Is OPLL-induced canal stenosis a risk factor of cord injury in cervical trauma?

Similar documents
S.S.K.MUNASINGHE ARACHCHIGE NATIONAL HOSPITAL OF SRI LANKA

Clinical Results and Complications of Surgical Treatment for Thoracic Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

Radiological pathogenesis of cervical myelopathy in 60 consecutive patients with cervical ossi cation of the posterior longitudinal ligament

Disclosures: T. Yoshii: None. T. Yamada: None. T. Taniyama: None. S. Sotome: None. T. Kato: None. S. Kawabata: None. A. Okawa: None.

Stage Operation for Unstable Lumbar Spine Fracture- Dislocation with Incomplete Paraplegia: A Case Series

INTRODUCTION.

Yoshifumi Kudo, 1 Tomoaki Toyone, 1 Toshiyuki Shirahata, 1 Tomoyuki Ozawa, 1 Akira Matsuoka, 1 Yoichi Jin, 2 and Katsunori Inagaki 1. 1.

Comparative study on the effect of anterior and posterior decompression in the treatment of multi-segmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Sir William Asher ANATOMY

Morphological changes of the cervical spinal canal and cord due to aging on MR imaging

Comprehension of the common spine disorder.

Contributing factors affecting the prognosis surgical outcome for thoracic OLF

Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine

Cervical Spine Surgery: Approach related outcome

) ACDF. (Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA) ACCF (175.4±12.1ml VS 201.3±80.4ml) ACDF JOA VAS (P=0.000),ACCF :A : X(2015)

Spinal Cord (2005) 43, & 2005 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved /05 $

Cervical corpectomy for sub-axial retro-vertebral body lesions

Rick C. Sasso MD Professor Chief of Spine Surgery Clinical Orthopaedic Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine

Complex Spine Symposium January 12th, Balgrist University Hospital

Computed tomography analysis of L5-S1 fusion in Adult spinal deformity

CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS AND CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY

Cervical artificial disc replacement versus fusion in the cervical spine: a systematic review comparing multilevel versus single-level surgery

Department of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Spinal injury. Structure of the spine

Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation Medicine Fuculty of Medical Sciences University of Fukui

Ligamentous Integrity in Spinal Cord Injury without Radiographic Abnormality. Dr Anria Horn Dr Stewart Dix-Peek

The Predictable Factors of the Postoperative Kyphotic Change of Sagittal Alignment of the Cervical Spine after the Laminoplasty

ORIGINAL PAPER. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chubu Rosai Hospital, Nagoya, Japan ABSTRACT

CMEARTICLE * * * Wen Qi Tan 1, BEng, Bak Siew Steven Wong 2, MBChB, MMed

Short Segment Screw Fixation without Fusion for Low Lumbar Burst Fracture: Severe Canal Compromise but Neurologically Intact Cases

102 Results RESULTS. Age Mean=S.D Range 42= years -84 years Number % <30 years years >50 years

Incidence and Risk Factors for Late Neurologic Deterioration after C3-6 Laminoplasty in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Original Investigation. Byung-Wan CHOI. INTRODUCTION Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament ABSTRACT

Neurological manifestations of thoracic myelopathy in 203 patients

Cervical myelopathy is a common disease that is

Risk factors for development of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of a systematic review

Objectives. Comprehension of the common spine disorder

Selective laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparative study with a minimum 5-year follow-up

REFERENCE DOCTOR Thoracolumbar Trauma MIS Options. Hyeun Sung Kim, MD, PhD,

Lumbar Laminotomy DEFINING APPROPRIATE COVERAGE POSITIONS NASS COVERAGE POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS TASKFORCE

Morphological Patterns of the Anterior Median Fissure in the Cervical Spinal Cord Evaluated by Computed Tomography After Myelography

Kinematic Cervical Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Low-Impact Trauma Assessment

Treatment of chronic traumatic C7 T1 grade III spondylolisthesis with mild neurological deficit: case report

Outcome of Surgical Treatment of AO Type C Pelvic Ring Injury

Analysis of radiological factors promoting degeneration in adjacent disc levels after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(acdf)

Christopher I. Shaffrey, MD

Effect of Swallowing Function After ROI-C Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion

Delayed surgical treatment for a traumatic bilateral cervical facet joint dislocation using a posterior-anterior approach: a case report

DEGENERATIVE SPINAL DISEASE PRABIN SHRESTHA ANISH M SINGH B&B HOSPITAL

Abstract Study Design Systematic review. Weerasak Singhatanadgige 1 Worawat Limthongkul 1 Frank Valone III 2 Wicharn Yingsakmongkol 1 K.

