Study of the Value of Combined Multiorgan Resection in Surgical Treatment of Carcinoma of the Gastric Cardia

Similar documents
Splenic hilar dissection in the treatment of proximal advanced gastric cancer: what is an adequate strategy?

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Gastric Cancer Histopathology Reporting Proforma

Satisfactory surgical outcome of T2 gastric cancer after modified D2 lymphadenectomy

Surgical Problems in Proximal GI Cancer Management Cardia Tumours Question #1: What are cardia tumours?

NOTE- CRITICAL EVALUATION OF PROPHYLACTIC SPLENECTOMY IN TOTAL GASTRECTOMY FOR THE STOMACH CANCER

Lymph node metastasis in gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma in male patients

Research Article Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Gastric Cancer following Gastrectomy and Extended Lymphadenectomy

Imaging in gastric cancer

POLSKI 2013, 85, 8,

Significance of the lymph nodes in the 7th station in rational dissection for metastasis of distal gastric cancer with different T categories

gastric cancer; lymph node dissection;

Pancreas Quizzes c. Both A and B a. Directly into the blood stream (not using ducts)

Three-dimensional computed tomography simulation for laparoscopic lymph node dissection in the treatment of proximal gastric cancer

Laparoscopic spleen-preserving complete splenic hilum lymphadenectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer

Efficacy of prophylactic splenectomy for proximal advanced gastric cancer invading greater curvature

Prognosis of Patients With Gastric Cancer Who Underwent Proximal Gastrectomy

Positive impact of adding No.14v lymph node to D2 dissection on survival for distal gastric cancer patients after surgery with curative intent

The Royal Marsden. Surgery for Gastric and GE Junction Cancer: primary palliative when and where? William Allum Consultant Surgeon

Long-term postoperative survival of a gastric cancer patient with numerous para-aortic lymph node metastases

Mediastinal Staging. Samer Kanaan, M.D.

Case Scenario 1. The patient has now completed his neoadjuvant chemoradiation and has been cleared for surgery.

Original Article Effect of splenectomy on the survival of patients underwent radical surgery for gastric cardia cancer

Correspondence to: Jiankun Hu, MD, PhD. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery; Institute of Gastric Cancer, State Key Laboratory of.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Outcome Indicators of Stage II Gastric Cancer According to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancer

Surgical Management of Pancreatic Cancer

290 Clin Oncol Cancer Res (2009) 6: DOI /s

Subtotal versus total gastrectomy for T3 adenocarcinoma of the antrum

Xiang Hu*, Liang Cao*, Yi Yu. Introduction

سرطان المعدة. Gastric Cancer حمود حامد

Gastric Cancer Staging AJCC eighth edition. Duncan McLeod Westmead Hospital, NSW

Topics: Staging and treatment for pancreatic cancer. Staging systems for pancreatic cancer: Differences between the Japanese and UICC systems

Total gastrectomy with simultaneous pancreaticosplenectomy or splenectomy in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy- Valuable. Jayer Chung, MD University of Colorado Health Sciences Center December 11, 2006

I patients with nonendocrine pancreas carcinoma

Greater Manchester and Cheshire HPB Unit Guidelines for the Assessment & Management of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disease Chapter 14

Guidelines for Extended Lymphadenectomy in Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Comparative Study

Prognostic Factors for Survival of Stage IB Upper Lobe Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study in Shanghai, China

Tumours of the Oesophagus & Gastro-Oesophageal Junction Histopathology Reporting Proforma

The Royal Marsden. Surgery for Gastric and GE Junction Cancer: primary palliative when and where? William Allum

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Clinical Significance of Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer

Radical nerve dissection for the carcinoma of head of pancreas: report of 30 cases

A Proposed Strategy for Treatment of Superficial Carcinoma. in the Thoracic Esophagus Based on an Analysis. of Lymph Node Metastasis

A218 : Esophagus cancer tissues. (formalin fixed)

Is Hepatic Resection Needed in the Patients with Peritoneal Side T2 Gallbladder Cancer?

