) digestibility in alfalfa could be exploited to improve that trait through recurrent selection.

Lignin and structural and non-structural carbohydrates and their association with stem strength components of irrigated spring wheat

Nature Biotechnology: doi: /nbt Supplementary Figure 1. Experimental design and workflow utilized to generate the WMG Protein Atlas.

The Influence of Protein and Protein Blending on Modification and Malt Specifications

SPIKELET STERILITY OF WHEAT IN FARMER'S FIELD IN NORTHWEST BANGLADESH * M. SAIFUZZAMAN 1, QUAZI ABDUL FATTAH 2 AND M.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn Supplementary Figure 1. Behavioral training.

BARLEY CROSSING METHODS

Greenhouse Horticulture

Nutrient partitioning and grain yield of TaNAM- RNAi wheat under abiotic stress

Supplemental Data. Wu et al. (2010). Plant Cell /tpc

SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES: TIPS FOR EVALUATING VARIETIES AND TEST RESULTS. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT

Supplemental Data. Wang et al. (2013). Plant Cell /tpc

A view on the role of metabolites in enhanced stem reserves remobilization in wheat under drought during grain filling

EFFECT OF VERNALIZATION ON GRAIN FILL DURATION AND GRAIN WEIGHT IN SPRING WHEAT

Nitrogen Studies in Corn and Wheat. Joel Ransom NDSU Extension Agronomist

Effects of Soil Copper Concentration on Growth, Development and Yield Formation of Rice (Oryza sativa)

Water deficits in wheat: fructan exohydrolase. (1-FEH) mrna expression and relationship to soluble carbohydrate concentrations in two varieties

Supplementary Figure 1. Recording sites.

The development of a bivariate mixed model approach for the analysis of plant survival data

Growth and Physiological Responses of Diverse Perennial Ryegrass Accessions to Increasing Salinity

Behavioral generalization

Fusarium stalk rot of sorghum in the Northern region. By Lisa Keller and Malcolm Ryley, Agri-Science Qld, DEEDI, 203 Tor St Toowoomba

Selected Topics in Plant Nutrition

Practical experiments / Oil/protein crops

Effect of Plant Height on Fusarium Head Blight in Spring Wheat

Possibility of Using Leaf in vivo Nitrate Reductase Activity as a Biochemical Marker for Predicting Grain Protein Content of Pearl Millet

Genomic Selection for Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Barley

Kil S. Yoo Vegetable & Fruit Improvement Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843

Pattern of grain set in boron-deficient and coldstressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Effect of Shortenings on Qualitative Properties of Typical Iranian Flour and Dough. *Corresponding ۥauthor s

Study of genetic component of variance in seven parents half diallele of oats (Avena sativa L.) for grain yield, its components and protein content

Managing transplant size and advancing field maturity of fresh tomatoes and peppers

Analysis of Yield Components of F1 Hybrids of Crosses between Spring and Winter Wheat Types (Triticum aestivum L.)

Sum of Neurally Distinct Stimulus- and Task-Related Components.

REQUEST FOR SUPPORT TO REGISTER BW980. Type: Canadian Western Red Spring

1.4 - Linear Regression and MS Excel

Effects of source/sink manipulation on grain zinc accumulation by winter wheat genotypes

Table S1 Wheat VIT genes identified in this study. accessed 18 November 2016.

EFFICACY STUDIES OF ORGANIC ACID BASED CHELATED PLANT NUTRIENTS FOR GROWTH AND GRAIN QUALITY UNDER CONTROLLED AND FIELD CONDITION

Nature Biotechnology: doi: /nbt Supplementary Figure 1. PL gene expression in tomato fruit.

