C. K. Sinha, Mark Davenport Department of Pediatric Surgery, King s College Hospital, Denmak Hill, London SE5 9RS UK

Review Article Full text online at http://www.jiaps.com Biliary atresia C. K. Sinha, Mark Davenport Department of Pediatric Surgery, King s College Hospital, Denmak Hill, London SE5 9RS UK Correspondence: Prof M Davenport, Dept of Paediatric Surgery, King s College Hospital, London, SE5 9RS, UK. E-mail: csksinha@hotmail.com ABSTRACT Biliary atresia (BA) is a cholangiodestructive disease affecting biliary tract, which ultimately leads to cirrhosis, liver failure and death if not treated. The incidence is higher in Asian countries than in Europe. Up to 10% of cases have other congenital anomalies, such as polysplenia, asplenia, situs inversus, absence of inferior vena cava and pre-duodenal portal vein, for which we have coined the term Biliary Atresia Splenic Malformation (BASM) syndrome. For these infants the aetiology lies within the first trimester of gestation. For others affected with BA, aetiology is more obscure and perinatal destruction of fully-formed ducts perhaps by the action of hepatotropic viruses has been suggested. Whatever the cause, the lumen of the extrahepatic duct is obliterated at a variable level and this forms the basis for the commonest classification (Types I, II, III). All patients with BA present with varying degree of conjugated jaundice, pale non-pigmented stools and dark urine. Key diagnostic tests include ultrasonography, biochemical liver function tests, viral serology, and (in our centre) a percutaneous liver biopsy. In some centres, duodenal intubation and measurement of intralumenal bile is the norm. Currently BA is being managed in two stages. The first stage involves the Kasai operation, which essentially excises all extrahepatic biliary remnants leaving a transected portal plate, followed by biliary reconstruction using a Roux loop onto that plate as a portoenterostomy. If bile flow is not restored by Kasai procedure or life-threatening complications of cirrhosis ensue then consideration should be given to liver transplantation as a second stage. The outcome following the Kasai operation can be assessed in two ways: clearance of jaundice to normal values and the proportion who survive with their native liver. Clearance of jaundice (<2 mg/dl or <34 µmol/l) after Kasai has been reported to be around 60%, whereas five years survival with native liver ranges from 40% to 65%. KEY WORDS: Biliary atresia, surgical jaundice Biliary atresia (BA) is a cholangiodestructive disease affecting both the intra- and extra-hepatic biliary tract ultimately leading to cirrhosis, liver failure and death if not treated. [1] The incidence is higher in Japan and China (1 in 9,600) than in Europe and the UK (1 in 16,000). [2,3] AETIO-PATHOGENESIS Whatever be the cause, the end result is invariably complete obliteration of the lumen of extrahepatic bile ducts and progressive cellular inflammation of the intra-hepatic ducts. [4,5] In some infants, there is evidence to suggest that the process begins early in gestation. Thus antenatal ultrasonography allows detection of that sub-group of BA that show cystic changes within the extrahepatic ducts. [6] Furthermore, about 10% cases of all cases have other congenital anomalies. These anomalies 49 are unusual but characteristic such as polysplenia, asplenia, situs inversus, absence of inferior vena cava and pre-duodenal portal vein, for which we have coined the term Biliary Atresia Splenic Malformation (BASM) syndrome. [7,8] In these infants there is a high incidence of first trimester maternal problems such as diabetes and it is a reasonable supposition that all of the constituent anomalies occur during the critical period of organogenesis within that period. There are some histological similarities between the appearance of developing bile ducts at the porta hepatis at 12-14 weeks gestation and the appearance of the residual biliary ductules at the porta hepatis in BA patients, suggesting that even some cases of isolated BA the disease may be due to alterations in early bile duct development and failure of remodeling. [9] Alternatively, BA may arise due to damage of a

