Figure 1. Study flow diagram. Reasons for withdrawal during the extension phase are included in the flow diagram. 508 patients enrolled and randomized

Similar documents
London, 1 June 2006 Product name: REMICADE Procedure number: Remicade-H-240-II-73-AR SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION 1/8

New Evidence reports on presentations given at EULAR Safety and Efficacy of Tocilizumab as Monotherapy and in Combination with Methotrexate

Biologic therapy for Rheumatoid arthritis. Paul Etau Ekwom Physician and Rheumatologist

The BeSt way of withdrawing biologic agents

Rheumatoid arthritis in adults: diagnosis and management

BRIEFING DOCUMENT. human, recombinant fusion protein: extracellular domain of CTLA-4 and Fc domain of human IgG1

2. Does the patient have a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or Crohn s? Y N

Practical RA Treatment: James R. O Dell, M.D. University of Nebraska Medical Center May 24, 2014

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab DE019 OLE (5-year) Clinical Study Report Amendment 1 R&D/06/095. (For National Authority Use Only)

Annual Rheumatology & Therapeutics Review for Organizations & Societies

J. van Aken* H. van Dongen* S. le Cessie F.C. Breedveld T.W.J. Huizinga. * both authors contributed equally

New Evidence reports on presentations given at ACR Improving Radiographic, Clinical, and Patient-Reported Outcomes with Rituximab

NICE DECISION SUPPORT UNIT

Meta-analysis of long-term joint structural deterioration in minimally treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis

(For National Authority Use Only) Page:

Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis and ANCA-associated Vasculitis

New Evidence reports on presentations given at EULAR Rituximab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Vasculitis

Pharmacy Prior Authorization

1.0 Abstract. Title. Keywords. Adalimumab, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Effectiveness, Safety. Rationale and Background

Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Past, the Present and the Future

New Evidence reports on presentations given at EULAR Tocilizumab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

3. Has the patient shown improvement in signs and symptoms of the disease? Y N

Subject: Remicade (Page 1 of 5)

Request for Special Authorization Enbrel

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab (HUMIRA ) W Clinical Study Report R&D/15/0629. Individual Study Table Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume:

Treat - to - Target Pathway Commissioning Chronic and Complex Care MIDLANDS RHEUMATOLOGY & MUSCULOSKELETAL (MSK) COMMISSIONING NETWORK

James R. O Dell, M.D. University of Nebraska Medical Center

New Evidence reports on presentations given at EULAR Tocilizumab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

1.0 Abstract. Title. Keywords. Rationale and Background

Inflectra Frequently Asked Questions

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 26 April 2006

NEW ZEALAND DATA SHEET

Ontario Public Drug Programs. Inflectra (infliximab) Frequently Asked Questions

Chen et al. Arthritis Research & Therapy (2018) 20:81

CCFA. Crohns Disease vs UC: What is the best treatment for me? November

They are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:

Circle Yes or No Y N. [If no, skip to question 7.] 2. Does the patient have a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis? Y N. [If no, skip to question 4.

Drug selection in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Horizon Scanning Centre November Secukinumab for active and progressive psoriatic arthritis. SUMMARY NIHR HSC ID: 5330

Perioperative Medicine:

Stelara. Stelara (ustekinumab) Description

C. Assess clinical response after the first three months of treatment.

Pharmacy Prior Authorization

Appendix 1: Frequently Asked Questions

Effective Health Care Program

Supplemental Table 1. Key Inclusion Criteria Inclusion Criterion OPTIMA PREMIER 18 years old with RA (per 1987 revised American College of General

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2016 Montreal, QC

SYNOPSIS. Clinical Study Report IM Double-blind Period

Ποώιμη έμαονη ηηπ βιξλξγικήπ θεοαπείαπ ζηη οερμαηξειδή αοθοίηιδα. ΑΝΣΙΛΟΓΟ

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 3 October 2012

SIMPONI Solution for Injection in a pre-filled syringe Solution for Injection in a pre-filled pen, SmartJect

Abatacept (Orencia) for active rheumatoid arthritis. August 2009

Coverage Criteria: Express Scripts, Inc. monograph dated 12/15/ months or as otherwise noted by indication

