Dyslipidemia in women: Who should be treated and how?

Similar documents
JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

Calculating RR, ARR, NNT

Statins for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Women: Review of the Evidence

Macrovascular Residual Risk. What risk remains after LDL-C management and intensive therapy?

THE ESC/EAS LIPID GUIDELINES IN THE ELDERLY

LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular outcomes?

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

Case Presentation. Rafael Bitzur The Bert W Strassburger Lipid Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer

Inflammation and and Heart Heart Disease in Women Inflammation and Heart Disease

ATP IV: Predicting Guideline Updates

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

Controversies in Preventative Cardiology

HDL-C. J Jpn Coll Angiol, 2008, 48: NIPPON DATA80, MEGA study, JELIS, dyslipidemia, risk assessment chart

Diabetes Mellitus: A Cardiovascular Disease

What have We Learned in Dyslipidemia Management Since the Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline?

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

CLINICAL OUTCOME Vs SURROGATE MARKER

New ACC/AHA Guidelines on Lipids: Are PCSK9 Inhibitors Poised for a Breakthrough?

How to Reduce Residual Risk in Primary Prevention

Dyslipidemia: Lots of Good Evidence, Less Good Interpretation.

Is Lower Better for LDL or is there a Sweet Spot

Environmental. Vascular / Tissue. Metabolics

Lipid Management C. Samuel Ledford, MD Interventional Cardiology Chattanooga Heart Institute

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

The Clinical Debates

Ten Year Risk for CVD Event by Systolic HTN and CVD Risk Factors (Where s Age?)

The Diabetes Link to Heart Disease

LDL and the Benefits of Statin Therapy

Approach to Dyslipidemia among diabetic patients

1. Which one of the following patients does not need to be screened for hyperlipidemia:

2016 EUROPEAN GUIDELINES ON CVD PREVENTION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Fasting or non fasting?

Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute Symposium 2015

Weintraub, W et al NEJM March Khot, UN et al, JAMA 2003

An example of a systematic review and meta-analysis

CRP for the Clinician

ESC/EAS GUIDELINES ON MANAGEMENT OF DYSLIPIDEMIAS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

There are many ways to lower triglycerides in humans: Which are the most relevant for pancreatitis and for CV risk?

How would you manage Ms. Gold

Andrew Cohen, MD and Neil S. Skolnik, MD INTRODUCTION

9/29/2015. Primary Prevention of Heart Disease: Objectives. Objectives. What works? What doesn t?

Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo

Coronary Heart Disease in Women Go Red for Women

Treatment of Cardiovascular Risk Factors. Kevin M Hayes D.O. F.A.C.C. First Coast Heart and Vascular Center

Is it an era for statin for life?

ESC Geoffrey Rose Lecture on Population Sciences Cholesterol and risk: past, present and future

Felix Vallotton Ball (1899) LDL-C management in Asian diabetes: moderate vs. high intensity statin --- a lesson from EMPATHY study

Considerations and Controversies in the Management of Dyslipidemia for ASCVD Risk Reduction

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

JAMA. 2011;305(24): Nora A. Kalagi, MSc

Dyslipidemia in the light of Current Guidelines - Do we change our Practice?

2/9/2017. Financial Disclosures/Unapproved Use. Achieving Harmony in Blood Pressure Guidelines Around the Globe. Roger S. Blumenthal, MD.

Do Women Benefit From Statins for Primary Prevention?: Controversy, Challenges and Consensus

An update on lipidology and cardiovascular risk management. Lipids, Metabolism & Vascular Risk Section - Royal Society of Medicine

CVD Risk Assessment. Lipid Management in Women: Lessons Learned. Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Current Knowledge, Future Directions

Estrogens vs Testosterone for cardiovascular health and longevity

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Calculating the CVD Risk Score: Which Tool for Which Patient?

STATIN THERAPY IN THE ELDERLY: THERE ARE MILES TO GO BEFORE WE SLEEP

New Paradigms in Predicting CVD Risk

Lipid Management: A Case-Based Approach. Overview. Simple Lipid Therapy Approach. Patients have lipid disorders of:

Prevenzione cardiovascolare e cambiamento degli stili di vita. Gian Franco Gensini

Preventive Cardiology Scientific evidence

well-targeted primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: an underused high-value intervention?

ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias

Eugene Barrett M.D., Ph.D. University of Virginia 6/18/2007. Diagnosis and what is it Glucose Tolerance Categories FPG

2013 ACC AHA LIPID GUIDELINE JAY S. FONTE, MD

Women s Heart Health: Risk, Diagnosis and Management Differences MANAGEMENT

Supplementary appendix

Landmark Clinical Trials.