fully-developed biliary tract at some point in postor at least perinatal life. Thus some studies report an association of various gastrointestinal viral infections with BA including reovirus type 3, [10-13] cytomegalovirus, [14,15] respiratory syncitial virus, [16] Epstein-Barr virus, [17] human papillomavirus [18] and rotavirus type A. [19] However, other studies using similar serological and isolation techniques have found no relationship. [20-22] The most common hepatotropic viruses causing disease in older children (such as hepatitis A, B and C) have not been related to BA. [23,24] There are also various animal models that can mimic some of the pathological features of BA and which rely upon exposure of the newborn animal to viruses such as rotavirus and reovirus. [25-27] Genetics may play a role in the pathogenesis of BA, perhaps in predisposing to the detrimental effects of hepatotropic viral infection. Although in most, this plays probably a fairly minor role as the usual evidence for a genetic background is missing. Familial cases of BA have been rarely reported [28-31] and discordance has been reported in monozygotic twins. [32-35] PATHOLOGY The gross appearance of the extrahepatic biliary tract varies from an inflamed, hypertrophic occluded biliary tract to an atrophic remnant. Histologically, the liver has features of portal tract inflammation, with a small cell infiltrate, bile ductule plugging and proliferation. [36] Later on, bridging fibrosis and ultimately biliary cirrhosis occurs. The lumen of the extrahepatic duct is obliterated at a variable level and this forms the basis for the commonest classification in clinical use - the Japanese Association of Pediatric Surgeons (JAPS) classification [Figure 1]. Type 3 is the commonest ( 90%) type and has the most proximal level of obstruction in the porta hepatis - no visible duct should be present. In type 2 BA, atresia extends up to common bile duct, whereas in type 1 BA, atresia extends up to common hepatic duct level. An important variation is that of cystic change, seen in about 5% of cases, within some part of the extrahepatic biliary tract. Some cysts contain mucus, while others contain bile. If it is bile, there may be diagnostic confusion with that of a true choledochal cyst. In cystic biliary atresia, the wall is invariably thickened, lacks an epithelial lining and communicates poorly with abnormal non-dilated intrahepatic ducts. This should be evident at operative or percutaneous cholangiography. CLINICAL FEATURES All patients with BA present with varying degree of jaundice, clay-colored stools and dark yellow urine. The severity of jaundice increases steadily and it is not unusual to find bilirubin levels around 20 mg% at the time of first presentation in developing countries. Failure to thrive, coagulopathy and anemia are also not uncommon. Some will present with signs of advanced disease and cirrhosis such as ascites, umbilical hernia, prominent abdominal veins and respiratory discomfort. In comparison to European or North American experience, most cases in developing countries present late. In a review of BA, only 5% cases were seen below 60 days of age, 40% between two and three months, 30% between three and four months and 25% presented beyond four months of age. Hepatomegaly was seen in all and 60% patients had a palpable spleen. (Prof. DK Gupta personnel communication, AIIMS, New Delhi, India). Type 1 - obstruction at level of common bile duct Type 2 - obstruction at level of common hepatic duct Type 3 - obstruction at level of porta Figrue 1: Types of Biliary Atresia 50

DIAGNOSIS The clinical diagnosis of BA is usually all too obvious in late-presenting cases. However, in infants of <60 days the diagnosis can be difficult. Key investigations include ultrasonography, biochemical liver function tests, viral serology, and a percutaneous liver biopsy. In some centers, duodenal intubation and measurement of intralumenal bile is the routine test for BA. Newer modalities such as ERCP [37] and MRCP have been used at times, although the former is clearly highly operatordependent and the latter not sufficiently precise in its delineation of infantile biliary anatomy to offer real advantage. Possibly, in most surgical centers, operative cholangiography remains the principal investigation in demonstrating biliary patency. This can also be performed laparoscopicaly with apparently good results. [38] Liver function tests (LFTs): LFTs are abnormal in all patients of BA. There is a rise in total serum bilirubin (mainly conjugated) and fall in serum proteins (especially albumin) and a reversal of the albumin/ globulin ratio in advanced cases. Alkaline phosphatase and transaminase (e.g. sgot, sgpt) levels rise. Deranged LFTs correspond to the degree of parenchymal damage rather than the duration of disease. Imaging: Hepatobiliary ultrasound after 12 h of fasting (with intravenous fluid support) is perhaps the initial investigation of choice. Certainly BA is highly unlikely if a dilated intrahepatic biliary duct is found (being more indicative of an obstructed choledochal cyst, or inspissated bile syndrome). Percutaneous liver biopsy after exclusion of medical causes of cholestatic jaundice (e.g. alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency, Alagille s syndrome, and neonatal hepatitis) is a helpful investigation in diagnosis, but relies upon expert pathological interpretation. Negative ultrasonography and positive histology results should be able to establish the correct preoperative diagnosis in about 85% cases of BA (39). ERCP may be considered in infants with equivocal biopsy