Consultant Services to Kansas Family Physicians

Similar documents
I-1 TIME SERIES - MOST RECENT FIVE YEARS Field of post-m.d. training and source of funding

Physicians by County then Specialty

Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision Certification Boards & SubSpecialties

TABLE D-1 POST-M.D. TRAINEES EXITING QUEBEC TRAINING PROGRAMS IN JULY, 2014 AT THE COMPLETION OF POST-M.D. TRAINING

ANESTHESIOLOGY Comments:

Letter to the AMGA Board of Directors... 1 Introduction... 3

2017 ST3 Competition Ratios Medical Specialties

Table 1 ABMS MEMBER BOARDS APPROVED GENERAL CERTIFICATES

CFO Council. Physician Compensation Trends. Survey Challenges

Number of Accredited Programs

POST-M.D. TRAINEES EXITING ALBERTA TRAINING PROGRAMS IN JULY, 2015 AT THE COMPLETION OF POST-M.D

Letter to the AMGA Board of Directors...1 Introduction...3

Physicians by Specialty

SPECIALTY CPT CODES DESCRIPTION

Letter to the AMGA Board of Directors... 1 Introduction... 3

To enroll multiple users into training classes follow the below instructions:

Geographic Location, Field of Post-M.D. Training

AVMED SPECIALIST/SPECIALTIES REQUIRING MEDICARE REFERRAL

Physicians by Specialty

Physicians by Specialty

Physicians by County then Specialty

Letter to the AMGA Board of Directors...1 Introduction...3

Welcome to the Health Center Referring Practitioner Survey

Electives Diversification Policy

Geographic Location, Field of Post-M.D. Training

Block III Clinical Electives for MSU-CHM Students only

M4 Coursework Information

Outside Records MPage FAQs December, 2018

Appendix A Residents and Fellows Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Certification Requirements by Program

Capitol Hill / Main Building

UNC GI Clinics UNC GI Procedures

EHR SOFTWARE COMPARISON

Field of Post-M.D. Training

SullivanCotter 2012 Physician Compensation and Productivity Survey

MEDICINE/PEDIATRICS PROGRAM CURRICULUM OVERVIEW. A = Ambulatory I = Inpatient C = Combined

Mercy Health Corporation (WI)

Long-stay patients methodology Published by NHS England and NHS Improvement

Specialty-specific References for DIOs: Expected Time for Coordinator

Application Deadlines

Academic Year Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Data Resource Book

Hawaii Physician Workforce Assessment 2015

Utility of Social Networks For Physicians and Life Sciences Companies. January 2011

Application Deadlines

Application Deadlines

Physician Opportunities in Canada

SPECIALTY SAUSHEC EAMC MAMC TAMC NCC WBAMC DARNALL WRAIR AFIP KELLER USUHS NAVY

Insights Into Physician Behavior AMM Meeting February 12, MARS Medical Med/Surg Readership Study December 2008

Application Deadlines

Application Deadlines

EJEMPLARES DE HOSPITAL J. J. AGUIRRE RECIBIDOS EN EL MES DE JULIO DE 2004

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Specialty and Subspecialty Competency Lists Matched to the Foundational Reference List *,

The MGH Journey. Shaping the Future of an Entire Region

SXF WOMENS HLTH MFM ORTMAN CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY YANKTON ANESTHESIOLOGY PC LANDMANN JUNGMAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION

Elenco dei periodici elettronici in Ovid Full text

TABLE D-1 POST-M.D. TRAINEES EXITING ONTARIO TRAINING PROGRAMS IN JULY, 2013 AT THE COMPLETION OF POST-M.D. TRAINING

SOUTH DAKOTA CLINICS

New Hanover Regional Medical Center, NC

PHYSICIAN (MD/DO) Varies by specialty: $150,000-$700,000. University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, University of Pikeville

AMA PHYSICIAN COUNTS

Hybrid Open Access Journals

Telemedicine Centre. All India Institute of Medical College,Bhopal. Statistics of Video Conferencing [October 2013-December 2017]

Impact of WRVU Changes. Allowed Charges (Millions)


Document Folders and Sub Folders

TIERED NETWORK. Beginning in 2017, you can select the Hendricks Regional Health Tiered Network, created just for employees of Avon Schools.

Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease Annual Review Pathology 2011-till date

Ovid-Lippincott Journals

Reference Guide. Adele Hall (816) CMH Kansas (913) East (816) Northland (816)

AMMENDED REPORT TO THE 2015 LEGISLATURE. Report on Findings from the Hawai i Physician Workforce Assessment Project

Clinical Summary Note. Digital photographs. Echo Cardiogram. Mammogram. Angiogram. BMD scan Pet scan. Xray US

1 of 9 6/25/17 1:22 AM

Improve the lives we touch through medical education, innovations, research and quality healthcare.

Journal Subsciption Rate (Print) + Online Free Year: 2019 Postage, Shipping and handling is FREE (3 times in a year) Website:

2017 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule Summary

Identical letters were also sent to Chairman/Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee and House Energy and Commerce Committee

Precyse University ICD-10 Education Tracks

Mercy Health Corporation (WI)

B30 Intensive Care Unit High Care Unit B31 Nephrology and Dialysis Center

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Archive Journal Collection

Curriculum Overview for 1 st year students of English Division of the Medical Faculty Medical University of Gdańsk Academic Year 2016/2017

2018 Specialty Society Delegate Apportionment

Here is the list of journals reviewed by eclips Consult:

Meetings and Presentation Opportunities. Rahul Panesar, MD Associate Professor Division of Critical Care Medicine

Adverse Event Process / Crisis Management

5 American Journal of Kidney Diseases Elsevier NEPHROLOGY Science Direct

PARAMEDIC COURSE OBJECTIVES

System Capacity and Population Needs. Excerpt from Tarrant County Long Range Planning Report

Helen Burstin, MD, MPH, FACP Executive Vice President & CEO Council of Medical Specialty Societies. November 28, 2017 ECRI Annual Conference

ERAS/NRMP Task Force Report January 2018

HOSPITAL MEDICINE BECOMING A PHYSICIAN

OCHSNER PHYSICIAN PARTNERS. PQRS Measures by Specialty (FINAL)

Graduate Medical Education,

Production Scientific EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Quartile. Impact. factor. documents. Total of. Journal ISSN

University of Dayton Department of Physician Assistant Education course descriptions (updated April 3, 2017)

Limitations of the HRG Tariff: The trim point

The NZ Role Delineation Model

Reliance ehealth Collaborative Data Contributor Roster December 2018

ABP Workforce Data COPS FALL MEETING SEPTEMBER 2015 CHICAGO, IL. The American Board of Pediatrics

Building Successful Telemedicine Programs/Applications Overview

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. OvidSP

Transcription:

Consultant Services to Kansas Family Physicians The purpose of this study is to track the use of consultants. An e-mail survey was sent to 114 Kansas family physicians The survey was launched on 11/25/2009 and closed 12/31/2009 The total response rate was 45% (51/114) Age Years in Practice Average 51.5 20.9 Range 33-81 2-56 Average Range Average Range Male (n=33) 54.9 33-81 24.9 2-56 Female (n=18) 45.3 36-60 21.2 6-29 Size of community in which you practice Count Percent <5,000 15 29% 5,000-24,999 8 16% 25,000-75,000 6 12% >75,000 22 43% AGE Size of practice community Median Average Range <5,000 44 47 34-65 5,000-24,999 57 55 33-72 25,000-75,000 55 57 38-81 >75,000 55 52 40-64 Years in Practice Size of practice community Median Average Range <5,000 11 16 2-40 5,000-24,999 28.5 21 4-40 25,000-75,000 22 27 11-56 >75,000 23 24 10-32 I make a personal call to the consultant My office staff works with the consultant s office staff to schedule a visit I send a note or e-mail to the consultant I admit the patient to the hospital and ask for in-patient consultation Usually Occasionally Rarely Not answered 12% 51% 33% 4% 84% 10% 4% 2% 47% 25% 22% 6% 8% 20% 67% 6% 1

