This online (electronic) survey contains twenty four simple questions. Those marked with an asterisk (*) must be answered.

Similar documents
Lara Kujtan, MD; Abdulraheem Qasem, MD

Applying Genomics to Cancer 21 st September The Frequency of EGFR mutations in Lung Adenocarcinoma: The Cardiff Experience

How close are we to standardised extended RAS gene mutation testing? The UK NEQAS experience

Evolution of Pathology

Diagnostics guidance Published: 14 August 2013 nice.org.uk/guidance/dg9

Quality ID #395: Lung Cancer Reporting (Biopsy/Cytology Specimens) National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

1. Q: What has changed from the draft recommendations posted for public comment in November/December 2011?

Quality ID #395: Lung Cancer Reporting (Biopsy/Cytology Specimens) National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Molecular Testing Updates. Karen Rasmussen, PhD, FACMG Clinical Molecular Genetics Spectrum Medical Group, Pathology Division Portland, Maine

HOW TO GET THE MOST INFORMATION FROM A TUMOR BIOPSY

LUNG CANCER. pathology & molecular biology. Izidor Kern University Clinic Golnik, Slovenia

Transform genomic data into real-life results

IRESSA (Gefitinib) The Journey. Anne De Bock Portfolio Leader, Oncology/Infection European Regulatory Affairs AstraZeneca

October National Health Committee. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Testing: Supplement to Recommendation Update

Guideline for the Handling of Pathology Lung Tissue Specimens

Introduction to liquid biopsies. Rachel Butler All Wales Genetics Laboratory

Cytological Sub-classification of Lung Cancer: Morphologic and Molecular Characteristics. Mercè Jordà, University of Miami

Histology: Its Influence on Therapeutic Decision Making

Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment with Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Plotting the course: optimizing treatment strategies in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma

Role of the pathologist in the diagnosis and mutational analysis of lung cancer Professor J R Gosney

Read, Interpret, and Communicate Test Results

Biomarcatori per la immunoterapia: cosa e come cercare Paolo Graziano

and management of lung cancer Maureen F. Zakowski, M.D. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Accelerate Your Research with Conversant Bio

LCA Lung Clinical Forum. 21 st October 2014

Test Category: Prognostic and Predictive. Clinical Scenario

Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma - Myers

MICROSCOPY PREDICTIVE PROFILING

5/1/2009. Squamous Dysplasia/CIS AAH DIPNECH. Adenocarcinoma

Molecular Testing in Lung Cancer

FAQs for UK Pathology Departments

Personalized Healthcare Update

LONDON CANCER NEW DRUGS GROUP RAPID REVIEW. Erlotinib for the third or fourth-line treatment of NSCLC January 2012

The Cancer Research UK Stratified Medicine Programme: Phases One and Two Dr Emily Shaw

Rob Ross, MD. Infinity Pharmaceuticals March 9 th, 2011

GENETIC TESTING FOR TARGETED THERAPY FOR NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC)

Advances in Pathology and molecular biology of lung cancer. Lukas Bubendorf Pathologie

Changing demographics of smoking and its effects during therapy

Targeted Therapies in the Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. A Multi-Disciplinary Approach

EGFR ctdna Testing. Andrew Wallace 21/09/2015 Genomic Diagnostics Laboratory St. Mary s Hospital, Manchester

2 nd line Therapy and Beyond NSCLC. Alan Sandler, M.D. Oregon Health & Science University

Diagnostics consultation document KRAS mutation testing of tumours in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer

NGS in Lung Cancer Cytology

ONCOLOGY LETTERS 8: , 2014

EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC

Metabolic Phenotype of Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma: relationship with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation

Page: 1 of 27. Molecular Analysis for Targeted Therapy of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Lung Cancer Staging Project, Data Elements

Data Sharing Consortiums and Large Datasets to Inform Cancer Diagnosis

Drug Prior Authorization Form Opdivo (nivolumab)

AHFS Final. line. Criteria Used in. combined. cisplatin. Strength. established was. Non-small Cell Lung. Cancer: of carboplatin and

Infrastructure for Clinical Data Exchange

Disclosures Genomic testing in lung cancer

Overview of the ESP Lung and Colon EQA schemes with a focus on Dutch laboratories

Enrollment Form: Pancreas

European Union survey on organization and quality control of cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination programs

Personalised cancer care Information for Medical Specialists. A new way to unlock treatment options for your patients

Joachim Aerts Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Netherlands. Drawing the map: molecular characterization of NSCLC

Diagnostic test Suggested website label Description Hospitals available

Reflex Testing Guidelines for Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Performance Improvement Strategies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Audioconference - April 22, 2010

