Preventing post-operative recurrence

Similar documents
Positioning Biologics in Ulcerative Colitis

Crohn s Disease: A New Approach to an Old Problem

September 12, 2015 Millie D. Long MD, MPH, FACG

Trials in Prevention of Post Surgical Recurrence in Crohn s Disease

Azathioprine for Induction and Maintenance of Remission in Crohn s Disease

INFLIXIMAB FOR PREVENTION OF POST-OPERATIVE CROHN S DISEASE RECURRENCE: THE PREVENT TRIAL

Crohn s Disease: Should We Treat Based on Symptoms or Based on Objective Markers of Inflammation?

Treatment Goals. Current Therapeutic Pyramids Crohn s Disease Ulcerative Colitis 11/14/10

Prevention and Management of Postoperative Crohn s disease

Mucosal Healing in Crohn s Disease. Geert D Haens MD, PhD University Hospital Gasthuisberg University of Leuven Leuven, Belgium

How to Optimize Induction and Maintenance Responses: Definitions and Dosing Advances in Inflammatory Bowel Disease December 6, 2009

Position of Biologics in IBD Circa 2006: Top Down vs. Step Up Therapy

Mucosal healing: does it really matter?

Ali Keshavarzian MD Rush University Medical Center

5/2/2018 SHOULD DEEP REMISSION BE A TREATMENT GOAL? YES! Disclosures: R. Balfour Sartor, MD

Common Questions in Crohn s Disease Therapy. Case

Personalized Medicine in IBD

Approximately 80% of patients with Crohn s disease

Initiation of Maintenance Treatment in Moderate to Severe New Onset Crohn s Disease

Prevention of Postoperative Crohn s disease

Anne Griffiths MD, FRCPC. SickKids Hospital, University of Toronto. Buenos Aires, August 16, 2014

Anus,Rectum and Colon

Predicting the natural history of IBD. Séverine Vermeire, MD, PhD Department of Gastroenterology University Hospital Leuven Belgium

Personalized Medicine in IBD: Where Are We in 2013

Indications for use of Infliximab

Beyond Anti TNFs: positioning of other biologics for Crohn s disease. Christina Ha, MD Cedars Sinai Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center

The Best of IBD at UEGW (Crohn s)

Perianal and Fistulizing Crohn s Disease: Tough Management Decisions. Jean-Paul Achkar, M.D. Kenneth Rainin Chair for IBD Research Cleveland Clinic

Mono or Combination Therapy with. Individualized Approach

An Update on the Biologic Treatment for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. David A. Schwartz, MD

Azienda Ospedaliera S. Camillo Forlanini. Unità Operativa di Gastroenterologia. Moscow June Cosimo Prantera

CCFA. Crohns Disease vs UC: What is the best treatment for me? November

Op#mizing)Management)in)IBD:) Mucosal)Healing)

How to use infliximab?

Medical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Efficacy and Safety of Treatment for Pediatric IBD

Withdrawal of drug therapy in patients with quiescent Crohn s disease

Optimizing the effectiveness of anti-tnf therapy in paediatric IBD

Spectrum of Diverticular Disease. Outline

Predictors of recurrence of Crohn s disease after ileocolectomy: A review

Efficacy and Safety of Treatment for Pediatric IBD

Impact of endoscopic monitoring in postoperative Crohn s disease patients already receiving pharmacological prevention of recurrence

PD Dr. med. R. Wiest / Dr. med. P. Juillerat, MSc. Donnerstag 18 ten Oktober 2012 UPDATE PROKTOLOGIE: Konservative Behandlungsmöglichkeiten?

Endpoints for Stopping Treatment in UC

5-ASA Therapy, Steroids and Antibiotics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Percent Cumulative. Probability. Penetrating. Inflammatory. Stricturing. Months Patients at risk N =

Crohn's Disease. The What, When, and Why of Treatment

Mild-moderate Ulcerative Colitis Sequential & Combined treatments need to be tested. Philippe Marteau, Paris, France

Medical Management of Intestinal Strictures

The following slides are provided as presented by the author during the live educa7onal ac7vity and are intended for reference purposes only.

