DDW abstract review: Crohn s disease/ibd. Jesse Siffledeen Edmonton. May 26-28, 2017 Fairmont Chateau Lake Louise, Lake Louise, Alberta

Similar documents
5/2/2018 SHOULD DEEP REMISSION BE A TREATMENT GOAL? YES! Disclosures: R. Balfour Sartor, MD

Disclosures. What Do I Do When Anti-TNF Therapy Is Not Working Anymore? Fadi Hamid, M.D. Saint Luke s GI Specialists

Mucosal healing: does it really matter?

September 12, 2015 Millie D. Long MD, MPH, FACG

2nd Nottingham IBD Masterclass, 2017

Highlights of DDW 2015: Crohn s disease

Predicting response to anti - integrin therapy: long term efficacy and roles for optimisation with vedolizumab.

Gionata Fiorino VEDOLIZUMAB E IBD. Un nuovo target terapeutico

Personalized Medicine. Selecting the Right First-line Biologic Agent. Gene Expression Profiles Crohn s Disease. The Right Treatment

Update on Biologics in Ulcerative Colitis. Scott Plevy, MD University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC

The Best of IBD at UEGW (Crohn s)

CAG Symposium: Management of IBD in 2018

Optimizing the effectiveness of anti-tnf therapy in paediatric IBD

Recent Advances in the Management of Refractory IBD

An Update on the Biologic Treatment for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. David A. Schwartz, MD

Selection and use of the non-anti- TNF biological therapies: Who? When? How?

Severe IBD: What to Do When Anti- TNFs Don t Work?

IBD Updates. Themes in IBD IBD management journey. New tools for therapeutic monitoring. First-line treatment in IBD

Treating to Achieve a Target and Disease Monitoring in 2015: State of the Art

Association Between Plasma Concentrations of Certolizumab Pegol and Endoscopic Outcomes of Patients With Crohn's Disease

Position of Biologics in IBD Circa 2006: Top Down vs. Step Up Therapy

4/16/2018. Updates in Crohn s Disease. Disclosures. Learning Objectives. Crohn s Disease is Progressive and Destructive

Biologics in IBD. Brian P. Bosworth, MD, NYSGEF Associate Professor of Medicine Weill Cornell Medical College

Outline. Biologic Drugs in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Dr. Jason Etzel MD The Vancouver Clinic. Biologic Drugs. Biologic Drugs. Biologic Drugs Anti-TNF

Withdrawal of drug therapy in patients with quiescent Crohn s disease

Endpoints for Stopping Treatment in UC

Selective leucocyte trafficking inhibitors for treatment of IBD

Mucosal Healing in Crohn s Disease. Geert D Haens MD, PhD University Hospital Gasthuisberg University of Leuven Leuven, Belgium

Synopsis. Adalimumab M Clinical Study Report R&D/16/1088. Individual Study Table Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume:

Emerging g therapies for IBD: A practical approach to positioning. Sequential Therapies for IBD

Biologic Therapy for Inflammatory. Is Top-Down Too Top-Heavy? S. Devi Rampertab, MD, FACG, AGAF Associate Professor of Medicine University of Florida

The future of IBD therapeutic research

Medical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Optimizing Therapies for Severe Ulcerative Colitis October 19, 2014

Indications for use of Infliximab

Common Questions in Crohn s Disease Therapy. Case

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Overview of the Paediatric investigation plans. Presented by: Richard Veselý. An agency of the European Union

KEEP CALM AND TREAT TO TARGET IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

Choosing and Positioning Biologic Therapy for Crohn s Disease: (Still) Looking for the Crystal Ball

Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume: Page:

New treatment options in IBD: today and the future. Silvio Danese Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy

What is New in Esophageal Motility Disorders

Personalized Medicine in IBD: Where Are We in 2013

How to use infliximab?