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Assessment group response to Wyeth commentary on assessment report

Biotechnologically produced drugs as second-line therapy for rheumatoid arthritis 1

Synopsis (C0524T12 GO LIVE)

Patient #1. Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatoid Arthritis. 45 y/o female Morning stiffness in her joints >1 hour

Rheumatoid Arthritis. By: Hadi Esmaily (PharmD., BCCP, MBA) Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti Medical University

1 Executive summary. Background

LOCALLY AVAILABLE BIOLOGIC AGENTS IN THE TREATMENT OF PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

PDF of Trial CTRI Website URL -

2. Does the patient have a diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA)? Y N

Challenges in Perioperative Medication Management. Learning Objectives. Case 1. » Appropriate use of beta-blockers. Management of diabetes drugs

SIMPONI Solution for Injection in a pre-filled syringe Solution for Injection in a pre-filled pen, SmartJect PRODUCT INFORMATION

3. Is the prescribed dose within the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- approved dosing for giant cell arteritis?

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab DE018 OLE (5 year) Clinical Study Report R&D/06/369. (For National Authority Use Only) to Part of Dossier: Volume:

Serious bacterial infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis under anti-tnf-a therapy

1 P a g e. Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (SJIA) (1.3) Patients 2 years of age and older with active systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

2. Is the patient responding to Remicade therapy? Y N

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE. SINGLE TECHNOLOGY APPRAISAL Certolizumab Pegol for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Treatment Goals. Current Therapeutic Pyramids Crohn s Disease Ulcerative Colitis 11/14/10

Azathioprine for Induction and Maintenance of Remission in Crohn s Disease

Coccidioidomycosis in Rheumatologic Patients. Susan E. Hoover, MD

3. Does the patient have a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with moderate to high disease activity?

Recommendations for RA management: what has changed?

K. Laas 1, R. Peltomaa 1, K. Puolakka 2, H. Kautiainen 3, M. Leirisalo-Repo 1

Inflammatory arthritis Shared Decision Making

Regulatory Status FDA- approved indication: Simponi and Simponi ARIA are tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers indicated for the treatment of: (2-3)

Structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis as visualized through radiographs Désirée van der Heijde

PsA. SIMPONI (golimumab) Rheumatoid arthritis. Psoriatic arthritis. Ankylosing spondylitis EFFICACY EFFICACY EFFICACY. QoL. QoL.

Relative effect (95% CI) RR LOW 2,3 due to indirectness, imprecision. RR 1.45 (0.43 to 4.84) due to indirectness, imprecision. (0.18 to 20.

Rheumatoid Arthritis. Improving Outcomes in RA: Three Pillars. RA: Chronic Joint Destruction and Disability What We Try to Prevent

Drug combinations with methotrexate to treat rheumatoid arthritis

Principal Investigator. General Information. Conflict of Interest. Certification Published on The YODA Project (

3. Did the patient show evidence of remission by week 8 of Humira Y N therapy?

How to use infliximab?

Changes in Benefit Status and Criteria Update: Topiramate

Drugs and Applicable Coding: J-code: Enbrel-J1438; Humira-J0135; Remicade-J1745; Inflectra-Q5102; Cimzia-J0718; Simponi-J1602 Renflexis - pending

REMICADE POWDER FOR INJECTION

Proposed Retirement for HEDIS : Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis (ART)

Bringing the clinical experience with anakinra to the patient

To help you with terms and abbreviations used in this document that may be unfamiliar to you, a glossary is provided on the last pages.

Fml Limits. Azathioprine (Imuran) 50mg, 75mg, 100mg - $26.85 Cyclosporine, 25mg, 100mg. $ Leflunomide (Arava) 10mg Tablet - $144.

