Collaboration Between WIC and EHDI to Improve Follow-Up of Newborn Hearing Screening in Greater Cincinnati

Similar documents
screening improved loss to follow-up rates, decreased the age at hearing confirmation by 1 month, and addressed reported care barriers.

Lessons Learned Through a Recent Connecticut EHDI Program - Diagnostic Audiology Center Collaboration: One Small Change at a Time

COACHingto improve NHS Outcomes: Coalition of Ohio Audiologists and Childrens Hospitals

MINNESOTA EARLY HEARING DETECTION AND INTERVENTION (EHDI) PROGRAM. EHDI Goals, Indicators and Benchmarks

Risk Factors for Late-Onset Hearing Loss in Children

JFK-HCP Webinar - Partnering to Support Children with Hearing Loss - 2/27/14 1

Historical Perspective. JCIH 1973 Position Statement. JCIH Goals. JCIH 1982 Position Statement

5. Hospitals will provide the family with a copy of the Michigans Community Program: Information for Parents (MDCH /01). Copies can be ordered,

A. Executive Summary:

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI): The Role of the Medical Home

The Tennessee EHDI Information System

Response to the Language Equality and Acquisition for Deaf Kids (LEAD-K) Task Force Report

The Fiscal Impact of Lost to Documentation of Newborn Hearing Screening in Oklahoma s County Health Departments

Progress in Standardization of Reporting and Analysis of Data from Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) Programs

Trends across the country. Indiana Early Hearing Detection 4/13/2015

Newborn Screening Free health checks for your baby. Newborn. Hearing Screening. Referral to Audiologist

Michael Macione, AuD; & Cheryl DeConde Johnson, EdD

Indiana Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI)

Newborn Hearing Screening: Success and Challenges

PROJECT NARRATIVE. Figure 1: Number of children who did not pass their hearing screen and subsequent results for 2011.

Developing the Medical Home Approach in EHDI. Albert Mehl, M.D. Vickie Thomson, Ph.D.

Using Virtual Technology to Fully Implement EHDDI (Early Hearing Detection, Diagnosis and Intervention) in Rural Settings

Appendix C NEWBORN HEARING SCREENING PROJECT

California Newborn Hearing Screening Program: Tracking Our Babies

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Tracking Research and Integration with Other Newborn Screening Programs

About North Carolina Data. Population 9,382,609 Live Births = 128,180 Children Identified with Hearing Loss = 201

Guam Early Hearing Detection and Intervention

OUTCOMES OF CHILDREN WHO ARE HARD OF HEARING

Impact of the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program on the Detection of Hearing Loss at Birth Michigan,

RESPONSE TO THE LANGUAGE EQUALITY AND ACQUISITION FOR DEAF KIDS (LEAD K) TASK FORCE REPORT

Reducing Lost to Follow Up Percentages In EHDI Programs: The Role of Audiology

I. Project Identifier Information

GUAM. Newborn Hearing At-A-Glance. Guam EHDI Progress Report. Håfa Ådai! January - December 2012

Newborn Screening Free health checks for your baby. Newborn. Hearing Screening. Your Baby s Hearing Screen

Hearing loss is the most frequently occurring congenital

Michael Macione, AuD, & Cheryl DeConde Johnson, EdD. a critical link within the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) process.

Advocacy through Legislation. Utah s Congenital Cytomegalovirus Public Health Initiative

Newborn Screening and Middle Ear Problems

Kansas Successful Strategies in Reducing Loss to Follow-Up/Loss to Documentation

IHN-CCO DST Final Report and Evaluation

Recommended practices for family-centered early intervention with families who have infants and toddlers who are deaf or hard of hearing

Minnesota Early Hearing Detection & Intervention Annual Report for 2012 Data

CHILDREN WITH CMV: DON T FORGET THE IMPORTANCE OF EARLY INTERVENTION. Paula Pittman, PhD Director, Utah Parent Infant Program for the Deaf

Iowa EHDI A Work in Progress. Coordinating Council for Hearing Services November 24, 2008

