Minnesota Early Hearing Detection & Intervention Annual Report for 2012 Data

Similar documents
MINNESOTA EARLY HEARING DETECTION AND INTERVENTION (EHDI) PROGRAM. EHDI Goals, Indicators and Benchmarks

PROJECT NARRATIVE. Figure 1: Number of children who did not pass their hearing screen and subsequent results for 2011.

Appendix C NEWBORN HEARING SCREENING PROJECT

Historical Perspective. JCIH 1973 Position Statement. JCIH Goals. JCIH 1982 Position Statement

Trends across the country. Indiana Early Hearing Detection 4/13/2015

Iowa EHDI A Work in Progress. Coordinating Council for Hearing Services November 24, 2008

About North Carolina Data. Population 9,382,609 Live Births = 128,180 Children Identified with Hearing Loss = 201

Hearing loss is the most frequently occurring congenital

JFK-HCP Webinar - Partnering to Support Children with Hearing Loss - 2/27/14 1

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI): The Role of the Medical Home

Reducing Lost to Follow Up Percentages In EHDI Programs: The Role of Audiology

Progress in Standardization of Reporting and Analysis of Data from Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) Programs

Lessons Learned Through a Recent Connecticut EHDI Program - Diagnostic Audiology Center Collaboration: One Small Change at a Time

Guam Early Hearing Detection and Intervention

INPATIENT SCREENING PROTOCOL

5. Hospitals will provide the family with a copy of the Michigans Community Program: Information for Parents (MDCH /01). Copies can be ordered,

Congenital CMV (ccmv) Initiatives Across the United States: A Panel Discussion

Indiana Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI)

Using Virtual Technology to Fully Implement EHDDI (Early Hearing Detection, Diagnosis and Intervention) in Rural Settings

Kansas Successful Strategies in Reducing Loss to Follow-Up/Loss to Documentation

Executive Summary. JCIH Year 2007 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs

GUAM. Newborn Hearing At-A-Glance. Guam EHDI Progress Report. Håfa Ådai! January - December 2012

Impact of the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program on the Detection of Hearing Loss at Birth Michigan,

Developing the Medical Home Approach in EHDI. Albert Mehl, M.D. Vickie Thomson, Ph.D.

Reducing Loss to Follow-up after Failure to Pass Newborn Hearing Screening. Table of Contents

CHILDREN WITH CMV: DON T FORGET THE IMPORTANCE OF EARLY INTERVENTION. Paula Pittman, PhD Director, Utah Parent Infant Program for the Deaf

State of Kansas Department of Health and Environment. Permanent Administrative Regulations

Reduce refused screening by identifying facilities who have families who refuse 4/14 12/14 PD,CC, FOS, QIT, EPI,OS, LTFS

Michael Macione, AuD, & Cheryl DeConde Johnson, EdD. a critical link within the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) process.

RESULTS REPORTING MANUAL. Hospital Births Newborn Screening Program June 2016

Guam Early Hearing Detection and Intervention

MNSCREEN TRAINING MANUAL Hospital Births Newborn Screening Program October 2015

Infant Hearing Aid Practices and Experiences in Utah

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Tracking Research and Integration with Other Newborn Screening Programs

A PARENT S GUIDE TO DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING EARLY INTERVENTION RECOMMENDATIONS

GUIDE TO THE ECHO INITIATIVE HEARING SCREENING & DIAGNOSTIC LOG

Factors Associated with Newborn Hearing Screening Follow-up

Newborn Hearing Screening: Success and Challenges

The Status of EHDI Programs in the USA

Michael Macione, AuD; & Cheryl DeConde Johnson, EdD

A. Executive Summary:

This article shall be known, and may be cited as, the Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening, Tracking and Intervention Act.

