Service Delivery Guide for Educating Students Who Are Deaf and Low Functioning

Similar documents
TExES Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (181) Test at a Glance

Hearing Impaired K 12

Informal Functional Hearing Evaluation (IFHE)

Informal Functional Hearing Evaluation (IFHE)

Chapter 3 - Deaf-Blindness

Low Incidence Guidelines

OHIO ASSESSMENTS FOR EDUCATORS (OAE) FIELD 044: SPECIAL EDUCATION SPECIALIST: DEAF/HARD OF HEARING

ILLINOIS LICENSURE TESTING SYSTEM

Staff Development Day 2013

Category Communication Deaf/Hard of Hearing

Informal Functional Hearing Evaluation (IFHE)

Concept & Language Development in Young Children who are Deaf/Hard of Hearing or Visually Impaired

CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS WHO ARE: DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING

IResearch Report. The Importance of Shared Communication Forms

Areas to Address with All Families

Deaf-Blind Census. Instructions, Definitions, and Reporting Materials

New Mexico TEAM Professional Development Module: Deaf-blindness

MAINSTREAM TEACHER OF THE DEAF

Auditorily Impaired / Visually Impaired. Memorandum of Understanding. between the Interagency Council on Early Childhood Intervention (ECI)

I. Language and Communication Needs

Getting Started with AAC

There are often questions and, sometimes, confusion when looking at services to a child who is deaf or hard of hearing. Because very young children

Implementing the Language Assessment Program for Children who are Deaf/Hard of Hearing

When neurotypical children look at peoples faces, regions in the limbic system light up with endorphins and reward that child.

Evaluating Language and Communication Skills

SUBCHAPTER I. PROGRAMS FOR STUDENTS WHO ARE DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING. Sec DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter:

Developing an Effective IEP for Children with Deaf-Blindness: A Parent Mini-Guide

COMPETENCY REVIEW GUIDE OFFICE OF EDUCATOR LICENSURE. How to Satisfy and Document Subject Matter Knowledge Competency Review Requirements

Important ADA Policy Guidance on Effective Communication

Informal Functional Hearing Evaluation for Students with DeafBlindness

Section I - Consider the Student's Language and Communication

Parents Guide for the identification of children

Principal, Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program Class Code: 1450 Work Days: 220

Collaborative Success for Students Who are Deaf/Hard of Hearing

Classroom Accommodations for Students Who Are Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing

Regional Day School Program for the Deaf (RDSPD) Administrative Guidelines

OFFICE OF EDUCATOR LICENSURE SUBJECT MATTER KNOWLEDGE. The Competency Review Made Simple

FOUNDATIONS FOR LITERACY: AN EARLY LITERACY INTERVENTION FOR DHH CHILDREN

Communication and ASD: Key Concepts for Educational Teams

A PARENT S GUIDE TO DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING EARLY INTERVENTION RECOMMENDATIONS

Intensive Training. Early Childhood Intensive Training K-12 Intensive Training Building Your Future Intensive Training

TEACHERS OF STUDENTS WHO ARE DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING:

INTERVENERS IN THE HOME AND COMMUNITY: AN UNDER-RECOGNIZED IMPERATIVE HOME AND COMMUNITY INTERVENER WORKGROUP

It is also possible to have a mixed hearing loss, which arises from both the above.

The Evaluation of Children with Deaf-Blindness: A Parent Mini-Guide

Date: April 19, 2017 Name of Product: Cisco Spark Board Contact for more information:

College of Education and Human Services Exceptional Student & Deaf Education Course Descriptions

to the child and the family, based on the child's and family's abilities and needs. The IFSP needs to address the communication needs of the child and

IMPROVING EARLY COMMUNICATION OUTCOMES FOR TODDLERS WITH DOWN SYNDROME

Characteristics of the Text Genre Nonfi ction Text Structure Three to eight lines of text in the same position on each page

Appendix C: Protocol for the Use of the Scribe Accommodation and for Transcribing Student Responses

Coordinated Family Services Plan

Child AAC Intake Form

PEIMS Reporting for the Regional Day School Program for the Deaf (RDSPD)

Note: This document describes normal operational functionality. It does not include maintenance and troubleshooting procedures.

