Thrombocytopenia and Chronic Liver Disease

Similar documents
Liver Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases October 23 rd, 2017

NYU School of Medicine Department of Radiology Rotation-Specific House Staff Evaluation

Hemostasis and thrombosis in patients with liver disease. Ton Lisman, Dept Surgery, UMC Groningen, The Netherlands

VARICEAL BLEEDING. Ram Subramanian MD Hepatology & Critical Care Medical Director of Liver Transplant Emory University, Atlanta.

Denver Shunts vs TIPS for Ascites

following the last documented transfusion; thereafter, evaluate the residual impairment(s).

Steps in Assessing Fibrosis 4/30/2015. Overview of Liver Disease Associated With HCV

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

MANAGEMENT OF LIVER CIRRHOSIS: PRACTICE ESSENTIALS AND PATIENT SELF-MANAGEMENT

Tranjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt

Guidance for management of bleeding in patients taking the new oral anticoagulant drugs: rivaroxaban, dabigatran or apixaban

GI bleeding in chronic liver disease

Supplementary Digital Content

PORTAL HYPERTENSION. Tianjin Medical University LIU JIAN

ENABLE 1 Study. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of eltrombopag Primary efficacy outcome: proportion of patients who achieve SVR

A clinical survey of bleeding, thrombosis, and blood product use in decompensated cirrhosis patients

David Zaccardelli, PharmD Chief Executive Officer. J.P. Morgan 37 th Annual Healthcare Conference January 8, 2019

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Diagnosis and Management

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

2019 ReachMD Page 1 of 5

Transfusion strategies in patients with cirrhosis: less is more. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Hillingdon Hospital, London, UK

Supplemental Appendix. 1. Protocol Definition of Sustained Virologic Response. A patient has a sustained virologic response if:

Erratum to: Int J Hematol (2014) 99: DOI /s

Evidence-Base Management of Esophageal and Gastric Varices

Management of Cirrhosis Related Complications

ESLD a Guide for HIV Physicians. Marion Peters University of California San Francisco June 2015

End-Stage Liver Disease (ESLD): A Guide for HIV Physicians

Clinical Trials & Endpoints in NASH Cirrhosis

Kamran Qureshi, 1 Shyam Patel, 2 and Andrew Meillier Introduction

Thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease

Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Variceal bleeding. Mainz,

Management of Chronic Liver Failure/Cirrhosis Complications in Hospitals. By: Dr. Kevin Dolehide

Esophageal Varices Beta-Blockers or Band Ligation. Cesar Yaghi MD Hotel-Dieu de France University Hospital Universite Saint Joseph

EDUCATION PRACTICE. Management of Refractory Ascites. Clinical Scenario. The Problem

Prevalence and outcome of portal thrombosis in a cohort of cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplantation

Expert Review: Updates in Immune Thrombocytopenia. Reference Slides

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Learning Objectives. After attending this presentation, participants will be able to:

Michele Bettinelli RN CCRN Lahey Health and Medical Center

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. 1 Approach to the patient with gross gastrointestinal bleeding. Grace H. Elta, Mimi Takami

Portogram shows opacification of gastroesophageal varices.

Treating patients with end-stage liver disease: Are we ready? Dr. Mino R. Mitri, M.D., C.M., M.Ed., FRCPC

Diagnostic Procedures. Measurement of Hepatic venous pressure in management of cirrhosis. Clinician s opinion

Clinical guideline Published: 13 June 2012 nice.org.uk/guidance/cg141

DISCLOSURES. This activity is jointly provided by Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board and Cardea

Update in abdominal Surgery in cirrhotic patients

Management of Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing Non-Transplant Surgery

Management of HepatoCellular Carcinoma

Hepatobiliary Malignancies Retrospective Study at Truman Medical Center

Module 1 Introduction of hepatitis

Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics December 2008, Volume 10, Number 12:

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): Who Should be Screened and How Do We Treat? Tom Vorpahl MSN, RN, ACNP-BC

Risk factors for 5-day bleeding after endoscopic treatments for gastroesophageal varices in liver cirrhosis

DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS Tablet: 20 mg (3)

Hepatitis C: Management of Previous Non-responders with First Line Protease Inhibitors

Ontario s Adult Referral and Listing Criteria for Liver Transplantation

SOLIRIS is a Complement Inhibitor Indicated for the Treatment of Patients With PNH to Reduce Hemolysis

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A major global health problem. David L. Wood, MD Interventional Radiology Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center

The Role for Eltrombopag (Promacta) in the Treatment of HepC-Related Thrombocytopenia

Heme (Bleeding and Coagulopathies) in the ICU

Committee Approval Date: May 9, 2014 Next Review Date: May 2015

PALLIATIVE CARE IN END-STAGE LIVER DISEASE

Transjugular Intrahepatic

IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN LIVER CANCER RATES IN PATIENTS WHO RECEIVE TREATMENT FOR HEPATITIS?

