Douglas J. Simpkin, Ph.D. Aurora St. Luke s Medical Center Milwaukee, Wisconsin. www.

Similar documents
Site Planning and Design of PET/CT Facilities. Melissa C. Martin, M.S., FACR, FAAPM AAPM Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL August 2, 2006

Dollars and Sense: Are We Overshielding Imaging Facilities? Part 2

AAPM Task Group 108: PET and PET/CT Shielding Requirements

Shielding of Medical Facilities. Shielding Desing Considerations for PET-CT Facilities. Cruzate, J.A. and Discacciatti, A.P.

Radiation Exposure to Staff Using PET/CT Facility

Shielding Design Basis and its Calculation of High Energy Medical Linac Installed in Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, Bangladesh

Description of the consecutive stages (which took place from December 2002 to July 2003)

Medical Physics 4 I3 Radiation in Medicine

Quiz True/False: Large amounts of radiation to insects will cause them to mutate!

2017 Course of the Nordic Association for Clinical Physics on occupational dosimetry in hospitals

Introduction Pediatric malignancies Changing trends & Radiation burden Radiation exposure from PET/CT Image gently PET & CT modification - PET/CT

Typical PET Image. Elevated uptake of FDG (related to metabolism) Lung cancer example: But where exactly is it located?

Module Rhodes

Radiation Safety For Anesthesiologists. R2 Pinyada Pisutchareonpong R2 Nawaporn Sateantantikul Supervised by Aj Chaowanan Khamtuicrua

Austin Radiological Association Ga-68 NETSPOT (Ga-68 dotatate)

Patient self-attenuation and technologist dose in positron emission tomography

Multiple Choice Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Why is CT Dose of Interest?

SHIELDING TECHNIQUES FOR CURRENT RADIATION THERAPY MODALITIES

Tracking Doses in the Pediatric Population

FDG-18 PET/CT - radiation dose and dose-reduction strategy

3/5/2015. Don t Electrocute Me!: Common Misconceptions in Imaging and Radiation Safety (and What to Do About Them)

PRINCIPLES AND METHODS OF RADIATION PROTECTION

PHY138Y Nuclear and Radiation

Bone Densitometry Radiation dose: what you need to know

Dental ConeBeam Computed Tomography (CBCT) X-ray Systems

Radiopharmaceuticals. Radionuclides in NM. Radionuclides NUCLEAR MEDICINE. Modes of radioactive decays DIAGNOSTIC THERAPY CHEMICAL COMPOUND

Shielding Calculation: Radiographic Room. Jerry Williams

Paediatric Dose Reduction and Image Quality

Austin Radiological Association BRAIN AMYLOID STUDY (F-18-Florbetapir)

4D PET: promises and limitations

OPTION I TEST REVIEW

The Basics of Radiation Safety

Calculation of Effective Doses for Radiotherapy Cone-Beam CT and Nuclear Medicine Hawkeye CT Laura Sawyer

PHYSICS 2: HSC COURSE 2 nd edition (Andriessen et al) CHAPTER 20 Radioactivity as a diagnostic tool (pages 394-5)

IORT with mobile linacs: the Italian experience

Radiation Safety Training Module: Diagnostic Radiology Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology

Radiation Safety Manual

Measurement of organ dose in abdomen-pelvis CT exam as a function of ma, KV and scanner type by Monte Carlo method

The x-rays produced penetrate the body which absorbs, refracts, or reflects the x-ray beam energy depending on the tissue. Bone

Introduction. Chapter 15 Radiation Protection. Advisory bodies. Regulatory bodies. Main Principles of Radiation Protection

45 Hr PET Registry Review Course

Radiation Safety for New Medical Physics Graduate Students

KEYWORDS: positron emission tomography, occupational dose, real time dose monitoring

Code of Practice for Radiation Protection in Dentistry. Code of Practice For Radiation Protection in Dentistry

Validation of the MEDRAD Intego PET Infusion System in the Clinical Nuclear Medicine Setting

Photon Attenuation Correction in Misregistered Cardiac PET/CT

Study the Primary Barrier of the Digital Chest X-Ray Room of Al-Hussaini Hospital in Karbala City, Iraq

PET ID: [<P4T> However, if sheet says PCT, then old scanner was used, change to PCT] [number]

Radiation Protection: A Review

Radiation physics and radiation protection. University of Szeged Department of Nuclear Medicine

Translating Protocols Across Patient Size: Babies to Bariatric

Radiation Protection: Are We Doing Enough To Protect Our Patients and Staff?