Improving Loss to Follow-up Rates Diagnostic Center Guidelines for 2011

Factors Associated with Newborn Hearing Screening Follow-up

The Guam EHDI Story. University of Guam Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research, and Service (Guam CEDDERS)

Children labeled medically complex enrolled in Early Intervention. Susan Wiley, MD Jareen Meinzen-Derr, PhD Dan Choo, MD

TENNESSEE EHDI WORK PLAN

Executive Summary. JCIH Year 2007 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs

The impact of language underperformance on social and communication functioning in children with cochlear implants

Infant Hearing Program Service Levels and Funding in Toronto

A PARENT S GUIDE TO DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING EARLY INTERVENTION RECOMMENDATIONS

the time is now: wisconsin s journey towards improving early intervention services

AR UNHS (2014) H61MC Introduction

OAE Screening in Healthcare Settings: A Pilot Project. Terry E. Foust, AuD William Eiserman, PhD Lenore Shisler, MS

Dr Claudine Störbeck and Selvarani Moodley (MA Audiology) The University of the Witwatersrand The Centre for Deaf Studies

Reduce refused screening by identifying facilities who have families who refuse 4/14 12/14 PD,CC, FOS, QIT, EPI,OS, LTFS

Jackson Roush, PhD University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

Trends and Opportunities from EI SNAPSHOT: Lessons learned from families, providers, and EI systems

Newborn Hearing Screening Protocol (CG570)

How Wheaton Franciscan is meeting the NEEDS of our community. NSWERING HE CALL

The Whole Child: Hearing Screening and Identification in Children who are Deaf/Hard of Hearing. Rachel St. John, MD, NCC, NIC-A

How Do We Support Families in 2010?

NEWBORN SCREENING PRENATAL CURRICULUM

Congenital CMV (ccmv) Initiatives Across the United States: A Panel Discussion

Inconsistency in Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programmes: a Systematic Review

Instructions. 1. About how many babies are born or admitted to this hospital each year?

SCREENINGS. Language re-screenings are required for Head Start/Early Head Start students who fail the classroom-based language screener (AccuScreen).

April 24, 2014 Questions and Answers

Day-to-Day Activities

What is the Role of the Hearing Specialist in Early Steps? Karen Anderson, PhD Coordinator of Early Intervention Services for Hearing and Vision

Until January 2002, the universal screening programme

Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening in The Netherlands. Bert van Zanten Audiological Center of the University Medical Center Utrecht

Melissa Wake Director, Research & Public Health Centre for Community Child Health

HEALTH VISITOR INFORMATION PACK

Avg. age of diagnosis 3 mo. majority range.5-5 mo range 1-7 mo range 6-12 mo

A SUPPLEMENT TO AUDIOLOGY TODAY NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2007

Hearing Screening, Diagnostics and Intervention

Wisconsin Sound Beginnings Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Annual Report 2015

II. EI and Audiology Sirect Service Provider Perceptions via surveys with EI providers and

ROADMAP TO SPOKEN LANGUAGE C H R I S T I N E Y O S H I N A G A - I T A N O, P H. D. U N I V E R S I T Y O F C O L O R A D O, B O U L D E R

Just What Do Your Pediatric Audiologists Know?

Universal Newborn. Your baby has referred for another Hearing Screening or Diagnostic Hearing Test

Map of Medicine National Library for Health

Audiology in an interdisciplinary context: Takeaways from the 2018 Early Hearing Detection and Intervetnion (EHDI) Annual Meeting

KIDSNET and RITRACK... Partnering for Audiological Reporting

Making Connections: Early Detection Hearing and Intervention through the Medical Home Model Podcast Series

Baptist Health Jacksonville Community Health Needs Assessment Implementation Plans. Health Disparities. Preventive Health Care.

This article shall be known, and may be cited as, the Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening, Tracking and Intervention Act.