results, although it should be noted that this diagnosis depends crucially on failure to show a biliary tree, and hence appropriate experience and judgment are essential. [37,39] Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) is valuable in those diagnostic groups in which dilated intrahepatic bile ducts are a feature. This is particularly so in the inspissated bile syndrome group, when not only can the diagnosis be established but an attempt at therapeutic saline lavage also can be made. About half of this group can be treated effectively without the need for laparotomy and without any recurrence or long-term sequelae. [39] Nuclear scanning: Excretion of Technetium-labeled 51 isotopes into the gut within 24 h, establishes the patency of the biliary tract. However, a negative scan even after 24 h may still be consistent with both BA and an advanced stage of neonatal hepatitis. Negative HIDA scans may be repeated after one week of phenobarbitone therapy, if clinically indicated. Phenobarbitone is known to stimulate the hepatic enzymes and increase the flow of bile. One study showed that 40% patients with neonatal hepatitis excreted the isotope into the gut within 24 h in post-luminal HIDA scan while that of BA again failed to do so. Alternatively, further improvements have been suggested with the addition of betamethasone to phenobarbitone prior to HIDA scanning. [40] Percutaneous needle biopsy: Sometimes the interpretation of a biopsy can be difficult and needs an experienced pathologist as there is a lot of overlap in the histological finding of BA and neonatal hepatitis. There is also an inherent risk of bleeding in performing needle biopsy. Duodenal drainage test: A four-hourly duodenal aspiration is done to confirm the presence of bile in it. Again, the test may be falsely negative in patients with severe neonatal hepatitis. Per-operative cholangiogram: In most centers, having excluded medical causes of jaundice and failed to show isotope excretion in a HIDA scan, then progression to peroperative cholangiogram is a reasonable option. The key observation at laparotomy is presence or absence of bile in the gallbladder. Clearly in the presence of bile, apart from the rare type 1 cases, then BA can be excluded. A cholangiogram through the gallbladder should demonstrate the entire biliary tree, but in those cases, where only the distal common bile duct (CBD) opacifies, an attempt should be made to delineate the proximal intrahepatic tree by application of a distal vascular clamp. MANAGEMENT Currently BA is being managed in two phases: i. First phase: An attempt to preserve the infant s own liver. This usually involves the Kasai operation which essentially excises all extrahepatic biliary remnants leaving a transected portal plate, followed by biliary reconstruction using a Roux loop onto that plate as a portoenterostomy. ii. Second phase: If bile flow is not restored by Kasai procedure or life-threatening complications of cirrhosis ensue then consideration should be given to liver transplantation. Sometimes this is done as a primary procedure, in those who present late with features of advanced cirrhosis.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE The major breakthrough in the surgery for biliary atresia was seen in 1959 when Morio Kasai reported the operative relief of biliary obstruction in infants traditionally considered to have non-correctable biliary atresia. [41] As described by Kasai and modified subsequently by others, the surgical steps of portoenterostomy starts with opening of the abdomen through a right upper transverse incision, a peroperative cholangiogram (if required) and a wedge liver biopsy (if needed). Once the diagnosis of BA is established the liver should be mobilized fully outside of the abdominal cavity (by division of its suspensory ligaments), to ensure maximal exposure of the porta hepatis and facilitate a detailed dissection. The atretic gall bladder, cystic duct and all the remnant extrahepatic biliary tree are excised up to the level of the porta hepatis. The portal dissection itself must be wide extending from exposure of the origin of the umbilical vein from the left portal vein (in the Rex fossa) to the bifurcation of the right portal vein pedicle. Small veins from the portal vein to the portal remnant should also be divided to expose the caudate lobe posteriorly. The correct level of transaction is flush with the liver capsule, where the plane is usually selfevident. Transgression into actual liver parenchyma, however, adds nothing to the success of surgery. Most transected ductules are found in the marginal areas, recapitulating the normal biliary arrangement, and it is important to allow these to drain into a long ( 40 cms) Roux loop of jejunum. Modifications such as an intussusception valve, stomas or implanting the distal end of the Roux into the duodenum have no real advantages in clinical practice and