Targeting Interventions by Risk, Need, Responsivity DOUGLAS B. MARLOWE, JD, PHD

Similar documents
Targeting Interventions by Risk, Need, Responsivity DOUGLAS B. MARLOWE, JD, PHD

Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Chief of Science, Law & Policy. National Association of Drug Court Professionals

MCJRP 2016 Evolving Evidence Based Practice. LOCAL PUBLIC SAFETY COORDINATING COUNCIL May 3, 2016

TRI science. addiction

Incentives and Sanctions Responses to Client Behavior

Assessing Risk for Persons with Behavioral Health Needs Involved in the Criminal Justice System

National Drug Court Institute. Drug Court Training. Presented by: Judge Phyllis McMillen & Jessica Parks

Welcome! High-Risk High-Need. Means for. Exploring What. Matching Service to Need. Family Drug Courts. Nancy K. Young, PhD. Doug Marlowe, JD, PhD

Revisiting Phases in Adult & DWI Treatment Courts

An Overview of Risk-Needs- Responsivity Model: Application to Behavioral Health Populations

Shaping Behavior. Incentives and Sanctions

Shaping Behavior. Incentives and Sanctions. The Challenge

A Foundation for Evidence-Based Justice Decisions

A Foundation for Evidence-Based Justice Decisions

Kevin Knight, Ph.D., Associate Director Science of Addiction & Evidenced-Based Treatment

Community-based sanctions

The Cost of Imprisonment

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DRUG COURT. An Overview

9. In comparing the relative toxicity of marijuana and cocaine, it is important to take into account A. the user's gender. B. availability and price.

Juvenile Pre-Disposition Evaluation: Reliability and Validity

Pennsylvania Client Placement Criteria, Third Edition 3B or 3C. PA Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs

Courts and Jails. Evidence-Based Judicial Decision Making

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Understanding Drug Abuse and Addiction: What Science Says

Colorado Sex Offender Management Board

Hennepin County Drug Court & Change the Outcome

E-Career Counseling for Offender Re-entry

GOVERNMENT OF BERMUDA Ministry of Culture and Social Rehabilitation THE BERMUDA DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAMME

What Is Heroin? Examples of Opioids. What Science Says about Opioid Use Disorder and Its Treatment 6/27/2016

Medication-Assisted Treatment. What Is It and Why Do We Use It?

SAQ-Adult Probation III: Normative Study

Brief History of Methadone Maintenance Treatment

Oriana House, Inc. Substance Abuse Treatment. Community Corrections. Reentry Services. Drug & Alcohol Testing. Committed to providing programming

Forensic Counselor Education Course

Tri-Occurring supervision in the criminal Justice System


Chad Sabora, BS, MS, JD Missouri Network for Opiate Reform and Recovery. Drug Policy, Harm Reduction, and What s Next

PSYCHOLOGY PAPER - I. Foundations of Psychology. 1. Introduction:

Problem-Solving Courts : A Brief History. The earliest problem-solving court was a Drug Court started in Miami-Dade County, FL in 1989

ROSC & MAT II: Opioid Treatment Services

Challenges of Adolescence. Chapter 11 - Adolescence

Incentives. Standard 17: Applying Incentives and Sanctions See section 10 of binder. Principles of Behavior Modification. Learning Objectives:

SAQ-Short Form Reliability and Validity Study in a Large Sample of Offenders

gatewaycorrections.org TCU & Gateway Foundation 9/23/2014 Disclosures Topics Covered Opioid Use Disorders & the CJ System

EFFECTIVE PROGRAM PRINCIPLES MATRIX

probation, number of parole revocations, DVI Alcohol Scale scores, DVI Control Scale scores, and DVI Stress Coping Abilities Scale scores.

Angie Boarman Forensic Treatment Program Manager FSSA Division of Mental Health and Addiction

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RESULTS FIRST PROGRAM INVENTORY Revised March 16, 2017

Are Drug Treatment Programs in Prison Effective in Reducing Recidivism Rates?

California's incarceration rate increased 52 percent in the last 20 years.

Chapter 13. Types of Drugs and Their Effects. Unit 5: Drug Use and Abuse. Key Terms. What Are Drugs?