Case Studies. Ravi Salgia, MD, PhD

3/23/2017. Disclosure of Relevant Financial Relationships. Pathologic Staging Updates in Lung Cancer T STAGE OUTLINE SURVIVAL ACCORDING TO SIZE ONLY

POLICY FOR CLINICAL AUDIT OF NEW CASES OF INVASIVE CERVICAL CANCER AND DISCLOSURE OF RESULTS

VDx: Unlocking Complex Diagnostics

Molecular Analysis for Targeted Therapy for Non- Small-Cell Lung Cancer Section 2.0 Medicine Subsection 2.04 Pathology/Laboratory

COLORECTAL PATHWAY GROUP, MANCHESTER CANCER. Guidelines for the assessment of mismatch. Colorectal Cancer

8/22/2016. Major risk factors for the development of lung cancer are: Outline

Lung Cancer Case. Since the patient was symptomatic, a targeted panel was sent. ALK FISH returned in 2 days and was positive.

QIAGEN Complete Solutions for Liquid Biopsy Molecular Testing

MY LUNG CANCER CARE PLAN

Reparatory system 18 lectures Heyam Awad

Robert Beer

Harnessing Complexity: Companion Diagnostics in Oncology

Tumor Board Discussions: Case 1

Research Article Mutated KRAS is an Independent Negative Prognostic Factor for Survival in NSCLC Stage III Disease Treated with High-Dose Radiotherapy

Diagnosing Non-small Cell Carcinoma In Small Biopsy And Cytology READ ONLINE

CURRENT STANDARD OF CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER: THE EVOLUTION OF ESMO CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES

A Clinical Context Report

Learning from the Impact of the Drug-Diagnostics Strategy in Oncology

COLORECTAL PATHWAY GROUP, MANCHESTER CANCER. Guidelines for the assessment of mismatch. Colorectal Cancer

Corporate Medical Policy

THE USE OF BIOMARKERS IN TREATMENT PATTERNS

PRECISION INSIGHTS. Liquid GPS. Blood-based tumor profiling and quantitative monitoring. Reveal more with cfdna + cfrna.

Disclosure of Relevant Financial Relationships NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER: 70% PRESENT IN ADVANCED STAGE

UNDERSTANDING SQUAMOUS CELL LUNG CANCER

Enterprise Interest No

VENTANA ALK (D5F3) Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody. ALK IHC Biomarker Testing Aiding in patient diagnosis

NGS in Cancer Pathology After the Microscope: From Nucleic Acid to Interpretation

Detection of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) gene in Non-Small Cell lung Cancer (NSCLC) By CISH Technique

ECMC cfdna consensus meeting

UW Medicine Neuropathology

Personalized Genetics

UW Medicine Neuropathology

Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Histopathology ד"ר יהודית זנדבנק

Anatomic Molecular Pathology: An Emerging Field

Histopathology of NSCLC, IHC markers and ptnm classification

Transcription:

1. Type of survey This is a retrospective survey that will NOT require the disclosure of any individual patient records or data only information about overall EGFR mutation testing practices and the outcomes of these tests carried out in the participating laboratories. This online (electronic) survey contains twenty four simple questions. Those marked with an asterisk () must be answered. The survey should be completed by laboratory personnel e.g. pathologist, oncologist or laboratory head, who has authorized access to the data source from which they are required to answer the survey questions. Page 1

2. Survey objectives 1. To obtain data on the current status of EGFR mutation testing across twelve Asian countries, in terms of types of mutation test, sample types, sample preparation, logistics of test request, sample shipment, and result reporting, in order to be used as baseline information for possible improvements to ideal EGFR mutation testing practice 2. To obtain the number of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who were tested for EGFR mutations in surveyed sites in order to estimate the number of NSCLC patients who are tested for EGFR mutations in the participating countries in Asia Pacific 3. To estimate the frequency of EGFR mutation positivity in: the overall EGFR tested NSCLC population histological subtypes of EGFR tested NSCLC demographic subgroups (gender, smoking status) 4. To estimate the proportion of NSCLC patients who are tested for EGFR mutations in the participating countries in Asia Pacific 5. To determine which EGFR mutation testing methods are most commonly used in the participating countries 6. To evaluate the source of the data captured and to utilize this information for interpretation Page 2

3. Minimum requirements for participating sites Sites should have access to a laboratory which performs EGFR mutation testing for clinical purposes, at the request of a treating physician/pathologist Must have tested at least 100 NSCLC cases for EGRF from January December 2011, or if for a given country no site can meet that criteria, sites with the highest numbers of EGFR testing will be surveyed Must have access to data sources containing information about the NSCLC population (number of cases diagnosed and tested, histology, test results) e.g. databases Page 3

4. Information about the EGFR mutation testing laboratory Please provide the following details Contact Name: Company/Laboratory Name (if applicable): Hospital Name (if applicable): City/Town: State/Province (if applicable): Country: Email Address: Phone Number: Page 4

