Keith A. A. Fox on behalf of the ROCKET AF Investigators

Similar documents
Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD and Keith AA Fox, MB ChB

Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD and Keith AA Fox, MB ChB

Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin

Relationship between Center Time in Therapeutic Range and Comparative Treatment Effect of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin: Results from the ROCKET AF Trial

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Clinical Study Synopsis

An international, double-blind, phase III randomized trial. Main Results

Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in 8040 Women Compared with Men with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Edoxaban vs Warfarin for an Average 2.

Disclosure. Financial disclosure: National Advisory Board & Research Grant from Boehringer-Ingelheim

After acute coronary syndromes patients continue to have recurrent ischemic events despite revascularization and dual antiplatelet therapy

Clinical Study Synopsis

Saudi Arabia February Pr Michel KOMAJDA. Université Pierre et Marie Curie Hospital Pitié Salpétrière

D E A R. W Aspirin. AF New Anticoagulants: Todays Aims

FOURIER STUDY GREYLOCK PRESS: CTS PRODUCT SAMPLE - FOURIER YES. Did the study achieve its main objective?

Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation An Asian Perspective. Dr Yap Lok Bin Cardiologist

New Oral Anticoagulant Drugs in the Prevention of DVT

Clinical Study Synopsis

CORONARY: The Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery Off or On Pump Revascularization Study. Results at 1 Year

Antithrombotic Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran Etexilate

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

Anti-thromboticthrombotic drugs

NOAs for stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: potential advantages in the elderly patients. Giancarlo Agnelli

Clinical issues which drug for which patient

Apixaban Versus ASA To Reduce the Risk Of Stroke. Coordinated by Population Health Research institute Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

New Study Presented at American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions 2016:

Summary of Results for Laypersons

Joshua D. Lenchus, DO, RPh, FACP, SFHM Associate Professor of Medicine and Anesthesiology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

Atrial Fibrillation Topics for Today. Clinical Controversies Management of Atrial Fibrillation. Atrial Fibrillation in the ER Topics for Today

Pros and Cons of Individual Agents Based on Large Trial Results: RELY, ROCKET, ARISTOTLE, AVERROES

Disclosure. Objectives. New Anticoagulants 6/5/2014 GHASSAN HADDAD M.D FHM. South Miami hospital Director of the Anticoagulation clinic.

NUOVI ANTICOAGULANTI NELL ANZIANO: indicazioni e controindicazioni. Mario Cavazza Medicina d Urgenza Pronto Soccorso AOU di Bologna

ADVANCES IN ANTICOAGULATION

Terms and Conditions. VISA Global Customer Assistance Services

Modelling diabetes Professor Alastair Gray Health Economics Research Centre University of Oxford

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Antithrombotics in Stroke management

Design and Analysis of a Cancer Prevention Trial: Plans and Results. Matthew Somerville 09 November 2009

Global EHS Resource Center

Sperm donation Oocyte donation. Hong Kong þ Guideline þ þ Hungary þ þ þ þ Israel þ þ þ þ Italy þ þ þ. Germany þ þ þ þ Greece þ þ þ þ

PCI in Patients with AF Optimizing Oral Anticoagulation Regimen

Global Variations in the 1-year Rates of Death and Stroke in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Atrial Fibrillation

EU Market Situation for Poultry. Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets 20 April 2017

Louisville '19 Attachment #69

WELLNESS COACHING. Wellness & Personal Fitness Solution Providers

Anticoagulation Therapy in LTC

EBBINGHAUS: - A Cognitive Study of Patients Enrolled in the FOURIER Trial

- Network for Excellence in Health Innovation

Injection Techniques Questionnaire (ITQ) WorldWide Results Needle Gauge

Experiences with interim trial monitoring, particularly with early stopped trials

Large observational study to UNderstand the Global impact of Severe Acute respiratory FailurE (LUNG-SAFE)

An Overview of Non Vitamin-K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants. Helen Williams Consultant Pharmacist for CV Disease South London

Old and New Anticoagulants For Stroke Prevention Benefits and Risks

A Patient Unsuitable for VKA Treatment

On behalf of the RE-CIRCUIT Investigators. March 19, :45 am 10:55 am. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Undetectable = Untransmittable. Mariah Wilberg Communications Specialist

Injection Techniques Questionnaire (ITQ) WorldWide Results Insulin Usage

Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of alirocumab in high cardiovascular risk patients: ODYSSEY LONG TERM

TICAGRELOR VERSUS CLOPIDOGREL AFTER THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ST- ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Pharmaceutical, Medical and Health-related Government and Regulatory bodies around the world.