Fistulizing Crohn s Disease: The Aggressive Approach

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 3 October 2012

John F. Valentine, MD Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program University of Utah

Join the conversation at #GIFORUMCCFA

Epidemiology / Morbidity

Clinical guideline Published: 10 October 2012 nice.org.uk/guidance/cg152

IBD Case Studies. David Rowbotham. Clinical Director & Consultant Gastroenterologist Dept of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Auckland City Hospital

COPYRIGHT. Inflammatory Bowel Disease What Every Clinician Needs to Know. Adam S. Cheifetz, MD. Director, Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Selby Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008:14:

Choosing and Positioning Biologic Therapy for Crohn s Disease: (Still) Looking for the Crystal Ball

Crohn s disease is a chronic inflammatory condition without a

Latest Treatment Updates for Ulcerative Colitis: Evolving Treatment Goals

Effect of Adalimumab on an Enterocutaneous Fistula in Patients with Crohn s Disease: A Case Series

4/16/2018. Updates in Crohn s Disease. Disclosures. Learning Objectives. Crohn s Disease is Progressive and Destructive

NON INVASIVE MONITORING OF MUCOSAL HEALING IN IBD. THE ROLE OF BOWEL ULTRASOUND. Fabrizio Parente

Implementation of disease and safety predictors during disease management in UC

IBD Understanding Your Medications. Thomas V. Aguirre, MD Santa Barbara GI Consultants

Recent Advances in the Management of Refractory IBD

Pouchitis and Cuffitis A bloody mess. Sze-Lin Peng Colorectal Surgeon Counties Manukau District Health Board

Adalimumab versus infliximab in treating post-operative recurrence of Crohn s disease: a national cohort study

Crohn s Disease. Resident Lecture 1/17/19

Biologics in IBD. Brian P. Bosworth, MD, NYSGEF Associate Professor of Medicine Weill Cornell Medical College

New treatment options in UC. Rob Bryant IBD Consultant Royal Adelaide Hospital

Challenges in IBD: The Post-Op IBD Patient: Preventing Pouchitis & Recurrence

Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Dilatation of Strictures in Crohn s Disease

Agenda. Predictive markers in IBD. Management of ulcerative colitis. Management of Crohn s disease

Cancer Risk with IBD Therapies How to Discuss with your Patients?

Ulcerative Colitis: Refining our Management and Incorporating Newer Concepts

To help protect your privacy, PowerPoint prevented this external picture from being automatically downloaded. To download and display this picture,

Oxford Inflammatory Bowel Disease MasterClass. What is early IBD? Prof. Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet Head, IBD Unit Nancy University Hospital, France

Il ruolo degli anticorpi anti farmaco nella pratica clinica

Crohn's Disease. The What, When, and Why of Treatment

Nutrition as primary therapy in IBD. Dr Clare Donnellan Leeds General Infirmary

Treating to Achieve a Target and Disease Monitoring in 2015: State of the Art

Crohn disease (CD) is a chronic disease with clinical and

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Abstract. Introduction

The future of IBD therapeutic research

IBD Updates. Themes in IBD IBD management journey. New tools for therapeutic monitoring. First-line treatment in IBD

Dr David Epstein Vincent Pallotti Hospital and University of Cape Town

Dr. Elmer Schabel, MD. Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Bonn, Germany (No conflicts of interest)

Crohn's Disease. The What, When, and Why of Treatment

Until the late 1990s, treatment of Crohn s disease was primarily aimed at

Pregnancy in IBD CDDW 2014

IBD :- a new era of diagnostics and therapy Dr Martyn Dibb Consultant Luminal Gastroenterologist Royal Liverpool University Hospital

Meta-Analysis of the Placebo Rates of Clinical Relapse and Severe Endoscopic Recurrence in Postoperative Crohn s Disease

WHY HAVE WE NOT FINALLY FIGURED OUT COMBINATION THERAPY?

Activity and Endoscopic measures : Crohn s disease. Jean-Frederic COLOMBEL Justin Cote-Daigneault Icahn Medical School at Mount Sinai, New York

Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

11/13/11. Biologics for CD and CUC: The Impact on Surgical Outcomes. Principles of Successful Intestinal Surgery

Achieving Success in Ulcerative Colitis: the Role of Infliximab

Transcription:

Oxford Inflammatory Bowel Disease MasterClass Preventing post-operative recurrence Dr Oliver Brain Oxford

Disclosures Presented at IEE, Oxford 2013 AbbVie sponsored meeting

Talk Outline Risk factors for recurrence Diagnosis of recurrence (briefly) Evidence for recurrence prevention

Preventing post-op recurrence in CD An important question Goes to the heart of our understanding (or lack) of the biology of this disease Recurrence in the absence of macro or microscopic disease Why at the anastomosis? 1-3 1. Rutgeerts P et al Gut 1984;25:665-672. 2. Rutgeerts P et al Gastroenterology 1990;99:956-963. 3.Olaison G et al Gut 1992;33:331-335