have been discontinued in most centers. [42] Various technical variants have been proposed according to the anatomical pattern of the biliary remnant. Hepaticojejunostomy may be possible in Type 1 BA although a complete excision and portoenterostomy even in these is probably a better option. If the gallbladder and distal common bile duct are patent then anastomosis of the opened gallbladder to the conduit to the transected portal plate (porto-cholecystostomy) is possible and avoids post-operative cholangitits. [43] The appendix has also been described as a conduit (appendicojejunostomy), [44] although some later series suggests no real advantages. [45] A number of drugs have been suggested to try and improve postoperative results. For instance, there are anecdotal and uncontrolled studies suggesting benefit from corticosteroids, [46,47] ursodeoxycholic acid [47] and even Chinese herbs. [48] However, none have been subjected to anything like acceptable scientific scrutiny. The initial results of a randomized doubleblind, placebo controlled trial using post-operative prednisolone (2 mg/kg/day) showed a reduction in initial bilirubin levels but no significant difference in ultimate clearance of jaundice or reduction in need for transplantion. [49] COMPLICATIONS Early postoperative complications include: cholangitis, bleeding, leak from anastomosis, prolonged ileus, and intestinal obstruction. Late complications include: cessation of bile flow, recurrent cholangitis, portal hypertension, ascites, hepato-pulmonary syndrome, and formation of bile lakes in the liver and cirrhosis. Cholangitis Cholangitis occurs in 30-60% of cases in the first two years following the Kasai procedure. [50-52] The severity can vary from mild to fulminant sepsis. Clinically, the patient will develop fever or hypothermia, vomiting, jaundice, hepatosplenomegaly, abdominal pain/distension and acholic stools. The diagnosis can be confirmed by blood culture (and conduit cultures if present) and/or liver biopsy. [50] However, although Gram-negative organisms or a mixed flora can be seen, mostly cultures are negative. The cause of cholangitis is not clear but there must be an intestinal-biliary communication and therefore the most favored hypothesis is that of an ascending infection from the gut. Treatment includes resuscitation, intravenous fluid, broad spectrum antibiotics, (and in some centers high doses of steroids) for 7-10 days. In recurrent or lateonset cholangitis, obstruction to the drainage of the Roux loop should be considered. [53] In those where a mechanical cause can not be found, a prolonged course of antibiotics should be considered. Historically, various measures have been tried with to reduce cholangitis although none have stood the test of time. These include stomas or catheters in the proximal limb of the Roux loop, [54,55] use of an omental wrap applied to the porta hepatis, [56] jejunal loop valves, [57] creation of an intussuscepted ileocecal conduit [58] and use of an appendiceal conduit based on its vascular pedicle. [44] Roux loop stomas are associated with problems such as prolapse, retraction, fluid and electrolyte loss, bleeding and malabsorption and have been largely abandoned. PORTAL HYPERTENSION The incidence of portal hypertension is about 75% after Kasai operation [59,60] and has a clear relationship with liver fibrosis. In a recent study, it was found that increased portal pressure (measured at the time of Kasai 52

operation) is a bad prognostic sign. [61] These patients will have higher chances of developing portal hypertension, even if bilirubin level normalizes after operation. This study reported that portal pressure index (height of the saline level column above the liver surface level) was safe, simple and better predictor of postoperative outcome than a hepatic fibrosis score. [61] Portal hypertension may cause clinically significant variceal formation at the oesophagus, stomach, Roux loop and/ or rectum. In patients with good liver function, varices are treated with endoscopic sclerotherapy or banding; [62] but in those with persisting jaundice, poor synthetic liver function, this will only be temporizing measure and liver transplantation is the only really successful option. Interventional radiological techniques such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are possible for some cases, as a bridge to transplantation, but require skill and perseverance if good results are to be obtained. Portal vein hypoplasia may even preclude this option. In those unusual cases of life-threatening bleeding, but non-progressive liver disease and good liver function, a conventional portosystemic shunts should be considered, particularly if transplantation is not an option. HEPATO-PULMONARY SYNDROME AND PULMONARY HYPERTENSION Hepato-pulmonary (HP) syndrome is characterized by hypoxia, cyanosis, dyspnoea and clubbing and is due to development of