Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines

Similar documents
Gene Vaccine Dr. Sina Soleimani

C. Incorrect! MHC class I molecules are not involved in the process of bridging in ADCC.

staining and flow cytometry

Vaccination. Artificially induced specific adaptive immunity

Biotechnology-Based Vaccines. Dr. Aws Alshamsan Department of Pharmaceutics Office: AA87 Tel:

TITLE: Development of Antigen Presenting Cells for adoptive immunotherapy in prostate cancer

Cytotoxicity assays. Rory D. de Vries, PhD 1. Viroscience lab, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Medical Virology Immunology. Dr. Sameer Naji, MB, BCh, PhD (UK) Head of Basic Medical Sciences Dept. Faculty of Medicine The Hashemite University

Immuno-Oncology Therapies and Precision Medicine: Personal Tumor-Specific Neoantigen Prediction by Machine Learning

TITLE: Development of Antigen Presenting Cells for adoptive immunotherapy in prostate cancer

TITLE: Development of Antigen Presenting Cells for adoptive immunotherapy in prostate cancer

CANCER IMMUNOPATHOLOGY. Eryati Darwin Faculty of Medicine Andalas University

Immuno-Oncology Therapies and Precision Medicine: Personal Tumor-Specific Neoantigen Prediction by Machine Learning

WHO International Biological Reference Preparations Held and distributed by the WHO International Laboratories for Biological Standards

Trends in vaccinology

Tumors arise from accumulated genetic mutations. Tumor Immunology (Cancer)

Defensive mechanisms include :

Vaccine Design: A Statisticans Overview

Properties & Overview of IRs Dr. Nasser M. Kaplan JUST, Jordan. 10-Jul-16 NM Kaplan 1

Scott Abrams, Ph.D. Professor of Oncology, x4375 Kuby Immunology SEVENTH EDITION

Chapter 1. Full file at

Antigen specific anti-spas-1 CD8 T cell responses to in situ vaccination using irreversible electroporation (IRE) of prostate tumors

There are 2 major lines of defense: Non-specific (Innate Immunity) and. Specific. (Adaptive Immunity) Photo of macrophage cell

Antigens and Immunogens

CHAPTER-VII IMMUNOLOGY R.KAVITHA, M.PHARM, LECTURER, DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS, SRM COLLEGE OF PHARMACY, SRM UNIVERSITY, KATTANKULATHUR.

Immunity & How Vaccines Work

VACCINATION. DR.FATIMA ALKHALEDY M.B.Ch.B;F.I.C.M.S/C.M.

Tumor Immunology. Wirsma Arif Harahap Surgical Oncology Consultant

1. Overview of Adaptive Immunity

08/02/59. Tumor Immunotherapy. Development of Tumor Vaccines. Types of Tumor Vaccines. Immunotherapy w/ Cytokine Gene-Transfected Tumor Cells

By:Reham Alahmadi NOV The production of antibodies and vaccination technology

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Antibacterials and Antivirals

Immunology Lecture 4. Clinical Relevance of the Immune System

Cationic Liposome-DNA Complexes as Immunomodulators and Vaccine Adjuvants

PREPARATION STANDARD MATERIAL HELD AT CODE WHO/BS DOCUMENT. 1st Reference Reagent, 2009

Stainless-steel vs Single-use: The Vaccines Perspective

DEBATE ON HIV ENVELOPE AS A T CELL IMMUNOGEN HAS BEEN GAG-GED

Patricia Fitzgerald-Bocarsly

SPECIFIC DEFENSE: THE IMMUNE SYSTEM

Acquired Immunity 2. - Vaccines & Immunological Memory - Wataru Ise. WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center (IFReC) Osaka University.

Potency Assays Throughout Product Development: Perspectives of an FDA Reviewer

Mucosal Immune System

The Immune System is the Third Line of Defense Against Infection. Components of Human Immune System

2 - Adaptive Immunity

Annex 3 Recommendations for the production and control of group C meningococcal conjugate vaccines (Addendum 2003)

Practical Applications of Immunology. Chapter 18

Enhancing the Clinical Activity of HER2/neu Specific T Cells. William Gwin, MD Internal Medicine, Resident University of Washington

Immunization (I) Dr. Aws Alshamsan Department of Pharmaceu5cs Office: AA87 Tel:

How does the body defend itself?

Immune surveillance hypothesis (Macfarlane Burnet, 1950s)

Prof. Ibtesam Kamel Afifi Professor of Medical Microbiology & Immunology

BBS 2711 Virology. Virus Vaccines

Page 4: Antigens: Self-Antigens The body has a vast number of its own antigens called self-antigens. These normally do not trigger immune responses.