Pre-OP Mucus DC T Cell Paneth Cell Macrophage Fibroblast

Post-OP Mucus DC DC Fibroblast Paneth Cell Macrophage T Cell

Cosnes J et al Inflamm Bowel Dis 2002;8(4):244 Crohn s phenotype over time

Factors that may affect recurrence Patient-related Smoking (at least doubles recurrence rate) 1,2 * Family history Genetics Disease-related Surgery-related Age of onset* Disease duration Disease location perianal disease 3 * Disease behaviour penetrating disease 4 * Granulomas Myenteric plexitis Prior resection 5 * Extensive SB resection 5,6 * Resection margins Anastomosis type Strictureplasty Laparoscopic vs open * Reliable predictors Mutable Potentially mutable Immutable 1. Reese GE et al Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23:1213-1221. 2. Ryan WR et al Am J Surg 2004;187:219-25 3. Hofer B et al Hepatogastoenterology 2001;48:152-5 4. Simillis et al Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:196-205 5. Bernell O et al Br J Surg 2000;87:1697. 6. Welsch T et al Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22:1043-9

Approach to Treatment Immediate Delayed No treatment Pros Disease behaviour modification Prevention of surgery / bowel length preservation Cons Ad hoc patient selection and?overtreatment Ltd data of disease modification Identifiable need Known outcomes in absence of treatment Limited data of disease modification No treatment risk Primum non nocere Disease will almost invariably reoccur Disease morbidity When should we stop treatment?

Defining Recurrence Clinical Faecal / serum markers Endoscopic Capsule endoscopy Radiological MR, CT, US, SBE Surgical

Defining Recurrence Clinical Symptoms, CDAI (or CRP) underestimate recurrence 1-3 Endoscopy remains the gold standard New lesions can be visualised within weeks to months Mismatch / lag between endoscopic recurrence and symptoms At 1 year 73% endoscopic vs 20% clinical 4 1. Viscido A et al Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999;31:274-279. 2. Regueiro et al Gastroenterology 2009;136:441-450e1. 3.Walters TD et al Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17:1547-1556. 4. Rutgeerts P et al Gut 1984;25:665-672

Crohn s disease recurrence - Endoscopic Rutgeerts score 1 : i0 i1 i2 i3 i4 No lesions 5 apthous lesions >5, skip lesions, anastomotic lesions Diffuse apthous ileitis Diffuse with larger ulcers +/- narrowing Score POR risk 0-1 <10% at 10 yr 2 40% risk at 5 yr 3-4 50-100% risk at 5 yr 1. Rutgeerts P et al Gut 1984;25:665-672

Crohn s disease recurrence - Surgical The problem: 80% patients with Crohn s disease require at least one resection 1 Surgery rates did not decline significantly in immunomodulator era 2 A small number of patients with CD develop short bowel syndrome 70% patients with CD require >1 resection over lifetime 3-5 15% surgical recurrence in 5 years 6 1. Caprili R et al Gut 2006;55(suppl 1):i36-58. 2. Cosnes J et al Gut 2005;54:237-241 3. Chardavoyne et ak Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:495-502. 4. Lock et al NEJM 1981;304:1586-1588. 5. Landsend E et al Sand J Gastroenterol 2006;41:1204-1208. Peyrin-Biroulet L et al Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:289-297

Medical therapies trialed Antibiotics 5 ASA compounds Steroids Enteral nutrition Probiotics Immunomodulators Anti-TNF agents Other biologics

Imidazole Antibiotics RCT metronidazole 20mg/kg/day vs placebo for 3 months 1 RCT ornidazole 1g/day vs placebo for 1 year 2 1 yr endoscopic recurrence RR 0.44 (95% CI 0.26-0.74) 3 1 yr clinical recurrence RR 0.23 (95% CI 0.09-0.57) 3 NNT 4 But: Effect sustained only to 1 year Higher rates adverse events RR 2.39 (95 CI 1.5-3.7) and withdrawal 1. D Haens GR et al Gastroenterology 2008;135:1123-1129. 2. Rutgeerts P et al Gastroenterology 2005;128:856-861. 3. Doherty GA et al Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;31:802-809

Budesonide Two placebo-controlled trials of 3mg and 6mg / day 1,2 At 1 year post-op no improvement in: Endoscopic recurrence Clinical recurrence In addition: ½ patients on steroids post-op develop dependence or resistance at 1 year 3 1.Ewe K et al Eur J Gast Hep 1999;11:277-282. Hellers G et al Gastroenterology 1999;116:294-300. 3. Irving PM et al Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;26:313-329