Cervical Curvature Became More Lordotic in Flexion Post-Operatively Regardless of Type of Surgical Approach in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Junming Cao, Yongsheng Lin, Xiangbei Qi, Zhihong Wang, Yipeng Yang, Hehuan Xia, Bin Xu

Fixation of multiple level anterior cervical disc using cages versus cages and plating

Bone Cement-Augmented Percutaneous Short Segment Fixation : An Effective Treatment for Kummell s Disease?

Pediatric cervical spine injuries with neurological deficits, treatment options, and potential for recovery

Lumbar Disc Herniation Presented with Contralateral Symptoms

Long term prognosis of young adults after ACDF

Am I eligible for the TOPS study? Possibly, if you suffer from one or more of the following conditions:

Daniel J. Blizzard, MD, MS

Ten Second Step Test" as a New Quantifiable Parameter of Cervical Myelopathy. Spine January 1, 2009; Volume 34; Issue 1; pp 82-86

Key Primary CPT Codes: Refer to pages: 7-9 Last Review Date: October 2016 Medical Coverage Guideline Number:

Original Article Prognosis of Cervical Degenerative Myelopathy after Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomies and Fusion

SpineFAQs. Neck Pain Diagnosis and Treatment

Spinal canal stenosis Degenerative diseases F 06

factor for identifying unstable thoracolumbar fractures. There are clinical and radiological criteria

Pathogenesis of Cervical Myelopathy in Chronic Cervical Cord Compression Model of Rat

ACDF. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. An introduction to

Risk Prediction for Development of Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without Spinal Instability

Spontaneous Resolution of Spinal Canal Deformity After Burst Dispersion Fracture

Unanswered Questions. Laminoplasty is best

ASJ. Analysis of the Prevalence and Distribution of Cervical and Thoracic Compressive Lesions of the Spinal Cord in Lumbar Degenerative Disease

Congenital Anomaly of the Atlas Misdiagnosed as Posterior Arch Fracture of the Atlas and Atlantoaxial Subluxation

Gillian Wooldridge, DO Houston Methodist Willowbrook Hospital Primary Care Sports Medicine Fellowship May 3, 2018

Mitsuhiro Hashimto 1), Masashi Yamazaki 2), Macondo Mochizuki 3), Masatsune Yamagata 1), Yoshikazu Ikeda 1), Fumitake Nakajima 1)

Early Radiological Analysis of Cervical Arthroplasty with Bryan and Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis

Prognosis of neurological deficits associated with upper cervical spine injuries

Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment following central cervical corpectomy: magnetic resonance imaging study evidence

Original Article Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2013;5:

We performed CT myelography in 38 patients

Case Report Adjacent Lumbar Disc Herniation after Lumbar Short Spinal Fusion

Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Giant schwannoma with extensive scalloping of the lumbar vertebral body treated with one-stage posterior surgery: a case report

Spinal Imaging. ssregypt.com. Mamdouh Mahfouz MD

Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring with Tce-MEP for cervical laminoplasty

Neck Pain: Help! Eric M. Massicotte, MD, MSc, MBA, FRCSC Associate Professor University of Toronto

Key words: Professional Med J 2018;25(8): CERVICAL LAMINOPLASTY

Report for the APOA- Depuy Spine Clinical Fellowship 2014

Yoshii et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (2017) 12:12 DOI /s

Indications for cervical spine immobilisation: -

CSM is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction

Symptomatic ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament with stenosis of the cervical spine

CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS & CERVICAL DISC DISEASE

Subaxial Cervical Spine Trauma

A Structural Service Plan: Towards Better and Safer Spine Surgeries. Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology Tuen Mun Hospital

Range of motion of thoracic spine in sagittal plane

Prognostic factors for surgical outcome in spinal cord injury associated with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)

흉추척수증을유발한황색인대골화증의골절 - 증례보고 -

Case SCIWORA in patient with congenital block vertebra

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a progressive

Life expectancy after cervical laminoplasty Causes of the fatal prognosis at the early stage (within 5 years)

