ody weight (g) A re,f/f re x f/f f/+ re, f/+ re,f/+ f/f x f/f f/+ cs -/- re, f/f re f/f re, f/f Normal chow Tamoxifen Tamoxifen Tamoxifen W 4W re f/f re, re/ff f/f re f/f re, re/ff f/f Normal chow Tamoxifen chow Supplemental Figure. Generation of knockout mice. (A) reeding of f/f (denoted as f/f) mice with αmh-mm (denoted as re) mice to generate MM/ f/f (denoted as re, f/f) mice. () Protocol for oral administration of tamoxifen in different experimental groups. ardiac function was assessed at and 4 weeks after the completion of tamoxifen treatment. Arrows refer to the time when echocardiography was performed. () Mean body weight and food intake in controls, αmh- MM (represented as re) and f/f (represented as f/f) and αmh-mm/ f/f (represented as cre, f/f) mice treated with normal and tamoxifen chow (n=7- independent experiments). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. P <. versus normal chow.
mrna levels.4 -/- cs -/-..8.6.4. mrna levels (relative expression) 4 -/- cs -/- Tamoxifen chow Normal chow Adipose rain Kidney Liver Lung Spleen GAPDH Supplemental Figure. expression in the heart and other organs of control and cs -/- mice. (A) mrna levels (as determined by RT-PR) of cardiac samples from control and cs -/- mice after tamoxifen administration at different time points (n=6 independent experiments). () mrna levels in different organs of control and cs -/- mice (n=6 independent experiments). () Western blot analysis of in different organs of control and cs -/- mice 4 weeks after tamoxifen treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. P <..
Normal chow Tamoxifen chow αmh-mm, f/f αmh-mm f/f M-mode %EF 7 6 4 f/f %FS re re, f/f re re, f/f f/f D LVID-d (mm) 4 Tamoxifen Normal chow E IVS-d.8.6.4. Tamoxifen Normal chow f/f Tamoxifen re re, f/f re re, f/f f/f Normal chow Tamoxifen Normal chow Supplemental Figure. ardiac function in three sets of control animals by echocardiographic assessment. (A) representative M-mode images from indicated mice at weeks. EF (), FS (), LVID-d (D), and interventricular septal thickness at enddiastole (IVS-d) (E) (n=- independent experiments). Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Heart weight/tibia length (mg/mm) 8 7 6 4 Lung weight/tibia length (mg/mm) 8 6 4 cs -/- cs -/- cs -/- Tibia length (mm) Supplemental Figure 4. Morphologic changes of control ( f/f littermates) and cs -/- mice 4 weeks after tamoxifen treatment. (A) Ratio of heart weight to tibia length (n= independent experiments). () Ratio of lung weight to tibia length (n= independent experiments). () Tibia length (n= independent experiments). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. P <..
NP mrna NP mrna A 8 7 9 8 6 7 4 6 4 cs -/- -/- -/- cs -/- Supplemental Figure. mrna levels of (A) atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and () brain natriuretic peptide (NP) in the hearts of control and cs -/- mice at 4 weeks after tamoxifen administration (n=6 independent experiments). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. P <..
4 TAG (mg/dl) control cs-/- expression..8.6.4. Tubulin TAG content (nmol/µg protein).6.4..8.6.4. Supplemental Figure 6. Serum triacylglycerol (TAG) level with knockdown. (A) Serum TAG levels in cs -/- hearts (n=7 independent experiments). () Western blot analysis of expression in NRM treated with and control for 48 hours ( n= independent experiments). () TAG levels in NRM treated with control or for 48 hours (n=6 independent experiments). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. P <..
A Glucose oxidation (nmol/g dry wt/min) Glucose uptake (cpm/µg protein) 6 4 7 6 4 8 6 4 cs -/- mrna levels D..8.6.4. EAR mph/min/mg protein.4 HKII cs-/- Glut Glut4 Supplemental Figure 7. Assessment of myocardial glucose metabolism in vivo and in vitro. (A) Glucose oxidation measured in working hearts (n=6 independent experiments). () mrna levels of HKII, Glut and Glut4 determined by qrt-pr on cardiac muscle samples of control and cs -/- mice (n=-6 mice per genotype). () Glucose uptake as measured by 4 - labeled glucose in NRM after treatment with control and (n=6 independent experiments). (D) Extracellular acidification rate (EAR) measured with the XF4 Extracellular Flux Analyzer in NRM transfected with control or (n= 6 independent experiments). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. P <. vs control.
A PPARα PPAR-α mrna levels... Relative intensity... Tubulin Supplemental Figure 8. Expression of PPARα in NRM treated with control and for 48 hours. (A) PPARα mrna levels were determined by qrt-pr and 8S ribosomal was used as a internal control (n=6 independent experiments). () PPARα protein levels analyzed by Western blot (n=6 independent experiments). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. P <..
GAPDH.4 IgG Fold enrichment..8.6.4. Fold enrichment. IgG.. 8S β-actin WD ELMO UGP Supplemental Figure 9. Effective knockdown of in HEK9 cells and Positive and negative controls for hip studies. (A) Western blot of HEK9 cells treated with control or and blotted with antibody. () Negative controls for the hip studies. The amplified regions do not contain any predicted HRE sites, and therefore is not regulated by (n=). () Positive controls for the hip studies (n=). These genes have been shown to be regulated by as described in the Methods section. WD, obalamin Synthetase W Domain-ontaining Protein ; ELMO, Engulfment And ell Motility ; UGP, UDP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase. Data are represented as fold enrichment over IgG samples and are shown as mean ± SEM. P <. vs control. N= independent experiments for and.
mrna..8.6.4. HIFα mrna..8.6.4. : : HIFα HIFα mrna..8.6.4. D AHR mrna..8.6.4. : HIFα : AHR Supplemental Figure. Effective reduction in the mrna levels of (A) and its partners, HIFα (), HIFα (), and AHR (D) using approach in NRM (n=6 independent experiments). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. P <. vs control.