5-ASA compounds Mesalazine 3 x Meta-analyses: Reduced post-op recurrence by 13% 1 No more effective than placebo 2 Decreased clinical but not endoscopic recurrence, and inferior to Aza/ 6-MP 3 Cochrane review 4 NNT 12 to prevent clinical recurrence Sulfasalazine No benefit demonstrated 4 1.Camma et al Gastroenterology 1997;113:1465-1473.2. Ford AC et al Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:617-29 3. Doherty GA et al Gastroenterology 2009;136. 4. Doherty G et al Cochrane Data Sys Rev 2009:CD006873

Enteral Nutrition Evaluated in a single prospective non-randomised study 1 40 pts, post-op ileal / ileo-caecal CD 20 pts self-administered nocturnal NG enteral feed At 1 year: Control Enteral nutrition P value Clinical recurrence 35% 5% 0.048 Endoscopic recurrence 70% 30% 0.027 Unlikely to be widely applicable 1. Yamamoto T et al Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;25:67-72

Probiotics Insufficient evidence of efficacy Studies of: Lactobacillus johnsonii 1,2 Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG 3 Synbiotic 2000 4 VSL3 5 Metanalysis found probiotics ineffective to prevent endoscopic or clinical recurrence 6 1. Marteau P et al Gut 2006;55:842-847. 2.Van Gossum A et al Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007;13:135-142. 3. Prantera C et al Gut 2002;51:385-389 4. Chermesh I et al Dig Dis Sci 2007;52:385-389. 5. Madsen K et al Gastroenterology 2008;134. 6. Doherty GA et al Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;31:802-809

Recombinant IL-10 One placebo-controlled trial 1 Tenovil given in 2 different regimens 37 Tenovil and 21 placebo patients had colonoscopy At 12 weeks post-op no difference in: Endoscopic recurrence Clinical recurrence 1. Colombel JF et al Gut 2001;49:42-46

Thiopurines Inflammation Meta-analysis 1 (inc 4 RCTs) Thiopurines more effective than control (placebo, antibiotics, 5ASA) at: 2 years: mean difference 13% (95% CI 2-24%); NNT 8 (clinical) 1 year: Prevents recurrence Rutgeerts i2-i4, but not severe i3-i4 Thiopurines more effective than placebo at: 1 year: mean difference 23% (95% CI 9-37%); NNT 4 (endoscopic) 1. Peyrin-Biroulet L et al Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:2089-2096. 2. Ardizzone et al Gastroenterology 2004;127:730-740.

Thiopurines Further Surgery Retrospective review of 326 pts 1 46 pts required reoperation > 3 years thiopurine 27% reoperation rate < 3 months thiopurine 55% reoperation rate (p<0.004) Papay P et al Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:1158

Anti-TNFs and Post-Op CD Assumptions we might make: Early instigation of treatment is better 1-4 Anti-TNF can maintain remission 5 (in responders) Dual immunosuppression is better 6,7 We use anti-tnf in those with more severe disease 8 We can prevent further surgery Longer duration of treatment is better 1. Hanauer S et al Lancet 2002;359:1541-1549. 2. Hymas J et al Gastroenterology 2007;132:863-873. 3. Peyrin-Biroulet L et al Gastroenterology 2008;135:1420-1422. 4. Colombel J-F et al Gastroenterology 2007;132:52-65. 5. Behm BW et al Cochrane Rev 2008. 6. D Haens G et al Lancet 2008;371:660-7. Colombel et al

D Haens G et al Lancet 2008;371:660-7 Early dual immunosuppression

Infliximab Preventative Strategy One published RCT 1 24 pts to IFX or placebo immediately post-op IFX group: *more smokers 46% vs 8% *fewer immunomodulators 36% vs 54% At 1 year endo recurrence (i2-i4): Placebo Infliximab 11/13 (85%) 1/11 (9%) Other prospective open label trials 2-4 are small (total 33 IFX treated patients), but are largely reflective of this response 1. Regueiro et al Gastroenterology 2009;136:441-550. 2. Sorrentino et al 2007 Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1804. 3. Sakuraba et al Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;27:947. 4. Yoshida et al Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;18:1617

Adalimumab Preventative Strategy Small prospective studies Study Control Patients Follow-up Outcome Response Rates 1 NA 8 2 yr Endoscopic remission 2 NA 29 (high risk) 1 yr Endoscopic remission 75% 79% High risk = 2 or more of: smokers, penetrating disease, extensive resection, 2 resections Overall similar response rates to Infliximab 1. Papamichael et al J Crohn s Colitis 2012;6:924-931. 2. Aguas et al World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:4391-4398. 3.