Young high risk patients the role of statins Dr. Mohamed Jeilan

Supplementary Online Content

2017 Cardiovascular Summit for Primary Care Thursday 30th & Friday 31st March Crowne Plaza, Dublin

Update in Hypertension

Inflammation as A Target for Therapy. Focus on Residual Inflammatory Risk

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 6 October 2010

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Welcome! Mark May 14, Sat!

Traitements associés chez l hypertendu: Statines, Aspirine

Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials EXPLAINING THE DECREASE IN DEATHS FROM CHD! PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN WOMEN EXPLAINING THE DECREASE IN

Lifetime clinical and economic benefits of statin-based LDL lowering in the 20-year Followup of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study

Optimizing risk assessment of total cardiovascular risk What are the tools? Lars Rydén Professor Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden

Novel PCSK9 Outcomes. in Perspective: Lessons from FOURIER & ODYSSEY LDL-C. ASCVD Risk. Suboptimal Statin Therapy

Decline in CV-Mortality

Statins and PCSK9 inhibitors for stroke prevention

Primary Prevention of Stroke

Tailored Statin Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes. Han, Ki Hoon Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan

Weigh the benefit of statin treatment: LDL & Beyond

Disclosures. Speaker s bureau: Research grant: Advisory Board: Servier International, Bayer, Merck Serono, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lupin

New Strategies for Lowering LDL - Are They Really Worth It?

Cardiovascular Complications of Diabetes

Should we treat everybody over 60 years with a statin? Comprehensive primary prevention in practice

Hyperlipidemia in an Otherwise Healthy 80 Year-Old Patient. Theodore D Fraker, Jr, MD Professor of Medicine

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Modulators

Statins ARE Enough For The Prevention of CVD! Professor Kausik Ray Imperial College London, UK

No relevant financial relationships

Disclosure. No relevant financial relationships. Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials

Transcription:

Dyslipidemia in women: Who should be treated and how? Lale Tokgozoglu, MD, FACC, FESC Professor of Cardiology Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Ankara, Turkey.

Cause of Death in Women: European Cardiovascular Statistics 2012

Prevalance of hypercholesterolemia above 6.2 mmol/l (240 mg/dl) by gender in Europe

Ranking and Magnitude of Risk Differs in Two Genders: 21 y FU Copenhagen City Heart Study (n=12077, women 6478) Ranking by relative risk (RR) Men RR % 1 Diabetes 1.69 4 2 Hypertension 1.46 48 3 Smoking 1.41 71 4 Physical inactivity 1.28 20 5 No daily alcohol intake 1.24 56 6 Hypercholesterolemia 1.22 47 7 Obesity 1.20 57 8 Low or middle income 1.14 78 9 Hypertrigliseridemia 1.06 40 10 School education 10 years 1.01 84 Eur Heart J 2002; 23:620 Women RR % 1 Diabetes 2.74 2 2 Smoking 2.02 58 3 Hypertension 1.42 40 4 Physical inactivity 1.36 19 5 Hypertriglyceridemia 1.33 19 6 Hypercholesterolemia 1.23 57 7 Obesity 1.19 39 8 School education 10 years 1.28 89 9 Low or middle income 1.22 82 10 No daily alcohol intake 0.99 88

Principles of risk estimation and management are same for both sexes

A low absolute risk in a younger women may conceal a high relative risk: - Extrapolate to older age - Use relative risk chart - Lifestyle advice to prevent risk

INTERHEART: The PAR for Lifestyle Factors Significantly Higher in Women Eur Heart J 2008; 29:932

Eur Heart J 2010;31:777

Canadian Dyslipidemia Guidelines

ESC/EAS Dyslipidemia Guideline: Intervention strategies as a function of total CV risk and LDL-C level Atherosclerosis 2011:217S;S1 S44

Recommendations for treatment targets for LDL-C ESC/EAS Dyslipidemia Guidelines 2011

Same medications used, Response to Therapy in Women is Different Lower body weight Higher propotion of fat Different endogenous hormone levels Differences in enzyme activities involved in drug metabolism Lower GFR

Are statins just as beneficial in women?

Comorbidities Disease severity Women are underrepresented in trials Population Clinical studies 63 69 78 Age

CTT: Effects on major vascular events per 1 0 mmol/l reduction in LDL cholesterol Lancet 2010; 376: 1670

Percent Risk Reduction Secondary Prevention: Coronary Events were reduced to same extent in both genders in 4S n=1814 n=407 n=1156 n=542 n=573 n=105-34 P<0.00001-35 P=0.01-34 P<0.0005-31 P<0.002-37 P<0.002-55 P=0.002 Men Women Older Smokers Hypertension Diabetes 4S Group. Lancet 1994;334:1383 1389.