Evaluation of the ratio of lymph node metastasis as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer

Risk Factors for Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis of Gastric Cancer from a Randomized Controlled Trial of JCOG9501

COLLECTING CANCER DATA: STOMACH AND ESOPHAGUS

Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a novel prognostic indicator for advanced ESCC after surgical resection

Role of Surgery in Management of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer. Dr. Ahmed Bamousa Consultant thoracic surgery Prince Sultan Military Medical City

intent treatment be in the elderly?

MUSCLE-INVASIVE AND METASTATIC BLADDER CANCER

Surgical resection improves survival in pancreatic cancer patients without vascular invasion- a population based study

Lymph node metastasis and lymphadenectomy of resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

Gastric Cancer in a Young Postpartum Female. Kings County Hospital Center SUNY Downstate Case Conference May 24, 2012

Objectives. Intraoperative Consultation of the Whipple Resection Specimen. Pancreas Anatomy. Pancreatic ductal carcinoma 11/10/2014

Laparoscopic splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer

Abstracting Upper GI Cancer Incidence and Treatment Data Quiz 1 Multiple Primary and Histologies Case 1 Final Pathology:

Comparative study of clinical efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy versus open radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer

Management of Esophageal Cancer: Evidence Based Review of Current Guidelines. Madhuri Rao, MD PGY-5 SUNY Downstate Medical Center

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY

Comparison of lymph node number and prognosis in gastric cancer patients with perigastric lymph nodes retrieved by surgeons and pathologists

RESEARCH ARTICLE. Qian Liu, Jian-Jun Bi, Yan-Tao Tian, Qiang Feng, Zhao-Xu Zheng, Zheng Wang* Abstract. Introduction. Materials and Methods

A study on clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of patients with upper gastric cancer and middle and lower gastric cancer.

B Breast cancer, managing risk of lobular, in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, 51

Perigastric lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: comparison of different staging systems

Prognostic Significance of Extranodal Cancer Invasion of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Lung Cancer

Characteristics of intramural metastasis in gastric cancer. Tatsuya Hashimoto Kuniyoshi Arai Yuichi Yamashita Yoshiaki Iwasaki Tsunekazu

ESD for EGC with undifferentiated histology

A propensity score-matched case-control comparative study of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric carcinoma

Controversies in management of squamous esophageal cancer

Laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical distal subtotal gastrectomy

Intended for use by Clinicians and Health Care Providers involved in the Management or Referral of adult patients with pancreatic

Surgical Treatment of Gastric Cancer

Case Scenario year-old white male presented to personal physician with dyspepsia with reflux.

Canadian Scientific Journal. Intraoperative color detection of lymph nodes metastases in thyroid cancer

is time consuming and expensive. An intra-operative assessment is not going to be helpful if there is no more tissue that can be taken to improve the

Navigators Lead the Way

Therapeutic effect of laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in 106 patients with advanced gastric cancer

Clinicopathological characteristics and optimal management for esophagogastric junctional cancer; a single center retrospective cohort study

Extended multi-organ resection for ct4 gastric carcinoma: A retrospective analysis

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Helical Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Portal Vein Invasion by Pancreatic Head Carcinoma

Esophageal cancer: Biology, natural history, staging and therapeutic options

Gastric Cancer: Surgery and Regional Therapy. Epidemiology. Risk factors

Limited en bloc Resection of the Gastroesophageal Junction with Isoperistaltic Jejunal Interposition

Mucosal Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Intramural Gastric Metastasis Invading Liver and Pancreas: A Case Report

TUMORS OF THE STOMACH AND SMALL BOWEL

GASTRIC CANCER RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL ON D2 LINPHADENECTOMY VS STANDARD D1 LINPHADENECTOMY

VATS after induction therapy: Effective and Beneficial Tips on Strategy

Anatomy of laparoscopy-assisted distal D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Retrospectively analysis of the pathology and prognosis of 131 cases of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (Siewert type II/III)

Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer

Michael A. Choti, MD, FACS Department of Surgery Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Proposed All Wales Vulval Cancer Guidelines. Dr Amanda Tristram