Από τη θεωρία στη πράξη: Συζήτηση κλινικών περιστατικών. Κωνσταντίνος Κατσάνος Επίκουρος Καθηγητής Γαστρεντερολογίας Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων

Efficacy and Safety of Treatment for Pediatric IBD

RE: Title: Practical fecal calprotectin cut-off value for Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis

STELARA (ustekinumab) Clinical Study Report CNTO1275CRD3001

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab M Clinical Study Report Final R&D/15/1054. (For National Authority Use Only)

Mono or Combination Therapy with. Individualized Approach

Anne Griffiths MD, FRCPC. SickKids Hospital, University of Toronto. Buenos Aires, August 16, 2014

New and Future Adhesion Molecule Based Therapies in IBD

Perianal and Fistulizing Crohn s Disease: Tough Management Decisions. Jean-Paul Achkar, M.D. Kenneth Rainin Chair for IBD Research Cleveland Clinic

5-ASA for the treatment of Crohn s disease DR. STEPHEN HANAUER FEINBERG SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY, CHICAGO, IL, USA

Agenda. Predictive markers in IBD. Management of ulcerative colitis. Management of Crohn s disease

Medical Therapy for Pediatric IBD: Efficacy and Safety

Definitions. Clinical remission: Resolution of symptoms (stool frequency 3/day, no bleeding and no urgency)

Drug Level Monitoring in IBD. Objectives

The Refractory Crohn s Disease

Op#mal Therapy in IBD: Where Are We Now?

Crohn's Disease. The What, When, and Why of Treatment

2. SYNOPSIS. Clinical Study Report CD-LAQ-201. November 2012

Positioning New Therapies

Biologic Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis in 2015

Looking for Answers. IBD Research March 9, Dr. Benjamin Click, MD MS Associate Staff Cleveland Clinic

Dr David Epstein Vincent Pallotti Hospital and University of Cape Town

IBD in teenagers Biological and Transition

Dr. Elmer Schabel, MD. Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Bonn, Germany (No conflicts of interest)

Biologics, Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Folate intake in pregnancy and psychomotor development at 18 months

Latest Treatment Updates for Ulcerative Colitis: Evolving Treatment Goals

Il ruolo degli anticorpi anti farmaco nella pratica clinica

Personalized Medicine in IBD

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 3 October 2012

SYNOPSIS. Issue Date: 25 Oct 2011

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody for maintenace of remission in Crohn s disease (Review)

Crohn s Disease: Should We Treat Based on Symptoms or Based on Objective Markers of Inflammation?

Treatment of Pediatric IBD: What is Different?

Beyond Anti TNFs: positioning of other biologics for Crohn s disease. Christina Ha, MD Cedars Sinai Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center

INFLIXIMAB FOR PREVENTION OF POST-OPERATIVE CROHN S DISEASE RECURRENCE: THE PREVENT TRIAL

Join the conversation at #GIFORUMCCFA

John F. Valentine, MD Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program University of Utah

Azathioprine for Induction and Maintenance of Remission in Crohn s Disease

How to manage your IBD patient: Tips for diagnosis and care

Long-term Efficacy of Vedolizumab for Crohn s Disease

Pregnancy in IBD CDDW 2014

CROHN'S DISEASE/ULCERATIVE COLITIS TREATMENT ALGORITHM

Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disorder

WHY HAVE WE NOT FINALLY FIGURED OUT COMBINATION THERAPY?

Pharmacotherapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disorder

Vedolizumab: policing leukocyte traffic

Annual Rheumatology & Therapeutics Review for Organizations & Societies

Positioning Biologics in Ulcerative Colitis

Implementation of disease and safety predictors during disease management in UC

Can We Predict the Natural History of Ulcerative Colitis? Edward V Loftus, Jr, MD Professor of Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Therapies for IBD: the Pipeline. New Therapeutic Agents in IBD

How to Optimize Induction and Maintenance Responses: Definitions and Dosing Advances in Inflammatory Bowel Disease December 6, 2009

New treatment options in UC. Rob Bryant IBD Consultant Royal Adelaide Hospital

Op#mizing)Management)in)IBD:) Mucosal)Healing)

Transcription:

DDW abstract review: Crohn s disease/ibd Jesse Siffledeen Edmonton May 26-28, 2017 Fairmont Chateau Lake Louise, Lake Louise, Alberta

Disclosure of Commercial Support Potential for conflict(s) of interest: Dr. Siffledeen has not received any payment/funding from a sponsored organization for this presentation.

