EFFECTS OF SUB-LETHAL DOSES OF UREA ON PREGNANT CATTLE

Similar documents
A COMPARISON OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATES FOR WOOL GROWTH. W. F. COLEBROOK*, K. A. FERGUSON*, J. A. HEMSLEY,* J. P. HOGAN*, P. J. REIS* and R. H.

268 Trop Anim Prod :3

Chapter-6 Feed formulation - nutrients requirement for different category of dairy animals, balanced/complete ration, methods of feed formulation

Milk Urea Nitrogen Evaluation in Louisiana Dairy Herds

THE TRANSFER OF NITROGEN FROM THE BLOOD TO THE RUMEN IN SHEEP. [Manuscript received March 14, 1967] Summary

The Effects of Feeding MIN-AD and Sodium Bicarbonate on Early Lactation Performance of Dairy Cattle

L. E. Phillip, M.V. Simpson, E. S. Idziak H and S.F. Kubow*

PIONEER FEEDS DAIRY CATTLE AND CALF FEEDING TECHNICAL INFORMATION.

EFFECTS OF DAILY OR WEEKLY FEEDING OF WHEAT ON WOOL PRODUCTION. M. K. HILL*, M. J. WATSON and G. L. McCLYMONT

THE EFFECT OF UREA BLOCK SUPPLEMENTATION ON THE UTILISATION OF ROUGHAGE BY SHEEP

EFFECT OF WATER, NITROGEN AND POTASSIUM LOADING ON SODIUM RETENTION BY CATTLE ON A LOW SODIUM INTAKE. D. W. HENNESSY and G. L.

Response of Growing Calves Fed graded Levels of Farm Kernel Meal as Nitrogen Source. By: *Gidado, A. S., **Nasiru M. and **Haruna, U.

MANAGING THE DAIRY COW DURING THE DRY PERIOD

Introduction to MUN. What is Urea

56 Trop Anim Prod :1

FACTORS AFFECTING MANURE EXCRETION BY DAIRY COWS 1

NITROGEN AND ENERGY SUPPLEMENTS FOR LOW QUALITY ROUGHAGES INTRODUCTION JANE LEIBHOLZ*

Dietary Protein. Dr. Mark McGuire Dr. Jullie Wittman AVS Department University of Idaho

28. Ketosis and Urea Poisoning

INCLUSION OF FAT IN DIETS FOR EARLY LACTATING HOLSTEIN COWS. J. E. Shirley and M. E. Scheffel

Evaluating by-products for inclusion in ruminant and monogastric diets

Basic Cow Nutrition. Dr. Matt Hersom 1

A STUDY OF THE PLASMA SODIUM AND POTASSIUM LEVELS IN NORMAL MERINO SHEEP

Potash Development Association FERTILISERS AND HYPOMAGNESAEMIA: AN HISTORIC EXAGGERATION?

Effects of Age, Environments and Sex on Plasma Metabolite Levels in Young Holstein Calves

Basic Requirements. Meeting the basic nutrient requirements

Department of Physiology Obafemi Awolowo College of Health Sciences Olabisi Onabanjo University P.M.B 2005 Ikenne Ogun State

Study Report Effects of Corn Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) Under Hot Summer Conditions in Lactating Dairy Cows

Title. Issue Date Doc URL. Type. File Information THE RUMEN DEGRADABILITY OF PROTEIN FOR VARIOUS FEEDS.

Studies on Some Serum Constituents of Dairy Cows in Saudi Arabia

R. G. WHITE* and R. A. LENG*

Animal Industry Report

INFLUENCE OF ADDITIVE AIV-2000 AND PRE-WILTED BIG BALE ON SILAGE QUALITY, ANIMAL PERFORMANCE AND RUMEN METABOLISM. J. Jatkauskas and V.