Foliar Micronutrients for Broad Acre Crops Higher yield and better quality Balanced trace element supply for healthy crops Insurance against

Sarah Jean Pain. A thesis submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of. Doctorate of Philosophy

Differential responses of grain yield, grain protein, and their associated traits to nitrogen supply in soft red winter wheat

Mathematical models are a powerful method to understand and control the spread of Huanglongbing

AP Biology: Laboratory 1: Principles of the Scientific Method

Supplementary Material for

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn Supplementary Figure 1. Confirmation that optogenetic inhibition of dopaminergic neurons affects choice

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn Supplementary Figure 1

Effects of Zinc on Growth and Physiological Characters of Flag Leaf and Grains of Winter Wheat after Anthesis

Evaluation of advanced sorghum lines for bioethanol production related traits

Association of plasma uric acid with ischemic heart disease and blood pressure:

Crop Staging guide FungiCideS

Undertaking statistical analysis of

Food Proficiency Testing Program Round 38 Wheat Flour

Supplemental Figure 1. Small RNA size distribution from different soybean tissues.

Research Report Forage Sorghum Hybrid Yield and Quality at Maricopa, AZ, 2015

Starch storage in the stems of wheat plants: localization and temporal changes

Delacroix et al Renal effects of renal denervation Supplementary Figure 1: Changes in Ambulatory Blood Pressures and Heart Rate

Stability and Esterification of Lutein in Bread Wheat during Post Harvest Storage in Comparison with Banana. Fauziah Tufail Ahmad

Predicting Potential Grain Protein Content of Spring Wheat with in-season Hand-Held Optical Sensors.

Rapid Quality Measurements of Flour and Wheat in the Milling industry. Phillip Clancy, Next Instruments, Australia.

Quality of oilseeds, protein crops and fibre plants

Supplementary Figure 1: Attenuation of association signals after conditioning for the lead SNP. a) attenuation of association signal at the 9p22.

COMPARISON THE EFFECTS OF SPRAYING DIFFERENT AMOUNTS OF NANO ZINCOXIDE AND ZINC OXIDE ON, WHEAT

Effect of Nozzles on Fungicide Efficacy for Control of Fusarium Head Blight on Barley

Supplementary Figure 1. Gene expression analysis of GSNOR1 and NIA2 in genotypes with altered NO signalling. Relative expression of GSNOR1 in leaves

Supplementary Figures

2001 Annual and Perennial Ryegrass Report

EVALUATION OF STROBILURIN ON BIOPHYSICAL, BIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS IN SOYBEAN [GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL]

Investigation of relationship of chemical composition, viscosity, and metabolizable energy of distillers grains for poultry

Aesthetic Response to Color Combinations: Preference, Harmony, and Similarity. Supplementary Material. Karen B. Schloss and Stephen E.

The specific heat of wheat

IMAZAPYR (267) First draft prepared by Mr M Irie, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tokyo, Japan

The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization on the Expression of Slow-Mildewing Resistance in Knox Wheat

Predicting Pest Activity with Degree-Day Models

Fusarium thapsinum is the dominant species associated with sorghum stalk rot in Queensland and northern New South Wales

GCSE Biology Exam Preparation

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Supplementary Figure 1

Third International Scientific Symposium "Agrosym Jahorina 2012"

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

Evaluation of the effect of different zinc concentrations in grapevine canes grown hydroponically Cláudia Castro (Ref: BI/INTERACT/VW/183/2016)

Essential Soil Nutrients for Plant Growth and Development

COLD TOLERANCE OF VETIVER GRASS

Supplemental Figure S1. Expression of Cirbp mrna in mouse tissues and NIH3T3 cells.

fraction (soluble sugars, starch and total NSC). Conditional and marginal R 2 values are given for

EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF HUMIC ACID PRODUCTS IN TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT. K. Carey and E. Gunn

Food Proficiency Testing Program Round 36 Whole Milk Powder

Stategic Planning for Mitigation of Fusarium Head Blight in Wheat

Postharvest Sample Questions

Reward prediction based on stimulus categorization in. primate lateral prefrontal cortex

Fiber Quality Response of Pima Cotton to Nitrogen and Phosphorus Deficiency

BIOZYME is a product in use by Latin American farmers in a wide range of crops to provide outstanding results for more than 18 years.