Staging for Residents, Nurses, and Multidisciplinary Health Care Team

Prognostic Impact of Prophylactic Splenectomy for Upper-third Gastric Cancer: A Cohort Study

Esophageal Cancer Staging Essentials: The New TNM Staging System (7th edition) and Clinicoradiologic Implications

Ovarian cancer: clinical practice the Arabic perspective

Classification of nodal stations in gastric cancer

Transcription:

Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology Apr. 2007, Vol. 4, No. 2 P 109~114 Xijiang Zhao et al [SpringerLink] DOI 10.1007/s11805-007-0109-5 109 Study of the Value of Combined Multiorgan Resection in Surgical Treatment of Carcinoma of the Gastric Cardia Xijiang Zhao 1 Jingtao Huang 2 Peng Tang 1 Peng Ren 1 1 Department of Esophageal Cancer, Cancer Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China 2 Department of the Chest, Affiliated Xinhua Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116021, China Correspondence to: Xijiang Zhao. Email: wangfengming188@163.com OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of resection of combined visceral organs in surgical treatment of gastric cardiac carcinoma. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 217 random patients with carcinoma of the gastric cardia who underwent a gastric cardiac resection. The patients had been treated as follows: 186 with partial gastrectomy, 31 with total gastrectomy, 97 with a combined-visceral resection, of which 82 underwent a splenectomy plus partial pancreatectomy, 10 with splenectomy alone and 5 with partial hepatectomy and diaphragmatectomy. RESULTS: The total patients were divided into 3 groups: 128 with a gastrectomy alone, 10 with gastrectomy and splenectomy, and 82 with gastrectomy and splenectomy plus pancreatectomy. The operating times for these 3 groups were respectively 3.0 h, 3.1 h and 3.8 h. The hospitalization times were respectively 23.8 d, 31.2 d and 25.9 d. No differences in post-operative complications were found between these 3 groups. There were 92 patients who underwent a gastrectomy combined with a splenectomy and (or) the pancreatectomy, in which 92 No.10 lymph nodes were eliminated, with an average of one in each patient. Among the 125 patients not receiving a splenectomy but with elimination of lymph nodes, 82 underwent a gastrectomy combined with partial pancreatectomy, of which 107 lymph nodes were eliminated for the No. 11 group, with an average of 1.3 in each patient. There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. The overall survival rates were similar in the 3 groups showing no statistical differences, but was higher in the Stage III patients with a combined resection of multiorgans. For patients in the Stage IV without resection of multi-organs, the survival rate was higher, but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: It is difficult to determine precisely the involvement of para-tumorous organs with the eye during an operation. Combining a splenectomy with a pancreatectomy does not increase the post-operative complications following surgical treatment for carcinoma of the gastric cardia. The combination of a splenectomy and partial pancreatectomy results in a higher survival rate and has an important significance for eliminating the lymph nodes of group 10 and 11, especially for patients in Stage III. In the application of a resection combining multi-organs, the doctor should make every effort to decrease the trauma and the complications based on the condition that the cancerous tissue is totally resected. KEYWORDS: Carcinoma of gastric cardia, surgical treatment, combined devisceration Received January 1, 2007; accepted March 11, 2007. CJCO http://www.cjco.cn E-mail:cocr@eyou.com Tel(Fax):86-22-2352 2919 Introduction The incidence of carcinoma of the gastric cardia is rapidly increasing. Despite the increasing incidence, the overall prognosis is poor, with 5-year survival rates of approximately 15% [1]. It