New Aspects in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Antithrombotic Therapy

Debate: New Generation Anti-Coagulation Agents are a Better Choice than Warfarin in the Management of AF

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS

심방세동과최신항응고요법 RACE II AFFIRM 항응고치료는왜중요한가? Rhythm control. Rate control. Anticoagulation 남기병 서울아산병원내과. Clinical Impact of Atrial Fibrillation

On behalf of the RE-CIRCUIT Investigators. March 19, :45 am 10:55 am. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Events after discontinuation of randomized treatment at the end of the ARISTOTLE trial

controversies in anticoagulation: optimizing outcome for atrial fibrillation

Stepheny Sumrall, FNP, AGACNP Cardiovascular Clinic of Hattiesburg

3/19/2012. What is the indication for anticoagulation? Has the patient previously been on warfarin? If so, what % of the time was the INR therapeutic?

Main developments in past 24 hours

New oral factor Xa inhibitors. Lessons from AVERROES and ARISTOTLE trials

Thrombosis and Thromboembolsim October Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Risk Stratification and Choice of Antithrombotic Therapy

Edoxaban. Direct Xa inhibitor Direct thrombin inhibitor Direct Xa inhibitor Direct Xa inhibitor

Indications of Anticoagulants; Which Agent to Use for Your Patient? Marc Carrier MD MSc FRCPC Thrombosis Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

FINAL CDEC RECOMMENDATION

Anticoagulation: Novel Agents

RETROSPECTIVE CLAIMS DATABASE STUDIES OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS (DOACS) FOR STROKE PREVENTION IN NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation

Results from RE-COVER RE-COVER II RE-MEDY RE-SONATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PALLAS. Dronedarone on Top of Standard Therapy. Stuart J. Connolly MD. on behalf of the PALLAS investigators

WELLNESS COACHING. Wellness & Personal Fitness Solution Providers NZ & Australia

Anticoagulation: A Changing Landscape. Kelly Matsuda Pharm.D. July 16, Kelly Matsuda Pharm.D. July 16, 2011

Conflict of interest statement

Effective anticoagulation with factor xa next GEneration in Atrial Fibrillation TIMI 48. Primary Results

Effective anticoagulation with factor xa next GEneration in Atrial Fibrillation TIMI 48. Primary Results

MODULE 1: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Benjamin Bell, MD, FRCPC

Results from RE-LY and RELY-ABLE

What s new with DOACs? Defining place in therapy for edoxaban &

Bayer s Rivaroxaban Demonstrated Superior Protection Against Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism Compared with Aspirin in EINSTEIN CHOICE Study

Men & Health Work. Difference can make a difference Steve Boorman & Ian Banks RSPH Academy 2013

Country-wise and Item-wise Exports of Animal By Products Value Rs. Lakh Quantity in '000 Unit: Kgs Source: MoC Export Import Data Bank

New Strategies in the World of Anticoagulant Therapy. October 13, 2012 Elaine M. Hylek, MD, MPH Boston University Medical Center

Apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. August 2010

Anticoagulation Beyond Coumadin

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 23 September 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta355

Novel Anticoagulants PHYSICIANS UPDATE 2014

New options in Stroke Prevention in AF Paul Dorian University of Toronto St Michael s Hospital

NeuroPI Case Study: Anticoagulant Therapy

The Stabilization Of plaques using Darapladib (SOLID)-TIMI 52 trial: Primary Results

Country Length Discount Travel Period Anguilla All 20% off 08/24/11 12/15/11 Antigua All 20% off 08/24/11 12/15/11 Argentina All 20% off 08/24/11

When and how to combine antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant?