Performance Narrative

Disclosures. Objectives 2/29/2016. Bradley Golner M.D. FAAP. AzEHDI chapter champion AAP EHDI leadership team

EHDI National EHDI Meeting

VERIFICATION FORM for DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING

EHDI: An Amazing Journey

California Newborn Hearing Screening Program: Tracking Our Babies

3. How does your state collect these results? (Check all that apply.) collecting this information.

Collaboration Between WIC and EHDI to Improve Follow-Up of Newborn Hearing Screening in Greater Cincinnati

Dr Claudine Störbeck and Selvarani Moodley (MA Audiology) The University of the Witwatersrand The Centre for Deaf Studies

COACHingto improve NHS Outcomes: Coalition of Ohio Audiologists and Childrens Hospitals

CHHA-NL POSITION PAPER. Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program (UNHSP) in Newfoundland and Labrador

Improving Loss to Follow-up Rates Diagnostic Center Guidelines for 2011

Response to the Language Equality and Acquisition for Deaf Kids (LEAD-K) Task Force Report

AR UNHS (2014) H61MC Introduction

RESPONSE TO THE LANGUAGE EQUALITY AND ACQUISITION FOR DEAF KIDS (LEAD K) TASK FORCE REPORT

Chapter 1. This chapter summarizes the. The Evolution of EHDI: From Concept to Standard of Care. Introduction. Karl R. White, PhD

Congenital Cytomegalovirus: A Pilot Study

Guidelines for Primary Care and Medical Home Providers

H 5668 SUBSTITUTE A ======== LC001286/SUB A ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Students Who are Deaf or Hard-of- Hearing in Minnesota. June 2011

I. Project Identifier Information

Congenital permanent hearing loss occurs in about 3

GUIDE TO THE ECHO INITIATIVE HEARING SCREENING & DIAGNOSTIC LOG

The Fiscal Impact of Lost to Documentation of Newborn Hearing Screening in Oklahoma s County Health Departments

screening improved loss to follow-up rates, decreased the age at hearing confirmation by 1 month, and addressed reported care barriers.

LOUISIANA MEDICAID PROGRAM ISSUED: 09/28/12 REPLACED: 02/01/12 CHAPTER 5: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SECTION 5.1: COVERED SERVICES PAGE(S) 7

Children and Youth With Special Health Needs Section ANNUAL REPORT

Reducing Loss to Follow-Up After Failure to Pass Newborn Hearing Screening New Hampshire Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program

The Guam EHDI Story. University of Guam Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research, and Service (Guam CEDDERS)

Developmental Hearing and Auditory Milestones. Presented by : Amy Packer & Marilyn Nelson

Making Connections: Early Detection Hearing and Intervention through the Medical Home Model Podcast Series

My View On Services. Karen Aguilar, MJ, Coalition Director

EHDI Newborn Hearing Screening Advisory Commitee Advisor Biographies

Newborn Genetic Testing & Surveillance System

Project Narrative MD EHDI Online Data Management

the time is now: wisconsin s journey towards improving early intervention services

Hear Now! ND EHDI Announces the release of North Dakota s Early Intervention Module. Inside this issue:

Data Management for EHDI: Helpful Friend, Not Dreaded Foe

The Evaluation & Treatment of Hearing Loss in Children & Adults 2018

The Whole Child: Hearing Screening and Identification in Children who are Deaf/Hard of Hearing. Rachel St. John, MD, NCC, NIC-A

POSITION DESCRIPTION

BC Early Hearing Program

A New Era for the Identification and Treatment of Children with Auditory Disorders

A SUPPLEMENT TO AUDIOLOGY TODAY NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2007

Wisconsin Sound Beginnings Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Annual Report 2015

REPORT OF THE COUNCIL ON MEDICAL SERVICE

A Modular Curriculum for Practice. Newborn Hearing and Public Health

Health and Wellness for all Arizonans. azdhs.gov

Map of Medicine National Library for Health

Newborn Hearing Screening Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention

NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Copyright (c) 2011 by the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law

Research findings Current trends in early intervention How can you make a difference?