pulmonary arterio-venous shunts. This seems to be due to gut-derived vasoactive substances that are not cleared by the cirrhotic liver. The diagnosis is made by pulmonary scintigraphy. HP syndrome can be reversed after liver transplantation. [62,63] Pulmonary hypertension can also be a late complication of the cirrhotic liver [64] and can be diagnosed by echocardiography. In some, liver transplantation may be indicated. BILIARY LAKES Bile containing cysts can develop in the liver postoperatively even in patients with complete clearance of jaundice. If infection and cholangitis supervene then such bile lakes can be drained either externally or internally by cyst-enterostomy. Ultimately, liver transplantation may be required as this usually implies marked degenerative cirrhotic change. MALIGNANCIES A number of malignancies have been reported in the cirrhotic livers of patient with biliary atresia including 53 hepatocellular carcinoma, [65] hepatoblastoma [65] and cholangiocarcinoma. [66] OUTCOME The outcome following the Kasai operation can be assessed in two ways: i. Clearance of jaundice ii. Proportions of native liver survival Clearance of jaundice (<2 mg/dl or <34 µmol/l) after Kasai has been reported to be around 60%, [67,68] whereas five-year survival with native liver ranges from 35% to 64%. [2,69-71] Longterm (10 years or greater) survival have been reported in the range of 27%-53%. [2,71,72] In our series, only about 15% had true longterm survival without jaundice, normal liver biochemistry and no signs of liver disease or portal hypertension. [72] However, even in this apparently cured group, liver histology still remains abnormal. [72] In the children with a failed Kasai operation, liver transplantation is the only hope. The main problems associated with this major operation are lack of a suitable donor, small size of the recipient abdomen, immunosuppression and a significant postoperative morbidity and even mortality. At present, three-year survival after liver transplantation in good centers is 85-90%. [73,74] PROGNOSTIC FACTORS Biliary atresia is a rare disease and surgical outcome following biliary atresia depends upon adequate dissection and restoration of bile flow, together with effective treatment of the two major complications (cholangitis and portal hypertension). A number of factors contribute to good outcome and may be listed as: i. Operator experience and size and experience of referral centre. ii. Extent of the pre-existing liver damage iii. Frequency of cholangitis iv. Syndromic (e.g. BASM) patients have poorer prognosis than non-syndromic group. This may be due to severe cardiac disease and hepatopulmonary syndrome. [7,8] v. Age at operation- The age at Kasai operation has an effect on outcome, but it is not as clear-cut as was once thought. There is no real cut-off (e.g. six or eight weeks or 60 days). These were simply the arbitrary values from earlier small studies. There is no doubt that the fibrotic element of the hepatopathology is progressive but beyond what age an attempt at a Kasai portoenterostomy is pointless, is not known. Some infants will come to surgery early with very

soft, non-fibrotic livers, at 20 days for instance, but because they have few residual ductules at the porta hepatis their Kasai s will fail. In contrast, some infants will be operated late (beyond 100 days) and 10-year survival in these infants could be 40%. [75] In a recent study at our center, an age cohort analysis was used to determine the effect of age at Kasai operation in 225 patients. Infants were divided into sequential cohorts by age at Kasai operation (e.g. 30, 31-40, 41-50 days etc.). The outcome was measured using clearance of jaundice to <20 µmol/l and native liver survival at two years post-operation. In the Isolated BA group, the clearance of jaundice was seen in 56% [Figure 2] and 60% retained their native liver at two years [Figure 3]. There was no overall statistical difference in probability to clear their jaundice with age at surgery or probability of native liver survival with age at surgery. Conversely, in BA infants with a presumed developmental origin (i.e. BASM or Cystic Biliary Atresia), increasing age had a significant detrimental effect in outcome. Figure 2: Clearance of jaundice (<20 µmol/l) by age cohort and cumulatively for Isolated. Biliary atresia (n = 177) Figure 3: Two-year native liver survival by age cohort and cumulatively for Isolated. Biliary atresia (n = 177) REFERENCES 1. Davenport M. Biliary atresia. Semin Pediatr Surg 2005;14:42-8. 2. Nio M, Ohi R, Miyano T, Saeki M, Shiraki K, Tanaka K, et al. Five and 10 year survival rates after surgery for biliary atresia: A report from the Japanese Biliary Atresia Registry. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:997-1000. 3. McKiernan PJ, Baker AJ, Kelly DA. The frequency and outcome of biliary atresia in the UK and Ireland. Lancet 2000;355:25-9. 