Transcription:

Prevention of Stroke and non-cns Embolism with Compared with in Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation and Moderate Renal Impairment Keith A. A. Fox on behalf of the ROCKET AF Investigators

Disclosures Supported by grants from Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development L.L.C. and Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals An international executive committee designed the trial and was responsible for oversight of study conduct. The committee retained independent ability to analyse and present the data and to take responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of data analyses

Background Direct, specific, competitive Factor Xa inhibitor Half-life: 5 9 hours in young, healthy individuals 11 13 hours in the elderly Clearance: 1/3 direct renal excretion 2/3 metabolism, mainly via CYP 450 enzymes, of which half is excreted renally half is excreted via the biliary-faecal route Oral, once-daily dosing without need for coagulation monitoring Studied in >25,000 patients in post-operative THR or TKR, DVT, PE, medically ill, and ACS patients X Fibrinogen TF/VIIa VIIIa Xa II Va IIa IXa IX Fibrin Adapted from Weitz et al, 2005; 2008

Study Design Atrial Fibrillation Risk Factors Stroke, TIA or Systemic embolus OR CHF Hypertension Age 75 Diabetes At least 2 or 3 required* 20 mg daily 15 mg for Cr Cl 30-49 ml/min Randomized Double Blind / Double Dummy (n ~ 14,000) INR target - 2.5 (2.0-3.0 inclusive) Monthly Monitoring Adherence to standard of care guidelines Primary Endpoint: Stroke or non-cns Systemic Embolism * Enrollment of patients without prior Stroke, TIA or systemic embolism and only 2 factors capped at 10%

Statistical Methods Sample Size event rate ~2.3 Type 1 error 0.05 (2-sided) 405 events; >95% power ~14,000 patients Superiority Non-inferiority Inferiority Better 1.0 1.46 Better Primary Efficacy Evaluation: Stroke or non-cns Embolism (non-inferiority: per-protocol, on treatment) Primary Safety Evaluation: Major or non-major Clinically Relevant Bleeding

Enrollment 45 countries, 1178 sites, 14,264 patients Canada: 750 United States: 1,932 Mexico: 168 Panama: 0 Venezuela: 20 Colombia: 268 Peru: 84 Brazil: 483 Chile: 287 Argentina: 569 Poland: 528 Finland: 16 Lithuania: 245 Sweden: 28 Hungary: 237 Norway: 49 Romania: 783 Czech Rep: 598 Bulgaria: 678 Denmark: 123 Russia: 1,292 Ukraine: 1,011 U.K.: 159 Netherlands: 161 Belgium: 96 Korea: 204 France: 71 China: 496 Spain: 250 Taiwan: 159 Germany: 530 India: 269 Hong Kong: 73 Switzerland: 7 Thailand: 87 Philippines: 368 Austria: 32 Malaysia: 51 Italy: 139 Singapore: 44 Greece: 29 Turkey: 101 Israel: 189 Australia: 242 South Africa: 247 New Zealand: 116

Study Conduct Randomized, n Lost to Follow-up, n Premature Discontinuation, n (%) Withdrew Consent, n Median (25 th, 75 th ) Exposure (days) Median (25 th, 75 th ) Follow-up (days) 7131 18 1691 (23.7) 223 589 (396, 805) 706 (522, 884) 7133 18 1584 (22.2) 224 593 (404, 810) 708 (518, 886)

Cumulative event rate (%) Primary Efficacy Endpoint Stroke and non-cns Embolism 6 5 Event Rate 1.71 2.16 4 3 2 HR (95% CI): 0.79 (0.66, 0.96) 1 P-value Non-Inferiority: <0.001 0 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 No. at risk: 6958 6211 5786 5468 4406 3407 2472 1496 7004 6327 5911 5542 4461 3478 2539 1538 Event rates are % per year Based on Protocol Compliant on Treatment Population Days since Randomization 840