Feeding the Suckler Cow by Siobhan Kavanagh, Mark McGee, Liam Fitzgerald

PROTEIN LIMITS TO PRODUCTION IN RUMINANTS

Title. Author(s)Liu, Jian Xin; OKUBO, Masahiko; KONDO, Seiji; SEKINE. Issue Date Doc URL. Type. File Information OF DIGESTA

High Rates of Selenium Supplementation for Sheep to Determine Selenium Retention via Forage Fertilization

Feeding the Doe Herd. Lyle W. McNichol PAg. Lyle McNichol Livestock Consulting Services

URGENT NEWS. Grass Silage Update No 144: Grass Silage Update /2011. Fermentation quality and intake characteristics

Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle E-974

Hypocalcaemia and Hypomagnesaemia

FEEDING and MANAGEMENT OF DAMASCUS GOATS CYPRUS EXPERIENCE By Miltiades Hadjipanayiotou

SUPPLEMENTARY FEEDING OF GRAZING SHEEP - ITS EFFECT ON PASTURE INTAKE ByJ.M. HOLDER*

... Urea supplements for beef cattle. Protein equivalent. When can cattle use urea? How do cattle use urea? "~~ ~ ~

Effective Practices In Sheep Production Series

FORAGE = BEEF (1) The researchers compared three diets for cows on dormant winter range: 1. Control (no supplement) 2. Corn Gluten Feed. 3.

Product Manual Ruminants

The Diploma in Ruminant Nutrition

The use of polyethylene glycol as a marker for measuring rumen water volume and the rate of flow of water from the rumen of grazing sheep

SULFUR METABOLISM IN RUMINANTS. II. IN VIVO AVAILABILITY OF VARIOUS CHEMICAL FORMS OF SULFUR

Applied Beef Nutrition Ration Formulation Short Course. Beef Ration and Nutrition Decision Software

Exercise 2 Feed Composition and Nutrient Requirements 20 Points

The Use of Apple Pomace in Rice Straw Based Diets of Korean Native Goats (Capra hircus)

Bogor Agricultural University, *

CRYSTALLINE PEPSIN V. ISOLATION OF CRYSTALLINE PEPSIN FROM BOVINE GASTRIC JUICE BY JOHN H. NORTHROP

Rearing the Beef Bred Calf

Basic Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cows 1

The effect of age on in sacco estimates of rumen dry matter and crude protein degradability in veal calves

Forage Quality and Livestock Nutrition on Pasture. Patrick Davis, Ph. D. Johnson County MU Extension Livestock Specialist

M. C. FRANKLIN MEMORIAL SYMPOSIUM THE SURVIVAL FEEDING OF BEEF CATTLE DURING DROUGHT

Effects of Vitamin A Supplementation on Plasma Retinol Concentrations, Fertility and Milk Yield of Dairy Cows

M. C. FRANKLIN MEMORIAL SYMPOSIUM DROUGHT FEEDING OF SHEEP

EFFECTS OF FREQUENT MILKING ON MILK SECRETION DURING LACTATION IN THE GOAT: RELATION TO FACTORS WHICH LIMIT THE RATE OF SECRETION

An investigation into reduced milk production following dietary alteration on an Irish dairy farm

A Factorial Approach to Energy Supplementation for Grazing Beef Cattle

EC256 Urea as a Protein Extender for Ruminants

FINAL REPORT: MARINE MAGNESIUM TRIAL. Presented by Christian Cruywagen Department of Animal Sciences Stellenbosch University South Africa

Dietary Supplements: A Necessity or Folly?

