LCZ696 A First-in-Class Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor

Similar documents
Satish K Surabhi, MD.FACC,FSCAI,RPVI Medical Director, Cardiac Cath Labs AnMed Health Heart & Vascular Care

Disclosures for Presenter

Overview & Update on the Utilization of the Natriuretic Peptides in Heart Failure

Disclosure of Relationships

2017 Summer MAOFP Update

UPDATES IN MANAGEMENT OF HF

Drugs acting on the reninangiotensin-aldosterone

Systolic Dysfunction Clinical /Hemodynamic Guide for Management From Neprilysin Inhibitors to Ivabradine

From PARADIGM-HF to Clinical Practice. Waleed AlHabeeb, MD, MHA Associate Professor of Medicine President of the Saudi Heart Failure Group

Beyond ACE-inhibitors for Heart Failure. Jacob Townsend, MD NCVH Birmingham 2015

ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR-NEPRILYSIN INHIBITORS IN HEART FAILURE FROM CHD

Mihai Gheorghiade MD

The Myths of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction:

Outline. Classification by LVEF Conventional Therapy New Therapies. Ivabradine Sacubitril/valsartan

ARxCH. Annual Review of Changes in Healthcare. Entresto: An Overview for Pharmacists

Heart Failure: Current Management Strategies

Highlight Session Heart failure and cardiomyopathies Michel KOMAJDA Paris France

Diagnosis is it really Heart Failure?

Updates in Congestive Heart Failure

Entresto Development of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Heart Failure in Women: Dr Goh Ping Ping Cardiologist Asian Heart & Vascular Centre

The ACC Heart Failure Guidelines

Treating HF Patients with ARNI s Why, When and How?

9/10/ , American Heart Association 2

Heart Failure Clinician Guide JANUARY 2016

2/15/2017. Disclosures. Heart Failure = Big Problem. Heart Failure Update Reducing Hospitalizations and Improving Patient Outcomes 02/18/2017

HEART FAILURE: PHARMACOTHERAPY UPDATE

Akash Ghai MD, FACC February 27, No Disclosures

Heart Failure. Subjective SOB (shortness of breath) Peripheral edema. Orthopnea (2-3 pillows) PND (paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea)

ACE inhibitors: still the gold standard?

Therapeutic Targets and Interventions

The Therapeutic Potential of Novel Approaches to RAAS. Professor of Medicine University of California, San Diego

INIBITORI NEPRILISINA

Μαρία Μπόνου Διευθύντρια ΕΣΥ, ΓΝΑ Λαϊκό

Disclosures. Advances in Chronic Heart Failure Management 6/12/2017. Van N Selby, MD UCSF Advanced Heart Failure Program June 19, 2017

ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure

1/4/18. Heart Failure Guideline Review and Update. Disclosure. Pharmacist Objectives. Pharmacy Technician Objectives. What is Heart Failure?

SGK 2016 Session: Postgraduate Course in Heart Failure Lausanne, 15. June 2016 Heart Failure Guidelines 2016

Heart Failure Clinician Guide JANUARY 2018

Pravin Manga Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of Witwatersrand

2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA HF guidelines. Advances in the Use of Biomarkers in Heart Failure Patients. Outline

Disclosures. Overview. Goal statement. Advances in Chronic Heart Failure Management 5/22/17

HFpEF. April 26, 2018

What s New in Heart Failure? Marie-France Gauthier, BSc, PharmD, ACPR Clinical Pharmacist at Montfort Hospital

New Paradigms in Rx of Symptomati Heart Failure:Role of Ivabradine & Angiotensin Neprilysin Inhibition

Sacubitril/valsartan: A New Management Strategy for the Treatment of Heart Failure. Elizabeth Pogge, PharmD, MPH, BCPS, FASCP

New Trials. Iain Squire. Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Leicester. Chair, BSH

Congestive Heart Failure: Outpatient Management

Management of chronic heart failure: pharmacology. Giuseppe M.C. Rosano, MD, PhD, FHFA

Systolic Dysfunction Clinical/Hemodynamic Guide for Management; New Medical and Interventional Therapeutic Challenges

Treatment Of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone antagonist (TOPCAT) AHA Nov 18, 2014 Update on Randomized Trials

HFpEF 2016 : Comorbidities and Outcomes

HFpEF, Mito or Realidad?