Transcription:

Acta Orthop. Belg., 2014, 80, 567-574 ORIGINAL STUDY Is OPLL-induced canal stenosis a risk factor of cord injury in cervical trauma? Kyung-Jin Song, Chan-Il Park, Do-Yeon Kim, Young-Ran Jung, Kwang-Bok Lee From Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea The purpose of this study is to identify the relationship between trauma severity and the degree of cord injury in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Four-hundred-one patients were classified into Group A (OPLL(+)), Group B (spinal stenosis (+) and OPLL(-)), and Group C (OPLL (-) and spinal stenosis(-)). Trauma severity and neurological injury severity were compared according to presence of OPLL and spinal stenosis. OPLL was associated with a higher incidence of neurological injury with statistical significance (p = 0.002), whereas spinal stenosis did not (p = 0.408). With Group B+C (no OPLL group) in M (minimal) trauma group as baseline, Group A in M trauma group showed about 5 times, and Group A in S (severe) trauma group showed about 16 times as many cord injury. Patients with OPLL more frequently sustained spinal cord injury from minimal trauma. Key word : ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament ; spinal cord injury ; incidence ; injury severity score. Introduction Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) chiefly occurs in Japan, Korea and China (4,6,16) and mainly involves cervical spine. Posterior longitudinal ligament is ossified into the spinal canal and protrudes to compress spinal cord or nerve root, which consequently causes various neurological symptoms. These symptoms may slowly develop as paraplegia or quadriplegia, causing permanent neurological deficit (13). Several studies have evaluated spinal stenosis as a potential contributor to severe cord injury in lowenergy trauma (8,12). However, there is no objective definition of minor and major trauma in these reports. We used injury severity score (ISS) to stage the extent of injury (1). The maximum score of ISS is 75 points, and point ranges of 0-7, 8-16, 17-25 and > 26 are considered as minor trauma, moderate trauma, severe trauma, and very severe trauma, respectively (11). n Kyung-Jin Song. n Chan-Il Park. n Do-Yeon Kim. n Young-Ran Jung. n Kwang-Bok Lee. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea. Correspondence : Kwang-Bok Lee, 634-18, Keumam-dong, Jeonju-shi, Chonbuk, South Korea. E-mail : osdr2815@naver.com 2014, Acta Orthopædica Belgica. No benefits or funds were received in support of this study. The authors report no conflict of interests.