Life After SVR for Cirrhotic HCV

3/31/2014 PNH. Jack Goldberg MD FACP. Clinical Professor of Medicine University of Pennsylvania

Interventional Radiology in Liver Cancer. Nakarin Inmutto MD

7/14/2014. SOLIRIS (eculizumab) SOLIRIS PNH Clinical Studies. SOLIRIS Blocks Terminal Complement. 86% Reduction in LDH: TRIUMPH and SHEPHERD

Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Markus Heim Basel

PEER-REVIEW REPORT CLASSIFICATION LANGUAGE EVALUATION SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT CONCLUSION. [ Y] Accept [ ] Grade B: Very good

The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS)

NICE Pathways bring together all NICE guidance, quality standards and other NICE information on a specific topic.

Emricasan (IDN-6556) administered orally for 28 days lowers portal pressure in patients with compensated cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension

MANAGEMENT OF OVERANTICOAGULATION AND PREOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF WARFARIN DOSE 1. GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF AN ELEVATED INR

Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension Gastroenterology Teaching Project American Gastroenterological Association

1) unexplained microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (Coombs negative anemia),

CIRRHOSIS Definition

Hepatology for the Nonhepatologist

Liver failure &portal hypertension

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Study Objective and Design

Introduction. Methods. Introduction. Methods. Methods. Journal reading Transfusion Strategies for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Promacta (eltrombopag)

Editorial Process: Submission:07/25/2018 Acceptance:10/19/2018

Ascites Management. Atif Zaman, MD MPH Oregon Health & Science University Professor of Medicine Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Hepatocellular Carcinoma HCC Updated November 2015 by: Dr. Mohammed Alghamdi (Medical Oncology Fellow, University of Calgary)

Decompensated chronic liver disease

Beyond Plasma Exchange: Targeted Therapy for Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Assessing thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit: The past, present, and future

Chronic Hepatic Disease

Transfusion Requirements and Management in Trauma RACHEL JACK

Clinical Study Synopsis

Management of Cirrhotic Complications Uncontrolled Ascites. Siwaporn Chainuvati, MD Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University

Matching study design to research question-interactive learning session

Current Liver Allocation Policies

Thromboelastography Use in the Perioperative Transfusion Management of a Patient with Hemophilia A Undergoing Liver Transplantation

Si Hyun Bae, 1,2,3 Do Seon Song, 1,2,3 Myeong Jun Song, 1,4 Woo Jin Chung, 1,5

Transcription:

Thrombocytopenia and Chronic Liver Disease Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50 x 10 9 /L) common in patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis 1 Platelet transfusions current standard of care to reduce risk of bleeding during invasive procedures in these patients associated with risk of transfusion reactions, infections and induction of platelet refractoriness No pharmacological treatments are currently licensed for this indication - an oral, small molecule TPO receptor agonist being developed to provide a measured increase in platelet count as an alternative to platelet transfusions The effects of avatrombopag are additive to endogenous TPO 1 Giannini EG. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 23(8): 1055-1065 2 Afdhal N et al. J Hepatol. 2008; 48(6): 1000-1007 3 Hod E and Schwartz J. Br J Haematol. 2008; 142(2): 348-360 4 Meehan KR et al. Am J Hematol. 2000; 64(4): 251-256 5 Rebulla P. Haematologica. 2005; 90(2): 247-253 1

Option 1 Phase 3 Studies- ADAPT-1 & ADAPT-2 Two global Phase III studies of avatrombopag in patients with thrombocytopenia and chronic liver disease undergoing scheduled procedures Identically-designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies In total, 435 patients recruited from over 20 countries (blue) 2

Phase 3 Study Design ADAPT-1 & ADAPT-2 PRE-RANDOMIZATION RANDOMIZATION (2:1 avatrombopag:placebo) FOLLOW-UP VISIT 1 VISIT 2 VISIT 3 VISIT 4 VISIT 5 VISIT 6 Screening Period Day -14 to -1 BASELINE DAY 1 TREATMENT DAY 2 5 PROCEDURE* DAY 10 13 7 DAYS POST PROCEDURE DAY 35 5 8 days after last dose of study drug 30 days after last dose of study drug Low Baseline Platelet mean Baseline PC <40 X 10 9 /L R 2:1 60 MG AVATROMBOPAG qd x 5 Days *Platelet transfusions were not mandatory High Baseline Platelet mean Baseline PC 40 to <50 X 10 9 /L R 2:1 PLACEBO 40 MG AVATROMBOPAG qd x 5 Days PLACEBO 3

