The St. Jude Medical Biocor Bioprosthesis

Similar documents
16 YEAR RESULTS Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Mitral Pericardial Bioprosthesis, Model 6900

A 20-year experience of 1712 patients with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis

CLINICAL COMMUNIQUE 16 YEAR RESULTS

Trifecta Valve. Clinical Compendium. Five Year Data

PATIENT BOOKLET MEDTRONIC SURGICAL VALVE REPLACEMENT. Tissue Valve for Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement

PROVEN PLUS. Introducing the Avalus Aortic Valve by Medtronic.

St Jude Medical Epic porcine bioprosthesis: Results of the regulatory evaluation

Bioprostheses are prone to continuous degeneration

15-Year Comparison of Supra-Annular Porcine and PERIMOUNT Aortic Bioprostheses

Carpentier-Edwards Pericardial Valve in the Aortic Position: 25-Years Experience

ORIGINAL PAPER. The long-term results and changing patterns of biological valves at the mitral position in contemporary practice in Japan

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Center, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: Clinical performance over 20 years

Late failure of transcatheter heart valves: An open question

Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC, FRCS (Glasgow), FACC, FESC President of Saudi Heart Association King Abdulaziz Cardiac Centre Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC FACC, FESC President Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons Associate Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery King Abdulaziz

CoreValve in a Degenerative Surgical Valve

Repeated mitral valve replacement in a patient with extensive annular calcification

Aortic valve replacement: is porcine or bovine valve better?

Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless prosthesis: 7 years experience in 130 patients

Expanding Relevance of Aortic Valve Repair Is Earlier Operation Indicated?

How to Record & Send Information

PORTICO CE TRIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE ST. JUDE MEDICAL PORTICO TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANT AND THE TRANSFEMORAL DELIVERY SYSTEM

Mitroflow Aortic Bioprosthesis 5-Year Follow-Up: North American Prospective Multicenter Study

P have been used for mitral and aortic valve replacement

Hemodynamic Performance of the Medtronic Mosaic Porcine Bioprosthesis Up to Ten Years

42yr Old Male with Severe AR Mild LV dysfunction s/p TOF -AV Replacement(tissue valve) or AoV plasty- Kyung-Hwan Kim

Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Replacement: Results of Two European Centers

Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: Assessment of 12-year performance

Mechanical vs. Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: Time to Reconsider? Christian Shults, MD Cardiac Surgeon, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute

Reoperation for Bioprosthetic Mitral Structural Failure: Risk Assessment

Durability and Outcome of Aortic Valve Replacement With Mitral Valve Repair Versus Double Valve Replacement

Durability of Pericardial Versus Porcine Aortic Valves

TSDA Boot Camp September 13-16, Introduction to Aortic Valve Surgery. George L. Hicks, Jr., MD

Make the Connection A clinical compendium on the relationship between AF, stroke, and early intervention

Treatment of Bio-Prosthetic Valve Deterioration Using Transcatheter Techniques

Magdalena Erlebach 1, Michael Wottke 1, Marcus-André Deutsch 1, Markus Krane 1, Nicolo Piazza 2, Ruediger Lange 1, Sabine Bleiziffer 1

INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic Valve

Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease. Reoperation of Left Heart Valve Bioprostheses According to Age at Implantation

Choice of Prosthetic Heart Valve in Adults

Porcine bioprosthesis use for surgical treatment of

UNDERSTANDING YOUR HEART VALVE. Mosaic Tissue Valve

Incorporating the intermediate risk in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

What is TAVR? Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Tissue vs Mechanical What s the Data??

Standarized definition of bioprosthetic valve deterioration and failure

Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation System. portico PRECISION

Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

Hemodynamics Benefit of Supra-Annular Design in Failed Bio-Prosthetic Valves

Reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrous body during aortic and

2017 Cardiovascular Symposium CARDIAC SURGERY UPDATE: SMALLER INCISIONS AND LESS COUMADIN DAVID L. SAINT, MD

Read at the Twenty-fourth Annual Meeting of The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, Whistler, British Columbia, June 24-27, 1998.