4. Balistreri WF, Grand R, Hoofnagle JH, Suchy FJ, Ryckman FC, Perlmutter DH, et al. Biliary atresia: Current concepts and research directions. Hepatology 1996;23:1682-92. 5. Fischler B, Haglund B, Hjern A. A population based study on the incidence and possible pre- and perinatal etiological risk factors of biliary atresia. J Pediatr 2002;141:217-22. 6. Hinds R, Davenport M, Mieli-Vergani G, Hadzic N. Antenatal presentation of biliary atresia. J Pediatr 2004;144:43-6. 7. Davenport M, Savage M, Mowat AP, Howard ER. The biliary atresia splenic malformation syndrome. Surgery 1993;113:662-8. 8. Davenport M, Tizzard S, Underhill J, Mieli-Vergani G, Portmann B, Hadzić N. The biliary atresia splenic malformation: A 28 year single center retrospective review. J Pediatr 2006;149:393-400. 9. Tan CE, Driver M, Howard ER, Moscoso GJ. Extrahepatic biliary atresia: A first-trimester event? Clues from light microscopy and immunohistochemistry. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:808-14. 10. Glaser JH, Balistreri WF, Morecki R. Role of reovirus type 3 in persistent infantile cholestasis. J Pediatr 1984;105:912-5. 11. Morecki R, Glaser JH, Cho S, Balistreri WF, Horwitz MS. Biliary atresia and reovirus type 3 infection. N Engl J Med 1982;307: 481-4. 12. Morecki R, Glaser JH, Johnson AB, Kress Y. Detection of reovirus type 3 in the porta hepatis of an infant with extrahepatic biliary atresia: Ultrastructural and immunocytochemical study. Hepatology 1984;4:1137-42. 13. Tyler KL, Sokol RJ, Oberhaus SM, Le M, Karrer FM, Narkewicz MR, et al. Detection of reovirus RNA in hepatobiliary tissues from patients with extrahepatic biliary atresia and choledochal cysts. Hepatology 1998;27:1475-82. 14. Fischler B, Ehrnst A, Forsgren M, Orvell C, Nemeth A. The viral association of neonatal cholestasis in Sweden: A possible link between cytomegalovirus infection and extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1998;27:57-64. 15. Hart MH, Kaufman SS, Vanderhoof JA, Erdman S, Linder J, Markin RS, et al. Neonatal hepatitis and extrahepatic biliary atresia associated with cytomegalovirus infection in twins. Am J Dis Child 1991;145:302-5. 16. Nadal D, Wunderli W, Meurmann O, Briner J, Hirsig J. Isolation of respiratory syncytial virus from liver tissue and extrahepatic biliary atresia material. Scand J Infect Dis 1990;22:91-3. 17. Weaver LT, Nelson R, Bell TM. The association of extrahepatic bile duct atresia and neonatal Epstein-Barr virus infection. Acta Paediatr Scand 1984;73:155-7. 18. Drut R, Drut RM, Gomez MA, Cueto Rua E, Lojo MM. Presence of human papillomavirus in extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1998;27:530-5. 19. Petersen C, Biermanns D, Kuske M, Schakel J, Meyer-Junghanel L, Mildenberger H. New aspects in a murine model for extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1997;32:1190-5. 20. Brown WR, Sokol RJ, Levin MJ, Silverman A, Tamaru T, Lilly JR, et al. Lack of correlation between infection with reovirus 3 and extrahepatic biliary atresia or neonatal hepatitis. J Pediatr 1988;113:670-6. 21. Dussaix E, Hadchouel M, Tardieu M, Alagille D. Biliary atresia and reovirus type 3 infection. N Engl J Med 1984;310:658. 22. Steele MI, Marshall CM, Lloyd RE, Randolph VE. Reovirus 3 not detected by reverse transcriptase-mediated polymerase chain reaction analysis of preserved tissue from infants with cholestatic liver disease. Hepatology 1995;21:697-702. 23. Al-Kader HH, Nowicki MJ, Kuramoto KI, Baroudy B, Zeldis JB, 54

Balistreri WF. Evaluation of the role of hepatitis C virus in biliary atresia. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994;13:657-9. 24. Balistreri WF, Tabor E, Gerety RJ. Negative serology for hepatitis A and B viruses in 18 cases of neonatal cholestasis. Pediatrics 1980;66:269-71. 25. Bangaru B, Morecki R, Glaser JH, Gartner LM, Horwitz MS. Comparative studies of biliary atresia in the human newborn and reovirus-induced cholangitis in weanling mice. Lab Invest 1980;43:456-62. 26. Tucker RM, Hendrickson RJ, Mukaida N, Gill RG, Mack CL. Progressive biliary destruction is independent of a functional tumor necrosis factor-alpha pathway in a rhesus rotavirus-induced murine model of biliary atresia. Viral Immunol 2007;20:34-43. 27. Petersen C, Biermanns D, Kuske M, Schakel K, Meyer-Junghanel L, Mildenberger H. New aspects in a murine model for extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1997;32:1190-5. 28. Cunningham ML, Sybert VP. Idiopathic extrahepatic biliary atresia: Recurrence in sibs in two families. Am J Med Genet 1988;31:421-6. 29. Gunasekaran TS, Hassall EG, Steinbrecher UP, Yong SL. Recurrence of extrahepatic biliary atresia in two half sibs. Am J Med Genet 1992;43:592-4. 30. Lachaux A, Descos B, Plauchu H, Wright C, Louis D, Raveau J, et al. Familial extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1988;7:280-3. 