110 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology Apr. 2007, Vol. 4, No. 2 P 109~114 Xijiang Zhao et al. remains as one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Because of its poor prognosis, multiple types of surgical treatments have been attempted to improve survival. Despite improved diagnostic techniques, most patients present in an advanced tumor stage. A radical resection, often involving extended multiorgans, remains as the best chance for a cure, but the optimal extent of resection in recent years has become more controversial. In this retrospective study, we have investigated the value of a combined extended multiorgan resection for treatment of gastric cardia carcinoma. Materials and methods Gastric cardia carcinoma was defined as a lesion located within 2 cm distal to the anatomic esophagogastric junction. Between January 1983 and December 1998, 217 patients with gastric cardia carcinoma underwent gastrectomy and were registered into the study at the Department of Esophageal Cancer of the Tianjin Cancer Hospital. Of them, 97 patients underwent gastrectomy with a combined resection of other organs macroscopically invaded noted during surgery. These included 82 patients with a tail pancreatectomy plus splenectomy, 10 with a splenectomy alone, 5 with a partial hepatectomy, 5 with a partial diaphragmectomy. The patients who only underwent an exploration, and who were lost during follow-up 5 years postoperation, were excluded from this study. Patient characteristics are listed in Table 1. The subjects ranged in ages from 34 to 83 years (median 59 years) and included 193 men and 24 women. All patients were classified according to the staging system of the UICC (1997) as follows: Ia, 1(0.5%); Ib, 10(4.6%); Ⅱ,20(9.2%); IIIa, 85(39.2%); IIIB, 71 (32.7%); TV, 30(13.8%). The pathologic types of carcinoma were classified according the WHO classification as well as the PTNM classification of the UICC. These include papillary adenocarcinoma, 42(19.4%); ductal adenocarionoma, 57(26.3%);poorly differentiated adenocareinoma, 72 (33.2%); muciform adenocurcinoma, 26(12.0%); muco cellular carcinoma, 19(8.8%) and adenosqamous cell carcinoma 1(0.5%). Confirmation of invasion of adjacent organs was established macroscopically in 51 patients(23.5%). The tissues and numbers invaded were the pancreas, 29(13.4%); diaphragm, 17 (6.3%); lesser omenta, 3; and one each in the mesentery, left adrenal gland; contra lateral pleura and one spleen metastasis. The extent of resection depended on the tumor size and the ability to save the resection margins. Proximal gastrectomy was performed in 186 patients and total gastrectomy in 31 patients. The presence or absence of macroscopically apparent invasion of adjacent organs and the ability to facilitate the dissection of lymph nodes determined whether a combinedextended multiorgan resection would be performed. Table 1. Characteristics of patients. Characteristics Patients Sex Male 193 Female 24 Age (mean. years) 59(34-83) Histology Papillary 42(19.4%) Ductal 57(26.3%) Poorly differentiated 72(33.2%) Puciform 26(12.0%) Muco-cellular 19(8.8%) Adeno-squamous 1(0.5%) Stage of carcinoma Ia 1 Ib 10 II 20 IIIa 85 IIIb 71 IV 30 Primary tumor Invading adjacent organs 51 Invading pancreas 29 Invading diaphragm 17 Invading lesser omenta 3 Invading left adrenal gland 1 Invading mesemterium 1 Invading contralateral pleura 1 Metastaic spleen 1 Type of operation Gastrectomy only 128 Gastrectomy with splenectomy 10 Gastrectomy with Pancreastico splenectomy 82 Proximal gastrectomy 186 Total gastrectomy 31 Operative time (hr. mean) Gastrectomy only 3.7 With splenectomy 3.1 With pancreastico-splenectomy 3.8 (Length of hospital stay) Hospitalizing time (d. mean) Gastrectomy only 23.8 With splenectomy 31.2 With pancreastico-splenectomy 25.9 Post-operative complication Subphrenic abscese 1 Others 0 Results All the patients were divided into three groups consisting of these numbers: gastrectomy alone, 128; gastrectomy with splenectomy, 10; and gastrectomy with pancreatico-splenectomy, 82. Among the latter group, 9 patients were considered to have a macroscopically invaded pancreas and spleen during the

Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology Apr. 2007, Vol. 4, No. 2 P 109~114 Xijiang Zhao et al 111 operation, but of which only 2 patients were microscopically diagnosed to have infiltration of the pancreatic serosal capsule. Histological examination of the specimen revealed only 1 patient to have metastasis in the spleen in all of the 92 patients with splenectomy. The mean operating times for these 3 groups were respectively 3.7 h, 3.1 h and 3.8 h. The mean post-operative hospitalization times were respectively 23.8 d, 31.9 d and 25.9 d. The post-operative complications were not statistically different among the 3 groups. One subphrenic abscess occurred post-operatively in a patient with a panereatico-splenectomy without a pancreatic fistula, acute pancreatitis and post-operative diabetes. Among the 92 patients who underwent a gastrectomy and splenectomy, including a combined pancreatico-splenectomy, 92 lymph nodes were dissected in station 10 (median 1/patient). Station 10 lymph nodes could not be dissected in 125 patients who underwent a gastrectomy without splenectomy. Eightytwo patients underwent a resection of the pancreatic body and tail in which 107 lymph nodes from station 11 were dissected (median 1.3/patient). There was a statistically significant difference between the lymph node yield with these two types of operation(table 2). The survival rates of patients who underwent gastrectomy alone, gastrectomy with splenectomy and gastrectomy with panereatico-splenectomy were similar without a significant difference (Table 3). The survival rate was higher in patients who underwent gastrectomy with a multiorgan resection in Stage III and also higher in the patients who underwent a gastrectomy without a multiorgan resection in Stage IV. Analysis of Stage III and Stage IV carcinoma for patients who underwent gastrectomy alone in comparison with patients who underwent a gastrectomy with splenectomy or with pancreatico-splenectomy, showed no statistically significant differences between these two staged groups (Table 4 and 5). Discussion The reasons for a combined multiorgan resection for gastric cardia carcinoma commonly involved two fac tors: the first was that the carcinoma directly invaded the adjacent organs. Therefore a total or partial resection of the invaded organs was necessary to obtain a curative resection [2]. The second reason was to facilitate more extensive regional lymph node dissection involving mainly the lymph node stations 10 and 11 and the pancreas and spleen. Macroscopic invasion of adjacent organs was sometimes difficult to identify during the operation for carcinoma of gastric cardia. The rate of adjacent organ invasion and the accuracy of macroscopic identification should be completely known as they are helpful in providing a rational basis to choose the type of operation. Qin and Lin [3] reported that among 439 cases, in only 25 cases was it possible to detect direct invasion into the pancreas (5.7%), and in 10 cases a direct invasion into the spleen (2.3%). After pathological examination of the pancreatic body and tail, they found 22 cases with pancreatic and splenic combined resection, only 4 cases (18.2%) with direct capsule invasion and 2 (9.1%) with invasion into the superficial parenchyma without metastasis to the lymph nodes within the pancreas and spleen. Okajima et al [4] reported that there was only fibrous adhesion to the pancreas without cancerous invasion in 34.3% of the patients, cancerous invasion to the pancreatic capsule in 25%, and minimal cancerous invasion into the superficial pancreatic parenchyma in 21.9%. There were massive cancerous invasions to the deep pancreatic parenchyma in 18.8%. Monig et al. [5] reported that 112 patients were treated surgically for primary gastric adenocarcinoma, in which infiltration of the spleen was noted only in two advanced cases of a diffuse type carcinoma (Stage Ⅳ) localized at the greater curvature. The autopsy study by The Chinese Pathological Group of Gastric Carcinoma [6] showed that pancreatic invasion occurred in 18.6% and splenic invasion in 7.2% among the patients who died of advanced gastric carcinoma. Piso et al. [7] noted that intraoperatively, true pancreatic invasion was difficult to differentiate from an inflammatory lesion, and suspected tumor infiltration of the pancreas was confirmed by histology only in 39% of the examined resected specimens. In our study, pancreatic invasion was macroscopically suspected in 29 patients (13.4%) during operations. Among these, 14 patients were considered to receive a paliative resection because of a lack of a pancreatectomy, and 9 patients underwent a resection of the pancreatic body and tail (11.0%). For the 82 patients who underwent a resection of the pancreatic body and tail, infiltration of the pancreatic capsule was conformed by pathology only in 2 cases (22.2%), and infiltration of pancreatic parenchyma was not conformed at all. In all 92 patients who underwent gastrectomy with splenectomy (including 82 patients who underwent the pancreatico-splenectomy), splenic metastasis was confirmed by a pathologic examination in only 1 patient (1.0%).