What percentage of your patients are seen by consultants in a timely fashion (meeting the patient s needs and appropriate for the nature of the problem) Size of practice 5,000-25,000- Total community <5,000 24,999 75,000 >75,000 >90% of the time 33% 13% 67% 41% 37% >75% of the time 53% 75% 36% 43% >50% of the time 13% 13% 17% 23% 18% Other 17% 2% In your geographic service area, specialties that are usually very timely in doing consultations Specialty # % of physicians n=51 Cardiology 43 84% General surgery 34 67% Orthopaedics 33 65% ENT 16 31% Urology 15 29% Gastroenterology 9 18% Ob/gyn 8 16% Oncology 7 14% Nephrology 6 12% Dermatology 5 10% Pulmonary 5 medicine 10% Pediatrics 4 8% Neurology 3 6% 2 Specialty # % of physicians n=51 Gynecology 2 4% Neurosurgery 2 4% Ophthalmology 2 4% Breast surgery 1 2% Dental 1 2% Endocrinology 1 2% Eye 1 2% Hospitalists 1 2% Internal medicine 1 2% Pain management 1 2% Physiatry 1 2% Psychiatry 1 2% Radiology 1 2% Renal 1 2% Specialty <5,000 n=15 5,000-24,999 n=8 25,000-75,000 n=6 >75,000 n=22 Cardiology 87% 88% 50% 91% General Surgery 80% 75% 67% 55% Orthopedics 67% 75% 67% 59% ENT 27% 13% 50% 32% Urology 33% 13% 50% 27% Gastroenterology 7% 17% 32% OB/GYN 20% 13% 33% 9% Oncology 7% 38% 17% 9% Nephrology 33% 18% Pulmonology 7% 25% 14% Dermatology 7% 25% 9% Pediatrics 20% 17% Neurology 7% 9% Gynecology 13% 5% Neurosurgery 13% 17% Ophthalmology 17% 5% Dental 17% 0%

Specialty <5,000 n=15 5,000-24,999 n=8 25,000-75,000 n=6 >75,000 n=22 Endocrinology 5% Endoscopy 5% Eye 17% Hospitalists 5% Internal Medicine 17% Pain management 5% Physiatry 7% Psychiatry 7% Radiology 5% Renal 13% Surgery-breast 13% In your geographic service area, specialties that are often difficult for patients to access in a timely fashion Specialty # % of physicians n=51 Neurology 37 73% Rheumatology 22 43% Dermatology 20 39% Psychiatry/ 16 31% Psychology Neurosurgery 11 22% Endocrinology 8 16% Gastroenterology 8 16% Pulmonary medicine 7 14% Pain management 6 12% Orthopaedics 5 10% Developmental pediatrics 3 6% ENT 2 4% 3 Specialty # % of physicians n=51 Peds subspecialties 2 4% Plastic surgery 2 4% Urology 2 4% Allergy/immunology 1 2% Cardiology 1 2% Child psych 1 2% Gynecology 1 2% Infectious disease 1 2% Internal medicine 1 2% Neonatal 1 2% Nephrology 1 2% Ob/gyn 1 2% Ortho spine specialist 1 2% Pediatrics 1 2% Specialty <5,000 n=15 5,000-24,999 n=8 25,000-75,000 n=6 >75,000 n=22 Neurology 87% 100% 17% 73% Rheumatology 53% 38% 50% Dermatology 47% 38% 50% 32% Psychiatry 27% 25% 50% 27% Neurosurgery 13% 25% 17% 27% Endocrinology 13% 27% Gastroenterology 33% 13% 9% Pulmonology 13% 13% 33% 9% Orthopedics 7% 25% 17% 9% Pain Management 7% 13% 0% 14% Developmental pediatrics 17% 9% ENT 9%

Specialty <5,000 n=15 5,000-24,999 n=8 25,000-75,000 n=6 >75,000 n=22 Pediatric subspecialties 17% 5% Urology 7% 13% Allergy and immunology 5% Cardiology 17% Child psychiatry 7% General Surgery 5% Gynecology 7% Infectious disease 5% Internal medicine 13% Neonatal 5% Nephrology 13% OB/GYN 7% Otologists 5% Pediatric neurology 5% Pediatrics 17% Plastic surgery 5% Specialties in both categories Timely Difficult Cardiology 43 84% 1 2% Dermatology 5 10% 20 39% EENT 16 31% 2 4% Endocrinology 1 2% 8 16% Gastroenterology 9 18% 8 16% Gynecology 2 4% 1 2% Internal medicine 1 2% 1 2% Nephrology 6 12% 1 2% Neurology 3 6% 37 73% Neurosurgery 2 4% 11 22% Ob/gyn 8 16% 1 2% Orthopaedics 33 65% 5 10% Pain management 1 2% 6 12% Pediatrics 4 8% 1 2% Psychiatry 1 2% 16 31% Pulmonary medicine 5 10% 7 14% Urology 15 29% 2 4% 4