31. Smith BM, Laberge JM, Schreiber R, Weber AM, Blanchard H. Familial biliary atresia in three siblings including twins. J Pediatr Surg 1991;26:1331-3. 32. Silveira TR, Salzano FM, Howard ER, Mowat AP. Extrahepatic biliary atresia and twinning. Braz J Med Biol Res 1991;24:67-71. 33. Hyams JS, Glaser JH, Leichtner AM, Morecki R. Discordance for biliary atresia in two sets of monozygotic twins. J Pediatr 1985;107:420-2. 34. Poovorawan Y, Chongsrisawat V, Tanunytthawongse C, Norapaksunthorn T, Mutirangura A, Chandrakamol B. Extrahepatic biliary atresia in twins: Zygosity determination by short tandem repeat loci. J Med Assoc Thai 1996;79:S119-24. 35. Strickland AD, Shannon K, Coln CD. Biliary atresia in two sets of twins. J Pediatr 1985;107:418-20. 36. Davenport M, Gonde C, Redkar R, Koukoulis G, Tredger M, Portmann B, et al. Immunohistochemistry of the liver and biliary tree in extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36: 1017-25. 37. Ohnuma N, Takahashi H, Tanabe M, Yoshida H, Iwai J. The role of ERCP in biliary atresia. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:365-70. 38. Okasaki T, Miyano G, Yamataka A, Kobayashi H, Koga H, Lane GJ, et al. Diagnostic laparoscopy-assisted cholangiography in infants with prolonged jaundice. Pediatr Surg Int 2006;22:140-3. 39. Davenport M, Betalli P, D Antiga L, Cheeseman P, Mieli-Vergani G, Howard ER. The spectrum of surgical jaundice in infancy. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1471-9. 40. Gupta DK, Rohatgi M, Bajpai M. Use of betamethasone and phenobarbitone before HIDA scan in neonatal hepatitis. J Pediatr Surg in press. 41. Kasai M, Suzuki S. A new operation for non-correctable biliary atresia-hepatic portoenterostomy. Shujitsu 1959;13:733-9. 42. Ogasawara Y, Yamataka A, Tsukamoto K, Okada Y, Lane GJ, Kobayashi H, et al. The intussusception antireflux valve is ineffective for preventing cholangitis in biliary atresia: A prospective study. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1826-9. 43. Lilly JR. Hepatic portocholecystostomy for biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1979;14:301-4. 44. Gupta DK, Rohatgi M. Use of appendix in biliary atresia. Indian J Pediatr 1989;56:479. 45. Tsao K, Rosenthal P, Dhawan K, Danzer E, Sydorak R, Hirose S, et al. Comparison of drainage techniques for biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1005-7. 46. Dillon PW, Owings E, Cilley R, Field D, Curnow A, Georgeson K. Immunosupression as adjuvant therapy for biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:80-5. 55 47. Meyers RL, Book LS, O Gorman MA, Jackson WD, Black RE, Johnson DG, et al. High dose steroids, ursodeoxycholic acid and chronic intravenous antibiotics improve bile flow after Kasai procedure in infants with biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:406-11. 48. Iinuma Y, Kubota M, Yag M, Kanada S, Yamazaki S, Kinoshita Y. Effects of the herbal medicine Inchinko-to on liver function in post-operative patients with biliary atresia: A pilot study. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1607-11. 49. Davenport M, Stringer MD, Tizzard SA, McClean P, Mieli-Vergani G, Hadzic N. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of corticosteroids after Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia. Hepatology 2007;46:1821-7. 50. Burnweit CA, Coln D. Influence of diversion on the development of cholangitis after hepatoportoenterostomy for biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1986;21:1143-6. 51. Ecoffey C, Rothman E, Bernard O, Hadchouel M, Valayer J, Alagille D. Bacterial cholangitis after surgery for biliary atresia. J Pediatr 1987;111:824-49. 52. Ernest van Heurn LW, Saing H, Tam PK. Cholangitis after hepatic portoenterostomy for biliary atresia: A multivariate analysis of risk factors. J Pediatr 2003;142:566-71. 53. Houben C, Phelan S, Davenport M. Late-presenting cholangitis and Roux loop obstruction after Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 2006;41:1159-64. 54. Stellin GP, Uceda JE, Lilly LR. Conduit decompression of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1983;18:782-3. 55. Kasai M. Long-term results in 189 patients of biliary atresia. Long-term Results in congenital Anomalies. In: Kiesewetter WB, editor. Tokyo: Ishuke; 1980. p. 1-9. 56. Altman RP. The portoenterostomy procedure for biliary atresia: A five year experience. Ann Surg 1978;188:351-62. 57. Shim WKT, Zhang JZ. Antirefluxing Roux en Y biliary drainage valve for hepaticoportoenterostomy: Animal experiments and clinical experience. J Pediatr Surg 1985;20:689-92. 58. Endo M, Katsumata K, Yokoyama J, Morikawa Y, Ikwawa M, Kamagata S, et al. Extended dissection of the porta hepatis and creation of an intussuscepted ileocolic conduit for biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1983;18:784-93. 59. Kasai M, Okamoto A, Ohi R, Yabe K, Matsumura Y. Changes of portal vein pressure and intrahepatic blood vessels after surgery for biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1981;16:152-9. 