Emphysema Endoscopic lung volume reduction JM VERGNON M.D, PhD. PhD. Chief, department of chest diseases and thoracic oncology Genève 2010 INSERM IFR 143 Physiological concepts EMPHYSEMA Slide of Ch H Marquette elastic recoil 1.Abnormal size increase of distal alveolar spaces starting in terminal bronchioles. 2.Lung parenchyma destruction 3.No fibrosis Bronchial obstruction Airflow limitation Thoracic distension Dyspnea Muscular activity reduction Muscular deconditionning 1
The surgical approach Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS): tested in the NETT study (National Emphysema Treatment Trial) Functional benefit: quality of life exercise capacity survival Heterogeneous emphysema Upper lobes AND Limited exercise capacity Place for minimal invasive techniques? techniques where we can go back? The medical approach Insert bronchus blockers One-way valves: Zephyr valves Spiration valves Spigots Stick the lobe: Aeris system Create new bronchi:bronchial fenestration Bronchus system Other systems: PneumoRx 2
Theoretical action Start this way. Reduction of volume targeted lobe improves ventilation improves exercise and QOL Mechanical benefit Clinical benefit Zephyr R valves Left upper lobe trifurcation before treatment Left upper lobe trifurcation after treatment One-way valve Shape-memory Nitinol structure to fix the valve Opening one-way valve during expiration time Closed valve during inspiration time to prevent lobe inflation Valve insertion : 3
Patient with 4 valves in left upper lobe (Lingula bronchus included) International Endobronchial Valve for Emphysema PalliatioN Trial (VENT) Type of study Clinical randomized and prospective multi-centric study. Population 270 patients Inclusion centers: 25 Randomization ratio: 2/1 (Treatment/) Selection Heterogeneous emphysema assessed on strict CT scan criteria. Main end-points: 6 months after inclusion FEV1 improvement 6 mn walking test improvement. Main end points: Results at 6 months Treatment n = 220 Mean ± SD n = 101 Mean ± SD p value % Change in FEV 1 5.8 ± 27.7% -0.6 ± 27.3% 0.0047 % Change in 6MWT 1.7 ± 30.3% -4.0 ± 28.1% 0.0073 Secondary end points: Treatment n = 220 Mean ± SD n = 101 Mean ± SD p value SGRQ -2.6 ± 13.0 0.4 ± 10.5 0.0186 Max Workload (w) 0.75 ± 15.0-4.4 ± 11.5 0.0003 mmrc -0.1 ± 1.0 0.3 ± 0.8 0.0024 Supplemental O2 (l/day) 9.7 ± 953.4 116.2 ± 736.1 0.0392 4
Main end points at 12 months VEMS % Change Δ = 11.7% Univariate p = 0.0001 Longitudinal, multivariate p < 0.0001* 6MWT % Change Δ = 3.3% Univariate p = 0.1788 Longitudinal, multivariate p = 0.0034* Treatment (n=101) (n=220) (n=101) Treatment (n=220) *By interaction with heterogeneity Safety results: Main complications at 6 and 12 months compared to controls. Major Complication Composite (MCC) Primary Safety Endpoint 6 months n=87 EBV n=214 p value Additional Safety Analysis 12 months (cumulative) n=87 EBV n=214 p value 1.2% 6.1% 0.0748 4.6% 10.4% 0.1724 Death 0.0% 2.8% 0.1867 3.5% 3.7% 1.0000 Empyema 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Massive Hemoptysis 0.0% 0.5% 1.0000 0.0% 0.5% 1.0000 Distal Pneumonia NA 1.4% NA 4.2% Pneumothorax/ air leak > 7 days Resp. Failure 24 hours vent 1.2% 1.4% 1.0000 1.2% 1.9% 1.0000 1.2% 1.9% 1.0000 2.3% 2.8% 1.0000 Modified Intention to Treat: Randomized patients receiving study-directed treatment and had any follow-up Frequent events in valve group Rate Difference (RateEBV - Rate) 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% 26.6% 12.7% 8.1% 4.6% Hemoptysis (not Massive) Rate Difference 21.0% 6.3% 5.1% 2.6% COPD Exacerbation Rate Difference 9.8% 2.6% 0.9% 1.4% Non Cardiac Chest Pain Rate Difference 7.3% -0.5% 1.4% -0.1% Increased Shortness of Breath Rate Difference 5.0% 0.5% 0.9% 0.5% Hypoxemia Rate Difference Day 0-97 Day 98-194 Day 195-284 Day 285-386 5