112 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology Apr. 2007, Vol. 4, No. 2 P 109~114 Xijiang Zhao et al. Table 2. Lymph node yield per station. Type of operation Patients LN yield Median LN yield Gastrectomy with Splenectomy(including 92 92 1 pancreastio-splenectomy) Gastrectomy only 125 0 0 Gastrectomy with resection of pancreatic body and tail 82 107 1.3 Table 3. Survival rate of combined multiorgan resection. Operative type Survival rate (%) 0 year 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 10 years Gastrectomy only 100 61.5 44.3 32.8 24.6 16.0 16.0 with splenectomy With 100 50.0 40.0 40.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 pancreastico Splenectomy 100 68.8 46.8 28.6 27.3 26.0 20.8 Table 4. Survival rate for Stage III patients. Operative Survival rate(%) types 0 year 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 10 years Gastrectomy only with pancreatic 100 59.1 39.8 25.8 20.4 17.2 13.6 Splenectomy 100 75.5 50.9 28.3 28.3 28.3 22.6 Table 5. Surival rate for Stage IV patients. Operative types Survival rate (%) 0 year 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 10 years Gastrectomy only with pancreastieo 100 54.5 36.4 36.4 27.3 18.2 9.1 Splenectomy 100 41.2 23.5 17.6 11.8 5.9 5.9 Although the lymph nodes at the splenic hilus (no.10) and those along the splenic artery (no.11) were generally classified as level 2 lymph nodes (N2), the metastatic rate was high. Lin [7] reported that the lymph node metastatic rate at the splenic hilus (no.10) and those along the splenic artery (no.11) were 20% and 30% respectively for gastric cardia carcinoma. The incidences of no.10 or no.11 lymph node metastasis were as high as 24% and 30% for Tang [8],15.5% and 12.1% for Okajima and Isozaki [4] and 24% for Sakaguchi et al. [10] This reflected essentially the true incidences of no.10 and no.11 lymph node metastases. The autopsy examinations by the Chinese Pathological Group of Gastric Carcinoma showed that the metastatic rate of lymph nodes at the splenic hilus (no.10) was only 3.4% in carcinoma of the gastric cardia and fundus. Clinically, there were some special characteristics for lymph node metastasis in the area of the peripancreas and splenic hilus in gastric cardia carcinoma. Tang [8] suggested that carcinoma of the stomach greater than 3 cm and Borrman I, III and IV and poorly differentiated were prone to metastases to no.10 and no.11 lymph nodes. Sakaguchi et al. [9] reported that the characteristics of gastric carcinoma with metastasis to the lymph nodes at the splenic hilus, and those along the splenic artery, included a larger tumor (>4 cm), deeper penetration (T3, 4 tumors and, T2 tumor with gross serosal change), a number of lymph node metastasis, and infiltrative types. In our surgical series, splenectomy or partial pancreatectomy was often performed simultaneously with gastrectomy to facilitate dissection of the lymph nodes around the splenic hilus and splenic artery. Splenectomy was absolutely necessary for dissection of the lymph nodes at the spleen (no.10), and partial pancreatectomy was also necessary for dissection of the lymph nodes along the splenic artery(no.11).the metastatic lymph node yield from the no.10 and no.11 lymph nodes was 0 in patients who underwent gastrectomy without splenectomy and partial pancreatectomy. Okajima and Isozaki [4] suggested the indications for a splenectomy in patients with gastric cancer if a curative operation is expected, namely, 1) direct invasion to the pancreas or spleen; 2) metastasis to lymph nodes along the splenic artery or at the splenic hilus; 3) immunologic possibilities: preserving the spleen for Stage I II or III disease, splenectomy for Stage Ⅳ disease. Gastrectomy with pancreatio-splenectomy also has shown a better curability. The study of Huang at al. [11] showed that the 5 and 10 year survival rates

Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology Apr. 2007, Vol. 4, No. 2 P 109~114 Xijiang Zhao et al 113 were respectively increased 14.2% and 15.9% for Stage III patients who underwent gastrectomy with pancreatico-splenectomy; but the results were similar for the Stage I, II and Ⅳ patients who underwent the same type operation, without a statistically significant difference. They suggested that an extensive radical resection should be performed for Stage III carcinoma patients with serosal invasion or lymph node metastasis in level two. Lin [7] also reported that lymph node metastases were limited in peri-gastric lymph nodes for Stage I without adjacent organ invasion and distant metastasis, the dissection of peri-gastric lymph nodes was enough for those patients. For patients in Stage Ⅳ with distant metastasis, an extensive resection was not beneficial for survival and a simple surgical procedure was suitable. For those an extensive radical resection was necessary to be performed for Stage II and III carcinoma. The study of Wang et al. [11] showed that the survival rate of patients who underwent a gastrectomy with pancreatico-splenectomy was much better for Stage III patients with lymph nodes metastasis. In our-series, there were no differences in the survival rates in the three groups (gastrectomy alone, gastrectomy combined with splenectomy and gastrectomy with pancreatico-splenectomy). However the patients receiving a gastrectomy alone and gastrectmoy combined with panereaticosplenectomy based on the staging, showed that the survival rate was higher in the Stage III with gastrectomy and pancreatico-splenectomy and higher in the Stage Ⅳ with gastrectomy alone, but the differences were not statistically significant. Generally, there were two major indications for splenectomy or pancreatico-splenectomy during the surgery for carcinoma of gastric cardia [4] : (1) If there was a direct invasion of the spleen or pancreas. (2) If there were metastases to the lymph nodes at the splenic hilus or along the splenic artery. Based on the developmental anatomy, Lin [7] reported that by removal of the pancreatic body and tail, spleen and stomach en bloc with a cutting out of the pancreas at the junction of the head and body, he was able to completely provide dissection of the lymph nodes at the splenic hilus and along the splenic artery. This technique was helpful in dissecting the lymph nodes of the peri-celiac artery and the major bronchus. Pancreatic and splenic resection produces some complications, such as pancreatic juice leakage, acute pancreatitis, subphrenic abscess, and postoperative diabetes. Wang et al. [11] reported that the postoperative complication rates were respectively 21.5% and 15.8% in patients who underwent gastrectomy combined with pancreatico-splenectomy and gastrectomy alone. The mortality rate was respectively 12.5% and 5.5% in those two groups. Huang et al. [10] reported that the postoperative complication rates and mortality rates were respectively 14.1%, 11.1%, 4.6% and 3.9%. In our study, only 1 case of subphrenic abscess occurred in patients who underwent gastrectomy combined with pancreatico-splenectomy. There was no pancreatic juice leakage, acute pancreatitis or postoperative diabetes. Although splenectomy had been advocated for clearance of the splenic hilar lymph nodes, whether or not to preserve the spleen has been vigorously debated. The spleen plays an important role in antitumor activity, eliminating the tumor after inoculation of a small number of tumor cells [12]. Maruyma et al. [13] reported that a total of 299 patients were treated by total gastrectomy associated with a pancreaticpreserving operation from 1976 to 1991; and 319 patients underwent a combined resection of the distal pancreas and spleen during the same period. The mortality rate of the pancreas-preserving (PP) group was lower than that of the pancreas-resection (PR) group: 0.3% versus 0.9%. The hospital death rate was 1.6% in the PP group and 3.1% in the PR group. Surgical complications related to the pancreas were also fewer in the PP group than in the PR group: 19.6% and 39.4%, respectively. Furukawa et al. [14] reported that between 1981 and 1989, 110 patients were registered in a randomized controlled trial, which included total gastrectomy plus dissection of lymph nodes along the splenic artery, either with (55 patients: Group A) or without (55 patients: Group B) pancreas tail resection. The number of dissected lymph nodes was 4.6 in Group A and 4.1 in Group B. Blood loss in Group B was 904 ml and in Group A it was 994 ml. A postoperation pancreatic fistula occurred more frequently in Group A (14.5%) than in Group B (9.1%), but the difference was not statistically significant. Reduced glucose tolerance was 39% in Group A, but normal in Group B. The 5-year survival rate was 80.0% in Group A and 76.7% in Group B. They considered total gastrectomy with pancreas-preserving dissection of lymph nodes the splenic artery and splenectomy to be a rational method for treatment of patients with advanced cancer in the upper or middle part of the stomach. Qin and Lin [3] performed a radical resection of gastric carcinoma with pancreatic and splenic preservation (PSP) and functional clean LNS of the splenic hilus and along the splenic artery in 63 cases with gastric cancer. These cases were compared with those receiving a pancreatic and splenic combined resection (PSR). Postoperative complications, diabetes and mortality in the PSP(0%, 0%, 0%) were less than in the PSR group (40%, 10%, and 3.3%). The 5-YSR