The CarboMedics bileaflet prosthetic heart was introduced

TAV-IN-SAV SIZING GUIDE Evolut TAVR Transcatheter Aortic Valve in Degenerative Surgical Bioprosthesis

ViewFlex Xtra ICE Catheter. Positioning Reference Manual

Mitral Valve Repair Versus Replacement in Simultaneous Mitral and Aortic Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Disease

P substitutes since the introduction of the Ionescu-

Early Experience of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Results from the Intrepid Global Pilot Study

CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERICARDIAL VALVES IN THE MITRAL POSITION: TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

W e have previously reported the results of a randomised

Perioperative imaging for assessing aortic and mitral valve diseases and surgical procedures... 3

TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 Valve. See the Clinical Difference

A Surgeon s Perspective Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease Adapted from the 2006 ACC/AHA Guideline Revision

T sors in the following aspects: the porcine aortic valve

Clinical material and methods. Copyright by ICR Publishers 2003

Spotlight on valvular heart disease guidelines. Prosthetic heart valves. Bernard Iung Bichat Hospital, Paris Diderot University Paris, France

Indication, Timing, Assessment and Update on TAVI

REF. Instructions for use Stented Porcine Tissue Valves Epic / Epic Supra INDICATIONS FOR USE CONTRAINDICATIONS DEVICE DESCRIPTION

Controversy exists regarding which valve type is best

Kinsing Ko, Thom de Kroon, Najim Kaoui, Bart van Putte, Nabil Saouti. St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands

Biological or mechanical valve prosthesis?

Important Safety Information

AMPLATZER Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder

MITROFLOW VALSALVA CONDUIT TM

Extension to medium and low risk patients? Friedrich Eckstein University Hospital Basel

Long-Term Outcome of the Carpentier-Edwards Pericardial Valve in the Aortic Position in Japanese Patients

Surgical AVR: Are there any contraindications? Pyowon Park Samsung Medical Center Seoul, Korea

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Mitral Valve Prostheses

The clinical experience reported in recent Western series has provided

BEFORE AND AFTER YOUR MRI SCAN. For patients with St. Jude Medical neurostimulation systems for chronic pain

Nearly 40 years after the pioneering efforts of Starr and

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic valve stenosis with the ACURATE neo2 valve system: 30-day safety and performance outcomes

by Age Groups W. R. E. Jamieson, M.D., L. J. Rosado, M.D., A. I. Munro, M.D., A. N. Gerein, M.D., L. H. Burr, M.D., R. T. Miyagishima, M.D.

DISCLOSURE. Mitral ViV: why? Mitral Valve- in- Valve: Procedural Image Guidance with TEE, a Must Have or Nice to Have? UW Medicine NONE.

Mitroflow Synergy Prostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: 19 Years Experience With 1,516 Patients

THE IMPACT OF AGE, CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, AND CARDIAC COMORBIDITY ON LATE SURVIVAL AFTER BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT

Long-Term Results With the Medtronic-Hall Valvular Prosthesis

LONG-TERM OUTCOME AFTER BIOLOGIC VERSUS MECHANICAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN 841 PATIENTS

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Professor and Chief, Division of Cardiac Surgery Chief Medical Officer, Harpoon Medical. The Houston Aortic Symposium February 23-25, 2017

Appropriate Use of TAVR - now and in the future. A Surgeon s Perspective. Neil Moat Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK

P found suitable valve substitutes for clinical use.

LONG-TERM RESULTS OF HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH THE EDWARDS DUROMEDICS BILEAFLET PROSTHESIS: A PROSPECTIVE TEN-YEAR CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP

Update on Oral Anticoagulation for Mechanical Heart Valves

The operative mortality rate after redo valvular operations

Citation Journal of cardiac surgery (2015), 文は出版社版でありません 引用の際には出版社版をご確認ご利用ください This is not the published

Aspirin or Coumadin as the Drug of Choice

A valve was initiated at the Medical University of

Alec Vahanian,FESC, FRCP (Edin.) Bichat Hospital University Paris VII, Paris, France

1198 MINAKATA K et al. Circ J 2017; 81: ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi: /circj.CJ

Transcription:

The St. Jude Medical Biocor Bioprosthesis Clinical Evidence of Long-term Durability Long-term Biocor Experience A Review and Comparative Assessment

Long-term Biocor Stented Tissue Valve Studies Twenty-year studies from two medical centers were recently published on the St. Jude Medical Biocor stented tissue valve. 2

Objectives The objectives of these studies were to evaluate the longterm performance of the Biocor stented tissue valve in durability, patient survival and adverse events. The two studies were performed independently of each other and published in different major cardiac surgery journals within four months of each other. Both centers consecutively enrolled patients. Dr. Myken has reported her study results at 10, 15, 17, and now 20 years follow-up. 3

The Biocor Stented Tissue Valve Study Results: Aortic Long-Term Biocor Study Results

Demographics and Valve Size Distribution - Aortic Age (mean) 72.5±9 years Age (mean) 70.8±10.9 years Gender 239 male 216 female Gender 964 male 554 female NYHA (preop) I 0 (0%) NYHA (preop) I 122 (8.0%) II 14 (3.0%) II 381 (25.0%) III 155 (34.0%) III 855 (56.0%) IV 49 (10.8%) IV 129 (8.4%) unknown 237 (52.0%) unknown 31 (2.0%) Concomitant Procedures Valve Size CABG Other 21mm 23mm 25mm 27mm 29mm 171 (37.6%) 26 (5.7%) 60 (13.2%) 182 (40.0%) 160 (35.2%) 43 (9.5%) 10 (2.2%) Eichinger W, 20-Year experience with the St. Jude Medical Biocor bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86 (4) 1204-11 455 consecutive patients were admitted for aortic valve replacement and enrolled from January 1985 to December 1996. Valve selection was physician preference. 1 Concomitant Procedures Valve Size* CABG 21mm 23mm 25mm 27mm 29mm 31mm 33mm 632 (42%) 113 (7%) 623 (41%) 489 (32%) 219 (14%) 57 (4%) 13 (<1%) 3 (<1%) Myken P, A Twenty-Year experience of 1712 patients with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. J Thorac and Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137: 76-81 1518 consecutive aortic valve replacement patients were enrolled in this study between 1983 and 2003. 2 *Data missing for 1 patient 5

Results: Long-term Aortic Durability Actuarial Freedom from Reoperation due to SVD (Ages 65 unless specified) Biocor 20 yrs Ages >65 (Myken) 2 92.1% Biocor 20 yrs Ages >65 <75 (Eichinger) 1 86.6% C-E Perimount 20 yrs (Edwards Communiqué) 3 81.5% Mitroflow 20 yrs (Yankah) 4 71.8% Hancock II 20 yrs (Borger) 5 73.0% 6

Results: Long-term Aortic Durability Actuarial Freedom from Reoperation due to SVD (All ages unless specified) Biocor (20 yrs) 1 Mean age 72.5±9 yrs 86.5% Biocor (17 yrs) 6 Mean age 70±11 yrs Mitroflow (17 yrs) 7 Mean age 72.4±8.4 67.0% 73.9% Mitroflow (20 yrs) 4 Mean age 73.2 62.3% C-E Perimount (19 yrs) Mean age 65± 11 yrs 8 Hancock II (20 yrs) 5 65y age 47.0% 73.0% 7

Results: Long-term Aortic Durability Actuarial Freedom from Reoperation due to SVD (Ages 65 unless otherwise specified) Biocor (20 yrs) 1 71.8% Biocor (17 yrs) 6 Ages 61-70 years 82.1% Mitroflow (17 yrs) 4 Ages 60 69 years 60.1% Hancock II (20 yrs) 5 C-E Perimount (18 yrs) 9 Ages <65 39.0% 35.8% 8