Mitigating Potential Bias Sponsor representatives are not in the planning committee of the program. The planning committee carefully chooses the topics for the program in order to ensure that the principles of scientific integrity, objectivity and balance have been respected. Planning committee chair and members have individual discussions with each speaker regarding expected learning outcomes and teaching format. CME&PD Office provides information sheets and forms to each speaker, communicating the course learning objectives and requirement of scientific integrity, as well as instruction on conflict of interest disclosure and managing bias.

Superior endoscopic and deep remission outcomes in adults with moderate-severe Crohn s disease managed with treat-totarget approach versus clinical symptoms: data from CALM Jesse Siffledeen Edmonton May 26-28, 2017 Fairmont Chateau Lake Louise, Lake Louise, Alberta

CALM: endoscopic and deep remission with T2T Colombel et al. DDW Aim: to demonstrate that tight control of disease activity using stringent criteria (CDAI, CRP, FCP, & CS use) improves mucosal healing at 56 weeks, as compared to management using less stringent criteria (CDAI & CS use). Methods: subjects had moderate-severe active CD at baseline (based on CDAI, CS use and CDEIS score) and elevated biomarkers (CRP 5, FCP 250). Received step-up in treatment, based on success criteria Primary endpoint: CDEIS < 4 (& no deep ulcers). Secondary endpoints: deep remission (add CDAI<150, no CS after 8 wk, no draining fistulae), biologic remission (FCP<250, CRP<5, CDEIS<4)

CALM: endoscopic and deep remission with T2T Conclusions 1. Tight control (treating to target) leads to superior endoscopic and deep remission 2. This is the first direct evidence of the same Comments 1. With FCP becoming more widely available, these results suggest that it should be routinely measured in CD patients, and acted upon if levels are >250 (dose escalation, or endoscopy/imaging). May 26-28, 2017 Fairmont Chateau Lake Louise, Lake Louise, Alberta

Rapidity of onset of response to adalimumab (ADA) in luminal Crohn s disease. Data from the RAPIDA trial Jesse Siffledeen Edmonton May 26-28, 2017 Fairmont Chateau Lake Louise, Lake Louise, Alberta

RAPIDA rapidity of onset of response to ADA Marin-Jiminez et al (Mo1773) DDW AIM: multicenter, single arm, open-label study to evaluate the rapidity of onset of clinical response to ADA. Methods: adults with moderate-severe active dz (HBI>8), excluding stricturing and penetrating dz, not responding to conventional Tx (CS +/- IS), received standard adalimumab induction (160/80/40 eow) Endpoints: - HBI response ( 3 pts) evaluated at day 4, week 1. - Clinical remission (HBI <5) assessed at weeks 2, 4, 12 - CRP and FCP assessed at day 4, weeks 1, 2, 4, 12

RAPIDA rapidity of onset of response to ADA Results - 80 patients - Response: 62.5% @ day 4, 71.3% @ wk 1 - Remission: 50% @ wk 2, 62.5% @ wk 4-42.5% @ wk 12 - Median time to response: 4 days (95% CI 0-7) - Median time to response: 7.0 days (4-18) Median CRP levels (mg/l) Median FC levels (µg/g) p-value vs baseline for CRP and FC Baseline 5.50 732 Day 4 1.71 453 P<0.0001 Week 1 1.71 465 P<0.0001 Week 2 1.66 448 P<0.0001 Week 4 2.47 279 P<0.0001

RAPIDA rapidity of onset of response to ADA Conclusions: 1. ADA promotes rapid clinical response and remission, which can be seen as early as day 4, in CD patients unresponsive to therapy with CS +/- IS. Comments: 1. Response compares with real world data 2. Indirectly supports multimodal induction therapy (drop in remission rates at week 12 may be d/t CS taper). May 26-28, 2017 Fairmont Chateau Lake Louise, Lake Louise, Alberta

