Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Disparities: A National Perspective (anything else?) Catherine Lindsey Satterwhite Region IV IPP Meeting October 8, 2009

Similar documents
National Chlamydia Update

Trends in STDs: US Perspective. Michael Towns, M.D. WW Vice President, Medical Affairs BD Diagnostic Systems

Successful interventions to increase use of Self Obtained Vaginal Swabs (SOVs) for chlamydia/gonorrhea testing in WA State

D. Fine, S. Goldenkranz and W. Nakatsukasa-Ono Cardea, Seattle WA National STD Prevention Conference

Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Surveillance Report, 2017

4. Chlamydia. Treatment: Treating infected patients prevents further transmission to sex partners. In addition, treatment of chlamydia in pregnant

CHLAMYDIAL INFECTION

Region X IPP Vaginal Swabs Update

Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2005 Supplement

Trends in Reportable Sexually Transmitted Diseases in the United States, 2007

ELIMINATING HEALTH DISPARITIES IN AN URBAN AREA. VIRGINIA A. CAINE, M.D., DIRECTOR MARION COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA May 1, 2002

STDs among Men who Have Sex with Men (MSM), San Francisco

The Impact of Sexually Transmitted Diseases(STD) on Women

Mortality Slide Series. National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention

Gonorrhea Cook County Department of Public Health

Setting the Context: Understanding the Numbers, Vulnerable Populations and Federal Public Health Policy

Syphilis Cook County Department of Public Health

FP clinic chlamydia screening coverage: Some method issues and results

2006 Minnesota Sexually Transmitted Disease Statistics

Howard Brown Health Center

Reducing Disparities in HIV and STDs: Tackling the Challenges in the Southern States and Puerto Rico

Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2004 Division of STD Prevention September 2005

Health Disparities in HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, and Tuberculosis in the United States

Genital Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management. William M. Geisler M.D., M.P.H. University of Alabama at Birmingham

Yolo County Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Trends,

2013 Minnesota Sexually Transmitted Disease Statistics

Leverage Existing Resources with the Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Prevalence Monitoring Toolkit National Reproductive Health Conference Monday, August 4

Sexually Transmitted Infections in Colorado Annual Report

AIDS Cases by Exposure Category. Top 10 AIDS Cases by State/Territory. State HIV/AIDS Data. International Statistics

Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, and Syphilis in Alaska

2012 Minnesota Sexually Transmitted Disease Statistics

Women and HIV: The U.S. Perspective

BALTIMORE CITY HIV/AIDS EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE Second Quarter Data reported through June 30, 2008

Communities and Universities Working Together to Reduce Cancer Disparities Symposium 2005 UCLA

Missouri Statewide Integrated HIV Prevention and Care Plan, including the Statewide Coordinated Statement of Need, CY

Chlamydia Screening among Pregnancy Test Only Visits Region I:

HIV/AIDS EPIDEMIOLOGY. Rachel Rivera, MD Assistant Professor Infectious Diseases UT Southwestern Medical Center November 14, 2014

Dual Therapy: Symptoms and Screening:

Indirect Estimation of Chlamydia Screening Coverage Using Public Health Surveillance Data

Trends in HIV Incidence and Prevalence in the United States

2009 Minnesota Sexually Transmitted Disease Statistics

City and County of Denver Sexually Transmitted Infections Surveillance Report 2005

MARION COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT. Healthy people living and playing in healthy communities

Mortality Slide Series. National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention

Working Towards Addressing Women s Health Disparities in Arizona

ILI Syndromic Surveillance

David B. Johnson, STD Disparities Coordinator Division of STD Prevention National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, & TB Prevention November 13,

STIs in the Indian Country

Outline. AIDS & HIV in the Travis County. Global estimates for adults & children end HIV incidence worldwide

HIV Testing Survey, 2002

HIV and AIDS in the United States

8/3/2014. Objectives. Purpose of the Toolkit. Disclosure. Parts of the Toolkit

HIV/AIDS IN MINNESOTA

STD & HIV ANNUAL REPORT. An Annual Review of HIV and STD s reported in Oakland County, Michigan

