Using of S100A9 as a Novel Biomarker for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer, A Stool Based Study in Iraq

Similar documents
Study of expression of P53 in Gastric Carcinoma As a prognostic indicator

Cancers of unknown primary : Knowing the unknown. Prof. Ahmed Hossain Professor of Medicine SSMC

Biochemistry of Carcinogenesis. Lecture # 35 Alexander N. Koval

Genetic Testing: When should it be ordered? Julie Schloemer, MD Dermatology

VENTANA MMR IHC Panel Interpretation Guide for Staining of Colorectal Tissue

Disclosures. Outline. What IS tumor budding?? Tumor Budding in Colorectal Carcinoma: What, Why, and How. I have nothing to disclose

Research Article Stromal Expression of CD10 in Invasive Breast Carcinoma and Its Correlation with ER, PR, HER2-neu, and Ki67

Commonly Encountered Neuro-Endocrine Tumors of the Gut

Colonic Polyp. Najmeh Aletaha. MD

Test Bank for Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease 9th Edition by Kumar

Expression and Significance of GRP78 and HER-2 in Colorectal Cancer

Development of Carcinoma Pathways

Molecular Testing Updates. Karen Rasmussen, PhD, FACMG Clinical Molecular Genetics Spectrum Medical Group, Pathology Division Portland, Maine

The Role of CCR9 and Melanoma Metastasis to Small Intestine. Farin Amersi, MD Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center Cedar Sinai Medical Center

Test Bank for Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease 9th Edition by Kumar

Androgen Receptor Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A New Actionable Target?

CHAPTER 7 Concluding remarks and implications for further research

High expression of fibroblast activation protein is an adverse prognosticator in gastric cancer.

Characterization and significance of MUC1 and c-myc expression in elderly patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma

Detection of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) gene in Non-Small Cell lung Cancer (NSCLC) By CISH Technique

BIOLOGY OF CANCER. Definition: Cancer. Why is it Important to Understand the Biology of Cancer? Regulation of the Cell Cycle 2/13/2015

NPQR Quality Payment Program (QPP) Measures 21_18247_LS.

Higher expression of deoxyuridine triphosphatase (dutpase) may predict the metastasis potential of colorectal cancer

Please Silence Your Cell Phones. Thank You

LN04 - Lymphoma Tissue Microarray

Citation for published version (APA): Bleeker, W. A. (2001). Therapeutic considerations in Dukes C colon cancer s.n.

Neoplasia 2018 lecture 11. Dr H Awad FRCPath

WHAT SHOULD WE DO WITH TUMOUR BUDDING IN EARLY COLORECTAL CANCER?

Title: Synuclein Gamma Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome in Colon Cancer with Normal Levels of Carcinoembryonic Antigen

Original Article CREPT expression correlates with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma histological grade and clinical outcome

Expression and clinical significance of ADAM17 protein in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Clinical significance of CD44 expression in children with hepatoblastoma

Colorectal adenocarcinoma leading cancer in developed countries In US, annual deaths due to colorectal adenocarcinoma 57,000.

Question: If in a particular case, there is doubt about the correct T, N or M category, what do you do?

Dr Rodney Itaki Lecturer Anatomical Pathology Discipline. University of Papua New Guinea School of Medicine & Health Sciences Division of Pathology

8. The polyp in the illustration can be described as (circle all that apply) a. Exophytic b. Pedunculated c. Sessile d. Frank

Claudin-4 Expression in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Correlation with Androgen Receptors and Ki-67 Expression

Molecular markers in colorectal cancer. Wolfram Jochum

Update on Colorectal Cancer: Integrating the Host Immune Response 3 rd Emirates Surgical Pathology Conference 15 December 2017 Dubai, UAE

Correlation Between GATA-3, Ki67 and p53 Expressions to Histopathology Grading of Breast Cancer in Makassar, Indonesia

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY...