Chapter 4 : Newborn Screening

How Does Your EHDI Intervention System Measure Up? States Experiences Using the JCIH EHDI System Self-Assessment

Factors That Influence Parental Follow-Up After Newborn Hearing Screening in Colorado

Teleaudiology: Providing Hearing Assessments to Infants and Children Living in Remote and Rural Communities.

to the child and the family, based on the child's and family's abilities and needs. The IFSP needs to address the communication needs of the child and

Transcription:

Minnesota Early Hearing Detection & Intervention Annual Report for 2012 Data

Table Of Contents Introduction Minnesota Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program 1 Minnesota Newborn Hearing Screening Advisory Committee 2 1 All newborns will be screened for hearing loss Indicator 1.1: Percent of infants screened 3 Indicator 1.2: Percent of infants >1800 grams screened before 1 month of age 4 Indicator 1.3: Percent of infants <1800 grams screened before 4 months of age 5 Indicator 1.4: Percent of infants that did not pass initial screening 6 2 All infants who do not pass hearing screening will have a diagnostic audiology evaluation before 3 months of age Indicator 2.1: Percent of infants >1800 grams given a REFER on initial hearing 7 screening that were rescreened by 1 month of age Indicator 2.2: Percent of infants >1800 grams who have a REFER on rescreen and 8 receive an audiology evaluation by 3 months of age Indicator 2.3: Percent of infants with a REFER who were lost to follow-up 9 Indicator 2.4: Percent of infants >1800 grams with a REFER who were lost to 10 follow-up Indicator 2.5: Percent of infants <1800 grams with a REFER who were lost to 11 follow-up Indicator 2.6: Percent of all infants with a REFER who were lost to documentation 12 Indicator 2.7: Percent of infants >1800 grams with a REFER who were lost to 13 documentation Indicator 2.8: Percent of infants <1800 grams with a REFER who were lost to 14 documentation 3 All infants with hearing loss will receive appropriate early intervention services before 6 months of age Indicator 3.1: Percent of infants with hearing loss who received an ENT/ORL evaluation by 4 months of age Indicator 3.2: Percent of infants with hearing loss who received a genetics evaluation by 1 year of age Indicator 3.3: Percent of infants with hearing loss who received a pediatric ophthalmology evaluation by 6 months of age Indicator 3.4: Percent of infants fitted with personal amplification within 1 month of diagnosis 15 16 17 18

Indicator 3.5: Percent of infants/children ages 0-3 years with permanent confirmed hearing loss that enrolled in Part C Help Me Grow Indicator 3.6: Percent of infants/children with permanent confirmed hearing loss who enrolled in Part C Help Me Grow before 6 months of age Indicator 3.7: Percent of infants/children ages 0-3 years with permanent confirmed hearing loss that enrolled in any early intervention program Indicator 3.8: Percent of infants/children with permanent confirmed hearing loss who enrolled in any early intervention program before 6 months of age Indicator 3.9: Percent of infants/children ages 0-3 years with permanent confirmed hearing loss that enrolled in any early intervention program within 2 months of confirmation of hearing loss Indicator 3.10: Percent of infants/children ages 0-3 years with permanent confirmed hearing loss who received direct family-to-family support within 1 month of confirmation of hearing loss 4 All infants and children with late onset, progressive, or acquired hearing loss will be identified at the earliest possible time Indicator 4.1: Percent of infants and children identified with late onset, progressive, or acquired hearing loss 5 All infants with hearing loss will have a medical home as defined by the American Academy of Pediatrics Indicator 5.1: Percent of infants that have a primary care provider at the time of diagnosis 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 6 Minnesota will have a complete EHDI tracking and surveillance system that will minimize loss to follow-up Indicator 6.1: Documentation of percent of hearing screening results matched with 27 vital records Indicator 6.2: Percent of audiology reports received by MDH within 10 days of 28 appointment Indicator 6.3: Percent of infants who had incomplete/unreported hearing screening 29 Indicator 6.4: Percent of requested follow-up reports received from audiologists 30 caring for infants/children with permanent confirmed hearing loss Indicator 6.5: Percent of requested follow-up reports received from primary care 31 providers caring for infants/children with permanent confirmed hearing loss 7 Minnesota will have a comprehensive system that monitors and evaluates the progress towards the EHDI goals and objectives Indicator 7.1: Minnesota s plan to develop and implement this system 32 Glossary 33 MDH Contact Information 34

