REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease

Similar documents
EMBARGO: 08:30 Central European Summer Time Tuesday 29th August 2017

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

The HPS3/TIMI55 REVEAL Collaborative Group* abstract

ASCEND A randomized trial of omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil) versus placebo for primary cardiovascular prevention in 15,480 patients with diabetes

EDMS #4298 Version 1.0

Protecting the heart and kidney: implications from the SHARP trial

ASCEND Randomized placebo-controlled trial of aspirin 100 mg daily in 15,480 patients with diabetes and no baseline cardiovascular disease

Safety of Anacetrapib in Patients with or

ESC Geoffrey Rose Lecture on Population Sciences Cholesterol and risk: past, present and future

Marshall Tulloch-Reid, MD, MPhil, DSc, FACE Epidemiology Research Unit Tropical Medicine Research Institute The University of the West Indies, Mona,

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors - what have we learnt? Philip Barter The Heart Research Institute Sydney, Australia

Effects of Lowering LDL Cholesterol on Progression of Kidney Disease

Protocol. This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

CETP inhibition: pros and cons. Philip Barter The Heart Research Institute Sydney, Australia

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

Is Lower Better for LDL or is there a Sweet Spot

The ACCELERATE Trial

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

Characterization of Types and Sizes of Myocardial Infarction Reduced with Evolocumab in FOURIER

Randomized comparison of single versus double mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 5 year outcomes of the Arterial Revascularization Trial

Effective Treatment Options With Add-on or Combination Therapy. Christie Ballantyne (USA)

Effects of the Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitor Dalcetrapib in Patients with Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome

Cardiovascular outcomes trials with non-statin lipid-lowering drugs in diabetes

Lipid Management 2013 Statin Benefit Groups

Title: Statins for haemodialysis patients with diabetes? Long-term follow-up endorses the original conclusions of the 4D study.

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

The inhibition of CETP: From simply raising HDL-c to promoting cholesterol efflux and lowering of atherogenic lipoproteins Prof Dr J Wouter Jukema

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

AIM HIGH for SATURN and stay SHARP; COURAGE (v1.5)

Data Analysis Plan for assessing clinical efficacy and safety of ER niacin/laropiprant in the HPS2-THRIVE trial

Dyslipidemia in the light of Current Guidelines - Do we change our Practice?

La prevenzione secondaria dopo sindrome coronarica acuta. Aldo Pietro Maggioni Centro Studi ANMCO Firenze

A loss-of-function variant in CETP and risk of CVD in Chinese adults

LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular outcomes?

Supplementary appendix

Presented by Terje R. Pedersen Oslo Disclosure: Research grants and/or speaker- / consulting fees from Merck, MSP, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer

Supplement materials:

A: Epidemiology update. Evidence that LDL-C and CRP identify different high-risk groups

Best Medical Therapy for asymptomatic carotid disease

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE General practice Indicators for the NICE menu

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Statins ARE Enough For The Prevention of CVD! Professor Kausik Ray Imperial College London, UK

The Target is LDL, HDL not so much

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

Disclosures No relationships (not even to an employer) No off-label uses. Cholesterol Lowering Guidelines: What now?

Online Appendices Online Appendix 1 Online Appendix 2 Online Appendix 3a Online Appendix 3b Online Appendix 3c Online Appendix 4 Online Appendix 5

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

Supplementary Appendix

Felix Vallotton Ball (1899) LDL-C management in Asian diabetes: moderate vs. high intensity statin --- a lesson from EMPATHY study

What have We Learned in Dyslipidemia Management Since the Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline?

Andrew Cohen, MD and Neil S. Skolnik, MD INTRODUCTION

2003 World Health Organization (WHO) / International Society of Hypertension (ISH) Statement on Management of Hypertension.

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Weigh the benefit of statin treatment: LDL & Beyond

Kanyini Guidelines Adherence with the Polypill (Kanyini GAP)

2013 Cholesterol Guidelines. Anna Broz MSN, RN, CNP, AACC Adult Certified Nurse Practitioner North Ohio Heart, Inc.

T. Suithichaiyakul Cardiomed Chula

ATP IV: Predicting Guideline Updates

CONTRIBUTING FACTORS FOR STROKE:

Lipid Therapy: Statins and Beyond. Ivan Anderson, MD RIHVH Cardiology

Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 54, No. 25, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /09/$36.

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

A Naturally Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Genetic Variants that Mimic CETP Inhibitors and Statins on the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.

Joslin Diabetes Center Advances in Diabetes and Thyroid Disease 2013 Consensus and Controversy in Diabetic Dyslipidemia

Macrovascular Residual Risk. What risk remains after LDL-C management and intensive therapy?

journal of medicine The new england Rosuvastatin to Prevent Vascular Events in Men and Women with Elevated C-Reactive Protein Abstract

GALECTIN-3 PREDICTS LONG TERM CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN HIGH-RISK CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS

However, if instead, CHD risk is plotted on a doubling scale (as in slide 2) then there is a

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: a prospective cohort study

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Achieving Very Low LDL-C Levels With the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in the FOURIER Outcomes Trial

Landmark Clinical Trials.