Photosynthesis and Degree of Polymerization of Fructan during Reproductive Growth of Meadow Fescue at two Temperatures and two Photon Flux Densities

Effects of jasmonic acid signalling on the wheat microbiome differ between

Meiosis I. Meiosis II. In each empty circle, write the number of chromosomes that would be found in the cell. (1)

Osmotic adjustment increases water uptake, remobilization of assimilates and maintains photosynthesis in chickpea under drought

Transcription:

10.1071/FP15384_AC CSIRO 2016 Supplementary Material: Functional Plant Biology, 2016, 43(10), 919 930. Supplementary Material Truncation of grain filling in wheat (Triticum aestivum) triggered by brief heat stress during early grain filling: association with senescence responses and reductions in stem reserves Hamid Shirdelmoghanloo A, Daniel Cozzolino B,C, Iman Lohraseb A and Nicholas C. Collins A,D A The Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, the University of Adelaide, PMB1 Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia. B School of Agriculture Food and Wine, the University of Adelaide, PMB1 Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia. C Present address: School of Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton North Campus, Bruce Highway, Qld 4701, Australia. D Corresponding author. Email: nick.collins@acpfg.com.au

Fig. S1. Water soluble carbohydrate concentration (WSCconc., mg g -1 DW) in a chosen reference set of 125 wheat stem samples determined using anthrone method, plotted against WSC content of the samples predicted using attenuated total reflectance midinfrared spectroscopy. Dashed line represents the theoretical regression line.

Fig. S2. Means + s.e. for grain number per spike (GNS), grain number spikelet -1 (GNSplt) and single grain weight (SGW) from Experiment 1. GNS and GNSplt were not heat responsive, so combined means for control and heat treated plants are shown. Means with the same letter were not significantly different at P > 0.05 (LSD test).

Fig. S3. Time courses of flag leaf chlorophyll a content (Chla) in control (green circles) and heat-treated plants (red triangles) of 9 bread wheat genotypes (mean ± s.e.). Asterisks indicate where there are significant differences between treatments at P < 0.05. The red bar at the bottom of the plots represents the period of brief heat treatment.

Fig. S4. Time courses of flag leaf chlorophyll b content (Chlb) in control (green circles) and heat-treated plants (red triangles) of 9 bread wheat genotypes (mean ± s.e.). Asterisks indicate where there are significant differences between treatments at P < 0.05. The red bar at the bottom of the plots represents the period of brief heat treatment.

Fig. S5. Maximum water soluble carbohydrate content (WSCmax.), minimum water soluble carbohydrate content (WSCmin.), mobilized WSC (MWSC) and WSC mobilization efficiency (WSCME) of different segments of the main stem (peduncle, penultimate and lower internodes) of 9 bread wheat varieties in control and plants that had been heat-treated for 3 days at 37/27 ºC at 10 days after anthesis. Bars indicate mean + s.e. Note that genotype, treatment and genotype treatment effects were not always significant for these WSC traits (see text for details).

Fig. S6. Time courses of water soluble carbohydrate content (WSCcont.) of the peduncle, penultimate internode and remaining lower internodes of the main stem from control (green circles) and heat-treated plants (red triangles) of 9 bread wheat genotypes (mean ± s.e.). Asterisks indicate where there is a significant difference between treatments at P < 0.05. The red bar at the bottom of the plots represents the period of brief heat treatment.

Fig. S7. Time courses of stem dry weight (DW) of the peduncle, penultimate internode and remaining lower internodes of the main stem from control (green circles) and heat-treated plants (red triangles) of 9 bread wheat genotypes (mean ± s.e.). Asterisks indicate where there is a significant difference between treatments at P < 0.05. The red bar at the bottom of the plots represents the period of brief heat treatment.