Minnesota Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program The Minnesota Newborn Screening Program screens all infants born in the state for a variety of disorders. In 2007, Minnesota Statute section 144.966 mandated the reporting of newborn hearing screening results and added hearing loss to the panel of more than 50 disorders. This legislation required all hospitals to establish an Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) program. The EHDI program shall: Provide to the newborn s parent(s) information concerning the nature of the screening procedure, applicable costs of the screening procedure, the potential risks and effects of hearing loss, and the benefits of early detection and intervention in advance of any hearing screening testing Comply with the same parental consent requirements as is used for the other newborn screening program Develop policies and procedures for screening and rescreening based on the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) recommendations Provide appropriate training and monitoring of individuals responsible for performing hearing screening tests as recommended by MDH Tes the newborn s hearing prior to discharge, or, if the newborn is expected to remain in the hospital for a prolonged period, testing shall be performed prior to three months of age or when medically feasible Develop and implement procedures for documenting the results of all hearing screening tests Inform the newborn s parent(s), primary care physician, and MDH personnel the results of the hearing screening test or rescreening if conducted, or if the infant was not successfully tested, according to MDH recommendations. The hospital that discharges the newborn home is responsible for the screening 1

This same legislation created the Newborn Hearing Screening Advisory Committee. The committee is intended to function in an advisory capacity to the MDH program managers in Newborn Screening and the Children and Youth with Special Health Needs (CYSHN) subject areas and, ultimately, to the Commissioner of Health. The members of the Newborn Hearing Screening Advisory Committee are responsible for: Developing protocols and timelines for screening, rescreening, and diagnostic audiological assessment and early medical, audiological, and educational intervention services for children who are deaf or hard-of-hearing Designing protocols for tracking children from birth through age three that may have passed newborn screening but are at risk for delayed or late onset of permanent hearing loss Designing a technical assistance program to support facilities implementing the screening program and facilities conducting rescreening and diagnostic audiological assessment Designing implementation and evaluation of a system of follow-up and tracking Evaluating program outcomes to increase effectiveness and efficiency and ensure culturally appropriate services for children with a confirmed hearing loss and their families The Newborn Hearing Screening Advisory Committee has established the following EHDI goals, indicators, and benchmarks (Approved May 2010, August 2010, and November 2010). This information is based on the national goals, program objectives, and performance measures for the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Tracking and Surveillance System from the Center for Disease Control (CDC). 2

1. All newborns will be screened for hearing loss. Indicator 1.1 Percent of infants screened for hearing loss. Benchmark 98.1% 98.4% 98.9% 99.4% 100% 100% Actual 98.4% 98.5% 99.1% (from 2009) = 97.9% All infants reported as screened for hearing loss All infants born in Minnesota (MN) minus those that are deceased and those whose parent(s) declined hearing screening 3

1. All newborns will be screened for hearing loss. Indicator 1.2 Percent of infants screened for hearing loss before 1 month of age. *this indicator excludes infants <1800 grams Benchmark 98.0% 98.3% 98.8% 99.3% 100% 100% Actual 97.4% 97.3% 97.3% (from 2009) = 97.8% All infants reported as screened for hearing loss before 30 days of age minus babies <1800 grams All infants born in MN minus babies <1800 grams, those that are deceased, and those whose parent(s) declined hearing screening 4

1. All newborns will be screened for hearing loss. Indicator 1.3 Percent of infants <1800 grams screened for hearing loss before 4 months of age. Benchmark 81.7% 82.0% 86.0% 90.0% 95.0% 100% Actual 87.9% 97.1% 91.5% (from 2009) = 81.5% All infants <1800 grams reported as screened for hearing loss before 4 months of age All infants born in MN <1800 grams minus those that are deceased and those whose parent(s) declined hearing screening 5

1. All newborns will be screened for hearing loss. Indicator 1.4 Percent of infants that did not pass initial hearing screening (given a REFER ). National (1-4%) Benchmark 5.9% 5.6% 5.1% 4.6% 4.1% 3.6% Actual 5.9% 5.5% 4.7% (from 2009) = 6.1% All infants that did not pass inital hearing screening in one or both ears that were reported as REFER All infants reported as screened for hearing loss 6

2. All infants who do not pass hearing screening will have a diagnostic audiologic evaluation before 3 months of age. Indicator 2.1 Percent of infants given a REFER on initial hearing screening that were rescreened within 1 month of age. *this indicator excludes infants <1800 grams Benchmark 60.0% 65.0% 74.0% 83.0% 92.0% 100% Actual 55.6% 61.1% 61.8% (from 2009) = 56.2% Infants with a REFER result on initial hearing screening that were rescreened (PASS or REFER result) within 1 month of age All infants >1800 grams with a REFER result on initial hearing screening with a rescreen result 7