Developing Understanding of CMI. Dr Tom Wilkinson Associate Professor of Respiratory Medicine Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton UK

Immunotherapy: The Newest Treatment Route

IN VIVO STUDIES ON VIRAL VIRULENCE

Disruption of Healthy Tissue by the Immune Response Autoimmune diseases: Inappropriate immune response against self-components

The Adaptive Immune Responses

Glioblastoma and CNS tumors

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Annex 5. Generic protocol for the calibration of seasonal and pandemic influenza antigen working reagents by WHO essential regulatory laboratories

WP6 (Lead Partner RUG) Clinical Trial Program

The Immune System. These are classified as the Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses. Innate Immunity

Please read Chapters 5, 6 and 7 of your vaccine text for next Wednesday s lecture. Chapters 9, 17 and 8 for next Friday s lectures

Unit 5 The Human Immune Response to Infection

Lecture 11. Immunology and disease: parasite antigenic diversity

LYMPHOCYTES & IMMUNOGLOBULINS. Dr Mere Kende, Lecturer SMHS

Adaptive Immunity. Jeffrey K. Actor, Ph.D. MSB 2.214,

Immune System AP SBI4UP

Table Of Contents Executive Summary Introduction to Vaccines Pediatric Preventive Vaccines

محاضرة مناعت مدرس المادة :ا.م. هدى عبدالهادي علي النصراوي Immunity to Infectious Diseases

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD 21205

Madhav V. Dhodapkar, Joseph Krasovsky, Ralph M. Steinman, and Nina Bhardwaj

9/10/2018. Principles of Vaccination. Immunity. Antigen. September 2018

Chapter 17B: Adaptive Immunity Part II

Cell-mediated Immunity

Production of Interferon Alpha by Dengue Virus-infected Human Monocytes

Page # Lecture 8: Immune Dysfunction - Immunopathology. Four Types of Hypersensitivity. Friend of Foe? Autoimmune disease Immunodeficiency

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimate that vaccination averts 2-3 million deaths per year (in all age groups), and up to 1.

STATE OF THE ART 4: Combination Immune Therapy-Chemotherapy. Elizabeth M. Jaffee (JHU) James Yang (NCI) Jared Gollob (Duke) John Kirkwood (UPMI)

Essentials in Bioassay Design and Relative Potency Determination

CHAPTER ONE: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The Global Vaccine Industry CHAPTER TWO: INTRODUCTION TO VACCINES

Viral vaccines. Lec. 3 أ.د.فائزة عبد هللا مخلص

VIRUSES. Biology Applications Control. David R. Harper. Garland Science Taylor & Francis Group NEW YORK AND LONDON

Developmental Toxicity Study Designs for Preventive Vaccines: Issues and Challenges

Immunity. Avian Physiology

CHAPTER 18: Immune System

Herd Protective Effects of Vaccines. John Clemens icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh

June IMMUNE DESIGN The in vivo generation of cytotoxic CD8 T cells (CTLs)

CONVENTIONAL VACCINE DEVELOPMENT

MCB 4211 Basic Immunology 2nd Exam; 10/26/17 Peoplesoft #:

Chapter 23 Immunity Exam Study Questions

MONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE Department of Science LECTURE OUTLINE CHAPTERS 16, 17, 18 AND 19

vaccines. Lecture 16 Dr. Gary Mumaugh

Abstract #163 Michael Kalos, PhD

IOM Immunization Safety Review 11/12/2001. Immunological Competition and the Infant Immune Response to Vaccines

Immune system. Self/non-self recognition. Memory. The state of protection from infectious disease. Acceptance vs rejection

PATHOGENICITY OF MICROORGANISMS

Helminth worm, Schistosomiasis Trypanosomes, sleeping sickness Pneumocystis carinii. Ringworm fungus HIV Influenza

Transcription:

Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines Goal for all therapeutic cancer vaccines: To enhance the natural immune response so that it becomes an effective therapy Approaches being investigated in clinical studies: Whole tumor cells Tumor cell lysates Proteins Peptides DNA 1

Potency Assays for Cell-based Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines Challenges Develop a potency assay before the results of Phase 3 are known Antigenic correlates of efficacy are tentative before Phase 3 results are known, and the correlates may not be known even after Phase 3 A framework for measuring potency during clinical development can be based on experience with other biological products, especially infectious disease vaccines 2

Definitions of Potency ICH the measure of biological activity,, using a suitably quantitative biological assay, based on the attribute of the product that is linked to the relevant biological properties. WHO Adopted ICH in November 2003 WHO Comment: Potency tests measure biological activity of a vaccine, but do not necessarily reflect the mechanism of protection in human. 3