HIV/AIDS IN NEVADA. Total Reported AIDS Cases i 4,972 5,461 4,665 5,000 4,420 4,116 4,000 3,000 2,249 2,502 2,654 2,000 2,032 2,094 1,000

Gender Disparities in Viral Suppression and Antiretroviral Therapy Use by Racial and Ethnic Group Medical Monitoring Project,

2015 Minnesota Sexually Transmitted Disease Statistics

Table of Contents. 2 P age. Susan G. Komen

26/09/2014. Types of Viral Hepatitis. Prevention of Viral Hepatitis as a Health Disparity for American Indians: Successes and Challenges

Women s Sexual Health: STI and HIV Screening. Barbara E. Wilgus, MSN, CRNP STD/HIV Prevention Training Center at Johns Hopkins

FULTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT RYAN WHITE PART A PROGRAM. Atlanta Eligible Metropolitan Area HIV/AIDS Unmet Need Estimate

National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB. Prevention: NCHHSTP. Division of Viral Hepatitis

ANNUAL TUBERCULOSIS REPORT OREGON Oregon Health Authority Public Health Division TB Program November 2012

STD UPDATE Patrick Loose, Chief HIV, STD & Hepatitis Branch February 15, 2018

HIV/AIDS and other Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs) in the Southern Region of the United States: Epidemiological Overview

Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part B Proposal Q & A

Enhanced Comprehensive HIV Prevention Planning (ECHPP) Project Overview

LOCAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND THE ROLE OF THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT

2017 EPIDEMIOLOGY REPORT

Tuberculosis Epidemiology

Looking to the Future in HIV Prevention:

Best Practices in STD Partner Management

HIV/AIDS IN WISCONSIN

STIs in Native American Populations: Changing the Story

The epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Asymptomatic Men. Background

TOBACCO USE AND ETHNICITY

Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Among Arizona Youth

STD, HIV and Hepatitis C 2017 Data Release. April 24,2018

Disparities in Vison Loss and Eye Health

Acknowledgments. For more information, contact:

Trends in U.S. HIV Diagnoses,

HIV/AIDS IN IDAHO. Total Reported AIDS Cases i. Living with AIDS Cumulative Cases

Epidemiology of HIV Among Women in Florida, Reported through 2014

HIV Surveillance in Urban and Nonurban Areas. National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD & TB Prevention Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention

HIV/AIDS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE

Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Surveillance Report, 2016

Unequal Treatment: Disparities in Access, Quality, and Care

HIV/AIDS IN GUAM. Total Reported AIDS Cases i. Living with AIDS Cumulative Cases

BALTIMORE COUNTY HIV/AIDS EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE Fourth Quarter Data reported throuh December 31, 2007

2014 TUBERCULOSIS FACT SHEET A Profile of Mecklenburg County Reported Cases

Arizona Annual Tuberculosis Surveillance Report

Leverage Exis,ng Resources with the Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Prevalence Monitoring Toolkit National Reproductive Health Conference Monday, August 4

Mapping of Sexually Transmitted Diseases to Optimize Intervention and Prevention Strategies

Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Hepatitis C and HIV Epidemiology in North Dakota

District of Columbia HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Annual Report 2007

Women s Health at Risk. A report on the status of women s health in New Jersey

HIV Infection in Alaska

Bassett Medical Center PPS Community Profile

PS : Comprehensive HIV Prevention Programs for Health Departments

Changing Patient Base. A Knowledge to Practice Program

Transcription:

Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Disparities: A National Perspective (anything else?) Catherine Lindsey Satterwhite Region IV IPP Meeting October 8, 29

Outline Disease burden and disparities Morbidity data IPP data Special analysis: Gonorrhea in IPP Gonorrhea screening thoughts Chlamydia Evaluation Initiative (CEI) Data, data, data

Chlamydia Rates by Sex: United States, 1988 28* Rate (per 1, population) 6 Men Women 48 Total 36 24 CT screening project (Region X) Program expansion 583.8* 211.1* 12 1988 9 92 94 96 98 2 2 4 6 Notifiable All 5 report Total cases reported in 28*: 1,21,523 * 28 data are preliminary (as of September, 29).

