Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in 8040 Women Compared with Men with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Edoxaban vs Warfarin for an Average 2.

Similar documents
New Insights from the Effective

Effective anticoagulation with factor xa next GEneration in Atrial Fibrillation TIMI 48. Primary Results

Effective anticoagulation with factor xa next GEneration in Atrial Fibrillation TIMI 48. Primary Results

Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD and Keith AA Fox, MB ChB

NOAs for stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: potential advantages in the elderly patients. Giancarlo Agnelli

Engage AF-TIMI 48. Edoxaban in AF: What can we expect? Cardiology Update John Camm. St. George s University of London United Kingdom

Newer Anti-Anginal Agents and Anticoagulants

Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin

Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation

Is There a Role For Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamics Guided Dosing For Novel Anticoagulants? Christopher Granger

Scoring Systems in AF 8/10/2016. Strategies in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Strokes. Overview

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Anticoagulation: Novel Agents

AF in Asian: which NOAC to choose for particular patient and at what dose? DEJIA HUANG West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

NOACs Update PD Dr. Jan Steffel Leitender Arzt, Klinik für Kardiologie Co-Leiter Rhythmologie Universitätsspital Zürich

Stepheny Sumrall, FNP, AGACNP Cardiovascular Clinic of Hattiesburg

Thrombosis and Thromboembolsim October Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Risk Stratification and Choice of Antithrombotic Therapy

Apixaban versus Heparin/Vitamin K Antagonist in Anticoagulation-naïve Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Scheduled for Cardioversion: The EMANATE Trial

NUOVI ANTICOAGULANTI NELL ANZIANO: indicazioni e controindicazioni. Mario Cavazza Medicina d Urgenza Pronto Soccorso AOU di Bologna

NOAC trials for AF: A review

What evidence is there that variable clinical responses to PK parameters exist for NOACs? What conclusions can we draw from these data?

controversies in anticoagulation: optimizing outcome for atrial fibrillation

6 th ACC-SHA Joint Meeting Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Study design: multicenter, randomized, open-label trial following a PROBE design

Anticoagulation with Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and advances in peri-procedural interruption of anticoagulation-- Bridging

Old and New Anticoagulants For Stroke Prevention Benefits and Risks

Relationship between Center Time in Therapeutic Range and Comparative Treatment Effect of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin: Results from the ROCKET AF Trial

Show Me the Outcomes!

Disclosure. Financial disclosure: National Advisory Board & Research Grant from Boehringer-Ingelheim

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

Saudi Arabia February Pr Michel KOMAJDA. Université Pierre et Marie Curie Hospital Pitié Salpétrière

Weighing the risk of stroke vs the risk of bleeding: Which AF patients should be anticoagulated?

After acute coronary syndromes patients continue to have recurrent ischemic events despite revascularization and dual antiplatelet therapy

New options in Stroke Prevention in AF Paul Dorian University of Toronto St Michael s Hospital

Joshua D. Lenchus, DO, RPh, FACP, SFHM Associate Professor of Medicine and Anesthesiology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

PCI in Patients with AF Optimizing Oral Anticoagulation Regimen

Daiichi Sankyo s Once-Daily Lixiana

Anti-thromboticthrombotic drugs

Clinical and Economic Value of Rivaroxaban in Coronary Artery Disease

RETROSPECTIVE CLAIMS DATABASE STUDIES OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS (DOACS) FOR STROKE PREVENTION IN NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

A Patient Unsuitable for VKA Treatment

Utilizing Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation Related Stroke Prevention

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2016 Montreal, QC

Stable CAD, Elective Stenting and AFib

FOURIER STUDY GREYLOCK PRESS: CTS PRODUCT SAMPLE - FOURIER YES. Did the study achieve its main objective?

Anticoagulant therapy, coumadines or direct antithrombins

CADTH CANADIAN DRUG EXPERT COMMITTEE FINAL RECOMMENDATION

Summary of Results for Laypersons

Lessons from recent antithrombotic studies and trials in atrial fibrillation

Atrial Fibrillation: Risk Stratification and Treatment New Cardiovascular Horizons St. Louis September 19, 2015

Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation An Asian Perspective. Dr Yap Lok Bin Cardiologist

Novel Anticoagulants : Bleeding and Bridging

An international, double-blind, phase III randomized trial. Main Results

Stroke prevention, Clinical trials

Practical Considerations for Using Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Defining Sub-Clinical Atrial Fibrillation and its management

Access to treatment and disease burden

Dabigatran Evidence in Real Practice

Oral Anticoagulation Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

MODULE 1: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Benjamin Bell, MD, FRCPC

On behalf of the RE-CIRCUIT Investigators. March 19, :45 am 10:55 am. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants An Update

Stroke Prevention in AF: How will it change in the next 5 years? Jeff Healey MD, MSc, FHRS Population Health Research Institute McMaster University

Secondary Preven-on of Thromboembolic Stroke: Clinical Data and Recommenda-ons from the ESC Atrial Fibrilla-on Guideline Update 2012

Disclosure. Objectives. New Anticoagulants 6/5/2014 GHASSAN HADDAD M.D FHM. South Miami hospital Director of the Anticoagulation clinic.