568 k.-j. song, c.-i. park, d.-y. kim, y.-r. jung, k.-b. lee It is generally accepted that surgical treatment is not mandatory for cord compression from ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in the absence of relevant neurological symptoms (12). However, clinicians in the East Asian countries often manage patients with OPLL who sustain permanent neurological injury such as complete cord injury despite low-energy trauma. Patients with OPLL seem to experience more severe neurological injury compared to patients without OPLL, given similar trauma severity. So far, there is no report on the relationship between trauma severity and neurological injury severity in patients with OPLL-induced canal stenosis. Therefore, the authors assessed the severity of neurological injury in patients with OPLL, examined the incidence of OPLL in patients who had undergone surgical treatment due to cervical spine trauma, and compared trauma severity and neurological injury severity according to presence of OPLL. Material and Methods This study included 401 patients, who had undergone surgical treatments for cervical spine trauma accompanying neurological injury from May, 2000 to January, 2012. Medical records and radiologic studies were reviewed retrospectively. The mean age was 52.7 years (ranging from 19 to 81 years), and there were 316 males (79%) and 85 females (21%). The patients were assigned into Group A (patients with OPLL, the OPLL group ), Group B (patients with spinal stenosis in the absence of OPLL, the Stenosis group ) and Group C (patients without both OPLL and spinal stenosis, the No OPLL and Stenosis group ). OPLL was diagnosed with computed tomography (CT), and spinal stenosis was diagnosed when Pavlov ratio was less than 0.8. Neurological injury severity was divided into spinal cord injury and non-spinal cord injury. Trauma severity was assessed using the injury severity score (ISS) (1). The maximum score of ISS is 75 points, and point ranges 0-7, 8-16, 17-25 and greater than 26 are considered as minor trauma, moderate trauma, severe trauma and very severe trauma, respectively (11). The authors defined Group M (minimal) to include minor and moderate trauma and Group S (severe) to include severe and very severe trauma (Table I). Groups A, B, and C included 52 patients (12.8%), 223 patients (64%) and 126 patients (36%), respectively. Groups M and S included 336 patients (84%) and 65 patients (16%), respectively. Group A has 46 patients (88.5%) in Group M and 6 patients (11.5%) in Group S. Group B has 186 patients (83.4%) in Group M and 37 patients (16.6%) in Group S. Group C has 104 patients (82.5%) in Group M and 22 patients (17.5%) in Group S. Group B+C (without OPLL) has 290 patients (83.1%) in Group M and 59 patients (16.9%) in Group S (Table I). There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, and ISS across the groups (Fisher s exact test, p = 1.000, p = 0.772, p < 0.001). Trauma severity and neurological injury severity were compared according to the presence of OPLL and spinal stenosis (Table II). Fisher s exact test and multiple regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results 1. Incidence of spinal cord injury according to absence/presence of OPLL and spinal stenosis Group A (OPLL group) included 21 patients (40.4%) with spinal cord injury and 31 patients (59.6%) without spinal cord injury. Group B (Stenosis group) included 46 patients (20.6%) with spinal cord injury and 177 patients (79.4%) without spinal cord injury. In case of Group C (No OPLL and Stenosis group), there were 26 patients (20.6%) with spinal cord injury and 100 patients (79.4%) without spinal cord injury. Group B+C (No OPLL) included 72 patients (20.6%) with spinal cord injury and 277 patients (79.4%) without spinal cord injury (Table II). In comparison according to absence/ presence of OPLL, the incidence of spinal cord injury was higher for Group A than for Group B+C with statistical significance (Fisher s exact test, p = 0.003). In comparison according to absence/ presence of spinal stenosis (Group B vs. Group C), differences in spinal cord did not reach statistical significance between the groups (p = 0.454, Table II). In multiple regression analysis, OPLL was associated with higher incidence of neurological injury with statistical significance (multiple regression analysis, cruded OR 2.606, 95% CI 1.414-4.804, Adjusted OR 4.024, 95% CI 2.030-7.976), whereas spinal stenosis was not (Cruded OR 1.236, 95% CI 0.749-2.040, p = 0.408, Table III).

cord injury in servical trauma 569 Table I. Spinal cord injury according to trauma severity OPLL* OPLL(-) Spinal stenosis No stenosis Toal Number 52 223 126 401 None 2 100.0% 31 100.0% 32 100.0% ISS** mild Cord injury 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Total 2 31 32 65 None 27 61.4% 135 87.1% 60 83.3% ISS moderate Cord injury 17 38.6% 20 12.9% 12 16.7% Total 44 155 72 271 None 29 63.0% 166 89.2% 92 88.5% M group Cord injury 17 37.0% 20 10.8% 12 11.5% (ISS mild, moderate) Total 46 186 104 336 None 2 40.0% 11 31.4% 8 36.4% ISS severe Cord injury 3 60.0% 24 68.6% 14 63.6% Total 5 35 22 62 None 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 ISS Cord injury 1 100.0% 2 100.0% 0 very severe Total 1 2 0 3 None 2 33.3% 11 29.7% 8 36.4% S group Cord injury 4 66.7% 26 70.3% 14 63.6% (ISS severe, very severe) Total 6 37 22 65 *OPLL : Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament. **ISS : Injury severity score. 2. Incidence of spinal cord injury according to absence/presence of OPLL and trauma severity In cases of minimal (M group) trauma, Group A (OPLL group) included 29 patients (63%) without spinal cord injury and 17 patients (37%) with spinal cord injury. Group B (Stenosis group) included 166 patients (89.2%) without spinal cord injury and 20 patients (10.8%) with spinal cord injury. Group C (No OPLL and Stenosis group) included 92 patients (88.5%) without spinal cord injury and 12 patients (11.5%) with spinal cord injury. Group B+C (No OPLL) included 258 patients (89%) without spinal cord injury and 32 patients (11%) with spinal cord injury. These findings indicate OPLL group experienced higher incidence of cord injury compared to no OPLL group in the setting of minimal trauma. In cases of severe (S group) trauma, Group A included 2 patients (33.3%) without spinal cord injury and 4 patients (66.7%) with spinal cord injury. Group B included 11 patients (29.7%) without cord injury and 26 patients (70.3%) with spinal cord injury. Group C included 8 patients (36.4%) without spinal cord injury and 14 patients (63.4%) with spinal cord injury. Group B+C included 19 patients (32.2%) without spinal cord injury and 40 patients (67.8%) with spinal cord injury. S trauma group was associated with significantly higher incidence of spinal cord injury compared to M trauma group (Cruded OR 12.272, 95% CI 6.724-122.399, Adjusted OR 14.681, 95% CI 7.832-29.518, Table III). These findings indicate there is a higher incidence of cord injury in the setting of sever trauma, independent of OPLL. With Group B+C (no OPLL group) in M trauma group as the baseline, Group A in M trauma group showed about 5 times as many spinal cord injury (Adjusted OR 4.753, 95% CI 2.351-9.607,