Aldosterone Antagonism in Heart Failure: Now for all Patients?

Management of chronic heart failure: update J. Parissis Attikon University Hospital

LCZ696: LA NUOVA RIVOLUZIONE NELLA TERAPIA DELLO SCOMPENSO CARDIACO. Dario Leosco Università di Napoli Federico II

HF-Preserved Ejection Fraction

Vitals HR 90 BP 125/58 Tmax 98.7F O2 Sat 97% on NC 2L/min BMP SCr 1.78 K 3.9 Gluc 194 A1c 7.5 Cardiac LVEF 55% NTproBNP 9,200 Troponin 0.

New horizons in HF: potential of new drugs

Nitrate s Effect on Activity Tolerance in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (NEAT) A Randomized Clinical Trial

Behandeling van Hartfalen: over 5 jaar

ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure

Dr Dinna Soon. Consultant Cardiologist, Department of Cardiology. GP symposium 2 April 2016

ECG in CRT patients & novel HF therapies. Δημήτριος M. Κωνσταντίνου Ειδικός Καρδιολόγος, MD, MSc, PhD, CCDS Πανεπιστημιακός Υπότροφος

Evidence of Baroreflex Activation Therapy s Mechanism of Action

Sacubitril/Valsartan in HFrEF for All Protagonist View George Honos MD FRCPC FCCS FACC

Heart Failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)

DISCLOSURES ACHIEVING SUCCESS THROUGH FAILURE: UPDATE ON HEART FAILURE WITH PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION NONE

New Winners in the World of Heart Failure. Laura Steffens PharmD Candidate 2016 CICU Presentation August 12, 2015

OTE HAR M A. Sacubitril/Valsartan (Entresto ): A New Dual Therapy Approved For Chronic Heart Failure. Vol. 31, Issue 3 December 2015.

Faiez Zannad. Institut Lorrain du Coeur et des Vaisseaux. CIC - Inserm

THE PROPER APPROACH TO DIAGNOSING HEART FAILURE WITH PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION

Practical considerations for the use of ARNI in CHF: clinical cases. J. Parissis, Heart Failure Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Online Appendix (JACC )

Introduction to Heart Failure. Mauricio Velez, M.D. Transplant Cardiologist APACVS 2018 April 5-7 Miami, FL

Heart Failure Update. Bibiana Cujec MD May 2015

Effect of Aliskiren on Postdischarge Outcomes Among Non-Diabetic Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: Insights from the ASTRONAUT Outcomes Trial

Combination of renin-angiotensinaldosterone. how to choose?

Neprilysin Inhibitor (Entresto ) Prior Authorization and Quantity Limit Program Summary

Comparing nebivolol and spironolactone in the treatment of heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction

Heart Failure: Guideline-Directed Management and Therapy

Summary/Key Points Introduction

Heart Failure New Drugs- Updated Guidelines

CADTH CANADIAN DRUG EXPERT COMMITTEE FINAL RECOMMENDATION

Angiotensin Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

State-of-the-Art Management of Chronic Systolic Heart Failure

Heart Failure (HF) Treatment

Updates in Heart Failure (HF) 2016: ACC / AHA and ESC

2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure

Checklist for Treating Heart Failure. Alan M. Kaneshige MD, FACC, FASE Oklahoma Heart Institute

Heart Failure: Combination Treatment Strategies

A new class of drugs for systolic heart failure: The PARADIGM-HF study

Value of echocardiography in chronic dyspnea

Improving outcomes in heart failure with reduced EF

Definition of Congestive Heart Failure

TERAPIA DELLO SCOMPENSO DAI BETA- BLOCCANTI AGLI ARNI (ARNI SI ARNI NO) Iseo 10 Novembre 2018

Disclosure Statement. Heart Failure: Refreshers and Updates. Objectives. CHF: Chronic Heart Failure. Definitions. Definitions 2/19/2018