Chlamydia Rates by Race/Ethnicity: United States, 1998 28* Rate (per 1, population) 17 136 American Indian/AK Native Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White 1519.3* 12 68 34 173.6* 1998 99 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 * 28 data are preliminary (as of September, 29).

Chlamydia Rates by race/ethnicity and sex: United States, 27 Men Rate (per 1, population) Women 2 16 12 8 4 Race 4 8 12 16 2 293.8 AI/AN 1158.2 66.3 Asian/PI 28.8 841.3 Black 196. 211.7 Hispanic 753.3 71.9 White 249.3 19.4 Total 544.8

22 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Chlamydia Rates by Race and Sex: United States 21-28* 28* 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28* 2,56.9 928.8 264.4 79.4 White women White men Black women Black men * 28 data are preliminary (as of September, 29)

Chlamydia Median State-specific Positivity Among 15-24 Year-old Women Tested in Family Planning Clinics, 1997 28* Median state-specific positivity rate 1 8 6 5.1% 28*: 7.4 (3.1-15.) 4 (2.-11.2) 2 1997 98 99 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Note: As of 1997, all 1 Health and Human Services (HHS) regions, representing all 5 states, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas, reported chlamydia positivity data. SOURCE: Regional Infertility Prevention Projects; Office of Population Affairs; Local and State STD Control Programs; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Chlamydia Percent of tests that were nucleic acid amplification tests in family planning clinics among 15- to 24-year year-old women by HHS region, 23 27 27 Percent 1 8 6 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 Region I Percent 1 8 6 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 Region II Percent 1 8 6 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 Region III Percent 1 8 6 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 Region IV Percent 1 8 6 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 Region V Percent 1 8 6 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 Region VI Percent 1 8 6 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 Region VII Percent 1 8 6 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 Region VIII Percent 1 8 6 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 Region IX Percent 1 8 6 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 Region X SOURCE: Chlamydia Prevalence Monitoring Project (Regional Infertility Prevention Projects); Office of Population Affairs; Local and State STD Control Programs; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Chlamydia Prevalence Among Women and Men Aged 14-39 Years by Race/Ethnicity (NHANES), 1999-22 1 Prevalence (%) 8 6 4 2 7.2 5.3 3.1 3.1 1.5 1.5 Non-Hispanic White Non-Hispanic Black Mexican-American Females Males Source: Datta, Annals 27. NHANES=National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Racial Disparity in Adjusted Chlamydia Racial Disparity in Adjusted Chlamydia Prevalence Among Women, Aged 16 Prevalence Among Women, Aged 16-24 Years 24 Years % 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 J a n 6 M a r 6 M A y 6 J u l 6 S e p 6 N o v 6 J a n 7 M a r 7 M a y 7 J u l 7 S e p 7 N o v 7 J a n 8 M a r 8 M a y 8 J u l 8 S e p 8 N o v 8 Black White Disparity

% 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 J a n 4 M a r 4 M a y 4 J u l 4 S e p 4 N o v 4 J a n 5 M a r 5 M a y 5 J u l 5 S e p 5 N o v 5 J a n 6 M a r 6 M a y 6 J u l 6 S e p 6 N o v 6 J a n 7 M a r 7 M a y 7 J u l 7 S e p 7 N o v 7 J a n 8 M a r 8 M a y 8 J u l 8 S e p 4 N o v 4 Racial Disparity in Adjusted Chlamydia Racial Disparity in Adjusted Chlamydia Prevalence Among Men, Aged 16 Prevalence Among Men, Aged 16-24 Years 24 Years Black White Disparity

Gonorrhea Positivity among Women aged 15-24 years in the United States, 25-27 27 Linda Gorgos, Lori Newman, Catherine Satterwhite, Stuart Berman, Hillard Weinstock

Background GC rates vary widely by geography and among populations Limitations of case reporting data Limited data on GC positivity in screened populations GC prevalence data AddHealth Wave III: 2.1% (blacks) vs.1% (whites) NHANES 1999-26, women aged 14-25 years: 2.2% (blacks) vs..5% (whites)

Background Infertility Prevention Project provides for testing of chlamydia and gonorrhea across the U.S. Data elements collected vary by region Coordinated effort by CDC to standardize the data across all 1 HHS regions