Solidifying the Data. In Supportive Care Oncology. Coverage from the ACR 2014 Meeting

Scottish Medicines Consortium

2. Has the patient had a response to treatment? Y N. 3. Does the patient have a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)? Y N

Further cost-effectiveness analysis of sequential TNF inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis patients

Transcription:

508 patients enrolled and randomized 126 assigned to sequential monotherapy (group 1) 121 assigned to step-up combination therapy (group 2) 133 assigned to initial combination therapy with prednisone (group 3) 128 assigned to initial combination therapy with infliximab (group 4) 6 withdrawals 9 withdrawals 8 withdrawals 4 withdrawals 120 patients completed 2-year follow-up 112 completed 2-year follow-up 125 completed 2-year follow-up 124 completed 2-year follow-up 5 withdrawals: pat refusal (n=3) deceased (n=1) SAE (n=1) 11 withdrawals: pat refusal (n=9) deceased (n=2) 6 withdrawals: pat moved from area (n=4) par refusal (n=1) other (n=1) 5 withdrawals pat refusal (n=2) deceased (n=1) SAE (n=1) other (n=1) 115 patients completed 4-year follow-up 101 patients completed 4-year follow-up 119 patients completed 4-year follow-up 119 patients completed 4-year follow-up Figure 1. Study flow diagram. Reasons for withdrawal during the extension phase are included in the flow diagram.

Table 1. Primary outcomes during 4 years follow-up. Sequential monotherapy (Group1) Step-up combination therapy (Group 2) Initial combination with prednisone (Group 3) Initial combination with infliximab (Group 4) P value Mean (SD) improvement in health assessment questionnaire compared with baseline 3 years 0.8 (0.7) 0.7 (0.7) 0.8 (0.8) 0.9 (0.7) 0.66 4 years 0.8 (0.6) 0.7 (0.8) 0.8 (0.8) 0.8 (0.8) 0.64 Progression of Sharp-van der Heijde Score from baseline to 4 years follow-up Total score Mean (SD) 11.7 (17.3) 9.7 (12.8) 6.7 (9.6) 5.4 (9.2) Median (IQR) 5.0 (1.0-15.8) 5.5 (1.0-13.8) 3.0 (1.0-7.5) 2.5 (0.5-6.5) 0.005 Erosion score Mean (SD) 6.0 (8.8) 5.7 (6.8) 3.0 (4.1) 3.0 (5.2) Median (IQR) 3.0 (0.5-8.5) 3.5 (0.5-10.0) 2.0 (0.5-3.5) 1.5 (0.5-4.0) 0.001 Narrowing score Mean (SD) 5.7 (10.0) 4.0 (7.0) 3.7 (6.7) 2.4 (4.6) Median (IQR) 1.8 (0.0-7.0) 1.0 (0.0-4.5) 1.0 (0.0-3.9) 1.0 (0.0-2.5) 0.17 SD, Standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; group 1 versus group 2, P=0.77; group 1 versus group 3, P=0.06; group 1 versus group 4, P=0.002; group 2 versus group 3, P=0.10; group 2 versus group 4, P=0.005; group 3 versus group 4, P=0.18. P <0.05 for all comparisons of groups 1 and 2 versus groups 3 and 4.

Change from baseline (sharp units) 100 80 60 40 20 0 sequential monotherapy step-up combination therapy initial combination with prednisone initial combination with infliximab Figure 2. Cumulative probability distribution of total Sharp-van der Heijde Score over 4 years of treatment with sequential monotherapy, step-up combination therapy, initial combination therapy including prednisone or initial combination therapy including infliximab. The smallest detectable change (SDC) was 4.6 Sharp units and is represented by the horizontal line. 0 20 40 60 80 100 Cumulative probability

Table 2. Baseline differences between patients who did or did not achieve drug-free remission after 4 years. Drug-free remission N=67 No drug-free remission N=441 p-value Age, years 56 (15) 54 (14) 0.45 Males, no. (%) 35 (52) 130 (29) <0.001* Time from diagnosis to inclusion, weeks 2 (1-4) 2 (1-5) 0.63 (median, IQR) Symptom duration, weeks (median, IQR) 18 (11-33) 24 (14-56) 0.007* IgM rheumatoid factor negative, no. (%) 32 (48) 147 (33) 0.02 Anti-CCP negative, no. (%) 38 (57) 144 (36) 0.001* DAS 4.1 (0.8) 4.5 (0.9) 0.004 HAQ, 0-3 scale 1.2 (0.6) 1.4 (0.7) 0.002 VAS pain (mm) 45 (22) 55 (22) 0.001 VAS disease activity (mm) 55 (19) 61 (23) 0.04 VAS morning stiffness (mm) 54 (24) 60 (24) 0.04 Erosive, no (%) 44 (69) 313 (72) 0.60 Total SHS, 0-448 scale (median, IQR) 3.3 (1.0-6.9) 4.0 (1.5-9.0) 0.18 * Independently associated with drug-free remission after 4 years. Values are the mean (SD) unless indicated otherwise. IQR, interquartile range; DAS, disease activity score (44 joints); HAQ, health assessment questionnaire; VAS, visual analog scale; SHS, modified Sharp/van der Heijde Score.