2. All infants who do not pass hearing screening will have a diagnostic audiologic evaluation before 3 months of age. Indicator 2.2 Percent of infants who have a REFER on hearing rescreen and who received a comprehensive audiological evaluation by 3 months of age. *this indicator excludes infants <1800 grams Benchmark 28.0% 36.0% 52.0% 68.0% 84.0% 100% Actual 23.4% 23.0% 31.7% (from 2009) = 20.1% Infants with a REFER result on hearing rescreen and a documented audiological evaluation within 3 months of age All infants >1800 grams with REFER results on hearing rescreen 8

2. All infants who do not pass hearing screening will have a diagnostic audiologic evaluation before 3 months of age. Indicator 2.3 Percent of all infants with a REFER on hearing screening who were lost to follow-up. Benchmark 13.0% 12.0% 8.5% 5.0% 1.5% 0% Actual 10.8% 6.6% 5.7% (from 2009) = 13.9% All infants in closed status assigned codes NBNOAUDIO, NBNOSHOW, and NBNORESC All infants reported as REFER *See glossary for definition of codes 9

2. All infants who do not pass hearing screening will have a diagnostic audiologic evaluation before 3 months of age. Indicator 2.4 Percent of infants with a REFER on hearing screening who were lost to follow-up. *this indicator is for infants >1800 grams Benchmark 13.0% 10.4% 7.8% 5.2% 2.6% 0% Actual 13.9% 8.4% 5.6% (from 2009) = 13.9% Infants >1800 grams in closed status assigned codes NBNOAUDIO, NBNOSHOW, and NBNORESC Infants >1800 grams reported as REFER *See glossary for definition of codes 10

2. All infants who do not pass hearing screening will have a diagnostic audiologic evaluation before 3 months of age. Indicator 2.5 Percent of infants with a REFER on hearing screening who were lost to follow-up. *this indicator is for infants <1800 grams Benchmark 16.0% 12.8% 9.6% 6.4% 3.2% 0% Actual 16.6% 6.3% 4.7% (from 2009) = 16.6% All infants <1800 grams in closed status assigned codes NBNOAUDIO, NBNOSHOW, and NBNORESC Infants <1800 grams reported as REFER *See glossary for definition of codes 11

2. All infants who do not pass hearing screening will have a diagnostic audiologic evaluation before 3 months of age. Indicator 2.6 Percent of all infants with a REFER on hearing screening who were lost to documentation. Benchmark 5.6% 5.0% 3.5% 2.0% 1.0% 0% Actual 3.4% 3.4% 2.4% (from 2009) = 6.2% All infants in closed status assigned codes PCPUN, PCPNOCO, and NBDXPRO All infants reported as REFER *See glossary for definition of codes 12

2. All infants who do not pass hearing screening will have a diagnostic audiologic evaluation before 3 months of age. Indicator 2.7 Percent of infants with a REFER on hearing screening who were lost to documentation. *this indicator is for infants >1800 grams Benchmark 5.0% 3.8% 2.6% 1.4% 0.5% 0% Actual 6.2% 3.0% 1.9% (from 2009) = 6.2% Infants >1800 grams in closed status assigned codes PCPUN, PCPNOCO, and NBDXPRO Infants >1800 grams reported as REFER *See glossary for definition of codes 13

2. All infants who do not pass hearing screening will have a diagnostic audiologic evaluation before 3 months of age. Indicator 2.8 Percent of infants with a REFER on hearing screening who were lost to documentation. *this indicator is for infants <1800 grams Benchmark 6.1% 4.6% 4.0% 3.1% 1.6% 0% Actual 7.6% 3.2% 3.8% (from 2009) = 7.6% Infants <1800 grams in closed status assigned codes PCPUN, PCPNOCO, and NBDXPRO Infants <1800 grams reported as REFER *See glossary for definition of codes 14