570 k.-j. song, c.-i. park, d.-y. kim, y.-r. jung, k.-b. lee ISS** Neurology Table II. Statistical analysis of trauma and spinal cord injury severity across the groups OPLL OPLL (-) Spinal stenosis No stenosis Total Mild 2 (3.8%) 31 (13.9%) 32 (25.4%) 65 (16.2%) Moderate 44 (84.6%) 155 (69.5%) 72 (57.1%) 271 (67.6%) Severe 5 (9.6%) 35 (15.7%) 22 (17.5%) 62 (15.5%) Very severe 1 (1.9%) 2 (0.9%) 0 3 (1%) Cord injury 21 (40.4%) 46 (20.6%) 26 (20.6%) 93 (23.2%) None 31 (59.6%) 177 (79.4%) 100 (79.4%) 308 (76.8%) Complete cord injury 3 (5.8%) 5 (2.2%) 2 (1.6%) 10 (2.5%) P value 0.003 0.454 Statistical analysis by Fisher s exact test. *OPLL : Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament. **ISS : Injury severity score. P value < 0.001 Age, 65 (ref. <65) Sex, Male (ref. female) Table III. Analysis of factors influencing spinal cord injury Crude OR 95% CI p value Adjusted OR 95% CI p value 1.016 0.588-1.754 0.956 0.899 0.514-1.572 0.71 Spinal stenosis 1.236 0.749-2.040 0.408 OPLL (+) 2.606 1.414-4.804 0.002 4.024 2.030-7.976 < 0.001 S group* 12.272 6.724-122.399 < 0.001 14.681 7.832-29.518 < 0.001 Statistical analysis by Multiple logistic regression. *S group : ISS severe, very severe. p < 0.001), Group A in S trauma group had about 16 times (Adjusted OR 16.384, 95% CI 2.862-93.766, p = 0.002) and Group B+C 17 in S trauma group had about 17 times (Adjusted OR 16.974, 95% CI 8.777-32.829, p < 0.001) the spinal cord injury frequency (Table IV, Fig. 1). Discussion Most patients with OPLL present with slowly progressing symptoms of spinal cord compression. However, these symptoms tend be acutely exacerbated when accompanied by trauma. Katoh et al have reported that symptoms from spinal cord compression were aggravated after trauma in 16.9% of OPLL patients. This rate was reported to be as high as 28.5% depending on the publication reviewed (9, 12,17). The incidence of OPLL is known to be 2% in the East Asian population (7), whereas the incidence of OPLL in patients who underwent surgical treatment for cervical spine trauma was 12.8% in this study, which is significantly higher than those previously reported. This suggests that patients with OPLL are at a higher risk of spinal cord injury requiring surgical treatment among after cervical spine injury. In this study, OPLL was found to be significantly associated with the occurrence of spinal cord injury, whereas spinal stenosis alone was not. Several studies have reported that both OPLL and spinal stenosis influence trauma-related spinal cord injury. However, this study showed that spinal stenosis