Current Status of Biomarkers (including DNA Tumor Markers and Immunohistochemistry in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Tumors)

Predictive Assays in Radiation Therapy

3/9/2017. Chapter 56. Care of the Patient with Cancer. Cancer Rates in the US. Carcinogenesis

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression in Oral Epithelial Dysplasia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Gastric Carcinoma with Lymphoid Stroma: Association with Epstein Virus Genome demonstrated by PCR

Inti Zlobec 1*, Viktor H Koelzer 1,2, Heather Dawson 1,2, Aurel Perren 1,2 and Alessandro Lugli 1,2

Colorectal cancer Chapelle, J Clin Oncol, 2010

PROTOCOL SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY (NON OPERATIVE) BREAST CANCER - PATHOLOGY ASSESSMENT

Corporate Medical Policy

Colorectal Cancer Screening

Implications of Progesterone Receptor Status for the Biology and Prognosis of Breast Cancers

Validation of QClamp as Next Generation Liquid Biopsy Technique for Colorectal Cancer He James Zhu M.D. Ph.D

microrna Presented for: Presented by: Date:

Esophageal seeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of a mediastinal tumor

Primary enteric adenocarcinoma with predominantly signet ring features of the lung: A case report with clinicopathological and molecular findings

colorectal cancer Colorectal cancer hereditary sporadic Familial 1/12/2018

Prosigna BREAST CANCER PROGNOSTIC GENE SIGNATURE ASSAY

Prosigna BREAST CANCER PROGNOSTIC GENE SIGNATURE ASSAY

Targeting the cgmp Pathway to Treat Colorectal Cancer

Dr. dr. Primariadewi R, SpPA(K)

Comparison of CD10 expression in stroma of epithelial and mesenchymal tumors of the breast

Immunohistochemical Expression Of Cytokeratin 8 And 18 In Breast Carcinoma.

Short and longterm outcomes after endoscopic resection of malignant polyps.

Update on Exact Sciences Molecular CRC Screening Test. November 16 th, 2011

2(iii): Prognostic biomarkers 2(iv): Biomarkers based on Cancer Types

Impact of Prognostic Factors

What Pathology can tell us in the approach of localized colorectal cancer

Study on the expression of MMP-9 and NF-κB proteins in epithelial ovarian cancer tissue and their clinical value

COLORECTAL PATHWAY GROUP, MANCHESTER CANCER. Guidelines for the assessment of mismatch. Colorectal Cancer

The Significance Of Angiogenesis in the Biological Behavior of Colorectal Carcinoma and its Metastatic Lymph Nodes Using CD34 Antibody

Overview of Cancer. Mylene Freires Advanced Nurse Practitioner, Haematology

TUMOR M ARKERS MARKERS

Lecture 1: Carcinogenesis

COLORECTAL PATHWAY GROUP, MANCHESTER CANCER. Guidelines for the assessment of mismatch. Colorectal Cancer

COLORECTAL CANCER FAISALGHANISIDDIQUI MBBS; FCPS; PGDIP-BIOETHICS; MCPS-HPE

Her-2/neu expression and its correlation with ER status and various clinicopathological parameters

Caring for a Patient with Colorectal Cancer. Objectives. Poll question. UNC Cancer Network Presented on 10/15/18. For Educational Use Only 1

American Journals of Cancer Case Reports. A Rare Case of Rectal Metastasis from Sarcomatoid Variant of Urothelial Carcinoma: A Case Report

SSM signature genes are highly expressed in residual scar tissues after preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer.

Prognostic significance of nemo like kinase in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

MDJ The Role of K-Ras and PI3Kcb Expression in Oral Vol.:10 No.:2 2013

AllinaHealthSystems 1

[A RESEARCH COORDINATOR S GUIDE]

Cancer and Oncogenes Bioscience in the 21 st Century. Linda Lowe-Krentz

The diagnostic and prognostic value of genetic aberrations in resectable distal bile duct cancer Rijken, A.M.

DOCTORAL THESIS SUMMARY

ExpressArt FFPE Clear RNAready kit

Colon cancer: practical molecular diagnostics. Wade S. Samowitz, M.D. University of Utah and ARUP

Metastatic mechanism of spermatic cord tumor from stomach cancer

Correlation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression and Neovascularization with Colorectal Carcinoma: A Pilot Study

HISTOPATHOLOGY. Introduction

ANATOMICAL PATHOLOGY TARIFF

TITLE: The Role of hcdc4 as a Tumor Suppressor Gene in Genomic Instability Underlying Prostate Cancer

EMR, ESD and Beyond. Peter Draganov MD. Professor of Medicine Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition University of Florida

P16 GENE EXPRESSION IN OVARIAN EPITHELIAL CYSTADENOCARCINOMA

Original Article ABSTRACT. Ban J. Qasim, Hussam H. Ali, Alaa G. Hussein

Prospective Clinical Study of Circulating Tumor Cells For Colorectal Cancer Screening

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: What`s hot

DOCTORAL THESIS SUMMARY

Transcription:

ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 4 Number 10 (2015) pp. 138-145 http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article Using of S100A9 as a Novel Biomarker for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer, A Stool Based Study in Iraq Haider Sabah Kadhim 1, Ahmed A Hussein 2, Dalya B. Hanna 3*, Zahraa Q Ali 2 and Riaydh Z Asmer 5 1 College of Medicine/Al-Nahrain University, Iraq 2 College of Medicine/Baghdad University, Iraq 3 College of Pharmacy/ University of Mustansiriyah, Iraq 4 Gastroenterology & Hepatology Hospital/ Baghdad, Iraq *Corresponding author A B S T R A C T K e y w o r d s Novel biomarker, Colorectal cancer, Histopathological diagnosis Until now, the precise etiology of colorectal cancer (CRC) is not yet known. However, it is widely agreed that CRC develops slowly via a progressive accumulation of genetic mutations and involves inactivation of a variety of tumorsuppressor and DNA repair genes, with simultaneous activation of certain oncogenes due to long possible list of environmental factors. A total of 60 patients (22 were males and 38 were females) were involved in this study, they were divided according to histopathological diagnosis to three groups, colorectal cancer group, polyp group, and normal colonoscopy group. Samples from patients were selected between May 2012 and August 2014. From each patient enrolled in this study, 2 4 mucosal punch biopsies were taken for histopathology and immunohistochemistry and stool samples were taken and kept in RPMI (Rosewell Park Memorial Institute) medium, to be used in flow cytometry. Statistical analysis of the results showed that there was a significant difference in the positivity rate of S100A9 in histopathology sections and in the stool specimens of the three studied groups. The selected marker, S100A9 in histopathology specimens and in stool samples qualified as significant predictors or risk factors for having malignant CRC compared to healthy controls. While there was no significant difference regarding S100A9 expression as a risk factor between malignant tissues and non neoplastic polyp. And S100A9 in stool samples qualified as significant predictors or risk factors for having malignant CRC compared to healthy controls and non neoplastic polyp. In this study S100A9 showed to be a significant predictor for having CRC in both tissue and stool. Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) is considered one of the commonest malignant epithelial tumor of the colon or rectum (Imamura et al., 2014) Colorectal cancer initiates in the epithelial cells lining the colon and rectum. The high rate replication of the epithelial cells of the human colon with 10 10 epithelial cells being replaced every day is thought to 138

contribute to the vulnerability of colon and rectal epithelium to mutation and consequent carcinogenesis (Komarova, 2005), and many more patients annually suffer morbidity from curative colon cancer surgery and chemotherapy (Win et al., 2013). Both environmental and genetic factors play the main roles in its etiology (Qiu et al., 2012). It is worldwide agreed that accumulation of genetic mutations and epimutations alteration in colonic mucosal cells ultimately leads to cell proliferation and metastasis (Robbins, 2012; Edwards et al., 2012). There is increasing evidence that altered expression of S100 family members is seen in many cancers including breast, lung, bladder, kidney, thyroid, gastric, prostate and oral cancers. S100 proteins are commonly up-regulated in tumors and this is often associated with tumor progression. In contrast S100A9 also known as S100 calcium-binding protein A9 and S100A2, S100A11 have been documented as tumor suppressors in some cancers but as tumor promoters in others (Hibi et al., 2011). This demonstrates the complexity of the family and variability of their functions. Although the precise roles of these proteins in cancer is still to be discovered many of the family are associated with promoting metastases through interactions with matrix metalloproteinases or by acting as chemoattractants. There is also evidence that some members can regulate transcription factors such as p53 (Prix et al., 2002; Khoshbaten et al., 2014). Patients and methods Patients were selected from those attending the Endoscopic Unit at "Gastroenterology and Hepatology Teaching Hospital/ Baghdad Medical City", Oncology Teaching Hospital/ Baghdad Medical City- Health Directorate, and from the Endoscopic Unit of Baghdad Medical City. A total of 60 patients (22 were males and 38 were females) were involved in this study (Table 1), they were divided according to histopathological diagnosis to three groups, colorectal cancer group, polyp group, and normal colonoscopy group (Table 2). Samples from patients were selected between May 2012 and August 2014. From each patient, 2 4 mucosal punch biopsies were taken via sterile standard biopsy forceps and fixed immediately with 10% buffered neutral formalin for preparation of paraffin embedded tissue blocks for histopathology and immunohistochemistry, and stool samples were taken prior to start the preparation for the procedure, or the day the patients would come to take the histopathological report. Patients also advised to keep the samples frozen. One of the containers was containing RPMI (Rosewell Park Memorial Institute) medium, to be used in flow cytometry. Histopathological and immunohistochemical study Two sections of 6 micrometers thickness were taken from each paraffin embedded tissue block. First sections were put on ordinary slide for Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining to confirm diagnosis and the second sections were put on the charged slide for immunohistochemistry (IHC) using EXPOSE Mouse and Rabbit Specific HRP/DAB Detection IHC kit (ab80436/ Abcam-UK) and Anti-S100A9 antibody [EPR3556] ab92468 to detect the expression of S100A9 in colonic tissue samples. Human tonsil lysate and peripheral blood leukocyte cell lysate IHC-P: Human spleen tissue was used as a positive control. 139

