IAEA ACTIONS RELATED TO FUKUSHIMA ACCIDENT

Similar documents
IAEA ACTION PLAN ON NUCLEAR SAFETY REGARDING RADIATION PROTECTION AFTER FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI ACCIDENT

Completion of the IAEA Action Plan on Nuclear Safety and release of the report on the Fukushima Daiichi accident

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE

Emergency Preparedness and Response

15 December 2012 Fukushima Prefecture, Japan

The Fukushima Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety. Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, December 2012 CHAIRPERSON SUMMARIES

Malcolm Crick, Secretary of UNSCEAR

Nuclear Plant Emergency Response. NPP Function and Malfunction: Historical Overview. Why is this training program important to you?

IAEA Technical Meeting Amman, Jordan. Uranium Exploration and Mining Methods

Nuclear Emergency Response Drill Module D1-9

An Open Letter To IAEA

EPRINSIGHTS FOCUS: ENHANCING INFORMATION EXCHANGE FOR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE CONTENTS. Editorial

Mr. President, Mr. Director General, Distinguished Delegates, Ladies and Gentlemen,

Final Report. The 4th IAEA-MOE Experts Meeting on Environmental Remediation. Tokyo, Date City, Minamisoma City

Action Plan on Nuclear Safety

Method for internal dose estimation of workers at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station

IAEA s Technical Safety Review Services

WHO's response to the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident

Results of the Additional Re-evaluation of Committed Effective Doses of Emergency Workers at TEPCO s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

STATEMENT BY AMBASSADOR MITSURU KITANO, AMBASSADOR, PERMANENT MISSION OF JAPAN TO THE. International Organizations in Vienna

IAEA Safety Standards for Emergency Preparedness and Response: Focus on criteria for radionuclides in food, milk and drinking water

Annex V of Technical Volume 4 UNSCEAR ASSESSMENT OF THE DOSE TO THE PUBLIC

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation

Workshop on Safety Reassessment of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities in the Light of the Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident

Identification of gaps/difficulties in EP&R

2015 IAEA Report on Fukushima - Remarks. Heinz Smital, nuclear physicist at Greenpeace

Kazuo Sakai National Institute of Radiological Sciences Research Center for Radiation Protection

1. The Accident of Chernobyl Unit 4 of 1,000 MWe Graphite-Moderated Boiling Water Pressure Tube Reactor in 1986

ARTEMIS. An integrated review service for radioactive waste and spent fuel management, decommissioning and remediation programmes

Joint ICTP-IAEA School of Nuclear Energy Management August The IAEA Safety Standards. Dominique Delattre IAEA, Vienna Austria

International Atomic Energy Agency Department of Nuclear Safety and Security

Ionizing radiation. What is ionizing radiation?

Overview of Strengthened IAEA Safety Standards

Co-operative networks for international development

Nuclear Physics Activities at the IAEA Ralf Kaiser, Physics Section Head

International Conference on the Safety of Transport of Radioactive Material

Atoms for Peace and Development

The event will be held in English.

FUNDAMENTAL SAFETY OVERVIEW VOLUME 2: DESIGN AND SAFETY CHAPTER S: RISK REDUCTION CATEGORIES 3. RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF SEVERE ACCIDENTS

Waste Safety Activities Relevant to DS284, CRAFT Project

Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency in the Light of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

Allow me to explain briefly our current efforts to address the accident at the TEPCO s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.

Is there a risk of radioactive exposure from food contamination?

Dosimetry during the Chornobyl Accident

Comments of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the draft revised International Health Regulations of the World Health Organization

Thank you Mr President and good morning

Long-Term Knowledge and Information Management Following Severe Accidents

Status of the IAEA safety standards and Relation to the CRAFT project

G R E E C E. Madam President,

Iodine Prophylaxis approach in Sweden and follow-up study in Japan. Lynn Hubbard Emergency Preparedness and Response

Social impacts induced by radiation risk in Fukushima

Implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005)

Strategy for protection of the public in radiation emergency. Short version (1 hour) Draft 0.2

DANGEROUS GOODS PANEL (DGP)

Radiological Protection Countermeasures after TEPCO Fukushima NPP Accident -Who should play the role of risk communication-

Hajo Zeeb Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology BIPS, Bremen, Germany. Noboru Takamura Nagasaki University, Japan

Australian National Statement. Peace, health and prosperity. These are the goals which drive the agenda of the international community.

