Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind

Similar documents
Hawaii School for the Deaf & the Blind

Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind

the Deaf and the Blind

Hawaii School for the Deaf & the Blind

May 15, Dear Parents and Community Members:

Providing Highly-Valued Service Through Leadership, Innovation, and Collaboration

Gallaudet University 2009 Annual Survey of Recent

A Resilience Program Model

School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

DISTRICT LETTERHEAD. REVISED TEMPLATE (Letter Sent on District s Letterhead) School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

Assistant Superintendent of Business &

2004 MAKING ACHIEVEMENT POSSIBLE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT

College of Education and Human Services Exceptional Student & Deaf Education Course Descriptions

22932 Woodward Ave., Ferndale, MI School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

#5411 Educational Leadership: Administration and Supervision. #5135: Art: Content & Analysis Knowledge. #5101 Business Education: Content Knowledge

Job Description: Special Education Teacher of Deaf and Hard of Hearing

Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services Preliminary Data for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in Colorado s Public Schools

School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

MACOMB MONTESSORI ACADEMY School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter - REVISED

Warren Consolidated Schools

School / District Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

Council on Education of the Deaf Office of Program Accreditation

SPECIAL EDUCATION (SED) DeGarmo Hall, (309) Website:Education.IllinoisState.edu Chairperson: Stacey R. Jones Bock.

Deaf Studies Program

1. Placement of students in the appropriate program is not based on

Providing Highly-Valued Service Through Leadership, Innovation, and Collaboration. July 30, Dear Parents and Community Members:

Center for Outreach Services. Ohio School for the Deaf

Ruffalo Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Results: All Students Gallaudet University Spring 2018 Report

Short-Term Strategic Plan : Creating Conditions to be Ready for Transformation

Council on Education of the Deaf. Office of Program Accreditation. CED Program Review Evaluation Rubric

A strong commitment to American Sign Language and the culture of Deaf people guides the department.

MAINSTREAM TEACHER OF THE DEAF

Announcing a Position Opening: Head of School Northwest School for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children

Principal, Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program Class Code: 1450 Work Days: 220

WHO WE ARE I L L I N O I S S C H O O L F O R T H E D E A F. State of Illinois Bruce Rauner, Governor

College of Agriculture, School of Human Environmental Sciences

H 7978 SUBSTITUTE A ======== LC005519/SUB A ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Add Graduate Certificate in Deafness Rehabilitation (UTK Notification)

ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2555 S. State Street Ann Arbor, MI www. a2schools.org Pioneer High School Annual Education Report (AER)!

OFFICE OF EDUCATOR LICENSURE SUBJECT MATTER KNOWLEDGE. The Competency Review Made Simple

I. Introduction. II. Program Description

July 2018 Submission Formatting Information

Special Education: Contemporary Perspectives for School Professionals Fourth Edition. Marilyn Friend. Kerri Martin, Contributor

ACTION PLAN: REGULAR PROGRAMS AND ADDITIONAL STRATEGIES

December 1 Child Count Formatting Information

CURRICULUM VITAE. Dr. Sandra G. Edwards University of Montevallo Montevallo, AL 35115

Category Communication Deaf/Hard of Hearing

Hearing Impaired K 12

Developing an Effective IEP for Children with Deaf-Blindness: A Parent Mini-Guide

II. GENERAL STATEMENT OF POLICY

ASL-ENGLISH INTERPRETER PREPARATION

STATE BOARD OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES CURRICULUM PROGRAM APPLICATION (New to the System) Pitt Community College Breast Sonography (Certificate) (C45xxx)

A Division of Salisbury Behavioral Health. To apply for any of the positions posted, please send your letter of intent and resume to:

COMPETENCY REVIEW GUIDE OFFICE OF EDUCATOR LICENSURE. How to Satisfy and Document Subject Matter Knowledge Competency Review Requirements

Project Goal(s) and Objectives What is a goal? What is an objective? Measurable Objectives

Professional Doctorate in Counselling Psychology

Jackson Public Schools

August 10, School Name Reason(s) for not making AYP Key actions underway to address the issues McKinley Adult and Alternative Education Center

Behavioral Healthcare Employment and Education Housing

Minnesota s Dental Therapist Workforce, 2016 HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE 2016 DENTAL THERAPIST SURVEY

DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY (Ultrasound)

Students Who are Deaf or Hard-of- Hearing in Minnesota. June 2011

understands. WPSD WPSD understands that each deaf and hard-of-hearing child is different and unique. ring child is different and unique.