Skyscan 1076 in vivo scanning: X-ray dosimetry

Assessment of effective dose in paediatric CT examinations

Basic radiation protection & radiobiology

Table of Contents. Introduction 3. Background 4

Radiation Protection in Laboratory work. Mats Isaksson, prof. Department of radiation physics, GU

International Radiation Protection Association EYE DOSE GUIDANCE (and EPRI Workshop) -- SPRING

8/18/2011. Acknowledgements. Managing Pediatric CT Patient Doses INTRODUCTION

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

Standardization of Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry

Imaging Rotation. University of Michigan Department of Radiation Oncology Division of Radiation Physics. Resident:

Austin Radiological Association Nuclear Medicine Procedure PET SODIUM FLUORIDE BONE SCAN (F-18 NaF)

Mapping the ASRT Objectives for Radiation Protection (47 Objectives) and Radiation Biology (21 Objectives) to this Text

Outline. Lifetime Attributable Risk 10 mgy in 100,000 exposed persons (BEIR VII 2006) SPECT/CT and PET/CT Dosimetry

Cone Beam CT Protocol Optimisation for Prostate Imaging with the Varian Radiotherapy OBI imaging system. Dr Craig Moore & Dr Tim Wood

Assoc Prof Sl. Ushev. Phys S. Ivanova*, Prof Dr A. Klisarova*,, Assoc Prof A. Artinya. yan,

Pitfalls and Remedies in PET/CT imaging for RT planning

Radiation Safety Information for Students in Courses given by the Nuclear Physics Group at KTH, Stockholm, Sweden

A study of beam loss pattern & dose distribution

Utilize radiation safety principles to reduce the amount of radiation used to achieve desired clinical result.

Modelling the effect of lead and other materials for shielding of the fetus in CT pulmonary angiography

Breast Cancer PET/CT Imaging Protocol

Integrated PET/CT systems State of the art and Clinical Applications

Simulations of Preclinical andclinical Scans in Emission Tomography, Transmission Tomography and Radiation Therapy. Using GATE

To Shield or Not to Shield? Lincoln L. Berland, M.D.

RADIATION SAFETY DIRECTORATE

BioMedical quantitative X-Ray Imaging. Emmanuel Brun Researcher Inserm Université Grenoble Alpes

Acknowledgments. A Specific Diagnostic Task: Lung Nodule Detection. A Specific Diagnostic Task: Chest CT Protocols. Chest CT Protocols

Variation of Occupational Doses among Subspecialties in Diagnostic Radiology. A.N. Al-Haj, C.S. Lagarde, A.M. Lobriguito

X-Ray & CT Physics / Clinical CT

CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction

Survey of Radiation Dose Levels in Patients in X-Ray Units of Some Selected Hospitals in Jos Metropolis

Toshiba Aquillion 64 CT Scanner. Phantom Center Periphery Center Periphery Center Periphery

Now offering a Real-time dose measurement system featuring RaySafe i3. Powered by

Estimation of the effective dose to the radiologists during fluoroscopy or angiography of abdominal viscera

Introduction and Background

RaySafe i3. Visualize your radiation exposure in real time.

X-Ray Safety Awareness Handbook

Colour on-line figures None Colour print figures None

RADIATION PROTECTION SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF WELLBEING, SAFETY AND HEALTH

Adult: > 18 Years ALARA: As low as reasonably achievable ALI:

Now offering a subscription based real-time dose measurement system featuring RaySafe i3. Powered by

PERSONNEL MONITORING AND DOSIMETRY POLICIES

Bureau of Laboratory Quality Standards

Managing Radiation Risk in Pediatric CT Imaging

AN INTRODUCTION TO NUCLEAR MEDICINE

Fetal Dose Calculations and Impact on Patient Care

Cardiac PET. John Buscombe

Transcription:

PET/CT Shielding Design Examples Douglas J. Simpkin, Ph.D. Aurora St. Luke s Medical Center Milwaukee, Wisconsin dsimpkin@wi.rr.com www. http://geocities.com/djsimpkin 1

Sources of Exposure: F-18 in Patients Task Group 108 recommends a realistic Effective Dose Rate Constant Γ for F-18 in patient: Γ = 0.09 09 µsv m MBq - 1 h -1 Assume all photons emitted from patient are 511 kev

Time determines Dose Rate Then Dose Rate D at distance r (m) from activity A (MBq) is D = Γ A r The Dose, D, accumulated over time t is 0.693 t t = T1/ 1.44 D T1 / 1 e D And track decay of activity from moment-to-moment 1/ A ( t ) = A e 0 0.693 t T 3

The patient is the source FDG patient is in incubation (in an quiet, isolated room) for ~45 minutes. Shielding gfor this room must be considered. Patient in scanner for 30-60 minutes. Shielding for scanner room must be considered. 4

Shielding People to P/T In uncontrolled areas in USA Must restrict dose in any one hour to < 0.0 msv and Must restrict annual dose to < regulated limit of 1 msv y -1 Controlled areas in USA (For pregnant workers), must restrict annual occupational dose to 5 msv y -1 5

Corridor Outside Uptake Room Presume the patient is injected with 555 MBq 18 F. The patient remains quiescent in the Uptake Room for 45 minutes. At 3 m (to the corridor) the initial dose rate upon injection at is µ Sv m 0.09 555 MBq A MBq h Γ D0 = = = 0. 0057 r 3 m msv ( ) h So in the USA, 0.0 0 msv in any h is satisfied 6