HPS: Statin reduces vascular deaths 17 % in men, 19 % in women with DM or CVD BMC Medicine 2005, 3:6

How about statin use in ACS? Benefit of Intensive Statin Therapy in Women Results From PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Women Men Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4:328

Should statins be used for primary prevention in women?

Meta-analysis of Drug Treatment Studies in Primary Prevention in Women: No change in total and CV mortality JAMA. 2004;291:2243-2252

Why was no benefit shown for women? Underrepresentation of women in trials NNT to prevent one event high since risk is lower in women Small number of events Relatively young women included Follow up times 2.6 years Focusing on a lack of statistical significance is misleading

JUPITER: Statins in Primary Prevention reduce CV events significantly N Engl J Med 2008;359:2195

JUPITER: Effects on CV outcome in subgroups show similiar risk reduction in both genders N Engl J Med 2008;359:2195-207.

Meta-analysis of Primary Prevention Trials in Women: 1/3 reduction in CV events TOTAL CVD TOTAL MORTALITY AFS CAPSTexCAPS MEGA JUPITER P<0.001 P<0.001.1 Favors statin.5 1 Favors 5 10 placebo.1 Favors statin.5 1 Favors 5 10 placebo Circulation 2010; 121: 1069

All cause mortality and stroke not decreased for women on statin: A sex based meta-analysis ARCH INTERN MED 2012: 172 ;914

Cochrane 2013 Analysis: Mortality and morbidity with statins in primary prevention: All cause mortality and CV events reduced

Are statins effective in primary prevention in both genders? Overall the populations sampled within this review were white,male and middle aged. Therefore, caution needs to be taken regarding generalisability to women who are at lower risk of CVD events. Widespread use of statins in people at below a 1% annual all-cause mortality risk is not supported by the existing evidence Fourteen randomised control trials (16 trial arms; 34,272 participants) were included. All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.95) as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD endpoints (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.79). Benefits were also seen in the reduction of revascularisation rates (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.83).

Meta-Analysis of Statin Effects in Women Versus Men in Primary Prevention: Mortality and events reduced in all risk levels JACC 2012:59:572

Other issues to be considered in primary prevention: Diabetes risk Cost

Statins diabetes and CV risk Lancet 2010;375:735 JAMA 2011;305:2556

Statins and diabetes The risk of developing diabetes is 1 in every 255 patients treated Higher dose of statins, elderly, patients with hypertension,multiple risk factors and metabolic syndrome HbA1c over 6 %

Statin Use and Risk of Diabetes Mellitus in Postmenopausal Women in the WHI Study Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(2):144-152.

Cardiovascular benefits exceeded the diabetes risks of statin therapy in primary prevention: an analysis from the JUPITER trial DM risk limited to subjects with high BMI,HbA1C,MS or obesity Lancet 2012; 380: 565

Statins in primary prevention: Cost effectiveness analysis

Use of statins in low risk women CV benefits Diabetes risk Cost Side effects

What other parameter can help us decide? Family history CRP levels, biomarkers Imaging

Problems in real life: Lack of recognition Less agressive treatment

Gender disparities in the assessment and management of cardiovascular risk in primary care: the AUSHEART Study European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation 2011 18: 498

Effect of Gender on Cholesterol Control and Statin Use for Secondary Prevention Among Hospitalized Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Am J Cardiol 2012;110:1613 1618

LDL Control and Statin Use: EUROASPIRE III

Euroaspire IV LDL cholesterol 1.8 mmol/l All patients: 85% MOR= 1.82 Men 79%, Women 84%

How do we treat dyslipidemia in women today? Lifestyle modification is extremely important For secondary prevention, statins are recommended as same indications and targets in men Statins are recommended for high risk primary prevention LLT should not be given before,during pregnancy and at breastfeeding For low risk primary prevention each patient should be evaluated individually

ESC/EAS Dyslipidemia Guidelines 2011: Recommendations for diabetics

Accord Lipid Trial Primary Outcomes N Engl J Med 2010;362:1563

CTT Analysis shows LDL reduction beneficial even in low risk Lancet 2012

JUPITER Analysis Shows Intermediate Risk Patients Benefit From Statin Risk category Framingham 10- year risk Event rate per 100-person years, rosuvastatin 20 mg Event rate per 100-person years, placebo Hazard ratio (95% CI) <5% (n=2791) 0.22 0.34 0.64 (0.23-1.81) 5%-10% (n=6091) 0.50 0.92 0.55 (0.36-0.84) 11%-20% (n=7340) 0.95 1.84 0.51 (0.39-0.68) >20% (n=1555) 1.72) 2.41 0.70 (0.45-0.90) Circulation, 2010;Aug 24; epub.