IEP MEETING CHECKLIST FOR PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DEAF-BLINDNESS

TExES Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (181) Test at a Glance

Minnesota s Dental Therapist Workforce, 2016 HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE 2016 DENTAL THERAPIST SURVEY

Career-Related Services

2011 Gallaudet Senior Language Assessment Project Report: ASL Presentation

British Sign Language (BSL) College Action Plan

3/16/2016. Learning Objectives. Benefits of Bilingual/Bimodal Preschool Programming. Bilingual/Bimodal Inclusive Early Childhood Program

State Summary Table 1 Child Care Workers/ Educators. Teachers 3 Assistant Teachers 4 Directors FCCH Providers

South Dakota School for the Deaf

July 2019 Submission Formatting Information

MASSACHUSETTS COMMISSION ON DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING Annual Family Support Plan Report FY 07

Academic Program / Discipline Area (for General Education) or Co-Curricular Program Area:

CHAPTER 40 PROFESSIONAL LICENSING AND FACILITY REGULATION

To assist the District in its goal to prevent chemical use and abuse by providing procedures for education and intervention.

SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER Job Description

Syllabus. WSU Department Name Foreign Languages & Literatures. WSU Course Number & Listing FL ASL2010: Second Year I (3 Credit Hrs.

RESPONSE TO THE LANGUAGE EQUALITY AND ACQUISITION FOR DEAF KIDS (LEAD K) TASK FORCE REPORT

Low Incidence Guidelines

Engage for Change local a conversation in Spartanburg, SC. September 6, 2018

TESFA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL CHEMICAL USE AND ABUSE (417)

The Basic Skills Test Exemption for Prelingually Deaf Candidates

2012 Assessment of St. Lucie County s Social, Health, and Public Safety Services

Chapter 3 - Deaf-Blindness

COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND IMPLEMENATION PLAN JUNE 2016

Illinois State University: Graduate Specialization Certificate: Listening and Spoken Language Professional Informational Meeting

MAKING TRANSITION HAPPEN!

Digital The College at Brockport: State University of New York. Bridget Ashmore

Annual Report on Curriculum, Instruction, and Student Achievement. Canby Public Schools, ISD 891. Systems Accountability. Approved October 14, 2014

Undergraduate Courses: Option 1 (rev: February 2011)

SECTION B-3 PROVINCIAL AND DEMONSTRATION SCHOOLS IN ONTARIO

PARTICIPATION APPLICATION and AGREEMENT for CULINARY SCHOOL PROGRAM

Language Access Services Policy and Health Care Interpreters. David Cardona, MD, MPH Language Access Services Coordinator

Arkansas Association of the Deaf High School Scholarship Program

Mosman Park School for Deaf Children

A Study of Education for Students Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing (Senate Resolution 164)

Transcription:

Code: 470 Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind Status and Improvement Report Year 006-07 Focus On Standards Grades K-1 Focus on Standards Description Contents p. 1 p. 1 This Status and Improvement Report has been prepared as part of the Department's education accountability system to provide regular, understandable accounts of our schools' performance and progress, as required by 0A-1004, Hawai'i Revised Statutes. This report describes the school and its setting; provides information about the school's administrators, teachers, students and facilities; summarizes progress made based on the school's improvement plan, and reports student achievement results along with other vital signs. Setting Student Profile Community Profile Improvement Summary of Progress Resources Certified Staff Facilities Vital Signs Quality Survey Student Conduct Retention or Completion Hawaii Assessment Other Information Address: p. p. p. 4 pp. 5-7 Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind 440 Leahi Avenue Honolulu, Hawaii 96815 p. 8 Description The Hawai'i Center for the Deaf and the Blind (HCDB) is at the foot of Diamond Head in Kapahulu, and was established in 1914. The Center is composed of a school, residential, and diagnostic/resource component. The school component serves the 's deaf and deaf-blind students from pre-school through high school. The school provides an American Sign Language (ASL) immersion, instructional program with a bilingual approach that utilizes specialized teaching methodologies for deaf students. All faculty and staff are required to use ASL with the deaf students. HCDB students are able to participate with neighboring high schools for sports. Transition services are provided to students as they prepare for post-secondary education and/or employment. The residential (dormitory) program enables neighbor island students to access the school program on Oahu. Residential students are flown home every weekend to maintain close family ties. The cost of the home-going program, including airfare, ground transportation and adult supervision, is paid for by HCDB. The diagnostic/resource component provides evaluations for students statewide who are deaf, blind, hard-of-hearing, deaf-blind or partiallysighted. These evaluations are completed by trained professionals in audiology, speech/language pathology, visual and/or hearing impairments. When needed, evaluations are conducted in ASL. Braille and large-type materials are disseminated to students who are blind or partially-sighted. Open-captioned, educational media for deaf and hard-of-hearing students is available for free-loan statewide. Technical assistance, consultation and training for teachers, schools, and families of children in the target groups is also provided upon request. This includes educational interpreters for deaf and hard-ofhearing students in mainstream settings. Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind 0/08 Page 1 of 8

Status and Improvement Report Setting Year 006-07 Student Profile year 004-05 -06 006-07 Fall enrollment Number and percent of students enrolled for the entire school year 75 9.% 77 87. 77 70 67 69 89.6% Student Ethnicity, Year 006-07 Native American 1 1.% Black 1 1.% Chinese.4% Filipino 4 8.% Hawaiian 1 1.% Number and percent of students receiving free or reduced-cost lunch 55 1 1 7.% 7.% 16.9% Part-Hawaiian 16 Japanese.4% 18.8% Korean 0 0. Number and percent of students in Special Education programs 75 76 77 100. 98.7% 100. Portuguese 1 Hispanic 1 1.% 1.% Number and percent of students with limited English proficiency Percent of Kindergartners who attended preschool 0 5 0. 8.6%.5% 57% 10 10 Samoan 4 4.7% White 11 1.9% Indo-Chinese 0 0. Other 1 4.7% 4 6 8 10 n = 85 Community Profile Kaimuki Complex Based on the 000 U.S. Census of Community Hawai`i Community Educational Attainment Level Total population Percentage of population aged 5-19 77,75 1.4% 1,11,57 0.6% College Graduate 9.8% 6.% Median age of population Number of families 40.6 17,698 6. 87,068 Some College 8.1% 9.9% Percentage of families with children under 18 Percentage of families with children headed by a single mother Average family size Median household income.% 4.6% $40,1 45. 18.%.4 $49,80 High Less than High Graduate 14.9% 15.4% 7.% 8.5% Percent of households with Public Assistance income 5. 7.6% 1 4 5 Percent of families with children living in poverty 15.4% 11.% of Haw ai`i Community Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind 0/08 Page of 8

Status and Improvement Report Improvement Year 006-07 Summary of Progress The Hawaii Center for the Deaf and the Blind (HCDB) developed a Strategic Plan and Academic & Financial Plan (AFP) in December. The Strategic Plan is for three years, from -008, and mirrors the goals of the DOE Strategic Plan. The AFP for Year 006- identified actions and targeted specific areas of improvement. The AFP prioritized targeted interventions included: Improving reading scores through implementing standards-based, bilingual education that incorporates reading throughout the content areas Creating a learning environment that invites student, parent and community involvement in order to support student learning, promote positive student behavior and an increased sense of community Develop and sustain a professional learning community that is technologically adept and promotes collaboration for student success. During Year 006- we worked on the goals and have accomplished the following: Increased the amount of time students spent reading by utilizing the Accelerated Reader (AR) program. Upper school students (grades 6-1) read twice a day for thirty (0) minutes, and the elementary students read, or are read to, twice a day for twenty (0) minutes. The students have read, and passed the comprehension tests, for over,000 books this school year. An increase in reading scores on the STAR Assessment from fall 006 to spring of 1% for sixty-six students that participated. Beginning implementation of the Accelerated Math (AM) program with an increase in scores on the STAR Assessment from fall 006 to spring of 17% for forty-eight students that participated. Dedicated position for an American Sign Language (ASL) Teacher. Position was filled by a half-time person that focused on mentoring and providing feedback and professional development to teachers. Student participation in seventeen Service Learning Projects, compared to six the previous school year. In addition, the students participated in several community service projects. These projects included school clean up, food and clothing drive for a homeless shelter, and care packages for deployed airmen overseas. Dedicated position for a Transition Teacher that focused on student interest and skill assessments that aided in the placement of students in off-campus jobs and alternative school placements. These placements resulted in continued employment for students after the semester ended, and motivation for learning in students in a non-traditional setting. Videophones in the boys and girls dormitories, office, library and some classrooms so that the deaf students may be able to communicate with their families and other students. Use of technology to showcase student achievements and work. Standards continue to be implemented in the framework of individualized needs determined by each student s Individualized Education Program (IEP). Each student s IEP aligns with HCPS III standards and benchmarks. Progress on those standards and benchmarks are reported to parents on at least a quarterly basis, and reviewed and revised annually. Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind 0/08 Page of 8