AHA Nov 18, 2013 Late Breaking Session

HEART FAILURE. Heart Failure in the US. Heart Failure (HF) 3/2/2014

The Failing Heart in Primary Care

Transcription:

The Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor LCZ696 in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction The Prospective comparison of ARNI with ARB on Management Of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (PARAMOUNT) Trial Scott D. Solomon, MD, Michael Zile, MD, Burkert Pieske, MD, Adriaan Voors, MD, Amil Shah, MD, Elisabeth Kraigher-Krainer, MD, Victor Shi, MD, Toni Bransford, MD, Madoka Takeuchi, MS, Jianjian Gong, PhD, Martin Lefkowitz, MD, Milton Packer, MD, John J.V. McMurray, MD for the PARAMOUNT Investigators

Disclosures Drs. Solomon, Zile, Pieske, Voors, Shah, Packer and McMurray have received research support and have consulted for Novartis. Drs. Shi, Bransford, Lefkowitz and Gong are employees of Novartis. Dr. Kraigher-Krainer and Ms. Takeuchi have no conflicts to report.

Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for up to half of heart failure cases, and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Pharmacologic therapies that have been tested in clinical trials include beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers; to date no therapies have been shown to improve clinical outcomes in this condition. Several pathophysiologic mechanisms have been implicated in this disorder, including abnormalities of diastolic function and impaired natriuretic response to acute volume expansion.

LCZ696 A First-in-Class Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor Natriuretic Peptide System Heart Failure Renin Angiotensin System pro-bnp Angiotensinogen (liver secretion) BNP NT-pro BNP LCZ696 Angiotensin I Angiotensin II Inactive fragments Neprilysin X Vasodilation blood pressure sympathetic tone aldosterone levels fibrosis hypertrophy Natriuresis/Diuresis H N O H O O O H AHU377 LBQ657 O O O N OH N N NH N Valsartan X AT 1 receptor Vasoconstriction blood pressure sympathetic tone aldosterone fibrosis hypertrophy 4

Objectives and Hypothesis The PARAMOUNT trial was designed to test the safety and efficacy of LCZ696 in patients with HFpEF. We hypothesized that LCZ696 would reduce NT-proBNP to a greater extent than the ARB valsartan at 12 weeks, and would be associated with favorable changes in cardiac structure and function at 36 weeks

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Key Inclusion Criteria Age 40 years Documented stable chronic heart failure (NYHA II-IV) with signs and symptoms of heart failure (Dyspnea on exertion/ Orthopnea/ Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea/ Peripheral edema) LVEF 45% Key Exclusion Criteria Patients with a prior LVEF reading <45%, at ANY time Patients who require treatment with both an ACE inhibitor and an ARB Isolated right heart failure due to pulmonary disease Plasma NT-proBNP > 400 pg/ml at screening (Visit 1) On diuretic therapy prior to Visit 1, controlled systolic BP (<140 mm Hg, or BP <160 mm Hg if on 3 meds) egfr 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (MDRD) Dyspnea and/or edema from non-cardiac causes, such as lung disease, anemia, or severe obesity Presence of valvular heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, infiltrative cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, or pericardial disease Patients with a potassium 5.2 mmol/l at Visit 1 Coronary disease requiring revascularization during the study

PARAMOUNT: Study Design Placebo run-in LCZ696 50 mg BID LCZ696 100 mg BID LCZ696 200 mg BID Discontinue ACEI or ARB therapy one day prior to randomization Valsartan 40 mg BID Valsartan 80 mg BID Valsartan 160 mg BID Prior ACEi/ARB use discontinued Week Visit -2 1 2 weeks 0 2 1 2 3 4 1 week 1 week 10 weeks 4 8 12 18 24 30 36 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6 month extension Primary objective NT pro-bnp reduction from baseline at 12 weeks Secondary objectives Echocardiographic measures of diastolic function, left atrial size, LV size and function, PASP HF symptoms, Clinical composite assessment and Quality of life (KCCQ) Safety and tolerability Baseline randomization visit and visit at end of 12 weeks of core study Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00887588

