ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2555 S. State Street Ann Arbor, MI 48104 734-994-2200 www. a2schools.org Pioneer High School Annual Education Report (AER)!! Dear Pioneer Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the Annual Education Report (AER) that provides key information on the 2011-2012 educational progress for Pioneer High School. The AER addresses the complex reporting information required by federal and state laws. The school s report contains information about student assessment, Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and teacher quality. If you have any questions about the AER, please contact Interim Principal Kevin Hudson, at 994-2126 for assistance. The AER is available for you to review electronically by visiting the following web site www.a2schools.org or you may review a copy available at the school office. The School is a Focus School and made AYP For 2011-2012, Pioneer did make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and was named a Focus School because the school has a large student achievement gap between the top 30% of highest achieving students and the bottom 30% of lowest achieving students across the tested subjects (mathematics, reading, science, social studies and writing; as appropriate for the school grade levels tested). We are actively working to address the school issues by continuing to implement the district s Discipline Gap and Achievement Gap plans. Information used to rank schools is based on the development of the Top to Bottom list of schools State law requires that we also report additional information. 1. PROCESS FOR ASSIGNING PUPILS TO THE SCHOOL a. Attendance in the Ann Arbor Public Schools is designated by geographic boundaries along with some limited in-district school of choice and out of district school of choice. 2. THE STATUS OF THE 3-5 YEAR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN can be found at www.a2pioneer.a2schools.org. 3. A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EACH SPECIALIZED SCHOOL a. Ann Arbor Open is a K-8 magnet school offering an open school philosophy where grades are blended and the emphasis is on learning through experience. b. Community High School is a 9 th -12 th magnet liberal arts and science high school which fosters teaching and learning in a small, relationship based environment, where instruction is rigorous and authentic.
c. Roberto Clemente Student Development Center is an 8 th -12 th grade alternative education program for students who require a smaller, more structured and nurturing environment. are self-referred or referred by another district middle or high school. d. A2 Technological High School is a 9 th -12 th alternative high school that offers a smaller learning environment with a variety of credit recovery options, individualized student learning programs, and hybrid schedules. 4. A description of the AAPS CORE CURRICULUM, is available at http://www.aaps.k12.mi.us/ins.home/academics 5. The aggregate student achievement results for Pioneer based on the Scholastic Inventory, the 10 th grade ACT PLAN, the 11 th grade ACT mean score, and the mean SAT scores by graduating year: a. SRI Scholastic Inventory Lexile score at or above proficiency i. 87% (2010/11) ii. 86.7% (2011/12) b. 10 th grade PLAN (1-32 range) i. 20.5 ii. 20.5 c. 11 th grade ACT mean score (1-36 range) i. 23.3 ii. 24.3 d. SAT mean score for graduating class: i. Verbal= 606.4 Math = 632.4 Participation = 35.4% (Class of 2010) ii. Verbal= 608.8 Math =645.4 Participation = 38.1% (Class of 2011) 6. Below is the data for students who participate in postsecondary enrollments (commonly known as dual enrollments with local colleges and universities), number of students enrolled in AP courses and number of AP courses offered. a. Dual enrollments i. 28 students/2.7% of students (2010/11) ii. 9 students /.05% of students (2011/12) b. Number of AP courses offered i. 14 (2010/11) ii. 15 (2011/12) c. Number of students enrolled in AP courses (Grades 10-12) i. 628 / 25% of students (2010/11) ii. 533/ 32% of students (2011/12) d. Percentage of students receiving scores leading to college credit: i. 55% (2010/11) ii. Results are not in for 2011/12 7. Pioneer holds a capsule night each fall when parents learn about the academic curriculum and have the opportunity to meet with administrators. Conferences are formally held twice a year but Pioneer notifies families if a student is not achieving in the classroom so supports can be put in place. Pioneer families are very involved in the academic success of the students.