DNA extraction and purification from stool samples Stool samples typically contain many compounds that can degrade DNA and inhibit downstream enzymatic reactions. This obstacle was overcome by using (QIAamp DNA purification from stool samples)* which is designated for rapid purification of total DNA from stool, and it was suitable for both fresh and frozen samples. The fast and easy procedures comprised the following steps: Lysis of stool samples in Buffer ASL. Adsorption of impurities to inhibit EX matrix. Purification of DNA on QIAamp Mini spin columns. Determination of Concentration, Yield, and Purity of DNA*: DNA yielded were determined from the concentration of the DNA eluted, and was measured by absorbance at 260 nm, by using of Nanodrop. Purity was determined by calculating the ratio of absorbance at 260 nm to the absorbance at 280 nm. Pure DNA has an A260/A280 ratio of 1.7-1.9. Flow cytometry for S100A S100A9 was present in the form of a secreted protein. The detection of any secreted proteins is difficult as the protein will be released from the cell before detection, or may degrade rapidly. Hence, it recommended using Brefaldin A (or other compounds) as a Golgi-Block, where cells were incubated with Brefaldin A which prevents proteins being released from the Golgi. Thereby any cells would expressing the protein can then be detected. We used Brefeldin A [Brefeldin A Solution (1,000X) ab193369] to this purpose. Primary antibody for S100A9 used for Flow cytometry was from abcam with cat. No. [ab112228]. Anti-S100A9 antibody [CF- 557] was used and the human peripheral blood leukocytes were used as positive control. Results and Discussion Difference in positivity rate of tested genes between study groups: Histopathology sections The difference was statistically significant in the positivity rate of S100A9 in histopathology sections of the three studied groups (malignant CRC cases, nonneoplastic polyps, and negative apparently healthy controls), (Table 3), (Figure 1). And the results showed that there was no significant difference in the expression of S100A9 in histopathological section between studied groups (Table 4). Stool specimens The positivity rate of S100A9 selected gene was assessed in stool specimens in the three studied groups (malignant CRC cases, nonneoplastic polyps, and negative apparently healthy controls). The result showed that the difference was statistically significant, (Table 3). Genes as risk factors for malignancy compared to healthy controls Histopathology sections The selected marker, S100A9 in histopathology specimens qualified as significant predictors or risk factors for 140

having malignant CRC compared to healthy controls. S100A9 remained statistically significant after adjusting for the inflated level of significance attributed to multiple (repeated) significance testing on the same group. The risk of having CRC is increased by 37.1 times in the presence of S100A9. This gene is responsible for around 50% of etiologic fraction for having malignancy (compared to healthy controls) (Table 4). Stool specimens The selected marker, S100A9 gene in stool specimens qualified as significant predictors or risk factors for having CRC compared to healthy controls. This risky gene remained statistically significant even after adjusting for the inflated level of significance attributed to multiple (repeated) significance testing on the same group. The risk of having CRC is increased by 37.1 times in the presence of S100A9 genes respectively. S100A9 gene was responsible for a high proportion of the total risk for having malignancy (compared to healthy controls), ranging between 58 to 74% of etiologic fraction (Table 4). Genes as risk factors for malignancy compared to non-neoplastic polyp Histopathology sections Although a positive S100A9 gene in histopathology specimen increases the risk of having CRC by 4.5 times compared to non-neoplastic polyp, the calculated risk estimate failed short of statistical significance, possibly because of small sample size. This gene was responsible for 46.7% of total risk for having malignancy as opposed to non-malignant polyp. Stool specimens S100A9 tested gene in stool specimens qualified as significant predictors or risk factors for having malignant CRC compared to non-neoplastic polyp. This gene remained statistically significant after adjusting for the inflated level of significance attributed to multiple (repeated) significance testing on the same group. The risk of having CRC is increased by 25.2 times in the presence of S100A9, which is responsible for around 60% of etiologic fraction for having malignancy as opposed to non-neoplastic polyp. Gene expression in tumorous tissue versus stool specimens among cases with colorectal cancer The expression of S100A9 in biopsy material obtained from tumorous tissue was compared to stool specimens obtained from cases with colonic cancer. Each histologic specimen was paired with a stool sample obtained from the same patient. S100A9 showed an exactly equivocal tendency to be expressed in histologic specimens and stool samples. This tendency was however not significant statistically, as detailed in table 6. Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies affecting both sexes and a common cause of mortality worldwide. The present findings, along with earlier studies, show that S100A8/A9 function at multiple stages in disease progression. S100A8/A9, their receptors and signaling pathways therefore provide important targets for development of pharmacological interventions and for the identification of early-stage disease biomarkers (Mie Ichikawae et al., 2011). 141