Status and Improvement Report Certified Staff Teaching Staff Resources Students per Teaching Staff Year 006-07 Total Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Regular Instruction, FTE 0. Special Instruction, FTE 100. Supplemental Instruction, FTE 0. Teacher headcount Teachers with 5 or more years at this school Teachers' average years of experience Teachers with advanced degrees Professional Teacher Credentials Fully licensed 68.4% 18.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 19 10 11.4 15 1 Regular Instruction Special Instruction Administrative and Student Services Staff Administration, FTE Librarians, FTE Counselors, FTE 0.0 4. Regular instruction includes both regular and supplemental teaching staff and does not include mainstreamed special education students. Therefore, these figures do not indicate class size..0 1.0.0 Provisional credential 1.1% 4 Number of principals at this school in the last five years 1 Emergency credential 10.5% Administration includes Principals, Vice-Principals, Student Activity Coordinators, Student Services Coordinators, Registrars, and Athletic Directors Adequacy of 's Space Facilities Year Ending Classrooms available 0 Number of classrooms short (-) or over (+) 0 facilities inspection results Score Grounds Building exterior Building interior Equipment/Furnishings Health/Safety Sanitation 1 Data not available Total 14 For each category: 1 = Unacceptable; = Satisfactory; = Very Good For Total: 6-8 = Unacceptable; 9-15 = Satisfactory; 16-18 = Very Good facilities are considered inadequate if below 7; marginal if between 7 and 99%; and in excess of state standard if above 10. population is placed into size categories and is used in formulas to determine standards for space. Graph does not display capacity exceeding 0. Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind 0/08 Page 4 of 8

Status and Improvement Report Quality Survey Vital Signs Year 006-07 The Quality Survey (SQS) is conducted every two years. The first 6 dimensions correspond to those in the Standards Implementation Design. The last dimensions fulfill reporting requirements of Chapter 0A-1004 Hawaii Revised Statutes. Percent of Positive Responses Quality Survey Dimensions Teachers Parents Students Standards-Based Learning 77.% 81.% 69.4% 65.6% 75. 84.% 80.1% 7.8% 66.1% 78.7% 5.5% 5.5% Quality Student Support 90.8% 70.1% 76.8% 6.9% 85.7% 78.5% 65.% 64.% 6.5% 81.8% 48.5% 44.9% Professionalism & System Capacity 5.% 6.% 75. 64.% 100. 67.4% 6.5% 50. 66.5% 75. 51.4% 49.9% Coordinated Team Work 86.7% 70.% 69.6% 50.% 9.9% 5.1% 69.% 6.4%.% 5.9% 96.4% 50.9% Responsiveness of the System 80. 7.9% 74.% 66.7% 65.1% 44.4% 59.% 59.5% There are no student items for this dimension Focused & Sustained Action 60. 68.6% 50. 50.4% 60. 70.6% 6.%.% 55.8% 75. 44.8% 44.7% Involvement 7.% 77.5% 77.1% 59.% 100. 7.7% 71.% 8.9% 60.1% 100. 5.7% 5.7% Satisfaction 60. 54.7% 70. 55.8% 75. 46.4% 6.6% 49.1% 40. 56.8% 58.% 44.7% Student Safety & Well Being 9.% 74.5% 7.% 6.8% 79.% 47.4% 85.9% 71.1% 66.7% 6.5% 85.1% 44.1% Survey Return Rate 8.5% 61.5% 9.1% 0.5% 0.8% 78.9% 9.8% 70. 8. 19.6% 100. 77.8% Teacher and Parent positive response figures are one of 4 grade spans (Gr. K to 5/6, Gr. 6/7 to 8, Gr. 9 to 1, and Multi-level) that best correspond to this school's grade span. The Student positive response figures for the and this school are those of the highest grade level surveyed at this school. Return Rate for Teachers, Parents, and Students are for one of 6 grade spans (i.e., Gr. K to 5/6, Gr. K to 7/8, Gr. K to 1, Gr. 6/7 to 8, Gr. 6 to 1, and Gr. 9 to 1) that correspond to this school's grade span. Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind 0/08 Page 5 of 8