Beef Cattle Handbook

Nutrition Building the Foundation

By: Dr. Patrick Davis, University of Missouri Extension County Livestock Specialist Jeff Yearington, Lincoln University Farm Outreach Worker West

Supplementary crude protein and phosphorus levels: effect on spring milk production in dairy cows Michael Reid 1,2

Compact Total Mixed Rations for Dairy Cattle (Compact TMR)

Supplementation of High Corn Silage Diets for Dairy Cows. R. D. Shaver Professor and Extension Dairy Nutritionist

Dalesman Buckets & blocks

NUTRITION, FEEDING, AND CALVES Estimation of Plasma Volume in Holstein and Jersey Calves

EFFECTS OF WHOLE COTTONSEED, COTTONSEED OIL OR ANIMAL FAT ON DIGESTIBILITY OF WHEAT STRAW DIETS BY STEERS'

INTERPRETING FORAGE QUALITY TEST REPORTS

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTAL ZINC AND MANGANESE ON IN VITRO UREA DEGRADATION AND PRAIRIE HAY DISAPPEARANCE

Trace Element Deficiencies in Heifers

SUPPLEMENTAL CHOLINE FOR PREVENTION AND ALLEVIATION OF FATTY LIVER IN DAIRY CATTLE

Response of Ruminants to Protein Supplementation is Affected by Type of Low-quality Forage 1

Balanced nutritional solutions for optimal animal performance

EFFECT OF INCREASING DIETARY ENERGY CONSUMPTION ON INTAKE, DIGESTION, AND RUMINAL FERMENTATION IN LIMIT-FED STEERS

THE INTAKE AND DIGESTIBILITY OF SILAGES MADE FROM DOLICHOS LABLAB L. ALONE AND WITH SORGHUM CV. SUGARDRIP

Managing Cows in Early Lactatoin. Glanbia Early Lactation Management

Niacin for Growing Sheep and Steers

Phosphorus nutrition & management overcoming constraints to wider adoption

Feed Management to Improve Nitrogen and Phosphorus Efficiency. Charles C. Stallings Professor and Extension Dairy Scientist Virginia Tech

world leaders in bolus technology

Understanding Dairy Nutrition Terminology

Protein in Beef Cattle Diets

Managing the Transition Cow

Rotavec Corona Emulsion for injection for cattle. Introduction. Company name: MSD Animal Health. Address: Walton Manor. Walton. Milton Keynes MK7 7AJ

Forage Testing and Supplementation

Yeast Product Supplementation Influences Feeding Behavior and Measures of Immune Function in Transition Dairy Cows

Nonstructural and Structural Carbohydrates in Dairy Cattle Rations 1

EFFECT OF SODIUM BICARBONATE IN THE DRINKING WATER OF RUMINANTS ON THE DIGESTIBILITY OF A PELLETED COMPLETE RATION 1

Phase B 5 Questions Correct answers are worth 10 points each.

CHAMPION TOC INDEX. Characteristics of Common Feed Grains. Darryl Gibb. Take Home Message

Transcription:

EFFECTS OF SUB-LETHAL DOSES OF UREA ON PREGNANT CATTLE J. W. RYLEY* and R. J. W. GARTNER* Summary Six pregnant cows received, by injection into the rumen, 0.20 to 0.30 g urea/kg body-weight at 104 to 148 days of pregnancy, 0.35 g/kg at 124 to 169 days of pregnancy, 0.35 g/kg at 208 to 226 days of pregnancy and 0.30 g/kg at 256 to 273 days of pregnancy. The change in blood ammonia concentration was followed for approximately seven hours after dosing. Five cows survived until calving and gave birth to healthy calves after gestation periods of 281 to 287 days. Thus, it appears that sudden access to a high intake of urea is unlikely to result in abortion or stillbirths. One cow receiving 0.35 g/kg at 208 days of pregnancy and a further two nonpregnant cows receiving 0.40 g and 0.45 g/kg under the same experimental conditions died from urea toxicity. In cows receiving non-fatal doses of 0.20, 0.25, 0.30 and 0.35 g urea/kg, the mean maximum increases of blood ammonia-nitrogen concentration were 3.1, 3.4, 6.1 and 6.0 pg/ml respectively. The three animals receiving fatal doses of 0.35, 0.40 and 0.45 g/kg had maximum blood ammonia-nitrogen increases of 27.1, 22.0 and 19.5 pg/ml at the final samplings 60, 13 and 15 min before death respectively. I. INTRQDUCTION During recent years there has been a considerable increase in the supplementation of grazing cattle with feedstuffs containing urea, particularly those provided in the block form. Associated with this increase in usage, there have been occasional reports of suspected abortion and/or stillbirths in cattle. As cattle in Queensland are grazed under extensive conditions, there is often little differentiation between pre- and post-natal wastage, and these reports have been either not well authenticated or other possible causes have not been eliminated. In view of the reports it was desirable to examine experimentally the possibility that dietary urea adversely affected the bovine foetus. It was considered that if abortions or stillbirths resulted, they would be associated with the intake of a near-fatal dose of urea, as could occur with group supplementation. This paper records the results of studies on the dosing of pregnant cattle with urea. As Dinning et CEI. (1948) and Repp et az. (1955) showed that elevated blood ammonia values were associated with urea toxicity, determinations of this constituent were made at each dosing. II. MATERIALS AND METHODS (a) Animals Six Hereford cows were used in the main study. These animals were between 104 and 148 days pregnant and varied in body-weight from 323 to 445 kg at the start of the experiment. *Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Animal Research Institute, YeerongpilIy. 385