Anti-TNF agents Reactive strategy St u d y Drug Control Patie nts 1 Ifx 5ASA or Aza Time since surgery Follow-up Outcome Response rates 8 6 months 6 months Mucosal healing 38% 2 Ifx NA 6 1 year 1 year Endoscopic remission 50% 3 Ifx 5ASA 13 6 months 1 year Endoscopic remission 54% 4 Ifx or Ada NA 28 6 12 months NA Mucosal healing 50% 5 Ada NA 15 6 months 2 years Endoscopic remission 60% 1. Yamamoto et al 2009. 2 Regueiro et al 2010. 3 Sorrentino et al 2012. 4 Boueyre et al 2012. 5 Papamichal et al 2012.

Anti-TNF agents Reactive strategy St u d y Drug Control Patie nts 1 Ifx 5ASA or Aza Time since surgery Follow-up Outcome Response rates 8 6 months 6 months Mucosal healing 38% 2 Ifx NA 6 1 year 1 year Endoscopic remission 50% 3 Ifx 5ASA 13 6 months 1 year Endoscopic remission 54% 4 Ifx or Ada NA 28 6 12 months NA Mucosal healing 50% 5 Ada NA 15 6 months 2 years Endoscopic remission 60% 1. Yamamoto et al 2009. 2 Regueiro et al 2010. 3 Sorrentino et al 2012. 4 Boueyre et al 2012. 5 Papamichal et al 2012.

Anti-TNF High risk phenotype 11 patients with multiple operations ( 2). Median 4. 3 smokers, 9 perianal disease, 9 previous 6-MP IFX 5mg/kg started 2-4 weeks post-op, not randomised Clinical remission at 2 years: 60% Endoscopic remission at 2 years: 40% Sakuraba et al Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;27:947.

Anti-TNF or Thiopurine? -High risk pts Open-label pilot. Prospective, randomised 1. 22 patients high risk, post-ileocaecal resection After 1 year: Endoscopic recurrence Histological recurrence (severe) Infliximab Azathioprine P value 9% 40% 0.14 18% 80% 0.008 High risk = 2 or more of: age < 30 at diagnosis; penetrating disease; previous surgery. 1. Armuzzi et al JCC 2013 (Epub)

Anti-TNF Preventing further surgery? Pair-matched study 100 post-op patients who received IFX Matched by gender, Vienna classification, age at operation Median follow-up: IFX Control 36 months 51 months Surgical recurrence: IFX Control 3/100 34/100 HR 0.22 (95% CI 0.11-0.44) Araki T et al Surg Today 2013 Mar 6 (Epub)

How long should we treat? Small study, not controlled 1 12 patients in endoscopic and clinical remission after 3 years IFX therapy (post-op) Re-scoped 4 months later 10/12 (83%) developed endoscopic recurrence Re-introduction IFX at 3mg/kg restored response 1. Sorentino et al Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:591-599

Summary 1 Effective Therapies 5 ASA minimal efficacy Imidazole antibiotics Enteral nutrition } Tolerance problems / not widely applicable Thiopurines Most effective of non-biologic therapies Anti-TNF most effective, and?better if used early No data on dual immunosuppression in this setting

Summary 2 General Approach Start with a good surgeon Individualised approach Consider risk factors for severe disease Bowel length preservation Stop smoking Endoscopic follow-up 6-12 months No medication for low risk disease, colonoscopy 6-12 months Thiopurines for moderate risk disease / i2-?i3 disease Anti-TNF +/- thiopurines high risk disease / i3-4 disease

Examples of my approach Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 26 yr old man 1 st presentation. Smoker Stenosing isolated TI disease. Ileo-caecal resection Stops smoking post-op 28 yr old woman CD diagnosed age 19 Non-smoker Age 21 Rt hemicolectomy for ileocaecal disease (stenosis) 5ASA 1 year post-op Ileal resection (stenosis) 34 yr old man CD diagnosed 29 Non-smoker Appendectomy age 27 Azathioprine for 4 years 30cm TI resection plus 6 SB strictureplasties At resection has enteroenteric fistula No treatment Colonoscopy 6 months Thiopurine Colonoscope 6-12 months Anti-TNF +/- thiopurine Colonoscope and MRI SB at 6-12 months year