Clinical issues which drug for which patient

Fibrillazione Atriale Non Valvolare: Come Orientare La Scelta Dei Nuovi Anticoagulanti Orali

Clinical Study Synopsis

NAVIGATING THROMBOSIS AND BLEEDING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND CORONARY STENTING

Afib, Stroke, and DOAC. Albert Luo, MD. Cardiology Lindsey Frischmann, DO. Neurology Xiao Cai, MD. HBS

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 23 September 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta355

Terms and Conditions. VISA Global Customer Assistance Services

Edoxaban: The newest NOAC option for stroke prevention in AF

ANTI-THROMBOTIC THERAPY in NON-VALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

EBBINGHAUS: - A Cognitive Study of Patients Enrolled in the FOURIER Trial

Edoxaban. Direct Xa inhibitor Direct thrombin inhibitor Direct Xa inhibitor Direct Xa inhibitor

On behalf of the RE-CIRCUIT Investigators. March 19, :45 am 10:55 am. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Anticoagulation Therapy in LTC

D E A R. W Aspirin. AF New Anticoagulants: Todays Aims

Individual Therapeutic Selection Of Anti-coagulants And Periprocedural. Miguel Valderrábano, MD

DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS

Identifying Patients for Anticoagulation: While Many Patients Remain Untreated, Who Should NOT be Anticoagulated?

Evolving Challenges in the Evaluation and Treatment of Lower Extremity PAD -- The Peripheral Academic Research Consortium (PARC)

Troponin I elevation increases the risk of death and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation a RE-LY substudy. Ziad Hijazi, MD

FINAL CDEC RECOMMENDATION

Anticoagulation Beyond Coumadin

What s new with DOACs? Defining place in therapy for edoxaban &

Indications of Anticoagulants; Which Agent to Use for Your Patient? Marc Carrier MD MSc FRCPC Thrombosis Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Conflict of interest statement

Aims. AF and Stroke risk Guidance re anticoagulation Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in non-valvular AF (NVAF) Practical Issues Patient Case Studies

Mohammad Zubaid, MB, ChB, FRCPC, FACC

Let s Gi e The So ethi g To Clot About: Controversies in Anticoagulation

Drug Class Monograph

ESC Congress 2012, Munich

The Stabilization Of plaques using Darapladib (SOLID)-TIMI 52 trial: Primary Results

Design and Analysis of a Cancer Prevention Trial: Plans and Results. Matthew Somerville 09 November 2009

Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD and Keith AA Fox, MB ChB

Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Stents: Is Three Drugs Too Many?

Thrombin Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombosis

Transcription:

Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in 8040 Women Compared with 13065 Men with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Edoxaban vs Warfarin for an Average 2.8 Years RP Giugliano 1, ML O Donoghue 1, CT Ruff 1, P Merlini 2, F Nordio 1, LT Grip 1, V Curt 3, H Lanz 3, M Mercuri 3, E Braunwald 1 on behalf of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Investigators 1 TIMI Study Group, Boston, MA 2 Ospedale Maggiore, Milano, IT 3 Daiichi Sankyo Pharma, Edison, NJ

MY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ARE: Research Grants: Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Honoraria/Consulting: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi- Sankyo, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Portola, Sanofi

Background: Women, Oral Anticoagulation (OAC) and AF Study-level metanalysis of 6 trials* of OAC in patients with AF found: Women treated with warfarin risk of thromboembolism (HR 1.3) c/w men Similar risk of bleeding (HR 0.93) as men Women treated with DOAC Similar risk of thromboembolism (HR 1.1) as men risk of bleeding (HR 0.84) c/w men Limitations: unadjusted, study-level data * 6 RCTs: BAFTA, SPORTIF III/IV, RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE, AVERROES Pancholly SB et al, Am J Card 2014;113:485-90

