Physique Science. Suite 2a, 76 Commercial Road Newstead, QLD 4006

Similar documents
Client Sex Facility Birth Date Height Weight Measured ####, #### #### (not specified) #### #### #### ####

Fat Mass. Baseline. (lbs) (lbs) Composition Trend: Total. Aug 17. Apr 17. May 17. Jun 17. Jul 17. Measured Date

The Bone Wellness Centre - Specialists in Dexa Total Body 855 Broadview Avenue Suite # 305 Toronto, Ontario M4K 3Z1

DEXA Bone Mineral Density Tests and Body Composition Analysis Information for Health Professionals

The Bone Wellness Centre - Specialists in Dexa Scanning 855 Broadview Avenue Suite # 305 Toronto, Ontario M4K 3Z1

2013 ISCD Official Positions Adult

DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY (DXA) GOLD STANDARD FOR BONE HEALTH AND BODY COMPOSITION ASSESSMENT

Obesity Increases Precision Errors in Total Body Dual X-ray Absorptiometry Measurements.

DXA Body Composition Scan + Visceral Fat Analysis

The Bone Wellness Centre - Specialists in DEXA Scanning 855 Broadview Avenue Suite # 305 Toronto, Ontario M4K 3Z1

Body Composition Monitors - Model HBF-361

The Bone Wellness Centre - Specialists in DEXA Scanning 855 Broadview Avenue Suite # 305 Toronto, Ontario M4K 3Z1

The Bone Wellness Centre - Specialists in DEXA Scanning 855 Broadview Avenue Suite # 305 Toronto, Ontario M4K 3Z1

The Bone Wellness Centre - Specialists in DEXA Scanning 855 Broadview Avenue Suite # 305 Toronto, Ontario M4K 3Z1

Understanding Body Composition

TigerPrints. Clemson University. Nadia Marie Ghassan Najm Clemson University

In-vivo precision of the GE Lunar idxa for the measurement of visceral adipose tissue in

2013 ISCD Combined Official Positions

Effect of hand positioning on idxa precision error for total and regional bone and body

Interpretation Guide. What you are made of? Find out with - Vital Body Scan NZ Ltd. Mobile Body Composition Analysis

Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Body Composition Reference Values from NHANES

Appendicular lean mass index (kg/m 2 ), adjusted for fat mass index. Fat mass index (kg/m 1.2 )

Understanding Clinical Assessment Using The Edmonton Obesity Staging System

UMHS-PUHSC JOINT INSTITUTE

Presenter Disclosure Information Karine Sahakyan, MD, PhD, MPH

Health is Not Measured in Pounds

Lateral Vertebral Analysis DXA Body Composition Quality Assurance in DXA

EFFECT OF TRUNCAL ADIPOSITY ON PLASMA LIPID AND LIPOPROTEIN CONCENTRATIONS

FAT MASS ESTIMATION BY BIOELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS

Lean Body Mass Muscles Ligaments Tendons Bones. Body Fat Fat is fat

ADOLESCENT OBESITY: IS IT BAD FOR THE BONES

Whole Body Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry to Determine Body Composition

9/26/2018. Andy Weiler, M.Ed. September 26 th, 2018

RESULTS SHEET BREAKDOWN

Body Composition Changes Following a Very Low Calorie Pre-Operative Diet in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery

Anthropometry: What Can We Measure & What Does It Mean?

Know Your Number Aggregate Report Single Analysis Compared to National Averages

Fat distribution matters!

Diagnostische Präzision von DXL im Vergleich zu DXA bei pmp Frauen mit Frakturen

Body Mass Index And Breast Size In Women Same Or

THE CHARACTERIZATION OF NORMAL WEIGHT OBESITY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS. Kara Christen Anderson

Understanding & Interpreting Body Composition Measures

Body Composition Course Syllabus and Associated Reading Materials

Empower Preventive Medicine. Timothy J. McCormick, DO, MPH 4221 Baymeadows Suite 6 Jacksonville, FL

Keeping Your Lifetime Warranty: Physical Activity and Health

WEIGHT GAIN DURING MENOPAUSE EMERGING RESEARCH

Dysfunctional Muscle in Aging, Obesity, and Neuromotor Disabilities: The Role of Strength Training to Enhance Health and Human Performance

Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion in Youth: From Normal to Diabetes

Adina Alazraki, MD, FAAP Assistant Professor, Radiology and Pediatrics Emory University School of Medicine Children s Healthcare of Atlanta