Two non-pregnant Hereford cows with body-weights of 376 kg and 415 kg were used to determine the fatal dose of urea under the conditions of the experiment. (b) Animal Management The animals were housed in individual stalls and each received daily a ration of Paspcclum dilatatum chaff ad libitum (4.7% crude protein in dry matter) supplemented with 1.4 kg lucerne chaff (17.4% crude protein in dry matter). On the days that urea was administered to the experimental animals, they were removed from the stalls at 0700 h and the urea was injected 1.5 to 2.0 h later. Neither feed nor water was available from 0700 until 1700 h, when the animals were -returned to the stalls. The cows were weighed between 0700 and 0800 h on the day prior to dosing and the calves were weighed within 16 h of birth. (c) Administration of Urea The calculated dose of urea was dissolved in one litre of distilled water and injected into the rumen with a 23 cm needle. The two non-pregnant cattle received 0.40 g/kg (total dose 146.8 g) and 0.45 g/kg (total dose 186.8 g) urea to determine whether, under the conditions of the experiment, these dose rates resulted in death. As these amounts proved fatal, the six pregnant animals received doses varying from 0.20 to 0.30 g/kg at the first series of observations. Because no clinical signs of urea toxicity were observed at these levels, the doses for the second and third series were increased to 0.35 g/kg. One animal succumbed to urea toxicity during the third series, so the dose was reduced to 0.30 g/kg for the fourth observation made in late pregnancy. The body-weight, dose rate of urea and the stage of pregnancy at each of the observations are given in Table 1.. (d) Blood Ammonia Determinations Duplicate samples of jugular blood for blood ammonia determinations were obtained prior to administration of urea, at approximately 30 min intervals for the next 4 h and then at approximately 60 min intervals for a further 3 h. A 2 ml syringe was used to obtain blood from the jugular vein and the 2 ml sample was transferred immediately to a test tube containing 2 ml of cold 20% (w/v) trichloracetic acid. The test tubes were kept in a container of ice then centrifuged at approximately -5 C within 60 min of sampling. One ml of supematant was pipetted into a 25 ml bottle containing 1 ml of 40% potastium hydroxide and the ammonia was diffused and determined as described by Seligson and Seligson (1951). Satisfactory recoveries of ammonia were obtained from trichloracetic acid solutions and from blood using either saturated potassium carbonate or 40% potassium hydroxide. However, subsequent results showed that potassium hydroxide gave higher basal values than potassium carbonate apparently due to breakdown of nitrogenous compounds not precipitated by the trichloracetic acid. For this reason basal values prior to treatment have been subtracted from values after treatment. On each of six days during the third series of observations, one of the six experimental cows received urea and another received one litre of distilled water by injection into the rumen. This allowed a study of diurnal changes in blood ammonia in untreated animals under the conditions of the experiment. Thus; 386

