DYSPLASIA EPIPHYSIALIS MULTIPLEX IN THREE SISTERS

Similar documents
The Appendicular Skeleton

Chapter 8 The Skeletal System: The Appendicular Skeleton. Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Spondyloperipheral dysplasia

Chapter 8B. The Skeletal System: Appendicular Skeleton. The Appendicular Skeleton. Clavicle. Pectoral (Shoulder) Girdle

Pectoral (Shoulder) Girdle

Principles of Anatomy and Physiology

Important Parts of Bones

Dr.Israa H. Mohsen. Lecture 5. The vertebral column

10/12/2010. Upper Extremity. Pectoral (Shoulder) Girdle. Clavicle (collarbone) Skeletal System: Appendicular Skeleton

Introduction to Human Osteology Chapter 3: Hands and Feet

Radiographic Positioning Summary (Basic Projections RAD 222)

BLUE SKY SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL MASSAGE AND THERAPEUTIC BODYWORK. Musculoskeletal Anatomy & Kinesiology I TERMINOLOGY, STRUCTURES, & SKELETAL OVERVIEW

Lower Extremity Alignment: Genu Varum / Valgum

Chapter 6 & 7 The Skeleton

TRAINING LAB SKELETAL REMAINS: IDENTIFYING BONES NAME

Human Skeletal System Glossary

PRE-LAB EXERCISES. Before we get started, look up the definitions of these common bone marking terms: Canal: Condyle: Facet: Fissure:

The Skeletal System THE APPENDICULAR SKELETON

SKELETAL SYSTEM 206. AXIAL SKELETON 80 APPENDICULAR SKELETON 126 (see Figure 6.1) Clavicle. Clavicle. Pectoral girdles. Scapula. Scapula.

Biology 218 Human Anatomy. Adapted from Martini Human Anatomy 7th ed. Chapter 7 The Skeletal System Appendicular Division

Bio 103 Skeletal System 45

Chapter 8. The Appendicular Skeleton. Lecture Presentation by Lee Ann Frederick University of Texas at Arlington Pearson Education, Inc.

Exercise Science Section 2: The Skeletal System

Biology 218 Human Anatomy

Pediatric Fractures. Objectives. Epiphyseal Complex. Anatomy and Physiology. Ligaments. Bony matrix

HIP DYSPLASIA WITHOUT DISLOCATION IN ONE-YEAR-OLD BOYS

Figure 7: Bones of the lower limb

Chapter 8: The Appendicular Skeleton

The Appendicular Skeleton

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Basic Radiographic Principles Part II

Exercise 11. The Appendicular Skeleton

COURSE TITLE: Skeletal Anatomy and Fractures of the Lower Arm, Wrist, and Hand

Joints. Vi Michelle Austin

Hole s Human Anatomy and Physiology Eleventh Edition. Mrs. Hummer. Chapter 7 Skeletal System

Chapter 5 The Skeletal System

Skeletal System. Skeleton. Support. Function of Bones. Movement. Protection 10/15/12

Amy Warenda Czura, Ph.D. 1 SCCC BIO130 Lab 7 Appendicular Skeleton & Articulations

CHAPTER 8 LECTURE OUTLINE

The Skeletal System. Mosby items and derived items 2010, 2006, 2002, 1997, 1992 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc.

Pediatric Injuries/Fractures. Rena Heathcote

Ch. 5 - Skeletal System

Surgical Care at the District Hospital. EMERGENCY & ESSENTIAL SURGICAL CARE

G enetic disorders of the skeleton or skeletal dysplasias

UG CURRICULUM FOR ORTHOPAEDICS UNIVERSITY OF DELHI

Chapter 8. The Pectoral Girdle & Upper Limb

L01:Name and locate the major bones within the skeletal system.

Copyright 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings. Dr. Nabil Khouri MD, MSc, Ph.D

Lecture (10) Bone Fractures. Resources: - Lecture by dr.alboukai - Diagnostic imaging book

Lab Activity 9. Appendicular Skeleton Martini Chapter 8. Portland Community College BI 231

Chapter 8 The Skeletal System: The Appendicular Skeleton. Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Skeletal System. Std. VIII

Anatomy & Physiology Skeletal System Worksheet

Figure 1: Bones of the upper limb

Bone Composition. Bone is very strong for its relatively light weight The major components of bone are:

Equine Skeletal System

Chapter 7: Skeletal System

Chapter 7 /8 pgs SKELETAL TISSUES AND THE SKELETAL SYSTEM

PEM GUIDE CHILDHOOD FRACTURES

The formation of blood cells is called. hemopoiesis. What does our bone store? Where do our bones store fat? yellow marrow.