Phase 3 Study Populations ADAPT-1 & ADAPT-2 MAIN INCLUSION CRITERIA Aged 18 years Chronic liver disease Mean Baseline platelet count <50 x 10 9 /L* MELD score 24 at screening Scheduled to undergo an invasive procedure MAIN EXCLUSION CRITERIA History of arterial or venous thrombosis, hematologic disorders, or cardiovascular disease Known medical history of genetic pro-thrombotic syndromes Platelet transfusion or use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents within 7 days of screening Portal vein flow <10 cm/sec at Screening Hemoglobin 8 g/dl or 18 g/dl (males) or >15 g/dl (females) Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) allowed if Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage A or B *Platelet counts were measured on 2 separate occasions: During the Screening Period and at Baseline, and performed at least 1 day apart with neither platelet count >60 x 10 9 /L 4

ADAPT-1 & ADAPT-2: Outcome Measures PRIMARY EFFICACY ENDPOINT: Proportion of patients not requiring platelet transfusion or any bleeding rescue procedure up to 7 days post-procedure Rescue procedures included: platelet transfusion, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), cryoprecipitate, vitamin K (phytonadione), desmopression, recombinant activated factor VII, aminocaproic acid, tranexamic acid, whole blood transfusion, packed red cell transfusion, surgical intervention or interventional radiology SECONDARY EFFICACY ENDPOINTS: Proportion of patients achieving the target platelet count ( 50 x 10 9 /L) Magnitude of change in platelet count from Baseline to Procedure Day SAFETY ENDPOINTS: Adverse events, serious adverse events, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) 5

APAPT-1 & ADAPT-2: Disease Characteristics ADAPT-1 ADAPT-2 (n=48) 60 mg (n=90) (n=34) 40 mg (n=59) (n=43) 60 mg (n=70) (n=33) 40 mg (n=58) Baseline Platelet Mean (± SD) 31 ± 7 31 ± 7 45 ± 3 44 ± 3 33 ± 6 33 ± 5 45 ± 3 44 ± 4 Disease Etiology, Alcoholic Liver Disease 15 14 6 19 16 17 15 10 Chronic Viral Hepatitis 63 56 79 63 61 49 55 50 Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis 8 7 0 7 12 14 15 10 Other 15 22 15 11 12 20 15 29 Hepatocellular Carcinoma, MELD Score 23 24 21 9 33 30 33 26 Mean (SD) 11.1 (3.37) 11.1 (3.33) 10.4 (2.74) 11.5 (3.75) 11.4 (3.08) 11.1 (3.25) 10.5 (3.61) 11.0 (4.07) Child-Turcotte-Pugh Grade, Grade A 63 55 61 53 49 64 49 55 Grade B 35 43 36 38 49 29 36 38 Grade C 2 2 3 9 2 7 15 7 6

ADAPT-1 & ADAPT-2: Scheduled Procedures by Bleeding Risk Bleeding Risk ADAPT-1 40 50 x 10 9 /L ADAPT-2 40 50 x 10 9 /L (n=48) 60 mg (n=90) (n=34) 40 mg (n=59) (n=43) 60 mg (n=70) (n=33) 40 mg (n=58) Low 68 67 66 59 53 60 53 58 Moderate 20 12 9 20 23 16 28 16 High 13 21 25 21 25 24 19 7 Low Bleeding Risk Procedures Thoracentesis Paracentesis Endoscopy Upper GI endoscopy +/- biopsy Upper GI endoscopy +/- variceal banding, +/- sclerotherapy Colonoscopy +/- polypectomy/biopsy Moderate Bleeding Risk Procedures Liver biopsy Bronchoscopy +/- biopsy Ethanol ablation Chemoembolization for HCC High Bleeding Risk Procedures Biliary Interventions Dental procedures Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt Laparoscopic Interventions Nephrostomy Tube placement Radiofrequency ablation Renal Biopsy Vascular catheterization 7

Patients () ADAPT-1 & ADAPT-2: Primary Endpoint Proportion of Patients Who did NOT Require Platelet Transfusion or Any Rescue Procedure for Bleeding* 100 90 80 p<0.0001 p<0.006 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 88 89 70 60 66 69 50 40 30 [VALUE] 38 [VALUE] 20 23 10 *Full Analysis Set 0 ADAPT-1 ADAPT-2 ADAPT-1 ADAPT-2 8