Avaya IP Office R9.1 Avaya one-x Portal Call Assistant Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT)

Hearing Issues for Students with Deafblindness: Collecting and Recording Hearing Information on the Learning Media Assessment December 3, pm-4pm

tation DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAMS BULLETIN COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE EFFECTIVE DATE: April 8, 2014 BY:

Online Courses for Parents and Professionals Who Want to Know More About Children who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

Dallas Regional Program for the Deaf

for Students Pennsylvania Agenda or Deafblind Who Are Deaf, Hard of Hearing,

NASDSE Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students Educational Service Guidelines IDEA Addendum July, 2000

Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT)

Looking to the Future of Deaf-Blind Services and the Role of Interveners: A National Webinar Co-Sponsored by NCDB and NFADB

Attitudes, Accommodations and Advocacy, Oh My!

Placement Checklist for Children Who Are Deaf/Hard of Hearing

Children Who Are Deaf-Blind With

The Medical and Educational Teams: Working Together in North Carolina to Improve Outcomes

Communication Planning Guide for Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

Fact Sheet. Receptive Communication By Rebecca M. Wilson

March 2007 SEC STATE PLANS. (b) ACADEMIC STANDARDS, ACADEMIC ASSESSMENTS, AND ACCOUNTABILITY. - (2) ACCOUNTABILITY. -

Robert 11 years old, has a hearing impairment*

Michael Macione, AuD; & Cheryl DeConde Johnson, EdD

Supports for. Dementia

Konftel 300Mx. Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT)

Summary Table Voluntary Product Accessibility Template

Mechanicsburg, Ohio. Policy: Ensuring Effective Communication for Individuals with Disabilities Policy Section: Inmate Supervision and Care

Note: This document describes normal operational functionality. It does not include maintenance and troubleshooting procedures.

The following information relates to NEC products offered under our GSA Schedule GS-35F- 0245J and other Federal Contracts.

Note: This document describes normal operational functionality. It does not include maintenance and troubleshooting procedures.

Emily A. Jones, PhD, BCBA 1

Webinars with ECFS. Be a Communicative Partner: It s the Gateway to Learning March 18, :00 p.m. EST

Note: This document describes normal operational functionality. It does not include maintenance and troubleshooting procedures.

Therapy Intake Form Today's Date: General Information: Full name of child: Male/Female: Parents/Guardians Name #1: Parents/Guardians Name #2: Address:

b. Entities that lease or rent space for their events but have no permanent public office or facility must also follow Title III of the ADA.

The University of Texas at El Paso

ELA Performance Task Guidance Document and FAQs

Evaluating & Teaching Yes/No Responses Based on an Analysis of Functions. Jennifer Albis, M.S., CCC-SLP

Avaya B179 Conference Telephone Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT)

Communication Portfolios

B. COURSE DESCRIPTION

Accessibility. Reporting Interpretation and Accommodation Requests

Potential Outcomes for Children Who Are Deaf-Blind with Cochlear Implants

Pennsylvania Agenda for Students Who Are Deaf, Hard of Hearing, or Deafblind

COMPLEX LEARNING DIFFICULTIES AND DISABILITIES RESEARCH PROJECT (CLDD)

Michael Macione, AuD, & Cheryl DeConde Johnson, EdD. a critical link within the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) process.

A Year of Tips for Communication Success

Engage for Change local a conversation in Spartanburg, SC. September 6, 2018

Avaya B189 Conference Telephone Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT)

Transcription:

Service Delivery Guide for Educating Students Who Are Deaf and Low Functioning

This document was developed by the Region 4 Deaf or Hard of Hearing (DHH) Itinerant Teacher Professional Learning Community (PLC) in Houston, Texas. These teachers deliver instructional services to students, support educational teams, and participate as members of Annual Review and Dismissal (ARD) committees. They work for Regional Day School Programs for the Deaf (RDSPD) across Regions 4, 5, and 6 in the state of Texas. As members of the DHH Itinerant Teacher PLC, they collaborate to develop resources that improve instruction and service delivery for students who are deaf and hard of hearing. Their experiences, time, and commitment to students are what made this project possible. A sincere thank you to the following teachers for their contributions: Rachel Cameron Kathryn Heartfield Tina Perry Rebecca Fielding Dianne Hunt Sunny Slaydon Jacqueline Galloway Kim Kasper Amanda Willett Brooke Harada Jennifer Perry Jene Wilson To access guide templates, please visit http://www.esc4.net/service/special-education-solutions/auditory-impairment This guide is not intended to be a substitute for applicable federal and state law, local policies and procedures, or specific legal advice.