Objectives Describe gonorrhea positivity among women aged 15-24 years attending Infertility Prevention Project family planning clinics Select a subset of these young women that most closely approximates a screened population Examine racial disparities Examine geographic distribution of disease

Methods Utilized standardized data across all 1 PHS Regions All gonorrhea tests among women aged 15-24 years tested in IPP family planning clinics from 25-27 27 Selected clinics where 9% of women being tested for CT also tested for GC at visit Clinic sent 5 GC tests per calendar year

Analysis Positivity = # of positive tests/ total # of tests Calculated gonorrhea positivity on state and county levels Compared positivity across age groups Compared positivity across race/ ethnicity Focused analysis on non-hispanic black vs. non - Hispanic white women

Gonorrhea Tests, ALL Males and Females, 25 27 Tests = 8,31,52 States = 42 plus D.C., P.R., V.I. Counties = 2145

Gonorrhea Tests, ALL Males and Females, 25 27 Tests = 8,31,52 States = 42 plus D.C., P.R., V.I. Counties = 2145 Gonorrhea Tests, Females aged 15 24 years seen in Family Planning Clinics, 25 27 Tests = 2,39,837 States = 42 plus D.C., P.R., V.I. Counties = 1968

Gonorrhea Tests, ALL Males and Females, 25 27 Tests = 8,31,52 States = 42 plus D.C., P.R., V.I. Counties = 2145 Gonorrhea Tests, Females aged 15 24 years seen in Family Planning Clinics, 25 27 Tests = 2,39,837 States = 42 plus D.C., P.R., V.I. Counties = 1968 Gonorrhea Tests, Females aged 15 24 years seen in Family Planning Selected Clinics Only, 25 27 Tests = 1,119,394 States = 26 Counties = 753

Distribution of Eligible Clinics Clinics =257 Tests = 423,367 Clinics = Tests = Clinics = 61 Clinics = 9 Tests = 94,55 Tests = 589,564

Characteristics of Participants Characteristic Number Percent Age Group (years) 15 19 487,121 44 % 2 24 632,273 56 % Race/ Ethnicity Non Hispanic White 616,879 56 % Non Hispanic Black 274,699 25 % Hispanic 14,593 13 % Asian/ PI/ NH 17,758 1.7 % American Indian/Alaska Native 2722.3 % Multirace, other, unknown 44,789 4.1 %

Gonorrhea Test Type Test Type Percent of GC Tests NAAT 8 % NA Hybridization 1 % Other 1 % Culture <.1 %

Characteristic Gonorrhea Positivity Year of Testing 25 1.45 % 26 1.66 % 27 1.67 % Age Group 15 19 years 1.94 % 2 24 years 1.32 % Race/ Ethnicity Non Hispanic Black 4.24 % AI/AN 1.25 % Asian/ PI/ NH.98 % Non Hispanic White.65 % Hispanic.59 % Total 1.59 %

State Specific Gonorrhea Positivity, Females aged 15 24 years seen in Selected Family Planning Clinics, 25 27 1.6. 1.9 1.3.6.8 1.3 1.4 1.3.7 2..2.4.8.8 1.2 2.2.7 2. 3.1.9 2.8 2.8 2.1.7 1.5 See * (n=24) < 1. % (n=11) 1. 1.9 % (n=8) 2. % (n=7) * Clinics that did not report gonorrhea positivity data or did not routinely screen 9% or more of the women aged 15 24 years for gonorrhea and send at least 5 gonorrhea tests per year

State Specific Gonorrhea Positivity, Females aged 15 24 years seen in Selected Family Planning Clinics, 25 27 1.6. 1.9 1.3.6.8 1.3 1.4 1.3.7 2..2.8 1.2.7.9 2.1 1.5 3.1 2.8 2.8.4.8 2.2 2..7 Median = 1.3 % (IQR.7 2.%) Range 3.1% * Clinics that did not report gonorrhea positivity data or did not routinely screen 9% or more of the women aged 15 24 years for gonorrhea and send at least 5 gonorrhea tests per year