D Corridor Outside Uptake Room Assume 40 PET patients per week = 080 patients per year The annual unshielded dose in the corridor outside the uptake room is then 0.693 pat msv = 1.83h 080 1.44 0.0057 1.83h 1 e y h msv = 7.7 y.75h 7

Corridor Outside Uptake Room If the corridor is uncontrolled, P=1 msv y -1 and T for the wall is = 1/5, so P/T = 5mSvy -1 The wall must be shielded so B = 5 / 7. = 0.69, which requires 3 mm thick Pb. The door has an occupancy factor T = 1/8, so that t P/T = 8 msv y -1. Since the unshielded d dose is 7. msv y -1, the door needs no shielding. 8

Office Above Uptake Room Consider a fully occupied (T=1) uncontrolled (P=1 msv y -1 ) office 3.5 m above Uptake Room. The initial dose rate is µ Sv m 0.0909 555 MBq A MBq h msv D Γ 0 = = = 0. 004 r 3. 5 m ( ) h So again, 0.0 msv in any 1 h is satisfied 9

D Office Above Uptake Room For 080 patients per year, the annual dose in the office is then 0.693 pat msv.75h = 1.83h 080 1.44 0.004 1.83h 1 e y msv = 5.65 y The ceiling must provide shielding, with B = 1 msv y -1 / 5.65 msv y -1 = 0.177. This requires 15.6 cm std density concrete h 10

Office Above Uptake Room In my facility, the ceiling was only 7.6 cm thick. Thus we had to add the equivalent of 15.6-7.6 = 8 cm of concrete = 8 cm / cm =0.36 TVL. This required 0.36 1.8 cm Pb = 0.65 cm Pb to be added to the concrete ceiling. 11

PET/CT Scanner Room Note: Activity in patient will have decayed in uptake room (i.e. from ~555 MBq on injection to ~40 MBq when patient enters scanner) 1

Office adjacent to PET/CT Scanner Fully occupied uncontrolled area, shield to P/T = 1mSvy -1 /1= 1mSvy -1 At 3.5 m distance, with initially 40 MBq in patient µ Sv m 0.09 40 MBq A MBq h D Γ 0 = = = 0. 003 r 3.5 m msv ( ) h 13

Office adjacent to PET/CT Scanner D For 080 patients per year, the annual dose in the office for a 45 min scan is then 0.693 pat msv.75h = 1.83h 080 1.44 0.003 1.83h 1 e y msv = 4.3 y The wall must provide shielding, with B = 1 msv y -1 / 4.3 msv y -1 = 0.3. This requires 1.1 1 cm Pb in the wall. h 14

PET/CT scanner Patient in scanner 0.5 1h D PET done: 3-4 min/bed stop, 15 cm coverage/stop, 47 3.7mm slices/stop CT done for Anatomical co-registration of PET images Attenuation correction of PET images For cancer patients typically scan from eye to thigh 15

PET/CT Scanner Typical (GE Discovery ST) CT scan technique: (8 row scanner) 100-175 ma, 140 kvp, 0.8 sec/rot, 3.75mm thick slices, pitch = 1.675:1 cm beam width 16

PET/CT Scanner Methods for shielding CT scanners are in NCRP-147 Determine unshielded dose based on Manufacturer s isoexposure curves Scatter factor applied to CTDI Height of patient scanned ma Consider that CT may be used as a stand-alone scanner 17

Calculate B to reduce dose to P/T Look up barrier thickness required to achieve that transmission CT typ. requires 1 to mm Pb PET/CT Scanner Tra ansmission 1E+0 8 6 1E-1 8 6 6 Transmission of CT Scanner 4 Secondary Radiation Through Pb 4 1E- 8 6 4 1E-3 8 6 10 kvp 140 kvp Fitting parameters to Equation B. kvp α (mm -1 ) β (mm -1 ) γ 10.46 5.73 0.547 140.009 3.99 0.34 Lead Thickness (mm) 13 cm concrete 1E-4 4 0 0.5 1 1.5.5 3 18

PET: Shielding PET AND CT Lower unshielded dose rates Penetrating photons require an order of magnitude thicker barriers than the CT scan CT Much higher unshielded dose rates All persons entering scanner room while x ray is on must wear a Pb apron Low energy x rays require much thinner barriers. 19

Shielding PET AND CT Shielding requirements for F-18 in the patient predominates ( ~ 0.5 cm Pb) However, the CT scanner will ~always require some shielding in all barriers ( ~1 - mmpb) (For example, as with the uptake room, the door to the scanner room may not require shielding for F-18, but will require 1- mm Pb for CT) 0

Conclusions The injected patient is the primary source of radiation exposure in the PET facility For 18 FDG, the uptake room and scanner will probably require lead shielding This shielding will often be -10 thicker that what s typically in a diagnostic x-ray room Shielding for the CT scan in a PET/CT scanner must be considered d 1