ARE ANTI-TUMOR NECROSIS FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH WEIGHT GAIN IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE? Jesse Siffledeen Edmonton May 26-28, 2017 Fairmont Chateau Lake Louise, Lake Louise, Alberta

? Anti-TNF therapy and weight gain Winter R, et al (Sa1966) DDW AIM: a retrospective cohort study that compared weight gain using anti-tnf therapy vs. anti-integrin therapy (vedolizumab) in patients with IBD (both CD and UC) Methods: patients initiating anti-tnf or VDZ between 2010-2015 had weight collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after therapy initiation. Endpoints: 1. Univariate analysis comparing % weight change at time points 2. Linear regression analysis, controlling for disease type (CD or UC), age, gender, smoking status, BL weight, CS use in 1 st 3 months, CRP

Results? Anti-TNF therapy and weight gain 301 patients (215 anti-tnf, 86 VDZ)

? Anti-TNF therapy and weight gain Results Univariate analysis: - 6.99% vs. 2.29% at month 12 (p=0.0091) Multivariate analysis: - anti-tnf associated with significantly more weight gain at 12 months - Β-coeff 3.62 (p=0.02) - Trend to weight gain at 6 months, but not statistically significant - Β-coeff 1.81 (p=0.1)

? Anti-TNF therapy and weight gain Conclusions: 1. Suggests anti-tnf therapy is associated with weight gain over 12 months 2. Overall 7 per cent weight gain over one year Comments: 1. Largest limitation is standardization for objective response to therapy 2. Despite this, a 7 per cent weight gain warrants discussion with patients, who may come to the office already concerned about this possibility. May 26-28, 2017 Fairmont Chateau Lake Louise, Lake Louise, Alberta

Exposure to biologic therapy and childhood development among offspring of women with inflammatory bowel disease: results from the PIANO registry Jesse Siffledeen Edmonton May 26-28, 2017 Fairmont Chateau Lake Louise, Lake Louise, Alberta

Exposure to biologics and childhood development Roy A, et al (Sa1966) DDW AIM: mulitcenter prospective cohort study assessing offspring development/achievement of milestones in pregnant IBD patients Methods: collected mothers medication exposure, IBD activity, complications in pregnancy, and maternal + infant outcomes for 4 years after delivery. Patients were stratified by drug exposure; group A (IS), group B (biologic), group AB (IS + biologic), controls (IBD mothers w/o exposure to IS or biologic in pregnancy) - Developmental milestones measured by mothers at months 4, 9, 12 (Denver II developmental screening test) and at years 1, 2, 3, 4 (Ages and stages questionnaire).

Exposur e Group Outcome # Obs (Exposed) # Obs (Unexposed) Mean Score Ref Mean Score Exposed Delta Score p-value B 12 month DDST 362 260 0.859 0.879 0.019 0.0252 AB 12 month commun. ASQ 58 108 50.972 55.138 4.166 0.0042 AB 24 month fine motor ASQ 43 102 54.745 51.651-3.094 0.0446 AB 48 month commun. ASQ 20 93 58.28 60 1.72 0.0044

Exposure to biologics and childhood development Results: 1284 women with live births 232 group A, 525 group B, 171 group AB, 356 control group Compared with controls: treatment groups had equal or better achievement of developmental milestones throughout. Incidence of any low-scoring domain on ASQ was low in the study population, and not associated with drug exposure Multivariate analysis: no association b/w developmental delay and drug exposure at year 1 IS OR 0.36 (95% CI 0.09-1.43) Biologic OR 0.40 (0.15-1.07) Combination therapy OR 0.65 (0.19-2.16) Neuropsychiatric disease rare (seizures 0.9%, autism 0.1%, ADHD 0.2%) Compared with population means: infants exposed to biologics had consistently better achievement of developmental milestones

Exposure to biologics and childhood development Conclusions: 1. Large prospective study demonstrating no adverse developmental outcomes in infants exposed to IS +/- biologic therapy in-utero. 2. Infants exposed to biologics had consistently better developmental outcomes as compared with population averages. Comments: 1. Implications for discussion with patients when starting biologics 2. Limitations: does not account for impact of affluence and other SEC factors of population