Friday Teaching. Bones

Bone Flashcards for 10a

Know all the bones of the skull, lateral view and frontal view. From the worksheets, one of the earlier ones in this unit.

Chapter 7 Skeletal System. Skeletal System: Bone Functions: Describe the role the skeletal system plays in each of the following functions.

Characteristics. Bones. Functions of the Skeleton

Overview of Anatomy and Physiology Crash Course Questions (2 pts/piece 30 In Class Points on 1 st grad in 2 nd quarter)

Appendicular Skeleton. Prof. Abdulameer Al-Nuaimi

Primary osteoathrosis of the hip and Heberden's nodes

DEPARTMENT OF ORTHOPEDICS UG Teaching Schedule. (October 2016 February 2017)

Multiple Choice Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

The Skeletal System. Chapter 7a. Skeletal System Introduction Functions of the skeleton Framework of bones The skeleton through life

Hereditary Brachydactyly Associated with Hypertension

AP1 Lab 4 - Appendicular Skeleton

Physeal fractures in immature cats and dogs: part 1 forelimbs

A NEW DINOSAUR FROM THE LANCE

Chapter 8 Outline. Pectoral Girdle Upper Limb Pelvic Girdle Lower Limb Aging of the Appendicular Skeleton Development of the Appendicular Skeleton

A. Incorrect! The appendicular skeleton includes bones of the shoulder, arm, hand, pelvis, leg and foot.

Presidency General Hospital, Calcutta

RADIOGRAPHY OF THE HAND, FINGERS & THUMB

Country Health SA Medical Imaging

MSK CT Extremities: Positioning and Reformations

Bilateral hip pain with right proximal femoral lesion

BIOMECHANICAL EXAMINATION OF THE PEDIATRIC LOWER EXTREMITY 2017

BIOMECHANICAL EXAMINATION OF THE PEDIATRIC LOWER EXTREMITY

Equine Skeletal System

NHS Training for Physiotherapy Support Workers. Workbook 11 The articular system

Types of Body Movements

External Acoustic Meatus. Mastoid Process. Zygomatic Process. Temporal Bone

Human Anatomy, First Edition McKinley & O'Loughlin

Parts of the skeletal system. Bones (skeleton) Joints Cartilages Ligaments (bone to bone)(tendon=bone to muscle)

bio4165 lab quiz 1 Posterior View Anterior View Lateral View Anterior View bio fall.quarter lab.quiz.1...page.1 of 6

Bone Classification *

RESIDUAL ADDUCTION OF THE FOREFOOT IN TREATED CONGENITAL

SKELETAL STRUCTURES Objectives for Exam #1: Objective for Portfolio #1: Part I: Skeletal Stations Station A: Bones of the Body

SKELETAL SYSTEM. Introduction Notes (pt 1)

Appendicular Skeleton. Dr. Carmen E. Rexach Anatomy 35 Mt. San Antonio College

Anatomy. Anatomy deals with the structure of the human body, and includes a precise language on body positions and relationships between body parts.

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Transcription:

DYSPLASA EPPHYSALS MULTPLEX N THREE SSTERS \\T WAUGH, LONDON, ENGLAND From the Orthopaedic Department, King s College Hospital, London Dysplasia epiphysialis multiplex, first described by Fairbank (1947), is characterised by dwarfism, stubby digits and mottling or irregularity in density and outline of the developing epiphyses. The title was introduced in order to bring into one group a number of cases which had previously been recorded under a variety of names. Fairbank s paper was based on a study of twenty patients. The purpose of this communication is to add a further three cases occurring in one generation. This in itself is hardly sufficient reason for publication, but a study of these three sisters enables comparison of the changes found at different ages to be made, and the recording of some unusual and atypical changes. The condition is said not to be familial, but in Fairbank s series are included two sisters; also quoted are two brothers (cases of Mr J. A. Cholmeley). Other cases occurring in one family were described under different titles but were considered by Fairbank to fall into his group-two sisters (Gardiner-Hill 1937), brother and sister (Barrington-Ward 1912) and a mother and twin boys (Resnick 1943). The sisters about to be described are from a family of eight children. The father, who is seventy-five years old and five feet three inches high, suffers from chronic arthritis of the rheumatoid type, but there is no radiological evidence of epiphysiaj dysplasia. The mother is five feet two inches high and also shows no evidence of the condition. The age and height of the present generation of eight children are shown in Table. TABLE AGE AND HEGHT OF EGHT SBLNGS (The affected sisters are indicated by heavy type) Age Height Theresa 44 years 3 feet 5 inches Anne 9 years 4 feet 54 inches Keith 12 years 5 feet 2 inches Malcolm 14 years 5 feet 4 inches Sheila 15 years 4 feet 74 inches Robert 164 years 5 feet 9 inches Mary 18 years 5 feet 4 inches Roberta 19 years 5 feet 0 inches t will be seen that the affected sisters are short compared with the other members of their family. This shortness does not amount to dwarfism, but is sufficiently obvious to enable them to be picked out from their brothers and sisters (Fig. 1). The other obvious features which distinguish them are the short stubby hands and feet (Figs. 2 and 3) and the fact that they all have cleft palates. t is difficult to relate the last finding to their general condition and it is possibly only an interesting coincidence. 82 THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JONT SURGERY

DYSPLASA EPPHYSALS MULTPLEX N THREE SSTERS 83 FG. 1 Group of four sisters. Left to right: Anne (nine years) a normal sister for comparison, Sheila (fifteen years), Roberta (nineteen years) and Theresa (four and a half years). FG. 2 Figure 2-Sheila s hands showing the characteristic short and stubby fingers. Figure 3-Sheila s legs. The genu valgum was later corrected by a supracondylar osteotomy of the right femur. FG. 3 VOL. 34 B, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 1952

84 w. WAUGH Of the three, Sheila has the severest deformities, and she was brought to hospital because of right genu valgum (Fig. 3). This was satisfactorily corrected by a supracondylar osteotomy of the femur in 1949. When Sheila was under observation the opportunity was taken to investigate the other members of the family. RADOGRAPHC FNDNGS While epiphysial changes characteristic of the condition are found to a varying degree in all three sisters, there is one striking feature which differs from the description given by Fairbank. He states that the centres of ossification for the epiphyses may be late in appearing and backward in development and fusion with the shaft may be delayed. n our cases the epiphyses have appeared early and fused early, and a study of the bone detail in the radiographs shows a remarkable degree of maturity for their age. For example, the radiograph of Theresa s hand at four and a half years (Fig. 9) shows a bone age of at least seven years, as indicated by the appearances of the carpal centres. And the radiographs of Sheila s hips at the age of fourteen years (Fig. 5) show fusion of the capital and trochanteric epiphyses, which normally does not occur until the age of eighteen years. This suggests that the relative shortness of these girls may be due to early epiphysial fusion rather than delay in development. Fairbank, however, emphasised that the principal change is irregularity in ossification, and these three sisters do show almost all the typical features in this respect. Hips-n Theresa s case the capital epiphyses are flattened, narrow and irregularly developed (Fig. 4). The neck of the femur is widened and there is coxa vara. The general bony development in advance of her age (four and a half years) can be noted. Sheila s hips (Fig. 5) show a similar abnormality of the femoral head occurring at a later period of growth. Roberta shows the changes to a lesser degree (Fig. 6). The short neck and the beaking of the greater trochanter are seen. Knees-Sheila alone has an abnormality of the lower femoral epiphysis causing the knock-knee for which she was treated. The patella on this side is absent. Abnormality in the growth of this bone is also found in the other two sisters. n Figure 7 (Theresa) the precocious and irregular development of the patellar epiphysis can be seen. Ankles-The characteristic obliquity of the joint line is not present, but a flattening of the superior articular surface of the talus in the lateral view is seen in all three sisters. Feet-The abnormalities of the tarsus and the stunted metatarsals are well shown in Figure 8. Hands- The metacarpals are broad and short, especially in Sheila s left hand (Fig. 11). The fourth metacarpal is stunted ; it is interesting to note that this finger is not relatively short owing to an increase in length in the proximal phalanx. n Theresa s hand (Fig. 9) the developing epiphyses of the proximal phalanges are narrow and dense. Roberta s hand (Fig. 10) shows less obvious changes than her sisters, but there is a relative overgrowth of the lower end of the ulna. Elbows-Sheila s elbows (Fig. 12) show the unusual shape of the lower end of the humerus and head of the radius. n Theresa s elbows at the age of four and a half years the epiphysis of the capitulum, which normally appears at two years, is not yet present. This suggests that the forward subluxation of the radial head is due to lack of development of the capitulum in Sheila s case as well. t may be noted that it is only around the elbow that epiphysial development is delayed; elsewhere it is premature. Shoulders-The distinctive abnormality in the shape of the head of the humerus is not present in any of the sisters. Apart from some flattening of the lumbar vertebral bodies in Sheila, a full radiographic survey of the three sisters showed no abnormalities other than those described. DSCUSSON These three sisters show changes in the epiphyses of the long bones which are sufficiently typical to allow a diagnosis of dysplasia epiphysialis multiplex to be made. t is, however, important to note that there is some variation from Fairbank s described pattern in that the THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JONT SURGERY