What is the current risk of radiation-related health problems in Japan to those near the reactor at the time, and those in other parts of Japan?

PERMANENT MISSION OF PORTUGAL VIENNA

IAEA EXPERIENCE IN ISO ACCREDITATION OF WHOLE BODY COUNTER AS PART OF THE RADIATION MONITORING AND PROTECTION

Research Report (Summary) Research on Thyroid Gland Examinations, etc. of Workers at the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

Fukushima Emergency Planning Zones, Use of Potassium Iodide, Health Effects

Design Safety and Safety Assessment Review Service (DESARS)

Protection action levels for radionuclides in foodstuffs in the context of an emergency, based on Health Canada guidance.

Nuclear accidents, environment and health in the post-fukushima era: emergency response

UNSCEAR Recent and Future Programme of Work. Emil Bédi

Thyroid Screening Survey on Children after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident

ISEMIR An IAEA Tool for Radiation Protection Optimization in Interventional Cardiology and Industrial Radiography

NUCLEARINSTALLATIONSAFETYTRAININGSUPPORTGROUP DISCLAIMER

Workshop on Derivation of Specific Clearance Levels for Materials That Are Suitable for Disposal in Landfills

Exposure Status of Workers After the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident. February 27, 2016 Mako Oshidori

IAEA TUESDAY - 22 OCTOBER 2013 TOPICAL SESSION

Radiation doses and cancer incidence (excluding thyroid cancer) due to the Chernobyl accident

MONITORING OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE AT NUCLEAR FACILITIES

Fukushima :health effects on the residents

Internal dosimetry in emergency situations: challenges and recent developments

Madam President, Director General of the IAEA Excellencies Distinguished Delegates

No 48, Second Quarter, 2014

Emergency Exercises and Training in Finland

The IAEA Technical Cooperation Programme: Sixty Years and Beyond Contributing to Development

Nuclear Power in Africa:

The IAEA and the UN family: Networks of nuclear co-operation

Global Nuclear Governance Role of the International Atomic Energy Agency

Atoms for Peace. Preparedness and Response for an Emergency during the Transport of Radioactive Material (DS469)

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: AB2282 Project Name

Updating WENRA Reference Levels for existing reactors in the light of TEPCO Fukushima Dai-ichi accident lessons learned

FORO: Enhancing Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety in Ibero-America

Medical and Health Surveillance in Post-Accident Recovery: Lessons learned in Fukushima

Radiation physics and radiation protection. University of Szeged Department of Nuclear Medicine

CHALLENGES FOR NEW COMERS IN REGULATING NUCLEAR SECURITY

nuclear science and technology

WORKERS IN A NUCLEAR FACILITY

GUIDE TO THE APPLICATION TO POSSESS AND USE A SOURCE(S) FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS

World Association of Nuclear Operators. A stronger need for safety, a stronger need for WANO

VO Kernenergie und Umwelt TU Graz. Eileen Langegger,

STABLE IODINE DISTRIBUTION BRIEFING SESSION

IAEA Safeguards Agreements and Additional Protocols. Verifying Compliance with Nuclear Non-Proliferation Undertakings

Training Course. Preparation, conduct and evaluation of exercises to test preparedness for a nuclear or radiological emergency COURSE MANUAL

Technical Meeting on Quality Assurance and Quality Control Activities in Nuclear Power Plants: Lessons Learned and Good Practices

Transcription:

IAEA ACTIONS RELATED TO FUKUSHIMA ACCIDENT Rodolfo Cruz Suárez Radiation Safety and Monitoring Section Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency

Agenda IAEA role within UN system. Joint Emergency Plan. Summary of IAEA actions (IEC & Missions) IAEA Radiation monitoring at Fukushima & Tokyo. Issue related to the worker monitoring & Road Map. Ministerial Conference on NS & Action PlaN IAEA 2