3. All infants with hearing loss will receive appropriate early intervention services before 6 months of age (medical, audiologic, and early intervention). Indicator 3.1 Percent of infants with hearing loss who received an Ear, Nose & Throat (ENT) and/or Otolaryngology (ORL) evaluation by 4 months of age. Benchmark 40.2% 46.0% 62.0% 74.0% 86.0% 100% Actual 44.0% 48.7% * (from 2009) = 35.6% *Data not available at time of publishing All infants with permanent confirmed hearing loss (PCHL) that have been evaluated by ENT/ORL by 4 months of age All infants reported with a congenital PCHL minus those infants whose parent(s) declined ENT/ORL evaluation 15

3. All infants with hearing loss will receive appropriate early intervention services before 6 months of age (medical, audiologic, and early intervention). Indicator 3.2 Percent of infants with hearing loss who received a genetics evaluation by 1 year of age. Benchmark 21.8% 30.0% 45.0% 60.0% 75% 100% Actual 16.0% 27.4% * (from 2009) = 13.6% *Data not available at time of publishing All infants with PCHL that have received a genetics evaluation by 1 year of age All infants reported with a congenital PCHL minus those infants whose parent(s) declined genetics evaluation 16

3. All infants with hearing loss will receive appropriate early intervention services before 6 months of age (medical, audiologic, and early intervention). Indicator 3.3 Percent of infants with hearing loss who received a pediatric ophthalmology evaluation by 6 months of age. Benchmark 22.0% 30.0% 45.0% 60.0% 75.0% 100% Actual 10.0% 11.8% * (from 2009) = 15.3% *Data not available at time of publishing All infants with PCHL that have received a pediatric ophthalmology evaluation by 6 months of age All infants reported with a congenital PCHL minus those infants whose parent(s) declined ophthalmology evaluation 17

3. All infants with hearing loss will receive appropriate early intervention services before 6 months of age (medical, audiologic, and early intervention). Indicator 3.4 Percent of infants fitted with personal amplification within 1 month of PCHL diagnosis. Benchmark 22.0% 30.0% 45.0% 60.0% 75.0% 100% Actual 44.0% 23.7% 33.1% (from 2009) = 15.3% All infants with PCHL that have had amplification fitted within 1 month of diagnosis All infants that have been offered amplification by an audiologist and have not declined amplification 18

3. All infants with hearing loss will receive appropriate early intervention services before 6 months of age (medical, audiologic, and early intervention). Indicator 3.5 Percent of infants/children ages 0-3 years with a reported PCHL (congenital or late onset) who were reported to be enrolled in Part C Help Me Grow. Benchmark 42.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100% Actual 67.0% 67.3% 82.3% (from 2009) = 22.0% All infants/children ages 0-3 years with a reported congenital or late onset PCHL who were eligible for, and enrolled in, Part C Help Me Grow Early Intervention services All infants/children ages 0-3 years with a reported congenital or late onset PCHL minus those whose parent(s) declined Part C Help Me Grow Early Intervention services 19

3. All infants with hearing loss will receive appropriate early intervention services before 6 months of age (medical, audiologic, and early intervention). Indicator 3.6 Percent of infants with a reported congenital PCHL and reported as enrolled in Part C Help Me Grow services, who were enrolled before 6 months of age. Benchmark 71.0% 75.0% 80.0% 85.0% 90.0% 100% Actual 53.0% 70.3% 62.0% (from 2009) = 69.0% All infants with a reported congenital PCHL who were reported enrolled in Part C/Help Me Grow services before 6 months of age All infants with a reported congenital PCHL identified through hearing screening who were reported as enrolled in Part C Help Me Grow 20

3. All infants with hearing loss will receive appropriate early intervention services before 6 months of age (medical, audiologic, and early intervention). Indicator 3.7 Percent of infants/children ages 0-3 years with a reported PCHL (congenital or late onset) who were reported as enrolled in any early intervention program (Part C Help Me Grow or private services). Benchmark 42.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100% Actual 70.0% 67.3% 82.3% (from 2009) = 23.0% All infants/children ages 0-3 years with a reported congenital or late onset PCHL who were enrolled in Part C Help Me Grow OR private early intervention services All infants/children ages 0-3 years with a reported congenital or late onset PCHL minus those whose parent(s) declined early intervention services 21