EHDI National EHDI Meeting

Teaching Hearing Loss Prevention to Audiology Graduate Students and the Community:

How Does Your EHDI Intervention System Measure Up? States Experiences Using the JCIH EHDI System Self-Assessment

EnginEars - the hearing implant program for kids

Innovation in the Oral Health Service Delivery System

Understanding the Response of Parents to Newborn Hearing Screening

Accomplishments and Barriers

Joint Standing Committee on the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) The Provision of Hearing Services under the NDIS

Hear Now! ND EHDI Announces the release of North Dakota s Early Intervention Module. Inside this issue:

universal newborn hearing Screening

Transcription:

Collaboration Between WIC and EHDI to Improve Follow-Up of Newborn Hearing Screening in Greater Cincinnati Lisa Hunter, Ph.D., Scott Wexelblatt, M.D. Jareen Meinzen-Derr, Ph.D., Susan Wiley, M.D. Laura Rolfes, B.S., Sara Di Stefano, AuD Candidate

Disclosure Statement Lisa L. Hunter, PhD, Laura Rolfes, BS, Sara DiStefano, AuD Candidate Cincinnati Children s Hospital Medical Center Neither we nor any member of our immediate families have a financial relationship or interest (currently or within the past 12 months) with any entity producing, marketing, re-selling, or distributing health goods or services consumed by, or used on, patients. We do not intend to discuss an unapproved/ investigative use of a commercial product/device.

Acknowledgements Funding: Place Award from Cincinnati Children s Hospital Centers for Disease Control Disability Research Center Development Grant Families of Participants and Stakeholders Collaborators: Dr. Daniel Choo, EHDI Advisor Reena Kothari, Ohio Department of Health Cindy Meale, Butler County WIC Betsy Buchanan, Hamilton County WIC

Outline of Presentation Challenge of Loss to Follow-Up (LTFU) Place Award study in Butler County CDC study in Hamilton County Lessons Learned Keys to Success Participatory Action Research Model Stakeholder Focus Groups

Loss To Follow-up in the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data from 2011 indicated 35% of children in the US with failed newborn hearing screening were lost to follow-up or lost to documentation for diagnosis. Range of LTFU is 3% to 83% across 50 states. States with the most well-developed EHDI programs report 2.5:1000 with permanent hearing loss but many states report far fewer because of loss to follow-up. 26% of infants with documented hearing loss could not be confirmed as having intervention services.

Progress on Loss to Follow-up and Diagnosis of PHL http://www.cdc.gov/features/dsinfanthearingloss/index.html By 2010, LFU/LTD among babies not passing the screening had decreased to approximately 39.4.%. In 2010, over 4,900 babies were diagnosed with hearing loss, nearly double the number reported in 2005.

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) In Ohio http://www.helpmegrow.ohio.gov Ohio mandated universal newborn hearing screening in 2002; full implementation was in 2004 135 birthing hospitals in Ohio, 140K births 98.6% of all Ohio infants are now screened at birth (ODH, 2012) Prevalence of hearing loss = 1.5 per thousand

2012 Data: Ohio NHS and EHDI Regional Infant Hearing Program (RIHP) Cincinnati Courtesy of Reena Kothari, AuD Ohio Department of Health NHSP 139,628 Births 137,711 Screened (98.6%) 3945 Non Pass (2.9%) 2334 Normal Hearing (59.2%) 213 Hearing Loss (5.4%) 1254 Lost to Follow-up (31.8%) 144 In Process (3.7%)

Two-Stage Screening Test Performance Based on Ohio Data (2012) False Positive Rate = Number passed diagnostic False Positive Rate = 2.6% Number screened Positive Predictive Value = Number passed diagnostic Positive Predictive Value = 8.4% Number Referred

Reasons for Incomplete Follow-up Socioeconomic: Transportation, insurance, language, convenience Education: Understanding reasons for a failed screen and what to do, lack of support by other health providers to follow-up Systems: Poor integration of screening, diagnostic and intervention systems Variable hospital refer rates: From 1% to 15% depending on protocol and training Documentation: Follow-up may occur, but not be reported to state Significance of Result: Downplayed (may be just fluid, temporary, tests may be inaccurate)