State Specific Gonorrhea Positivity Age Median GC Positivity I.Q.R. Range 15 19 years 1.4%.9 2.6 % 3.8 % 2 24 years 1.1 %.6 1.4% 2.7 % 15 24 years 1.3 %.7 2. % 3.1 %

State Specific GC Positivity, Non Hispanic White Females aged 15 24 years seen in Selected Family Planning Clinics, 25 27.8..9.9.4.6.8.6.6.4.8.2.3.6.9.8.5.6.9.4 1.2.8.8.6 See * (n=24) < 1. % (n=25) 1. 1.9 % (n=1) 2. % (n=).3.4 * Clinics that did not report gonorrhea positivity data or did not routinely screen 9% or more of the women aged 15 24 years for gonorrhea and send at least 5 gonorrhea tests per year

State Specific GC Positivity, Non Hispanic Black Females aged 15 24 years seen in Selected Family Planning Clinics, 25 27 2.4 4.9 3.8 3.3 3.6 4.2 4.3 4.6 3.2 4.7 1.4.3 2.2 1.9 5.4 6.9 8.7 3.4 4.5 3.7 4.4 4.7 3.9 3.1 3.8 See * (n=25) < 1. % (n=1) 1. 1.9 % (n=2) 2. % (n=22) * Clinics that did not report gonorrhea positivity data or did not routinely screen 9% or more of the women aged 15 24 years for gonorrhea and send at least 5 gonorrhea tests per year

State-Specific Specific Positivity.8. 2.4.9 4.9.9.4.6.8.6.6.8.4.2 3.8 3.3 3.6 4.2 4.3 4.6 4.7 3.2 1.4.3.6.3.9.8.5.6.9.4 1.2.8.6.8.4.3 2.2 1.9 5.4 6.9 8.7 3.4 4.5 3.7 4.4 4.7 3.8 3.9 3.1 Non Hispanic White Non Hispanic Black Median.6 % 3.8 % I.Q.R..4.8 % 3.2 4.6 % Range 1.2 %.3 8.7 %

Concentration of GC Morbidity Non-Hispanic black women represent 25% of the study population but account for 65% of total GC cases 16 of 753 (2%) counties account for 25 % of all GC cases 57 of 753 (8%) counties account for 5 % of all GC cases

Gonorrhea Positivity by County, non Hispanic White Females aged 15 24 years seen in selected Family Planning Clinics, 25 27 See * (n=2388) < 1. % (n=626) 1. 1.9% (n=98) 2. % (n=29) Counties that did not report gonorrhea positivity data or did not routinely screen 9% or more of the women aged 15 24 years for gonorrhea and send at least 5 gonorrhea tests per year

Gonorrhea Positivity by County, non Hispanic Black Females aged 15 24 years seen in selected family Planning Clinics, 25 27 See * (n=2437) < 1. % (n=233) 1. 1.9% (n=62) 2. % (n=49) Counties that did not report gonorrhea positivity data or did not routinely screen 9% or more of the women aged 15 24 years for gonorrhea and send at least 5 gonorrhea tests per year

County Level Positivity GC Positivity Non Hispanic White Non Hispanic Black % of Counties % of Counties < 1.% 83 % 33 % 1. 1.9 % 13 % 9 % 2. % 4 % 58 %

Ratio of Gonorrhea Positivity by County, non Hispanic Black/ non Hispanic White Females aged 15 24 years seen in selected Family Planning Clinics, 25 27 Positivity Ratio % of Counties 1. 3 % See * (n=2838) 1. (n=9) 1.1 2. (n=16) > 2. (n=278) 1.1 2. 5 % 2. 92 %

Summary GC positivity among young women varies by age, geographic area, and race/ ethnicity Younger women and minority populations disproportionately affected Large proportion of morbidity concentrated in a relatively small number of counties Racial disparities large and present across multiple geographic regions

Strengths Extends previous analysis of IPP GC data Majority of testing using NAAT technology Selection of clinics demonstrating consistent GC testing practices over all 3 years First step of using standardized data base to examine national level data Reproducible method Ability to examine time trends in future

Limitations Source data limited to IPP May not be representative of all young women Limited geographic representation across U.S. No data on extent of coverage of screening among women Need better understanding of who is being screened No data on risk factors Potential repeat testing of the same woman

Future Directions Additional calendar years of data will allow examination of time trends Valuable resource for GC data Informative for IPP planning and other national initiatives Draw attention to geographic areas and populations to focus prevention and service efforts potential for an impact!