60. Ohi R, Mochizuki I, Komatsu K, Kasai M. Portal hypertension after successful hepatic portoenterostomy in biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1986;21:271-4. 61. Duche M, Fabre M, Kretzschmar B, Serinet M, Gauthier F, Chardot C. Prognostic value of portal pressure at the time of Kasai operation in patients with biliary atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006;43:640-5. 62. Sasaki T, Hasagawa T, Nakajima K, Tanano H, Wasa M, Fukui Y, et al. Endoscopic variceal ligation in the management of gastroesophageal varices in postoperative biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:1628-32. 63. Yonemura T, Yoshibayashi M, Uemoto S, Inomata Y, Tanaka K, Furusho K. Intrapulmonary shunting in biliary atresia before and after living-related liver transplantation. Br J Surg 1999;86: 1139-43. 64. Losay J, Piot D, Bougaran J, Ozier Y, Devictor D, Houssin D, et al. Early liver transplantation is crucial in children with liver disease and pulmonary artery hypertension. J Hepatol 1998;28:337-42. 65. Tatekawa Y, Asonuma K, Uemoto S, Inomata Y, Tanaka K. Liver transplantation for biliary atresia associated with malignant hepatic tumors. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:436-9. 66. Kulkarni PB, Beatty E Jr. Cholangiocarcinoma associated with biliary cirrhosis due to congenital biliary atresia. Am J Dis Child 1977;131:442-4. 67. Hung PY, Chen CC, Chen WJ, Lai HS, Hsu WM, Lee PH, et al. Long-term prognosis of patient with biliary atresia: A 25 year summary. J Pediatr Gastrol Nutr 2006;42:190-5. 68. Davenport M, Ville de Goyet J, Stringer MD, Mieli-Vergani G,

Kelly DA, McClean P, et al. Seamless management of biliary atresia: England and Wales 1999-2002. Lancet 2004;363:1354-7. 69. Davenport M, Kerkar N, Mieli-Vergani G, Mowat AP, Howard ER. Biliary atresia: The King s College Hospital experience (1974-1995). J Pediatr Surg 1997;32:479-85. 70. Chardot C, Carton M, Spire-Bendelac N, Le Pommelet C, Golmard JL, Auvert B. Prognosis of biliary atresia in the era of liver transplantation: French national study from 1986 to 1996. Hepatology 1999;30:606-11. 71. Altman RP, Lily JR, Greenfield J, Weinberg A, van Leeuwen K, Flanigan L. A multivariable risk factor analysis of the portoenterostomy (Kasai) procedure for biliary atresia: Twentyfive years of experience from two centers. Ann Surg 1997;226: 348-53. 72. Hadzic N, Tizzard S, Davenport M, Mieli-Vergani G. Long term survival following Kasai portoenterostomy: Is chronic liver disease inevitable? J Pediatr Gastro Nutr 2003;37:403-33. 73. Barshes NR, Lee TC, Balkrishnan R, Karpen SJ, Carter BA, Goss JA. Orthotopic liver transplantation for biliary atresia: The US experience. Liver Transpl 2005;11:1193-200. 74. Utterson EC, Shepherd RW, Sokol RJ, Bucuvalas J, Magee JC, McDiarmid SV, et al. Biliary atresia: Clinical profiles, risk factors, and outcomes of 755 patients listed for liver transplantation. J Pediatr 2005;147:180-5. 75. Davenport M, Puricelli V, Farrant P, Hadzic N, Mieli-Vergani G, Portmann B, et al. The outcome of the older (>100days) infant with biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 2004;39:575-81. Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared. Author Help: Online Submission of the Manuscripts Articles can be submitted online from http://www.journalonweb.com. For online submission articles should be prepared in two files (first page file and article file). Images should be submitted separately. 1) First Page File: Prepare the title page, covering letter, acknowledgement, etc., using a word processor program. All information which can reveal your identity should be here. Use text/rtf/doc/pdf files. Do not zip the files. 2) Article file: The main text of the article, beginning from Abstract till References (including tables) should be in this file. Do not include any information (such as acknowledgement, your names in page headers, etc.) in this file. Use text/rtf/doc/pdf files. Do not zip the files. Limit the file size to 400 kb. Do not incorporate images in the file. If file size is large, graphs can be submitted as images separately without incorporating them in the article file to reduce the size of the file. 3) Images: Submit good quality color images. Each image should be less than 1024 kb (1 MB) in size. Size of the image can be reduced by decreasing the actual height and width of the images (keep up to about 6 inches and up to about 1200 pixels) or by reducing the quality of image. JPEG is the most suitable file format. The image quality should be good enough to judge the scientific value of the image. Always retain a good quality, high resolution image for print purpose. This high resolution image should be sent to the editorial office at the time of sending a revised article. 4) Legends: Legends for the figures/images should be included at the end of the article file. 56