Table S1. Measured temperatures (ºC) and relative humidity (RH; %) in the greenhouse. Anthesis and maturity occurred during October and November-December, respectively. Conditions/Month August September October November December Ave. day temp. 21.3 20 19.7 20.1 21.2 Ave. night temp. 17.9 16.5 16.1 16.4 16.9 Ave. min. temp. 16.9 15.6 15.2 15.3 15.8 Ave. max. temp. 23.4 22.7 22.3 22.6 23.9 Min. temp. 14.7 14.8 14.5 14.7 14.4 Max. temp. 25.1 27.8 28.1 25.7 29.7 Days > 30 ºC 0 0 0 0 0 Ave. max. RH 87.0 90.7 89.4 89.4 89.6 Ave. min. RH 55.0 66.3 60.9 66.9 66.7

Table S2. P-values for genotype, treatment and genotype treatment (G T) effects in the linear mixed model analysis of grain growth data from Experiment 2 a, and average and range of heat effects. Trait Genotype Treatment G T Ave. heat effect (%) Range in effect (%) b MGR <0.001 ns c (0.057) ns (0.258) -3.6 +8.8 to -15.7 SGR <0.001 ns (0.235) <0.001-2.3 +18.3 to -16.8 TIP <0.001 <0.001 <0.001-16.0-5.8 to -25.8 GFD <0.004 <0.001 <0.05-13.7-2.1 to -24.2 SGWpred <0.001 <0.001 <0.001-14.6-2.4 to -28.8 SGW a < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001-11.2 +0.7 to -28.1 a SGW from Experiment 1 also shown for comparison to SGW pred. b difference in means of heat vs. control represented, whether differences were significant or not. c ns, not significant (P > 0.05). MGR, maximal grain growth rate; SGR, sustained grain growth rate; TIP, time to inflection point of grain growth; GFD, grain filling duration; SGW pred, final single grain weight predicted from the logistic models. SGW, final single grain weight, measured directly.