Study Design 21,105 PATIENTS AF documented within last 12 m CHADS 2 2 RANDOMIZATION 1:1:1 Double-blind, Double-dummy Warfarin (N=7036) (INR 2.0 3.0) Median TTR 68.4% Higher-dose Edoxaban 60* mg QD (N=7035) Lower-dose Edoxaban 30* mg QD (N=7034) Median follow-up 2.8 yrs (~60,000 patient-years) *Edoxaban dose reduced by 50% if: - CrCl 30 50 ml/min - weight 60 kg - strong P-gp inhibitor 1º Efficacy EP = Stroke or SEE 1º Safety EP = Major Bleeding (ISTH criteria) CrCl, creatinine clearance; ISTH, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis; P-gp, P-glycoprotein; SEE, systemic embolic event Ruff CR et al. Am Heart J 2010; 160:635-41 Giugliano RP. NEJM 2013; 369:2093-2104

DRAFT CE-5 Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Stroke or SEE Event rate, Edoxaban vs warfarin Treatment n %/yr HR (97.5% CI) P value Noninferiority (mitt on-treatment) Warfarin 232 1.50 Edoxaban 60/30 mg QD 182 1.18 0.79 (0.63, 0.99) < 0.001 Edoxaban 30/15 mg QD 253 1.61 1.07 (0.87, 1.31) 0.005 " Edoxaban better 0.79 Warfarin! better NI margin 1.38 1.07 Superiority (ITT overall) HR (99% CI) Warfarin 337 1.80 Edoxaban 60/30 mg QD 296 1.57 0.87 (0.71, 1.07) 0.081 Edoxaban 30/15 mg QD 383 2.04 1.13 (0.93, 1.37) 0.098 0.87 1.13 0,5 1 2 Hazard ratio Giugliano RP. NEJM 2013; 369:2093-2104

DRAFT CE-6 Principal Safety Outcome Major Bleeding Safety On-Treatment Outcome Event rate, Edoxaban vs warfarin " Edoxaban Warfarin! Treatment n %/yr HR (95% CI) P value better better Major bleed Warfarin 524 3.43 0.80 Edoxaban 60/30 mg 418 2.75 0.80 (0.71, 0.91) < 0.001 0.47 Edoxaban 30/15 mg 254 1.61 0.47 (0.41, 0.55) < 0.001 0,25 0,5 1 2 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 15 Log-rank P value: Edoxaban 60/30 mg vs warfarin: <0.001 Warfarin Edoxaban 30/15 mg vs warfarin: < 0.001 Cumulative probability of major bleeding, % 10 5 0 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 Time, days Giugliano RP. NEJM 2013; 369:2093-2104

Summary: Main Trial Compared to well-managed warfarin (TTR 68.4%) oncedaily edoxaban: Non-inferior for stroke/see (both regimens) High dose stroke/see on Rx (trend ITT) Both regimens significantly reduced: Major bleeding (20%/53%) ICH (53%/70%) Hemorrhagic stroke (46%/67%) CV death (14%/15%) Superior net clinical outcomes No excess in stroke or bleeding during transition! oral anticoagulant at end of trial Giugliano RP. NEJM 2013; 369:2093-2104

Baseline Characteristics by Gender Women 8040 (38%) Men 13065 (62%) Median Age (years) 74 [67 79] 71 [63 77] Region Western Europe Eastern Europe North America Latin America Asia / Australia / S Africa 15% 37% 20% 13% 14% 15% 32% 24% 12% 17% Paroxysmal AF 30% 23% Median Weight (kg) 74 [64 86] 86 [75 99] CrCl 50 ml/min 28% 14% Dose reduction 36% 19% P<0.001 for all comparisons

Age Distribution by Gender 40 Proportion of patients (%) 30 20 10 Women Men 0 <65 65-74 75-80 80-85 >85 Age

Risk Factors by Gender Women 8040 (38%) Men 13065 (62%) Congestive heart failure 57% 58% Hypertension 95% 93% Diabetes 35% 37% Prior stroke/tia 28% 28% CHADS 2 4 Mean CHADS 2 score CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 4 Mean CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score 25% 2.9 (1.0) 92% 5.0 (1.3) 21% 2.8 (1.0) 58% 3.9 (1.3) HAS-BLED 3 43% 49% Median TTR (warfarin) 67% (55-76) 69% (58-78) P<0.001 for all comparisons, except CHF (p=0.22), prior stroke/tia (p=0.91) CHF, chronic heart failure; TIA, transient ischemic attack; TTR, time in therapeutic range