5. Information about the EGFR mutation testing laboratory Please specify your type of laboratory: Commercial (independent from hospital) Laboratory only tests samples from your own hospital Laboratory tests samples from your own and other hospitals Is your laboratory accredited or does it participate in a Quality Assurance Programme? (Please tick all that apply) gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc None Accredited by local accrediting body Accredited by international accrediting body Participates in a Quality Assurance programme Page 5

6. Information about NSCLC population and proportion tested for EGFR mutations The purpose of this survey is to determine the proportion of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients that are being tested in your country, as well as the frequency of EGFR mutation positivity. Hence, we need to be able to estimate the TOTAL number of NSCLC patients diagnosed. In the following section, you will first be asked to provide some information about the NSCLC population that is being tested; i.e. the total number of patients diagnosed with NSCLC in 2011 in the hospitals you serve, and their characteristics. (If you do not know the total number of patients diagnosed with NSCLC in the hospitals you serve, you can answer 'Not known'.) Then you will be asked how many of these NSCLC patients were tested for EGFR mutations in 2011 in your laboratory. Finally, you will be asked how many of the EGFR mutation tests were positive. Page 6

7. Information about the NSCLC population that is tested for EGFR mutations What is the total number of NSCLC cases NEWLY DIAGNOSED in the hospital(s) from which you received samples for EGFR mutation testing during January December 2011? (If the number is not known, please type 'Not known' in the relevant box) Squamous cases are also non adenocarcinoma cases. If the data are available, please report here the number of patients who are both non adenocarcinoma AND squamous cases Total number of NSCLC cases newly diagnosed during January December 2011 Number of adenocarcinoma cases diagnosed Number non adenocarcinoma cases diagnosed Number of squamous cell carcinoma cases diagnosed Number of male patients diagnosed Number of female patients diagnosed Number of current/ex smoker patients diagnosed Number of never smoker patients diagnosed Number of biopsy and/or cytology samples diagnosed Number of surgical specimen samples diagnosed Page 7

8. Information about the samples tested for EGFR mutations What is the total number of NSCLC cases TESTED FOR EGFR MUTATIONS in your laboratory during January December 2011? (If the number is not known, please type 'Not known' in the relevant box) Squamous cases are also non adenocarcinoma cases. If the data are available, please report here the number of patients who are both non adenocarcinoma AND squamous cases Total number of NSCLC cases tested during January December 2011 Number of adenocarcinoma cases tested Number non adenocarcinoma cases tested Number of squamous cell carcinoma cases tested Number of male patients tested Number of female patients tested Number of current/ex smoker patients tested Number of never smoker patients tested Number of biopsy and/or cytology samples tested Number of surgical specimen samples tested Page 8

9. Information about the samples tested for EGFR mutations How many samples tested for EGFR mutation during 2011 were from the following sites? (Please type 'Not known' in the box if you do not know the answer) Number of samples from primary tumour Number of samples from metastatic site (including pleural effusion) Number of samples from unknown site How many samples tested for EGFR mutation during 2011 were CYTOLOGY samples? (Please type 'Not known' in the box if you do not know the answer) Number of cytology samples Page 9

10. Information about the samples that tested positive for EGFR mutations What is the number of cases that were POSITIVE FOR EGFR MUTATIONS in your laboratory from January December 2011? (Please type 'Not known' in the box if you do not know the answer) Squamous cases are also non adenocarcinoma cases. If the data are available, please report here the number of patients who are both non adenocarcinoma AND squamous cases TOTAL number of samples that were positive for EGFR mutations during January December 2011 Number of EGFR mutation positive adenocarcinoma cases Number EGFR mutation positive non adenocarcinoma cases Number of EGFR mutation positive squamous cell carcinoma cases Number of EGFR mutation positive male patients Number of EGFR mutation positive female patients Number of EGFR mutation positive current/ex smoker patients Number of EGFR mutation positive never smoker patients Number of EGFR mutation positive biopsy and/or cytology samples Number of EGFR mutation positive surgical specimen samples What is the total number of cases tested where the test failed or did not yield a clear result and the EGFR mutation status was judged to be undetermined? (Please type 'Not known' in the box if you do not know the answer) Total number of undetermined cases Page 10

11. Information about sample processing How often is IHC used to predict the subtypes of samples with poorly differentiated morphology? Routinely (regularly, or on a daily basis) Occasionally (every now and then, not often) Not known Do you receive a copy of the pathology report issued for the EGFR mutation testing sample when it arrives at your laboratory? Yes Sometimes No If you receive a copy of the pathology report with the sample, does information on the percentage tumour content or other assessment of sample quality accompany the sample to the testing lab? Yes Sometimes No Page 11