Table S3. Correlations between % heat responses. Stem segment Peduncle Penultimate internode Lower internodes Trait SGWpred GFD TIP MGR SGR TotChlav Chla av Chlb av WSCmax WSCmin WSCav MWSC WSCME DWav WSCmax WSCmin WSCav MWSC WSCME DWav WSCmax WSCmin WSCav MWSC WSCME DWav SGW pred - GFD 0.87 ** - TIP 0.95 *** 0.95 *** - MGR 0.35-0.15 0.13 - SGR 0.49 0.01 0.24 0.95 *** - TotChl av 0.93 *** 0.86 ** 0.85 ** 0.17 0.39 - Chla av 0.94 *** 0.85 ** 0.85 ** 0.19 0.41 0.99 *** - Chlb av 0.90 *** 0.86 ** 0.83 ** 0.09 0.31 0.98 *** 0.96 *** - WSC max 0.24 0.22 0.26 0.04 0.05 0.3 0.33 0.23 - WSC min -0.12-0.03-0.1-0.23-0.24 0.01 0.05-0.06 0.23 - WSC av 0.71 * 0.64 0.61 0.09 0.24 0.82 ** 0.80 ** 0.81 ** 0.44 0.24 - MWSC 0.52 0.33 0.47 0.47 0.49 0.39 0.42 0.34 0.56-0.56 0.24 - WSCME 0.48 0.26 0.41 0.54 0.56 0.3 0.31 0.27 0.05-0.82 ** 0.02 0.86 ** - DW av 0.77 * 0.81 ** 0.78 * -0.01 0.13 0.80 ** 0.83 ** 0.73 * 0.55 0.32 0.79 * 0.37 0.1 - WSC max -0.16-0.41-0.34 0.43 0.37-0.23-0.21-0.3-0.09-0.13 0.05 0.2 0.27-0.06 - WSC min 0.2 0.27 0.19-0.08 0.07 0.31 0.37 0.21-0.05 0.4-0.03-0.12-0.11 0.29-0.26 - WSC av 0.31-0.04 0.06 0.62 0.65 0.28 0.27 0.23 0.01-0.06 0.52 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.78 * -0.29 - MWSC -0.08-0.39-0.26 0.56 0.46-0.21-0.2-0.26-0.04-0.31 0.07 0.33 0.4-0.1 0.95 *** -0.48 0.81 ** - WSCME -0.03-0.34-0.16 0.58 0.46-0.21-0.23-0.22-0.03-0.44 0.04 0.35 0.43-0.17 0.74 * -0.73 * 0.73 * 0.91 *** - DW av 0.53 0.3 0.43 0.45 0.48 0.5 0.52 0.43 0.78 * 0.13 0.69 * 0.59 0.22 0.67 * 0.24-0.23 0.56 0.35 0.4 - WSC max 0.36 0.01 0.17 0.70 * 0.76 * 0.3 0.33 0.22 0.46-0.36 0.27 0.80 ** 0.67 * 0.29 0.54-0.11 0.63 0.63 0.58 0.70 * - WSC min 0.09 0.23 0.16-0.23-0.12 0.21 0.27 0.12 0.36 0.45-0.07 0.03-0.18 0.31-0.46 0.86 ** -0.54-0.63-0.81 ** -0.06-0.1 - WSC av 0.29-0.09 0.1 0.72 * 0.74 * 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.24-0.17 0.27 0.35 0.28 0.12 0.27-0.36 0.64 0.45 0.63 0.66 0.71 * -0.39 - MWSC 0.31-0.07 0.12 0.75 * 0.71 * 0.16 0.18 0.11 0.19-0.52 0.24 0.74 * 0.76 * 0.1 0.72 * -0.35 0.73 * 0.83 ** 0.78 * 0.53 0.85 ** -0.43 0.53 - WSCME 0.29-0.08 0.11 0.74 * 0.67 * 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.03-0.54 0.22 0.62 0.72 * 0 0.70 * -0.44 0.73 * 0.84 ** 0.82 ** 0.42 0.69 * -0.57 0.47 0.97 *** - DW av 0.46 0.21 0.4 0.53 0.53 0.36 0.35 0.34 0.44 0 0.41 0.37 0.18 0.39 0-0.36 0.45 0.21 0.46 0.79 * 0.54-0.27 0.88 ** 0.34 0.28 - Pearson s correlation coefficients are shown, together with significance: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Stem segment Peduncle Penultimate internode Lower internodes Cells are coloured green and orange to highlight significant positive or negative correlations, respectively. SGW pred, predicted final grain weight; GFD, grain filling duration; TIP, time to inflection point of grain growth; MGR, maximal grain growth rate; SGR, sustained grain growth rate; TotChl av, total flag leaf chlorophyll a and b averaged over all time points, Chla av, flag leaf chlorophyll a averaged over all time points; Chlb av, flag leaf chlorophyll b averaged over all time points; WSC, main stem water soluble carbohydrates; WSC max, peak WSC value; WSC 11 min, minimum WSC value; WSC av, WSC content averaged over all time points; MWSC, mobilized WSC; WSCME, WSC % mobilization efficiency; DW av, main stem dry weight averaged over all time points.