We congratulate Pioneer students and staff who continue to work hard to improve achievement for all students. Collaboration and support for education is a hallmark of this community and critical to meeting our mission of providing a world-class education for all of our students. Sincerely, Patricia Green, Ph.D. Superintendent 994-2230 greenp@aaps.k12.mi.us
Student Assessment Data - Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Page 1 of 23
Student Assessment Data - Michigan Merit Examination (MME) Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) 11 All 2010-11 98.2% 52.7% 72.8% 75.1% 34.4% 40.7% 18.6% 6.3% 11 All 2011-12 99.8% 55.9% 74.1% 76.3% 37.3% 39% 16.3% 7.4% 11 American Indian or Alaska Native 2011-12 <10 48.7% 50% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 11 Asian 2010-11 98.3% 65.5% 80.2% 86.4% 50.8% 35.6% 11.9% 1.7% 11 Asian 2011-12 100% 65.5% 83.8% 79.7% 45.3% 34.4% 14.1% 6.3% 11 Black or African American 11 Black or African American 11 Hispanic or Latino 11 Hispanic or Latino 11 Two or More Races 11 Two or More Races 2010-11 96.1% 23.7% 39.3% 42.9% 4.1% 38.8% 32.7% 24.5% 2011-12 97.7% 27.1% 44.7% 41.9% 11.6% 30.2% 30.2% 27.9% 2010-11 90.9% 37.7% 50% 60% 10% 50% 30% 10% 2011-12 <10 41.6% 38.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 2010-11 94.7% 50.8% 73.6% 77.8% 44.4% 33.3% 22.2% 0% 2011-12 100% 55.1% 75% 78.3% 30.4% 47.8% 21.7% 0% 11 White 2010-11 99.2% 59.5% 81.8% 79.2% 36.7% 42.4% 16.7% 4.1% 11 White 2011-12 100% 62.4% 81.6% 82% 40.6% 41.4% 14% 4% 11 Female 2010-11 97.9% 55.1% 74.8% 76.1% 34.8% 41.3% 17.9% 6% % Not (Level 4) Page 2 of 23
Student Assessment Data - Michigan Merit Examination (MME) Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) 11 Female 2011-12 100% 60.4% 77% 79.2% 40.1% 39.1% 12.2% 8.6% 11 Male 2010-11 98.5% 50.3% 70.8% 74.1% 34% 40.1% 19.3% 6.6% 11 Male 2011-12 99.5% 51.4% 71.2% 73.8% 34.8% 38.9% 19.9% 6.3% 11 Economically Disadvantaged 11 Economically Disadvantaged 11 Limited 11 Limited 11 with Disabilities 11 with Disabilities 2010-11 92.2% 35.1% 38.4% 37.3% 8.5% 28.8% 42.4% 20.3% 2011-12 98.2% 39.9% 38.3% 39.3% 3.6% 35.7% 32.1% 28.6% 2010-11 <10 12.9% 4.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 2011-12 100% 12.9% 9.7% 25% 0% 25% 16.7% 58.3% 2010-11 93.8% 16.9% 40.3% 40% 6.7% 33.3% 36.7% 23.3% 2011-12 100% 19.4% 41.7% 45.2% 19% 26.2% 33.3% 21.4% Mathematics 11 All 2010-11 99% 27.3% 57.5% 64.3% 26% 38.3% 22.1% 13.5% Mathematics 11 All 2011-12 99.5% 29.1% 58.7% 64.7% 28.8% 36% 22.8% 12.5% Mathematics 11 American Indian or Alaska Native 2011-12 <10 13.8% 30% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 Asian 2010-11 100% 58.3% 82.5% 91.7% 55% 36.7% 6.7% 1.7% Mathematics 11 Asian 2011-12 100% 60.2% 86% 84.4% 56.3% 28.1% 14.1% 1.6% Mathematics 11 Black or African American Mathematics 11 Black or African American Mathematics 11 Hispanic or Latino Mathematics 11 Hispanic or Latino Page 3 of 23 2010-11 98% 5% 14.4% 18% 0% 18% 28% 54% 2011-12 97.7% 6.1% 20.8% 20.9% 4.7% 16.3% 25.6% 53.5% 2010-11 100% 14% 42.9% 72.7% 9.1% 63.6% 9.1% 18.2% 2011-12 <10 15.9% 16.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 % Not (Level 4)
Student Assessment Data - Michigan Merit Examination (MME) Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Tested Mathematics 11 Two or More Races Mathematics 11 Two or More Races State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) 2010-11 94.7% 22.6% 57.7% 77.8% 33.3% 44.4% 11.1% 11.1% 2011-12 100% 25.4% 49.4% 52.2% 21.7% 30.4% 34.8% 13% Mathematics 11 White 2010-11 99.2% 31.9% 64.8% 65.7% 24.5% 41.2% 26.1% 8.2% Mathematics 11 White 2011-12 99.6% 33.6% 65.8% 69.7% 27.4% 42.2% 24.2% 6.1% Mathematics 11 Female 2010-11 98.9% 25.4% 57.9% 68.8% 25.8% 43% 19.9% 11.3% Mathematics 11 Female 2011-12 100% 26.9% 57.8% 64.5% 28.9% 35.5% 23.4% 12.2% Mathematics 11 Male 2010-11 99% 29.1% 57% 60.1% 26.3% 33.8% 24.2% 15.7% Mathematics 11 Male 2011-12 99.1% 31.2% 59.7% 65% 28.6% 36.4% 22.3% 12.7% Mathematics 11 Economically Disadvantaged Mathematics 11 Economically Disadvantaged Mathematics 11 Limited Mathematics 11 Limited Mathematics 11 with Disabilities Mathematics 11 with Disabilities 2010-11 96.9% 11.6% 19.7% 21% 4.8% 16.1% 27.4% 51.6% 2011-12 96.5% 13.4% 19.7% 23.6% 5.5% 18.2% 25.5% 50.9% 2010-11 <10 8.1% 32% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 2011-12 100% 9% 16.1% 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 50% 2010-11 96.9% 3.6% 13.9% 19.4% 0% 19.4% 25.8% 54.8% 2011-12 100% 3.9% 17.4% 21.4% 4.8% 16.7% 28.6% 50% % Not (Level 4) Page 4 of 23