TABLE 1

during the experiment results on blood ammonia were available on 6 animals not receiving urea, and for 2, 2, 6, 12, 1 and 1 animals receiving 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40 and 0.45 g urea/kg respectively. III. RESULTS Five of the 6 pregnant cows survived and gave birth to healthy calves. The mean gestation length was 282.8 (S.D. -t- 2.2) days and the mean birth weight was 3 1.0 (S.D. f- 6.6) kg. Animal no. 2 died from urea poisoning during the third series of observations and following administration of 0.35 g/kg urea. The animal showed hyperaesthesia, muscle trembling and slight ataxia after 85 min. Thereafter, clinical signs progressed; the animal sh0we.d excessive salivation, frothing from the mouth, laboured respiration, muscular spasms and finally became prostrate. It died 3.0 h after receiving the urea. The non-pregnant cow, receiving 0.40 g/kg urea, showed initial signs of toxicity 150 min after administration and died 45 min later. The cow receiving 0.45 g/kg had initial signs within 60 min and succumbed 285 min after dosing. Both these cows had progressive clinical signs similar to those observed in animal no. 2. Blood ammonia-nitrogen levels expressed as the values above initial levels for all animals studied are shown in Figure 1. There was little diurnal variation in the animals receiving no urea, all mean levels recorded being lower than initial values. The maximum mean decline was 1.1 pg/ml of blood at 390 min (mean) after initial sampling. Animals receiving 0.20 and 0.25 g of urea/kg body-weight had mean maximum recorded increases of 3.1 and 3.4 pg/ml of blood 95 and 125 min respectively after dosing and declined gradually to below initial levels at the 6 h sampling. Concentrations in animals receiving 0.30 and 0.35 g urea/kg and showing no clinical signs of toxicity rose to mean maximum levels of 6#.1 and 6.0 pg/ml above initial levels tended to plateau for a longer period than in those receiving lower levels, but declined to levels approximating initial levels 6.5 h after dosing. The three animals receiving the fatal doses, 0.35, 0.40 and 0.45 g/kg urea, showed a rapid and continuing increase in blood ammonia-nitrogen concentration. Maximum increases were 27.1, 22.0 and 19.5 pg/ml respectively and were recorded at the final samplings 60, 13 and 1 5 min before death. IV. DISCUSSION The toxic dose of urea is dependent on a number of factors such as diet (Clark, Qyaert and Quin 1951), rate of administration (Dinning et al. 1948), and period of starvation (Davis and Roberts 1959). In this experiment one type of ration was given and the animals were dosed at a standard time after feed was available. Under these conditions 0.40 g/kg and 0.45 g/kg proved fatal to the only animals receiving those dose rates while 0.35 g/kg was fatal on one of 12 occasions. Thus, each of the pregnant animals received a dose rate (0.30 or 0.35 g/kg) slightly below the fatal dose on at least three occasions at different stages of pregnancy. All five animals produced viable calves. Although not conclusive because of the small number of animals involved, it would appear that a sudden high intake of urea is unlikely to result in abortion or stillbirths. 388

The effect of lengthy ingestion of high levels of urea by pregnant animals was not studied in this experiment. In this regard, Ryley (1961) recorded two abortions in 10 cows receiving 42.5 g (1.5 oz) urea/head/day but in the same experiment there were no abortions in a similar group given 71 g/head/day. Ryley (unpublished) also gave 227 g (8 oz) urea/head/day to a group of 20 cows, receiving a paspalum hay-sorghum silage ration, for the last 120 days (mean) of pregnancy. The amount of urea in the ration of these cows had been gradually in? creased from 57 to 227 g (2 to 8 oz)/head/day over a period of 42 days. Nineteen cows produced live calves and one aborted from undetermined causes at 140 days gestation, 88 days after commencement of urea feeding. Since Erb and Holtz (1958) recorded an abortion rate of 5.9% in clinically normal cows, it is probable that this abortion was unrelated to the feeding of urea. Toxic dose rates of urea recorded in the literature have been recalculated to a g/kg basis, in order to compare our results with those of other workers. Russell, Hale and Hubbert (1962) reviewed different values recorded for the toxic level of single doses of urea and these ranged from 0.40 to 0.88 g/kg in sheep and from 0.27 to 0.32 g/kg in cattle. Their own experiments produced mortality in sheep with doses ranging from 0.28 to 0.72 g/kg. Subsequently 389