Table S4. Correlations for trait potentials vs. % heat responses. Trait potential (value in control) Stem segment Peduncle Penultimate internode Lower internodes Trait SGWpred GFD TIP MGR SGR TotChlav Chla av Chlb av WSCmax WSCmin WSCav MWSC WSCME DWav WSCmax WSCmin WSCav MWSC WSCME DWav WSCmax WSCmin WSCav MWSC WSCME DWav SGW pred -0.87** -0.18-0.43-0.83** -0.84** 0.89** 0.85** 0.79* -0.68* -0.38-0.68* -0.76* -0.65-0.68* -0.62-0.39-0.62-0.62-0.11-0.82** -0.91*** -0.43-0.85** -0.87** -0.48-0.92*** GFD -0.71* -0.48-0.56-0.49-0.5 0.79* 0.63 0.89** -0.63-0.51-0.66-0.63-0.27-0.70* -0.59-0.64-0.62-0.48 0.3-0.74* -0.70* -0.64-0.68* -0.57-0.03-0.71* TIP -0.79* -0.35-0.54-0.66-0.66 0.84** 0.76* 0.83** -0.72* -0.5-0.73* -0.76* -0.49-0.75* -0.70* -0.6-0.72* -0.63 0.1-0.86** -0.86** -0.63-0.85** -0.75* -0.25-0.86** MGR -0.39 0.52 0.16-0.73* -0.73* 0.31 0.53-0.09-0.2 0.18-0.14-0.35-0.83** -0.07-0.24 0.35-0.16-0.45-0.80** -0.29-0.53 0.26-0.48-0.69* -0.87** -0.53 SGR -0.5 0.53 0.2-0.83** -0.83** 0.47 0.64 0.12-0.19 0.21-0.13-0.34-0.83** -0.12-0.21 0.35-0.13-0.42-0.74* -0.34-0.6 0.22-0.5-0.75* -0.85** -0.63 TotChl av -0.78* -0.15-0.3-0.71* -0.74* 0.85** 0.76* 0.85** -0.59-0.38-0.6-0.63-0.45-0.63-0.46-0.34-0.49-0.43 0.04-0.69* -0.78* -0.4-0.70* -0.74* -0.34-0.82** Chla av -0.79* -0.13-0.29-0.73* -0.77* 0.89** 0.79* 0.88** -0.62-0.41-0.63-0.67* -0.47-0.65-0.51-0.38-0.53-0.48 0.04-0.72* -0.81** -0.43-0.73* -0.77* -0.34-0.83** Chlb av -0.73* -0.21-0.31-0.62-0.65 0.76* 0.65 0.80* -0.5-0.32-0.51-0.54-0.37-0.58-0.34-0.29-0.4-0.31 0.08-0.63-0.69* -0.37-0.61-0.65-0.29-0.77* WSC max -0.24 0.01-0.08-0.22-0.25 0.25 0.15 0.36-0.70* -0.83** -0.71* -0.6 0.18-0.80** -0.57-0.58-0.73* -0.48 0.17-0.64-0.42-0.61-0.49-0.27 0.08-0.4 WSC min 0.37 0.3 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.11 0.12 0.08-0.25-0.33-0.24-0.2 0.22-0.02-0.08-0.13-0.04-0.04 0.19 0.1-0.04-0.03-0.07-0.03 0.17 0.12 WSC av -0.64-0.23-0.35-0.52-0.55 0.53 0.45 0.55-0.65-0.55-0.66-0.65-0.25-0.58-0.4-0.24-0.45-0.4-0.08-0.54-0.59-0.14-0.53-0.61-0.4-0.56 MWSC -0.73* -0.17-0.42-0.70* -0.69* 0.41 0.37 0.4-0.53-0.4-0.52-0.56-0.4-0.68* -0.62-0.4-0.69* -0.61-0.17-0.74* -0.58-0.44-0.58-0.51-0.32-0.62 WSCME -0.73* -0.2-0.44-0.71* -0.67* 0.34 0.35 0.27-0.2 0.04-0.18-0.29-0.59-0.32-0.38-0.13-0.37-0.43-0.3-0.5-0.44-0.17-0.4-0.44-0.43-0.51 DW av -0.68* -0.22-0.36-0.57-0.58 0.79* 0.68* 0.84** -0.82** -0.72* -0.83** -0.81** -0.25-0.82** -0.79* -0.63-0.76* -0.72* 0.1-0.78* -0.77* -0.55-0.74* -0.68* -0.12-0.68* WSC max -0.21 0.06-0.09-0.31-0.25-0.2-0.09-0.34 0.05 0.18 0.1-0.01-0.31 0.23-0.08 0.37 0.1-0.26-0.65 0.19 0.08 0.63 0.17-0.12-0.49 0.22 WSC min -0.08 0.22 0.24-0.16-0.22 0.58 0.51 0.59-0.07 0.04-0.05-0.1-0.15-0.01-0.12-0.26-0.03-0.04 0.39-0.06-0.24-0.27-0.18-0.18 0.2-0.17 WSC av -0.46 0.2-0.03-0.61-0.57 