PPARα mrna levels (Fold hnge).8.6.4..8.6.4. N.S. N.S. DMSO TSA Relative Expression.... ITPR DMSO TSA JAG Relative Expression... DMSO TSA ITPR JAG Supplemental Figure. Regulation of PPARα promoter by is not mediated by HDAS. (A) PPARα mrna levels in NRM treated with HDA inhibitor, trichostatin A (TSA) and in the presence and absence of. Positive control for TSA treatment in NRMs treated with control- () or - (). The expression of these genes is shown to be increased with HDA inhibition (irc Res. ;97:-8). ITPR=inositol,4,-trisphosphate receptor, type ; JAG=jagged. P <. vs control. N=6 independent experiments for all of the panels.
HDA HDA Tubulin Fold Enrichment over IgG 4. 4.... control- - HDA HDA4 Tubulin acetylated-h acetylated H4 D Fold Enrichment over IgG 9 8 7 6 4 acetylated-h control- - acetylated H4 Protein Expression (Fold hange) E.4. Fold Enrichment over IgG.8.6.4. 8 7 6 4 control- control- - acetylated-h - HDA HDA HDA HDA 4 acetylated H4 Supplemental Figure. HDA levels and histone acetylation are not altered by. (A) HDA, HDA, HDA, and HDA4 protein levels in NRM treated with control or. A Summary bar graph is shown in Panel. hip studies assessing the Levels of acetylated histone H and H4 on the PPARα promoter (), and on the promoter of two known target genes, OW domain containing protein (WD, D), and UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase- (UGP, E) in HepG cells treated with control or. Data are presented as fold enrichment over IgG. P <. vs control. N= independent experiments for panel -E.
. Relative expression.. control db/db Supplemental Figure. PPARα mrna levels in the hearts of control and db/db mice. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. P <.. n=6 independent experiments per group.
cs -/- UP UP Tubulin Protein expression 4.... control cs+/- -/- UP UP Supplemental Figure 4. UP and UP protein levels in the heart of cs -/- mice. A summary bar graph of the results is provided below the Western blot gels. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. P <. versus normal chow.
x re, f/f PPARα -/- re, f/+, PPARα +/- x re, f/f re, f/f, PPARα +/- x re, f/f, PPARα +/- re, f/f, PPARα -/- cs -/- PPARα -/- PPARα -/- cs -/- 44 bp: re 4 bp: WT PPARα bp: f/f bp: WT DAPI 6 bp: PPARα -/- 4 bp: WT Overlay Supplemental Figure. reeding scheme for generation of cs -/- /PPARα -/- double knockout mice. (A) Interbreeding plan of PPARα -/- and re, f/f Knockout mice. () Double knockout mice were selected by genotyping as indicated. () Tissue sections were stained for PPARα (green), (red), and DAPI (nuclei in blue) in hearts from control, c -/- and cs -/- /PPARα -/- double knockout mice. The experiment was repeated three times.
ANP mrna 8 7 6 4 cs -/- cs -/- NP mrna.8.6.4..8.6.4. PPARα -/- cs -/- cs -/- PPARα -/- Supplemental Figure 6. mrna levels of (A) atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and () brain natriuretic peptide (NP) in the hearts of control, cs -/- and cs -/- /PPARα -/- double knockout mice 4 weeks after tamoxifen (n=-7 independent experiments). Data are presented as means ± SEM. P <. vs control.
Supplemental Table parameter week (Tomaxifen) Week (Tomxifen) Week ( N how) group cs -/- cs -/- PPARα -/- cs -/- cs -/- PPARα -/- cs -/- cs -/- PPARα -/- n 7 7 7 IVS-d, mm.7 ±..69 ±.6.7 ±..79 ±.7.6 ±..67 ±.4.77 ±.6.84 ±..87 ±. LVPW-d,.6 ±..9 ±..64 ±..8 ±.. ±.4.6 ±..6 ±..67 ±..64 ±.4 mm LVID-d, mm.86 ±..78 ±.44.77 ±.44.6 7 ±. 4.8 ±.8 4. ±.8.8 ±. 4.6 ±.4.99 ±.6 %FS 6.9 ±..9 9 ± 7.644 ±. ±.88 7.6 ±.94. ±.7. ±.4. ±.97 7.64 ±.7.. %EF.6 ± 4.49 4. ±.87.9 ±.8 6.4 ±.76 8. ±.8 47.4 ±.6 6. ±. 4. ±.6.4 ±.6 O, ml/min.7 ±.8 9. ± 4.44 4.44 ±.84 4.64 ± 9. 9.4 ±.4.76 ±.48. ±.. ±. 6.7 ± 6. HR, min 44 ± 8.6 447 ± 4. 487 ± 6. 48 ±.9 488 ± 4. 47 ±. 489 ±. 4 ±. 47 ±. Echocardiographic assessment of control, cs -/- and cs -/- PPARα -/- double knockout mice performed, and weeks after tamoxifen treatment and followed with one week normal chow. End-diastolic interventricular septum thickness (IVS-d); End-diastolic posterior wall thickness (LVPW-d); left ventricular diastolic internal diameter (LVID-d); fractional shorting (%FS); Ejection fraction (%EF); cardiac output (O) and heart rate (HR) were assessed. Animal number used in each group was indicated. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. P <. vs control.