Results: Biocor Aortic Long-term Durability Patients 65 (unless specified) Patients 65 (unless specified) Biocor (20 yrs) 2 Ages >65 92.1% Biocor (20 yrs) 1 71.8% Biocor (20 yrs) 1 Ages >65<75 86.6% Biocor (17 yrs) 6 Ages 61-70 years 82.1% CE Perimount (20 yrs) 3 81.5% Mitroflow (20 yrs) 4 Ages 60 69 60.1% Mitroflow (20 yrs) 4 71.8% Hancock II (20 yrs) 5 < 65 39.0% Hancock II (20 yrs) 5 73.0% CE Perimount (18 yrs) 9 Ages <65 35.8% Patients All Ages (unless specified) Biocor (20 yrs) 1 Mean age 72.5±9 86.5% Biocor (17 yrs) 6 Mean age 70±11 73.9% Mitroflow (17 yrs) 7 Mean age 72.4±8.4 67.0% Mitroflow (20 yrs) 4 Mean age 73.2±8.4 62.3% In long-term studies the Biocor aortic valve has demonstrated excellent durability in different patient age groups. CE Perimount (19 yrs) 8 Mean age 65±11 47.0% Hancock II (20 yrs) 5 65y 73.0% 9

The Biocor Stented Tissue Valve Study Results: Mitral Biocor Long-term Study Results

Demographics and Valve Size Distribution - Mitral Age (mean) Gender NYHA (preop) Concomitant Procedure Valve Size 64.9±12.3 years 95 male 99 female I II III IV unknown CABG 25mm 27mm 29mm 31mm 2 (1%) 20 (10%) 128 (65%) 44 (22%) 0 65 (34%) 3 (1%) 20 (10%) 51 (26%) 57 (29%) 194 consecutive patients were admitted for mitral valve replacement between 1983 and 2003. 2 The majority of patients were in NYHA class III (65%) preoperatively. 34% of the mitral patients also had a CABG procedure. 33mm 63 (32%) Myken P, A Twenty-Year experience of 1712 patients with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. J Thorac and Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137: 76-81 11

Results: Long-term Durability in the Mitral Position: Actuarial Freedom from Reoperation due to SVD (Ages >65 unless specified) Biocor 20 yrs (Myken) 2 88.0% Hancock II 20 yrs Ages 65 yrs (Borger) 5 59.0% 12

13 Actuarial freedom from reoperation due to SVD by age group: MVR 2

Clinical Evidence Tissue Valve Leadership: Undeniable Proof Based on Decades of Experience Long-term Durability in the Aortic Position: Actuarial Freedom from Reoperation due to SVD (ages >65 unless specified) Long-term Durability in the Mitral Position: Actuarial Freedom from Reoperation due to SVD (ages >65 unless specified) 92.1% Biocor (20 yrs) 2 Biocor (20 yrs) 1 ages >65<75 86.6% Biocor (20 yrs) 2 88.0% CEP (20 yrs) 3 ages 65 Hancock II ages 65 (20 yrs) 5 C-E Perimount (18 yrs) 3 81.5% 73.0% Hancock II ages 65 (20 yrs) 5 59.0% 14

Conclusion Long-term durability is the most important parameter when evaluating bioprosthesis, and these results clearly demonstrate the excellent durability of the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis over twenty years in both aortic and mitral positions. 2 The long-term durability of the Biocor valve is excellent and confirms the results of other studies on this bioprosthesis. The Biocor porcine stented valve has lower structural valve deterioration and reoperation rates as compared to most other bioprostheses. 1 These excellent long-term outcomes confirm the results of other Biocor studies with lower SVD and reoperation rates as compared to most other bioprostheses. Walter Eichinger, MD 15