Statistical Analysis A sample size of 290 patients ensured at least 80% power to detect a 25% reduction in NT pro-bnp vs comparator Primary endpoint (NT-proBNP) was evaluated as the ratio of the 12 week to baseline log-transformed NT-proBNP, and data are presented as geometric means We performed a last observation carried forward analysis, as well as a completers only analysis and multiple imputation for missing values as sensitivity analyses. All analyses of primary and secondary endpoints were adjusted for baseline values, and for the stratification strata (region and prior ACE/ARB use).

Patient Flow 685 patients screened 7 patients excluded from analyses for major GCP violations 308 patients randomized LCZ696 200 mg, n=149 (100%) patients Valsartan 160 mg, n=152 (100%) patients 12-week double-blind main period 130 (87.2%) completed 12 weeks 131 (86.2%) completed 12 weeks 24-week double-blind extension period 121 (81.2%) completed 36 weeks 120 (78.9%) completed 36 weeks

Baseline Characteristics Baseline Characteristic LCZ696 Valsartan N=149 N=152 Mean age 70.9 (9.4) 71.2 (8.9) Female gender (n, %) 57% 56% NYHA class History of prior heart failure hospitalization (n, %) Class II (%) 81% 78% Class III (%) 19% 21% 40% 45% Atrial Fibrillation at Screening (n, %) 27% 30% History of Hypertension (n, %) 95% 92% History of Diabetes (n, %) 41% 35% egfr < 60 (%) 38% 45% SBP/DBP median (interquartile range) 136 (130,145) / 80 (74, 85) 136 (126, 145) / 78 (70, 84) NT-ProBNP geometric mean (95% CI) 794 (681, 925) 870 (740, 1022)

Baseline Characteristics (2) Baseline Medications LCZ696 Valsartan ACE Inhibitors (n, %) 56% 53% ARBs (n, %) 38% 41% ACE inhibitors or ARBs (n, %) 93% 93% Diuretics (n, %) 100% 100% Beta-Blockers (n, %) 79% 80% Aldosterone Antagonists (n, %) 19% 23% Baseline Echocardiographic Measures Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (%) 58 (7.3) 58 (8.1) Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction 76% 82% 50% Lateral Mitral Relaxation Velocity (E ) 7.8 (2.7) 7.3 (2.9) (cm/s) Mitral Inflow to Mitral Relaxation 12.4 (8.1) 13.0 (7.0) Velocity Ratio (E/E ) Left Atrial Dimension (cm) 3.7 (0.45) 3.7 (0.54) Left Atrial Volume (ml) 65.6 (22.7) 67.4 (28.4) Left Ventricular mass (g) 145 (40.5) 150 (43.8)

NTproBNP (pg/ml) Primary Endpoint: NT-proBNP at 12 Weeks 1000 900 800 862 (733,1012) 835 (710, 981) Valsartan 700 600 LCZ696 500 400 300 783 (670,914) p = 0.063 LCZ696/Valsartan: 0.77 (0.64, 0.92) P = 0.005 605 (512, 714) 200 0 5 10 12 Weeks Post Randomization

Similar Treatment Effect in All Predefined Subgroups Interaction P-Value Age 65 Age < 65 Female Male SBP > 140 SBP 140 egfr 60 egfr < 60 Diabetes (no) Diabetes (yes) EF 50 EF < 50 Atrial Fibrillation (no) Atrial Fibrillation (yes) Prior HF hospitalization (no) Prior HF Hospitalization (Yes) NYHA Class III NYHA class II NTproBNP median NTproBNP > median n = 207 n = 59 n = 114 n = 152 n = 88 n = 178 n = 153 n = 109 n = 170 n = 96 n = 217 n = 31 n = 190 n = 76 n = 158 n = 108 n = 50 n = 214 n = 132 n = 134 P = 0.57 P = 0.69 P = 0.07 P = 0.18 P = 0.02 P = 0.49 P = 0.85 P = 0.62 P = 0.70 P = 0.57 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Ratio NT-ProBNP LCZ696/Valsartan Favors LCZ696 Favors Valsartan