12. Information about EGFR mutation testing methods used in your laboratory You will now be asked which EGFR mutation testing methods you most commonly use for TISSUE samples, and then which methods you most commonly use for CYTOLOGY samples. You will be asked to rank up to three methods in order of how frequently they are used in your laboratory. If you only use one (or two) method(s), there is no need to select a second/third method. If you do not test cytology samples for EGFR mutations, please select the option "This laboratory does not test cytology samples" under the question about cytology samples. Page 12

13. Information about EGFR mutation testing methods used What is the most common EGFR mutation testing method used in your laboratory for TISSUE samples? (Please choose up to three answers and rank them in order of frequency used: most common method, second most common, third most common) Second most Third most common Most common method common method method DNA sequencing Commercial in vitro diagnostic kit (select which kit): Therascreen EGFR RGQ PCR Kit (QIAGEN) EGFR29 Mutation detection kit (AMOY) Cobas EGFR Mutation Test (Roche) PNAClamp Mutation detection kit (Panagene) Therascreen EGFR Pyro Kit (QIAGEN) Other commercial in vitro diagnostic kit Other laboratory developed method (select which method): PNA LNA PCR clamp PCR INVADER Cycleave Other laboratory developed method Page 13

14. Information about EGFR mutation testing methods used What is the most common EGFR mutation testing method used in your laboratory for CYTOLOGY samples? (Please choose up to three answers and rank them in order of frequency used: most common method, second most common, third most common) Second most Third most common Most common method common method method DNA sequencing Commercial in vitro diagnostic kit (select which kit): Therascreen EGFR RGQ PCR Kit (QIAGEN) EGFR29 Mutation detection kit (AMOY) Cobas EGFR Mutation Test (Roche) PNAClamp Mutation detection kit (Panagene) Therascreen EGFR Pyro Kit (QIAGEN) Other commercial in vitro diagnostic kit Other laboratory developed method (select which method): PNA LNA PCR clamp PCR INVADER Cycleave Other laboratory developed method This laboratory does not test cytology samples for EGFR mutations Page 14

15. Reason for selecting the EGFR mutation testing method(s) you use What is the main reason for selecting the particular EGFR mutation testing methods used in your lab? (Select three reasons in order of importance) Most important Second most important Third most important Available equipment Cost Sensitivity ability to detect mutations at a low level Easy to use Quality controlled Range of mutations detected Page 15

16. Cost of EGFR mutation testing What is the total or overall average cost per test to your lab? (Defined as a fully inclusive cost to the system from sample receipt to reporting, to include DNA extraction and mutation analysis.) < 50 USD 50 200 USD 200 500 USD > 500 USD Page 16

17. Information about turnaround time for EGFR mutation testing What is the turnaround time in your laboratory, defined as the time from receipt of sample in your laboratory, to sending out the report? < 5 days 5 10 days 11 15 days > 15 days Page 17

18. Other biomarker tests on NSCLC samples Are other molecular biomarkers associated with NSCLC targeted treatments, such as KRAS mutations or ALK translocation, tested for in your laboratory? KRAS Yes No ALK Yes No Page 18

19. Information about how records used for this survey are captured and stored What is the source of the records used for this survey? (Please tick all that apply) gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc gfedc Laboratory electronic Hospital electronic Laboratory paper based Hospital paper based Other not listed Page 19

20. Information about paper based records You only need to answer the questions on this page if you will use paper based records (from any source) to help you complete this survey. If you will only use electronic records to complete this survey, please press 'Next' and proceed to the next page. How are the appropriate paper based source records identified for this study? (Please choose one answer) From a central record Through asking each doctor individually Through asking laboratory personnel individually Where are the paper based source records used for this study stored? (Please choose one answer) In a single central location Each doctor stores their own records Each laboratory staff stores their own records Page 20

21. Information about how records used for this survey are captured and stored The questions on this page are designed to help us understand whether any patients could be 'missing' from your records, and also whether data from any patients could have been duplicated. Your answers to these questions will help us with data interpretation. Do the source records surveyed contain data from all available patients? (Please choose one answer) Yes, data from all LABORATORY and all HOSPITAL patients Yes, data from all LABORATORY patients Yes, data from all HOSPITAL patients No Do the source records surveyed collect data consecutively, meaning no patients could be missed? Yes, consecutive data collection means no patients could be missed No, there is a possibility that patients could be missed Is there the possibility of duplicate records amongst the source records surveyed? Yes No Page 21

22. Electronic signature Please enter your name here. This electronic signature confirms that the answers given in this survey are based on data sourced directly from laboratory and/or hospital records. Once you click the 'Done' button below, the survey will be completed and you will no longer be able to enter the survey, or visit previous pages, to edit or change your data. If you are ready to exit the survey, please press 'Done'. Page 22