0.17 0.3-0.06-0.17 0.09-0.13-0.27-0.55-0.03-0.17 0.44-0.03-0.4-0.83** -0.11-0.32 0.54-0.19-0.54-0.78* -0.26 MWSC -0.27 0.06-0.14-0.37-0.31-0.22-0.08-0.4 0 0.16 0.05-0.07-0.38 0.13-0.12 0.4 0.02-0.32-0.77* 0.07 0 0.59 0.07-0.2-0.6 0.09 WSCME -0.21 0.09-0.12-0.33-0.25-0.27-0.1-0.47 0.01 0.15 0.04-0.05-0.35 0.05-0.11 0.43-0.03-0.32-0.84** -0.03-0.05 0.48-0.01-0.21-0.6-0.03 DW av -0.52 0.15-0.1-0.61-0.61 0.43 0.45 0.33-0.74* -0.64-0.73* -0.74* -0.29-0.76* -0.66-0.25-0.70* -0.72* -0.39-0.72* -0.69* -0.28-0.67* -0.68* -0.45-0.64 WSC max -0.56 0.3 0.03-0.75* -0.72* 0.34 0.4 0.2-0.31-0.11-0.27-0.37-0.47-0.42-0.44 0.07-0.39-0.58-0.59-0.48-0.5-0.02-0.41-0.56-0.53-0.51 WSC min 0.05 0.17 0.23 0.01-0.06 0.45 0.33 0.56-0.24-0.3-0.24-0.19 0.15-0.27-0.23-0.53-0.26-0.07 0.62-0.22-0.21-0.59-0.24-0.04 0.44-0.16 WSC av -0.21 0.61 0.38-0.52-0.49 0.2 0.35-0.07-0.1 0.1-0.07-0.18-0.41-0.23-0.16 0.43-0.13-0.39-0.81** -0.31-0.43 0.15-0.35-0.53-0.59-0.5 MWSC -0.63 0-0.3-0.72* -0.68* 0.13 0.23-0.05-0.28-0.03-0.23-0.36-0.61-0.21-0.34 0.15-0.29-0.49-0.67* -0.34-0.37 0.25-0.31-0.5-0.74* -0.35 WSCME -0.6-0.09-0.38-0.66-0.62 0.04 0.17-0.16-0.23 0.04-0.19-0.33-0.66-0.09-0.24 0.22-0.2-0.4-0.69* -0.25-0.31 0.36-0.27-0.47-0.81** -0.3 DW av -0.27 0.41 0.18-0.49-0.46 0.36 0.46 0.14-0.42-0.27-0.42-0.46-0.34-0.55-0.45 0.06-0.46-0.59-0.59-0.59-0.62-0.21-0.61-0.63-0.45-0.66 Pearson s correlation coefficients are shown, together with significance: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Cells are coloured green and orange to highlight significant positive or negative correlations, respectively. Positive association mean higher value in control was associated with less negative response (stability). Negative assocation mean higher value in control was associated with more negative response (instability). Greyed out values represent comparisons between arithmetically related variables where the direction of the correlation (significant or not) is consistent with the possibility that the correlation was a mathematical artefact. SGW pred, predicted final single grain weight; GFD, grain filling duration; TIP, time to inflection point of grain growth; MGR, maximal grain growth rate; SGR, sustained grain growth rate; TotChl av, total flag leaf chlorophyll a and b averaged over all time points, Chla av, flag leaf chlorophyll a averaged over all time points; Chlb av, flag leaf chlorophyll b averaged over all time points; WSC, main stem water soluble carbohydrates; WSC max, peak WSC value; WSC min, minimum WSC value; WSC av, WSC content averaged over 12 all time points; MWSC, mobilized WSC; WSCME, WSC % mobilization efficiency; DW av, main stem dry weight averaged over all time points. Trait % heat response Stem segment Peduncle Penultimate internode Lower internodes