Sequential monotherapy Step-up combination therapy 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% dropout other MTX+IFX SSA or LEF MTX no DMARD 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% dropout other MTX+IFX step-up combi MTX no DMARD 0% baseline t=1 yr t=2 yrs t=3 yrs t=4 yrs 0% baseline t=1 yr t=2 yrs t=3 yrs t=4 yrs Initial combination with prednisone Initial combination with infliximab 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% dropout other MTX+IFX SSA or LEF MTX,CSA,pred MTX,SSA,pred SSA 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% dropout other MTX+IFX MTX no DMARD 0% baseline t=1 yr t=2 yrs t=3 yrs t=4 yrs no DMARD 0% baseline t=1 yr t=2 yrs t=3 yrs t=4 yrs Figure 3. Percentage of patients on different treatment steps, including the occurrence of drug-free remission (no DMARD) in 4 different treatment strategies during 4 years of follow-up. No DMARD, drug-free remission; MTX, methotrexate; SSA, sulfasalazine; LEF, leflunomide; IFX, infliximab; CSA, cyclosporine A; pred, prednisone; AZA, azathioprine; step-up combi, patients treated with MTX + SSA( + hydroxychloroquine, + prednisone); other, in groups 1-3: patients in treatment steps beyond MTX + IFX, and in group 4: patients treated with SSA, LEF, CSA, gold or AZA, combined with patients who were treated outside the treatment protocol in all groups.

Table 3. Adverse events and serious adverse events during 4 years follow-up. Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 P-value AE Any AE during 4 years 103 (82) 100 (83) 106 (80) 107 (84) 0.87 Any AE in year 3-4 76 (60) 74 (61) 76 (57) 82 (64) 0.72 Infectious year 3-4 31 (25) 35 (29) 24 (18) 32 (25) 0.23 Gastro intestinal year 3-4 18 (14) 13 (11) 17 (13) 21 (16) 0.61 Dermal / mucosal year 3-4 16 (13) 16 (13) 18 (14) 12 (9) 0.72 Neurological year 3-4 9 (7) 11 (9) 3 (2) 16 (13) 0.02 Cardiovascular year 3-4 5 (4) 7 (6) 13 (10) 11 (9) 0.25 Infusion reactions year 3-4 (no.) 1 0 1 2 0.58 SAE Any SAE during 4 years 41 (33) 29 (24) 33 (25) 26 (20) 0.15 Any SAE in year 3-4 26 (21) 21 (17) 15 (11) 19 (15) 0.21 Total SAEs during 4 years (no.) 57 45 60 47 0.31 Serious infections during 4 years (no.) 12 2 5 6 0.03 Malignancies during 4 years (except 3 4 5 1 0.44 non-melanoma skin cancers; no.) Non-melanoma skin cancers during 2 0 1 3 0.35 4 years (no.) Deaths during 4 years (no.) 1 3 1 3 0.53 Values indicate the number (percentage) of patients unless indicated otherwise. AE, adverse event; SAE, serious adverse event. P<0.05 for group 3 versus group 4; P<0.05 for group 1 versus group 2. Causes of death per group were the following, in group 1: pneumonia, antibiotic treatment refused (year 3); group 2: cerebrovascular accident (year 2); bronchial carcinoma and myocardial infarction (both year 4); group 3: ovarian carcinoma (year 2); group 4: disseminated tuberculosis* [24] and myocardial infarction (both year 2); septic arthritis* (year 3). *deaths judged to be possibly related to treatment with infliximab.