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

A factorial randomized trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

Supplementary Online Content

Canagliflozin for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the CANVAS Program

Attainment of Combined Optimal Lipid Values With the Use of Niacin

The Indian Polycap Study 1 & 2 (TIPS 1 & 2) and The International Polycap Study 3 & 4 (TIPS 3 & 4)

Zürcher Herzkurs, New drugs and interactions. LDL - what else?

Farmaci innovativi in ambito cardiovascolare: considerazioni di Farmacologia. Prof. Alberto Corsini University of Milan, Italy

Lifetime clinical and economic benefits of statin-based LDL lowering in the 20-year Followup of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study

An introduction to Quality by Design. Dr Martin Landray University of Oxford

ADVANCE post trial ObservatioNal Study

Management of LDL as a Risk Factor. Raul D. Santos MD, PhD Heart Institute-InCor University of Sao Paulo Brazil

Articles. Vol 377 June 25,

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

2013 Cholesterol Guidelines. Anna Broz MSN, RN, CNP, AACC Cer=fied Adult Nurse Prac==oner North Ohio Heart, Inc.

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Diabetes mellitus type 2 and angina pectoris : novel insights in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment Wiersma, J.J.

How would you manage Ms. Gold

2013 ACC AHA LIPID GUIDELINE JAY S. FONTE, MD

CLINICAL OUTCOME Vs SURROGATE MARKER

Approach to Dyslipidemia among diabetic patients

TICAGRELOR VERSUS CLOPIDOGREL AFTER THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ST- ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Update on Lipid Management in Cardiovascular Disease: How to Understand and Implement the New ACC/AHA Guidelines

Controversies in Lipid Therapy: Is there any value in adjusting HDL levels?

Transcription:

REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Martin Landray and Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS 3 / TIMI 55 - REVEAL Collaborative Group Funded by MSD, British Heart Foundation, Medical Research Council Designed, conducted and analysed independently of the funders University of Oxford is the trial sponsor

HPS 3 / TIMI 55 - REVEAL Collaborative Group Steering Committee Principal Investigators: Martin Landray, Louise Bowman Regional representatives: Chair & Deputy Chair: Rory Collins, Eugene Braunwald Trial Statistician: Jemma Hopewell Other members: United Kingdom: Jane Armitage, Richard Haynes Colin Baigent Philip Barter N America: Christopher Cannon, Stephen Wiviott Yiping Chen Zhengming Chen Scandinavia: Terje Pedersen Shinya Goto Alastair Gray China: Lixin Jiang Boby Mihaylova Peter Sleight Italy: Aldo Maggioni Tamio Teramoto Jonathan Tobert Germany: Georg Ertl, Christiane Angermann, Christoph Wanner Non-voting MSD representatives: Robert Blaustein, Paul DeLucca, Gerard van Leijenhorst, Yale Mitchel Data Monitoring Committee Peter Sandercock (Chair), David DeMets, Andrew Tonkin, John Kjekshus, James Neuberger, Jonathan Emberson (non-voting) With many thanks to the more than 30,000 patients and hundreds of clinicians & researchers who made this trial possible.

Background Anacetrapib is a potent inhibitor of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) which doubles HDL-cholesterol and lowers LDL-cholesterol Previous trials of other CETP inhibitors have been stopped after around 2 years of follow-up due to unexpected cardiovascular hazards (torcetrapib) or apparent lack of efficacy (dalcetrapib, evacetrapib) The REVEAL trial assessed the efficacy and safety of adding anacetrapib vs. placebo to effective doses of atorvastatin among patients with established occlusive vascular disease

REVEAL trial design Eligibility: 30,000 patients aged over 50 years with occlusive vascular disease Background statin: Atorvastatin 20 or 80 mg daily (China: 10 or 20 mg) Randomized: Anacetrapib 100 mg daily vs. matching placebo Follow-up: 4 years and 1900 primary outcomes Primary outcome: Major Coronary Event (i.e. Coronary death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization) REVEAL Collaborative Group. Am Heart J 2017;187:182-90

Baseline demographics Characteristic Total (30449) Age (years) Mean 67 Gender Male 25534 (84%) Female 4915 (16%) Region Europe 15738 (52%) North America 6082 (20%) China 8629 (28%)

Prior disease & blood lipids at randomization (after 8-12 weeks treatment with atorvastatin) Characteristic Total (30449) Prior disease Coronary heart disease 26679 (88%) Cerebrovascular disease 6781 (22%) Peripheral arterial disease 2435 (8%) Diabetes mellitus 11320 (37%) Lipids HDL cholesterol 40 mg/dl (1.0 mmol/l) LDL cholesterol 61 mg/dl (1.6 mmol/l) Non-HDL cholesterol 92 mg/dl (2.4 mmol/l)