Selection Criteria % of Cases Found % of Women Screened Positivity in Screened Positivity in Unscreened

Selection Criteria % of Cases Found % of Women Screened Positivity in Screened Positivity in Unscreened Age < 2 years 53 % 43 % 1.95 % 1.32 %

Selection Criteria % of Cases Found % of Women Screened Positivity in Screened Positivity in Unscreened Age < 2 years 53 % 43 % 1.95 % 1.32 % Non Hispanic Black 67 % 25 % 4.24 %.71 %

Selection Criteria % of Cases Found % of Women Screened Positivity in Screened Positivity in Unscreened Age < 2 years 53 % 43 % 1.95 % 1.32 % Non Hispanic Black 67 % 25 % 4.24 %.71 % Non Hispanic Black OR Age < 2 years 84 % 58 % 2.32 %.6 %

Selection Criteria % of Cases Found % of Women Screened Positivity in Screened Positivity in Unscreened Age < 2 years 53 % 43 % 1.95 % 1.32 % Non Hispanic Black 67 % 25 % 4.24 %.71 % Non Hispanic Black OR Age < 2 years 84 % 58 % 2.32 %.6 % Facility Positivity 1 % 89 % 6 % 2.34 %.45 %

Selection Criteria % of Cases Found % of Women Screened Positivity in Screened Positivity in Unscreened Age < 2 years 53 % 43 % 1.95 % 1.32 % Non Hispanic Black 67 % 25 % 4.24 %.71 % Non Hispanic Black OR Age < 2 years 84 % 58 % 2.32 %.6 % Facility Positivity 1 % 89 % 6 % 2.34 %.45 % Facility Positivity 1% OR Non Hispanic Black 92 % 63 % 2.33 %.35 %

Chlamydia Evaluation Initiative (CEI) Optional component to CSPS (FY 29) Purpose: Develop novel methodology to estimate community levels of: 1. Chlamydia screening coverage among sexually- active women aged <26 years 2. Partner treatment coverage among partners of chlamydia-infected infected women Calculate baseline coverage rates

CEI Applications 19 applications received All included chlamydia screening coverage 8 applications funded (full or partially): California, Illinois, Los Angeles, Michigan, Puerto Rico, San Francisco, Washington State, New York City Funding: September 29 Partner treatment coverage activities not funded

CEI Activities Use existing data in novel ways to generate estimates of chlamydia screening coverage Behavioral surveys (sexual activity) Healthcare seeking/access surveys Prevalence/positivity sources Partner with labs Validate self-reported testing history Collaboration between grantees?

Data, Data, Data Opportunistic New methodologies for using IPP data for surveillance purposes Enhanced data availability Data release policy pending Recognized as an important component to national chlamydia surveillance portfolio Keep it coming!

Reported number of tests* (IPP), by year 3,6, 3,4, 3,2, 3,, 2,8, 2,6, 2,4, 2,2, 2,, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 *Gonorrhea and chlamydia; positive and negative results only.

3,, 2,5, 2,, 1,5, 1,, Reported number of tests* (IPP), 5, by year and sex 25 26 27 28 Female Male *Gonorrhea and chlamydia; positive and negative results only.

4,, 3,5, 3,, 2,5, 2,, 1,5, 1,, Reported number of tests* (IPP), 5, by region and year 25 26 27 28 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X *Gonorrhea and chlamydia; positive and negative results only.

Reported tests* (IPP), by year and age group 1% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% >39 3-39 26-29 2-25 15-19 <15 1% % 22 23 24 25 *Gonorrhea and chlamydia; positive and negative results only.

Reported chlamydia tests* among women aged 15-24 years attending family planning clinics (IPP), by year 1% 8% 6% 4% 15-24 FP Women Other 2% % 25 26 27 28 *Positive and negative results only.

Thanks!