114 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology Apr. 2007, Vol. 4, No. 2 P 109~114 Xijiang Zhao et al. and 10-YSR in the PSP cases (57.5%, 52.0%) were higher than that in the PSR group(37.0%, 30.0%). This operative procedure was particularly recommended for those patients with Stage II and Stage IIIa tumors, as those treated by PSP were markedly improved. Sakaguchi et al. [9] proposed that splenectomy should be conducted in T2 cases with gross serosal change and in T3 cases with 4 tumors. conclusion We conclude that a gastrectomy combined with extended multiorgan resection in patients with gastric cardia carcinoma is the operation of choice as it serves to ensure the oncological curability and at the same time reduce the trauma and the complications to a minimum. REFERRENCES 1 Gaca JG, Petersen RP, Peterson BL, et al. Pathologic nodal status predicts disease-free survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006; 13:340-346. 2 Hansson LE, Ekstrom AM, Bergstrom D Sc R, et al. Carcinoma of the gastric cardia: surgical practices and short-term operative results in a defined Swedish population. World J Surg. 2000; 24:473-478. 3 Oin H, Lin C.Radical resection of gastric carcinoma with pancreas and spleen preservation and functional cleaning of lymph node. Chin Med J(Eng). 2002; 115:736-739. 4 Okajima K, Isozaki H. Splenectomy for treatment of gastric cancer: Japanese Experience. World J Surg. 1995; 19:537-540. 5 Monig SP, Collet PH, Baldus SE, et al. Splenectomy in proximal gastric cancer: frequency of lymph node metastasis to the splenic hilus. J Surg Oncol. 2001; 76:89-92. 6 Piso P, Bellin T, Aselmann H, et al. Results of combined gastrectomy and pancreatic resection in patients with advanced primary gastric carcinoma. Dig Surg, 2002; 19:281-285. 7 Lin YZ. Extensive radical resection for gastric carcinoma. Prac Surg J. 1985; 5:63-64. 8 Tang JS. Metastasis of pancreatieo-splenic area in carcinoma of gastric cardia.tumor,1994;14(5):284-286. 9 Sakaguchi T, Sawada H, Yamada Y, et al. Indication of splenectomy for gastric carcinoma involving the proximal part of the stomach. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001; 48:603-605. 10 Huang CM, Zhang Xf, Lu HS,et al. Comparison of effects for radical resection and extensive radical resection in carcinoma of gastric fundus and cardia. Chin Surg J. 2000; 38:55-57. 11 Wang DY, Zhang XZ, Wu DT,et al. Comparison of effects for two types of radical resection in carcinoma of gastric cardia. Chin Clin Oncol. 1987; 14:140-143. 12 Yongkang Y, Shuang C. Problems of splenectomy during the operation in gastric carcinoma. Clin Gen Surg. 1990; 5:291-294. 13 Maruyama K, Sasako M, Kinoshita T, et al. Pancreaspreserving total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer. World J Surg. 1995; 19:532-536. 14 Furukawa H, Hiratsuka M, Ishikawa O, et al. Total gastrectomy with dissection of lymph nodes along the splenic artery: a pancreas-preserving method. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000; 7:669-673.