UN& IAEA United Nations System (1945) 192 Member States Trusteeship Council (before 1994) Security Council General Assembly Economic and Social Council International Court of Justice Secretariat UNEP IAEA (1957) Main Committees UNDP UN Specialized secretariat independent international organization related Agencies: FAO (1945) to the UN system UNSCEAR UNSCEAR (1955) UNEP UNESCO (1945) 151 Member States ILO (1946) Secretariat ICAO (1947) IMO (1948) In terms of its Statute, the IAEA: WHO (1948) (a) reports annually to the UN General Other UN WMO (1951) World Bank Group (1956): Assembly and, when appropriate, Programmes IBRD, IFC, IDA, MIGA, ICSID (b) to the Security Council on matters relating and Funds UNIDO (1966) to international peace and security and others (c) submit reports to the UN Economic and Social Council and other UN organs of on matters within the competence of these Other independent international organization related to the UN system: WTO - World Trade Organization organs. ICC - International Criminal Court ISA - International Seabed Authority ITLOS - International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Standby High-Readiness Brigade - The UN's standing military force UNSOG - Special Operations Group IAEA 3

International EPR Framework Overview Legal instruments Tools IAEA Protocols Safety Standards Tools, protocols and operational arrangements States Legal instruments Standards International Org. Operational arrangements IAEA 4

International EPR Framework Legal instruments IAEA 5

International EPR Framework Safety Standards IAEA 6

International EPR Framework Protocols and operational arrangements REPLIE Protocols ENATOM IAEA JPLAN States RANET International Org. IAEA 7

IAEA Roles and Responsibilities Provision i of assistance on request: Facilitate and coordinate Provision of public information: Timely, accurate and appropriate Coordination of inter-agency response: Achieve synergy, speak with one voice IAEA 8

Joint Radiation Emergency Management Plan (cont.) IAEA 9

05:46 UTC Response to Fukushima Accident 11 March Earthquake of magnitude 9.0 occurred near East coast of Honshu, Japan 06:42 UTC On-call external event specialist informed/alerted on-call ERM about earthquake Possible damage at 4 NPPs and potential for tsunami anticipated 07:21 UTC IEC made first phone contact with METI- NISA IAEA 10

11 March 07:48 UTC Offer of Agency s assistance sent to METI-NISA Japan (cc PM of Japan to IAEA) 08:06 UTC First EMERCON message for MSs and IGOs published on ENAC web site 08:20 UTC IEC declares Full response mode operations IAEA 11

IAEA 12

IAEA 13

IAEA 14

Incident and Emergency Centre (IEC) Global focal point for international preparedness and response for nuclear and radiological safety or security related incidents, emergencies, threats or events of media interest and for coordination of international assistance IAEA 15

11 March 08:30 UTC First IAEA s press statement published on IAEA web site 09:29 UTC First request for information from MS 09:33 UTC First info to MS provided by phone IAEA 16

09:39 UTC 11 March First IEC request to WMO s Regional Specialized Meteorological Centres for standard meteorological products 10:39 UTC First fax to METI requesting detailed info info on declaration of emergency 12:50 16:47 UTC First replies to inquiries from MSs sent by e-mails 17:03 UTC including class Fifth EMERCON message published; confirmation of reading requested Emails were sent in parallel to all existing primary and primary back up email addresses IAEA 17

11 March 19:38 UTC First IEC Status Summary Report distributed by fax to all CPs 20:02 UTC First IEC Status Summary Report published on ENAC First IEC Status t Summary Report 1 page IAEA 18

March 11- June 20 More than 110 Status Summary Reports prepared Monitoring data gathered from 37 Member States IAEA Status Summary Report on June 21 24 pages 19

Reporting to MS IAEA 20

IAEA 21

Fukushima Daiichi NPP 1.0E+00 Dose Rate and Radioactivity Concentration in Air at Fukushima Daiichi West Gate 160 140 I 131 Volatile 120 1.0E 02 100 Cs 137 Volatile Bq/cm 3 1.0E 04 80 60 µsv/hr I 131 Particulate Cs 137 Particulate 40 Dose rate 20 1.0E 06 0 IAEA

General Monitoring Data 10000 External Gamma Dose Rate (nsv/h) on 18 May 2011 at 09:00 UTC in the 47 Perfectures Log scale 1600 our) nsv/h (nanosievert per ho 1000 100 98 10 1 IAEA

Sea Monitoring Data IAEA 24

Food Monitoring Data IAEA 25

Regional radiological data and zoning Cs-134 and Cs-137 Deposition Planned Evacuation Zones Emergency Evacuation Preparation Zones IAEA 26

March 11 June 20 Oral briefings for MSs, press briefings have been provided and Update Briefs posted on IAEA s web site IAEA 27

March 11- June 20 MSs offers for assistance gathered, provided to Japan and published on ENAC web site IAEA 28