Table of Contents Introduction... 3 How to Determine Service Delivery Level... 3 References... 4 Student Profile... 6 Student Skill Rubric... 7 Additional Considerations... 8 Results... 8 Service Delivery Grid... 8 Service Delivery Levels... 8 Example... 9

INTRODUCTION Purpose The purpose of this resource is to assist educational teams in discussing what level of support a student needs from a certified teacher of the deaf and hard of hearing. This resource is not intended to be the sole deciding factor on how to support a student who is considered deaf and low functioning. Additional considerations could include collaboration of services, assistive technology needs, and additional assessments. It is the responsibility of the ARD committee to make final decisions about services delivered to students. Students and Services In Texas, a student who is deaf and low functioning is one who meets eligibility as Auditory Impaired (AI) or Deaf Blind (DB) and is at risk for difficulties with communication skills, social emotional skills, mental and/or physical limitations, independent living skills, vocational skills, or academic skills. Across the state, a variety of service models exists to meet the unique learning and communication needs of this student population. One of these service models is the support of a deaf education itinerant teacher. An itinerant teacher travels among multiple schools offering services to eligible students and/or their teachers based on students needs as documented in their IEPs. There are two types of itinerant services. 1. Indirect Services A deaf education itinerant teacher functions as a consultant to the general and special education teacher(s) to provide guidance in using strategies for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. 2. Direct Services A deaf education itinerant teacher provides direct instruction to the student on a weekly basis as determined in the IEP. HOW TO DETERMINE SERVICE DELIVERY LEVEL 1. Complete the Student Profile on page 6. 2. Use the criteria outlined on the Student Skill Rubric on page 7 to choose the appropriate number from the scale that reflects your observations of the student in each of the 10 areas. 3. Add the Column Totals to determine the Rubric Total. 4. Review the Additional Considerations on page 8 and score accordingly. 5. Calculate the Raw Score by adding the Rubric and Additional Considerations Totals. 6. Compare the Raw Score to the Service Delivery Grid and Service Delivery Levels descriptions to determine the Service Delivery Level. If a student s score falls within two levels of support, it is up to the ARD committee to determine which level would be most appropriate for the student. 3

REFERENCES Deaf Education. (2011). Considerations to determine DHH service: Level of service and minutes/wk. Retrieved from www.deafed.net/publisheddocs/service%20determiners.doc Degman, L., & Lake County Hearing Itinerant Program. (n.d.). Hearing itinerant service rubric. Retrieved from http://successforkidswithhearingloss.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ Hearing-Itinerant-Services-Rubric.jpg Essential Assessments Rubric. (2011). Quality rubric: Multiple disabilities/deaf blind. Retrieved from http://earubric.com/mddb.html Robinson, N. B., & Soto, G. (2013). AAC in the schools: Best practices for intervention. Verona, WI: Attainment Company. Rowland, C. (Ed.). (2009). Assessing communication and learning in young children who are deafblind or who have multiple disabilities. Portland, OR: Design to Learn Projects, Oregon Health and Science University. Stredler-Brown, A., & Johnson, D. C. (2001, 2003). Functional auditory performance indicators: An integrated approach to auditory development. Retrieved from http://www.cde.state.co.us cdesped/specificdisability-hearing.htm Tri-County East Regional Day School Program for the Deaf. (2010). Communication rubric for multi-handicapped deaf children. Goose Creek, TX: Goose Creek Consolidated School District. Wilkes, E. M. (1999). Cottage acquisition scales for listening language and speech. San Antonio, TX: Sunshine Cottage School for Deaf Children. 4

STUDENT PROFILE Date: District: School: Student s Name: Chronological Age: Hearing Age: Grade: Special Education Eligibility(ies): Instructional Setting: Evaluator(s): Student s Preferred Mode of Communication: Home Language: Hearing Loss: Type of Personal Hearing Technology: Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) and/or Assistive Technology (AT): Additional Information if Applicable: Health: Behavior: Social Emotional: Other:

STUDENT SKILL RUBRIC Identify the level of performance for each skill area listed on the rubric by marking the box that describes the student. Choose a performance level that matches the student as closely as possible. If the student consistently performs between two levels of the same skill, you may choose to give a half-point value to that particular skill. Add the Column Totals to determine the Rubric Total. Performance Levels 1 2 3 4 5 6 Skills Areas Communication Expressive Communication Expressive Vocabulary Communication Receptive Communication Visual Tactile Memory no or minimal response; no outward expression or eye gaze does not use words, signs, objects, pictures, or other AAC does not respond to communication partner or environmental sounds does not respond to environment, people, or objects inconsistently completes common routines cries, laughs, reaches, grabs, and/or throws objects imitates words responds to speech and environmental sounds and/or communication partner anticipates/associates activity by actual or similar objects is able to complete common routines points or pulls a person; brings an item or activity; throws tantrums uses words spontaneously shares attention; uses eye gaze to track and participate anticipates/associates activity by a partial object retains new information from beginning to end of lesson uses meaningful gestures, vocalizations, signs, and/or other AAC independently labels or identifies objects complies with hand-overhand guidance; responds to greetings anticipates/associates activity by actual photos retains new information from morning to afternoon uses single-word utterances for limited communicative intentions communicates wants and needs with limited vocabulary complies after example or with prompts; responds to simple questions anticipates/associates activity by drawings retains new information from day to day uses phrases or sentences; displays a variety of communicative intentions spontaneously uses a variety of phrases and sentences complies by beginning an activity independently; responds to more difficult questions anticipates/associates activity with written text retains new information from week to week; transfers information in a variety of settings Auditory Skills does not respond to environmental sounds; uses vision to obtain information is aware of and can detect sound demonstrates understanding that sound is meaningful; localizes sound source discriminates environmental sounds and characteristics of speech auditory comprehension: follows 1-step directions auditory comprehension: follows multistep directions Attention with Preferred Work or Activity Attention with Nonpreferred Work or Activity Listening Technology Used at School no attention to stimuli no attention to stimuli does not wear, benefit from, or tolerate device preferred work/activity: less than 1 minute non-preferred work/ activity: less than 1 minute inconsistently uses device due to refusal Participation is disengaged does not respond when called upon Column Totals Rubric Total preferred work/activity: 1 3 minutes non-preferred work/ activity:1 3 minutes inconsistently uses device due to involuntary movement, or removal multiple times through the day is attentive but does not respond preferred work/activity: 4 5 minutes non-preferred work/ activity: 4-5 minutes wears device consistently but requires scheduled breaks is attentive but response is off topic preferred work/activity: 6 10 minutes non-preferred work/ activity: 6 10 minutes wears device consistently but with limited benefits is attentive and responds on topic with or without prompts preferred work/activity: more than 10 minutes nonpreferred work/ activity: more than 10 minutes wears device consistently and receives benefit is fully engaged and responds with or without prompts

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS Check any of the following considerations that apply to this student. Attendance (See your district s attendance policy.) Add 1 point (+1) if absent less than 18 days a school year. Subtract 1 ( 1) point if absent more than 18 days a school year. Amplification Add 1 point (+1) if used in home. Subtract 1 point ( 1) if not used at home. Include zero (0) points if inconsistent use. Health Concerns Add 1 point (+1) if health concerns do not affect daily routine. Subtract 1 point ( 1) if health concerns impact daily routine. Educational Needs Add 1 point (+1) if campus is not able to provide accommodations and modifications for this child on a regular basis without direct support of a deaf education teacher. Subtract 1 point ( 1) campus is able to provide accommodations and modifications for this child on a regular basis without direct support of a deaf education teacher. Additional Considerations Total RESULTS To determine the Raw Score, add the Rubric Total and the Additional Considerations Total. Next, plot the Raw Score on the Service Delivery Grid below by finding the range where the Raw Score lies. Mark the possible option(s) for service delivery by marking the white box(es) within that range. Raw Score Total (Rubric Total + Additional Considerations Total = Raw Score Total) SERVICE DELIVERY GRID Service Delivery Level 1 2 3 Raw Score Range 0 9 10 19 20 29 30 39 40 49 50 60 SERVICE DELIVERY LEVELS* Level 1 Indirect: A certified teacher attends annual IEP meetings and provides support to IEP team as needed. The AI teacher may also provide support with amplification equipment. Level 2 Indirect: A certified teacher meets periodically with classroom teacher and staff working with student. Level 3 Direct: A certified teacher provides direct instruction to the student for a minimum of 45 minutes per week. *This guide is not intended to be a substitute for applicable federal and state law, local policies and procedures, or specific legal advice.

9 EXAMPLE

EXAMPLE 10

1230859 Service Delivery Guide for Educating Students Who Are Deaf and Low Functioning