Annualized Rate of Stroke/SEE by Gender and Age (Warfarin) Women (N=2641) Men (N=4395) Adjusted HR* (95% CI) Adj P* All Ages 2.00% 1.68% 1.22 (0.95, 1.57) 0.125 Age <65 1.08% 1.52% 1.39 (0.69, 2.80) 0.36 65-74 1.79% 1.78% 1.05 (0.68, 1.63) 0.82 > 75 2.56% 2.11% 1.31 (0,91, 1.88) 0.14 > 80 3.13% 2.65% 1.33 (0.78, 2.29) 0.30 *Adjusted for Age, BMI, creatinine, race, region, increased risk of falling, smoking status, pattern of afib, alcohol use, cardiac medications; and prior history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, stroke or TIA, CHF, neuropsychiatric disease, CAD, hepatic disease, non-ich Bleed

Annualized Rate of Major Bleed by Gender and Age (Warfarin) Women (N=2629) Men (N=4383) Adjusted HR* (95% CI) Adj P* All Ages 3.35% 3.47% 0.91 (0.74, 1.13) 0.41 Age <65 1.66% 1.87% 0.83 (0.49, 1.38) 0.47 65-74 2.78% 3.64% 0.80 (0.54, 1.19) 0.27 > 75 4.65% 4.97% 1.02 (0.75, 1.37) 0.92 > 80 5.16% 7.06% 0.70 (0.46, 1.05) 0.09 *Adjusted for Age, BMI, creatinine, race, region, increased risk of falling, smoking status, pattern of afib, alcohol use, cardiac medications; and prior history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, stroke or TIA, CHF, neuropsychiatric disease, CAD, hepatic disease, non-ich Bleed

Secondary Efficacy Outcomes Women vs Men (Warfarin) Endpoint Women Men Adj HR* Adj P* CV death, stroke, SEE 4.15% 4.60% 0.98 0.79 MACE 4.66% 5.18% 0.98 0.76 All cause mortality 3.77% 4.70% 0.86 0.08 CV death 2.73% 3.43% 0.87 0.18 Hemorrhagic stroke 0.50% 0.46% 1.17 0.53 Ischemic stroke 1.41% 1.15% 1.18 0.27 Myocardial infarction 0.62% 0.83% 0.88 0.54 *Adjusted for Age, BMI, creatinine, race, region, increased risk of falling, smoking status, pattern of afib, alcohol use, cardiac medications; and prior history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, stroke or TIA, CHF, neuropsychiatric disease, CAD, hepatic disease, non-ich Bleed CV, cardiovascular; MACE, major adverse cardiac event; SEE, systolic embolic event;

Secondary Safety Outcomes Women vs Men (Warfarin) Endpoint Women Men Adj HR* Adj P* Fatal bleeding 0.33% 0.40% 1.04 0.90 Intracranial bleeding 0.89% 0.82% 1.06 0.80 Death or ICH 4.34% 5.21% 0.88 0.13 Major GI bleeding 1.08% 1.31% 0.92 0.66 Major or clinicallyrelevant non-major bleed 13.6% 12.7% 1.13 0.037 Any bleeding 17.1% 16.0% 1.15 0.009 *Adjusted for Age, BMI, creatinine, race, region, increased risk of falling, smoking status, pattern of afib, alcohol use, cardiac medications; and prior history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, stroke or TIA, CHF, neuropsychiatric disease, CAD, hepatic disease, non-ich Bleed GI, gastrointestinal; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage

Primary Efficacy Outcome by Gender Stroke/SEE: ITT cohort, Overall time period Women Men Warfarin TTR 68.4% Edoxaban 60* mg QD vs warfarin Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.87$ 0.87$ Annual rate Edox Warf 1.76 vs 2.00 1.45 vs 1.68 P -int 0.97 Edoxaban 30* mg QD vs warfarin 1.16$ 1.10$ 2.32 vs 2.00 1.86 vs 1.68 0.76 0.50 1.00 2.0

Primary Safety Outcome by Gender Major Bleeding: Safety cohort, On Treatment Women Warfarin TTR 68.4% Edoxaban 60* mg QD vs warfarin Men Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.74$ 0.84$ Annual rate Edox Warf 2.48 vs 3.35 2.90 vs 3.47 P -int 0.34 Edoxaban 30* mg QD vs warfarin 0.46$ 0.48$ 1.54 vs 3.35 1.66 vs 3.47 0.78 0.25$ 0.5$ 1.0$ 2.0$

Secondary Efficacy Outcomes Higher Dose Edox vs Warfarin Hazard Ratios (HDE vs W) Endpoint Women Men P-int CV death, stroke, SEE 0.87 0.87 0.95 MACE* 0.89 0.88 0.99 All cause mortality 0.93 0.91 0.88 CV death 0.87 0.86 0.97 Hemorrhagic stroke 0.30 0.70 0.037 Ischemic stroke 1.08 0.94 0.44 Myocardial infarction 0.99 0.91 0.75 CV, cardiovascular; HDE, high dose edoxaban; MACE, major adverse cardiac event; SEE, systolic embolic event; W, warfarin