DYSPLAS. EPPHYSALS MULTPLEX N THREE SSTERS 85 L FG. 4 FG. 5 FG. 6 Figure 4-Theresa s left hip. The capital epiphvsis is flattened, narrow and irregularly developed. The neck is widened and there is coxa vara. Note the maturity of bony development. Figure 5-Sheila s left hip showing an abnormahtv like Theresa s, hut at a later period of growth. Figure 6-Roberta s left hip which shows some flattening of the femoral head, but the changes are less marked than in the younger slsters. FG. 7 FG. 8 Figure 7-Theresa s left knee, showing the thin and irregularly developed patella. Figure 8-Sheila s right foot, showing the short, stunted metatarsals. The broadness of the first metatarsal and proximal phalanx is striking. VOL. 34B, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 1952

86 W. WAUGH FG. 9 FG. 10 Figure 9-Theresa s right hand. The typical shape of the metacarpals s shown. The epiphyses of the proximal phalanges are narrowed and dense. The development of the ossific centres for the carpus is in advance of her age (four and a half years). Figure 10- Roberta s left hand. The stunted metacarpals are typical, hut the changes are not so advanced as in the younger sisters. There is overgrowth of the lower end of the nna. FG. 12 Figure 11-Sheila s left hand. The stunting of the metacarpals is present, the changes being most obvious in the fourth. The middle phalanges are short and broad. Figure 12- Sheila s right elbow, showing the abnormal shape of the capitulum and the consequent subluxation of the radial head. THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JONT SURGERY

DYSPLASA EPPHYSALS MULTPLEX N THREE SSTERS 87 epiphyses have appeared early and fused early. This is a substantial difference, but since it is impossible to make sharp distinctions in classifications of growth abnormalities it seems correct to include them under this title. A point of practical importance in consideration of this condition is the suggestion that the changes in the femoral heads may be misinterpreted as pseudocoxalgia. Although there may be radiological similarities at certain stages of the disease, confusion should not arise on clinical grounds. n no case of dysplasia epiphysialis multiplex have there been noted any symptoms referable to these changes. This is confirmed by the three sisters who have never had pain in the hips or limp and who, at their various ages, have full hip movements. t may also be reasonably deduced that in these hips there is a tendency towards improvement without treatment. t is, of course, possible that the sisters may have been affected in varying degrees from the onset, but on the other hand a study of the radiographs suggests that they show serial changes which are most obvious during the period of active growth. n any event, it is submitted that treatment, in the form of relief from weight-bearing, is unnecessary and should not be contemplated because of the radiographic appearances. Moreover, if dysplasia epiphysialis multiplex is diagnosed early in life there should be no need to give the parents a dismal prognosis, for dwarfism is seldom severe, deformity has been troublesome only in a small proportion of the reported cases, and function is invariably good. My thanks are due to Mr St J. D. Buxton, under whose care the sisters were, for his help and encouragement in the preparation of this paper. REFERENCES BARRNGTON-WARD, L. E. (1912): Double Coxa Vara with other Deformities occurring in Brother and Sister. Lancet, i, 157. FARBANK, T. (1947): Dysplasia Epiphysialis Multiplex. British Journal of Surgery, 34, 225. GARDNER-HLL, H. (1937): Abnormalities of Growth and Development. British Medical Journal, 1, 1241. RESNCK, E. (1943): Epiphysial Dysplasia Punctata in a Mother and dentical Male Twins. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 25, 461. VOL. 34 B, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 1952