cord injury in servical trauma 571 M group* S group** Table IV. Comparison of spinal cord injuries according to trauma severity and OPLL Adjusted OR 95% CI p value OPLL (-) 1 OPLL (+) 4.753 2.351-9.607 < 0.001 OPLL (-) 16.974 8.777-32.829 < 0.001 OPLL (+) 16.384 2.862-93.766 0.002 Statistical analysis by Multiple logistic regression as reference M group and OPLL(-). *M group : ISS mild, moderate. **S group : ISS severe, very severe. without OPLL has no effect on spinal cord injury. In the setting of spinal stenosis without OPLL, the ability to absorb or disperse a given force is normal because segmental mobility is intact. In contrast, dispersion of external force is decreased in the presence of OPLL because of limited segmental mobility from ossification, thus leading to more severe spinal cord injury. In this study, there were 3 cases (5.8%), 5 cases (2.2%) and 2 cases (1.6%) of complete spinal cord injury in OPLL group (Group A), Stenosis group (Group B) and No OPLL and Stenosis group (Group C), respectively. Even though the differences in incidence were not statistically significant due to the small number of sample, it is probably that the incidence of complete spinal cord injury is higher for patients with OPLL. Several studies have addressed the risk of severe spinal cord injury in patients with OPLL and spinal stenosis after minor trauma (12,17,18). Katoh et al (12) defined minor trauma as a fall on the level, traffic accident, struck by an object, and fall from a height of less than 2 meters without suffering a direct injury to the neck. Yoo et al (18) defined minor trauma as falling down (< 2 meters in height), slipping down, motor vehicle accident, struck by objects and sport activities. However, categorizations of injury severity were not objective since those were based on subjective assessment of clinicians. Therefore, evaluation of neurologic injury severity in minor trauma and OPLL seemed to lack reliability. The authors quantified trauma severity using the Injury Severity Score (ISS) in order to provide objective criteria on minor trauma (1,11). The authors evaluated trauma severity in an objective manner using ISS and compared spinal cord injury severity in OPLL patients. Our results show that with Group B+C (absence of OPLL) in minimal (M) trauma as the baseline, group with OPLL in minimal trauma showed 5 times, Group B+C (absence of OPLL) in severe trauma showed 17 times, and group with OPLL in severe trauma showed 16 times the frequency of spinal cord injury (Table IV). Interestingly, these findings indicate that in the M trauma group, OPLL caused more spinal cord injury with statistical significance compare to no OPLL. However, OPLL did not have statistically significant results in S trauma group, which implies that trauma severity is more closely related to spinal cord injury than presence of OPLL in S trauma group and that OPLL is a more important cause of higher incidence of than no OPLL in minimal trauma. Therefore, clinicians should always be aware of spinal cord injury and perform thorough examinations on spinal cord injury in patients who have sustained severe trauma in the emergency room, regardless of presence of OPLL. In cases of less severe trauma, clinicians should meticulously evaluate radiologic and CT images in order to detect OPLL and anticipate higher possibility of spinal cord injury in the presence of OPLL. OPLL can be classified into localized type, segmental type, continuous type, and mixed type, using simple radiological images (17). Spinal cord injury had occurred to 6 patients of localized type (28.6%), 7 patients of segmental type (33.3%), 4 patients of continuous type (19%) and 4 patients of mixed type (19%). On the other hand, no spinal cord injury had occurred in 11 patients of localized type (35.5%), 18 patients of segmental type (58.1%), 1 patient of continuous type (3.2%) and 1 patient of mixed type (3.2%). Statistical analysis was not possible due to

572 k.-j. song, c.-i. park, d.-y. kim, y.-r. jung, k.-b. lee A B C D E F Fig. 1. Preoperative C-spine lateral X-ray (A), sagittal and axial CT (B), and sagittal and axial T2-weighted MRI (C) of complete cord injury in OPLL patient by minor trauma. Postoperative C-spine lateral X-ray showing posterior fusion and stabilization with rod and screws construct (D) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with PEEK cages (E). Follow-up C-spine lateral X-ray showing good alignment and construct status (F).