Student Assessment Data - MI-Access : Functional Independence Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Surpassed (Level 1) % Attained (Level 2) Mathematics 11 All 2010-11 <10 68.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 All 2011-12 <10 68.5% 45.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 Asian 2011-12 <10 68.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 Black or African American 2011-12 <10 52.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 White 2010-11 <10 75.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 White 2011-12 <10 74.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 Female 2011-12 <10 60.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 Male 2010-11 <10 70.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 Male 2011-12 <10 73.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 11 All 2010-11 <10 59.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 11 All 2011-12 <10 61.9% 54.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 11 Asian 2011-12 <10 52.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 11 Black or African American 2011-12 <10 39.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 11 White 2010-11 <10 70.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 11 White 2011-12 <10 70.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 11 Female 2011-12 <10 57.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 11 Male 2010-11 <10 59.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 11 Male 2011-12 <10 64.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 % Emerging (Level 3) Page 5 of 23
Student Assessment Data - MI-Access : Supported Independence Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Tested Language Arts Language Arts Language Arts Language Arts Language Arts Language Arts State % District % School % % Surpassed (Level 1) % Attained (Level 2) 11 All 2011-12 <10 80.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 11 Black or African American 11 Two or More Races 2011-12 <10 83.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 2011-12 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 11 White 2011-12 <10 79.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 11 Female 2011-12 <10 83.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 11 Male 2011-12 <10 78.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 All 2011-12 <10 89.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 Black or African American Mathematics 11 Two or More Races 2011-12 <10 92.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 2011-12 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 White 2011-12 <10 88.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 Female 2011-12 <10 91.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 Male 2011-12 <10 88.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 11 All 2011-12 <10 83.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 11 Black or African American Science 11 Two or More Races 2011-12 <10 88.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 2011-12 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 11 White 2011-12 <10 81.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 11 Female 2011-12 <10 85.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 11 Male 2011-12 <10 82% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 % Emerging (Level 3) Page 6 of 23
Student Assessment Data - MI-Access : Participation Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Surpassed (Level 1) % Attained (Level 2) % Emerging (Level 3) Page 7 of 23
Student Assessment Data - MEAP-Access Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Level 1 % Level 2 % Level 3 Page 8 of 23