Baseline demographics Characteristic CrCl 30 49 ml/min 15 mg od (N=1474) (N=1476) 20 mg od (N=5637) CrCl 50 ml/min (N=5640) Age, median (IQR), yrs 79 (75 82) 79 (75 83) 71 (63 76) 71 (63 76) Female (%) 55.0 55.9 35.6 35.4 BMI, median (IQR), kg/m 2 25.1 (22.7 28.0) 25.2 (22.8 27.9) 29.2 (26.1 33.0) 28.9 (26.0 32.7) SBP, median (IQR), mm Hg 130 (120 140) 130 (120 140) 130 (120 140) 130 (120 140) Paroxysmal AF (%) 16.6 14.6 17.7 18.7 Prior ASA use (%) 35.9 37.4 36.4 36.5 Prior VKA use (%) 62.7 61.3 62.2 62.9 ASA, acetylsalicylic acid; IQR, interquartile range; VKA, vitamin K antagonist Safety population (minus 9 pts in warfarin arm with no CrCl data)

Baseline demographics (continued) CrCl 30 49 ml/min CrCl 50 ml/min Characteristic 15 mg od (N=1474) (N=1476) 20 mg od (N=5637) (N=5640) CHADS 2 score (mean ± SD) Prior stroke/tia or systemic embolism (%) 3.68 ± 1.00 3.67 ± 1.01 3.42 ± 0.91 3.41 ± 0.92 50.1 49.1 56.2 56.0 Congestive heart failure (%) 66.0 65.3 61.8 61.5 Hypertension (%) 91.7 92.1 89.9 90.4 Diabetes mellitus (%) 31.8 33.3 42.6 41.1 Prior myocardial infarction (%) 18.7 20.5 16.0 17.3 SD, standard deviation; TIA, transient ischaemic attack Safety population (minus 9 pts in warfarin arm with no CrCl data)

Cumulative event rate (%) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Stroke or non-cns embolism among those with CrCl 30 49 ml/min Event Rate 15 mg (INR 2-3) 2.32 2.77 HR (95% CI): 0.84 (0.57, 1.23) 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 Days since Randomization No. at risk: 1434 1226 1103 1027 806 621 442 275 1439 1261 1140 1052 832 656 455 272 Event rates are % per year Based on Protocol Compliant on Treatment Population

Efficacy endpoints on treatment Clinical endpoint (% per year) (N=7111) (N=7116) CrCl 50 ml/min CrCl 30 49 ml/min HR (95% CI) vs warfarin P (interaction) Primary efficacy endpoint* 1.57 2.32 2.00 2.77 0.78 (0.63 0.98) 0.84 (0.57 1.23) 0.76 PE + vascular death 2.76 4.64 3.32 4.83 0.83 (0.70 0.98) 0.96 (0.73 1.27) 0.38 PE + MI, vascular death 3.55 5.58 4.16 6.54 0.85 (0.73 0.99) 0.85 (0.67 1.09) 0.98 Stroke Ischaemic 1.20 1.98 1.34 1.78 0.90 (0.69 1.16) 1.11 (0.71 1.73) 0.41 Haemorrhagic 0.26 0.29 0.42 0.52 0.62 (0.37 1.03) 0.56 (0.21 1.51) 0.88 Undetermined 0.07 0.05 0.10 0.09 0.68 (0.24 1.90) 0.51 (0.05 5.67) 0.84 0.01 0.1 1 10 Based on per-protocol population on treatment *Stroke and systemic embolism 20 mg od. 15 mg od

Safety outcomes Clinical endpoint (% per year) (N=7111) (N=7116) CrCl 50 ml/min CrCl 30 49 ml/min HR (95% CI) vs warfarin P (interaction) Principal safety outcome* 14.24 17.82 13.67 18.28 1.04 (0.96 1.13) 0.98 (0.84 1.14) 0.45 Major bleeding 3.39 4.49 3.17 4.70 1.07 (0.91 1.26) 0.95 (0.72 1.26) 0.48 Hct or Hb drop 2.54 3.76 2.03 3.28 1.25 (1.03 1.52) 1.14 (0.83 1.58) 0.65 Transfusion 1.49 2.34 1.16 2.00 1.28 (0.99 1.65) 1.17 (0.77 1.76) 0.71 Critical organ 0.83 0.76 1.13 1.39 0.74 (0.55 0.99) 0.55 (0.30 1.00) 0.39 Fatal bleeding 0.23 0.28 0.43 0.74 0.55 (0.32 0.93) 0.39 (0.15 0.99) 0.53 Intracranial haemorrhage 0.44 0.71 0.71 0.88 0.62 (0.42 0.92) 0.81 (0.41 1.60) 0.51 0.01 Based on safety population on treatment 0.1 1 10 *Composite of major plus non-major clinically relevant bleeding. 20 mg od. 15 mg od