K-STATE CROSSFIT PROGRAM EVALUATION SYSTEM NORMATIVE VALUES. Table of Contents

CHAPTER 9. Anthropometry and Body Composition

Whole Body Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) to Determine Body Composition

Weighing in on Whole Grains: A review of Evidence Linking Whole Grains to Body Weight. Nicola M. McKeown, PhD Scientist II

Didactic Series. Lipohypertrophy in HIV

Maryam Pourhassan, Anja Bosy-Westphal, Britta Schautz, Wiebke Braun, Claus-C Glüer, and Manfred J Müller

An evaluation of endurance and combined endurance and resistance training on fitness and C- reactive protein

The True NTH Exercise and Diet Project

Bariatric Surgery and Bone Health

Supplemental Table 1: Demographics and characteristics of study participants. Male, n (%) 3 (20%) 6 (50%) Age, years [mean ± SD] 33.3 ± ± 9.

Relationship between prenatal growth, postnatal growth and childhood obesity: a review

Deakin Research Online

3/25/2010. Age-adjusted incidence rates for coronary heart disease according to body mass index and waist circumference tertiles

Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Measured Regional Body Composition Least Significant Change: Effect of Region of Interest and Gender in Athletes

Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. Aspartame intake is associated with greater glucose intolerance in individuals with obesity

Documentation, Codebook, and Frequencies

Understanding Body Composition

Fitness and Wellness 12th Edition Hoeger TEST BANK Full download at:

Developing nations vs. developed nations Availability of food contributes to overweight and obesity

Healthy aging. It s vital.

Location of body fat and body size impacts DXA soft tissue measures: a simulation study

Energy balance. Factors affecting energy input. Energy input vs. Energy output Balance Negative: weight loss Positive: weight gain

Obesity Medicine for the Adolescent Patient: It Takes The Village

Body composition analysis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in female diabetics differ between manufacturers

BMI may underestimate the socioeconomic gradient in true obesity

Technical data TECHNICAL DATA

Endpoints And Indications For The Older Population

PhenX Measure: Body Composition (#020300) PhenX Protocol: Body Composition - Body Composition by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (#020302)

Comparisons of waist circumferences measured at 4 sites 1 3

Effects of Driver Characteristics on Seat Belt Fit

Bone Metabolism in Postmenopausal Women Influenced by the Metabolic Syndrome

Is there an association between waist circumference and type 2 diabetes or impaired fasting glucose in US adolescents?

The prevalence of obesity in the United States and the

Central and Peripheral Weight Gain Affect Trunk Kinematics and Lower-Extremity Muscle Activation Differently During Sit-To-Stand

Xuane Zhang 1,3, Cuiling Zhu 1, Jingyang Gao 1, Fangyun Mei 1, Jiajing Yin 2,LeBu 1, Xiaoyun Cheng 1, Chunjun Sheng 2 and Shen Qu 1,2*

Obesity and Breast Cancer in a Multiethnic Population. Gertraud Maskarinec, MD, PhD University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI

NHS England. Evidence review: Metreleptin for Congenital Leptin Deficiency

Broadening Course YPHY0001 Practical Session II (October 11, 2006) Assessment of Body Fat

Low-Carbohydrate Diets and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Population-based Cohort Study and Pooling Prospective Studies

THE FAT THERMOSTAT: UNDERSTANDING HOW YOUR BODY BURNS FAT

Chapter 17: Body Composition Status and Assessment

ANTHROPOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME LIMB AND BODY CIRCUMFERENCES IN MALES AND FEMALES WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

Changes in lipid indices and body composition one year after laparoscopic gastrectomy: a prospective study

Body Composition Analyzer

Overall Implementation Strategy/Focus:

Body Composition Assessment Scholars

Medical Policy. MP Whole Body Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry to Determine Body Composition

Broadening Course YPHY0001 Practical Session III (March 19, 2008) Assessment of Body Fat

Preliminary technical data

Package. Your InBody package will include: *Additional accessories can be purchased at

Norland Densitometry A Tradition of Excellence

Transcription:

:3 Image not for diagnostic use k = 1.178, d0 = 40.3 327 x 150 DAP: 13.1 cgy*cm² Region Area (cm²) BMC (g) BMD (g/cm²) T - Z - L Arm 252.57 280.11 1.109 R Arm 269.81 288.33 1.069 L Ribs 155.55 154.55 0.994 R Ribs 152.75 146.30 0.958 T Spine 155.55 164.08 1.055 L Spine 75.37 110.13 1.461 Pelvis 373.65 552.91 1.480 L Leg 443.40 681.31 1.537 R Leg 449.02 663.62 1.478 Subtotal 2327.67 3041.34 1.307 Head 288.25 849.16 2.946 Total 2615.92 3890.50 1.487 2.6 2.5 Total BMD CV 1.0%, ACF = 1.030, BCF = 1.005 T- vs. White Male; Z- vs. White Male. Source:2008 NHANES/Hologic White Male.