Target lobe volume change *Subjects with HRCT available Fissure integrity HR CT scan can control fissure integrity Fissure integrity is highly correlated with the percentage of lung volume reduction and with the FEV1 improvement. Target lung volume reduction (TLAS) and fissure integrity -60% -50% -40% -17% TLAS TLC -30% -347 ml n = 29-20% -55% -941 ml n = 34-15% -267 ml n = 55-10% 0% Complete Fissures Incomplete Fissures -6% -111 ml n = 46 Complete Lobar Exclusion Incomplete Lobar Exclusion 6
Valve group: FEV1 6-month change FEV1 change according to heterogeneous emphysema score % Change @ 6 mo Δ = 12.2% p = 0.0001 % Change @ 12 mo Δ = 19.0% p = 0.0001 Treatment Treatment (n=52) (n=115) (n=52) (n=115) 5.8% 10.8% 6 mn walking test change according to heterogeneous emphysema score % Change @ 6 mo Δ = 12.1% p = 0.0045 % Change @ 12 mo Δ = 10.7% p = 0.0131 (n=52) Treatment Treatment (n=115) (n=52) (n=115) 1.7 % 3.9 % 7
Technical point of view: bronchial closure failure SPIRATION valve Umbrella Polyurethane membrane Nitinol armature Efficacy study on 98 patients (659 valves) QOL improvement (SGRQ) without FEV1 change Goal: better distribution of airflows in healthier lung parts. Springmeyer SC,Boliger CT,Waddel TK et al. Thorac surg clin.2009;19:247-253. Valve insertion 8
Endobronchial blockers Silicone Spigots of Watanabee Tested in broncho-pleural fistulas Limited experience in emphysema Toma et al Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165(suppl), Watanabe Y. LVRS with WBA. Presented at: World Congress of Bronchology, June 2002, Boston Silicone Spigots NOVATECH To stick the lobes Obstruction of emphysematous lobes with glue: Endobronchial injection through a flexible bronchoscope of polymers (fibrin hydro-gel and thrombin, bi-component system) Sheep trial :atelectasis foci and fibrosis Human trial (Aeris study) 50 patients: positive results on FEV1, FVC, RV/TLC, 12 weeks after treatment with an acceptable tolerance. Ingenito EP et al Bronchoscopic volume reduction: a safe and effective alternative to surgical therapy for emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164,295-301 Ingenito, EP, Berger, RL, Henderson, AC, et al Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using tissue engineering principles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167,771-778 CrinerGJ,Pinto-Plata V,Strange C t al. Biologic lung volume reduction in advanced upper lobe emphysema.phase 2 results. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009;179,791-798 9
Bronchial fenestration (Bronchus system) To improve expiration dynamic hyper-inflation Lausberg, HF, Chino, K, Patterson, GA, et al Bronchial fenestration improves expiratory flow in emphysematous human lungs. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75,393-397 EASE trial «in progress» Lung retraction (PneumoRx system) Back home messages Surgery : selected indications on heterogeneous upper lobe emphysema. One-way valves useful on more and more selected patients : heterogeneous emphysema, fissure analysis, collateral ventilation analysis Emphasys group fails but the ZephyrR valves distribution starts again with a new group PulmonX. Collateral ventilation analysis is now proposed to a better assessment. Biological blockers could have a fruitful future. In homogeneous emphysema: fenestration or lung retraction?. Studies should be completed. 10
Thanks for your attention 11