Bleeding sites Major bleeding (% per year) CrCl 30 49 ml/min 15 mg (N = 1474) (N=1476) CrCl 50 ml/min 20 mg (N=5637) (N=5640) GI (upper, lower, and rectal) 2.88 1.77 1.79 1.12 Intracranial haemorrhage 0.71 0.88 0.44 0.71 Macroscopic haematuria 0.05 0.18 0.28 0.19 Bleeding associated with non-cardiac surgery 0.24 0.42 0.15 0.19 Intra-articular 0.00 0.23 0.18 0.17 Epistaxis 0.19 0.09 0.10 0.13 p=0.02 (riva vs. warf in CrCl 30 49 ml/min); p=0.0002 (riva vs. warf in CrCl 50 ml/min) p=0.02 (riva vs. warf in CrCl 50 ml/min)

Adverse Event (%) Adverse Events* according to Renal Function & Randomised Treatment CrCl 30 49 ml/min Riva 15 mg (N=1474) (N=1476) * Treatment-emergent adverse events with frequency 5% based on rivaroxaban group, plus haematuria Based on safety population on treatment CrCl 50 ml/min Riva 20 mg (N=5637) (N=5640) Total patients 84.7 86.8 80.6 80.1 Epistaxis 10.2 8.2 10.1 8.7 Peripheral oedema 7.8 8.1 5.7 5.7 Dizziness 7.5 8.0 5.7 5.9 Cardiac failure 7.1 8.1 5.2 5.3 Bronchitis 6.4 6.1 5.4 5.8 Diarrhoea 5.7 6.5 5.2 5.3 Dyspnea 5.6 6.9 5.3 5.2 Cough 5.5 5.0 4.6 4.9 Nasopharyngitis 5.2 5.7 6.1 6.5 Arthralgia 5.0 4.7 4.0 4.6 Haematuria 3.2 3.9 4.4 3.2

Conclusions Those with renal dysfunction are at higher risk for stroke and higher risk of bleeding events compared with those without renal dysfunction The outcomes among patients with moderate renal dysfunction were similar for rivaroxaban and warfarin In summary, the reduced dose of rivaroxaban in this patient subgroup yielded efficacy and safety results consistent with the overall trial, with similar rates of bleeding and adverse events and fewer fatal bleeds, compared with warfarin

Study Organization Sponsors J & J and Bayer Christopher Nessel, Kimberly Schwabe, Scott Berkowitz, John Paolini Steering Committee Diego Ardissino, Alvaro Avezum, Phil Aylward, Barbara Biedermann, Christoph Bode, Antonio Carolei, Ramon Corbalan, Laszlo Csiba, Anthony Dalby, Rafael Diaz, Hans Diener, Geoffrey Donnan, Shaun Goodman, Bas Hamer, Hein Heidbuchel, Dai-Yi Hu, Kurt Huber, Gorm Jensen, Matyas Keltai, Basil Lewis, Jose Lopez-Sandon, Jean Louis Mas, Ayrton Massaro, Gordon MacInnes, Bo Norrving, Martin Penicka, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Risto Roine, Tan Ru San, Per Anton Sirnes, Veronika Skvortsova, Gabriel Steg, Harvey White, Lawrence Wong Executive Steering Committee Co-Chairs Keith A. A. Fox Robert M. Califf Duke Clinical Research Institute Jonathan Piccini, Karen Hannan, Jyotsna Garg, Lisa Eskenazi, Angela Kaiser, Patricia Stone Canadian Heart Research Center Shaun Goodman Maggie Godin-Edgecomb IDMC Joe Alpert, Chair Allen Skene, Co-chair Gudrun Boysen John Eikelboom Peter Rothwell CEC Manesh Patel Joni O'Briant Lauren Price

Available now online from European Heart Journal http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/ehr342