Oltjen et QZ. (1963) reported deaths in sheep after dosing with 0.44 and 0.55 g/kg. These levels can be compared with those of 0.35 to 0.45 g/kg found toxic in our cows. Obviously the toxic dose is variable and as mentioned previously depends on a number of factors. With the exception of the statement by Davis and Roberts (1959) that no cattle survived in which values for blood ammonia-nitrogen rose above 40 pg/ml, no information could be found on blood ammonia concentrations in cattle following urea administration. In comparisons of our data with those for sheep, published results have been recalculated to the units used in the present paper and values are expressed as increases in blood ammonium-nitrogen above preadministration- levels. In sheep, the onset of clinical signs were reported at values of 8 to 12,pg/ml (Lewis, Hill and Annison 1957), 6 to 10 pg/ml (McDonald 1958), 2 to 7 pg/ml (Lewis 1960) and 4.9 pg/ml (Oltjen et all. 1963). However, Repp et al. (1955) recorded levels up to 6.6 pg/ml without clinical signs being apparent. In the present paper clinical signs in three cattle were observed at levels of less than 8, 11 and 19 pg/ml which are slightly higher than the range reported for sheep. The magnitude of levels that occurred before death in sheep have been reported as 25 to 34 pg/ml in samples taken, presumably, from 30 to 90 min before death (Repp et al. 1955), in excess of 28 pg/ml in two sheep just before death (Russell, Hale and Hubbert 1962), and 10.6 pg/ml in sheep about 10 min before death (Oltjen et ccl. 1963). These values are similar to those of 19.5, 22.0 and 27.1,pg/ml taken at 15, 13 and 60 min respectively before death in the present study. The clinical signs of urea toxicity were similar to those reported by Dinning et ~2. (1948) and Davis and Roberts (1959) in cattle and by Repp et al. (1955) in sheep. V. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Mr. G. Baxter with chemical analyses and Messrs. I. A. Clark and B. J. McDonald for technical assistance. VI. REFERENCES CLARK, R., OYAERT, W., and QUIN, J. I. ( 1961). Onderstepoort J. vet. Res. 25: 73. D AVIS, G. K., and ROBERTS, H. F. (1959). Bull. Fla. agric. Exp. Stn. No. 611. D INNING, J. S., B RIGGS, H. M., G ALLUP, W. D., ORR, H. W., and B UTLER, R. (1948). Am. J. Physiol. 153: 41. E RB, R. E., and H OLTZ, E. W. (1958). J. Dairy Sci. 41: 1541. LEWIS, D. ( 1960). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 55: III. LEWIS, D., H ILL, K. J., and A NNISON, E. F. ( 1957). Biochem. J. 66: 587. M CD ONALD, I. W. (1958). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 2: 46. O LTJEN, R. R., W ALLER, G. R., N ELSON, A. B., and TILLMAN, A. D. (1963). J. Anim. Sci. 22: 36. REPP, W. W., HALE, W. H., CHENG, E. W., and BURROUGHS, W. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14: l18. R USSELL, E. L., H ALE, W. H., and HUBBERT, F. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21: 523. RYLEY, J. W. ( 196 1). Qd J. agric. Sci. 18: 409. SELIGSON, D., and SELIGSON, H. ( 1951). J. Lab. cl%. Med. 38: 324. 390