AYP Detail Data Student Group Location Subject % Tested (Goal 95%) % for AYP* All State 98.8% 82.9% All State Mathematics 98.5% 57.5% All District 99.9% 90.9% All District Mathematics 99% 79.8% All School 99.1% 91.8% All School Mathematics 98.9% 80.6% American Indian or Alaska Native American Indian or Alaska Native American Indian or Alaska Native American Indian or Alaska Native American Indian or Alaska Native American Indian or Alaska Native Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander State 97.7% 78.6% State Mathematics 97.5% 47.4% District 97.4% 85.7% District Mathematics 97.4% 75% School <30 <30 School Mathematics <30 <30 State 100.6% 89.8% State Mathematics 99.3% 80.1% District 103.6% 95.6% District Mathematics 99.8% 94.5% School 100% 98.2% School Mathematics 100% 98.2% Black or African American State 96.9% 67.4% Black or African American State Mathematics 96.4% 32.2% Black or African American District 98.2% 75.8% Black or African American District Mathematics 97.6% 49.4% Black or African American School 95.8% 66.7% Black or African American School Mathematics 95.8% 35.7% Hispanic or Latino State 99% 75.8% Hispanic or Latino State Mathematics 98.5% 44.6% Hispanic or Latino District 100.2% 77.8% Hispanic or Latino District Mathematics 99.2% 58.5% Hispanic or Latino School <30 <30 Hispanic or Latino School Mathematics <30 <30 Two or More Races State 99.1% 83.6% Two or More Races State Mathematics 99% 54.9% Two or More Races District 99.5% 91.2% Two or More Races District Mathematics 99.3% 77.9% Two or More Races School <30 <30 Two or More Races School Mathematics <30 <30 White State 99.2% 86.9% White State Mathematics 99% 63.9% Page 9 of 23
AYP Detail Data Student Group Location Subject % Tested (Goal 95%) % for AYP* White District 99.5% 94.7% White District Mathematics 99.2% 85.7% White School 99.3% 95.5% White School Mathematics 99% 86.2% Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged State 98.3% 74.4% State Mathematics 97.9% 43.3% District 98.5% 75.7% District Mathematics 97.7% 51.8% School 96.9% 68.3% School Mathematics 95.4% 45.8% with Disabilities State 97.7% 51.5% with Disabilities State Mathematics 97.3% 32% with Disabilities District 98.8% 64.6% with Disabilities District Mathematics 98.3% 46.2% with Disabilities School 98% 71.7% with Disabilities School Mathematics 98% 43.5% Note: 1037 Recently arrived LEP students took part in the State s ELPA instead of the MEAP/MME/MI-Access. Page 10 of 23
AYP Detail Data - Graduation Rate Student Group Location Graduation Rate (High Schools only) (Goal 80%) All State 79.2% All District 91.16% All School >95% American Indian or Alaska Native State 68.49% American Indian or Alaska Native District <10 American Indian or Alaska Native School <10 Asian State 90.49% Asian District >95% Asian School >95% Black or African American State 62.56% Black or African American District 79.21% Black or African American School >95% Hispanic or Latino State 68.31% Hispanic or Latino District 79.69% Hispanic or Latino School 85% Migrant State 73.33% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander State 71.79% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander District <10 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander School <10 Two or More Races State 73.44% Two or More Races District 85.48% Two or More Races School 90% White State 84.81% White District >95% White School >95% Female State 83.17% Female District 91.96% Female School >95% Male State 75.45% Male District 90.41% Male School >95% Economically Disadvantaged State 67.16% Economically Disadvantaged District 73.95% Economically Disadvantaged School 92.19% with Disabilities State 64.79% with Disabilities District 80.12% with Disabilities School 88.41% * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. Page 11 of 23
AYP Detail Data - Attendance Rate Student Group Location Attendance Rate (Goal 90%) All State 94.8% All District 96.1% All School 97.5% American Indian or Alaska Native State 94.1% American Indian or Alaska Native District 95% American Indian or Alaska Native School 97.7% Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander State 96.4% Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander District 97.1% Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander School 98.5% Black or African American State 91% Black or African American District 95.6% Black or African American School 96.8% Hispanic or Latino State 94.3% Hispanic or Latino District 95.6% Hispanic or Latino School 97% Two or More Races State 95% Two or More Races District 95.9% Two or More Races School 97.4% White State 95.8% White District 96.1% White School 97.4% Economically Disadvantaged State 94.8% Economically Disadvantaged District 96.1% Economically Disadvantaged School 97.5% with Disabilities State 93.2% with Disabilities District 94.9% with Disabilities School 95.7% * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. Page 12 of 23