The inconsistent association of S100A expression with clinicopathological features and patient prognosis among cancers may be caused by the complexity of the cancer microenvironment. In the current study, unexpected results regarding S100A9 were obtained. When comparing the difference in expression rate among the study groups (CRC, nonneoplastic polyp, normal colonic tissue), this biomarker showed the same (60%) expression in CRC of tissue and stool samples and, (25%) in contrast to (0%) in non- neoplastic polyp samples in both tissue and stool samples respectively. In colorectal carcinoma, tumoral tissues infiltrate with various immune/inflammatory cells along their invasive margins, and the increased S100A8/A9 expression in these immune cells infiltrating the tumor has been demonstrated by certain studies. In addition, several studies have suggested that increased S100A8/A9 expression in colorectal carcinoma may play a role in tumor progression and may be associated with metastasis and histological grade. Although a few studies imply a possible relationship with tumor progression and metastasis, there is no clear correlation between increased expression of S100A8/A9 in colorectal cancer and clinicopathological parameters such as tumor progression, tumor stage, lymph node metastases, or distant metastases (Cumhur brahim Ba sorgun et al., 2014). On the other hand, when applying other statistical analyses to this biomarker, it showed to be a significant predictor for having CRC in both tissue and stool. When comparing CRC to normal and more, it had 37.1 times to have the tendency to be expressed in CRC on the count of normal tissue samples, which was the same result when comparing the same two groups but using stool samples, making it a significant predictor for CRC. Moreover, even after adjusted for the effect of multiple comparisons, S100A9 showed 25.2 times significantly higher in CRC more than non- neoplastic polyp when using stool samples. Still, the S100A9 showed significant higher tendency to be expressed by 12 times (60%) more in tumor tissue rather than in the normal adjacent one of the same patient. More interestingly, it showed no association to the family history, sex, or age. Although it is a fact that this is the first local study dealing with S100A9, and more, in its presence in stool of CRC patients, but, it is also a fact that we lost the privilege in using the local related data to explain the results. Table.1 Represents sex allotment Sex CRC (%) Polyp (%) Normal (%) Total Female 28 5 5 38 Male 12 3 7 22 Total 40 8 12 60 142

Table.2 Patient's categorization Group Endoscopy finding Number of patients I Tumor * (CRC) 40 II Polyp 12 III Normal colonoscopy 8 Total 60 *CRC- Colorectal Cancer/ proved according to histopathological report Table.3 The difference in histopathology (affected tissue) and in stool specimens positivity rate of S100A9 between the 3 study groups Positive gene-stool S100A9- affected tissue S100A9- stool Studied groups (apparently healthy) controls (n=12) polyp controls (non-neoplastic) (n=8) Malignant cases (CRC) (n=40) P(Chisquare test) N % N % N % 0 0.0 2 25.0 24 60.0 <0.001 0 0.0 0 0.0 24 60.0 Positive gene Table.4 The histopathology (affected tissue) specimens positivity rate of S100A9 by gender among cases with malignant CRC Gender Female (n=28) Male (n=12) P (Chisquare) Positive gene-affected tissue N % N % S100A9 17 60.7 7 58.3 1[NS] Table.5 The risk of having CRC compared to healthy controls for S100A9 identified in histopathology (affected tissue) and stool specimens Negative (apparently healthy) controls (n=12) Malignant cases (CRC) (n=40 OR Inverse OR EF PF Fisher's exact Adjusted P N % N % S100A9-0 0.0 24 60.0 37.1 ** 0.584 ** <0.001 0.002 affected tissue S100A9-stool 0 0.0 24 60.0 37.1 ** 0.584 ** <0.001 0.002 143