NTproBNP (pg/ml) Change in NT-proBNP over 36 weeks 1000 900 800 Valsartan 700 600 500 400 300 p = 0.063 p = 0.005 p = 0.20 LCZ696 200 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Weeks Post Randomization

Change in Blood Pressure (mm Hg) Blood Pressure Reduction 0-1 12 weeks 36 weeks SBP DBP SBP DBP -2-3 -4 LCZ696 VALSARTAN -5-6 -7-8 -9-10 P = 0.001 P = 0.09 P = 0.006 P = 0.001 Note: Change in BP correlated poorly with change in NT-proBNP (r = 0.104, p=0.1). After adjustment for change in BP, the reduction in NT-proBNP between groups remained statistically significant (p=0.01).

Change in E/E' Change in Lateral Mitral Annular Relaxation Velocity (E') (cm/s) Change in Left Atrial Volume (ml) Change in LA Width (cm) Changes in Key Echocardiographic Measures Left Atrial Volume Left Atrial Width 2 12 Weeks 36 Weeks 0.00 12 weeks 36 weeks 1 LCZ696 Valsartan 0-0.05-1 -2-0.10-3 -4-0.15-5 -6 P = 0.18 P = 0.003 E/E -0.20 2.0 P = 0.07 P = 0.03 0.0-0.2 12 Weeks 36 Weeks 1.5 Lateral E P = 0.40-0.4-0.6 1.0 P = 0.56-0.8-1.0-1.2 0.5-1.4-1.6-1.8-2.0 P = 0.71 P = 0.42 0.0 12 weeks 36 weeks No Significant Changes in LV volumes, Ejection Fraction, or LV mass at 12 or 36 weeks

Percent of Patients Change in NYHA Class Worsened Unchanged Improved 110 100 P = 0.11 P = 0.05 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 LCZ696 Valsartan LCZ696 Valsartan Week 12 Week 36

Adverse Events and Laboratory Values Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) LCZ696 (n=149) Valsartan (n=152) p-value 22 (15%) 30 (20%) 0.32 Deaths 1 (0.7%) 2 (1.3%) 0.99 All Cardiac 9 (6.0%) 12(7.9%) 0.69 Heart Failure 4 (2.7%) 6 (3.9%) 0.77 Any Adverse Event (AE) 96 (64%) 111 (73%) 0.14 Adverse events of Interest Symptomatic Hypotension 28 (19%) 27 (18%) 0.88 Renal Dysfunction 3 (2.0%) 7 (4.6%) 0.34 Hyperkalemia 12 (8.1%) 9 (5.9%) 0.50 Abnormal Laboratory Values Potassium > 5.5 24 (16%) 16 (11%) 0.21 Potassium 6.0 5 (3.4%) 6 (4.2%) 0.97 50% decrease in egfr 5 (3.4%) 4 (2.8%) 0.98

Conclusions We found that in patients with HFpEF, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 reduced NT-proBNP, a marker associated with worse outcomes in HFpEF, to a greater extent than valsartan after 12 weeks of therapy. This reduction became evident at 4 weeks and was sustained to 36 weeks, though the between group difference was no longer significant. We further observed a reduction in left atrial size, indicative of reverse left atrial remodeling, and improvement in NYHA class in patients randomized to LCZ696 after 36 weeks, compared with those randomized to valsartan. LCZ696 was well tolerated. These hypothesis generating findings suggest that LCZ696 may have beneficial effects in patients with HFpEF and that further testing of this compound may be warranted in patients with this condition.

www.lancet.com