UNGALUK FUNDING PROGRAM INFORMATION

PRESENTED BY: DANNY LANGLOSS, JR. (RET.) CHIEF OF POLICE DIXON POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY MANAGER CITY OF DIXON (RET.) VICE PRESIDENT ILLINOIS

COMPLIMENTARY TREATMENT STANDARD VI SOCIAL SERVICES AND

Care Team Training. Key Components of Collaborative Care. Collaborative Team Approach 4/21/2014 PCP. Core Program. New Roles. Psychiatric Consultant

LEWIS COUNTY COURT DRUG COURT

Specialty Courts, Detention Diversion, and Best Practices

JUSTICE REINVESTMENT: FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY-CENTERED OFFENDER REHABILITATION. Hon. Frank L. Racek

Addictions 101: Understanding, Recognizing, and Treating the Disease State!

Essex County Sheriff Department s Detoxification Unit Guide

Opioids Research to Practice

ADULT Addictions Treatment: Medically Monitored Residential Treatment (3B)

VISTA COLLEGE ONLINE CAMPUS

Trauma Addiction & Criminal Justice. Introduction. Overview of Presentation 9/15/14. Diagnosis & Treatment. ! Winford Amos, LPC, LAC, CCS

Treatment Alternatives for Substance Use Disorders

DMHAS ASAM SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS

SW OREGON OPIOID SUMMIT. Medication Assisted Recovery for Opioid Use Disorder. Gregory S. Brigham, Ph.D. Adapt / SouthRiver CHC / Compass

Pharmacotherapy for opioid addiction. Judith Martin, MD Medical Director BAART Turk Street Clinic San Francisco

Shoplifting Inventory: Standardization Study

Maximizing the Impact of Interventions for Youth: The Importance of Risk/Needs Assessment

LONG TERM PHARMACOTHERAPY OF OPIOID DEPENDENCE

Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs


Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice. Justice Reinvestment Presentation #1 September 12, 2018

IDDT Fidelity Action Planning Guidelines

Clover Court Permanent Supportive Housing Project. Luke-Dorf Inc. Community Presentation

D. Weisburd et al. (eds.), What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation,

Assessing Risk. October 22, Tammy Meredith, Ph.D. Applied Research Services, Inc.

HEALTHIER LIVES, STRONGER FAMILIES, SAFER COMMUNITIES:

Fourth Generation Risk Assessment and Prisoner Reentry. Brian D. Martin. Brian R. Kowalski. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Trauma Informed Care for Youth & The VCC Trauma Recovery Program for Youth

Eric L. Sevigny, University of South Carolina Harold A. Pollack, University of Chicago Peter Reuter, University of Maryland

Violence by Youth in Norway. Recent Cases

Part 115 PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT NATIONAL STANDARDS Published June 20, 2012

Berks County Treatment Courts

Sexual Adjustment Inventory

Improving Outcomes in Methadone Treatment

HARM REDUCTION LAUREN PREST ADDICTION PSYCHIATRY FELLOW 2018 UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2018

Welcome to the Wood Pilot Project

7/7/2016 Journal of the American Medical Association,

The science of the mind: investigating mental health Treating addiction

Contents Opioid Treatment Program Core Program Standards... 2

C U YA H O G A C O U N T Y

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

The Current view syndrome

APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO ESTABLISH A DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAM SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA

*p <.05; **p <.01; ***p <.001; p-value not reported. King County, WA. Baltimore, MD. Jackson County, OR. Marion County, OR.

MAT in the Corrections Setting

Melanie Cotter, M.A., LPC, CCM

Transcription:

Targeting Interventions by Risk, Need, Responsivity DOUGLAS B. MARLOWE, JD, PHD

Risk Principle Not necessarily a risk for violence or dangerousness Complicated progsis or lesser amenability to treatment Risk level intensity of supervision and vice versa Mixing risk levels is contraindicated

Progstic Risk Factors Current age < 25 years Delinquent onset < 16 years Substance abuse onset < 14 years Prior rehabilitation failures Prior felony convictions or incarceration History of violence Antisocial Personality Disorder or Psychopathy Familial history of crime or addiction Criminal or substance abuse associations

Need Principle Clinical syndromes or impairments (diagsis) Cause crime ( crimigenic ) or interfere with rehabilitation ( responsivity ) Addiction is crimigenic and mental illness can interfere with response to rehabilitation Need level intensity of treatment and vice versa Mixing need levels is contraindicated