3. All infants with hearing loss will receive appropriate early intervention services before 6 months of age (medical, audiologic, and early intervention). Indicator 3.8 Percent of infants with a reported congenital PCHL and reported as enrolled in any early intervention services, who were enrolled before 6 months of age (Part C Help Me Grow or private services). Benchmark 75.0% 80.0% 85.0% 90.0% 95.0% 100% Actual 53.0% 70.3% 62.0% (from 2009) = 70.0% All infants with a reported congenital PCHL who were enrolled in either Part C/Help Me Grow services OR private early intervention services before 6 months of age All infants with a reported congenital PCHL identified through hearing screening who were reported as enrolled in any early intervention program 22

3. All infants with hearing loss will receive appropriate early intervention services before 6 months of age (medical, audiologic, and early intervention). Indicator 3.9 Percent of infants/children ages 0-3 years with a reported PCHL (congenital or late onset) who were reported enrolled in any early intervention program (Part C Help Me Grow or private services) within 2 months of confirmation of hearing loss. Benchmark 36.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100% Actual 37.0% 54.2% 52.9% (from 2009) = 11.0% All infants/children ages 0-3 years with a reported congenital or late onset PCHL who were enrolled in either Part C Help Me Grow OR private early intervention services within 2 months of confirmation of hearing loss All infants/children ages 0-3 years with a reported congenital or late onset PCHL who were reported as enrolled in any early intervention program 23

3. All infants with hearing loss will receive appropriate early intervention services before 6 months of age (medical, audiologic, and early intervention). Indicator 3.10 Percent of families of infants/children ages 0-3 years with reported PCHL (congenital or late onset) who received direct family-to-family support (i.e. phone call, personal contact) within 1 month of confirmation of their child s hearing loss. Benchmark 32.0% 35.0% 55.0% 70.0% 85.0% 100% Actual 24.0% 22.0% 18.5% (from 2009) = 29.0% All infants/children ages 0-3 years with a reported congenital or late onset PCHL whose families were directly contacted by MN Hands and Voices (family-to-family support organization) within 1 month of confirmation of hearing loss All infants/young children ages 0-3 years with a reported congenital or late onset PCHL minus those whose parent(s) declined family-to-family support contact 24

4. All infants and children with late onset, progressive, or acquired hearing loss will be identified at the earliest possible time. Indicator 4.1 Percent of infants and children identified with late onset, progressive, or acquired hearing loss. *there are no benchmarks associated with this target Benchmark - - - - - - Actual 9.0% 6.6% 13.6% (from 2009) = 5.3% All infants/children with an initial PASS hearing screen result but have CONFIRMED HEARING LOSS All infants and children reported as PCHL reported within 1 year and born after 9/1/2007 (implementation of mandate) 25

5. All infants with hearing loss will have a medical home as defined by the american academy of pediatrics. Indicator 5.1 Percent of infants/children that have a primary care provider at the time of PCHL diagnosis. Benchmark 97.2% 97.5% 98.0% 99.0% 99.5% 100% Actual 99.0% 98.9% 98.6% (from 2009) = 96.9% All infants/children with PCHL and primary care provider has been confirmed during initial confirmation call-out All infants/children reported with PCHL 26

6. Minnesota will have a complete EHDI tracking and surveillance system that will minimize loss to follow-up. Indicator 6.1 Documentation of percent of hearing screening results matched with vital records. Benchmark 99.6% 99.7% 99.8% 99.9% 100% 100% Actual 99.4% 99.4% 99.8% (from 2009) = 99.5% All infants with hearing screening results that were matched with vital records All infants born in MN minus those infants whose parent(s) declined hearing screening 27

6. Minnesota will have a complete EHDI tracking and surveillance system that will minimize loss to follow-up. Indicator 6.2 Percent of audiology reports received by MDH within 10 days of appointment. Benchmark 78.0% 80.0% 85.0% 90.0% 95.0% 100% Actual 83.2% 84.4% 83.2% (from 2009) = 76.4% All audiology reports received by MDH <10 days from appointment All audiology reports received by MDH