Image not for diagnostic use 327 x 150 DAP: 13.1 cgy*cm² T- vs. White Male; Z- vs. White Male. Source:2008 NHANES/Hologic White Male. Scan Date Age BMD (g/cm²) T - BMD Change vs Baseline vs Previous 11.09.2014 43 1.487 2.6 1.1%* 1.1%* 10.07.2014 43 1.471 2.5 0.0% 0.0% 30.05.2014 43 1.471 2.5 * Denotes significance at 95% confidence level, LSC is 0.014 g/cm²

Source: NHANES Classic White Male. World Health Organization Body Mass Index Classification BMI = 26.9 WHO Classification Overweight Images not for diagnostic use Fat Lean Bone BMI has some limitations and an actual diagnosis of overweight or obesity should be made by a health professional. Obesity is associated with heart disease, certain types of cancer, type 2 diabetes, and other health risks. The higher a person's BMI is above 25, the greater their weight-related risks. Body Composition Results Region Fat Lean + BMC (g) Total % Fat %Fat Percentile YN AM L Arm 475 4947 5421 8.76 4 1 R Arm 602 5093 5695 10.6 8 2 Trunk 2844 41464 44308 6.42 2 1 L Leg 1731 13356 15087 11.5 4 1 R Leg 1700 14406 16106 10.6 3 1 Subtotal 7352 79266 86618 8.49 2 1 Head 1084 4573 5657 19.2 Total 8435 83839 92274 9.14 2 1 Android (A) 438 4919 5357 8.2 Gynoid (G) 1528 11667 13195 11.6 Adipose Indices Measure Result YN Percentile AM Total Body % Fat 9.14 2 1 Fat Mass/Height² (kg/m²) 2.52 6 1 Android/Gynoid Ratio 0.71 % Fat Trunk/% Fat Legs 0.58 3 1 Trunk/Limb Fat Mass Ratio 0.63 3 1 Est. VAT 212 Est. VAT Volume (cm³) 229 Est. VAT Area (cm²) 44.0 Lean Indices Measure Result YN Percentile AM Lean/Height² (kg/m²) 23.9 91 88 Appen. Lean/Height² (kg/m²) 10.7 87 86 Est. VAT = Estimated Visceral Adipose Tissue YN = Young Normal AM = Age Matched BAR1904

Region BMC (g) Fat Lean Lean + BMC (g) Total % Fat L Arm 280 474.7 4666.6 4946.7 5421.4 8.8 R Arm 288 602.2 4804.3 5092.6 5694.8 10.6 Trunk 1128 2843.7 40336.4 41464.4 44308.1 6.4 L Leg 681 1731.3 12674.6 13355.9 15087.2 11.5 R Leg 664 1699.9 13742.7 14406.3 16106.2 10.6 Subtotal 3041 7351.8 76224.6 79265.9 86617.8 8.5 Head 849 1083.7 3723.7 4572.9 5656.6 19.2 Total 3891 8435.5 79948.3 83838.8 92274.3 9.1 TBAR1904

Total Body % Fat Results Scan Date Age %Fat Percentile YN AM Baseline Previous 11.09.2014 43 9.14 2 1-4.0-2.8 10.07.2014 43 11.9 7 1-1.3-1.3 30.05.2014 43 13.2 11 2 Total Fat Mass Results Scan Date Age Fat Change/Month vs Baseline Previous Baseline Previous 11.09.2014 43 8435-1371 -1508-4639 -3071 10.07.2014 43 11506-1193 -1193-1568 -1568 30.05.2014 43 13075 Source: NHANES Classic White Male. Total Lean Mass Results Scan Date Age Lean Change/Month vs (g) Baseline Previous Baseline Previous 11.09.2014 43 79948.3-697 -591-2357 -1203 10.07.2014 43 81151.2-878 -878-1154 -1154 30.05.2014 43 82305.4 Total Mass Results Scan Date Age Change/Month vs Baseline Previous Baseline Previous 11.09.2014 43 92274-2053 -2070-6949 -4216 10.07.2014 43 96490-2080 -2080-2733 -2733 30.05.2014 43 99223 YN = Young Normal AM = Age Matched 30.05.2014 10.07.2014 11.09.2014 Images not for diagnostic use