Potency Assays Purposes of a potency assay Ensure that a given batch has at least a pre-defined minimum level of potential biological activity that will give an expected result (e.g. an antibody response) Demonstrate batch-to to-batch consistency by a method that in some way depends on and reflects biological activity. Measurement of potential biological activity is usually direct, but it may be indirect Ideally,, the measured biological activity correlates with efficacy 4

Potency Assays for Infectious Disease Vaccines Ideally, a potency assay applies to all products in a given class: Diphtheria toxoids Live poliovirus vaccines 1 or more Ags are required for biological activity by inducing a clinically beneficial immune response (Ab( Ab,, CMI, or both) If IR correlates with efficacy, then In vitro tests can be use to measure antigen content In vivo tests have been used to measure Ab production Protection against challenge 5

Potency Assays for Live Vaccines Against Infectious Diseases Potency usually is based on titration of the infective dose in cell cultures and usually includes a reference preparation linked to a WHO International Standard The amount of infectious units required is based on the results of clinical trials where dose and IR is correlated with efficacy Minimum level of infectious units is established Upper limit may be indicated in some cases Acceptability range is broad: +/- 0.5 log 10 6

Potency Assays for Killed Vaccines Against Infectious Diseases Potency usually is based on the quantitative measure of the content of 1 or more selected Ags D antigen for inactivated poliovirus vaccines HA for inactivated influenza vaccines Acceptability range is broad: +/- 0.5 log 10 Direct link between IR and efficacy is not always possible Whole cell pertusis Anthrax 7

Potency Assays for Non-Vaccine Therapeutic Biological Products Carticel autologous cultured chondrocytes approved for the repair of damaged cartilage Cell viability >80% Potency: number of live cells Interferon-alpha approved to treat Stage III melanoma and other cancers Potency: antiviral activity (not directly related to therapeutic activity) Demonstrates biological activity Can be used to assess manufacturing consistency 8

Criteria for an Acceptable Potency Assay for Cell-based Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines Assumption: The induction of a protective IR is the most probable mechanism to account for efficacy. Results of any potency assay must answer 2 questions Is the amount of one or more selected Ags sufficient to induce a clinically meaningful IR? Based on clinical studies, this confirms that enough Ag is present to result in a therapeutic IR Is the amount of one or more selected Ags in the vaccine consistent from batch-to to-batch? Target level +/- 0.5 log 10 Also select other Ags,, if necessary, for which the amount of Ag expression is sensitive to manufacturing conditions even if those Ags are unrelated to efficacy 9

Potency Assay Considerations for Cell- based Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines Quantitative measurement of 1 or more cellular Ags (surface or internal) Must be related to biological activity or effect Ab formation in humans provides a link to biological effect Is a bioassay also necessary? During clinical development, direct correlates of clinical protection have not yet been established 10

Possible Outcomes of Efficacy in Phase 3 Studies of Cell-based Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines 1. IR to 1 or more selected Ags correlates with efficacy Ideal situation Potency can be based on one or more of the Ags 2. IR to 1 or more selected Ags is demonstrated, but there is no correlation with efficacy IR is complex and may involve both the cellular & humoral arms to an unknown combination of Ags 3. IR to selected Ags is poor, but clinical efficacy is established Quantitative Ag expression is probably unacceptable A bioassay provides an alternative measure of potency, and should be developed in parallel as a backup 11

An Acceptable Potency Assay for Cell- based Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines Number of viable cells that express selected Ags that correlate with efficacy Quantitative measure of expression of the selected Ags Consistent with: ICH & WHO definitions of potency Approach used for infectious disease vaccines and an analogous product (Carticel) 12

An Acceptable Potency Assay for Cell- based Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines When There Is No Correlation With Efficacy Viable cell count Bioassay 13

Possible Bioassays for Cell-based Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines Animal challenge ( (in vivo protection) No current model exists Validation issues May not reflect the human IR Animal Ab production to selected Ags May not reflect the human IR Reaction to different epitopes on an Ag Transgenic animals may be useful 14

Possible Bioassays for Cell-based Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines Vaccine cell lysis by human CTLs cell lines to selected Ags Availability of the CTL lines Standardization of assay Validation of the assay Clones are reactive to only a single epitope Production of a cytokine marker in a mixed- lymphocyte culture T-cell response to multiple Ags Cells obtained from humans or animals who received the vaccine Cytokine release measured after co-culture culture 15

Final Selection of a Potency Assay for Cell- based Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines When a Correlation With Efficacy Is Established Routine lot release Viable cell count Quantitative Ag expression Comparability (manufacturing changes) Viable cell count Quantitative Ag expression Bioassay 16