Positive gene S100A9- affected tissue S100A9- stool Negative (apparently healthy) controls (n=12) Malignant cases (CRC) (n=40 OR Inverse OR N % N % 2 25.0 24 60.0 4.5 ** 0.46 7 0 0.0 24 60.0 25.2 ** 0.57 6 EF PF Fisher's exact ** 0.064 Adjusted P ** 0.002 0.021 Table.6 Comparing the performance of selected tests in histopathologic specimens for affected tissue (tumor) compared to stool exam among cases with malignancy (CRC) Same marker-stool exam S100A9 affected tissue(pathological) Negative Positive Total N % N % N % Negative 14 87.5 2 12.5 16 100 Positive 2 8.3 22 91.7 24 100 Total 16 40 24 60 40 100 There is a equal tendency for examined stool to be positive compared to affected tissue Positivity rate for affected (tumor) tissue= 60% Positivity rate for stool=60% P (McNemar) =1 [NS] (not significant) Figure.1 Diffused expression of S100A9 mab in Colon cancer tissue. Formalin fixed, Paraffin embedded 144

The tumor microenvironment plays an important role in modulating tumor progression. It has been suggested that calcium ions play a significant role in the development of colorectal carcinoma through a direct impact on proliferation and differentiation via calcium receptors. For this reason, increased expression of calciumbinding proteins S100A8 and A9, members of the S-100 protein family, in the peritumoral and intratumoral spaces in colorectal carcinoma becomes important for tumor progression. Therefore, the analyses conducted on the expression of these proteins and tumor behavior suggests that S100A8/A9 can become potential therapeutic targets in cancer treatment (El- Rifai et al., 2002). So far, a limited number of studies have reported correlation between increased expression of S100A8/A9 and parameters such as tumor differentiation, metastasis, tumor size, and Dukes stage (Cumhur brahim Ba sorgun et al., 2014). However, further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to substantiate the results of this study and to better understand the functions of the S100A8/A9 positive immune cells observed in the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. In conclusion, S100A9 was served as a good test to diagnose CRC differentiating it from non- neoplastic polyp using stool samples. And it is the positive gene that served as a good test to diagnose CRC differentiating it apparently healthy controls using stool samples. Reference Cumhur brahim Ba sorgun, Betül Ünal, Nuray Erin, An l Özlük, Özlem Ceren Uzun, Gülsüm Özlem Elpek, 2014. S100A8 and S100A9 positive cells in colorectal carcinoma: clinicopathological analysis. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract., 145 2014: 6. Edwards, M.S., et al. 2012. A systematic review of treatment guidelines for metastatic colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis., 14(2): e31 47. El-Rifai, C.. Moskaluk, M.. Abdrabbo, K., et al. 2002. Gastric cancers overexpress S100A calcium-binding proteins. Cancer Res., 62(23): 6823 6826. Hibi, K., et al. 2011. Detection of TFPI2 methylation in the serum of gastric cancer patients. Anticancer Res., 31(11): 3835 3838. Imamura, Y., et al. 2014. Analyses of clinicopathological, molecular, and prognostic associations of KRAS codon 61 and codon 146 mutations in colorectal cancer: cohort study and literature review. Mol. Cancer, 13: 135. Khoshbaten, M., et al. 2014. Diagnostic value of fecal calprotectin as a screening biomarker for gastrointestinal malignancies. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 15(4): 1667 1670. Komarova, N.L. 2005. Cancer, aging and the optimal tissue design. Semin Cancer Biol., 15: 494 505. Mie Ichikawa, Roy Williams, Ling Wang, Thomas Vogl, Geetha Srikrishna, 2011. S100A8/A9 activate key genes and pathways in colon tumor progression. Mol. Cancer Res., 9(2): 133 148. Prix, L., et al. 2002. Diagnostic biochip array for fast and sensitive detection of K-ras mutations in stool. Clin. Chem., 48(3): 428 435. Qiu, R., et al. 2012. Large conformational changes in MutS during DNA scanning, mismatch recognition and repair signalling. EMBO J., 31(11): 2528 2540. Robbins, 2012. Cell injury, cell death, and adaptations. In: Kumar, V., Abbas, A.K., Aster, J.C. (Eds.), Robbins basic athology. Elsevier, Philadelphia. Pp. 1 28. Win, A.K., et al. 2013. Criteria and prediction models for mismatch repair gene mutations: a review. J. Med. Genetics, 50(12): 785 793.