Risk & Needs Matrix High Needs Low Needs High Risk Supervision Treatment Pro-social habilitation Adaptive habilitation Supervision Pro-social habilitation (Adaptive habilitation) Low Risk Treatment (Pro-social rehabilitation) Adaptive rehabilitation Secondary prevention Diversion

Shaping Behavior Don t expect too much Learned helplessness, ratio burden, ceiling effects Don t expect too little Habituation, complacency Proximal vs. distal goals Phase specificity What was once distal becomes proximal

Specific Responsivity All needs are t created equal Order and timing of intervention is critical: 1. Responsivity needs: interfere with rehabilitation 2. Crimigenic needs: cause or exacerbate crime 3. Maintenance needs: degrade rehabilitation gains 4. Humanitarian needs: cause distress

Phase Structure Type 1 Case Responsivity 18 24 mos. 200 hrs. Continuing Care 1. Housing assistance 2. Stabilize cravings, withdrawal, anhedonia 3. Mental health tx Crimigenic 1. Vocational or educational counseling & assistance 2. Therapy / recovery *3. Medical or dental tx *4. HIV/STD prevention *5. Overdose prevention & reversal *Humanitarian Needs 1. Addiction treatment 2. Delinquent peer affiliations 3. Pro-social regimen; structure 1. Criminal thinking 2. Adaptive problem-solving Maintenance

Phase Structure Responsivity 12 18 mos. ~ 150 hrs. Continuing Care 1. Housing assistance 2. Stabilize cravings, withdrawal, anhedonia 3. Mental health tx Crimigenic 1. Vocational or educational counseling & assistance 2. Therapy / recovery *3. Medical or dental tx *4. HIV/STD prevention *5. Overdose prevention & reversal *Humanitarian Needs 1. Addiction treatment 2. Delinquent peer affiliations 3. Pro-social regimen; structure 1. Criminal thinking 2. Adaptive problem-solving Maintenance Type 2 Case

Phase Structure Responsivity ~ 12 mos. ~ 100 hrs. Continuing Care 1. Housing assistance 2. Stabilize cravings, withdrawal, anhedonia 3. Mental health tx Crimigenic 1. Vocational or educational counseling & assistance 2. Therapy / recovery *3. Medical or dental tx *4. HIV/STD prevention *5. Overdose prevention & reversal *Humanitarian Needs 1. Addiction treatment 2. Delinquent peer affiliations 3. Pro-social regimen; structure 1. Criminal thinking 2. Adaptive problem-solving Maintenance Type 3 Case

Phase Structure Responsivity 6-12 mos. ~ 50-100 hrs. Continuing Care 1. Housing assistance 2. Stabilize cravings, withdrawal, anhedonia 3. Mental health tx Crimigenic 1. Vocational or educational counseling & assistance 2. Therapy / recovery *3. Medical or dental tx *4. HIV/STD prevention *5. Overdose prevention & reversal *Humanitarian Needs 1. Addiction treatment 2. Delinquent peer affiliations 3. Pro-social regimen; structure 1. Criminal thinking 2. Adaptive problem-solving Maintenance Type 4 Case

Phase Structure Responsivity 1. Housing assistance 2. Stabilize cravings, withdrawal, anhedonia 3. Mental health tx Crimigenic 1. Addiction treatment 2. Delinquent peer affiliations 3. Pro-social regimen; structure 3 6 mos. 12-26 hrs. Continuing Care Type 5 Case 1. Vocational or educational counseling & assistance 2. Therapy / recovery *3. Medical or dental tx *4. HIV/STD prevention *5. Overdose prevention & reversal 1. Criminal thinking 2. Adaptive problem-solving Maintenance *Humanitarian Needs

Treatment Plans High Needs Low Needs High Risk Type 1 or 2 case plan Weekly individual case mgmt. 12:2 group ratio Positive reinforcement Self-help community Medication-assisted tx Type 3 or 4 case plan 12:2 group ratio Negative reinforcement Antagonists only Low Risk Type 1 or 2 case plan 12:1 group ratio Positive reinforcement Self-help community Medication-assisted tx Type 4 or 5 case plan Psycho-education (any ratio) Negative reinforcement

Pre-Disposition Assessment Require assessment of risk and need before intervention Standardized, valid, reliable, & culturally unbiased instruments Use immunity especially at pre-adjudication stage Clinical case management Automate the if / then decisions