Patients () Change in Platelet Count x 10 9 /L Option 2 ADAPT-1 & ADAPT-2: Secondary Endpoints Proportion of Patients Who Achieved Platelet Counts 50 x 10 9 /L on Procedure Day* 100 90 80 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 88 p<0.0001 93 50 45 40 Magnitude of Change in Platelet Count from Baseline to Procedure Day* D 31 x 10 9 /L D 27 x 10 9 /L D 36 x 10 9 /L D 40 x 10 9 /L 45 70 60 69 67 35 30 32 30 37 50 25 40 39 20 30 15 20 21 10 10 0 [VALUE] 4 ADAPT-1 ADAPT-2 ADAPT-1 ADAPT-2 *Full Analysis Set 5 0 5 3 1 1 ADAPT-1 ADAPT-2 ADAPT-1 ADAPT-2 9

ADAPT-1 & ADAPT-2: Change in Platelet Count Over Time Platelet counts reproducibly increased from Day 4, peaked at Day 10-13, and returned to Baseline levels by Day 35 Only 3 (1.1) patients had a platelet counts >200 x10 9 /L at any time during the study; all were asymptomatic 90 ADAPT-1 100 ADAPT-2 80 70 60 : 60 mg : 40 mg 90 80 70 60 : 60 mg : 40 mg 50 50 40 40 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days DOSING Visit 2 Day 1 Baseline Visit 3 Day 4 Visit 4 Day 10 Procedure Day Visit 15 Day 17 Visit 6 Day 35 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days DOSING Visit 2 Day 1 Baseline Visit 3 Day 4 Visit 4 Day 10 Procedure Day Visit 15 Day 17 Visit 6 Day 35 10

ADAPT-1 & ADAPT-2: Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (n=48) 60 mg (n=89) ADAPT-1 (n=32) 40 mg (n=58) (n=43) 60 mg (n=70) ADAPT-2 (n=33) 40 mg (n=57) TEAEs 65 60 56 53 51 51 46 49 Treatment-related TEAEs 15 14 6 7 21 9 6 7 TEAE with CTCAE Grade 3 or Above 17 8 0 17 9 9 12 12 Serious TEAEs 23 11 3 14 2 1 3 2 Deaths 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 Other SAEs 23 11 3 10 2 1 0 2 Life threatening 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hospitalization 19 11 3 10 2 1 0 2 Important Medical Events TEAEs leading to study drug dose adjustment TEAEs leading to study drug withdrawal 6 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Full Analysis Set (FAS) all randomized subjects; Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) an adverse event that started on or after the date of first dose of study drug, up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug. For each row category, a subject with two or more adverse events in that category is counted only once. 11

ADAPT-1 & ADAPT-2: Deaths & Adverse Events of Special Interest Deaths: N=2 in ADAPT-1 Both in the 40 mg avatrombopag group; not considered to be study drug-related N=1 in ADAPT-2 In the placebo group; not considered to be study drug-related AEs Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation: N=2 in ADAPT-1 Both occurred in the 60 mg avatrombopag group Only one subject discontinued due to study drug-related TEAEs of myalgia and anemia Medically Significant Events: N=1 in ADAPT-2 TEAE of portal vein thrombosis in a 71 yo male in the 40 mg avatrombopag group Platelet count 45 x10 9 /L at Baseline that increased to 77 x 10 9 /L on Procedure Day, and then decreased to 61 x 10 9 /L at Visit 5 and 45 x10 9 /L at Visit 6 Scheduled procedure: upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with variceal banding Partial portal vein thrombosis identified 14 days after the last dose of avatrombopag Event was judged as non-serious and potentially drug-related, although causality assessment confounded by concomitant medication (ie, bisoprolol- associated with mesenteric thrombosis) 12

Summary and Conclusions was superior to placebo in: Reducing the need for platelet transfusion or any rescue procedure for bleeding following a scheduled procedure Increasing the proportion of patients achieving the target platelet count ( 50 x 10 9 /L) The magnitude of change in platelet count from Baseline to Procedure Day Pharmacodynamics were predictable & durable Platelet counts reproducibly increased after 4 days, peaked after 10-13 days, and returned to Baseline by Day 35 The safety profile of avatrombopag was similar to placebo No hepatotoxicity or increase in thromboembolic or bleeding events, no rebound thrombocytopenia offers an effective and safe alternative to platelet transfusion for patients with thrombocytopenia and chronic liver disease undergoing scheduled procedures 13