cord injury in servical trauma 573 insufficient number of samples. Classification of cervical OPLL does not seem to be related to spinal cord injury because localized and segmental types were found in both spinal cord injury and without spinal cord injury. Ages, duration of symptoms, and preoperative neurological deficit are considered to be prognostic factors of cervical OPLL. Patients aggravated by trauma are reported to have much worse post-operative results than those who were not. Even a minor injury can cause irreversible cord damage in the setting of pre-existing spinal compression, which can result in poor post-operative results. Furthermore, secondary injuries from free radical, ischemic change, hemorrhage, or edema cause irreversible damage to the spinal cord (2,3,10,14). Some studies have reported that neurologic symptoms improved after surgery in OPLL patients who were aggravated by trauma (4,15). In general, treatment of OPLL resulted in poorer outcomes when associated with trauma (5). Asymptomatic OPLL patients can experience poor neurological recovery after a minor trauma. Thus, this potential for neurologic sequelae of minor trauma should be considered in patients with OPLL. The limitation of this study is that the authors only included cases of surgical treatments after trauma and excluded cases of non-operative management. OPLL patients did not require surgical treatment in the absence of neurologic symptoms. Further prospective studies including all patients with cervical spine trauma are expected. Conclusion There was a high incidence of spinal cord injury in the setting of severe trauma, regardless of OPLL status. However, patients with OPLL more frequently sustained spinal cord injury from minimal trauma. Therefore, clinicians should caution patients with OPLL of the potential for cord injury even with low-energy trauma. Acknowledgements This study was funded by the Biomedical Research Institute at Chonbuk National University Hospital (CNUH-BRI-2012-02-005). References 1. Baker SP, O Neill B, Haddon W, Jr., Long WB. The injury severity score : a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. The Journal of trauma 1974 ; 14 (3) : 187-96. 2. Braughler JM, Duncan LA, Chase RL. Interaction of lipid peroxidation and calcium in the pathogenesis of neuronal injury. Central nervous system trauma : journal of the American Paralysis Association 1985 ; 2 (4) : 269-83. 3. Braughler JM, Hall ED. Central nervous system trauma and stroke. I. Biochemical considerations for oxygen radical formation and lipid peroxidation. Free radical biology & medicine 1989 ; 6 (3) : 289-301. 4. Cheng WC, Chang CN, Lui TN, Lee ST, Wong CW, Lin TK. Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. Surgical neurology 1994 ; 41 (2) : 90-7. 5. Chin D, Jin B, Cho Y, Yoon D, Kim Y. Influence of Trauma on the Surgical Outcome in Patients with Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament of the Cervical Spine. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2000 ; 29 : 904. 6. Chin WS, Oon CL. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine. The British journal of radiology 1979 ; 52 (623) : 865-9. 7. Ehara S, Shimamura T, Nakamura R, Yamazaki K. Paravertebral ligamentous ossification : DISH, OPLL and OLF. European journal of radiology 1998 ; 27 (3) : 196-205. 8. Eismont FJ, Clifford S, Goldberg M, Green B. Cervical sagittal spinal canal size in spine injury. Spine 1984 ; 9 (7) : 663-6. 9. Fujimura Y, Nakamura M, Toyama Y. Influence of minor trauma on surgical results in patients with cervical OPLL. Journal of spinal disorders 1998 ; 11 (1) : 16-20. 10. Hall ED, Braughler JM. Central nervous system trauma and stroke. II. Physiological and pharmacological evidence for involvement of oxygen radicals and lipid peroxidation. Free radical biology & medicine 1989 ; 6 (3) : 303-13. 11. Johnson KM, Lawson KA, Yuma-Guerrero P, Prince M, Maxson RT. Pediatric injuries in central Texas. Texas medicine 2009 ; 105 (9) : e1. 12. Katoh S, Ikata T, Hirai N, Okada Y, Nakauchi K. Influence of minor trauma to the neck on the neurological outcome in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine. Paraplegia 1995 ; 33 (6) : 330-3. 13. Kim YS, Chin DK, Cho YE et al. Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 1997 ; 26 (9) : 1237-45. 14. rozario RA, Levine H, Stein BM. Cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy secondary to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Surgical neurology 1978 ; 10 (1) : 17-20.

574 k.-j. song, c.-i. park, d.-y. kim, y.-r. jung, k.-b. lee 15. Shibasaki H, Nagamatsu K. Calcification of the posterior longitudinal ligament : its relation with cervical spondylosis. Clin Neurol 1968 ; 7 : 22-9. 16. soo YS, Sachdev AS. Calcification in the posterior longitudinal ligament as a cause of cervical myelopathy. The Medical journal of Australia 1971 ; 1 (14) : 743-4. 17. Tsuyama N. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1984 ; (184) : 71-84. 18. Yoo DS, Lee SB, Huh PW, Kang SG, Cho KS. Spinal cord injury in cervical spinal stenosis by minor trauma. World neurosurgery 2010 ; 73 (1) : 50-2 ; discussion e4.