WIC-EHDI Collaboration Study Primary Aim: Reduce loss to follow-up rate for infants failing the newborn screening at the birth hospital and requiring rescreening Secondary Aim: Shorten the length of time to diagnosis and subsequent intervention for those diagnosed with PHL. JCIH 1/3/6 Guidelines 1 month to rescreening - 3 months to diagnosis - 6 months to intervention

Why Women Infant Children (WIC)? WIC provides lactation and nutrition support to eligible lower income mothers and their children under age 5 years. Approx. 50% of all newborns are eligible for WIC services, located close to home Factors that are associated with poorer follow-up are addressed by WIC (transportation, convenience, cost, familiarity) Lower socioeconomic strata has higher incidence of hearing loss

Study Facilities Birth Hospitals Butler County Ft. Hamilton Hospital in Hamilton OH: ~650 births/year Mercy Hospital in Fairfield, OH: ~2200 births/year At 2% referral rate, expect 57 referrals per year total, 50% WIC eligible = 28 per year. Good Samaritan Hospital in Cincinnati s birth rate is ~ 6500/year WIC Offices Butler County WIC West: 330 total caseload (women, infants children) Butler County WIC Bever Pavilion: 5440 total caseload

Process of Re-screening for Intervention Group Table 1. Subject and Information Flow Diagram Infant REFERS on UNHS Consent and enrollment ODH/EDHI Rescreen ABR performed at WIC Results sent to PCP CCHMC FU Nurse Hospital (optional) PASS REFER ODH/EDHI Diagnostic eval performed by Audiology Results sent to PCP study tracks results in EPIC MR

A-ABR Testing in WIC Clinics Testing in Mom s arms Trained technician can use automatic interpretation While nursing or bottle feeding Infant in natural sleep No need for sedation Successful in our experience up to 5 months old

Results 33 infants enrolled Race & Ethnicity Mom s Education 80 60 40 20 0 50 40 30 20 10 0 < High School HS Graduate Some college College degree Post Graduate 60 40 20 0 Barriers Reported Public Insurance: 94% Hearing Risk Factors: 15% Mom in School: 15%

Age at follow-up improved from 3.7 m before program to 0.7 m after program Study Implemented

Loss to Follow-up Comparisons Eligible WIC Referrals = 33/36 (92% follow-up) Diagnostic Follow-up 5/5 (100% follow-up) Could not be contacted or moved = 3/36 (8%) No refusals (0%) Cincinnati Area Loss to Follow-up Baseline Data (2010): Hospital 1: 45% Hospital 2: 50% Hospital 3: 33% Hospital 4: 64%

Tracking of Infants who Failed Re-screen Age at WIC rescreen Attended Diagnostic Eval? Age at Diagnostic Eval Age at 2nd Diagnostic Eval Additional Visit Required? Diagnosis 12 weeks yes 19 weeks 5.5 mo Yes, completed Normal hearing bilaterally 4 weeks yes 5 weeks 2 mo Yes, completed Normal hearing bilaterally 1 week yes 4 weeks 2 mo Yes, completed Normal hearing bilaterally 1 week yes 4 weeks 2 mo Yes, completed Normal hearing bilaterally 3 weeks yes 5 weeks 4 mo Yes, completed Mild to mod conductive in right. Mixed hearing loss left

Centers for Disease Control Grant, Funded September 1, 2013-2015 Targeted to Hamilton County WIC Modeled after current WIC re-screening project in Butler County. Hamilton County has the largest number of referred newborn screening cases reported to the Ohio Department of Health and represents a needy demographic. Our hypothesis is that the WIC hearing re-screen program will significantly decrease the time between the hospital hearing screening and diagnostic evaluation. We will also ascertain the time to intervention for any children identified with hearing loss by following children after diagnosis to track time to enrollment in early intervention.