Follow-up and adherence to treatment Follow-up Median duration 4.1 years Complete 99.8% Anacetrapib Placebo Adherence at midpoint Randomized treatment* 89.9% 89.7% Study atorvastatin 90.3% 89.7% Any statin 94.6% 94.7% * No difference in any reason for stopping allocated treatment

Effects of anacetrapib on lipids at trial midpoint Measurement Absolute difference Proportional mg/dl SI units difference HDL cholesterol +43 +1.1 mmol/l 104% Apolipoprotein AI +42 +0.4 g/l 36% LDL cholesterol - Direct (Genzyme) -26-0.7 mmol/l -41% - Beta-quantification* -11-0.3 mmol/l -17% Apolipoprotein B -12-0.1 g/l -18% Non-HDL cholesterol -17-0.4 mmol/l -18% * measured in a random subset of 2000 participants

Primary outcome: Major coronary events (Coronary death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization) Participants with Event (%) 15 10 5 Anacetrapib Placebo 1640 (10.8%) 1803 (11.8%) Rate ratio 0.91 (0.85 to 0.97) P=0.004 Placebo Anacetrapib 0 0 1 2 3 4 Years of Follow-up

Components of the primary outcome Type of Event Coronary death Myocardial infarction Coronary death or MI Coronary revascularization Major coronary event Anacetrapib Placebo (N=15225) (N=15224) no. of participants with events (%) 388 669 934 1081 1640 (2.5) (4.4) (6.1) (7.1) (10.8) 420 769 1048 1201 1803 (2.8) (5.1) (6.9) (7.9) (11.8) Rate Ratio (95% CI) 0.92 (0.80 1.06) 0.87 (0.78 0.96) 0.89 (0.81 0.97) 0.90 (0.83 0.97) 0.91 (0.85 0.97) P Value 0.25 0.007 0.008 0.01 0.004 Major coronary event: Coronary death, MI or coronary revascularization 0.8 1.0 1.2 Anacetrapib Better Placebo Better No significant evidence of differential proportional effects among 23 pre-specified subgroup categories

Proportional reduction in Coronary death or MI vs. absolute reduction in non-hdl cholesterol (derived from published CTT meta-analysis) Proportional risk reduction 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% REVEAL More vs. less 22 mg/dl red n (5 trials) Statin vs. control <50 mg/dl red n (17 trials) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Absolute reduction in non-hdl cholesterol (mg/dl) Statin vs. control >50 mg/dl red n (4 trials)

Primary & secondary outcomes Type of Event Coronary death Myocardial infarction Coronary death or MI Coronary revascularization Major coronary event Anacetrapib Placebo (N=15225) (N=15224) no. of participants with events (%) 388 669 934 1081 1640 (2.5) (4.4) (6.1) (7.1) (10.8) 420 769 1048 1201 1803 (2.8) (5.1) (6.9) (7.9) (11.8) Major coronary event: Coronary death, MI or coronary revascularization Major atherosclerotic event: Coronary death, MI or presumed ischaemic stroke 0.8 1.0 1.2 Anacetrapib Better Placebo Better Major vascular event: Coronary death, MI, coronary revascularization or presumed ischaemic stroke Rate Ratio (95% CI) 0.92 (0.80 1.06) 0.87 (0.78 0.96) 0.89 (0.81 0.97) 0.90 (0.83 0.97) 0.91 (0.85 0.97) Presumed ischaemic stroke 485 (3.2) 489 (3.2) 0.99 (0.87 1.12) Major atherosclerotic event 1383 (9.1) 1483 (9.7) 0.93 (0.86 1.00) 0.05 Major vascular event 2068 (13.6) 2214 (14.5) 0.93 (0.88 0.99) 0.02 P Value 0.25 0.007 0.008 0.01 0.004

Other clinical assessments Assessment Anacetrapib Placebo Difference P New-onset diabetes mellitus 510 (5.3%) 571 (6.0%) -0.6% 0.0496 Blood pressure Systolic (mmhg) 132.4 131.7 +0.7 0.002 Diastolic (mmhg) 77.6 77.4 +0.3 0.04 Hypertensive serious adverse events 151 (1.0%) 141 (0.9%) +0.1% 0.56 Kidney disease New-onset egfr <60 ml/min/1.73m 2 1344 (11.5%) 1236 (10.6%) +0.84% 0.04 Renal failure serious adverse events 169 (1.1%) 146 (1.0%) +0.15% 0.20 No effect on vascular, non-vascular, or all-cause mortality No effect on cancer, liver, muscle, cognitive function, or other adverse events

Effects of adding anacetrapib to intensive statin therapy Significant 9% proportional reduction in major coronary events (effect appears to be greater in later years of treatment) Small reduction in risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus No excess of symptomatic side-effects with anacetrapib (levels in adipose rise with continued treatment) No excess of mortality, cancer or other serious adverse events (small increase in BP and small reduction in kidney function) Post-trial follow-up of all consenting participants (off-drug) to assess longer-term efficacy and safety of anacetrapib

Available at www.nejm.org together with supplementary methods, analyses, and detailed tabulations of adverse events