For specialty you ranked in that are often difficult for patients to access in a timely fashion, rank the s to the problem. Allergy and immunology n=1 Cardiology n=1 Child Psychology n=1 5

Dermatology n=15 1 4 1 timely access 2 7 7 5 9 Consultants seem aloof... hard to get in contact with 3 6 6 problems 3 5 7 uninsured) 6 5 5 ENT n=2 1 timely access 2 Consultants aren t interested in a high patient volume 2 Consultants seem aloof... hard to get in contact with 2 1 uninsured) 2 Endocrinology n=6 Inadequate specialist resources for the need 4 2 3 2 5 5 problems 2 4 uninsured) 2 1 3 6

Gastroenterology n=3 Inadequate specialist resources for the need 3 2 2 2 problems 3 2 General Surgery n=1 Internal medicine n=1 7

Nephrology n=1 Neurology n=37 Inadequate specialist resources for the need 28 8 1 timely access 4 16 17 Consultants aren t interested in a high patient volume 9 12 15 Consultants seem aloof... hard to get in contact with 5 9 22 problems 4 12 20 uninsured) 4 18 14 Neurosurgery n=10 Inadequate specialist resources for the need 8 2 timely access 2 4 4 4 5 Consultants seem aloof... hard to get in contact with 5 4 problems 7 2 uninsured) 4 2 3 8

OB/GYN n=10 Orthopedics n=4 Inadequate specialist resources for the need 3 1 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 uninsured) 2 2 Otologist n=1 9

Pain management n=1 1 1 1 1 1 uninsured) 2 Developmental pediatrics n=2 Inadequate specialist resources for the need 2 1 1 1 1 Neonatal n=1 10

Pediatric neurology n=1 Pediatric subspecialties n=2 Inadequate specialist resources for the need 2 1 1 1 1 uninsured) 2 Pediatrics n=1 11

Psychiatry n=1 0 4 timely access 8 6 10 3 Consultants seem aloof... hard to get in contact with 2 7 5 problems 3 3 8 6 7 Pulmonology n=6 Inadequate specialist resources for the need 3 3 timely access 3 3 Consultants aren t interested in a high patient volume 3 3 Consultants seem aloof... hard to get in contact with 2 4 problems 3 3 uninsured) 3 3 Rheumatology n=6 5 3 timely access 2 8 8 Consultants aren t interested in a high patient volume 3 7 8 2 5 problems 3 9 5 10 5 12

Urology n=2 Inadequate specialist resources for the need 2 1 Consultants aren t interested in a high patient volume 2 Consultants seem aloof... hard to get in contact with 2 problems 2 uninsured) 2 How frequently do you encounter these problems in consultations you arrange for your patients? The consultant < once a < once a < once a week month year rarely Does not discuss consultation findings with the patient or family. 22% 29% 22% 24% Does not call you or send you a report of the consultation 20% 33% 18% 24% Keeps your patient and doesn t send him/her back to you for ongoing care 2% 27% 24% 43% Sends the patient on to another consultant without discussing it with you 12% 39% 18% 25% Suggests to your patient that you were not doing a good job in your medical 2% 27% 63% care Suggests or says that the consultation was not worthwhile or inappropriate 14% 27% 53% Ignores the question of the consultation and takes off in a different direction 12% 33% 49% Doesn t pay attention to the background letter, labs, tests, or my thoughts on the case 10% 22% 24% 39% On reflection, when I seek a consultation I feel I Generally provide a clearly stated concern and give solid background information 35% Could sometimes do a better job of presenting the issue and providing background information 63% Often fall short in how I present the problem and provide background material 2% Other 13