Butler County Hamilton County Target Hospitals Mercy Hospital of Fairfield Ft. Hamilton Hospital Target Hospitals Good Samaritan Hospital University Hospital WIC Offices Bever Pavilion West WIC Offices Roselawn, pilot Four others

Hamilton County Intervention and Comparison Hospitals Hospitals Annual Deliveries Refer Rate (%) NHS Referral s (N) LTFU rate (%) Medicai d/ WIC (%) Study eligible referrals (N) Comparison 1 3055 11.3% 337 45% 50% 168 Intervention 1 2298 10.6% 274 50% 80% 219 Comparison 2 4141 3.0% 133 33% 50% 67 Intervention 2 6385 2.2% 174 64% 80% 139 Total Comparison 7196 6.5% 470 41.7% 50% 235 Total Intervention 8643 5.2% 448 55.4% 80% 160

Target WIC Locations to Offer Re- Screening *Infant mortality rate per 1,000 live births. US = 5.9/1000 for 2013.

Teamwork: Identifying Study Subjects Laura Rolfes Study Coordinator Hospital Hearing Screeners Study Staff Neonatal FU Team WIC Staff

Keys to Success: Partnering with WIC Often WIC knows about the referral first We can rescreen babies at WIC as early as a few days old Additional opportunities to combine rescreen with WIC visit Combining rescreen/wic visit = less No Shows Dedicated staff, comfortable surroundings, privacy Already have available Spanish translators

Barriers to Following Up During data collection: Few reported In casual conversation: Barriers revealed Examples Some LTFU Risk Great LTFU Risk Definite LTFU

Parents Reactions Appreciation for convenient/free rescreening Relieved If baby passes They have fulfilled responsibility Study takes care of paperwork Receive help if baby refers on rescreen Rescreen results discussed Appointment made immediately after rescreen referral with parent present Coordinator can explain what will happen at the appointment 100% attendance at follow-up appointments

Direct Impacts of Study Prevention of infants from falling between the cracks of the newborn hearing screening system. LTFU rate from ~60% in Butler County prior to study initiation to ~10% after Significantly shorten time to follow-up for rescreen Shorten time to follow-up to diagnostic evaluation The closer we come to100% follow-up rate, the better able we are to improve outcomes for all infants with congenital hearing loss.

Indirect Results of Study Relief for parents - of anxiety around possibility of deafness - for having fulfilled parental responsibility - can proceed with intervention expeditiously Frees space/time in diagnostic system Helps WIC extend relationship with clients (i.e. become more of a medical home)

Lessons Learned The AABR technology incorporated is easily portable and useful outside of the sound booth. Reduction of Loss to Follow-up is a team effort. Parents really DO want to follow up. Hearing rescreening at WIC appears thus far to be an effective model for decreasing loss to follow-up.

Qualitative Outcomes Laura Rolfes WIC, ODH and hospitals very supportive Have pledged support for the expanded project and provided data on follow-up rates through state database This data will be crucial to determine if we are having a significant impact in LTFU rates and time to intervention Some of the infants found thus far have been >3 months due to catch up efforts These infants were then resolved and no longer are LTFU.

Participatory Action Research Sara DiStefano Participants included a group of ~30 stakeholders used to gather information about the NHS system in Cincinnati and the surrounding suburbs Parents, audiologists, physicians, speech-language pathologists, and birth hospital screeners Policy partners attended: Ohio Maternal and Child Health - Regional Infant Hearing Program and Help me Grow Ohio Department of Health Women, Infant and Children (WIC) program, Hamilton County Ohio Valley Voices Oral school for Deaf children St. Rita School for the Deaf

Group Level Assessment

Main Themes NHS System Gaps Emotional Factors Families Consistency Communication

Themes NHS is a complex system: lack of standard of care for followup, lack of global awareness, lack of consistency, and lack of communication and understanding among all involved in the process. Emotional Factors: Fear, Education, Motivation, Culture Communication: A clearer message needs to be delivered by working together to meet one common goal Public awareness, Ownership, Partners, Resources Families: Improvement in the NHS process will not be seen without support from families Participation, Communication, Education, Partnership

Next Steps Based on the thoughts and ideas generated during the group level assessment, community members, health professionals, and academic partners will continue to come together and collaborate to generate plans and ideas that will help to compensate for the barriers that many individuals face in the NHS process. Individual action groups will be developed at a next meeting to begin work on most-needed areas.