March 11- June 20 Information on soft countermeasures in MSs have been gathered, evaluated by OECD/NEA and made available on ENAC web site IAEA 29

March 11- June 20 ENAC web site Ati Actively used: Close to 10.000 visits with more that 1.8 million hits More than 110 EMERCON messages (mostly from Japan) received and published More than 1300 documents published: More than 1000 from Japan 31 from MSs 74 from WMO 110 Status Summary Reports IAEA 30

Inter-agency Coordination IACRNE and JPLAN March 11 - IGOs notified and JPLAN activated t March 15 - first IACRNE coordination video meeting conducted: Briefings, exchange of information, coordination of response activities, joint press releases, assignment of commonly agreed activities 13 coordination video meetings since March 11 Liaison officers working in IEC: Staff members of FAO and WHO, experts from WMO IAEA 31

Lessons from Response International EPR framework IAEA s Incident and Emergency System proved to work well overall IAEA can respond 24/7 for sustained period 54 days around the clock first time in Agency s history IAEA s existing/formal role in sharing of information largely limited to distributing information validated by State concerned IAEA s existing/formal role in response appears not to be in line with perceived/expected role IAEA 32

Way Forward International a EPR framework Role oeof IAEA in EPR requires es broadening of responsibilities: To conduct analysis of emergency conditions, progression (possible scenarios of crisis development), consequences and associated radiological impact, and response actions during course of an emergency To expand information sharing with MSs including results of those analysis IAEA 33

Other IAEA Actions Director general s visit to Tokyo, the Agency s on-the-ground support to Japan became operational A senior Agency official was deployed in Japan to coordinate the IAEA s assistance activities; The Japanese authorities agreed to the designation of two IAEA liaison officers to work closely with the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) 24 hours per day; The Agency s radiation monitoring team began sending back measurements to Vienna, including from locations close to the Fukushima site. IAEA 34

Fukushima Accident Coordination Team Fukushima Accident Coordination Team (FACT) was formed within the Agency Fukushima Nuclear Safety Team (FNST) Fuel, reactor, Rad. Water treatment. t t Fukushima Radiological Consequences Team (FRCT) IAEA

The Structure of FRCT FRCT Director, NSRW Rapporteur Proehl Data Analysis and Evaluation Dose Assessment for the Public Radiation Protection Aspects Monitoring and measurements Dose Assessment for Workers Radiation Protection Aspects Transport related issues Marine Environment Decommissioning Remediation and Waste Management WES Vesterlind (Proehl, Berkovskyy, Telleria and coworkers) RSM Czarwinski ( and co - workers ) RIT Al-Khatibeh (Stewart) To be decided in accordance with MEL, Monaco WES Vesterlind (DRU, RWSFMU (Rowat, Bruno) IAEA 36

IAEA Labs Actions Activities iti of the IAEA laboratories: IAEA Marine Environmental Studies Laboratory, Monaco Nuclear Applications Environmental Laboratories,Seibersdorf Radiation Monitoring and Protection Services Laboratories, Vienna IAEA 37

Missions to Japan 1. Radiological monitoring teams (March 18 to April 18) 2. Boiling water reactor expert team. (April) 3. Marine monitoring team (April) 4. Joint IAEA/FAO Food safety assessment team (March) 5. International Fact-Finding Expert mission (May) IAEA

IAEA Radiation Monitoring Teams Objectives : To perform environmental monitoring of the releases of the Fukushima Daiichi NPP and in Tokyo and surroundings, in order to verify the data provided by the Japanese. To provide independent IAEA monitoring results. To provide trend analysis for different parameters at each location when number of monitoring points would allow. IAEA 39

Scope Dose rate, Surface activity concentration Collection of different samples(air, smears, soil, vegetation, water, etc..) In-situ gamma spectra for selected locations From 20 Km to around 80 of Fukushima Daiichi NPP and in Tokyo o surroundings IAEA 40

IAEA Monitoring Routes

IAEA 42

IAEA 43

IAEA measurements - Route D Dose rate (µsv/h) 4 3,5 3 Dose ra ate (µsv/h) 2,5 2 1,5 1 Yamane (30 km NW) Tokiwa (33 km W) Nishimuki (36 km W) Funehiki (38 km W) Kassenjo Sakura (41 km W) 0,5 0 23.03.2011 24.03.2011 28.03.2011 01.04.2011 05.04.2011 11.04.2011 IAEA Measurement Error =20%