6. Minnesota will have a complete EHDI tracking and surveillance system that will minimize loss to follow-up. Indicator 6.3 Percent of infants who had incomplete or unreported hearing screening. Benchmark 2.3% 2.1% 1.6% 1.1% 0.6% 0% Actual 2.1% 1.4% 1.2% (from 2009) = 2.6% All infants with incomplete or unreported hearing screens minus those that are deceased and those whose parent(s) declined hearing screening All infants born in MN minus those that are deceased and those whose parent(s) declined hearing screening

6. Minnesota will have a complete EHDI tracking and surveillance system that will minimize loss to follow-up. Indicator 6.4 Percent of requested follow-up reports received from audiologists identified as caring for infants/children with PCHL. Benchmark 65.0% 70.0% 75.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100% Actual 75.0% 95.4% 90.4% (from 2009) = 61.5% Number of requested follow-up reports submitted by audiologists identified as caring for an infant/child with PCHL Total number of follow-up reports/fax-back information requested from audiologists identified as caring for infant/child withpchl 30

6. Minnesota will have a complete EHDI tracking and surveillance system that will minimize loss to follow-up. Indicator 6.5 Percent of requested follow-up reports received from primary care providers identified as caring for infants/children with PCHL. Benchmark 75.0% 80.0% 85.0% 90.0% 95.0% 100% Actual 39.0% 57.2% 91.8% (from 2009) = 71.1% Number of requested reports submitted by primary care providers identified as caring for an infant/child with PCHL Total number of follow-up reports/fax-back information requested from primary care providers identified as caring for infant/child with PCHL 31

7. Minnesota will have a comprehensive system that monitors and evaluates the progress towards the EHDI goals and objectives. Indicator 7.1 Minnesota state agencies (led by MN Departments of Education and Health) will develop and implement a system to determine and communicate the percent of infants/ children ages 0-3 with a reported PCHL (congenital or late onset) who achieve communication development commensurate with their cognitive abilities at 3 years of age. Benchmark Targets: By December 31, 2011: A statewide system will be developed to collect data to be used for determining and communicating the number and percent of infants and children who were reported to MDH as having PCHL (congenital or late onset) who achieve communication development that is commensurate with their cognitive abilities at 3 years of age. 32

Glossary CDC EHDI ENT/ORL MDH MN NBDXPRO Center for Disease Control Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Ear, Nose & Throat/Otolaryngology Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Child has been seen by audiology but complete diagnostic data has not been completed and/or reported to Minnesota Department of Health and child has had >4 appointments and/or is >6 months. Case has been closed for follow-up by Minnesota Department of Health. NBNOAUDIO NBNORESC NBNOSHOW PCHL PCPNOCO PCPUN Primary care provider recommended follow-up with audiology but appointment never made and/or results not reported to Minnesota Department of Health. Case has been closed for follow-up by Minnesota Department of Health. Primary care provider has decided to monitor hearing and not refer for rescreen and/or diagnostic audiology. Case has been closed for follow-up by Minnesota Department of Health. Family has not shown or has canceled multiple appointments with audiology for follow-up. Case has been closed for follow-up by Minnesota Department of Health. Permanent Confirmed Hearing Loss Primary care provider is unknown to Minnesota Department of Health however Minnesota Department of Health has been unable to contact for follow-up. Case has been closed for follow-up by Minnesota Department of Health. Primary care provider is unknown to Minnesota Department of Health. Case has been closed for follow-up by Minnesota Department of Health 33

Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Program http://www.health.state.mn.us/newbornscreening/ health.newbornscreening@state.mn.us 651-201-5466 or 800-664-7772 Program Manager Mark McCann 651-201-5450 Short Term Follow-up Supervisor Amy Gaviglio 651-201-5451 Audiologists Kirsten Coverstone 651-201-5223 Melanie Wege 320-223-7309 Children and Youth with Special Health Needs http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fh/mcshn/index.htm health.cyshn@state.mn.us 651-201-3650 or 800-728-5420 Program Manager Barbara Dalbec 651-201-3758 Newborn Follow-up Supervisor Tony Steyermark 651-201-5098 Newborn Follow-up Staff Nicole Brown 651-201-3737 Yaoli Li 651-201-3750 34