References 1. Eichinger W, Hettich I, Ruzicka D, Holper K, Schricker C, Bleiziffer S, Lange R. 20-Year Experience with the St. Jude Medical Biocor Bioprosthesis in the Aortic Position, Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86(4), 1204-1210. Study size = 455 AVR (239 Male, 216 Female). 2. Myken, P. A Twenty-Year experience of 1712 Patients with the Biocor Porcine Bioprosthesis. J Thorac and Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137:76 81. Study size = 1712m. 1518 AVR ( 964 Male 554 Female) 194 MVR (95 Male, 99 Female). 3. Edwards Lifesciences Clinical Communiqué 20 Year Results Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Aortic Pericardial Bioprosthesis, 2003. Study size = 267, (171 male 96 female). 4. Yankah CA, Pasic M, Musci M, Stein J, Detschades C, Siniawski H, Hetzer R. Aortic Valve Replacement with the Mitroflow Pericardial Bioprosthesis: Durability Results up to 21 Years. J Thoracic and Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:688-96. Study size= 1513, (442 male, 1071 female). 5. Borger MA, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Christie-Hrybinsky D, Feindel CM, David TE. Twenty-year Results of the Hancock II Bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 2006; 15:49-56. Study size= 1010 aortic (768 male 242 female) and 559 mitral (257 male 302 female). 6. Myken P. Seventeen-Year Experience with the St. Jude Medical Biocor Porcine Bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Disease 2005;14:486-492. Study size= 1283 aortic (821 male and 462 female) and 172 mitral (83 male and 89 female). 7. Yankah CA, Schubel J, Buz S, Sinawski H, Hetzer R. Seventeen-Year Clinical Results of 1037 Mitroflow Pericardial Heart Valve Prosthesis in the Aortic Position. J Heart Valve Dis, 2005; 14:172-180. Study size= 1037 (322 male and 715 female). 8. Smedira N, Blackstone E, Roselli E, Laffey C. Cosgrove D. Are Allografts the Biologic Valve of Choice for Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonelderly Patients? Comparison of Explantation for Structural Valve Deterioration of Allograft and Pericardial Prostheses. J Thoracic and Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:558-564. Study size= 478 (297 male and 181 female). 9. Biglioli P, Spampinato N, Cannata A, Musumeci A, Parolari A, Gagliardi C, Alamanni F. Long-Term Outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Pericardial Valve Prosthesis in the Aortic Position: Effect of Patient Age. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13 (Supplement 1): S49-S51. Study size= 327 (172 male and 155 female). 16

CAUTION: FEDERAL LAW RESTRICTS THIS DEVICE TO SALE ONLY BY OR ON THE ORDER OF A PHYSICIAN. Brief Summary. St. Jude Medical Stented Tissue Valves are indicated for use as a replacement for malfunctioning native or prosthetic aortic and/or mitral valves. Adverse events potentially associated with the use of bioprosthetic heart valves include: angina, cardiac arrhythmia, endocarditis, heart failure, hemolysis, hemolytic anemia, hemorrhage (anticoagulant/anti-platelet-related), leak (transvalvular or paravalvular) myocardial infarction, nonstructural dysfunction (e.g. pannus, suture, inappropriate sizing, or other), prosthesis regurgitation, stroke, structural deterioration (e.g. calcification, leaflet tear, or other), thromboembolism and valve thrombosis. It is possible that these complications could lead to: reoperation, explantation, permanent disability, or death. Long-term anticoagulation and/or anti-platelet therapy should be considered in patients with dilated left atrium, a history of thrombotic events, or a cardiac rhythm of atrial fibrillation or flutter. Please see the Instructions for Use (IFU) for a full description of indications, contraindications, side effects, precautions, warnings, and Instructions for Use. www.sjm.com St. Jude Medical St. Jude Medical Europe, Inc. St. Jude Medical Brasil, Ltda. St. Jude Medical (Hong Kong) Limited Global Headquarters The Corporate Village Rue Frei, Caneca 1380-9 A-CJ91/92 Unit 2701-07, COSCO Tower One Lillehei Plaza Avenue Da Vinci Iaan, 11-Box F1 Sao Paulo SP Brasil Grand Millenium Plaza St. Paul, MN 55117, USA B-1935 Zaventem CEP 01307-022 183 Queen s Road 651 483 2000 Belgium + 55 11 5080 5400 Central, Hong Kong 651 482 8318 Fax + 32 2 774 68 11 + 55 11 5080 5423 Fax + 852 2996 7688 + 852 2956 0622 Fax Biocor, Epic, FlexFit, ST. JUDE MEDICAL, the nine-squares logo and MORE CONTROL. LESS RISK. are trademarks of St. Jude Medical, Inc. or its affiliates. 2009 St. Jude Medical. All Rights Reserved. 17