IAEA measurements - Route D Surface Activity Concentration (MBq/m 2 ) 0,35 0,3 Su urf Activity conc. (MBq/m 2 ) 0,25 02 0,2 0,15 0,1 005 0,05 Yamane (30 km NW) Tokiwa (33 km W) Nishimuki (36 km W) Funehiki (38 km W) Kassenjo Sakura (41 km W) 0 23.03.2011 24.03.2011 28.03.2011 01.04.2011 05.04.2011 11.04.2011 IAEA Measurement Error =20%

In Situ Object Counting System software package developed by Canberra Industries (SG- Portable & Resident NDA) Spectral Analysis I131I, 132I, 132Te, 134Cs, 136Cs, 137Cs, 129m Te, 129 Te, 99 Mo, 99mTc, 140 Ba, 140 La IAEA 46

In Situ Object Counting System software package developed by Canberra Industries (SG- Portable & Resident NDA) IAEA 47

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency

Air filters & smears sampling and measurement IAEA 49

Backpack data- NSL (All routes-ft2) IAEA 50

IAEA 51

As a follow up actions: Part II of this report will contain the results of the analysis of all samples collected in the field. Part III will present a comparison and validation of the IAEA monitoring results in comparison with the Japanese data collected at the same locations. IAEA 52

IAEA 53

Evaluation Status t of Site Workers' Exposure Doses during Emergency Work at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station IAEA 54

J Village (March 17) A soccer training i facility located at a point about 20 km south of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS, utilized as a place for preparing workers for entry into Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS, where they put on their protective equipment, and performed decontamination tests when leaving, etc. Due to the high concentration of radioactive materials over the entire site of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS, TEPCO requires workers to wear Tyvek and other protection clothes, gloves, and protection masks. It also requires appropriate protective ti clothes (anoraks, etc.), rubber gloves, and shoe covers taking into consideration weather conditions and contamination levels of the work sites. Dose limit for workers during emergency at FD NPS - 250 msv IAEA 55

IAEA 56

TEPCO- Press Release (Jun 13,2011) External Dose APD at the site for leader of operational groups. APD for all workers after April 1. DMS as April 14. Transit doses not included (?) IAEA 57

TEPCO- Press Release (Jun 13,2011) Internal Dose On site Whole Body Counter - unusable! Mobile Whole Body Counter and other facilities. Intake Assumption - acute exposure at the time start t to work - conservative! No information on radionuclides. Hearing to be organized when situation allow. For high doses additional investigations by JAEA IAEA 58

External Dose Internal Dose IAEA 59

Combined External & Internal Dose IAEA 60

IAEA 61

Summary of workers doses March 24 2 workers - equivalent doses of their skin, it is estimated to less than 2 to 3 Sv. April 27- female employee had been exposed to more than 5 msv over a period of 3 months (above the limit) May 31- Self-Defense Forces working within 30 km of Fukushima Daiichi NPS- All below the relevant limits. May 31 - Fire fighting teams working within 20 km of Fukushima Daiichi NPS All below the relevant limits May 30 Iodine intake Worker A: 678mSv (external exposure 88mSv, internal exposure 590mSv) Worker B: 643mSv (external exposure 103mSv, internal exposure 540mSv) IAEA 62

IAEA 63

IAEA 64

IAEA

IAEA

MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR SAFETY Preliminary Assessment of the Fukushima Accident and Actions for Safety Improvements Emergency Preparedness and Response The Global Nuclear Safety Framework IAEA

Topics discussed Strengthening the IAEA Safety Standards Safety Reviews & International Peer Reviews Role of Organizations in Nuclear Safety Receiving and Disseminating Information International Emergency Preparedness and Response Framework. National and Regional Emergency Preparedness and Response Inter-agency Emergency Preparedness and Response IAEA

Topics discussed Regulatory Independence Newcomer Countries Safety research on fuel performance and accident progression Operating Experience Remediation of contaminated land areas Transparency in dealing with safety related issues is an important component in building public confidence IAEA

Declaration IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety Request DG to report - detailed d action plan covering all the relevant aspects relating to: Nuclear safety, Emergency preparedness and response and, Radiation protection of people and the environment, International legal framework IAEA

IAEA

Thank you! IAEA