Michigan Annual AYP Objectives for /ELA School Year Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11 2001-02 38% 31% 42% 2002-03 38% 31% 42% 2003-04 38% 31% 42% 2004-05 48% 43% 52% 2005-06 50% 48% 46% 45% 43% 41% 52% 2006-07 50% 48% 46% 45% 43% 41% 52% 2007-08 60% 59% 57% 56% 54% 53% 61% 2008-09 60% 59% 57% 56% 54% 53% 61% 2009-10 70% 69% 68% 67% 66% 65% 71% 2010-11 78% 77% 76% 75% 74% 73% 79% 2011-12 86% 85% 84% 83% 82% 82% 86% 2012-13 93% 92% 92% 91% 91% 91% 93% 2013-14 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Page 13 of 23
Michigan Annual AYP Objectives for Mathematics School Year Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11 2001-02 47% 31% 33% 2002-03 47% 31% 33% 2003-04 47% 31% 33% 2004-05 56% 43% 44% 2005-06 59% 56% 53% 50% 46% 43% 44% 2006-07 59% 56% 53% 50% 46% 43% 44% 2007-08 67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54% 55% 2008-09 67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54% 55% 2009-10 67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54% 55% 2010-11 75% 74% 71% 70% 67% 66% 67% 2011-12 83% 82% 81% 80% 78% 77% 78% 2012-13 91% 91% 90% 90% 89% 89% 89% 2013-14 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Page 14 of 23
School AYP Status Title 1 Status AYP ELA/ Status AYP Mathematics Status AYP Overall Status Education Yes Report Card Grade No Met Met Met A Focus School Status Indicator Page 15 of 23
Teacher Quality Data Other B.A. M.A. Ph.D Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School 0 30 80 1 Professional Qualifications are defined by the State and may include information such as the degrees of public school teachers (e.g., percentage of teachers with Bachelors Degrees or Masters Degrees) or the percentage of fully certified teachers Page 16 of 23
Teacher Quality Data Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School with Emergency Certification Certification Percent 0% Page 17 of 23
Teacher Quality Data Percentage of Core Academic Subject Elementary and Secondary School Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers School Aggregate 0% Page 18 of 23
NAEP 2011 Grade 4 Mathematics Results Percent of Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Percent Advanced All 100 22 43 30 5 Male Female National Lunch Program Eligility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an Language Learner ELL Not ELL 50 50 43 56 71 16 6 3 2 13 87 4 96 21 22 35 11 14 53 31 7 23 50 18 47 21 Reporting Standards not met. Note: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 2011 Mathematics Achievement. 42 45 47 41 45 39 48 22 50 37 44 41 44 31 29 17 41 36 8 19 45 21 13 32 11 31 6 4 1 8 5 0 2 26 6 1 5 1 5 Page 19 of 23
NAEP 2011 Grade 8 Mathematics Results Percent of Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Percent Advanced All 100 29 40 25 6 Male Female National Lunch Program Eligility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an Language Learner ELL Not ELL 51 49 42 58 74 16 4 3 1 2 12 88 2 98 28 30 45 18 22 66 26 13 70 25 57 29 Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 2011 Mathematics Achievement. 39 41 39 41 43 26 41 25 23 41 27 40 26 24 15 32 29 7 18 31 5 27 7 25 7 5 2 9 6 0 5 32 1 6 10 6 Page 20 of 23
NAEP 2011 Grade 4 Results Percent of Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Percent Advanced All 100 34 34 25 6 Male Female National Lunch Program Eligility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an Language Learner ELL Not ELL # Rounds to zero 50 50 38 31 45 55 51 21 70 17 6 3 0 2 13 87 3 97 26 67 51 19 36 73 30 67 33 Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2011 Assessment. 33 36 32 36 37 24 29 33 31 17 36 26 35 24 26 15 33 30 7 17 33 19 8 27 7 25 6 7 2 10 7 1 3 15 14 2 7 0 7 Page 21 of 23
NAEP 2011 Grade 8 Results Percent of Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Percent Advanced All 100 23 45 29 3 Male Female National Lunch Program Eligility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an Language Learner ELL Not ELL # Rounds to zero 50 50 42 58 74 16 4 3 1 1 12 88 2 98 28 18 35 14 18 46 25 19 67 19 52 22 Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2011 Assessment. 47 43 46 44 46 43 50 27 27 46 40 45 24 35 18 37 33 10 25 39 6 31 8 30 2 4 0 4 3 0 1 14 0 3 0 3 Page 22 of 23
Grade Subject Participation Rate for with Disabilities 4 Math 8 Math 85 75 73 63 Standard Error 2.0 3.1 2.5 3.3 Participation Rate for Limited 73 93 83 79 Standard Error 3.3 2.4 4.7 4.5 Page 23 of 23