Secondary Safety Outcomes Higher Dose Edox vs Warfarin Hazard Ratios (HDE vs W) Endpoint Women Men P-int Fatal bleeding 0.38 0.63 0.32 Intracranial bleeding 0.20 0.63 0.003 Death or ICH 0.80 0.69 0.42 Major GI bleeding 1.34 1.19 0.59 Major or clinically-relevant non-major bleeding 0.76 0.92 0.011 Any bleeding 0.78 0.92 0.010 CV, cardiovascular; GI, gastrointestinal; HDE, high dose edoxaban; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; W, warfarin

Net Clinical Outcomes Higher Dose Edox vs Warfarin Hazard Ratios (HDE vs W) Endpoint Women Men P-int Death, Stroke, Systemic embolism, or Major Bleeding Death, disabling stroke or life-threatening bleeding Death, Stroke, SEE or lifethreatening bleeding 0.89 0.89 0.99 0.85 0.91 0.49 0.85 0.89 0.62 HDE, high dose edoxaban, SEE, systolic embolic event; W, warfarin

Summary In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial, warfarin arm Women and men have similar risk of ischemic events, death, major bleeding after adjustment Non-major bleeding more frequent women Comparison of Edoxaban vs Warfarin Efficacy of high-dose edoxaban is comparable in women and men The superior safety profile of edoxaban overall in the main trial was enhanced in women as compared to men

MILLE GRAZIE!!! UNITED STATES (3907) E. Antman; R. Giugliano CHINA (469) Y. Yang DENMARK (219) P. Grande CROATIA (127) M. Bergovec POLAND (1278) W. Ruzyllo HUNGARY (464) R. Kiss ESTONIA (191) J. Voitk PHILIPPINES (125) N. Babilonia CZECH REPUBLIC (1173) J. Spinar ROMANIA (410) M. Dorobantu MEXICO (190) A. García-Castillo THAILAND (115) P. Sritara RUSSIAN FEDERATION (1151) M. Ruda SLOVAKIA (405) T. Duris PORTUGAL (180) J. Morais TURKEY (111) A. Oto UKRAINE (1148) A. Parkhomenko UNITED KINGDOM (400) J. Camm PERU (173) M. Horna FRANCE (110) J.J. Blanc ARGENTINA (1059) ISRAEL (283) AUSTRALIA (102) E. Paolasso B. Lewis ITALY (169) P. Merlini; M. Metra JAPAN (1010) Y. Koretsune; T. Yamashita SERBIA (277) M. Ostojic SPAIN (166) J.L. Zamorano GREECE (51) D. Alexopoulos GERMANY (913) V. Mitrovic SOUTH AFRICA (277) A. Dalby NETHERLANDS (153) T. Oude Ophuis FINLAND (42) M. Nieminen CANADA (774) D. Roy CHILE (254) R. Corbalan BELGIUM (149) H. Heidbuchel NORWAY (34) D. Atar BRAZIL (707) J.C. Nicolau SWEDEN (252) S. Juul-Möller COLOMBIA (141) R. Botero SWITZERLAND (5) T. Moccetti INDIA (690) B. SomaRaju TAIWAN (234) S. Chen GUATEMALA (136) G. Sotomora BULGARIA (520) A. Goudev SOUTH KOREA (230) N. Chung NEW ZEALAND (131) H. White P. Aylward 21

22

(%) 5,0 Stroke/SEE by Gender and Age 4,0 Men Women 3,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 <65 male <65 female 65-74 male 65-74 female 75 male female >75 female 80 male >80 80 female 85 male 85 female n$ 138$ 50$ $ 198$ 133$ $ 244$ 253$ $ 114$ 133$ $ 35$ 33$ N$ 3987$ 1510$ 4381$ 2753$ 4697$ 3777$ 1937$ 1654$ 493$ 406$ Kato ET, AHA 2014 Chicago, IL

(%) 10,0 Major Bleeding by Gender and Age Men Women 8,0 6,0 4,0 2,0 0,0 <65 male <65 female 65-74 male 65-74 female 75 male female >75 female 80 male 80 female 85 male 85 female n$ 133$ 43$ $ 264$ 129$ $ 383$ 244$ $ 187$ 109$ $ 58$ 27$ N$ 6486$ 2524$ 7376$ 4531$ 8205$ 6235$ 3425$ 2690$ 848$ 636$ Kato ET, AHA 2014 Chicago, IL