Status and Improvement Report Year 006-07 Student Conduct Vital Signs Attendance and Absences Year 004-05 -06 006-07 Average Daily Attendance: % (higher is better) Standard Non-suspended: 77 Suspended: 0 Suspensions, Year 006- No students were suspended at this school. 10 90.8% 89.% 90.9% 95. Class A: 0 Average Daily Absences: in days (lower is better) 16.4 19. 16.4 9 Class B: 0 Class C: 0 Class D: 0 0. 0. 40. 60. 80. 100. Examples of class of suspension: Class A: Burglary, robbery, sale of dangerous drugs Class B: Disorderly conduct, trespassing Class C: Class cutting, insubordination, smoking Class D: Contraband (e.g. possession of tobacco) Completion Dropouts Graduates and Other Completers Year Number Percent 004-05 0 0. -06 1.% 006-07 1 16.7% The dropout figures are based on the cohort of first-time 9th graders who dropped out prior to graduating. Total number of Seniors Percent of Diploma graduates Percent of Certificate of Course Completion Percent of Individually Prescribed Program 004-05 -06 006-07 Percent of school completers Total number of Freshmen 1 1 1 Percent graduated on time 0..% 16.7% Freshmen who began high school in school year 00-04 and graduated in 006-07. Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind 0/08 Page 6 of 8

Status and Improvement Report Year 006-07 Vital Signs Hawaii Assessment HCPS Reading HCPS Mathematics 10 65% 10 9% 8 6 8 6% 7 6% 7 7% Grade 6 5 55% 6 Grade 6 5 6% 9% 4 4 54% 4 48% 6% 49% 4 6 8 10 Percent Proficient 4 6 8 10 Percent Proficient A bar may not be shown to maintain student confidentiality (see FERPA). Grade Meaning HCPS Writing Clarity Design Conventions Overall 4 1.0.6 1.0.5 1.0.4 1.0.5 1.0.5 6 1.1.8 1.0.6 1.0.5 1.0.7 1.0.7 9 1..6 1.0.4 1.0. 1.0.5 1.1.5 11.0.8 1.0.7 1.0.7 1.0.7 1..7 Writing is scored on 4 dimensions from a low of 1 to a high of 5. The figures show the average for each dimension for each grade level tested. The HCPS Writing assessment is given in grades 4, 6, 9, and 11. Grade TerraNova, nd Edition Percent Average and Above Reading National Norm is 77% Mathematics National Norm is 77% 74% 75% 4 77% 77% 5 78% 77% 6 78% 7% 7 71% 74% 8 79% 76% 10 78% 75% The TerraNova is a national norm-reference assessment with 9 stanine levels. Scores in stanines 1 to represent "Below Average," and scores in stanines 4 to 9 represent "Average and Above." Note. In 006-, the Hawaii Content and Performance Standards (HCPS) III and TerraNova assessments were used. " " means missing data. " " means data not reported to maintain student confidentiality (see FERPA). Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind 0/08 Page 7 of 8

Status and Improvement Report Other Information Year 006-07 Published on November 0,. Updated on March 6, 008. System Evaluation and Reporting Section, Systems Accountability Office, Office of the Superintendent, Honolulu, HI: Hawaii Department of Education. Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind 0/08 Page 8 of 8